The LargeHadronCollider- adream thathas become...
Transcript of The LargeHadronCollider- adream thathas become...
The Large HadronCollider - adream thathas becomerealityLuisa CifarelliDipartimento di Fisica, Universitadi Bologna, Italy
TuesdaY,3 May - 11:15 a.m,
The origin oftheLarge Hadron Coll ider(LHC) at CERNnearGeneva hasfar-reachingroots.The LHCproject, designandconstructionoverseveral decades isanexemp lary achievement in fundamentalphysicsresea rch.Iwill explainthemodeof operationof theLHC, pointing out theadvantages of beambeam colliders over accelerators with fixed targets andalso addressingthecharacteristicsof hadroncolliders vs. electron-positron colliders.
The world epochal records oftheLHC in tenns ofenergy andluminosity- togetherwith itsmarvellousdetectors conceived withtop-technology components- areenabling beautiful experiments. Iwillpresent a paradeofsuch detectors andofsomeof the impressive measurements andresultssofarobtained. Iwill finally sketch a few ofthepossible surprises thattheLHC mighthave instore.This talkwillprovideunderstanding ofthefantastic role forthe LHC at thedawn ofa new era forscience andknowledge.
Happy 25th anniversary EPL !!!
1986 1997
2007
2011
First proposal for a European Letters Journal formulated in 1980 under the EPS Presidency of A. Zichichi (1978-1980)
Initiative of a collective European effort to harmonize physics publications in Europe to create a high-quality letters journal that would publish the best communications on new physics wherever it was done, be it Europe or worldwide
Final partnership agreement signed in March 1985 under the EPS Presidency of J. H. Stafford (1984-1986)
Angela Oleandri(SIF Editorial Director and Memberof the EPLA Board of Directors)
Happy 25th anniversary EPL !!!
Presidents:SIF – R.A. RicciSFP – M. Jacob
IOP – A. Merrison
<< After years of the most thorough discussions on the needs, the means, the structure, the people … during which the physics community of Europe through the EPS Divisions and the national societies has been fully consulted, EPS is able to formally announce the publication from 1 January 1986 of a new fortnightly journal:
EUROPHYSICS LETTERS (EPL)
incorporating Journal de Physique Lettresand Il Nuovo Cimento Lettere
With these words – published on the front page of the June 1985 issue of Europhysics News – the journal venture officially started >>
Happy 25th anniversary EPL !!!
1986Partners for initial investment: SFP – SIF – IOP – EPS
supported by other national societiesPublishers: Les Editions de Physique (EDP) – SIFMerger of 2 letters journals: Journal de Physique Lettres –
Lettere al Nuovo CimentoEditorial Office @ EPS Headquarters (Geneva) with scientific
background and control by EPSProduction @ SIF (Bologna)Printing and distribution @ EDP (Paris)1st Editor-in-Chief: N. Kurti1st Chairman of Management Board: W. Buckel (EPS)
Initial unexpected success !!!Among authors of the first issues in 1986-1988:C. Jarlskog, E. Fiorini, R.L. Mössbauer, O. Poulsen, C. Cohen-Tannoudji,
J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, P.G. De Gennes, G. Parisi, M. Virasoro, A. Coniglio, H. Whal, S. Gozzini, F. Bassani, V. Degiorgio, A. Paoletti,
J.C. Sens, A. L’Huillier, M. Leduc, J.M. Gaillard, F. Iachello, L. Pietronero, V. Dose, UA1 …
Happy 25th anniversary EPL !!!
Happy 25th anniversary EPL !!!In EUROPHYSICS LETTERS Volume 1, Number 7, April 1st 1986, p. 327-345 UA1 Collaboration – Intermediate-vector-boson properties at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron ColliderAbstract. – The properties of a sample of 172 charged intermediate vector bosons decaying in the (eνe
) channel and 16 neutral intermediate vector bosons decaying
in the (e+e–) channel are described. …Note from the Editor-in-Chief
Our readers may have noticed with surprise that the length of the preceding paper is more than twice the agreed maximum. The paper was judged by three referees to be of the right character and quality for it to be published in Europhys. Lett. After discussion with two Co-editors and the referees it was agreed to accept the paper as an exceptional measure without cuts.
