The Impact of Induction on Local Districts

21
The Impact of Induction on Local Districts Roles and Responsibilities of K-12 Organizations Training

description

The Impact of Induction on Local Districts. Roles and Responsibilities of K-12 Organizations Training. Student Achievement. Home & Family Factors 49%. (parent education, income, language background, race and location). Teacher Qualifications 43%. (licensing, examination, and experience). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Impact of Induction on Local Districts

Page 1: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

The Impact of Induction on Local Districts

The Impact of Induction on Local Districts

Roles and Responsibilities of K-12 Organizations Training

Roles and Responsibilities of K-12 Organizations Training

Page 2: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

Student AchievementStudent Achievement

Home & Family Factors

49%(parent

education, income,

language background,

race and location)

Class Size

8%

Teacher Qualifications

43%(licensing,

examination, and experience)

Developed from data presented in Ronald F. Ferguson, “Paying for Public Education: New Evidence of How and Why Money Matters”, Harvard Journal on Legislation 28 (Summer 1991): 465-98

Page 3: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

Teacher QualityTeacher QualityTeacher QualityTeacher Quality

From the Report of the National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future, What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future, c1996

From the Report of the National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future, What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future, c1996

“A caring, competent, and qualified teacher for every child is the most important ingredient in education reform and, we believe the most frequently overlooked.”

Page 4: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

Teacher RetentionTeacher RetentionTeacher RetentionTeacher Retention

. . .the studies provide empirical support for the claim that assistance for new teachers and, in particular, mentoring programs have a positive impact on teachers and their retention.

. . .the studies provide empirical support for the claim that assistance for new teachers and, in particular, mentoring programs have a positive impact on teachers and their retention.

The Impact of Mentoring on Teacher Retention: What the Research Says by Richard Ingersoll and Jeffrey M. Kralik Research Review, 2004

Page 5: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

State Funding State Funding

• Based on the number of participating teachers

• Consent form submitted to CTC who verifies numbers • CDE funds participants in two allotments, in the second fiscal quarter and the fourth fiscal quarter

• Current funding for the 2006-2007 fiscal year is $3875 per beginning teacher

Page 6: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

District ResponsibilitiesDistrict Responsibilities

• In-Kind contribution of $2,000 per participating teacher

• Leadership position to implement the approved plan

• Support Provider

• Formative Assessment work

• Professional Development activities

--based on IIP

--to equip participating teachers to demonstrate competency in required elements

• Partner with colleges/universities for seamless matriculation

Page 7: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

Teacher Profiles:

How these factors impact a new teacher’s professional development and credentialing

status

Teacher Profiles:

How these factors impact a new teacher’s professional development and credentialing

status

Page 8: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in May and put into a district pool• Hired in May and put into a district pool• Placed at a school in June

Teacher #1

• Assigned a support provider in August

• Started teaching school on September 1st

• Received BTSA Orientation September and completed consent form (funding mechanism)

• Received a site orientation in August from SP

• Began BTSA professional development activities in October

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in May

• Attended Advice/Assistance meetings in

December, March, and June

• Began formative assessment with SP in September

Page 9: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in May and put into a district pool• Hired in May and put into a district pool

• Placed at a school in June

Teacher #1

• Assigned a support provider in August

• Started teaching school in September

• Received BTSA Orientation September

• Received a site orientation in August from SP

• Began Induction work in October

• Attended Advice & Assistance meetings in December, March, June

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in May

Projection for Teacher #1: On track to receive his clear credential in two years

Page 10: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in May and put into a district pool• Hired in May and put into a district pool

• Placed at a school in June

Teacher #1

• Assigned a support provider in August

• Started teaching school in September

• Received BTSA Orientation September

• Received a site orientation in August from SP

• Began Induction work in October

• Attended Advice & Assistance meetings in December, March, June

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in May

Impact on District:• Student Achievement• Teacher Quality• Teacher Retention• Funding

Page 11: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in late July by the school’s principal• Hired in late July by the school’s principal

