The Impact of Rating Agencies on the Insurance Industry – Fitch … · 2016-10-10 · 3 The...
Transcript of The Impact of Rating Agencies on the Insurance Industry – Fitch … · 2016-10-10 · 3 The...
Keith
M. B
uckle
y, CF
AH
ead
of G
loba
l Ins
uran
ce /
Man
agin
g D
irect
or
Oct
ober
14,
201
6
The
Impa
ct o
f Rat
ing
Agen
cies
on th
e In
sura
nce
Indu
stry
–Fi
tch
Ratin
gsCI
PR W
ebin
ar
1
Cont
ents
1Ab
out F
itch
2Ra
tings
Pro
cess
Ove
rvie
w
3Ra
tings
Equ
ival
ence
“Whi
te P
aper
”
2
Abou
t Fitc
h
3
The
Glo
bal R
atin
g Ag
ency
with
Loc
al M
arke
t Exp
erie
nce
Who
We
Are
Fi
tch
Rat
ings
isa
glob
alra
ting
agen
cyco
mm
itted
topr
ovid
ing
valu
ebe
yond
the
ratin
gth
roug
hin
depe
nden
tand
pros
pect
ive
cred
itop
inio
ns,
rese
arch
and
data
W
eof
fer
aw
orld
ofkn
owle
dge
and
expe
rienc
ebe
hind
ever
yop
inio
n,w
etra
nsfo
rmin
form
atio
nto
deliv
erm
eani
ngan
dut
ility
toin
vest
ors,
issu
ers
and
othe
rmar
ketp
artic
ipan
ts
Our
glob
alex
perti
sedr
aws
onlo
calm
arke
tkno
wle
dge
and
span
sth
efix
edin
com
eun
iver
se
The
addi
tiona
lco
ntex
t,pe
rspe
ctiv
ean
din
sigh
tw
epr
ovid
ehe
lpin
vest
ors
mak
eim
porta
ntcr
edit
judg
emen
tsw
ithco
nfid
ence
Key
Fac
ts
Foun
ded
in 1
913,
the
Fitc
h G
roup
has
dua
l hea
dqua
rters
in L
ondo
n an
d N
ew Y
ork
and
over
2,8
00 e
mpl
oyee
s gl
obal
ly
Maj
ority
ow
ned
by H
ears
t Cor
pora
tion
D
iver
sifie
d fin
anci
al s
ervi
ces
grou
p op
erat
ing
acro
ss c
redi
t rat
ings
, fin
anci
al d
ata
solu
tions
and
trai
ning
Glo
bal P
rese
nce
37
offi
ces
wor
ldw
ide
Dee
p A
naly
tical
Cov
erag
e
Div
erse
Glo
bal
Is
suer
Cov
erag
e
11
4 S
over
eign
s
3,78
7 B
anks
and
NB
FIs
(exc
. Ger
man
co-
op &
sav
ings
ban
ks)
1,
241
Insu
ranc
e
2,81
8C
orpo
rate
s
419
Glo
bal I
nfra
stru
ctur
e P
roje
cts
7,
400
Stru
ctur
ed F
inan
ce u
nder
sur
veilla
nce
Rese
arch
D
istr
ibut
ion
Po
wer
ful d
istri
butio
n pl
atfo
rm th
roug
h fit
chra
tings
.com
1,
500+
dis
tinct
inst
itutio
nal s
ubsc
riber
s
40,0
00+
indi
vidu
al u
sers
Th
ousa
nds
of in
vest
ors
atte
nd c
orpo
rate
eve
nts
and
inve
stor
mee
tings
ann
ually
Mum
bai
Mon
terr
eyM
exic
o C
ity
San
Jose
San
Sal
vado
r
Sant
iago
São
Pau
lo
Bogo
ta
Mila
n
Bar
celo
naM
adrid
Rio
de
Jane
iro
Mon
tevi
deo
Paris
Fran
kfur
tW
arsa
w
Mos
cow C
olom
bo
Toky
o
Hon
g K
ong