It was thought that shortening the paper by removing some of the information it contained would have greatly impaired its usefulness. ... We had to admit that here was a case where the results of the sustained collaborative effort of a large number of scientists and engineers could not be compressed into the space normally allocated to a paper. This decision was approved, although not unanimously, by the Editorial Board in retrospect.
However, we want to emphasize that this departure from the norm should not be regarded as a precedent, but rather as a very rare exception.
N. KURTI
Through the 1990s and at the turn of the century/millenium17 societies participating in the journal1996: online version of EPL hosted by EDP Sciences1997: creation of EPLA (Geneva) since EPS Headquaters
moved from Geneva to Mulhouse in 1996 under H. SchopperEPS Presidency1997: change of publication frequency and of cover of the
journal
2004: EPL Editorial Office moved from Geneva to Mulhouse under M. Ducloy EPS Presidency
… however some slowdownwith respect to initial success
2007: relaunch with new format and new cover
Happy 25th anniversary EPL !!!
High Energy (HE) Particle Physics – also called Subnuclear Physics – addresses the question of understanding the structure of matter at the most fundamental level, at the smallest scale of size
Thanks to large accelerators and colliders, particles can be produced and the interactions among their elementary constituents studied in the laboratory
Thanks to large and highly performing detectors, measurements can be performed with extreme precision
Subnuclear/HE Particle Physics
The LHC (Large Hadron Collider)presently working at CERN in Geneva
will allow the study of matter constituents and their interactions at unprecedented levels of
energies ever reached so far
LHC
Subnuclear/HE Particle Physics
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has been designed to accelerate beams of protons that can collide at energies up to √s = 14 TeV (7 TeV/beam)
It also allows to accelerate and make collide beams of ions (nuclei), in particular Pb nuclei (Pb82+ ions) at energies up to √sNN
= 5.5 TeVhigh temperature & energy density
QGP/QGCW
At present LHC is working as:p-p collider at √s = 7 TeV (3.5 TeV/beam)Pb-Pb collider at √sNN = 2.76 TeV
Particle accelerators & colliders
Particle accelerator: facility that allows to produce beams of particles with high kinetic energy
Charged particles (electrons, protons, ions/nuclei) are accelerated, guided and confined along well defined trajectories by means of electromagnetic fields
First accelerators were electrostatic (Cockcroft-Walton, Van de Graaff)single acceleration step ΔVmax~10-20 MVcontinuous beam of particles
High energy accelerators use instead alternate electric fields with:a series of sequential acceleration stepspulsed beam of bunches of particleslinear / circular Cockcroft-Walton
at Fermilab
Linear acceleratorSeries of cylindrical electrodes connected to an AC voltage generator (Wideröe)E = 0 inside each electrode constant velocityE = Vd between 2 contiguous electrodes acceleration
T/2
T
0
Acceleration if the traversal time through the electrodes with reversed polarity is T/2
electrodes with growing length Ln = vnT / 2
beam
AC generator
electrodes
source
(RF source)
Linear acceleratorSoon electrode length prohibitive …
increase νRF but growth of e.m. radiationinclude electrodes in a series of contiguous (in phase) “cavities”unique RF cavity system to obtain a progressive wave guide(acceleration with vphase
≈ vparticle )
Example of rectangularwave guide
Electric field
Particles are trapped in the RF voltage where they oscillate back and forth in time/energy (RF cavity = resonator tuned to a selected frequency)
bunch structure of beams
Magnetic field
Circular accelerator: synchrotronBeam maintained on an orbit of constant radius R
