The Impact of Corporate Governance, Fundamental and ...

x

The Impact of Corporate Governance, Fundamental and Macroeconomic

Factors on Stock Prices: An Evidence from Sugar and Allied Industry of

Pakistan

BY

Rao Akmal Ali

Roll No.Phd-14-22

PhD in Social Sciences

SUPERVISED BY

Dr. Muhammad Irfan

Assistant Professor

IBF, BZU, Multan

Institute of Social and Cultural Studies Faculty of Social Sciences

Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan – Pakistan

2014

xi

Table of Contents

List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................................... xiv

List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................ xv

Abbrevations .......................................................................................................................................................... xvi

Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Chapter No 1 ............................................................................................................................................................. 2

Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 2

1.0 Introduction of the study ........................................................................................................................... 2

1.1 Background of the Study .......................................................................................................................... 2

1.2 Problem Statement .................................................................................................................................. 10

1.3 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................. 10

1.4 Research Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 11

1.5 Scope of the Study .................................................................................................................................. 11

1.6 Road Map of Thesis ................................................................................................................................ 11

Chapter No 2 ........................................................................................................................................................... 12

Literature Review.................................................................................................................................................... 12

2.0 Literature review. .......................................................................................................................................... 12

2.1 Agency Theory: ...................................................................................................................................... 12

2.2 Stock Price .............................................................................................................................................. 25

2.3 Corporate Governance: ........................................................................................................................... 33

2.4 CEO Duality: .......................................................................................................................................... 37

2.5 Ownership Concentration ....................................................................................................................... 39

2.6 Oil Prices ................................................................................................................................................. 46

2.7 GDP ........................................................................................................................................................ 47

2.8 Inflation ................................................................................................................................................... 49

2.9 Size of a Firm .......................................................................................................................................... 50

2.10 Profitability ............................................................................................................................................. 51

2.11 Relationship between Variables .............................................................................................................. 52

2.12.1 Stock Price ...................................................................................................................................... 52

2.12.2 Relationship of CEO Duality with Stock Price ............................................................................... 52

2.12.3. Relationship of Ownership Concentration with a Stock Price ............................................................... 53

2.12.4 Leverage and Stock Price:............................................................................................................... 56

2.12.5 Relationship of Leverage with Stock Price ..................................................................................... 59

2.12.6 Relationship of Oil Prices with Stock Price .................................................................................... 60

xii

2.12.7 Relationship of GDP with Stock Price ............................................................................................ 63

2.12.8 Relationship of Inflation with Stock Price ...................................................................................... 65

2.12.9 Relationship of Firm Size with Stock Price .................................................................................... 67

2.12.10 Relationship of Profitability with Stock Price ................................................................................ 68

2.13 Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................................................... 70

2.14 Hypothesis Development ............................................................................................................................ 71

2.14.1 Evidences about Hypothesis Development ............................................................................................. 71

2.14.2 CEO Duality and Stock Price .................................................................................................................. 71

2.14.3 Ownership Concentration and Stock Price ............................................................................................. 72

2.14.4 Oil Price and Stock Price ........................................................................................................................ 72

2.14.5 Inflation & stock price ............................................................................................................................ 73

2.14.6 GDP and Stock Price............................................................................................................................... 74

2.14.7 Leverage and Stock Price ........................................................................................................................ 74

2.14.8 Firm Size and Stock Price ....................................................................................................................... 75

2.14.9 Profitability and Stock Price ................................................................................................................... 75

Chapter No. 3 .......................................................................................................................................................... 77

Research Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 77

3.1 Research Methodology and Research Design ......................................................................................... 77

3.1 .1 Type of study ........................................................................................................................................... 77

3.1.2 Population ....................................................................................................................................... 77

3.1.3 Sample and Data collection............................................................................................................. 77

3.2 Operational Definitions and Measurement of Variables. ........................................................................ 78

3.2.2 Stock Price. ..................................................................................................................................... 78

3.2.3 CEO Duality .................................................................................................................................... 78

3.2.4 Ownership concentration ................................................................................................................ 78

3.2.5 Leverage .......................................................................................................................................... 78

3.2.6 Oil Prices ......................................................................................................................................... 78

3.2.7 GDP................................................................................................................................................. 79

3.2.8 Inflation ........................................................................................................................................... 79

3.2.9 Firm size.......................................................................................................................................... 79

3.2.10 Profitability ..................................................................................................................................... 80

3.3 Specifications of the Econometric Model ............................................................................................... 81

Chapter No 4 ........................................................................................................................................................... 83

Results and Discussions .......................................................................................................................................... 83

4.1 Sample and Data Collection .................................................................................................................... 83

xiii

4.2 Descriptions of the sample ...................................................................................................................... 85

