The Impact of Global economic crisis on Jordanian Workers’ … · 2015-10-26 · The Impact of...
Transcript of The Impact of Global economic crisis on Jordanian Workers’ … · 2015-10-26 · The Impact of...
The Impact of Global economic crisis on Jordanian
Workers’ Remittances
Dr. Ahmad ArefAssaf
(PhD in Economics)
Dean/ Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences
ZarqaUniversity ,Zarqa , Jordan
Office: +962 5 3821100 Ext. 1500
Mobile: +962 79 5330651
A paper presented to the 1st International Conference of Development and Economy- The
advantages and disadvantages of Economic Crises. Kalamata, Greece, 2 - 4 October 2015
This paper is funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research/ Zarqa University
2
Abstract
The main goal of the present study is to highlight the effectof global financial crisis occurred
in 2008–09 on Jordanian Workers’ Remittances. Using different methodology to measure the
economic impact of the decline in remittances inflows during the crisis in Jordan and other
Middle East countries, the author calculate the impact as the proportion of remittances to
GFP in 2008 times the growth rate of remittances inflows in 2009. The result shows that the
drop in remittances for Jordan resulted in a negative shock of (-0.93%) of GDP, (-1.36%) for
Lebanon, (-2.83%) for Egypt, and (-0.93%) for West Bank and Gaza. Thus, even there is
impact of economic crisis on remittances inflows, but such impact was modest in Jordan.
Key words: remittances, global finical crises, economic growth (GDP), Jordan
3
Background
The global financial crisis in 2008–09 served a harsh blow to 215 million migrants and their
families around the world. Migrants faced worsening employment prospects in destination
countries, often coupled with tightening entry regulations and vicious anti-immigration
rhetoric. Meanwhile, migrants’ support to families back home in the form of remittances was
ever more important in the face of the rising cost of living.
Remittances are the most tangible link between migration and development. At more than
$325 billion per year, remittances sent by migrants to developing countries are larger than
official development assistance as well as private debt and portfolio equity flows.
Remittances help families all over the world to pay for food, housing, education, and health
expenses and even invest in small businesses. At the national level, remittances help offset
current account deficits and shore up international reserves.
Jordan is classified as a lower middle income country (World Bank 2011) and it has shown
strong economic performance since 2000 with an annual GDP growth averaging 7.5 percent
and per capita GDP more than doubling. Due to the economic slowdown in 2008, and the
unstable situation in the region, Jordan is now meeting several challenges, including
vulnerability to fluctuations in the international oil market, high unemployment and
dependency on remittances from the Gulf States (World Bank 2011).
Jordan's economy is mainly dependent on exports, tourism, and overseas Jordanian
employees' remittances. Any imbalances in these economic resources will affect the rate of
employment and unemployment in the kingdom. Like some underdeveloped countries,
Jordan has been suffering greatly from "brain drain"; there are approximately 600,000
Jordanians working abroad, nearly 50 % of them have workplaces in the Gulf region, and
their remittances are up to 20% of the Jordanian GDP, (European Commission, 2009).In
other words, remittances are recognized as an important national income to the country. It is
agreed that, among the huge number of Jordanians working overseas, there are a big number
of academic, skilled and professional people. This undoubtedly, despite the advantageous
benefits, negatively affects the country since Jordan needs to make up the shortage by depend
on alterative foreign manpower from Egypt and Syria. Consequently, this leads to transfer
huge amounts of foreign currency outside the country; cash outflow. The point is that the
foreign laborers from the Arab neighboring countries are not as professional as the
Jordanians; the vast majority of them work in the field of construction.
The Jordanian economy has one of the world’s highest levels of remittances as a proportion
of GDP (23 percent in 2009) and remittances are a key source of income and foreign
exchange for Jordan. Table 1 shows the significance of remittances for Jordan. According to
the World Bank, for comparison, net FDI inflows were US$2.0 billion, net, ODA received
were US$0.7 billion, the total international reserves were US$8.9 billion, exports of goods
and services were US$12.4 billion in 2008. It is also worth noting that outward remittance
flows are very small in comparison to inward remittance flows despite Jordan appearing to be
a net immigration country.