acceleration at each turn (orbit)by means of magnets positioned along the circumference
magnetic field increasing with energy to keep particles on orbit
qvB = m v2
R
B = mvqR
Lorentz force
magnets
accelerating RF cavity
Storage ring and colliderSpecial type of synchrotron: with injected beams accelerated and maintained on orbit at the desired energy
Two beams circulating in opposite directions colliding in different intersection points where the experimental setups (detecors) are positioned
After each interaction the beams remain in orbit for further collisions
acceleratingRF cavities
magnets
intersection points(detectors)
Cycle of a collider
injection
acceleration
stable beams & collisions
Ecm2 = �P fascio� Ptarghetta�2
= �E fascio�mc2�2− p2c2
= 2 m2 c4�2 mc2 E fascio
�2mc2 E fascio
Fixed target(proton beam on proton target)
Ecm= �2mc2 E fascio
Ecm2 = �P fascio1� P fascio2�
2
= 2 m2 c4�2 E fascio2 �2p2 c2
= 4 E fascio2
Collider(two colliding proton beams)
Ecm= 2 E fascio
Advantage of a collider
fascio = beamtarghetta = target
Energy and luminosity
The luminosity is determined by the collider parameters
N n. of particles/bunchn n. of bunches in orbitf collision frequencyσx σy
beam dimensions
L = N 2nf4πσ xσ y
FHigh luminosity is essential to study rare phenomena
(F = suppression factor (0.8-0.95) depending on beam crossing angle & divergence)
LHC parameters
LHC – yet another collider?The LHC surpasses existing accelerators/colliders in 2 aspects :
The energy of the beam of 7 TeV that is achieved within the size constraints of the existing 26.7 km LEP tunnel.
LHC dipole field 8.3 T
HERA/Tevatron ~ 4 T
The luminosity of the collider that will reach unprecedented values for a hadron machine:
LHC pp ~ 1034 cm-2
s-1
Tevatron pp 3x1032 cm-2
s-1
SppbarS pp 6x1030 cm-2
s-1
The combination of very high field magnets and very high beam intensities required to reach the luminosity targets makes operation of the LHC a great challenge !
A factor 2 in field
A factor 4 in size
A factor 30in luminosity
J. Wenninger, LNF Spring School, May 2010
LHC accelerator system
Proton source
Electric discharge in plasma chamber ionization of hydrogen
Ion extraction 90 keV
LINACLinear accelerator
for protons from source up to 50 MeV
PSB, PS and SPS
PSB Proton Synchrotron Booster 50 MeV 1.4 GeVPS Proton Synchrotron 1.4 GeV 26 GeVSPS Super Proton Synchrotron 26 GeV 450 GeV
After a first LINAC acceleration protons are further accelerated by a cascade of synchrotrons each increasing the energy by about one order of magnitude so as to reach the desired beam injection energy of LHC (450 GeV)
LHC tunnel & magnetsInstalled in the LEP tunnelSubdivided in 8 sectors4 interaction points~ 1200 dipole magnets, ~ 400 quadrupole magnets: superconducting, frozen at 1.9 K (superfluid liquid He)2 vacuum pipes with beams circulating in opposite directions inside the same magnet (two-in-one design)
Dipole length ~ 15 mI = 11800 A @ 8.3 T
Rüdiger Schmidt
Beam tube
Superconducting coil
Non-magnetic collars
Ferromagnetic iron
Steel cylinder for Helium
Insulation vacuum
Supports
Vacuum tank
Weight (magnet + cryostat) ~ 30 tonslength ~ 15 m J. Wenninger, LNF Spring School, May 2010
LHC RF systemThe LHC RF system operates at 400 MHz.
It is composed of 16 superconducting cavities, 8 per beam.
Peak accelerating voltage of 16 MV/beam.
For LEP at 104 GeV : 3600 MV/beam !
Synchrotron radiation loss
LHC @ 3.5 TeV 0.42 keV/turn
LHC @ 7 TeV 6.7 keV /turn
LEP @ 104 GeV ~3 GeV /turn
The nominal LHC beam radiates a sufficient amount of visible photons
to be actually observable !(total power ~ 0.2 W/m)
J. Wenninger, LNF Spring School, May 2010
LHC contains 9300 magnets(dipoles, quadrupoles, sextupoles, octupoles,
decapoles)1232 of them are superconducting dipoles(14.3 m, 8.3 T, 35 t) kept at the temperature of 1.9 K = -271.3 °C
less than the temperature of cosmic space (2.7 K) !!!
