The influence of climate on influenza A virus introductions in Minnesota turkeys: Spring 2007 - 2015
-
Upload
xi-cassie-guo -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
24 -
download
0
Transcript of The influence of climate on influenza A virus introductions in Minnesota turkeys: Spring 2007 - 2015
![Page 1: The influence of climate on influenza A virus introductions in Minnesota turkeys: Spring 2007 - 2015](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062903/58ed02971a28abca228b463f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The influence of climate on influenza A virus (IAV) introductions in Minnesota turkeys: Spring 2007 - 2015
Xi Guo1, Nitipong Homwong2, Jeanette Munoz-Aguayo3, Cristian Flores3, Carol J. Cardona1
1. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN. 2. Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Sean,
Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. 3. Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center, Willmar, MN, US.
Introduction • Climate affects the transmission cycle of infectious diseases.
• The landscape that gives rise to the transmission of influenza A virus (IAV) between wild
and domesticated avian species is greatly impacted by the climate.
• The behavior of the wild waterfowl, the natural host of IAV, is also affected by the climate
condition.
• In the spring of 2015, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N2 was introduced to
turkeys in Minnesota (MN). Prior to 2015, there were seven low pathogenic avian influenza
(LPAI) introductions occurred in the same area and the same season in the turkey flocks.
Objective • To characterize the climate conditions associated with the Spring introductions of IAV in MN
turkeys.
Data analysis • Daily climatic variables including maximum temperature, minimum temperature and snow
depths during 1960-2015 were retrieved from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
archives. The weather stations selected for data analysis were within 20 miles of the case
sites, which were clustered into five regions.
• Weather indicator correlation analysis
• Spearman correlation was performed between the week of the introduction cases and the
weather indicators including temperature 7 to 9°C, heading degree days (HDD) 18 to 20
days, and the yearly average temperature.
• The cumulative days above freezing point during Feb 15 - Mar 15 during 2007 - 2015 were
calculated. Spearman correlation was performed between the cumulative days above the
freezing point and the week of the introductions.
• Snow depth analysis: Wilcoxon Ranked-sum tests were performed to compare the sum of
snow depths between introduction years and non-introduction years.
Results - B. Correlation between the weather indicators and the timing of the introductions
Results - A. The temporal pattern of daily temperatures
Acknowledgement
•We thank
Pomeroy Legacy
Scholarship for
providing the
funding for the
study.
Conclusion and future direction • The similar temporal patterns of Case 8 and the HPAI cases from other
locations suggest a universal climatic condition that drives the occurrence
of HPAI outbreak.
• Several weather indicators correlate with the timing of the introductions.
These indicators could help to predict the timing of the next IAV introduction
in turkey flocks.
Table 3. Correlation analysis between the weather indicators and the weeks of cases (*p
< 0.05)
Figure 2. Daily minimum temperature of first 150 days in the years of all cases (Blue: lowest
temperature point; Purple: yearly average temperature point; Green: date of the case)
Weather indicator Spearman correlation p
value
Spearman correlation coefficient
The week when weekly average temperature was the closest to 7 °C
0.2005 0.5062
The week when weekly average temperature was the closest to 8 °C
0.0083* 0.8447
The week when weekly average temperature was the closest to 9 °C
0.0532 0.7000
The week when weekly average temperature was the closest to the
yearly average
0.1344 0.5768
The week in which weekly average HDD was the closest to 18
0.0083* 0.8447
The week in which weekly average HDD was the closest to 19
0.0137* 0.8149
The week in which weekly average HDD was the closest to 20
0.2005 0.5062
Date
P > 0.05P < 0.05
Case ID Year Date Subtype County
1 2007 03/22* H7N9 Brown
2 2009 05/06* H7N9 Redwood
3 2011 05/13* H7N9 Wright
4 2012 04/26* H8N4 Kandiyohi
5 2013 05/08* H3N2/H9N2 Kandiyohi
6 2014 05/09 H4N2 Kandiyohi7 2015 02/27 H5N2 Pope8 2015 03/22 H5N2 Lac Qui Parle
Table 1. List of the IAV introduction cases in
Minnesota, 2007 - 2015
Figure 1. Map of the IAV introduction
cases by counties, 2007 - 2015 • Case 7 happened 4 days after the lowest temperature point.
• The relationship between Case 7 and the lowest point resembles the temporal pattern illustrated
by Liu et al (Plos one, 2007), recapitulating the same climate condition for HPAI introductions.
• The Ukraine case locate in the same level of latitude with the Case 7.
• The temperature pattern of other LPAI cases is different from Case 7, suggesting different
mechanism of HPAI and LPAI introductions.
Jan 1 - May 29
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
Case ID
Selected HPAI H5N1 virus outbreaks and the minimum temperatures and dates at nearby WMO (World Meteorological Organization)
stations. (Liu et al, Temperature Drops and the Onset of Severe Avian Influenza A H5N1 Virus Outbreaks. Plos One, 2007)
Variation of daily minimum
temperatures at WMO stations near
H5N1 Virus outbreak areas (Liu, et
al; Plos one, 2007)
• Several weather indicators have
significant positive correlations with
the timing of introductions (p <
0.05).
Figure 3. P Value of spearman correlation test from the count of the
accumulative days above freezing point (X-axis is the date to count the
accumulative days in each cases; Y-axis is p-value. Red point: P-value >
0.05. Green point: P-value < 0.05.)
• The cumulative days
during Feb 22 - Mar 5
were associated with
the week of the cases
(P < 0.05).
Results - C. Snow depths analysisCase Rank (From low to high) Wilcoxon P value
1 26 out of 56 0.90
2 21 out of 56 0.66
3 40 out of 56 0.50
4 27 out of 54 1.00
5 54 out of 56 0.12
6 49 out of 56 0.21
7 11 out of 56 0.29
8 4 out of 55 0.14
Table 4. Wilcoxon signed rank test on the yearly
sum of the snow depths prior to the introduction
dates
• Case 7 and 8 have lower snow
depths than non-introduction
years. Other cases have average
level of snow depths among all
the year.
Snow depths (normalized)
Temperature (normalized)