Seou
l
Bang
kok
Taip
ei
Beijin
g
Sing
apor
e
Sydn
eyJa
karta
Dub
ai
Toro
nto
New
Yor
k
Chi
cago
San
Fran
cisc
o
Aust
in
Stoc
khol
m
Shan
ghai
Lond
on
Ista
nbul
4
Fitc
h M
arke
t Pos
ition
–N
orth
Am
erica
n In
sura
nce
Ratin
gs
91%
83%
Fitc
h In
sura
nce
Mar
ket S
hare
:20
15 N
.A. I
ssua
nce
Volu
me
Fitc
h Li
fe/H
ealth
Cov
erag
eN
.A. T
op 3
5
•Fi
tch
rate
s 38
3 Pr
oper
ty &
Cas
ualty
Insu
ranc
e en
titie
s in
Nor
th A
mer
ica
5
Ratin
gs P
roce
ss O
verv
iew
6
Fitc
h Ra
tings
: Crit
eria
Mas
ter I
nsur
ance
Crit
eria
incl
udes
K
ey C
redi
t Fac
tors
H
ybrid
Sec
uriti
es
G
roup
Rat
ing
Met
hodo
logy
N
otch
ing
Met
hodo
logy
S
tart-
up a
nd R
un-o
ff C
ompa
nies
S
hort-
term
Rat
ings
R
ecov
ery
Ana
lysi
s
C
aptiv
e In
sura
nce
Com
pani
es
Sep
arat
e IL
S C
riter
ia
7
Fitc
h Ra
tings
: Key
Cre
dit F
acto
rs
Key
Qua
litat
ive
Fact
ors
Key
Qua
ntita
tive
Fact
ors
So
vere
ign
and
coun
try-r
elat
ed c
onst
rain
ts
Cap
italis
atio
n an
d le
vera
ge
In
dust
ry p
rofil
e an
d op
erat
ing
envi
ronm
ent
D
ebt s
ervi
ce c
apab
ilitie
s an
d fin
anci
alfle
xibi
lity
B
usin
ess
prof
ile
Fina
ncia
l per
form
ance
and
ear
ning
s
O
wne
rshi
p
Inve
stm
ent a
nd a
sset
risk
C
orpo
rate
gov
erna
nce
and
man
agem
ent
As
set/L
iabi
lity
and
liqui
dity
man
agem
ent
R
eser
ve a
dequ
acy
R
eins
uran
ce, r
isk
miti
gatio
n, c
atas
troph
e ris
k
IFS
Rat
ing
Cat
egor
yA
AA
AA
AB
BB
<BB
B
Non
-Life
Rei
nsur
ance
line
s
Com
posi
te
Life
Insu
ranc
e
Rat
ings
Ran
ge B
ased
on
Indu
stry
Pro
file/
Ope
ratin
g E
nviro
nmen
t
8
Fitc
h Ra
tings
: Sec
tor C
redi
t Fac
tors
Incr
ease
s Tr
ansp
aren
cy
S
uppl
emen
tary
repo
rts d
escr
ibin
g th
e ke
y cr
edit
fact
ors
used
to a
naly
ze s
peci
fic
sect
ors
and
regi
ons
In
clud
ing
vario
us m
edia
n fin
anci
al ra
tios
by
ratin
g ca
tego
ry, a
s w
ell a
s ch
arts
that
de
mon
stra
te h
ow k
ey q
ualit
ativ
e fa
ctor
s af
fect
a ty
pica
l rat
ing
rang
e
9
Ratin
gs E
quiv
alen
ce “W
hite
Pap
er”
10
Fitc
h w
hite
pap
er re
visit
ed
“N
ot A
ll In
sure
r Fin
anci
al S
treng
th R
atin
gs A
re C
reat
ed E
qual
”
W
hite
Pap
er o
n La
ck o
f Com
para
bilit
y of
A.M
. Bes
t’s ‘A
-’ IF
S R
atin
gs to
Tho
se o
f Fitc
h
P
ublis
hed
by F
itch
in J
uly
2016
K
ey C
oncl
usio
n: A
n ‘A
-’ In
sure
r Fin
anci
al S
treng
th (I
FS) r
atin
g fro
m A
