The Inland Extent of Lake Effect Snow (LES) Bands
description
Transcript of The Inland Extent of Lake Effect Snow (LES) Bands
The Inland Extent of Lake Effect Snow (LES) Bands
Joseph P. VillaniNOAA/NWS Albany, NY
Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr.NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY
Jason KrekelerNOAA/NWS State College, PA/State University of
NY at Albany
Outline
• Goals• Methodology• Results• A few case
studies/examples• Summary
Goals• Identify atmospheric parameters
which commonly have the greatest influence on a LES band’s inland extent
• Infuse research findings into operations
• Improve forecasts to support NWS Watch/Warning/Advisory program
Satellite depiction of developing LES band
Well developed band from Lake Ontario to the Hudson Valley
Upstream moisture sources
Methodology/Data Sources• Examined around 25 LES events
across the Eastern Great Lakes (Erie/Ontario) during the 2006-2009 time frame
– For each event, parameters evaluated at 6-hour intervals (00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC), using mainly 0-hr NAM12 model soundings
– Event duration varied from 6 hours to multiple days
Methodology/Data Sources• Wind regimes stratified by mean flows:–250-290° for single bands (WSW-ENE
oriented)–300-320° for multi bands (NW-SE oriented)
• LES bands’ inland extent (miles) calculated from radar mosaics, distance measuring tool
• Data points:– Locations inside and north/south band• Data stratified by location relative to band
Example of Data Points
Points in and near LES band
BUF soundingALY sounding
Parameters1) Mixed layer (ML) wind Avg. direction/speed (deg/kt)2) Ambient low level moisture
Surface dewpoint (°C); Max ML dewpoint depression (TdD) (°C)
3) Snow band width/length
>= 15 dBZ contour (mi)
4) Niziol instability class Lake–air T(°C) at 700/850 hPa 5) Capping inversion Inversion height: top of ML (m)6) Vertical wind sheara. bulk shear (0-1, 0-3 km)
Vector difference between wind at top and bottom of layer (kt)
6) Vertical wind shearb. directional/speed
Estimated values between surface and top of ML (deg/kt)
7) Low-level convergence
From 0-hour 12km NAM
8) Multi-lake connection?
Satellite/radar data
Strategy to Determine Best Parameters
• Used statistical correlations in Excel spreadsheet to determine most influential factors driving inland extent
– Overall, locations relative to bands made little difference in the correlations (within the bands vs. north or south)• A few exceptions
Statistical Correlations• Best correlators to inland extent (all
points together): ALY events
–850 hPa Lake-air ∆T (-0.63)–Multi-lake connection present
(0.59)–Capping inversion height (0.53)–0-1 km bulk shear (0.44)
Statistical Correlations• Also notable correlators in locations
outside of the bands: – Points south of the band:• Mixed-layer wind speed (0.33)• Mixed-layer directional shear (-0.18)
– Points north of the band:• Surface convergence (0.34)• 925 hPa convergence (0.12)
Results from Correlations• Environments that promote greater
inland extent:
–Multi-Lake Connection– Conditional instability class– Strong 0-1 km shear, weaker shear in1-3
km layer– High capping inversion height
Event Types from Results• Event types favorable for inland extent
based on strongest correlations– Instability and Multi-Lake Connection (MLC)
• Niziol Instability Class: – Conditional Instability• Lake-850 hPa difference: 12°C to18°C• Lake-700 hPa difference: 17°C to 24°C
–Moderate-Extreme Instability• Lake-850 hPa difference: >18°C• Lake-700 hPa difference: >24°C
• Use these parameters to classify events:
– Type A – MLC & Conditional Instability (most favorable type for inland extent)
– Type B – MLC & Moderate/Extreme Instability
– Type C – No MLC & Moderate/Extreme Instability
– Type D – No MLC & Conditional Instability
Classifying Event Types
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Inland Extent (mi)
Lake–850 TD (°C)
Lake-700 TD (°C)
Inversion Height (km x 10)
Type CType BType A
Results by Event Type
Vertical Wind Profiles of Mixed Layer
• Type A – greater 0-1 km shear, less above 1 km
• Other Types – less 0-1 km shear, greater above0-3
km
0-1 km
Z
X
Type A – Surface – 29Oct2006 18Z
Type A Sounding - 29Oct2006 18Z
• Strong 0-1 km speed shear, weaker 1-3 km
• Little directional shear in mixed layer
• High (if any) capping inversion
• Conditional Instability– Lake temp: 10°C– 850 temp : - 4°C– 700 temp: - 15°C
0°C
• Broad cyclonic flow associated with Low pressure in Quebec• Multi-Lake Connection indicated by visible satellite
Type A – Satellite – 29Oct2006 18Z
850 hPa wind
Upstream Bands
• LES band inland extent around 169 mi
Type A – Radar – 29Oct2006 18Z
0-1 km bulk shear
Type C – Surface – 07Feb2007 18Z
Type C Sounding – 07Feb2007 18Z• Less 0-1 km
speed shear, greater shear in 1-3 km layer
• More directional shear in mixed layer
• Extreme Instability– Lake temp:
4°C– 850 temp : -
18°C– 700 temp: -
28°C
0°C
• NO Multi-Lake Connection indicated by visible satellite• Well-developed single band, but with little inland extent
Type C – Satellite – 07Feb2007 18Z
850 hPa wind
No connection with upstream bands
• LES band inland extent only 34 mi
Type C – Radar – 07Feb2007 18Z
0-1 km bulk shear
• Type A events result in greatest inland extent, often over 100 miles
• Key factors are: Instability, MLC, Shear– Ideal conditions: • Conditional instability• MLC• Strong mixed layer flow with minimal speed
shear between 1-3 km • Nearly unidirectional flow through mixed
layer
Summary
• Refer to event types when forecasting inland extent– Forecast the event type, which will yield good first
guess for inland extent potential
• Use pattern recognition of favorable surface, 850/700 hPa low tracks in forecasting MLC
• Use AWIPS forecast application (based on equation derived from correlated parameters), which provides estimate of inland extent
Application
850 mb Low center tracks
Example of Real-time Application
Example of Real-time Application
Ongoing/Future Work• Infuse forecast applications into
operations
• Develop graphical interface for output from equation
• Evaluate output from AWIPS forecast application
Acknowledgements• Jason Krekeler– NOAA/NWS State College, PA/State
University of NY at Albany
• Hannah Attard– State University of NY at Albany
References• Niziol, Thomas, 1987: Operational
Forecasting of Lake Effect Snowfall in Western and Central New York. Weather and Forecasting.
• Niziol, et al., 1995: Winter Weather Forecasting throughout the Eastern United States – Part IV: Lake Effect Snow. Weather and Forecasting.
[email protected]@noaa.gov
www.weather.gov/alywww.weather.gov/bgmwww.weather.gov/ctp