The importance ofthe relationship between malocclusion and ...
Transcript of The importance ofthe relationship between malocclusion and ...
European Journal of Orthodontics 6 (1984) 192-204© 1984 European Orthodontic Society
The importance of the relationship betweenmalocclusion and mandibular dysfunction andsome clinical applications in adults
Bengt Mohlin and Birgit ThilanderG6teborg, Sweden
Summary. Studies on the relationship between malocclusion and mandibulardysfunction have been performed in adult subjects. Three samples have beenexamined: 56 patients with mandibular dysfunction, 389 men aged 21-54 years and272 women aged 20-46 years.
Approximately 25% of the men and the women had moderate or severedysfunction according to the clinical dysfunction index. Fifteen per cent of the men and34% of the women had subjective symptoms of dysfunction.
Rotation of teeth was correlated with subjective symptoms of mandibulardysfunction in the men and the women. Angle class III malocclusion in the men andneed for orthodontic treatment in the women showed the strongest correlation with theseverity of clinical symptoms of dysfunction. Crossbite and frontal open bite were moreprevalent in the patients with mandibular dysfunction than has been found in otherstudies. Most of these crossbites were associated with lateral displacements of themandible between RP and IP. Bilateral crossbite showed a strong correlation tonon-working side interference in the patients. The results also indicated that theaetiology of mandibular dysfunction is multifactorial.
The implications of these results on" orthodontic treatment indications and someaspects on when the treatment should be performed are discussed.
Five case presentations are given to illustrate the possibilities of orthodontictreatment of adult patients with mandibular dysfunction.
A good knowledge of the relationship between different malocclusions and mandibular dysfunction enables the orthodontist: a.to determine the functional objectives of theorthodontic treatment and hence evaluatethe results of the treatment, b. to judgewhen. orthodontic treatment of mandibulardysfunction may be expected to give a goodresult, and c. to assess the objective need fororthodontic treatment in the growing child.
This assessment has to be made inrelation to the prevalence of dysfunctionand general aetiological factors as well asour knowledge of the indications for orthodontic treatment.
Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction
A number of studies have shown a highprevalence of mandibular dysfunction (forreview, see Mohlin 1982). The figures varywithin fairly wide limits, however. Theprevalence of subjective symptoms of dysfunction ranges from 12 to 57 per cent andthe prevalence of clinically recorded symptoms from 28 to 88 per cent. One of themain reasons for this disagreement is probably imprecise description of the symptomsof mandibular dysfunction. It thereforeseems important to use similar and welldefined criteria when different studies of
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
MALOCCLUSION AND MANDIBULAR DYSFUNCTION
dysfunction are compared. One way ofachieving this is to use an index for clinicaldysfunction, such as the one devised byHelkimo (1974), and to use these definitionswhen formulating questions on subjectivesymptoms. In this index, the symptoms ofreduced movement capacity: deviation onopening, locking or luxation of the mandible, pain on movement, TMJ sounds,muscle- and TMJ tenderness are scored.Each symptom is judged according to athree-grade scale. 'No symptom' is given 0,a mild symptom, 1 and a severe symptom, 5points. The sum of the scores can be used toform the basis of grouping into grades ofdysfunction (O=no dysfunction, I=mild dysfunction, II=moderate dysfunction andIII = severe dysfunction).
Aetiology of mandibular dysfunction
Even with a strict definition of dysfunction,there will still be considerable disagreementabout the importance of different aetiological factors. A number of studies haveindicated an influence of local factors e.g.interferences and malocclusion:
The role of occlusal intereferences hasbeen stressed in some electromyographicstudies (Ramfjord 1961, Schaerer et al.,1967, Randow et al., 1976).
Some malocclusions have been shown toinfluence the mandibular movement pattern (Ahlgren 1967, Ingervall and Thilander 1974). A relationship between posterior crossbite and hyperactivity in thetemporal muscle in the rest position hasbeen found (Haralabakis and Loufty1964, Troelstrup and M01ler 1970,Ingervall and Thilander 1975).
Pain in connection with dual bite wherethere is an open bite in the retrudedcontact position has been reported (Harvold and Poyton 1962).