All superconducting dipoles are kept in a bath of superfluid liquid He @ 1.9 K, atmospheric pressure
LHC ha 36800 t of mass to keep cold !!!
Some numbers …
LHC vacuum is 10-13 atm10 times lower than on the Moon !!!
(in a volume of 6500 m3 ≈ like a cathedral)
At LHC the acceleration from 450 GeV to 7 TeVlasts ~ 20 minutes with an average energy gain of ~ 0.5 MeV/turn
Pb nuclei (Pb82+ ions) are produced and acceleratedat LHC at 5.5 TeV/nucleon pair
centre of mass energy of 1150 TeV
1 TeV ≈ the kinetic energy of a mosquito in flight !!! What is extraordinary at LHC is the fact that this energy is
concentrated in a space about 10-12 times < than a mosquito !!!
Some numbers …
Some numbers …
View of the LHC tunnel
Recollecti ons about
LHC
Recollections about LHC
ECFA LEP “White Book” 1979
In the ECFA LEP “White Book” 1979
LEP (1989-2000)e+e- 100–209 GeV
D = 5 m LHC (2009- ...)pp 14 TeV & PbPb 5.5 TeV/NN pair
LHC History1982 : First studies for the LHC project
1983 : Z0/W discovered at SPS proton antiproton collider (SppbarS)
1989 : Start of LEP operation (Z/W boson-factory)
1994 : Approval of the LHC by the CERN Council
1996 : Final decision to start the LHC construction
2000 : Last year of LEP operation above 100 GeV
2002 : LEP equipment removed
2003 : Start of LHC installation
2005 : Start of LHC hardware commissioning
2008 : Start of (short) beam commissioning
Powering incident on 19th Sept.
2009 : Repair, re-commissioning and beam commissioning
2010 : Start of a 2 year run at 3.5 TeV/beam
J. Wenninger, LNF Spring School, May 2010
LHC and Subnuclear/HE Particle Physics COORD
INATIO
N in EU
: CERN Council and ECFA
(European Com
mittee for Future A
ccelerators)
http://council.web.cern.ch/council/en/E
uropeanStrategy/ESParticlePhysics.htm
l
Geneva, 22 April 2011 – PRESS RELEASE Around midnight this night CERN’s Large Hadron Collider set a new world record for beam intensity at a hadron collider when it collided beams with a luminosity of 4.67 x 1032 cm-2s-1. This exceeds the previous world record of 4.024 x 1032 cm-2s-1, which was set by the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory’s Tevatron collider in 2010, and marks an important milestone in LHC commissioning.
Enter a New Era in Fundamental ScienceEnter a New Era in Fundamental ScienceStart‐up of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), one of the largest and truly global scientific projects ever, is the
most exciting turning point in particle physics.
Start‐up of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), one of the largest and truly global scientific projects ever, is the
most exciting turning point in particle physics.