4
Strong economic growth in the 1970s and 1980s was based almost entirely upon emigrants’
remittances. During 1999-2009, average annual GDP growth rate was 6.7% (The World Bank
(2011) and remittances averaged 23 percent of GDP. On the other hand, this economic
growth did not translate into job creation and vibrant labor market. Jordan has low rates of
labor market participation. In particular, female labor force participation has always been
pretty low at 16 percent in 2009 and 12 percent in 2008, whilst male labor force participation
was 84 percent in 2009 (Ministry of Labour 2009). Furthermore, Jordan suffers from
consistently high unemployment rates, 12.9 percent in 2009 according to the Ministry of
Labour (2009). Jordanian unemployment is a youth phenomenon both in terms of absolute
numbers and in terms of unemployment rates. Female unemployment rates are pretty high at
24.1 percent despite their low level of economic activity. It is also worth noting that
unemployment rates are the highest amongst the most educated at around 16 percent.
Objectives of the study
The study aimed to highlighted the global financial crisis in occurred in 2008–09 and its
impact on Jordanian Workers’ Remittances as the Jordanian economy has one of the world’s
highest levels of remittances as a proportion of GDP (23 percent in 2009) and remittances are
a key source of income and foreign exchange for Jordan.
Literature Review
Previous literature on remittances has to a large extent focused on the motives as
determinants of remittances and on the effects of remittances on poverty, inequality and
economic development (Docquier and Rapoport 2005, Russel 1986). Other studies have
investigated the impacts of saving in Pakistan (Burney 1987), or on consumption, investment
and imports (El-Sakka 2007, p 8). Some empirical evidence shows that remittances can
increase economic growth by functioning as a multiplier in gross national output. It also
shows that high proportions of employment can be supported by remittances (OECD 2006, p
155). Jadotte (2009, p 2) mentions a study by Lamaute-Brisson (2002) that shows that if
remittances are targeted to financing economic activities, they are likely to be distributed to
informal activities in the service sector with low productivity. Lamaute-Brisson (2003) has
also done a study about remittances in Haiti where she finds that even though remittances
allow some households to get away from poverty, they do not necessarily reduce inequality
as these transfers often are provided to the wealthier households. Acosta (2006) shows that
remittances decrease the liquidity restraints in El Salvador and therefore increase both
consumption and investments. But after controlling for household wealth and using selection
correction techniques, remittances are negatively correlated to child labor and adult female
labor supply. Average male labor participation is unaffected and an increase in girls‟
education level is increasing with remittances. Rodriguez and Tiongson (2001) find that the
migrant and non-migrant labor participation is not separable and that remittance has a
negative impact on labor supply but remittances are affecting men‟s, rather than women‟s
supply of labor. Kim 2006, Bussolo and Medvedev (2008) have shown that remittances
reduce the labor supply of mainly female, but sometimes also male workers. A study of the
5
effect of remittances on the Mexican household labor supply has been conducted by
Airola(2008), who finds that remittance is affecting the hours of work negatively, particularly
for women.
There are researchers who present different results. Funkhouser (1992) observes that, in
Nicaragua, remittances improve the entrepreneurial activities for men (even if reducing labor
supply for women). The result that Kim (2007, p 12-14) finds from a simple cross sectional
study is that remittance is negatively affecting labor market participation at the individual
level. The weekly hours worked by employed people, however, are not affected. The panel
data at the cluster level shows a negative impact of remittances on the labor force mainly
because people receiving remittances have higher reservation wages., A survey by Cox-
Edwards and Rodríguez-Oreggia (2008) on households in Mexico finds no differences in
labor participation between receiving and non-receiving households. For women in the urban
areas remittances increase labor participation and the possible explanation is that remittance
contributes to the establishment of family owned enterprises which could improve the labor
market opportunities for women.