A correlation between facial morphologyand the activity in the masticatory muscleshas been demonstrated (Ahlgren et al.,
193
1973, Ingervall and Thilander 1974). Individuals with large angles between themaxilla and the mandible generally showa lower than average muscle activity.Ingervall et al., (1979) found that themuscular activity in individuals for whomsurgical treatment of mandibular prognathism was planned was clearly lowerthan in those with normal occlusion. Themuscle activity rose to an almost normallevel within 8 months of surgery. Goodresults of orthodontic treatment for dysfunction have been reported (EgermarkEriksson et al., 1975, Ingervall 1978).Some examples of this will be given laterin this paper.
Factors within the central nervous system have also been strongly emphasized asbeing responsible for development of mandibular dysfunction (Moulton 1955, Laskin1969, Lupton 1969, Molin 1973, Yemm1979, Rugh and Solberg 1979, Olsson 1979).
The influence of emotional and stressfactors acting via the limbic system,hypothalamus and reticular system maycreate an increased level of musculartension (Ericsson and Riise 1974, Solbergand Rugh 1972, Rugh and Solberg 1975).Direct stimulation of the hypothalamus inthe cat has been shown to increase the jawclosing reflex by 10 times (Olsson 1979).
Patients with dysfunction are undergreater emotional stress than others(Evaskus and Laskin 1972). TMJ patientshave a tendency to maintain a high levelof muscle tension in stress situations,contrary to persons without such symptoms (Yemm 1979).
Psychological studies, on the other hand,have failed to describe a specific personality trait for TMJ patients (Dahlstrom1977, Rugh and Solberg 1979).
Together with these two groups ofaetiological factors, social conditions andgeneral health have also been claimed tohave an influence on the development ofmandibular dysfunction (Franks 1964,
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
Figure 1 Factors claimed to have an influence on thedevelopment of dysfunction.
He16e and Heide 1975, Agerberg et al.,1977, Agerberg and Carlsson 1975).
All the aetiological factors that havebeen mentioned are clearly interrelated(Fig. 1). Social conditions have an influenceupon dental health as well as on generalhealth. Poor health probably often createsan increased level of anxiety, which maylead to increased muscle tension. Impulsesfrom occlusal interferences may add toimpulses from other spheres. It thereforeseems to be very difficult to determine therelative importance of different aetiologicalfactors.
194
(GENERAL ~HEALTH V""
L
CNS
V
INTERFERENCESMALOCCLUSION
~ SOCIAL~ FACTORS
~
BENGT MOHLIN AND BIRGIT THILANDER
patients with mandibular dysfunction(Mohlin and Kopp 1978) it was found thatthe number of tipped and rotated teethincreased with age. Furthermore, the prevalence of tooth loss, especially loss ofmolars, has been found to be high in a groupof young and middle-aged Swedish men(Mohlin et al., 1979). Some types of occlusalrelation probably have a greater ability tomaintain stability than others. In.connectionwith periodontitis, for example, there maybe relatively small changes in the occlusionin a case with a good number of teeth incontact, while in a case with severe postnormal occlusion a vertical collapse of theocclusion occurs more easily.
To cover the aspect of occlusal changesin adult ages, and also to cover the longterm functional consequences of untreatedmalocclusions, our studies have dealt onlywith adults.
Present studies in adults on the relationshipbetween malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction
Indications for orthodontic treatment
A morphological malocclusion by itself cannever justify orthodontic treatment exceptwhen it causes, or may cause, aesthetic orfunctional problems. When considering theindications for orthodontic treatment, weseem in some instances to have a fairly poorbasis for decision. This is particularly truefor the correlation between chewing function and malocclusion and also for thecorrelation between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction. We do not know withcertainty which malocclusions should betreated in order to reduce the risk ofdeveloping symptoms of dysfunction.
A difficulty in this context is that we notonly have to deal with malocclusions presentin children but also have to make a prognosis for the long-term development of theocclusion. It is easy to show that majorchanges in the occlusion may occur following, for example, tooth loss. In a group of
Subjects examined. Three different groupsof individuals have been studied (Table 1),with regard to malocclusion, dysfunctionand also social and health conditions. Forfurther details, see Mohlin (1982).
Results. The clinical dysfunction index (Helkimo 1974) showed that 40% of the men and34% of the women were free from clinicalsymptoms (Di 0), while approximately 25%in both groups had moderate or severedysfunction (Division II and III).