Exploration of a new energy frontier Proton-proton collisions at ECM
up to 14 TeVExploration of a new energy frontier
Proton-proton collisions at ECM up to 14 TeV
LHC ring:27 km circumference
TOTEM LHCfMOEDAL
CMS
ALICE
LHCb
ATLASR. HeuerErice School 2010
LHC – Science and Planning
Main physics goals
Test the untested (scalar) sector of the Standard Model: spontaneous breaking of the EW symmetry and generation of the particle massesSearch for new physics at the TeV scaleIdentify (some of) the particle(s) that make up the
majority of the Universe (SuperSymmetry ?)Explore the QCD phase diagram with nucleus-nucleus
collisionsTest precision physics of B (especially strange
beautiful mesons)… Discover the UNEXPECTED
Short and long range planning for LHCPhysics run started 30 March 2010 @ 3.5+3.5 TeVPhysics run in 2010-2012 @ 3.5+3.5 TeV
(decide about slightly higher energy later on)Shutdown 2013 to prepare LHC towards 7+7 TeV
(Cu stabilizer consolidation, He-release valves, . . .)Physics run in 2014-2015 @ 7+7 TeV and up to 2020
@ design luminosity 1034 cm–2s–1 [Lint 300 fb–1]Around 2017 start major improvements of LHC
luminosity and detectors performanceHigh Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) @ ~5 x 1034 cm–2s–1
from 2020 up to 2030 [Lint = 3000 fb–1 in 10 years]
LHC – Science and Planning
[n. of collisions per unit of cross section: 1 μb=10–30 cm2 – 1 pb=10–36 cm2 – 1 fb=10–39 cm2]
2011 pp √s=7 TeV
2010 pp √s=7 TeV
2010 PbPb √sNN
=2.76 TeV
LHC integrated luminosity
[n. of collisions per unit of cross section:1 μb=10–30 cm2
– 1 pb=10–36 cm2 – 1 fb=10–39 cm2 ]
ATLAS (IP-1) A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS
ATLAS
C. Issever, Open LHCC Session, 23 March 2011J. Zhang, XIX International Conference on DIS and Related Subjects, 4 April 2011L. Vacavant, SLHC-PP Meeting, 8 March 2011
The largest detector ever builtGeneral purpose detector to allow the study of a large variety of high energy phenomena, with a large potential for new physics discoveriesHermetic detector with cylindrical geometry (barrel+endcaps) consisting of a complex system of subdetectors to identify electrons, muons, hadrons, jets, etc. and measure their momentum and energy
Length: 46 mHight: 25 mWidth: 25 mWeight: 7000 t
Results based on electrons, muons, jets, b-tagging, Etmiss:
Standard Model(soft QCD, prompt photons, B, W / Z, jets, top, …)
Higgs searchSUSY and other exotics searches
(leptoquarks, 4th generation quarks, extra gaugebosons, compositeness ...)
Eiffel towerweight: 7500 t
Di-muon invariant mass spectrum
Di-electron invariant mass spectrum
International Linear Collider (ILC)Site: to be determined in the next phase of the project Community: nearly 300 laboratories and universities around the world: more than 700 people are working on the accelerator design, and another 900 people on detector development. Energy: up to 500 GeV with an option to upgrade to 1 TeVAcceleration Technology: 16,000 superconducting accelerating cavities made of pure niobium Length: approximately 31 km
A TESLA nine-cell 1.3GHz superconducting niobium cavity
ILC RoadmapSteps to a Project – Technical (2-3 years)
– R&D for Risk Reduction and Technology Improvement– Systems Tests– Engineering Design + Industrialization
Project Implementation– Government Agreements for International Partnership– Siting and site-dependent design– Governance
Time to Construct– 5-6 years construction + 2 years commissioning
Project Proposal / Decision keyed to LHC results
ILC could be doing physics by early to mid- 2020s
Electron-positron collider consisting of two linear accelerators that face each other.
A study for a future electron-positron collider aiming at a center-of-mass energy range of 0.5 to 5 TeV, optimised for a nominal center-of-mass energy of 3 TeV
Compact Linear Collider (CLIC)
CLIC multi-lateral collaboration40 Institutes from 21 countries
2011-2016 – Project Preparation phaseGoal: preparation of a (staged) Project Implementation Plan (PIP) at reviewed energy and luminosity (taking into account results of CDR and based on Physics requests as soon as available…)
After 2016 – Project Implementation phaseGoal: Lay the grounds for full approval and preparation of the technical documentation needed for moving into (staged) construction following Physics requests (which should be known by the time….)
