THE JOURNAL OF BIOIDGICAL CHEMISTRY 0 1993 by The American Society for ’ Biochemistry and Molecular ’ Biolow, Inc.

Vol. 268, No. 34, Iesue of December 5 , pp. 25350-25356, 1993 Printed in U S A .

Chemotactic Methyltransferase Promotes Adaptation to Repellents in Bacillus subtilis”

(Received for publication, June 25, 1993, and in revised form, August 5, 1993)

Michael L. Kirsch$, Aamir R. ZuberiSP, Dennis Hennerll, Pierette D. Peters$, Mohammed k Yazdill**, and George W. OrdalS $$ From the Wepartment of Biochemistry, Colleges of Medicine and Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, ICell Genetics Department, Genentech Inc., South Sun Francisco, California 94080, and lllepartment of Microbiology, University of Shefield, Shefield, United Kingdom

Bacillus subtilis cheRE, which encodes the chemotac- tic methyltransferase, has been cloned and sequenced. CheRB is a polypeptide of 256 amino acids, with a pre- dicted molecular mass of 28 kDa. A comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence of B. subtilis CheRB with that of Escherichia coli CheRE demonstrates that the two enzymes share 31% amino acid identity. The homol- ogy was functional in that the expression of che& in an E. coli cheRE null mutant made the bacteria Che’. In contrast to cheRE null mutants which show a strong smooth swimming bias, che& null mutants were pre- dominantly tumbly. They respond to the addition and subsequent removal of attractant. They also respond to the addition of repellent but do not adapt; they resume prestimulus bias on removal of repellent. Tethering analysis of a culture of a cheRE null mutant revealed two distinct subpopulations, each demonstrating unique be- haviors. One showed a strong clockwise flagellar rota- tion bias, whereas the other was more random. The lat- ter phenotype may be due to a deficiency of CheB and may reflect an interaction of CheB and CheR. Measure- menta of CheB activity in the cheR null mutant showed them to be only 20% of wild type levels. We conclude from this work that CheRB functions to promote adap- tation to repellent stimuli in B. subtilis, whereas CheRE functions to promote adaptation to attractant stimuli in E. coli.

Many of the chemotactic proteins of Escherichia coli have homologs in Bacillus subtilis, and most are encoded by genes in the major chelfla operon (Zuberi et al., 1990; Bischoff and Ordal, 1992). These include cheA, cheB, chew, and cheY (Bour- ret et al., 1991). No B. subtilis homolog to cheZ has been iden- tified. This operon also encodes other motility-related proteins (Bischoff and Ordal, 1992). E. coli and B. subtilis also have homologous methyltransferases (CheR) which catalyze the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine to the chemotactic receptors, the methyl-accepting chemotaxis pro-

* This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant AI20336 from the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

to the GenBankTMIEMBL Data Bank with accession nunbeds) X73681. The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted

J Present address: The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME 04609. ** Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, Clayton Foundation Bio-

$$ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 217-333-9098; chemical Institute, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712.

Fax: 217-333-8868.

teins (MCPs)’ (Burgess-Cassler et al., 1982; Simms et al., 1987). The B. subtilis CheR protein (CheRB) has been purified to homogeneity. I t was found to be a monomer with a molecular weight of 30,000 by gel filtration chromatography and has a K,,, for S-adenosylmethionine of about 5 p~ (Burgess-Cassler et al., 1982). The methyltransferases from both E. coli and B. subtilis are able to methylate the heterologous MCPs i n vitro (Burgess- Cassler and Ordal, 1982). In contrast to most of the chemotaxis genes of B. subtilis, cheRB is located near aroF, a locus distinct from the major chelfta operon, which is betweenpyrD and thyA (Ordal et al., 1983).

CheRB is known to be required for chemotaxis inasmuch as a point mutant, 011100, showed poor chemotaxis toward at- tractants as measured in a capillary assay. The specific role that cheRB plays has been unclear. The behavior of 011100 as determined by microscopic observation is markedly different than cheRE mutants from E. coli; 011100 appears to swim randomly, whereas the cheRE mutants are smooth swimming.

In E. coli, repellent stimuli act through the MCPs to activate CheAE, which then donates phosphate groups to CheYE, the tumble regulator, and CheBE, the methylesterase. Phospho- rylated CheBE is activated to remove methyl groups from the MCPs which brings these receptors back to a prestimulus sig- naling state. Upon the removal of repellents, CheAE kinase activity decreases which leads to lower levels of phosphorylated CheBE. Consequently, CheBE activity decreases so that CheRE can then replace the methyl groups removed by CheBE. Thus CheBE is the enzyme responsible for the adaptation to negative stimuli and CheRE is responsible for the adaptation to positive stimuli.