Fifteen per cent of the men and 34% ofthe women stated that they had subjectivesymptoms, including headache, TMJ ormuscle pain or difficulty in opening theirmouths. If headache was excluded, as it maynot have any connection with dysfunction,the prevalence was 12% and 28%, respectively. In the group of men, muscle tenderness was the clinically recorded symptomthat showed the closest correlation withsubjective symptoms. Numerous factors
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
MALOCCLUSION AND MANDIBULAR DYSFUNCTION
Table 1 Number of individuals studied and the rate of participation in different examinations.
Method
Age Clinical Dental TotalGroup (years) examination casts Questionnaire number
Patients 16-22 56 56 56Men 21-54 385 357 389 389Women 2~46 205 205 272 272
195
were found to be correlated with subjectivedysfunction symptoms. Many of those factors have no connection with occlusion. Thecorrelation between dysfunction and chestpain may reflect an increased level oftension. Symptoms also seemed to be morecommon in people born in cities than inthose born in the countryside and were alsomore common in people with a low educational level. (Table 2)
The prevalence of malocclusion in nonpatients was found to be at the same level ashas been found in children, in spite of thefact that 9% of the 'men and 25% of thewomen had had orthodontic treatment during their childhood (Table 3). Some malocclusions, especially tipping and rotation ofteeth and deep bite, were more prevalentthan has been found in most studies inchildren. Interventions like tooth extractionhave probably created some of these malocclusions in the adult subjects.
To study the correlations further, regression analyses were performed (Table 4).Owing to the fairly large number of itemstested, only variables with a level of statistical significance of the regression coefficient of p<O.OOl are given. The variablesthat best explained the variation of thedependent variable 'subjective symptoms'were educational level and maxillary crowding, with a negative association, and rotation of teeth, with a positive association.The presence of maxillary crowding probably does not by itself reduce the risk ofdysfunction. Maxillary crowding probablyreflects the dental status. With an increasednumber of missing teeth, the prevalence ofcrowding may be reduced.
The dental status was also found to becorrelated with social conditions and educational level as well as with tipping androtation of teeth in these subjects (Mohlin etal., 1979).
Table 2 Significant rank correlation coefficients between subjectivesymptoms and malocclusion traits, dental status and general variablesin the group of men.
Subjective symptoms(headache included)
Subjectivedysfunction symptoms(headache excluded)
Maxillary crowdingEducational levelChest painMaxillary crowdingNeed for prosthetic
treatment forocclusionrehabilitation
Educational levelPlace of birthWeightTriceps skinfold
-0.18**-0.11 *
0.11*-0.17**
0.12*
-0.18**-0.13*-0.10*-0.10*
*=O.OI<p<O.05, **=p<O.OI
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
196
Table 3 Prevalence of different malocclusions in themale (n=357) and female (n=205) groups studied.Percentage distribution by men and women given.
Dentitional anomalies d Cj?Rotated teeth 68.9 83.9
lateral teeth 51.3 48.8Tipped teeth 30.5 37.1
lateral teeth 24.4 34.1Inversion of incisors 3.1 3.9
Space anomaliesCrowding 42.9 51.2
maxillary 21.0 23.4mandibular 34.5 42.9
Spacing 17.7 14.2maxillary 13.2 7.3mandibular 7.6 5.3
Maxillary medial diastema 2.0 2.0
Occlusal anomaliesExtreme maxillary overjet 10.6 9.8Mandibular overjet 3.1 1.0Deep bite 16.2 11.2Frontal open bite 4.2 3.4Lateral open bite 2.2 1.5Angle class I 80.4 71.2
II:l 8.1 14.6II:2 5.3 10.7III 6.2 2.4
Crossbite 19.3 26.8Scissors bite 3.1 3.4
BENGT MOHLIN AND BIRGIT THILANDER
Variation in the severity of clinicallyrecorded dysfunction according to the indexwas best explained by the independentvariable Angle class III malocclusion in thegroup of men. Using a partial correlationanalysis with age, number of teeth, educational level and place of birth as confounding variables, we found a correlation between clinical symptoms and Angle class IIImalocclusion and also crossbite and need fororthodontic treatment (according to theindex proposed by the National Board ofHealth and Welfare).
Regarding the dependent variable'muscle tenderness', no variables in theregression analyses reached the requiredlevel of significance. Age and Angle class IImalocclusion were the variables that wereclosest to that level. This symptom tendedto decrease in prevalence with increasingage.
In the women, we found the samecorrelation between subjective dysfunctionsymptoms and rotation of teeth as wasfound in the men.