At EPS Conference:kick-off meeting to update the European Strategy for Particle Physics (2006)
Finalized by September 2012
Highest-mass dijet event recorded in 2010
Run 167607 Event 9435121Dijet Minv
=4 TeV ET
miss=31GeV
Soft QCD: pp inelastic cross sectionMeasurement of pp inelastic cross section for ξ > MX
2/s > 5 x 10–6
σinel = 60.3 ± 0.05(stat) ± 0.5(syst) ± 2.1(lumi) mb
Extrapolation to full ξ rangeConsistency with theoretical predictions
Top cross section and mass
Lepton+jets and dileptondecay channels
Excellent agreement with Standard Model predictions
σtt-bar = 180 ± 9(stat) ± 15(syst) ± 6(lumi) pb
Search for SM Higgs boson production(Brout-Englert-Higgs-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble boson)
Search for Standard Model Higgs
H0 γγ
mH = 110–140 GeV
H0 ZZ 4l, llνν, llqqmH
= 200–600 GeVH0 WW(*) lνlν, lνqq
mH = 120–200 GeV (*)
mH = 200–600 GeV
Excluded from direct searches: LEP mH
<114.4 GeVTevatron 158 < mH
< 173 GeV
Excluded if 4th sequential high mass fermion generation:Tevatron 131 < m < 204
Exclusion limit for 200 GeV < mH
< 600 GeV:
Fit parameter μ = σ/σSM(i.e. μ = 1 SM prediction)
95% CL upper limit means:σSignal
< μ x σSM x BR(H0 WW)
H0 WW lνqq
Search for Higgs boson H0 WW lνqq
Most sensitive channel at presentfor 120 GeV < mH
< 200 GeVBest exclusion limit at 95% CL:cross section < 1.2 x σSMat mH
=160 GeV
Search for Higgs boson H0 WW* lνlνExciting 2011 ahead of ATLAS with 3 fb–1
Exclusion (95% CL) 120 GeV < mH
< 500 GeVEvidence (3σ)
130 GeV < mH < 450 GeV
Discovery (5σ)150 GeV < mH
< 175 GeV
H0 WW* lνlν
… catching up with the Tevatron soon
Events with 0 leptons+Etmiss+jets
Interpretaton in phenomenological simplified MSSM
If m=m(squark)=m(gluino), exclude m < 870 GeVExclude m(gluino) < 500 GeV
Search for SUSY
Events with 1 lepton+Etmiss+jets
Interpretaton in mSUGRA
Reach well beyond LEP and Tevatron
Most stringent limits to date
(sfermion )
(gau
gino
)
CMS (IP-5) Compact Muon Solenoid
CMS
G. Dissertori, Open LHCC Session, 23 March 2011L. Benhabib – F. Pandolfi – F. Ma – W. Quayle – M. Chiorboli, Moriond QCD, 20-27 March 2011C. Veelken, Moriond EWK, 14 March 2011M. Stoye, SLHC-PP Open Event, 8 March 2011
Compact detector built arounda huge superconducting solenoidal magnet (B = 4 T)Like ATLAS, CMS is a general purpose detector that will allowto study a large variety of expected and unexpected phenomenaIt consists of a tracking system, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimetersand muon detectors
Length: 21 mHeight: 15 mWidth: 15 mWeight: 12500 t
Results based on electrons, muons, jets, b-tagging, Etmiss:
Standard Model(jets at high / low pT
, heavy quarks, W/Z, …)Higgs searchSUSY and other exotics searches
(leptoquarks, 4th generation quarks, extra gauge bosons, compositeness ...)