4.3 Regression Assumptions ......................................................................................................................... 86

4.3.1 Multi-collinearity ............................................................................................................................ 86

4.4 Panel Regression Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 88

4.4.1 Model Specification .................................................................................................................................. 88

4.4.2 Corporate governance Model. .......................................................................................................................... 88

4.4.3 Economic attributes Model. ......................................................................................................................... 88

4.5 Hypothesis Testing .................................................................................................................................. 88

4.6 Hausman Fixed/Random Effect Specification Test ...................................................................................... 89

4.7 Autocorrelation ............................................................................................................................................ 90

4.8 Corporate governance and stock price. ........................................................................................................ 91

4.8.1 Hypothesis 1 - CEO duality and stock Price ............................................................................................. 91

4.8.2 Hypothesis 2 - Ownership concentration and stock price ......................................................................... 91

4.9 Economic indicators. ............................................................................................................................... 92

4.9.1 Hypothesis 3 - Oil price and stock Price. ........................................................................................ 92

4.9.3 Hypothesis 5 - inflation and stock Price ......................................................................................... 92

4.10 Control variables. .................................................................................................................................... 92

4.10.1 Hypothesis 6 - Leverage and Stock Price ....................................................................................... 92

4.10.2 Hypothesis 7 - Firm size and stock Price ........................................................................................ 92

4.10.3 Hypothesis 8 - Profitability and stock Price .................................................................................... 93

Chapter No 5 ........................................................................................................................................................... 94

Conclusion and Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 94

5.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 94

5.1 Overview of the Study ............................................................................................................................ 94

5.2 Discussion of Hypotheses ....................................................................................................................... 95

5.2.1 CEO duality and stock Price. .......................................................................................................... 95

5.2.2 Ownership concentration and stock price ....................................................................................... 95

5.2.3 Leverage and stock Price ................................................................................................................ 96

5.2.4 Price of the oil and stock Price. ....................................................................................................... 97

5.2.5 GDP and stock Price ....................................................................................................................... 98

5.2.6 Inflation and stock Price ................................................................................................................. 98

5.2.7 Firm size and stock Price .............................................................................................................. 100

5.2.8 Profitability and stock Price .......................................................................................................... 101

5.3 Implications of the study ....................................................................................................................... 102

5.3.1 Implications to Theory .................................................................................................................. 102

xiv

5.3.2 Implications to the Regulatory Authorities and Policy Makers .................................................... 103

5.3.3 Implications for Financial Statements Users................................................................................. 103

5.3.4 Implications to the Researchers .................................................................................................... 104

5.4 Limitations of this Study ....................................................................................................................... 104

5.5 Suggestions for Future Research........................................................................................................... 105

References ............................................................................................................................................................. 106

Appendix A ........................................................................................................................................................... 118

xv

List of Tables

Table Description Page No

3.1 Table of the variables and their measurement 79

4.1 Descriptions of the sample collection of the firms 83

4.2 Descriptive of Sample with mean, maximum and minimum value 84

4.3 Correlation matrix of the sample 86

4.4 (A) Results of Random Effect for Corporate governance model 88

4.4 (B) Results of Random Effect for Microeconomic model 88

4.5 (A) Hausman specification test results for Corporate governance

model

89

4.5 (B) Hausman specification test results for Economic attributes model 89

4.6 Autocorrelation Test for Models 90

xvi

List of Figures

Figure Description Page No

3.1 Diagram of the conceptual framework 69

xvii

Abbreviations

Abbreviations Detail

CG Corporate Governance

FS Firms size

CEO Chief executive Officer

GDP Gross domestic product

TD Total debt burden

INF Inflation

SP Stock price

These are the abbreviation used in my research study.

1

Abstract

The main objective of study is to explore the relationship Corporate governances' attributes,

economic attributes and stock price. To test this relation, I developed the hypothesis related to

corporate governance, economic attributes and stock prices. To test these hypotheses, I use the data

of PSE listed all sugar and allied industries from 2006-2015. I used panel data method to analyze the

data after fulfilling the assumption of the regression. Relationship between the impacts of corporate

governance attributes, economic attributes with stock price is carried out with its impact on sugar and

allied industries in Pakistan.

The results of study shows that there is a positive relationship between CEO duality and stock prices.

It means that if the CEO and Chairman of the board have both positions that increase the stock price

and have a positive relationship between both variables. Ownership concentration (OCN) has no

significant relationship with the stock price. The price of the oil has a noteworthy and negative

association with stock prices. It implies that when the price of the oil expanded at that point stock

price decline. There is not a critical relationship between GDP and stock price. It implies that GDP in

Pakistan does not affect the stock prices of the organizations. The CEO duality has a positive

relationship between monetary development and stock market prices. There is an association between

firm size and stock prices. It means that profitability has no impact on stock prices. There is a

negative connection between inflation and stock prices. My study has various important implications

that relate to theory, regulatory authority, policymakers, users of the financial information, Academia,

and the researchers.

