Modelling of Distributional Impacts of Energy Subsidy Reforms: An Illustration with Indonesia
The impact of selected structural reforms: Adjustment speed and distributional effects
-
Upload
laith-bates -
Category
Documents
-
view
31 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The impact of selected structural reforms: Adjustment speed and distributional effects
The impact of selected structural reforms:
Adjustment speed and distributional effects
Annabelle MourouganeLukas Vogel
OECD Economics Department
14th DUBROVNIK ECONOMIC CONFERENCE
Introduction
• Good understanding of the long-term effects of structural reforms
• Little is known about short-term effects of reforms
• Crucial from a political economy point of view
Roadmap
• Tools used in the paper• Delays of adjustment• Effects of existing market rigidities
on the speed of adjustment• Interactions with monetary policy
and international spillovers• Distributional effects of reforms
A set of complementary tools
• Data on institutions provides us insights on ex-post effects of reforms
• Models are useful for ex-ante assessments Macro-economic neo-Keynesian models DGE model
The equilibrium unemployment rate and the contribution of institutions in the European Union
Note: The sample includes the 20 countries examined in Bassainini and Duval (2006) except Germany, Finland and Sweden.
5
6
7
8
9
10
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Equilibrium unemploymentper cent
0
1
2
3
4
5
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Replacement ratepercentage point
5
6
7
8
9
10
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Tax wedgepercentage point
0
1
2
3
4
5
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Product market regulationpercentage point
The impact of structural reforms is gradual
Correlation [(INSTt-i),NAIRUt –NAIRUt-i)]
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15la
g 1
lag
2
lag
3
lag
4
lag
5
lag
6
lag
7
lag
8
lag
9
lag
10
Average replacement ratio
years
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
lag
1
lag
2
lag
3
lag
4
lag
5
lag
6
lag
7
lag
8
lag
9
lag
10
Tax wedge
years
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
lag
1
lag
2
lag
3
lag
4
lag
5
lag
6
lag
7
lag
8
lag
9
lag
10
EPL
years
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
lag
1
lag
2
lag
3
lag
4
lag
5
lag
6
lag
7
lag
8
lag
9
lag
10
Product market regulation
years
Modelling rigidities in the DGE model
• Employment and price adjustment costs
• Quadratic forms
Employment:
Price:
Hiring and firing and price adjustment costs are found to have a limited effects on the speed…
Effect of a 1 percentage point income tax rate cut(Change compared to baseline)
This result holds for a number of reforms
Cut in social security contributions
Cut in the benefit replacement rate
And is robust to the way the labour market is modelled
Search-and-matching model(Change compared to baseline)
Monetary policy can speed up the adjustment in the United States…
Impact on production of a one percentage point decline in the NAIRU
(Change compared to baseline)
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
United States
without monetary policy reactionwith monetary policy reaction
quarters
%
… but less so in the euro area…
Impact on production of a one percentage point decline in the NAIRU
(Change compared to baseline)
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Euro area
without monetary policy reactionwith monetary policy reaction
quarters
%
… even with an alternative monetary policy reaction
Impact of a one percentage point decline in the NAIRU
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Euro area real GDP(difference from baseline)
Taylor rule (0.5, 0.5) Inflation targeting
Taylor rule (0.2, 0.8) US real GDP with Taylor rule (0.5, 0.5)
quarters
%
… and even less so in individual euro area countries
Example of France
Impact on production of a one percentage point decline in the NAIRU
(Change compared to baseline)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
France
without monetary policy reactionwith monetary policy reaction
quarters
%
International spillovers are very small
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Real GDP
United States Euro area
quarters
%
Impact of a one percentage point decline in the U.S. NAIRU
(Change compared to baseline)
Distributional effects of reforms
Introduction of two types of households in the DGE model:
Fully optimising households: unlimited access to financial markets, fully optimise their consumption decisions
Liquidity-constrained households: can only consume their disposable income at each period
Potential short-term costs of structural reforms
Income tax cut Replacement rate cut Social contribution cut
Effects of a budgetary compensation scheme
Cut in the benefit replacement rate(Change compared to baseline)
Concluding remarks
• The impact of structural reforms is gradual and takes years to materialise.
• Employment and price adjustment costs are found to have a very small impact on adjustment speed.
• Monetary policy can fasten significantly the adjustment process but mostly in the United States.
• Structural reforms can have different distributional implications.