M B
est i
s m
ost c
ompa
rabl
e to
a ‘B
BB
’ IFS
ratin
g fro
m F
itch
(as
wel
l as
S&
P an
d M
oody
’s)
W
e ur
ge ra
tings
use
rs to
mod
ify ra
tings
equ
ival
ency
sta
ndar
ds th
at c
urre
ntly
trea
t ‘A
-’ ra
tings
from
all
agen
cies
the
sam
e
11
Fitc
h w
hite
pap
er re
visit
ed
Fo
ur a
reas
with
unq
uest
iona
ble
com
para
bilit
y is
sues
at ‘
A-’
N
ewly
form
ed (r
e)in
sure
rs
Hig
h co
untry
risk
/low
sov
erei
gn ra
tings
C
aptiv
es
Sm
alle
r siz
ed in
sure
rs
In
thes
e ca
ses,
AM
Bes
t ofte
n as
sign
s ‘A
-’ IF
S ra
tings
whe
n Fi
tch
wou
ld ra
te in
the
‘BB
B’ r
ange
12
Fitc
h w
hite
pap
er re
visit
ed
D
iven
by b
oth
crite
ria a
nd ra
ting
scal
e di
ffere
nces
A
M B
est’s
crit
eria
wei
ghs
certa
in ri
sks
in a
ver
y di
ffere
nt m
anne
r tha
n Fi
tch
(as
wel
l as
Moo
dy’s
and
S&
P)
Fo
r exa
mpl
e, F
itch
will
con
stra
in ra
tings
for s
tart-
up a
nd s
over
eign
risk
s, w
hich
we
view
as
mat
eria
l, an
d A
M B
est c
onsi
ders
less
mat
eria
l
A
M B
est’s
Fin
anci
al S
treng
th R
atin
g (F
SR
)* s
cale
is d
iffer
ent,
and
has
few
er
cate
gorie
s
Th
us, c
erta
in A
M B
est r
atin
g ca
tego
ries,
incl
udin
g ‘A
-’, a
re n
atur
ally
“lar
ger”
* Not
e: F
SR
and
IFS
are
inte
rcha
ngea
ble
term
s
13
Fitc
h w
hite
pap
er re
visit
ed
W
e al
so e
xam
ined
diff
eren
ces
in h
isto
ric s
tatis
tical
ratin
gs p
erfo
rman
ce
Fi
tch,
S&
P an
d M
oody
’s h
ave
very
sim
ilar p
erfo
rman
ce
A
M B
est’s
per
form
ance
app
ears
to b
e le
ss fa
vora
ble
at ‘A
-’
In
fairn
ess,
par
t of r
easo
n is
diff
eren
t mea
sure
men
t met
hod,
as
AM
Bes
t rep
orts
im
pairm
ent r
ates
and
the
othe
r age
ncie
s re
port
defa
ult r
ates
14
Fitc
h w
hite
pap
er re
visit
ed
A
M B
est 1
0-ye
ar im
pairm
ent r
ate
at ‘A
-’ is
6.7
%
Fi
tch
10-y
ear d
efau
lt ra
te a
t ‘A
-’ is
2.0
%
A
6.7%
impa
irmen
t rat
e m
ost c
lose
ly a
ligns
with
Fitc
h’s
‘BB
B’ I
FS r
atin
g de
faul
t ra
te
“…Fi
tch
reco
gniz
es im
pairm
ents
are
exp
ecte
d to
occ
ur a
t a h
ighe
r fre
quen
cy th
an d
efau
lts.
How
ever
, Fitc
h al
so b
elie
ves
the
note
d di
ffere
nces
at ‘
A-’
falls
out
side
nor
mal
impa
irmen
t ve
rsus
def
ault
expe
ctat
ions
. Non
ethe
less
, rea
ders
are
cau
tione
d to
kee
p th
e di
ffere
nces
be
twee
n im
pairm
ents
and
def
aults
in m
ind
whe
n dr
awin
g th
eir o
wn
conc
lusi
ons.