Need for orthodontic treatment was the
Table 4 Independent variables for explaining the variation of the dependent variables Subjective dysfunctionsymptoms, Helkimo's dysfunction index and muscle tenderness in the men and the women examined (n=357 and 205respectively) .
Dependentvariable
Subjective dysfunctionsymptoms
Helkimo's dysfunctionindex
Independentvariable
IMaxillary crowding
d Educational levelRotated teeth
Number of rotated teeth
Angle class IIImalocclusion
Need for orthodontictreatment
Significance ofregression coefficient
-p<0.002-p<0.OO7+p<O.OI
+p<0.0002
+p<0.0003
+p<O.OOOI
Muscle tenderness No variable reached the required level of significance
INeed for orthodontic +p<0.0005Cj? treatment
OR index +p<0.002(need for prosthetic treatment for occlusion rehabilitation)
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
MALOCCLUSION AND MANDIBULAR DYSFUNCTION
variable that best explained the variation inseverity of clinical symptoms. Very fewwomen had Angle class III malocclusionand only one woman showed a mandibularoverjet.
Women with class III malocclusionshowed on average higher dysfunction indexvalues, but the differences were not statistically significant. Need for orthodontic treatment was also correlated with muscletenderness, as was the need for prosthetictreatment for occlusion rehabilitation.
In the group of patients with mandibular dysfunction, two types of malocclusionwere more prevalent than usually found:crossbite (32%) and frontal open bite(160/0). We also found some correlationsbetween occlusal interferences and malocclusion. Unilateral as well as bilateral crossbite were correlated with interferences between the retruded contact position (RP)and the intercuspal position (IP) causing alateral slide (p<0.01). Bilateral crossbiteshowed a correlation with non-working sideinterferences (p<O.Ol). Most of the bilateral crossbites in this group were associatedwith this type of interference. The numberof tipped teeth also showed a correlationwith non-working side interferences(p<0.05).
Conclusions and clinical applications
There seems to be a correlation betweensome malocclusions and mandibular dysfunction. Angle class III malocclusionsshowed the strongest correlation with theseverity of clinical symptoms. Crossbite alsoseemed to be correlated with dysfunction, aconclusion that can be drawn from previousas well as from these studies. Uni- andbilateral crossbite in connection with interferences between RP and IP and bilateralcrossbite in connection with non-workingside interferences seem to have the greatestinfluence on dysfunction. It therefore seemsavisable to check bilateral crossbite withregard to non-working side interferences.
Frontal open bite was found to be very
197
prevalent in patients with dysfunction and itwas also the malocclusion that showed thestrongest correlation with non-working sideinterferences in the men and women. Openbite and Angle class III malocclusion oftenrepresent a facial morphology characterizedby lower than average muscle activity. Theinfluence of tipping and rotation of teethseems to be more difficult to determine asthese malocclusions often reflect a poordental status which, in turn, is related tosocial conditions and other factors whichmay contribute to development of dysfunction. Similar results have been obtained instudies on the relationship between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction in children (Egermark-Eriksson 1982).
As the cause of mandibular dysfunctionis obviously multifactorial, prevention ofsuch disorders alone seldom warrants adecision to start orthodontic treatment butthe correlations found should be consideredin the treatment planning.
The question of the most suitable agefor orthodontic treatment also has to beconsidered in this conext. In some instances,orthodontic treatment of malocclusions thathave caused dysfunction can be successfullyperformed in adults. Patients with crossbitecausing a lateral displacement are besttreated at younger ages. The muscularhyperactivity in the rest position on thecrossbite side in such cases (Haralabakis &Loufty 1964, Troelstrup & M011er 1970,Ingervall and Thilander 1975) indicates thatthe growth pattern may be unfavourablyinfluenced. Early treatment of such casestherefore seems preferable. The nature ofthe relationship between facial morphologyand muscular activity in cases with Angleclass III malocclusion or skeletal open bitedoes not seem to be fully understood. It thusseems difficult to predict whether earlyorthodontic treatment of such malocclusionswill normalize the activity of the masticatorymuscles and result in a more harmoniousfacial development. Longitudinal studies ofskeletal and occlusal development withreference to dysfunction in orthodonticallytreated and untreated children are needed.
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
198
Another interesting field of study is thecorrelation between malocclusion, dysfunction and perception of mandibularposition (Thilander 1961).
Case presentations
On the following pages are some examplesof orthodontic treatment of adult subjectswith mandibular dysfunction.