Teacher #2

• Assigned a support provider October 1st

• Started teaching school on September 1st

• Received BTSA Orientation late October

• Received a site orientation in August from principal

• Began BTSA professional development activities in January

• Attended Advice & Assistance meeting in June

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in late May

• Completed consent form in October at BTSA Orientation (funding mechanism)

• Began formative assessment in October

Page 12: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in late July by the school’s prinicipal• Hired in late July by the school’s prinicipal

Teacher #2

• Assigned a support provider October 1st

• Started teaching school in September

• Received BTSA Orientation late October

• Received a site orientation in August from principal

• Began Induction work in January

• Attended Advice & Assistance meeting in June

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in late May

Projection for Teacher #2:Despite a later start, on track to receive her clear credential in two years.

Page 13: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in late July by the school’s prinicipal• Hired in late July by the school’s prinicipal

Teacher #2

• Assigned a support provider October 1st

• Started teaching school in September

• Received BTSA Orientation late October

• Received a site orientation in August from principal

• Began Induction work in January

• Attended Advice & Assistance meeting in June

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in late May

Impact on District:• Student Achievement• Teacher Quality• Teacher Retention• Funding

Page 14: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in late August by the school’s principal• Hired in late August by the school’s principal

Teacher #3

• Assigned a support provider January 31st

• Started teaching school in September

• Didn’t know BTSA Orientation occurred

• Never received a site orientation

• Attended some BTSA professional development activities

• Attended Advice & Assistance meeting in June to “see what Induction was all about”

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in May

• Completed consent form in late November

• Began formative assessment in February

Page 15: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in late August by the school’s principal• Hired in late August by the school’s principal

Teacher #3

• Assigned a support provider January 31st

• Started teaching school in September

• Didn’t know BTSA Orientation occurred

• Never received a site orientation

• Attended Induction workshops when convenient

• Attended Advice & Assistance meeting in June to “see what Induction was all

about”

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in May

Projection for Teacher #3:Highly unlikely he will complete his credential in two years; would require diligence and dedication

Page 16: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired in late August by the school’s principal• Hired in late August by the school’s principal

Teacher #3

• Assigned a support provider January 31st

• Started teaching school in September

• Didn’t know BTSA Orientation occurred

• Never received a site orientation

• Attended Induction workshops when convenient

• Attended Advice & Assistance meeting in June to “see what Induction was all

about”

• Met with program director for Portfolio Review in May

Impact on District:• Student Achievement• Teacher Quality• Teacher Retention• Funding

Page 17: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired sometime after school started• Hired sometime after school started

Teacher #4

• No support provider available at site so no formative assessment completed

• Started teaching three days later

• BTSA Orientation already occurred

• No one thought of a site orientation

• Came to BTSA professional development when she could

• Met at the program director’s insistence in July

• Signed consent form with HR personnel as part of her employment package papers

• Never attended an Advice and Assistance meeting so never understood need for documentation

Page 18: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired sometime after school started• Hired sometime after school started

Teacher #4

• No support provider available at site

• Started teaching three days later

• BTSA Orientation already occurred

• No one thought of a site orientation

• Came to BTSA activities when she could

• Never attended a Advice & Assistance

meeting so never understood need for documentation • Met at the program director’s insistence in July

Projection for Teacher #4:She doesn’t understand what is required or what she needs to do so at least one additional year will be needed, if not two.

Page 19: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

• Hired sometime after school started• Hired sometime after school started

Teacher #4

• No support provider available at site

• Started teaching three days later

• BTSA Orientation already occurred

• No one thought of a site orientation

• Came to BTSA activities when she could

• Never attended a Advice & Assistance

meeting so never understood need for documentation • Met at the program director’s insistence in July

Impact on District:• Student Achievement• Teacher Quality• Teacher Retention• Funding

Page 20: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts

Where could a site administrator have aided each participating teacher in his/her progression toward completion?

Where could a site administrator have aided each participating teacher in his/her progression toward completion?

Page 21: The Impact of Induction  on Local Districts