The study of chemotaxis in B. subtilis has unveiled several striking differences with E, coli. In both organisms CheA is believed to phosphorylate CheY (Hess et al., 1988; Fuhrer and Ordal, 1991), which in turn regulates the direction of flagellar rotation. However, null mutants in cheA and in cheY are tum- bly in B. subtilis but smooth swimming in E. coli (Fuhrer and Ordal, 1991; Bischoff and Ordal, 1991; Oosawa et al., 1988; Parkinson, 1978). In both organisms, methylation of the MCPs causes adaptation to chemoeffectors. However, removal of methyl groups from the MCPs by the methylesterase, CheB, results in adaptation to attractant in B. subtilis, but adaptation to repellent in E. coli. (Kirsch et al., 1993; Hiroyuki et al., 1983). Thus, in these respects, chemotaxis in B. subtilis is “opposite” to that in E. coli. In this article, we report the cloning and sequencing of cheRB and demonstrate that CheRB is the en- zyme responsible for the adaptation to repellents in B. subtilis chemotaxis.

1 The abbreviations used are: MCP, methyl-accepting chemotaxis pro- tein; CW, clockwise; CCW, counterclockwise.

25350

B. subtilis Chemotactic Methyltransferase 25351

TABLE I Strains and plasmids

Strain or Relevant genotype plasmid or description

Source or reference

E. coli RP437 RP1254 RP3098 012697 012698 012714

B. subtilis 011085 011100 012652 012680 012681 012682 012836 013017 013020 013041

Plasmids pEB112 pJHlOl pT7-6

pUC 18 pAZ285 pAZ286 pAZ291

pAZ294

pMK108

Che' cheR m5S13 A(flbB-flaH) RP437(pAZ283) RP1254(pAZ283) RP3098(pAZ283)

Che' cheR cheR::cat 011085(pAZ286) cheR 011085(pAZ291) Che' 011085(pAZ294) Che' cheB::cat cheB/cheR::cat OI3017(pMK108) OI2680(pMK108)

B. subtilis expression vector

E. coli expression plasmid with cloned insert under the Integration plasmid

Cloning vector cheRB subcloned into pUB18 DraI fragment of cheR subcloned into pJHlOl DraYEcoRV fragment containing the terminator of cheR

subcloned into pUC19 BstWDraI fragment containing the promoter region of

cheR subcloned into pUC19 cheBB subcloned into pEB112

control of T7 promoter, amp'

Parkinson ( 1978) J. S. Parkinson J. S. Parkinson This work This work This work

Ullah and Ordal, 1981 Burgess-Cassler et al. (1982) This work This work This work This work Kirsch et al. (1993) This work This work This work

Leonhardt and Alonson (1988) Ferrari et al. (1983) Tabor and Richardson (1985)

Yanisch-Perron et al. ( 1985) This work This work This work

This work

Kirsch et al. (1993)

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Bacterial Strains and Plasmids-The bacterial strains and plasmids

used in this investigation are described in Table I. Growth Media-Tryptone broth (TBr) is 1% Tryptone and 0.5% NaCl.

LBr is 1% Tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 0.5% NaCI. Minimal me- dium is 50 rm potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1 w MgCI,, 1 r m (NHJSO,, 0.14 rm CaCl,, 0.01 m~ MnCI,, 50 pg/d required amino acids (His, Met, Trp), and 20 r m sorbitol.

Cloning of cheR-A 6.3-kilobase fragment of B. subtilis DNA con- taining thegerC, aroB, and trpC loci was cloned (Yazdi and Moir, 1990).

DNA Sequence and Analysis-DNA sequencing was done by the dideoxynucleotide-chain termination method (Sanger et al., 1977) with the Sequenase kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) and [36SldATP (Amersham Corp.). Analyses of DNA sequences and homology alignments were per- formed using DNASTAR. Since we were able to recover clones with cheR, inserted into M13 and pUC vectors in only one orientation, oli- gonucleotide primers were designed from the sequence derived from the one strand to facilitate double stranded sequencing of the opposite strand.

Mutagenesis and Analysis-Integration analysis (Piggot et al., 1984) was performed by subcloning DNA fragments containing incomplete regions of chRB into integration plasmids (Table I) and subsequently transforming wild type B. subtilis. Ache& mutant strain, 012680, was created by the integration of pAZ286 (Table I) into 011085. Southern hybridization analysis was performed to verib the integration of each plasmid. Another c ~ R B mutant (012652) was created by the replace- ment of the internal DraI fragment with a promoterless chloramphen- icol resistance marker (chloramphenicol acetyl transferase, cat gene) (Corarmblas and Bolivar, 1982). The ability to perform normal chemo- tactic functions was determined by capillary assays (Ordal and Gold- man, 1975) and in vivo methylation (Ullah and Ordal, 1981).

Complementation of cheR Mutants-Complementation of the mu- tants was performed by transforming competent cells with the appro- priate plasmids. Complementation was assayed on semisolid agar swarm plates containing 0.27% agar. 1 m~ isopropylthiogalactoside was added to induce the expression of cheBB from pMKlO8. The swarm plates were incubated for 6 h at 37 "C for B. subtilis cells and for 9 h at 30 "C for E. coli cells. The swarm size of the complemented strain was compared to that of the wild type.

