The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the Treatment 2.0 framework

17
Proposals for a Global Innovation System that Responds to Patients Needs and Ensures both Innovation and Access IAC –22 July 2012 The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the Treatment 2.0 framework Mariângela Simão Rights, Gender and Community Mobilization Department UNAIDS

description

Proposals for a Global Innovation System that Responds to Patients Needs and Ensures both Innovation and Access IAC –22 July 2012. The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the Treatment 2.0 framework . Mariângela Simão Rights, Gender and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the Treatment 2.0 framework

Page 1: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Proposals for a Global Innovation System that Responds to Patients Needs and Ensures both Innovation and AccessIAC –22 July 2012

The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the Treatment 2.0 framework

Mariângela SimãoRights, Gender and

Community Mobilization DepartmentUNAIDS

Page 2: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Global summary of the AIDS epidemic 2011

34.2 million [31.8 - 35.9 million] 30.7 million [28.6–32.2 million]16.7 million [15.7–17.8 million]3.4 million [3.1–3.9 million]

2.5 million [2.2 –2.8 million]2.2 million [2.0 - 2.4 million] 330 000 [280 000–380 000]

1.7 million [1.6 –1.9 million]1.5 million [1.3 –1.7 million] 230 000 [200 000–270 000]

Number of people living with HIV

People newly infected with HIV in 2011 AIDS deaths in 2011

TotalAdults

WomenChildren (<15 years)

TotalAdults

Children (<15 years)

TotalAdults

Children (<15 years)

Page 3: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

People receiving antiretroviral therapy versus the 2015 target and the number of AIDS-related deaths, low- and middle-

income countries, 2003–2011

AIDS-related deaths

Estimated range of AIDS-related deaths

People receiving antiretroviral therapy

2015 Target

Page 4: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Eligibility for antiretroviral therapy versus coverage, low- and middle-income countries, by

region, 2011

The area of the larger circle represents the number of people eligible for antiretroviral therapy. The shaded circle and percentage represent coverage in 2011.

Page 5: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Prices of first-line and second-line ARV regimens for adults in low-income countries, 2008–2011

Source: Global Price Reporting Mechanism, World Health Organization, 2012.

FIRST-LINE REGIMENS

SECOND-LINE REGIMENS

Page 6: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

The future is happening right now

Migration from 1st to 2nd LineRegion Annual Rate of Migration

Africa 2.6%

Latin America 2.6%

South-East Asia 1.1%

Western Pacific 1.1%

Other Regions 1.9%

Countries using routine viral load monitoring

6.0%

Source: Systematic review by WHO and Australian National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research (CROI 2010)

Long term treatment programs – 25-30% patients on 2nd line

Page 7: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Can treatment be more accessible, affordable, simple and efficient?

The right drugs available at the right place and time….

Page 8: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Treatment 2.0 – a programmatic approach

TREATMENT2.0

Adapt delivery systems

Mobilize communities

POC and other

simplified monitoring

Optimize drug

regimens

Reduce costs

Five pillars

Achieve and sustain universal access & maximize the preventive benefits of ART

Simplification

Page 9: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Reducing costs and increasing sustainability – collaboration?

• Role for the UN supporting countries on the use of TRIPS flexibilities, access principles – guidelines, policy papers, issues briefs

• Global mechanisms for IP related issues and access– Medicines Patent Pool – “ up and running” – licensing

mechanisms - FDC and optimized Tx options– Ohter initiatives

• UNITAID, CHAI• Local production and regulatory harmonization • Upcoming – consultation on pricing in upper middle

income countries

Page 10: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Successful country initiatives to cut the costs of ARV

Note: (i) At an exchange rate of 7.40 ZAR/USD, the savings amounted to R 4.7 billion.Sources: (ii) Massive reduction in ARV prices. Johannesburg, Government of South Africa, 2010 (www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=15423&tid=26211, accessed 15 June 2012);(iii) Mutabaazi I.I. Scaling up antiretroviral treatment using the same dollar: cost efficiency and effectiveness of TASO Uganda Pharmacy Management System of CDC-PEPFAR funded program. XIXInternational AIDS Conference, Washington, DC, 22–27 July 2012. Note: the content of poster discussion abstracts and poster exhibition abstracts for the XIX International AIDS Conference isembargoed until 15:00 (U.S. Eastern Standard Time) on Sunday, 22 July 2012; (iv) Viegas Neves da Silva F, Hallal R, Guimaraes A. Compulsory licence and access to medicines: economic savings of efavirenz in Brazil. XIX International AIDS Conference, Washington, DC, 22–27 July 2012. Note: the content of poster discussion abstracts and poster exhibition abstracts for the XIX International AIDS Conference is embargoed until 15:00 (U.S. Eastern Standard Time) on Sunday, 22 July2012.