Earlier research of remittances in Jordan shows that they are positively related to economic
growth (Chatelard 2010). Another study investigates how the macroeconomic policy in
Jordan affects the inflows of remittances (El-Sakka 2007). Other research regarding the
impacts of migration and the inflows of remittances on the Jordanian economy during the 70s
is done by Kirwan (1981) and he finds that the unemployment rate decreased because of the
emigration and through the increase of domestic demand for labor. He also finds that a period
of rapid growth was partly due to the high level of remittances. A study conducted by Ilahi
and Shendy shows that there exist spillover effects from the oil-rich countries to the regional
countries (among these Jordan). In other words, the growth in GDP in the Gulf States is
correlated with the neighboring countries which supply the additional labor’s received
remittances (Ilahi and Shendy 2008, p 5, 13). According to a study conducted by Sondos and
Kharmeh (2010) the impact of Jordanian workers‟ remittances on macroeconomic variables
was significant. The household’s final consumption expenditure increased by 33.6 percent
per year, the government final consumption increased by 35.1 percent yearly, the total
exports decreased by 39.5 percent per year and the gross capital formation increased by 31.4
percent, all due to remittances. Remittances contributed to increase in GDP by 7.1 percent.
The impact of the high rate of Jordanian workers‟ remittances on the households‟ final
consumption expenditure was due to a high ratio of marginal propensity to consume in
Jordan, which is estimated to be more than 90 percent (Sondos and Kharmeh 2010).
Emigration and the Labor Market in Jordan
The first wave of Jordan Labor Market Panel Survey (JLMPS 10), which collected micro-
level information in the period from December2009 to June 2010 shows that in 2010,2.1
percent of households had at least one member working overseas. However, it is important to
remember that this figure is an underestimate since it does not include migrant households
6
who are wholly currently overseas; i.e. does not include migrants with theirwhole families
currently overseas.
A substantial proportion, almost 38 percent of current migrants, has left in the last two years,
which is expected given the temporary nature of migration in particular to the Gulf States
which amounts for the majority of emigration from Jordan. Around 80 percent of migrants
have visited in the last two years. Jordanian emigrants are highly educated: 62 percent have
university degree highlighting the high skill nature of outward migration in Jordan. Currente
migrants are predominately urban— 95 percent of their households are located in urbanareas.
Interestingly, current migrants were mostly employed (94 percent) before migratingand 79
percent were working in the private sector.
Figure (1) shows the overseas destinations of current emigrants. More than half the current
Jordanian emigrants are in Saudi Arabia (32%) and the UAE (24%). Almost a quarter is in
Western Countries, with the U.S. being the main destination (9%).
By examining the jobs of current overseas emigrants, 91.8 percent were found to be waged
workers, 7.8 percent employers and the majority, 89 percent, was employed in the private
sector. In addition, Figure 2.1 presents the distribution of overseas occupations of current
migrants and indicates that over half of the current emigrants were engaged in skilled
occupations. In terms of economic activity, Jordanian emigrants tend to be engaged in
construction, wholesale and retail trade, professional and technical, and accommodation and
food sectors (Figure 2.2).
Figure (1) the overseas destinations of current Jordanian emigrants
7
Figure (2) Overseas Occupation and Economic Activity of Current Jordanian
Emigrants (%)
Remittances
In 1984 remittances accounted for one-fourth of Jordan’s GDP. In the end of 1980 the return
migration from the Gulf started and accelerated during the Gulf War. This return of migrants
increased the population of Jordan by ten percent and the fall in remittances accounted for ten
percent of GDP. In the mid-1990s the stability of the region increased and again, the
Jordanian skilled labor started to migrate to the Gulf States. As we can see in figure (3), the
flow of remittances to Jordan has increased the last 20 years and a plausible explanation for
that could be a decrease in the transfer cost for sending money back home, due to
technological improvements and more competition among financial institutions (Acosta
2006, p 11).
8
Figure (3)
The flow of remittances to Jordan
Source: Author’s calculation from World Bank Indicators (2015).
