The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

44
The Language of Leadership Caroline Simard, PhD Research Director

Transcript of The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

Page 1: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

The Language of Leadership

Caroline Simard, PhD Research Director

Page 2: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Underrepresentation of women in leadership

•  Approximately 4.5% of the Fortune 500 CEOs are women.

•  Women hold 14% of executive officer positions.

•  Women hold 18% of elected congressional offices.

•  Women hold 17.2% of research university presidencies.

•  Women of color are more underrepresented.

Correll, 2014.

Page 3: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Bias: Cognitive Function

Page 4: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Bias is an error in decision making.

Page 5: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes are the content of bias

Stereotypes are generalized

beliefs about a particular group or class of people.

Page 6: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes function as “cognitive shortcuts.”

Page 7: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

What are some of the stereotypes about technologists?

Page 8: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

How do we block bias?

Page 9: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

“Recognize that we didn’t create this, but we can fix it.”

Megan Smith CTO, United States of America

Page 10: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

We can debug processes and block bias.

Page 11: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

(Correll 2014; Goldin and Rouse, 2000)

Page 12: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

(Correll 2014; Goldin and Rouse, 2000)

Page 13: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes affect the standard we use to evaluate

the performance of individuals.

Page 14: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

79% 49%

Brian Miller Karen Miller

Correll, 2013; Steinpreis, Anders & Ritzke 1999.

Page 15: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Extra Scrutiny

“I would need to see evidence that she had gotten these grants and publications on her own.”

“It would be impossible to make such a judgment without teaching evaluations.”

Correll, 2013; Steinpreis, Anders & Ritzke 1999.

Page 16: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Stereotypes affect the criteria we use to evaluate the

performance of individuals.

Page 17: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

More education

Uhlmann & Cohen 2005

More experience

✔ © Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Page 18: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

More education More experience

✔ © Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Uhlmann & Cohen 2005

Page 19: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

More experience More education

✔ © Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Uhlmann & Cohen 2005

Page 20: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

How do you see the unseen?

Page 21: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

The most common way that we transmit and maintain

culture is through language.

Page 22: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Language of Competence

Team player

Friendly

Good relationship manager

Committed

Big thinker

Influences others

Takes risks

Independent

Description A Description B

COMMUNAL AGENTIC

Page 23: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Language of Competence

c

Communal Language

Agentic Language

Page 24: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Communal Agentic

Supportive Team Player

Helpful Friendly

Thoughtful

Collaborative Committed

Caring Tactical

Hardworking

Relationship builder

Confident Strategic

Ambitious Outspoken

Independent

Risk-taker Entrepreneurial

Driver Influential

Go-getter

Innovator

Page 25: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

And finally, a special thank you to Lori. You won't be surprised to know that she threw herself into this project with tireless dedication, good spirits and the gentle touch that is needed to coordinate so many big personalities.

Page 26: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

And finally, a special thank you to Lori. You won't be surprised to know that she threw herself into this project with tireless dedication, good spirits and the gentle touch that is needed to coordinate so many big personalities.

Page 27: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

Advocacy and Sponsorship to create conditions for performance

Power of Introductions

Page 28: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Rudman 1998

More Competent

More Competent

Less likeable

Page 29: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Women who are seen as competent suffer a likability penalty. A woman who is successful in a stereotypically male job is seen as less likable, less attractive, less happy, and less socially desirable. Successful female managers are seen as more deceitful, pushy, selfish, and abrasive than successful male managers.

The Double Bind

Yoder and Schleicher, 1996; Heilman, et al, 2004

Page 30: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Advocacy and Sponsorship “No one leans in more than the Clayman Institute. I have had the privilege and honor of working with Shelley and Lori. I believe strongly in leadership. I’ve never met better leaders. They believe in gender equality. They understand how you take academic research and make it apply. And they will stop at nothing to change this world. And it is an honor and a privilege to be able to partner with you.” Sheryl Sandberg

Page 31: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of Technical Competence in Interviews

“Yeah, she can code, but she can’t convince me about her decisions.”

“She asked a lot of questions. I can’t spend all my time babysitting her.”

Page 32: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Separate style from the evaluation of

technical competence.

Page 33: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Language of Technical Competence

Toolkit

1.  Separate Style from Technical Competence

Technical Competence Cultural Fit & Style Coding ability

Style: Ability to Convince

Page 34: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Notice when higher or different standards

are used to evaluate the performance of certain

individuals.

Page 35: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Language of Technical Competence

Toolkit

1.  Separate Style from Technical Competence

2.  Notice Higher or Different Standards and Insist on Universal Application of Standards

Technical Competence Cultural Fit & Style Coding ability

Style: Ability to Convince

Use this criteria for all candidates

Page 36: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

“Super Positive/Can Do attitude. People enjoy working with (person).”

“(Person) has created a forum which enables greater visibility and collaboration across the many complex initiatives in flight.”

Page 37: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

“Super Positive/Can Do attitude. People enjoy working with (her).”

“(He) has created a forum which enables greater visibility and collaboration across the many complex initiatives in flight.”

Page 38: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Separate personality from feedback and focus on

accomplishments.

Page 39: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Language of Technical Competence

Toolkit

1.  Separate Style from Technical Competence

2.  Notice Higher or Different Standards and Insist on Universal Application of Standards

3.  Separate Personality from Feedback and Focus on Accomplishments

Page 40: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Criticism of Personality

“You can come across as abrasive sometimes. I know you don’t mean to, but you need to pay attention to your tone.”

(Fortune 2014)

© Lori Mackenzie 2015. All rights reserved.

Page 41: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Critical Feedback (Personality/Style)

(Fortune, 2014)

Page 42: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Activity

Write an introduction/advocacy statement for a woman or for yourself.

•  Pay attention to the language of competence and technical competence.

•  Focus on accomplishments and expertise.

Page 43: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

Action for tomorrow

Toolkit

1.  Write an introduction statement for yourself using balanced language

2.  Advocate on other women’s behalf using the language of leadership

3.  Block Undue Criticism of Women’s Personality

4.  Establish Clear Criteria in evaluating talent

Page 44: The Language of Leadership - Voices 2015

© Stanford University 2014. All rights reserved.

What’s Next?