BENGT MOHLIN AND BIRGIT THILANDER
Address for correspondence
Bengt Mohlin,Department of Orthodontics,Faculty of Odontology,University of Goteborg,Box 33070,S-400 33 Goteborg, Sweden.
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
;s: ;.. t'"'" o ('1 ('1 t'"'" C r.n (5 Z ;.. Z c ;s: ;.. z o ;; C t'"'" ;.. :;:0 tl -<: tr:
'Tl
C Z 9 o z
Fig
ure
2(a
)A
34-y
ear-
old
man
with
abi
late
ral
open
bite
.H
eha
don
lya
few
dent
alco
ntac
ts.
He
com
plai
ned
ofch
ewin
gdi
ffic
ultie
san
dch
roni
che
adac
he,
whi
chhe
asso
ciat
edw
ithhi
sm
aloc
clus
ion.
(b)
Tre
atm
ent:
Th
em
axil
lary
dent
alar
chw
asex
pand
edw
itha
fixe
dap
plia
nce.
Th
eor
thod
onti
ctr
eatm
ent
was
com
plet
ed6
mon
ths
late
rby
occl
usal
grin
ding
.T
hepa
tien
tw
asth
enfr
eefr
omsy
mpt
oms.
(c)
Tw
oye
ars
late
rth
epa
tien
tis
quit
efr
eefr
omhe
adac
hean
dhi
sch
ewin
gab
ility
isgo
od.
.......
\0 \0
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
Fig
ure
3(a
)A
32-y
ear-
old
wom
anw
hoha
dha
dfr
eque
nthe
adac
hefo
rse
vera
lye
ars.
She
had
cons
ulte
dfo
rth
isse
vera
ltim
esbu
tth
ere
had
been
noim
prov
emen
t.Sh
ew
asaw
are
that
she
clen
ched
and
grou
ndhe
rte
eth.
The
rew
asa
prem
atur
eco
ntac
t24/
34in
RP
and
ano
n-w
orki
ngsi
dein
terf
eren
ce17
/47
onla
tero
trus
ion
toth
ele
ft.
She
had
tend
erne
ssin
the
ante
rior
tem
pora
lm
uscl
eon
the
left
side
and
inth
em
asse
ter
mus
cles
onbo
thsi
des.
The
mus
cles
wer
ete
nse
and
hard
.T
here
was
acr
ossb
ite
onth
ele
ftsi
de.
(b)
Tre
atm
ent:
Th
em
axill
ary
arch
was
expa
nded
with
alin
gual
arch
and
alig
ned
with
ala
bial
arch
.T
hepa
tien
tw
asth
enre
tain
edw
ithan
uppe
rpl
ate
and
twis
tfle
xre
tain
erfo
ron
eye
ar.
(c)
She
isno
wpr
acti
call
yfr
eefr
omhe
rhe
adac
he.
N 8 I::t:I
t'Ij Z ~ ~ o :I: t'"" Z > z o I::t
:I ;;; o :::i ..., :I: t= > z o rn :;J:l
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
Fig
ure
4(a
)A
56-y
ear-
old
man
with
anan
teri
orfo
rced
cros
sbite
.H
eha
dha
dfr
eque
nthe
adac
hefo
rm
any
year
s.H
ew
asaw
are
that
hecl
ench
edan
dgr
ound
his
teet
h.(b
)T
reat
men
t:A
bite
plan
ew
asfi
tted
inth
em
axill
ary
arch
with
sim
ulta
neou
sco
rrec
tion
ofth
ean
teri
orcr
ossb
ite.
One
low
erin
ciso
rw
asex
trac
ted
and
the
low
erla
bial
segm
ent
was
alig
ned
with
afi
xed
appl
ianc
e.F
our
mon
ths
late
r,a
new
rem
ovab
lepa
rtia
lde
ntur
ew
asm
ade
for
the
max
illar
yar
ch.
The
pati
ent
has
now
been
free
from
sym
ptom
sfo
rse
vera
lye
ars.
~ > t"" o o o t"" C C/l o Z > Z o :: > z o ;; c ~ ~ c -..:: C/l
'TI
C z Q o z N o .......