Keywords. Ownership concentration, CEO duality, Inflation, GDP, Sugar and allied sector, PSE

2

Chapter No 1

Introduction

1.0 Introduction of the study

The first chapter includes the introductions of the study with the strong background and the problem

statement. In this chapter 1 explore my objectives and the research questions. At the end of the chapter I

conclude the significance of the study.

1.1 Background of the Study

Stock Price represents capital formation and rising economic growth. Savers and users of

capital by fund pooling, risk-sharing, and transferring are facilitated by Trading of securities.

Investment flows towards productive projects boost the economy. Share prices support decision

making by Investors. Changes in share prices and changes in fundamental financial variables have

a healthy relationship. Daily basis fluctuations in Stock prices can be observed. Variation in stock

prices of individual stocks happens after a regular interval of time. I can say that stock prices are

determined based on demand and supply. You cannot predict an actual change in stock prices. But

on the basis fundamental and macroeconomic factors that can bring some probabilities.

Investors analyses firms by observing stock prices. Calculating a firm’s value is the primary task

for the analyst of the stock price, hired by most of the firms because the firm value, has played a

significant role for investors.

Fundamental and specialized investigation is strategies for examining stock prices. While

clarifies that the theoretical research is an examination of the estimation of a stock (Siregar et al.

2004), which incorporates the investigation of the organization’s circumstance, industry

investigation, an analysis of the national economy and universal financial examination, while a

specialized exam is the examination of the development. of the stock price, in light of valid price

developments in the past of the stock (Siregar et al. 2004)

(Er et al. 2012) observationally test the Arbitrage Pricing Theory at the Istanbul Stock

Exchange (ISE) for the time of Feb,2001-Sep,2005. In its investigation it utilizes 13

macroeconomic factors, speaks to the essential economy, for example, cash supply, modern

creation, unrefined petroleum price, buyer price record, import, send out, gold price, swapping

scale, loan fee, total national output, foreign trade saves. Joblessness rate and market pressure

record in the various modern arrangements of the Istanbul Stock Exchange to watch the impacts of

these factors on stock returns. They find that while there are very minor contrasts between

showcase portfolios, all elements are significant in clarifying stock returns (Er et al. 2012).

President duality, possession concentration, price, foreign cash trade, residential and

3

universal oil prices, total national output (GDP), loan fees, cash supply, exchange adjusts, nation

saves, outside direct ventures, and so on. The Pakistani record is factor, can mutilate the stock

price. The most significant monetary and essential elements that can influence creating nations,

including Pakistan are CEO duality, influence, benefit, Owner concentration, expansion, oil prices,

GDP, and firm size. Various investigations uncover the relationship of these factors to the stock

market record. This exploration was concentrating on observing the effect of these factors,

particularly on the Pakistan Sugar industry.

National pay and yield estimations for a given nation's economy, total national output

(GDP) is equivalent to the full use of every single last great and administration delivered, inside the

country inside the predefined period.

Oil has incredible significance in the present world economy. The across-the-board

utilization of this has expanded reliance on this item in the stock interest balance. Therefore, oil has

increased a key position separated from other vitality syces on the planet. Expanding oil prices was

build generation costs when there is no plausibility of substitution among creation factors; higher

creation costs was influence income and stock prices. Simultaneously increasing oil prices was

change the pace of diminishing in evaluating pattern model. Because of the inflationary might

made by rising oil prices, the national bank may expand loan fees to control price. Higher financing

costs was prompt inclination for interest bearing Instruments to stocks. This difference in the

decision was make stock prices drop. The full impact of rising oil prices on stock prices was

change contingent upon whether the firm is a buyer or maker of oil or oil-based commodities (Li et

al. 2010).

Influence is the piece of the expenses to ensure dangers, Operational control was be gotten

from operational hazard and was point, to lasting costs in both benefit and misfortune

circumstances. This influence alludes to the products of the organization that need perpetual and

persistent money related help, intend to build the exhibition of typical investors: the more

significant this influence, the more noteworthy the danger of the organization.

The principal task confronting budgetary investigators and speculators is to see, how the stock

prices of individual firms move with the changing states of a division, even more for the most part

the general economy. The stock prices of less productive firms were be more touchy to regular

stuns than the costs of progressively beneficial firms and demonstrating a different connection

between the company's relative benefit, price affectability to industry and market data.

