The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06...

7
Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention www.hogrefe.com/journals/crisis ISSN-L 0227-5910 · ISSN-Print 0227-5910 · ISSN-Online 2151-2396 Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention Editor-in-Chief Diego De Leo Associate Editors Maria A. Oquendo · Ella Arensman Published under the Auspices of the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP)

Transcript of The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06...

Page 1: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

Crisis The Jou

rnal of C

risis Interven

tion an

d Suicid

e Prevention

www.hogrefe.com/journals/crisis

ISSN-L 0227-5910 · ISSN-Print 0227-5910 · ISSN-Online 2151-2396

Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention

Editor-in-Chief Diego De Leo

Associate Editors Maria A. Oquendo · Ella Arensman

Published under the Auspices of the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP)

Page 2: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

Published under the Auspices of the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP)

Your article has appeared in a journal published by Hogrefe Publishing. This e-offprint is provided exclusively for the personal use of the authors. It may not be posted on a personal or institutional website or to an institutional or disciplinary repository.

If you wish to post the article to your personal or institutional website or to archive it in an institutional or disciplinary repository, please use either a pre-print or a post-print of your manuscript in accordance with the publication release for your article and our “Online Rights for Journal Articles” (www.hogrefe.com/journals).

Page 3: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

© 2016 Hogrefe Publishing Crisis 2016DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000371

Short Report

MYPLAN – A Mobile Phone Application for Supporting People at

Risk of Suicide Jette L. Skovgaard Larsen1, Hanne Frandsen1,

and Annette Erlangsen2,3

1Competence Centre for Suicide Prevention, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark2Suicide Prevention Research, Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen,

Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark3Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract. Background: Safety plans have been suggested as an intervention for people at risk of suicide. Given the impulsive character of suicidal ideation, a safety plan in the format of a mobile phone application is likely to be more available and useful than traditional paper versions. Aims: The study describes MYPLAN, a mobile phone application designed to support people at risk of suicide by letting them create a safety plan. Method: MYPLAN was developed in collaboration with clinical psychiatric staff at Danish suicide preventive clinics. The mobile application lets the user create an individualized safety plan by filling in templates with strategies, actions, and direct links to contact persons. Results: MYPLAN was developed in 2013 and is freely available in Denmark and Norway. It is designed for iPhone and android platforms. As of December 2015, the application has been downloaded almost 8,000 times. Users at risk of suicide as well as clinical staff have provided positive feedback on the mobile application. Conclusion: Support via mobile phone applications might be particularly useful for younger age groups at risk of suicide as well as in areas or countries where support options are lacking. Yet, it is important to examine the effectiveness of this type of intervention.

Keywords: mobile phone applications, suicide prevention, safety plan

Prevention of deliberate self-harm and death by suicide is challenging and evidence on effective interventions is lim-ited (Hawton et al., 2003; Mann et al., 2005).

Although people with a history of deliberate self-harm are at elevated risk of repeating (Owens, Horrocks, & House, 2002), brief but efficient interventions for this group are lacking (Hawton et al., 2003; Kapur, Cooper, Bennew-ith, Gunnell, & Hawton, 2010). Different strategies, such as postcard reminders (Beautrais, Gibb, Faulkner, Fer-gusson, & Mulder, 2010; Kapur et al., 2013), easy access through green cards (Evans, Evans, Morgan, Hayward, & Gunnell, 2005; Wilhelm et al., 2007), no-suicide contracts (Rudd, Mandrusiak, & Joiner, 2015; Stanford, Goetz, & Bloom, 2006), safety plans (Stanley & Brown, 2012), and web-based cognitive therapy (van Spijker, van Straten, & Kerkhof, 2010) have been examined. Yet, only few have been shown to have an impact (Stanley & Brown, 2012; van Spijker, van Straten, & Kerkhof, 2014).