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
N ~
Fig
ure
5(a
)A
30-y
ear-
old
man
with
abi
late
ral
scis
sors
bite
with
few
occl
usal
cont
acts
caus
edby
ana
rrow
man
dibu
lar
dent
alar
ch(b
)H
esu
ffer
edfr
omse
vere
pain
from
the
TM
J-re
gion
s,es
peci
ally
whe
nch
ewin
g.T
reat
men
t:T
hem
andi
bula
rde
ntal
arch
was
expa
nded
with
afi
xed
appl
ianc
ew
hich
was
repl
aced
bya
lingu
alre
tain
er6
mon
ths
late
r(b
).A
good
occl
usio
nw
asob
tain
ed(c
)an
dth
epa
tien
tis
quite
free
from
his
TM
J-sy
mpt
oms.
t:l:l
t"!'l
Z o ..., ~ o :J::
t"'" Z ;.:. Z tl t:l:l~ o ::::; =a r= ;.:. z tl t"I"
I::0
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
S';
;» t"'" o n n r C rJJ o Z ;» Z tl :: ;» z tl 0; C r ;» :;:0 e -< rJJ
'Tl c: Z o ..., o z
Fig
ure
6A
53-y
ear-
old
wom
anw
ithde
epbi
te(a
)w
hoco
mpl
aine
dof
tend
erne
ssov
erth
efo
rehe
adan
din
the
regi
onof
the
ante
rior
tem
pora
lm
uscl
e,fo
rex
ampl
ew
hen
was
hing
her
face
orha
ving
her
hair
cut.
The
rew
asal
sopa
inth
atth
epa
tien
tco
uld
dist
ingu
ish
from
aco
mm
onhe
adac
he.
She
was
awar
eth
atsh
ecl
ench
edan
dgr
ound
her
teet
h.A
fter
havi
ngcl
ench
edhe
rte
eth
she
felt
ast
iffn
ess
inth
eja
wm
uscl
esan
dsh
eal
soha
ddi
ffic
ulty
inta
lkin
g.Sh
eha
dex
peri
ence
dth
isdi
scom
fort
for
seve
ral
year
s,bu
tth
esy
mpt
oms
had
grad
uall
ygr
own
mor
ese
vere
.T
here
was
am
arke
dte
nder
ness
topa
lpat
ion
ofth
ean
teri
orte
mpo
ral
mus
cle
and
ofth
ede
eppo
rtio
nof
the
mas
sete
rm
uscl
e.(b
)T
reat
men
t:W
hen
the
bite
was
rais
ed6
mm
with
anoc
clus
albi
tepl
ane,
her
pain
was
mar
kedl
yre
duce
d.T
heoc
clus
albi
tepl
ane
was
then
chan
ged
toa
fixe
don
eof
cap
splin
tty
pe.
The
low
erar
chw
asex
pand
edby
mea
nsof
afi
xed
appl
ianc
ean
dcr
oss
elas
tics.
The
max
illa
ryar
chw
asth
enco
mpr
esse
dw
itha
rem
ovab
lepl
ate.
Aft
eror
thod
onti
ctr
eatm
ent
alo
wer
brid
gew
asin
sert
ed(c
).T
hepa
tien
t'sm
axim
alop
enin
gca
paci
tyw
asno
rmal
ized
afte
rtr
eatm
ent
and
she
has
now
been
free
from
sym
ptom
sfo
rse
vera
lye
ars.