Capillary Assay-Capillary assays have been described (Ordal and Goldman, 1975). Cells were grown overnight on tryptose blood agar

plates. IO8 bacteridml were then inoculated into 1 ml of TBr, diluted 150 into minimal media, and grown for 4 h at 37 "C. Cells were then supplemented with 0.05% glycerol and 5 lll~ sodium lactate, grown 15 min longer, and harvested. They were resuspended at AGm = 0.001 and assayed for chemotaxis using azetidine-2-carboxylic acid as the attract- ant. The contents of the capillary tube were plated on TBr plates to determine accumulation of colony forming units.

Tethering Analysis-The method used to tether the bacteria has been described (Berg and Tedesco, 1975; Berg and Block, 1984). Cells were diluted 1:lOO from an overnight TBr culture into minimal medium and grown for 4.5 h. Each tethered bacterium was subjected to the addition and removal of chemoeffectors over a period of 8 min. The behavior analyzed as previously described (Kirsch et al., 1993).

In Vitro Methylesteruse Assay-The methylesterase activity of cellu- lar extracts was determined by the method of Stock and Koshland (1978) with some modifications. Stationary phase cells were diluted 1:lOO into 6 liters of LBr and were harvested afker 10 h of growth at 37 "C. Cell pellets were washed twice in 1 M KCI, then twice in MT buffer (10 m~ potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 1 rm MgCl,, 0.1 rm EDTA, 1 rm 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 m~ phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.02% sodium azide) and resuspended in a final volume of 30 ml of MT buffer. Cells were incubated with 3 mg/ml lysozyme for 1 h at room temperature and lysed by sonication. Cell debris was removed by cen- trifugation at 12,000 x g for 30 min. Extracts were then assayed for methylesterase activity. Protein concentration was determined using the Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce Chemical Co.). Radioac- tive-methylated membranes from a cheR mutant (012680) were pre- pared to be used as the substrate for the methylesterase assay. These membrane preparations were labeled with [methyl-3HlS-adenosyIme- thionine using soluble extracts of 012714 which overexpresses CheRB in an E. coli strain lacking all other chemotaxis proteins. Labeled mem- branes were washed twice in 1 M KC1 and once in MT buffer and resuspended in MT buffer at a concentration of 40 mg/ml membrane protein.

The methylesterase assay was performed by adding cellular extracts to the labeled membranes. Reactions contained labeled membranes di- luted to a final protein concentration of 0.4 mg/ml, 20% glycerol, and 37.7 mg/ml whole cell extract protein. The reaction was incubated at 28 "C and 100-pl aliquots were taken at different time intervals up to 90 min and added to 900 pl of cold ethanol. The resultant precipitate was

25352

1

59

122

185

248

296

344

392

440

488

536

584

632

680

728

776

824

872

920

968

1016

1078

1141

B, subtilis Chemotactic Methyltransferase

C&GACCTCTGCCTTTCCCAACGATCTMAATCAGCTGAMAGCTGATTTTTTTAlTQ~CAA 184 (-35)

"""" , <""""