Stanley and Brown (2012) developed a safety planning tool intented as a brief intervention for people presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suicidality. The safety plan consists of writing down personalized strate-gies for how to handle a suicidal crisis. Together with the patient, the clinician identifies warning signs of when a

suicidal crisis is underway and which coping strategies have previously worked or might work. A list of family or friends with their phone numbers and addresses of profes-sionals who may help are added to the plan. The patient re-ceives the paper with the safety plan and would ideally re-sort to it in times of crisis (Stanley & Brown, 2012). While not a part of the original safety plan intervention, having a safety application (app) on one’s smartphone implies that it is likely accessible at most times.

Furthermore, a mobile phone app may enable therapeu-tic support to a large number of individuals who would oth-erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De Serres, & Leblanc, 2013). The World Health Organization (WHO) have recommended mobile devices as an option for providing support and therapy to people at risk of suicide (WHO, 2014). The potential of reaching many individuals through already implemented electronic devices at relative-ly low costs is evident. An app intervention might also be of great use in developing countries where support to people at risk of suicide may be limited (Fleischmann et al., 2008).

Suicidal behavior, in terms of deliberate self-harm, is particularly prevalent among younger age groups (Mort-horst, Søgaard, Nordentoft, & Erlangsen, in press). More-over, young people are avid users of smartphones and

Author's personal copy (e-offprint)

Page 4: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

J. L. Skovgaard Larsen et al.: MYPLAN: An App for People at Risk of Suicide2

© 2016 Hogrefe PublishingCrisis 2016

tablets (Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, & Zickuhr, 2010). The aim of this study is to describe the electronic safety plan MYPLAN.

MYPLAN

MYPLAN is a suicide safety plan in the form of an app (Larsen, 2015). As with the original paper edition (Stanley & Brown, 2012), MYPLAN was created with the intention of being a self-help tool for the management of suicidal crises. By being readily available, the app intends to en-hance feelings of being safe both for the user as well as their family and friends. In addition, the app is designed to increase awareness of crisis symptoms by improving recognition of these and establishing the user’s own expe-rience with self-help skills.

As shown in Figure 1, the app consists of a menu with seven items: (a) My Symptoms, where personal signs of crisis can be entered; (b) Strategies and Solutions, where one’s own coping strategies for crisis situations can be list-ed; (c) Network, where contact persons are included; (d)

Nearest Emergency Department, which guides the user to the nearest psychiatric ED by display of map directions and telephone numbers; (e) Lifeline and (f) Children’s Hotline, which both provide direct links to organizations where the user can seek help; and (g) About MYPLAN, which provides specifics regarding the app.

Items a–c are empty upon installation. The user fills in details on their own symptoms of crisis, coping strategies, and contact persons aided by a simple template explaining how these sections should be filled in. Different symptoms, coping strategies, and contact details can be inter-linked and the user can set up links to music or pictures. There are no limits to the number of entries. Also, the entered in-formation may at any time be removed or edited. Items d–f are fixed and provide information on where to seek help.

Editions and Availability

MYPLAN was developed in 2013 by Jette L. S. Larsen. It was first released in October 2013 for iPhone. Later, improved versions of MYPLAN were developed and the

Figure 1. Screenshots of MYPLAN

Author's personal copy (e-offprint)

Page 5: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

J. L. Skovgaard Larsen et al.: MYPLAN: An App for People at Risk of Suicide 3

© 2016 Hogrefe Publishing Crisis 2016

current version can be used on several platforms, such as android phones and tablets. The main focus has been to make the application as simple and easy to use as possi-ble. Improvements to the app have been discussed with the clinical staff at the Danish suicide preventive clinics and volunteer organizations supporting people affected by su-icidal behavior.

MYPLAN was adapted and translated into Norwegian. It was launched in Norway as part of the Norwegian Pa-tient Safety Program In Safe Hands in September 2014 (Office of the Norwegian Patient Safety Programme, 2014; Sørland Hospital, 2014). In addition to the existing fea-tures, the Norwegian version includes a nationwide list-ing of contact details on general practitioners, which are linked to a map function.