”
15
Insu
ranc
e Jo
urna
l Sur
vey
Less
than
one
qua
rter
of r
espo
nden
ts fe
lt an
‘A-’
from
A.M
. Be
st a
nd F
itch
wer
e co
mpa
rabl
e.
Sou
rce:
Insu
ranc
e Jo
urna
l –27
Sep
tem
ber 2
016
16
NAI
C Re
insu
ranc
e (E
) Tas
k Fo
rce
2016
Sum
mer
Nat
iona
l Mee
ting
–27
Aug
ust 2
016
Rei
nsur
ance
(E) T
ask
Forc
e di
scus
sed
Fitc
h W
hite
Pap
er o
n IF
S R
atin
g C
ompa
rabi
lity
“The
Tas
k Fo
rce
note
d th
at th
e is
sue
will
be
revi
ewed
in g
reat
er d
etai
l dur
ing
the
next
eva
luat
ion
of th
e ap
prop
riate
am
ount
of c
olla
tera
l tha
t sh
ould
be
post
ed fo
r cer
tifie
d re
insu
rers
.”
17
Fitc
h R
atin
gs’ c
redi
t rat
ings
rely
on
fact
ual i
nfor
mat
ion
rece
ived
from
issu
ers
and
othe
r sou
rces
.Fi
tch
Rat
ings
can
not e
nsur
e th
at a
ll su
ch in
form
atio
n w
ill be
acc
urat
e an
d co
mpl
ete.
Fur
ther
, rat
ings
are
inhe
rent
ly fo
rwar
d-lo
okin
g, e
mbo
dy
assu
mpt
ions
and
pre
dict
ions
that
by
thei
r nat
ure
cann
ot b
e ve
rifie
d as
fact
s, a
nd c
an b
e af
fect
ed b
y fu
ture
eve
nts
or c
ondi
tions
that
wer
e no
t an
ticip
ated
at t
he ti
me
a ra
ting
was
issu
ed o
r affi
rmed
.Th
e in
form
atio
n in
this
pre
sent
atio
n is
pro
vide
d “a
s is
” with
out a
ny re
pres
enta
tion
or w
arra
nty.
A F
itch
Rat
ings
cre
dit r
atin
g is
an
opin
ion
as to
the
cred
itwor
thin
ess
of a
sec
urity
and
doe
s no
t add
ress
the
risk
of lo
ss d
ue to
risk
s ot
her t
han
cred
it ris
k, u
nles
s su
ch ri
sk is
spec
ifica
lly m
entio
ned.
A
Fitc
h R
atin
gs re
port
is n
ot a
sub
stitu
te fo
r inf
orm
atio
n pr
ovid
ed to
inve
stor
s by
the
issu
er a
nd it
s ag
ents
in c
onne
ctio
n w
ith a
sale
of s
ecur
ities
.R
atin
gs m
ay b
e ch
ange
d or
with
draw
n at
any
tim
e fo
r any
reas
on in
the
sole
dis
cret
ion
of F
itch
Rat
ings
. The
age
ncy
does
not
pro
vide
inve
stm
ent
advi
ce o
f any
sor
t. R
atin
gs a
re n
ot a
reco
mm
enda
tion
to b
uy, s
ell,
or h
old
any
secu
rity.
A
LL F
ITC
H C
RE
DIT
RAT
ING
S A
RE
SU
BJE
CT
TO C
ER
TAIN
LIM
ITAT
ION
S A
ND
DIS
CLA
IME
RS
. PLE
AS
E R
EA
D T
HE
SE
LIM
ITAT
ION
S A
ND
D
ISC
LAIM
ER
S A
ND
TH
E T
ER
MS
OF
US
E O
F S
UC
H R
ATIN
GS
AT
WW
W.F
ITC
HR
ATIN
GS
.CO
M.
Disc
laim
er
New
Yor
kLo
ndon
33 W
hite
hall
Stre
etN
ew Y
ork
NY
1004
30 N
orth
Col
onna
deC
anar
y W
harf
Lond
on, E
14 5
GN