TACAATTTCCTGATAMACMGCTATACTAGGACAAAAAGACAGCGAGACTWAO&QTAGAG 241 (-10) chon

ATG GAT ACA TAC AGC GTA TTT ACA ACG AAA TGG AAA CAA TTA ACC GGA 295 M D T Y S V F T T K W K Q L T G

GTC GAT TTA ACA CTA TAT AAA GAA GCA CAA ATG RAG AGA AGG CTA ACG 343 V D L T L Y K E A Q N K R R L T

TCA CTT TAT GAG AAA AAG GGG TTC CAA AGC TTT AAG GAC TTT GCT GQi 391 S L Y E K K G F Q S F K D F A A

GCA TTG GAA AAG GAT CAA GCT CTC TTA AAT GAA ACA TTG GAC AGA A S 439 A L E K D Q A L L N E T L D R W

AM: ATC AAT GTT TCA GAA TTT TAT CGT AAT TAT AAA AGA TGG GAA GTT 481 T I N V S E F Y R N Y K R W E V

CTT GAG ACT GCA ATT CTG CCG TTA ATC AAG ACC TCT AGG CCT Au 535 PrnI

L E T A I L P L I K T S R P L K

ATT TGG AGT GCC GCC TGC TCA ACG GGG GAG GAG CCA TAC ACG CTT GCC 583 I W S A A C S T G E E P Y T L A

ATG CTT TTG GAC CAG CAA AAA GGT CTT CCG GGC TAT CAG ATT TTA GQ: 631 H L L D Q Q K G L P G Y Q I L A

ACG GAT ATT GAT GAA AAA GCA TTG GAA AAA GCG AAA MA GGC GTT TAT 679 T D I D E K A L E K A K K G V Y

CAG GAG CGO TCT TTA CAG GAA GTG CCX GTA TGT GTG AAA GAT CGT TAT 721 Q E R S L Q E V P L S V K D R Y

TTT ACG CM AAC GCA AAT AGA AGT TAT GAA GTG AAA A S GAA ATC AM 775 F T Q N A N R S Y E V K T E I K

AAG AAT ATT ACA TTC AAA AAG CAC AAT TTG Cl'G GCG GAT CGT TAT GAA 823 K N I T F K K H N L L A D R Y E

CAA GAC TTT GAC TTA ATC GTG TGC CGC AAT GTA TTT ATT TAT TTT ACA 871 Q D F D L I V C R N V F I Y F T

GAA AGC GCG AAG GAA GAG CTG TAT TTA AAA ATG GCA CAT AGC TTC AAG 919 E S A K E E L Y L K M A H S L K

AAG AAT GGA GTT CTT TTT GTC GGC AGC ACC GAG CAA ATC TTC RAT CCC 961 K N G V L F V G S T E Q I F N P

GAG MA TTT GGC CTA GTC CCA GCC GAT ACA TTC TTT TAT CAA M A AGA 1015 E K F G L V P A D T F P Y Q K R

TAG A ~ C T G A A h M T A T G ~ ~ T ~ T A C T T ~ G C G ~ A A T G ~ A T G 1077 (-35) (-10)

..e

AA~AGAAGAAGTCATGAGATA?TTAACAGCCGGAGAATCACACGGCCCCCAACTGACAACC 1140 .rnF

ATTATTGAOGOTGTACCTGCCGGGCTTTACATAACGOAGGAAO~A~ m R "

1188

1018, encoding a 256 amino acid polypeptide. Relevant restriction sites are in boldface and labeled. Putative promoter sequences and ribosome FIG. 1. Nucleotide sequence of CheRB. The open reading frame corresponding to CheRB begins at position 248 and terminates at position

Asterisks (*) designate the stop codon of cheRB. binding sites are underlined and in boldface. Inverted repeat regions suggesting potential pindependent terminators are denoted with arrows.

B. subtilis Chemotactic Methyltransferase 25353

CheR, CheRE M T S S L P C G Q T S L L L Q M T E R L A L S D A H F R R FrzF M L T A S Q K V L Q Q

M D T Y S V 6

* CheR, F T T K W K Q L T G V D L T L Y K E A Q M K R R L T S L Y 35 CheR, I S Q L I Y Q R A G I V L A D H K R D M V Y N R L V R R L FrzF L A A L L L E R A G L K I T P D G F H S L R L A L S A R M

. * *

CheR, E K K G F Q S F K D F A A A L E K D Q A L L N E T L D R M 64 CheR, R S L G L T D F G H Y L N L L E S N Q H S G E W Q A F I N FrzF P V L G L E E P E H Y I Q R L T G A G G E E E L R S L L P

* .

CheR,

FrzF CheRE

CheR, CheR, FrzF

CheR, CheR, FrzF

T I N V S E F Y R N Y K R W E V L E T A I - - L P L - - - aa S L T T N L T A F F R E A H H F P L L A - - - L V T V G H T E F F R D A K Q F R A L E K S V L P D L V S

D H A - - -

* * * . . * * * * * * * * ” I K T S R P L K I W S A A C S T G E E P Y T L A M L L 115

R S R R E M R K V S I W S A G C A T G E E P Y S L A M V L - - R R G S G E Y R V W S A A A S T G E E P Y S I A M T L

. . * . . . * . * D Q Q K G L - P G - Y Q I L A T D I D E K A L E K A K K G 142 A D T L G T A P G R W K V F A S D I D T E V L E K A R S G A E - L G A L S L E V D L W A T D L N L A A V E A A K Q G

CheRB V Y Q E R S L Q E V P L S V K D R Y F T Q - - N A N R S Y 169 CheRE I Y R H E E L K N L T P Q Q L Q R Y F M R G T G P H E G L

* . *

FrzF R F T S R R A I S I N Q A R L T R F F K P V E E G Y E A L

* * * * . . CheR, - E V K T E I K K N I T F K K H N L L A D R Y E - - - - Q 193 CheR, V R V R Q E L A N Y V D F A P L N L L A K Q Y T V P - - G FrzF P A L R - E - - - Y I R F D G Q N L A V P V F D K V A L S . * * * * * * * * * CheR, D F D L I V C R N V F I Y F T E S A K E E L Y L K M A H S 222

FrzF S L D L I L C R N V I I Y F D L P T I R G L M D R F L A A CheG P F D A I F C R N V M I Y F D Q T T Q Q E I L R R F V P L

* . * * * * * * * CheR, L K K N G V L F V G - S T E Q I F N - P E K - F G - - - L 245 CheRE L K P D G L L F A G H S - E N - F S H L E R R F T - - - FrzF L R P G G L L F L G Y S - E S L F K V Y D R F F E M I E V

L

CheR, V P A D T F F Y Q K R CheRE R G Q T V Y A L S K D FrzF D G A F V Y R R P L

256

FIG. 2. Amino acid alignment of B. subtilis CheRB, E. coli CheR,, and M. xanthus FnF. Alignment of CheR, with each protein was performed using the AALIGN program from DNASTAR. The two alignments were then combined manually to optimize the apparent homology among the three proteins. Amino acids that appear in all three proteins are designated with an asterisk (*). A dot ( 0 ) represents a match between CheR, and CheRE only. Other single matches with FrzF exist but are not shown.

removed by centrifugation in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge for 2 min, - and the supernatant was assayed for radioactivity. 250 bp