MYPLAN is available free of charge and advertising both in Denmark and Norway. As of December 2015, it has been downloaded 4,450 times in Denmark and 4,070 times in Norway.

Clinical Experience

As part of the treatment in the Danish suicide preventive clinics, patients are encouraged to develop their own indi-vidual safety plan. This is listed in clinical guidelines and

mandatory for all patients. Previously, safety plans were written on paper, implying that it was either carried around or stored at home. Clinicians at the suicide preventive clin-ics are now increasingly using the app instead of the paper version. Given that the staff is already familiar with the concept of a safety plan, no actual manual has been devel-oped for MYPLAN. Instead, explanations are incorporated in the app intended for the novice user. Clinicians have reported positively on their experiences with the app. In general, they stated that it is easy to use and readily accept-ed by the patients. In some clinics, MYPLAN is now the preferred safety plan tool.

One challenge is that approximately one in ten patients in the suicide preventive clinics is an older adult who does not use smartphone apps. Paper versions are still used for these patients.

Patients have responded positively to MYPLAN, which they take home and continue to develop. Clinicians have observed that filling in information on contact per-sons also allows the user to get an overview of their net-work for critical situations, that is, who they can talk to about their illness and thoughts. This might also further strengthen their social relationships.

The app is intended for users at risk of suicide; the pa-tients attending the suicide preventive clinics, thus, consti-tute a target group. The quotes in Figure 2 are from per-sons recruited to MYPLAN from one of the clinics. It has

Figure 2. Quotes from users of MYPLAN (translated by the authors)Note. SI = suicidal ideation. DSH = deliberate self-harm.

Author's personal copy (e-offprint)

Page 6: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

J. L. Skovgaard Larsen et al.: MYPLAN: An App for People at Risk of Suicide4

© 2016 Hogrefe PublishingCrisis 2016

been noted that MYPLAN helps patients take ownership of their crisis strategies and that the patients report actu-ally having used the app in critical situations. One patient mentioned: “I am constantly reminded that I need to dis-tract and realign myself when the dark thoughts come.” A young man said: “I read my safety plan every morning on the train to work.”

MYPLAN is developed with the aim of being an add-on to professional treatment, for instance, a new feature allows users to e-mail updates of their safety plan as a PDF file to their therapists. However, MYPLAN can also be employed as a self-help tool.

Internationally, numerous apps are dedicated to the prevention of suicide (Aguirre, McCoy, & Roan, 2015). Most apps provide direct links to suicide hotlines. Many are noninteractive with the main purpose of providing specific information on warning signs and advice on how to ask about suicidal thoughts, for example, Suicide Life-guard, Help, Ask, and Suicide? –Help! (Angus Coun-cil and Dundee City Council, 2015; Help, 2015; Mental Health America of Texas, 2015; National Suicide Preven-tion Lifeline, 2015). Others, such as Relief Link, MY3, and OnTrckAgn (Kaslow, 2015; Link2HealthSolutions Inc., 2015; Vanhove, 2015), include interactive elements, such as mood tracker, safety plan, or inclusion of contacts that can be added as resources. These features resemble, and exceed, MYPLAN by allowing individualization al-beit no geo-mapping of EDs. Seemingly, none of the apps use a cloud solution, that is, allowing for data storage via the Internet, to further enhance the app’s functions.

Strengths and Limitations

The main advantage of an electronic safety plan is that us-ers will have it with them at most times. The majority of the target group are younger persons who are used to apps and have little trouble individualizing the safety plan. The clinical experience, based on case reports, indicates that users take ownership and find MYPLAN easy to use. The app is also an alternative for persons at risk of suicide who either prefer relying on self-help or do not have access to therapeutic support. Furthermore, the app can be translat-ed and adjusted to other languages and settings relatively easily.