Heavy ions (PbPb)
Rediscovery of Standard Model
Di-muon invariant mass spectrum
Jet cross section – Benchmark test of pQCD
Di-jet cross sectionData / theory compatible with inclusive jet measurement
Inclusive jet cross sectionGood agreement with prediction over > 10 orders of magnitude
Summary of various inclusive top pair production cross section measurements in 7 TeV pp collisions
In 2010: ~ 1000 tops in CMS+ATLAS
Top cross section and mass
Z0 τ+τ production
Z τ+τ production analyzed in 4 channels: μ+τhad, e+τhad, e+μ, μ+μ
σ x BR(Z/γ* τ+τ–) = 1.00 ± 0.05(stat) ± 0.08(sys) ± 0.04(lumi) nb
Measured Z τ+τ cross section in good agreement with measured Z l+l– (l = e/μ) cross section and with theory predictions (NNLO)
Search for MSSM Higgs boson(s)
Stringent limits on MSSM Higgs well beyond Tevatron reach(consistent with analogous ATLAS results)
(φ: pseudoscalar+scalar Higgs of ~ same mass)
H ττ, ντ
Search for SM Higgs boson H0 WW* lνlν
Excluded 144 < mH < 207 GeV/c2
(consistent with analogous ATLAS result)
95% CL mean expected and observed upper limits on the cross section σH
x BR(H WW* 2l2ν) for masses in the range120-600 GeV/c2
Results obtained using a Bayesian approach Expected cross sections for SM and for SM with a 4th fermion family (SM4)
Search for SUSYEvents with 0 leptons + Et
miss + jets Interpretaton in cMSSM
Events with 1 lepton + Etmiss + jets
Interpretaton in cMSSM
Extended previously explored range of model parameters(in agreement with ATLAS)
Road-map for discoveries set up
Z0 μ+μ– in PbPb at √sNN = 2.76 TeV
Z0 e+e– in PbPb at √sNN = 2.76 TeV
Z boson production in PbPb collisions
Z l+l– signal is essentially unaffected by the strongly interacting medium produced in PbPb collisionsZ production is a reference for processes modified by the medium such as quarkonia production, etc.Precise measurement of Z production in heavy ion collisions can help to constrain nuclear PDFs
LHCb (IP-8)LHC-beauty
LHCb
F. Teubert, LHCC Meeting, 23 March 2011A. Golutvin, CERN RRB, April 2011
Experiment focused on the study of quark-b (beauty) physics and on the study of rare decays and phenomena of hadrons containing quark-b
LHCb is an experiment made of a single arm spectrometer positioned in the forward region with respect to the interaction region
LHCb is using LHC as an “intensity frontier” machine rather than an “energy frontier” machineto explore quark flavour physics
Due to LHCb acceptance, trigger and detector resolution, the experiment is already competitive with Tevatron (in future with e+e- B factories)
Length: 26 mHeight: 16 mWidth: 16 mWeight: 10000 t
Results on:- Production studies (σb
, W / Z …)- Bs
mixing phase- Bs,d μμ- Bd K*μμ- Measurement of the angle γ of the
Unitarity Triangle (reconstruction of hadronic B decays)
- CP violation studies in charm sector
LHCb physics programmeThe main LHCb physics goal is to find evidence for new physics through the indirect effect that new degrees of freedom may have on B (beautiful b-mesons) and D (charmed c-mesons) decaysThis search is complementary to direct searches and provides information on masses, couplings, spins and CP phases
Search for super rare Bs,d μμ
Bs,d μμ can access new physics through new virtual particles entering in the loop, in particular the decay is sensitive to new MSSM scalar and/or pseudoscalar interactions
B+ → J/ψ( → μμ) K+ Bs
→ J/ψ(→ μμ) φ( → K
+K–) Bd → K+π–
BR(Bs μμ) < 4.3(5.6) x 10-8 @ 90(95)% CL [Exp. 6.5 x 10-8 @ 95% CL] BR(Bd μμ) < 1.2(1.5) x 10-8 @ 90(95)% CL [Exp. 1.8 x 10-8 @ 95% CL]
Already close to best Tevatron limits
First observation of B0s D0 K*0
First observation of B0s J/ψ f0
Nsignal = (111 ± 14) events