RESULTS BntY I D n l D n l EcoRV Tj Nucleotide Sequence-A 1.2-kilobase BstYIfEcoRV restric- I I I I

tion fragment of B. subtilis DNA was sequenced on both strands in its entirety and was found to contain an open read- El -n ing frame encoding a 256-amino acid protein with a predicted molecular mass of 29,954 daltons (Fig. 1). The predicted amino acid sequence of this open reading frame was compared to proteins in GenBank and was found to have the highest per- centage identity with the chemotactic methyltransferase CheRE (Mutoh and Simon, 1986). It was found to have 29% amino acid identity (Fig. 2). Based on the homology this open reading frame was named cheRB. CheRB is also homologous to FrzF, a methyltransferase of Myrococcus zanthus (McCleary et al., 1990), with 27% identity.

A putative &-promoter (Helmann and Chamberlin, 1987) was found just upstream of this open reading frame (Fig. 1). While there was no apparent rho-independent terminator for cheRs, the downstream gene, aroF, is preceded by a putative &-promoter. This suggests that cheRs is monocistronic and transcription of cheRB may terminate in a pdependent manner.

That this open reading frame was cheRe was confirmed by a complementation experiment. Strain 011100, which lacks

ndk cheR aroF che - pAZ294 + - pAZZ86 -

Phenotype - pAZ291 +

FIG. 3. Restriction Map of cheRB. cheRB as well as the flanking portions of the adjacent genes are shown aa bores. Relevant restriction sites used in the construction of integration plasmids are indicated. The arrow represents the promoter area and direction of transcription of cheRB. The boxes at the bottom indicate the extent of DNA present on integration plasmids as described in text. The Che phenotype of E. subtilis transformants is shown.

methyltransferase activity (Burgess-Cassler and Ordal, 1982), was complemented by the plasmid pAZ285, which expresses cheRB (Table I). The complemented strain formed a wild type swarm on a TBr swarm plate (data not shown).

25354 B. subtilis Chemotactic Methyltransferase TABLE I1

Capillary assay of chemotaxis by integration strains

Strain Attractant No. of bacteria in capillary

011085 012680 012681 012682 0 1 1085 012680 012681 012682

1 mM Azetidine-2-COOH 2639 = 729 110 t 17

2336 = 43 4362 = 675

None 25 f 4

18 f 3 3 2 1

27 = 5

1 2 3 4

FIG. 4. In uioo methylations of MCPs i n cheRR integration strains. Labeling was performed for 5 min with 10 pCi of [methyl- 3Hlmethionine per sample. Lane I , 011085 (wild type, B. subtilis); lane 2, 012680; lane 3, 012681; and lane 4, 012682.

Directed Mutagenesis and Analysis of cheR-As stated above, sequence analysis suggests that cheRR is monocistronic. This hypothesis is consistent with the location of cheRs be- tween two genes whose products carry out functions entirely unrelated to chemotaxis (ndk and aroF). Furthermore, integra- tion plasmids formed using DNA spanning the promoter proxi- mal end of the gene, DNA from the middle, and DNA spanning the promoter distal end of the gene (Fig. 3) were subcloned into plasmids which cannot replicate in Bsubtilis. These plasmids were subsequently introduced into wild type B. subtilis to form 012682,012680, and 012681, respectively. In this type of anal- ysis, one expects that if a promoter or terminator is contained in the DNA which is cloned in the integration vector, upon recombination, an uninterrupted operon will remain. However, if only internal DNA included, the operon will be disrupted (Piggot et al., 1984). As expected, only 012680, which was cre- ated using pAZ286 (Table I), showed a deficiency in CheR ac- tivity (see below) and no metabolic requirement for aromatic amino acids was created.

Analysis of cheRB Mutants-The integration strains 012680, 012681, and 012682 were tested for chemotaxis by the capil- lary assay and only 012680, having the integration plasmid with only the middle of the gene, was defective. Chemotaxis to the non-metabolizable proline analog, azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, was only 4% that of wild type (Table 11). This is similar to the taxis shown by the cheRR strain 011100, toward isoleucine (Ullah and Ordal, 1981). A null mutant containing a cat gene replacement of cheRR, showed the same taxis as 012680 (data not shown).

To confirm that strain 012680 was defective in methyltrans- ferase activity, in uivo methylation experiments were carried out. Here, radiolabeled methionine is taken up by the cells, converted into S-adenosylmethionine, and used to methyles- terify the MCPs in a reaction catalyzed by the CheR methyl- transferase (Burgess-Cassler et al., 1982). As expected, only 012680 was defective in methylation. The wild type strain (011085) as well as strains 012681 and 012682 were normal for methylation (Fig. 4).

Complementation of E. coli cheR Mutant-Zn vitro experi- ments have indicated that B. subtilis CheR can substitute for E. coli CheR in methylation of E. coli MCPs (Burgess-Cassler and Ordal, 1982). Expression of cheRR from pAZ283 in an E. coli cheR null mutant, complemented the mutant as seen on a TBr swarm plate (Fig. 5). CheRB also methylated the MCPs in vivo (Fig. 6).