Not all persons at risk of suicide have access to or are familiar with smartphones, which is a limitation to the app’s usability. It is possible that the introduction to MY-PLAN by a therapist helping with setting up the app in-creases the likelihood of it being used. This could imply that people outside therapeutic settings are less likely to benefit from the app’s features. The main limitation of the app is that we do not know if it actually prevents suicid-al behavior. As with other apps focusing on mental health care (Labelle et al., 2013), the effectiveness of these inter-ventions remains to be examined.

Future Plans

A new version of MYPLAN is planned as a cloud solution, allowing for extended tracking and sharing options. This will also allow for the collection of user data for research purposes and extend treatment options as well as support to relatives. The next version’s improvements will be se-lected after feedback from a user panel. It is planned to test the effectiveness of the app in a randomized clinical trial.

Conclusion

Mobile applications are easily accessible to people, par-ticularly young persons. They also present advantages as a platform for therapeutic support in places where such services are distant or absent. The crisis tool MYPLAN has been well received by clinicians and users at risk of suicide. The predominantly young users report that it is easy to operate and that they use it regularly. Still, an ev-idence-based evaluation of MYPLAN’s ability to reduce suicidal ideation and facilitate contact when persons are in crisis has yet to be conducted.

Acknowledgments

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

Aguirre, R. T. P., McCoy, M. K., & Roan, M. (2015). Develop-ment guidelines from a study of suicide prevention mobile application. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 31, 269–293.

Angus Council and Dundee City Council. (2015). Suicide? Help! Angus and Dundee, UK: Author.

Beautrais, A. L., Gibb, S. J., Faulkner, A., Fergusson, D. M., & Mulder, R. T. (2010). Postcard intervention for repeat self-harm: Randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psy-chiatry, 197, 55–60.

Evans, J., Evans, M., Morgan, H. G., Hayward, A., & Gunnell, D. (2005). Crisis card following self-harm: 12-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Britihs Journal of Psychia-try, 187, 186–187.

Fleischmann, A., Bertolote, J. M., Wasserman, D., De Leo, D., Bolhari, J., Botega, N. J., … Thanh, H. T. (2008). Effective-ness of brief intervention and contact for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled trial in five countries. Bulletin of theWorld Health Organization, 86, 703–709.

Hawton, K., Townsend, E., Arensman, E., Gunnell, D., Hazell, P., House, A., & Heeringen, K. (2003). Psychosocial and phar-macological treatments for deliberate self harm. Cochrane review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD001764. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001764

Help. (2015). Heartline, National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, Oklahoma, USA. Retrieved from http://www.suicidepreven-tionlifeline.org

Kapur, N., Cooper, J., Bennewith, O., Gunnell, D., & Hawton, K. (2010). Postcards, green cards and telephone calls: Ther-

Author's personal copy (e-offprint)

Page 7: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention › wp-content › uploads › 2016 › 06 › Crisis-Mypla… · erwise not be able to draw on support (Labelle, Bibaud-De

J. L. Skovgaard Larsen et al.: MYPLAN: An App for People at Risk of Suicide 5

© 2016 Hogrefe Publishing Crisis 2016

apeutic contact with individuals following self-harm. British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 5–7.

Kapur, N., Gunnell, D., Hawton, K., Nadeem, S., Khalil, S., Longson, D., … Cooper, J. (2013). Messages from Manches-ter: Pilot randomised controlled trial following self-harm. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 73–74.

Kaslow, N. (2015). Relief Link. Emory University, USA. Re- trieved from http://www.ibridgenetwork.org/emory/relieflink- a-suicide-prevention-app

Labelle, R., Bibaud-De Serres, A., & Leblanc, F. (2013). Inno-vation to treat depression and prevent suicide: The IPhone @PSY ASSISTANCE application. In B. Mishara & A. J. F. M. Kerkhof (Eds.), Suicide prevention and new technologies: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmil-lan.