tv o i»
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from
204
References
Agerberg G, Carlsson G E 1975 Symptoms of functional disturbances of the masticatory system. Acomparison of frequencies in a population sampleand in a group of patients. Acta OdontologicaScandinavica 33: 183-190
Agerberg G, Carlsson G E, Hallqvist C 1977 Bettstatusoch dysfunktionssymptom i relation till nagra socialafaktorer. Tandlakartidningen 69: 194-203
Ahlgren J 1967 Pattern of chewing and malocclusion ofteeth. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 25: 3-13
Ahlgren J, Ingervall B, Thilander B 1973 Muscleactivity in normal and postnormal occlusion.American Journal of Orthodontics 64: 445-456
Dahlstrom L 1977 Psykiska karakteristika hos patientermed mandibular dysfunk tion. Tandlakartidningen69: 144-155
Egermark-Eriksson I, Ingervall B, Carlsson G E 1975Tandreglering som behandling av patienter medkakledsbesvar. Tandlakartidningen 67: 404-413
Egermark-Eriksson I 1982 Mandibular dysfunction inchildren and in individuals with dual bite. SwedishDental Journal Supplement 10
Ericsson, S G, Riise C 1974 Muskular hyperaktivitetIn: Bidfunktion. Bettfysiologi. Eds. Krogh-Poulsen,W. and Carlsen O. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp.315-328
Evaskus D S, Laskin D M 1972 A biomechanicalmeasure of stress in patients with myofacial paindysfunction syndrome. Journal of Dental Research51: 1464-1466
Franks A S T 1964 The social character of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Dental Practitioner15: 94-100
Haralabakis V, Loufty S 1964 An electromyographicanalysis of a series of fifty treated posterior crossbites. Transactions of the European OrthodonticSociety 206-220
Harvold E P, Payton H G 1962 Syndrome of dual biteassociated with open bite. The Canadian DentalAssociation Journal 28: 617-626
Helkimo M 1974 Studies on function and dysfunction ofthe masticatory system II. Index for anamnestic andclinical dysfunction and occlusal state. SwedishDental Journal 67: 101-121
Helc)e B, Heloe LA 1975 Characteristics of a group ofpatients with temporomandibular joint disorders.Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 3:72-79
Ingervall B, Thilander B 1974 Relation between facialmorphology and activity of masticatory muscles.Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1: 131-147
Ingervall B, Thilander B 1975 Activity of temporal andmasseter muscles in children with a lateral forcedbite. Angle Orthodontist 45: 249-25,8
Ingervall B 1978 Orthodontic treatment in adultswith temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms.American Journal of Orthodontics 73: 551-559
Ingervall B, Ridell A, Thilander B 1979 Changes inactivity of the temporal, masseter and lip muscles
BENGT MOHLIN AND BIRGIT THILANDER
after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.International Journal of Oral Surgery 8: 290-300
Laskin D M. 1969 Etiology of the pain-dysfunctionsyndrome. Journal of the American Dental Association 79: 147-153
Lupton D E. 1969 Psychological aspects of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Journal of theAmerican Dental Association 79: 131-136
Mohlin B, Kopp S 1978 A clinical study of therelationship between malocclusions, occlusal interferences and mandibular pain and dysfunction.Swedish Dental Journal 2: 105-112
Mohlin B, Ingervall B, Thilander B 1979 Tooth loss,prosthetics and dental treatment habits in a group ofSwedish men. Community Dentistry and OralEpidemiology 7: ]01-106
Mohlin B 1982 Need for Orthodontic treatment withspecial reference to mandibular dysfunction. Thesis.University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Molin C 1973 Studies in mandibular pain dysfunctionsyndrome. Diss. Swedish Dental Journal, VoL 66,Supp!. No.4
Moulton R E 1955 Psychiatric considerations in maxillofacial pain. Journal of the American Dental Association 51: 408-414
Olsson K A 1979 Hypothalamic and cortical control ofjaw reflexes. Diss. University of Umea, Sweden
Ramfjord S P 196] Bruxism, a clinical and electrornyographic study. Journal of the American DentalAssociation, 62: 21-44
Randow K, Carlsson K, Edlund J, Oberg T 1976 Theeffect of an occlusal intereference on the masticatorysystem. Odontologisk Revy 27: 245-256
Rugh J D, Solberg W K 1975 Electromyographicstudies of bruxist behavior before and during treatment. Journal of Dental Research 54 (Special IssueA). Abstr. L563
Rugh J D, Solberg W K 1979 Psychological implications in temporomandibular pain and dysfunction.In: Zarb G A and Carlsson G E (eds.). Temporomandibular joint. Function and dysfunction. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp. 239-268
Schaerer P, Stallard R E, Zander H A 1967 Occlusalinterferences and mastication. A electromyographicstudy. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 17: 438--449
Solberg W K, Rugh J 0 1972 The use of biofeedbackdevices in the treatment of bruxism. Journal ofSouthern California Dental Association 40: 852-853
Thilander B 1961 Innervation of the temporomandibular joint capsule in man. Transactions of the RoyalSchools of Dentistry. The Umea Research Library.Series 2:7.
Troelstrup B, Meller E 1970 Electromyography of thetemporalis and masseter muscles in children withunilateral crossbite. Scandinavian Journal of DentalResearch 78: 425-430
Yemm R 1979 Neurophysiologic studies of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. In: Zarb G A andCarlsson G E (eds.). Temporomandibular joint.Function and dysfunction. Munksgaard,Copenhagen, pp. 215-237
by guest on March 5, 2016
Dow
nloaded from