1

3 FIG. 5. Effect of expression of cheRB in cheR, null mutan t

coli) ( 1 ), RP1254(cheRE null) (2), 012697 (wild type containing pAZ283, RP1254 on TBr swarm plates. Single colonies of RP437 (wild type E.

expressing CheRB) ( 3 ) , and 012698 (cheRE null, containing pAZ283, expressing CheRB) (4 ) , were stabbed onto TBr swarm plates and incu- bated a t 30 "C for 9 h.

1 2 3

FIG. 6. Effect of expression of cheR, in cheRE null mutan t RP1254 on in uiuo methylation. Labeling was performed for 5 min with 10 pCi of [methyl-3Hlmethionine per sample. Lane 1, RP437 (wild type, E. coli); lane 2, RP1254 (cheRE null); and lane 3, 012698 (cheRE null, containing pAZ283, expressing CheRB).

."" 1

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Time (min)

FIG. 7. Effect of attractant on behavior of tethered cells. 10 p~ azetidine-2-carboxylic acid was added at 1 min and removed a t 4 min. Two subpopulations of cells from the same culture were seen and each one was analyzed separately. 011085 (wild type, B. subtilis) is repre- sented by the heavy line and the two subpopulations of the 012680 strain are represented by thin lines.

Behavioral Analysis Using Tethered Cells-Tethering analy- sis of wild type cells gives a very reproducible behavioral profile upon repetition under identical conditions. Upon tethering cheRB null mutant cells (0126801, quite variable profiles were obtained when randomly selected bacteria were analyzed. When the bacteria were categorized and analyzed as two sepa- rate behavioral subpopulations, all the bacteria unambigu- ously fell into one of the two categories. One subpopulation had a prestimulus flagellar rotation bias that was extremely CW, and the other had a more random bias (Fig. 7). To rule out the possibility of contamination, the cell cultures that were ana- lyzed were derived from a single colony which itself was derived from several cycles of colony purification. Each colony always led to the development of the two subpopulations. The distri- bution of these cells in each subpopulation was determined by

B. subtilis Chemotactic Methyltransferase 25355

counting a large number of tethered cells (100-300) and cat- egorizing them into one of the two subpopulations based on the observed prestimulus behavior. It was found that 33% of the cheRB population showed the extreme CCW bias while 66% showed the more random behavior. The time dependent behav- ioral profile of the two subpopulations appear to be superim- posable, after normalizing for the initial bias (Fig. 71, indicating that the response to the addition and removal of attractant is independent of the prestimulus bias. Tethering analysis of other cheRB mutants (strains 011100 and 012652) also showed two subpopulations in approximately the same proportions as 012680 (data not shown).

AcheRB/cheBB double null mutant (013017) was analyzed by the tethering assay. Its behavioral profile was strikingly simi- lar to that of the more random cheRB mutant subpopulation (data not shown). This suggested that the more random behav- ior of this subpopulation could be the result of a deficiency in CheBB activity. To test this hypothesis, wild type cheBB, on an expression plasmid (pMK108), was introduced into the cheRB mutant (012680) generating strain 013041. The distribution of the two subpopulations changed from 33% with an extreme CW bias to 66% of the population with this bias.

The behavior of strain 012680 was analyzed when subjected to the addition and removal of the repellent indole at a concen- tration of 0.82 m~ (Fig. 8). Only the more random subpopula- tion was analyzed since the more tumbly subpopulation had a prestimulus bias too low for a repellent response to be detected. The cells showed a rapid decrease in the CCW bias upon the addition of repellent but showed no adaptation. Upon removal of the repellent the CCW bias returned to the prestimulus level in the cheR mutant whereas the wild type showed a large increase in CCW bias, above the prestimulus level, upon re- moval of repellent (Fig. 8).

In Vitro Methylesteruse Activity in Whole Cell Extracts-The results of the behavioral assays of the cheR mutant suggested that there may be a deficiency in the methylesterase activity due to the absence of the methyltransferase. To test this hy- pothesis, in vitro methylesterase assays were performed on whole cell extracts from wild type (011085), cheB mutant (0128361, and cheR mutant (012680). It was demonstrated that the radiolabel introduced into the 012680 membranes could be entirely released by incubation for 1 h in 0.1 M NaOH at 28 "C. The reaction containing the extract from the strain lacking any CheB (012836) (Kirsch et al., 1993) showed some release of methanol which may be attributed to spontaneous hydrolysis and nonspecific enzymatic release of methanol. After subtract-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tlme (min)

We. 8. Effect of repellent on behavior of tethered cells. 0.82 rn indole was added at 1 min and removed at 4 min. Only the more random of the two subpopulations of cheR mutant cells was analyzed. 011085 is represented by the heavy line and 012680 is represented by a thin line.

ing this non-specific methanol production from the rate of pro- duction determined for the wild type and cheR mutant it was found that the wild type cells showed a CheB-specific activity of 0.28% of total methyl group released per mdml of protein in whole cell extract&. The cheR mutant showed a CheB specific activity of 0.06%. Therefore the CheB activity in the extract from the CheR mutant is only 20% that of the wild type.