12.8 σ significance
Probes of CP-violating new physics effects in oscillation box diagramsB0
s-B0s mixing phase measured using B0
s J/ψ φ, B0s J/ψ f0
Probes of CP-violating new physics effects in so far unexplored penguin diagrams in Bs system CP asymmetries measured in B0
s φ φ and B0s K*0 K*0
First observation of B0s K*0 K*0
Nsignal = (34.5 ± 7.4) events
7.37 σ significance
ALICE (IP-2) A Large Ion Collider Experiment
ALICE
B. Guerzoni, IFAE 2011, 27-29 April 2011P. Giubellino, CERN RRB, April 2011A.Dainese, Rencontres de Physique, La Thuile, March 2011
Detector optimized for the study of nuclear collisions at extreme energies with thousands of low momentum particles/event are produced
B = 0.5 TLarge tracking system to allow chargedparticle track reconstruction with ~150 points/trackA powerful and large system of particle identification (PID) detectorsSingle arm muon spectrometer in the forward region
Length: 26 mHeight: 16 mWidth: 16 mWeight: 10000 t
Results in PbPb:Multiplicity, flow, high-pT
suppression, di-hadron correlations, strangeness and heavy flavours, quarkonia, …
Results in pp:Multiplicity, pT
spectra, correlations, strangeness, heavy flavours, particle ratios …
Space‐time Evolution of the Collisions
eγ
space
time jet
Hard Scattering + Thermalization(< 1 fm/c)
PbPb→
Expan
sion
→ Hadronization particle composition is fixed (no more inel. Collisions)
p K πφ
Freeze-out(~ 10 fm/c) (no more elastic collisions)
Λμ
QGP (~ few fm/c)
γ e
Quark Gluon Coloured World QGCW
commonly called QGP
Quark Gluon Plasma
Deconfinement (Tc ~170 MeV) in PbPb
How hot is it? 100 000 times the temperature at the center of the Sun
PID performance
π K p
e
TPC + TOF
TOF
TOFTPC
Charged-particle multiplicity measurement in proton-protoncollisions in the central rapidity / pseudorapidity regionpp @ √s= 0.9, 2.36, 7 TeV
pp collisions
Energy density from dNch/dηLHC PbPb @ √sNN
=2.76 TeV
dNch /dη = 1599 ± 4(stat) ± 80(syst)
100 times cold nuclear matter density
~3 times the density reached at RHIC AuAu @ √sNN
=0.2 TeV(ε ≈ 15 GeV/fm3)
Central PbPb collisions
Volume and lifetime from Hanbury-Brown & Twiss (HBT) interferometry
freeze-out volume ~300 fm3
~2 times the volume measured at RHIC AuAu @ √sNN
=0.2 TeVlifetime up to freeze-out ~10 fm/c
Volume
Lifetime
Jet quenching in PbPbRatio RAA =
n. of particles in AA (PbPb) collision per NN (binary) collision
n. of particles per pp collision
Strong suppression of high-pT hadrons in PbPb collisionsparton energy loss: jet quenching
New feature: evolution of RAA as a function of pTNew constraint for parton energy-loss models
Elliptic flow in Pb-Pb at 2.76 TeV
Collective behavior observed in Pb-Pb collisions at LHC
Similar to RHIC almost ideal fluid at LHC ?
New input to the energy dependence of collective flow
Di-hadron correlations in PbPb and “ridge”
Low / intermediate pTnear-side “ridge” in Δηbroad, flat away-side
study ridge evolution, hydrodynamics vs. quenching
High pTnear-side dominates but no ridgequenching / suppression on away-side
study parton energy loss
AzimuthalCorrelation~ 180 deg
AzimuthalCorrelation~ 180 deg
Leading particle
Leading particle
~ Low pT
High pTAway-side correlation at LHC seems weaker than at RHIC …
Di-hadron correlation powerful tool to study medium
Anti-Alpha 4He candidates in PbPb
Thank you for your attention
Thanks to F. Bellini and B. GuerzoniPbPb √sNN
= 2.76 TeV
ATLAS pp @ 7 TeV
Study of Jet Quenching in HI collisions at CMS
arXiv:1102.1957
For pT >120 GeV/c in central PbPb collisions at √sNN
=2.76 TeV a factor 2 suppression of balanced di‐ jets is observed ‐> recoiling jets interact significantly with the medium
CMSp-p@7 TeV