According to some estimates, if one takes the unofficial remittances into account, the actual
remittances should be about 60 percent higher (El-Sakka 2007, p 5). Remittances per-capita
in Jordan is also the highest among labor exporters in the Middle East (ibid. p 5). Jordanian
labor remittances are among the most important economic variables that contribute to the
growth of the national economy. It represents an important economic resource in the
Jordanian balance of payments, because of the high ratio of the total value of receipts that
reached 25 percent of the current balance of payments. The remittances contributed to more
than 40 percent of the balance of services, and more than 20 percent to GDP in the beginning
of the 21st century (Central Bank of Jordan, 2010). 250,000 Jordanians are working abroad
and the majority of them have relatively high educational qualifications like a university
degree. A large part of the senders are working in the Arabian Gulf States (Sondos and
Kharmeh 2010, p 122). Recent years have seen an improvement in relations between Jordan
and the Arab Gulf States, which has led to an increased demand for Jordanian labor, thus
increased remittances.
Since remittances received are a potential source of investments and are therefore able to
bring about concrete economic benefits, estimating their macroeconomic effects is an issue of
both economic and politic interest. The macroeconomic effects of remittances and especially
their economic growth potential have been under-researched in Jordan. Consequently, our
research objective is to investigate, through regression analysis using OLS, the contribution
of the remittances received in Jordan to its long-term economic growth.
Around 3.3 percent of Jordanian households or 4.9 percent of the Jordanian population have
received remittances from household members or other relatives overseas in 2010. Almost 69
percent of household receiving remittances were from migrants in Arab countries, and 31
9
percent were from Western Countries. Almost all household heads receiving remittances are
females and 92percent live in urban areas. More than half the remittances were sent to either
a spouse (25percent) or an offspring (33 percent). Figure4. Different methods are used to
send overseas remittances (Figure 5). Mail order is the most popular way (44 %) for current
migrants to send remittances to Jordan. Only 27 percent of current migrants send their
transfers through the banking system. Almost a third of households are sent remittances
through informal channels (by hand or through friends and relatives).
The average amount of remittances over the previous 12 months, was JD2, 054.759 (median=
JD1, 200). The mean amount of remittances sent by migrants in Western countries washigher
than that sent by Arab migrants (JD2,254 compared to JD1,663), but the median from
migrants to Arab countries was higher at JD1,200 relative to JD1,000 from migrants in
Western countries). Only 5 percent of household heads receiving overseas transfers we
recurrently employed, but this is mainly because those households are female headed and
more than 55 percent of those females are above 40 years of age. In fact examining labor
force participation, , there is evidence that individuals in households in receipt of remittances
are less likely to participate in the labor market suggesting that remittances might lead to
higher reservation wages. For example, the labor market participation rate of males above 24
years of age is 69 percent in households in receipt of remittances compared to 80 percent in
households not receiving remittances. For females, the participation rate is 14 percent for
those in households receiving remittances compared to 20 percent in non-recipient
households. Interestingly, there is no significant difference in the educational level of
individuals of both groups (Figure 6). Also, figure 6 shows that household receiving overseas
transfers were more likely to belong to the top two wealth quintiles (4 and 5).
Figure 4: Relationship between Remittance Receiver and Donor
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
25
33
14 15
9
4
Relationship between Remittance Receiver and Donor(%)
10
Figure 5: Method of Sending Overseas Remittances
Remittances inflows to some Middle East Countries during financial crisis
The Middle East region, similar to nearly every region of the developing countries, was not
immune from the global financial crisis. A first look at official data (figure6) on remittances
inflows to Jordan and some Middle East countries suggest that such inflows were severely
affected by the crisis. Inflows decline in Jordan (-5.2%), Egypt (17.8%) for example.