DISCUSSION

In this study we report the identification of a gene encoding the chemotactic methyltransferase in B. subtilis and show that it is homologous to the E. coli chemotactic methyltransferase (CheR) and to FrzF from M. ranthus. The DNA sequence sug- gests that cheRB is monocistronic and under the control of the vegetative sigma factor, OA. In addition, it has been shown that while the MCPs are under the control of 8, che& is not (Mar- quez et al., 1990). This is further strengthened by studies with la&-fusions with cheRB demonstrating that cheR is expressed vegetatively and not under the control of alternate sigma fac- tors.2 Most of the other flagella and chemotaxis genes are lo- cated in a large operon which is also under the control of o"' (Zuberi et al., 1990; Bischoff and Ordal, 1992). This is in con- trast to the chemotaxis and flagellar genes of E. coli, which are regulated by an alternate sigma factor (Helmann and Cham- berlin, 1987; Arnosti and Chamberlin, 1988)

The main areas of amino acid similarity are near the middle and near the C-terminal end. CheRB can replace CheRE in allowing chemotaxis on a TBr swarm plate (Fig. 5). The simi- larity was somewhat imperfect as methylation of the E. coli MCPs by CheRB only approximated that in wild type E. coli.

Several features of chemotaxis in B. subtilis appear to be opposite to those of E. coli. Null mutants in cheYB and cheAB are tumbly (Bischoff and Ordal, 1991; Fuhrer and Ordal, 19911, whereas those in cheYB and che& are smooth swimming (Oosawa et al., 1988; Parkinson, 1978). It is likely that CheY-P causes smooth swimming in B. subtilis, whereas CheY-P causes tumbling in E. In the same vein, a null mutant in cheRE is smooth swimming (Chen, 19921, whereas a null mutant in cheRB shows a more tumbly bias. It is believed that unmeth- ylated MCPs in E. coli generate smaller CW signals because the "default" condition in E. coli (when there is no CheY-P) is CCW. By the same line of argument, we infer that unmethyl- ated MCPs of B. subtilis generate weak CCW signals because in B. subtilis the "default" condition is CW rotation (Bischoff and Ordal, 1991).

Adaptation in E. coli is generally thought to be due to changes in the methylation level of MCPs in E. coli (Goy et al., 1977) and the same may be true in B. subtilis. CheB, which catalyzes removal of methyl groups, helps bring about adapta- tion to positive stimuli in B. subtilis (Kirsch et al., 1993) and to negative stimuli in E. coli (Hiroyuki et al., 1983). Methylation of the MCPs, by CheR,, should then be responsible for the adaptation to negative stimuli in B. subtilis. To test this, the cheR mutant 012680 was subjected to the addition and removal of the repellent indole. It showed no adaptation to the negative stimulus and returned to its prestimulus level only upon the removal the repellent (Fig. 8). Furthermore, in contrast to the wild type (011085), the cheR mutant showed no significant increase above the prestimulus CCW bias upon the removal of repellent. The wild type response to the positive stimulus of removal of repellent must therefore result from highly methyl- ated MCPs. This is the opposite of the E. coli system where the

G. W. Ordal, unpublished results.

Biochemistry 32,9256-9261.

* M. L. Kirsch, A. R. Zuberi, D. Henner, P. D. Peters, M. A. Yazdi, and

D. S. Bischoff, R. B. Bourret, M. L. Kirsch, and G. W. Ordal (1993)

25356 B. subtilis Chemotactic Methyltransferase increase in the CCW bias that is seen upon the removal of repellent results from poorly methylated MCPs.

Since, in the cheRs null mutant, there is no methylation of the MCPs (Fig. 4), there is no opportunity for CheB to remove methyl groups. However, partial adaptation still occurs in re- sponse to the addition of attractant stimuli (Fig. 7) as well as in the cheBB null mutant (Kirsch et al., 1993). Thus, the partial adaptation that does occur must be due to another mechanism which is independent of methylation (Kirsch et al., 1993). This partial adaptation, however, seems only to be involved in the adaptation to attractant stimuli as seen by the behavior of 012680 (Figs. 7 and 8).

A unique phenomenon has been observed, in that two differ- ent behaviors are demonstrated by the cheRB mutant. The fundamental difference between the two is that the prestimu- lus flagellar rotation bias is extremely CW in one of the sub- populations and more random in the other (Fig. 7). The behav- ior of the more random subpopulation is almost identical to that of a cheBBlcheRB double mutant (013017) (data not shown). This suggests that there may be a deficiency in CheBB activity in the cheRB mutants. Introduction of an expression plasmid containing wild-type cheBB shifts the distribution of the subpopulations towards a larger proportion with the ex- tremely CW rotating flagella. This implies that CheB activity may be diminished in the cheRB null mutant, and the intro- duction of pMK108 somewhat compensates for this deficiency. To further test this hypothesis, methylesterase assays were performed on whole cell extracts. The cheR mutant showed an 80% reduction in CheB activity as compared to the wild type. I t was found that cheR mutants of E. coli and Salmonella typhi- murium were also deficient in methylesterase activity, showing a 45% decrease and a 55% decrease, respectively (Stock and Koshland, 1978). Perhaps CheBB and CheRB form a complex that stabilizes CheBB from degradation. Experiments are now being done to further study possible interactions between CheBB and CheRB.

