The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself...

27
The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance to the commands of the civil magistrate; we are all qualified, entitled, and morally obliged to evaluate the conduct of our rulers. - John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, 1689

Transcript of The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself...

Page 1: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

The Liberal State

English Politics and the Right to Revolution

Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance to the commands of the civil magistrate; we are all qualified, entitled, and morally obliged to evaluate the conduct of our rulers.

- John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, 1689

Page 2: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

Paradox…

Absolute rulers and rationalism helped early modern societies to negotiate fundamental social and economic change…

…but that same rationalism would be the source of Absolutism’s strongest critics.

Page 3: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

I. Enlightened Despots

A well conducted government must have an underlying concept so well integrated that it could be likened to a system of philosophy…All financial, political and military matters must flow towards one goal…the strengthening of the state and the furthering of its power.

- Frederick II “The Great” d. 1786

Page 4: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

A. Science and the state

1. R & D - Académie des Sciences 1666 - Royal Academy 1660

Christopher Wren. d. 1723

Page 5: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

B. The Sun King Louis XIV

1. “I am the state”dismissed assembliesdirect rule / appointmentsprofessional armyGallicanism

Edict of Fontainebleau 1685Jansenism

Page 6: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

2. “I have loved war too much”

Natural borders

AlliancesHabsburgsWar of the League of AugsburgWar of Spanish Succession

Page 7: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

C. Czar of all the Russias

1. Peter I “The Great” 1689-1725- Westernization- Eastern expansion- state service- serfdom

Romanovs

Page 8: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

2. Catherine “the Great” r. 1762-1796- un-Enlightenment 1773- Wild, wild East

Page 9: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

D. Germany stirs

1. HRE?Westphalia 1648

Siege of Vienna 1683

Leopold I r. 1657-1705

Page 10: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

2. Austrian Habsburg Dynasty

Maria TeresaJoseph II 1780-1790

Page 11: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

3. Hohenzollerns(Prussia)

- militarism / state service- Frederick the Great

1712-1786

Page 12: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

II. The Rights (and Wrongs) of Englishmen

For the king, turning to the gentleman that touched the axe said "Hurt not the axe that may hurt me.“

- Bulstrode Whitelock

Page 13: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

A. Constitutionalism (sort of)

1. Norman Conquest 1066

2. Magna Carta 1215

Page 14: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

B. Tudor Family Values

1. There’s something about Mary

Henry VIII “Bloody Mary” Elizabeth I r. 1553-58 r. 1558-1603

Page 15: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

C. The Ghost of John Calvin

1. Roundheads- anti-hierarchical

- “middle” class

Page 16: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

D. Stuart Kings

1. James I 1603-1625

“Divine Right” / Absolutism

King James Bible (1611)

Page 17: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

III. English Revolutions, 1640 - 1689

Page 18: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

A. Royal Authoritarian

1. Charles I 1625-49

2. Short Parliament 1640

Page 19: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

B. English Civil War 1642-1651

1. Culture Wars King v. Parliament Anglican (Catholic) v. Puritan Old v. New “Money”

Oliver Cromwell

Page 20: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

2. Execution of Charles I 1649

Liberty at risk

Page 21: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

D. Commonwealth (1649-60)

& Restoration (1660-89)

1. Theocracy

2. Charles II

Page 22: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

IV. Modern Liberalism

Limited Government

Natural Law

Personal Liberty

Positive Humanism

Page 23: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

A. The Glorious Revolution

1. James II 1685

Page 24: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

2. Dual Monarchy 1688

- William & Mary

Page 25: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

3. Checks & Balances

Rise of Parliament

Toleration Act 1688

Declaration of Rights 1689

Page 26: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

B. Justification

1. Remembering Hobbes

John Locke

Page 27: The Liberal State English Politics and the Right to Revolution Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance.

Two Treatises of Government 1689

- natural rights

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 1690

- tabula rasa