Figure 6: Remittances inflows as (%) of GDP
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Jordan
Lebanon
Eygept
West Bank & Gaza
11
Using different methodology to measure the economic impact of the decline in remittances
inflows during the crisis in Jordan and other Middle East countries, the author calculate the
impact as the proportion of remittances to GFP in 2008 times the growth rate of remittances
inflows in 2009. The result shows that the drop in remittances for Jordan resulted in a
negative shock of (-0.93%) of GDP, (-1.36%) for Lebanon, (-2.83%) for Egypt, and (-0.93%)
for West Bank and Gaza. Thus, even there is impact of economic crisis on remittances
inflows, but such impact was modest in Jordan.
12
References
Assaad, R. 2011. The structure and evolution of employment in Jordan. ERF mimeo.
Di Bartolomeo, T. Fakhoury, and D. Perrin. 2010. CARIM Migration Profile: Jordan.
European University Institute, Robert Schuman for Advanced Studies.
Fayq Al Akayleh (2011), Labor Migration, Workers’ Remittances and Economic
Activity: New Instrumental Variables for the Effect of Remittances, J SocSci, 28(3): 211-
224. Giuliano P, Ruiz-Arranz M (2005), Remittances, Financial Development, and
Growth, IMF Working Paper 05/234.
HarshaParanavithana (2014), Do Workers’ Remittances Cushion Economic Growth in Sri
Lanka?, International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5, No. 10(1).
IMF, World Economic Outlook 2005, International Monetary Fund.; Washington D.C.
JasminkaSohinger, (2005), Growth and convergence in the European transition
economies: The impact of foreign direct investment, Eastern European Economics, Vol.
43, No.2, pp 73–94.
Khalid Al Khathlan (2012), the Link between Remittances and Economic Growth in
Pakistan: A Boon to Economic Stability, British Journal of Economics, Management &
Trade 2(3): 167-185
Krichel T and Levine P (2002), ―The Economic Impact of Labor Mobility in an Enlarged
European Union‖, University of Surrey.
Labor.
MdShoaib Ahmed (2010), Migrant Workers Remittance and Economic Growth: Evidence
from Bangladesh, ASA University Review, Vol. 4 No. 1.
Mohammad Salahuddin and Jeff Gow (2015), the relationship between economic growth
and remittances in the presence of cross- sectional dependence, the Journal of developing
arias, Volume 49 No. 1.
Mortensen Dale T (2004), ―Growth, Unemployment, and Labour Market Policy‖,
Northwestern University.
Pissarides Christopher (2000), ―Labor Markets and Economic Growth in the MENA
Region‖, London School of Economics.Planning unit. Jordan: The Ministry of Labor.
Pradhan, G., Upadhyay, M., &Upadhyaya, K. (2008). Remittances and economic growth
in developing countries. The European journal of development research, 20(3), 497-506.
Ramesh Chandra Paudel and Nelson Perera (2009), Foreign Debt, Trade Openness, Labor
Force and Economic Growth: Evidence from Sri Lanka The IUP Journal of Applied
Economics, Vol. VIII, No. 1.
Saif I. and T, El-Rayyes. . 2010. Labor Markets Performance and Migration Flows in
Jordan.In Labor market performance and migration flows in Arab Mediterranean
13
Countries:Determinants and Effects, European Economy, European Commission
Occasional Paper60, Volume III, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial
Affairs, EC.
SebilOlalekanOshota,AbdulazeezAdeniyiBadejo (2014), The Impact of Remittances on
Economic Growth in Nigeria: an Error Correction Modeling Approach, Zagreb
International Review of Economics & Business, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 21-43.
Syed TehseenJawaid, Syed Ali Raza (2012), Workers’ remittances and economic growth
in China and Korea: an empirical analysis, Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign
Trade Studies Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 185-193.
The Ministry of Labor. 2009. Jordanian Labor market in figures 2009. Jordan: Ministry of
The Ministry of Labor. 2010. Study on the Jordanian labor market, policies and strategic
The World Bank. 2011. The migration and remittances factbook 2011. Washington DC:
The World Bank.
World Bank (2011) ―Country Brief‖.
World Bank, Global Economic Prospects (2006), Economic Implications of Remittances
and Migration, World Bank; Washington D.C.