Larsen, J. L. S. (2015). MYPLAN. Mental Health Centre Copen-hagen, Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.minplan.org/

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Link2HealthSolutions Inc. (2015). MY3. National Suicide Pre-vention Lifeline and California Mental Health Services, USA. Retrieved from http://www.calmhsa.org

Mann, J. J., Apter, A., Bertolote, J. M., Beautrais, A., Currier, D., Haas, A. P., … Hendin, H. (2005). Suicide prevention strat-egies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 2064–2074.

Mental Health America of Texas. (2015). ASK about suicide to save a life. Mental Health America of Texas, USA. Retrieved from http://www.texassuicideprevention.org/information-li-brary/app-promotions/

Morthorst, B., Søgaard, B., Nordentoft, M., & Erlangsen, A. (in press). Nationwide incidence rates of suicide attempt and probable suicide attempts in Denmark during 1994–2011. Manuscript submitted for publication. Crisis.

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. (2015). Suicide lifeguard. Retrieved from http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org

Office of the Norwegian Patient Safety Programme. (2014). The Norwegian patient safety programme: In safe hands. Re- trieved from http://www.pasientsikkerhetsprogrammet.no/no/ I+trygge+hender/In+English

Owens, D., Horrocks, J., & House, A. (2002). Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm. Systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 193–199.

Rudd, M. D., Mandrusiak, M., & Joiner, T. E. (2015). The case against no-suicide contracts: The commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative. Journal of Clinical Psy-chiatry, 62, 243–251.

Sørland Hospital. (2014). Sørlandet sykehus lanserer app som kan redde liv [Sørlandet Hospital launch an app that can save lives]. Sørland, Norway: Author. Retrieved from http://www.sshf.no/aktuelt_/nyheter_/Sider/S%C3%B8rlandet-sykehus-lanserer-app-som-kan-redde-liv.aspx

Stanford, E. J., Goetz, R. R., & Bloom, J. D. (2006). The no-harm contract in the emergency assessment of suicidal risk. Jour-nal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55, 344–348.

Stanley, B., & Brown, G. K. (2012). Safety planning interven-tion: A brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19, 256–264.

van Spijker, B. A., van Straten, A., & Kerkhof, A. J. (2010). The effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention to reduce suicidal thoughts: A randomized controlled trial. Trials, 11, 25.

van Spijker, B. A., van Straten, A., & Kerkhof, A. J. (2014). Ef-fectiveness of online self-help for suicidal thoughts: Results of a randomised controlled trial. PLoS.One., 9, e90118.

Vanhove, R. (2015). OnTrckAgn. Zorg voor suïcidepogers. [On TrckAgn. Support for people after self-harm] Retrieved from http://www.ontrackagain.be/

Wilhelm, K., Finch, A., Kotze, B., Arnold, K., McDonald, G., Sternhell, P., & Hudson, B. (2007). The Green Card Clinic: Overview of a brief patient-centred intervention following deliberate self-harm. Australasian Psychiatry, 15, 35–41.

World Health Organization. (2014). Preventing suicide: A global imperative. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Received January 23, 2015 Revision received September 8, 2015 Accepted September 15, 2015 Published online February 2, 2016

About the authors

Jette L. Skovgaard Larsen is an entrepreneur and works for the Human Resource Centre of the Capital Region of Denmark. She developed and programmed the mobile phone application, MY-PLAN, as a personal project and has since drawn on professional competences to further enhance the app.

Hanne Frandsen is a certified clinical nurse and leader of the re-gional Suicide Preventive Clinic for Adults in Copenhagen area, Denmark. She holds profound and extended clinical experience with psychosocial therapy directed at people at risk of suicide.

Annette Erlangsen, PhD, is associate professor and program leader for Research on Suicide Prevention at the Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Denmark. Her research focus is on risk populations and interventions using register data. She is currently Secretary–Treasurer of the International Academy of Suicide Research.

Annette Erlangsen

Mental Health Centre CopenhagenBispebjerg Bakke 23, indgang 13A2400 Copenhagen NVDenmarkTel. +45 4026-3918E-mail [email protected]

Author's personal copy (e-offprint)