Page 11: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Optimization Strategy

Rationale What is critically needed

Major challenges & risks

Fixed-Dose Combinations

Combining existing compatible ARV drugs in one pill or co-blister improve adherence and simplify treatment

Bioequivalence studies Register results

Lab-development and testingRegulatory issuesMarket fragmentation

ARV Dose Reduction

A lower dose of a given ARV drug may have the same effect on treating the disease, at lower cost /lower side effects

Clinical trials (efficacy)Publish/register resultsDosing guidelines

Clinical trials very expensiveRegulatory issuesEthical concernsPerception concernsMarket confusion

Reformulation (eg; extended release formulations)

New formulation of an existing ARV drug can give equal level of drug in the body/blood, while taking lower dose

Bioequivalence studies Register resultsDosing guidelines

Lab-development and testingClinical trials less expensivePerception concernsMarket confusion

New Drugs & Combinations

New drug with a different profile will replace a previous component in the drug regimen, with improvement of efficacy, tolerability or convenience

Clinical trials (safety and efficacy)

Clinical trials very expensiveMarket fragmentation

New ART Strategies (eg: Induction-maintenance)

Phased approach with a short/periodic induction using combined ARV drug regimen followed by a long term monotherapy for maintenance after stable viral suppression , with improvement of tolerability, convenience, cost and long term adherence

Clinical trials (efficacy) Clinical trials very expensiveEthical concernsPerception concernsMarket confusion

ART Optimization

Page 12: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Addressing innovation and access to innnovation

o Improving effectiveness, tolerability and resilience of 1st line regimens

o Assessing regimen switch needs: PoC VLo New drugs in the pipeline: accelerating entry into

market of innovative productso Ensuring competition for innovative products:

licensing mechanisms and technology transfero Global R&D convention?

Page 13: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Pipeline for adults’ ARVs (UNITAID)

Apricitabine

IDX-12899

Ibalizumab

Festinavir

BMS-663068

Long-acting Rilpivirine

Lersivirine

Long-acting Dolutegravir

Long-acting CMX-157

GS-7340

SPI-452

CMX-157

Therapeutic type: Attachment InhibitorIntegrase InhibitorPK boosterNNRTINRTI PI

Pre-clinical Phase I Phase IIIDiscovery Phase II

Registration Market

Long-actingElvucitibine

QuadEVG/COB/TDF/FTC

c. 2012

DRV/COB

DRV/COB/FTC/GS-7340

ATV/COB

c. 2012

CobicistatJul 2011

Dolutegravirc. 2014

Elvitegravirc. 2012

Zidovudine Dose Reduction

300 mg 200 mg bid

Efavirenz Dose Reduction

600 mg 400 mg bid

ATV/rDose Reduction

300/100 mg 200/100 mg bid

Source: Source: Adapted from 2011 i-Base/TAG Pipeline Report (available at http://i-base.info/home/2011-pipeline-report-2nd edition-september-2011) and clinicaltrials.gov.

Page 14: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Etravirine

Rilpivirine

Atazanavir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

Darunavir

Tenofovir

Maraviroc

Pre-clinical Phase I Phase IIIDiscovery Phase II

Registration Market

Therapeutic type: Entry InhibitorIntegrase InhibitorPK boosterNNRTINRTI PI

EVG/COB

Source: Source: Adapted from 2011 i-Base/TAG Pipeline Report (available at http://i-base.info/home/2011-pipeline-report-2nd edition-september-2011) and clinicaltrials.gov.

Pipeline for paediatric ARVs (UNITAID)

Page 15: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

What is needed to meet the challenge of scale up?

o Radical simplification (Tx algorithm, drugs, services)

o Innovation (in drug design, diagnostics, delivery) – shorten time between development and entry into market – registration…

o Efficiency gains – service delivery

o Effectiveness and impact – coverage and early diagnosis

o Equity and affordability (at individual and system level)

o Leadership, willingness and resources to invest

Page 16: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

What do we stand for?

o “No one being left behind”o Different approaches to coverage – upper middle

income countries; key populations, etc

o No double standardso Simpler to use, less toxic, heat stable drugs are

good for patients no matter where they live

o People live long and better liveso Early diagnosis. Earlier treatment initiation(?)o Better drugs and monitoring kitso…………..

Page 17: The innovation & access gaps and challenges for HIV/AIDS under the  Treatment 2.0 framework

Bridging the gap?