It appears that in B. subtilis, the higher the level of methyl- ation of the MCPs, the higher the prestimulus CCW flagellar rotation bias.2 This is the opposite of the E. coli system (Bork- ovich et al., 1992). I t is therefore likely that the true behavior of a strain lacking only CheR activity would be represented by the more tumbly subpopulation. The behavior in the more random subpopulation may result from a deficiency in CheB activity which would limit or prevent the deamidation of glutamine residues that is believed to be performed by CheBB as in E. coli (Sherris and Parkinson, 1981; Kehry et al., 1983; Terwilliger and Koshland, 1984). Since the glutamine residues function similarly to methylated glutamates (Dunten and Koshland, 1991), the signal sent by unstimulated MCPs would promote

higher CheAB activity than the unmethylated, deamidated MCPs of the more tumbly cheRB mutant subpopulation.

cloned DNA containing cheRB. We thank Dr. J. S. Parkinson for several Acknowledgments-We are grateful to Ann Moir for providing the

E. coli strains. We greatly appreciate the helpful discussions with D r . R. B. Bourret.

REFERENCES

Amosti, D. N., and Chamberlin, M. J. (1988) Proc. Null. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86,

Berg, H. C., and Block, S. M. (1984) J. Gen. Microbiol. 130, 2915-2920 Berg, H. C., and Tedesw, P. M. (1975) Pmc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72,3235-3239 Bischoff, D. S., and Ordal, G. W. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12301-12305 Bischoff, D. S., and Ordal, G . W. (1992) Mol. Microbiol. 6, 2715-2723 Borkovich, K. A., Alex, L. A,, and Simon, M. I. (1992) Pmc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S . A

Bourret, R. B.,Borkovich, K A,, and Simon, M. I.(1991) Annu. Reu. Biochem. So,

Burgess-Cassler, A.. and Ordal, G. W. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 12835-12838 Burgess-Cassler, A,, Ullah, A. H. J., and Ordal, G. W. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257,

Chen, J. (1992) Genetic Studies of Zhznsmembrane and Intracellular Signnlling by

Corarmblas, L., and Bolivar, F. (1982) Gene (Amst.) 17, 79-89 Dunten, P., and Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,1491-1496 Ferrari, F. A,, Nguyen, A,, Lang, D., and Hoch J. A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 164,

Fuhrer, D. K, and Ordal, G. W. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 7443-7448 Goy, M. F., Springer, M. S., and Adler, J. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74,

Helmann, J. D., and Chamberiin, M. J. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84,

Hess, J. F., Oosawa, K, Kaplan, N., and Simon, M. I. (1988b) Cell 63, 79-87 Hiroyuki, Y., Hayashi, H., and Parkinson, J. S. (1983)J. Bacterid. 166,1228-1235 Kirsch, M. L., Peters, P. D., Hanlon, D. W., Kirby, J. R., and Ordal, G. W. (1993) J.

Keluy, M. R., Bond, M. W., Hunkapiller, M. W., and Dahlquist, F. W. (1983) Pmc.

Leonhardt, H., and Alonso J. C. (1988) J. Gen. Microbiol. 134,605-609 Marquez, L. M., Helmann, J. D., Ferrari, E., Parker, H. M., Ordal, G. W., and

McCleary, W. R., McBride, M. J., and Zusman, D. R. (1990) J . Bacteriol. 172,

Mutoh, N., and Simon, M. I. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 165, 161-166 Oosawa, IC, Hess, J. F., and Simon, M. I. (1988) Cell 53, 89-96 Ordal, G. W., and Goldman, D. J.(1975) Science 189,802-805 Ordal, G. W., Nettleton, D. A., and Hoch, J. A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 164,1088-1097 Parkinson, J. S . (1978) J. Bacteriol. 13645-53 Piggot, P. J., Curtis, C. A. M., and De Lencastre, H. (1984) J. Gen. Microbiol. BO,

Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) h. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74,

Shems, D., and Parkinson J. S. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 6051-

Simms, S. A., Stock, A. M., and Stock, J. B. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262,85374543 Stock, J. A,, and Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76,

Tabor, S., and Richardson, C. C. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S . A. 82, 1074-

Terwilliger, T. C., and Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 7719-7725 Ullah, A. H. J., and Ordal G. W. (1981) J. Bacteriol. 145,958-965 Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J. and Messing, J. (1985) Gene 33, 103 Yazdi, M. A. and Moir, A. (1990) J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 1335-1342 Zuberi, A. R., Ying, C., Weinreich, M. R., and Ordal, G. W. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172,

830-834

89,675-760

401-441

84124417

a Bacterial Chemoreceptor. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utah

1513-1515

4964-4968

64224424

Biol. Chem. 266, 1861C18616

Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80,3599-3604

Chamberlin, M. J. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 3435-3443

4877-4887

2123-2136

5463-5467

6055

36593663

1078

1870-1876