4

The stock market assumes an urgent job in financial development with the buy and offer of

protections, shares and new stock ventures. There is chance sharing and raising money in this

market that encages capital clients in protections exchanging exchanges. In stock prices,

speculators find support in putting rescues into specific portions of the organization. Speculations

state there is a connection between changes in stock prices and money related vital factors.

Changes in stock prices can be watched every day. It is anything but difficult to see that a few

organizations acknowledge stock prices distinctive time in a day. This implies organic market

powers set stock prices at various interims of time. Any moronic framework can't dictate the

specific development of costs, yet there are a few factors that decide the market interest of a

particular stock. These are the principle factors, specific factors, and market feel.

The capital market offers created and creating economies a stage, for monetary

intermediation. The principal motivation behind the stock market is to draw in potential

speculators, to contribute by providing attractive venture chances to extend the business volume of

the general public. The stock market record goes about as a mirror in the presentation of portfolios

to guarantee extended haul capital responsibilities (Elumilade et al. 2006). Investors have positive

income past their ventures. However, the issue is that market execution cannot generally be at the

top. There is an equivalent possibility of addition or misfortune because of market factors (hazard

factors). The conduct of the hazard factor difficulties the requirement for portfolio and stock

valuation models to make safe ventures to keep financial specialists in contact with the capital

market. (Elumilade et al. 2006) In request to gauge the estimation of macroeconomic components

to evaluate the arrival of Nigerian resource in the period 2000-2013, net outside resource, swapping

scale, non-administrative associations distributed month to month information using a loan and

cash supply. Standard model expanded Dicky fuller test, Engle and Granger co-reconciliation

procedures ire utilized in the understanding of information in drawing the discoveries. Credits to

non-legislative associations have a constructive outcome, and the conversion standard negatively

affects Nigeria returns. The overall results are essential in that administrative specialists and

financial specialists accommodate their portfolios. As indicated by (Fazli et al. 2014) that the

exchange valuing model was endorsed in the money related market in 1997-2007. To examine the

capability of advantage valuing hypothesis, creators consider macroeconomic forces, and there has

been less change in financing costs parts in the mechanical generation cash supply, oil prices, and

price.

(Kurawa et al. 2014) chose ten Nigerian firms through stratified examining, to represent their

arrival on resource with the assistance of specific components; conversion scale, price, net national

5

pay, and loan cost. In this examination, the Pearson Motion Correlation test was utilized to

comprehend the relationship between the return on resource. Discoveries demonstrated the

inadequacy of famed factors in Nigerian stocks. As per (Kurawa et al. 2014)) that the

accompanying macroeconomic factor, the connection between Saudi Arabia S&P 500 list and the

exchange hypothesis was be gotten a handle on in the time of 1994-2013 with the assistance of

month to month information by oil price, CPI, conversion standard, cash supply, and modern

creation. The vector mistake adjustment model is utilized to clarify the idea of factors in the past

investigation. The discoveries indicated that all the chose factors significantly affected Saudi stock

prices; however, the S&P 500 record couldn't gauge stock market prices. (Ouma et al. 2014) Tested

the significance of benefit estimating speculations in the Kenyan money related market by altering

month to month information for the period 2003-2013.

(Samontaray et al. 2014) In their examination in 2003-2013, they explored the reaction of

macroeconomic elements to assess the profits of the Saudi Arabian capital market. Relapse

investigation and Pearson relationship ire utilized to decipher PE proportion, oil WTI and month to

month trade information. With the assistance of SPSS. PE proportion demonstrated preferable

outcomes over different factors of the examination. (Zaighum 2014) researched the impact of

macroeconomic factors; sans risk rate, advertise return, cash supply, expansion (CPI) and

mechanical creation index11 in 115 non-budgetary firms exchanged on the Karachi Stock

Exchange in 2001-2011. The unit root test was picked by (Garratt et al. 2003) to scrutinize the

solidness of the factors and panel data method ire applied to assess the information.

The factors of the investigation assumed a significant job in clarifying stock returns, cash

supply assumed a stable role in the examination of stock returns in price, and market returns

demonstrated low potential. (Addo et al. 2013) In the period 1995-2011, Ghana attempted to assess

monetary market returns utilizing the valuation model.

(Han et al. 2018) watched the dynamic effect of macroeconomic factors on stocks exchanged on 37

BSE trades somewhere in the range of 2000 and 2005; many of them are financial exchange loan

cost, cash supply, and GDP proportion. With the assistance of SPSS 12.0 and EViews 5.1, two-

followed p esteems ire utilized with the T-test. The discoveries uncovered the insufficiency of APT

to assess the stock returns of the UHI. During the 2001-2010 period, I led an examination on the

UHI 100 list to discover the dynamic effect of macroeconomic factors on showcase returns.

Pearson connection with SPSS, relapse examination, and coefficient relationship indicated massive

aftereffects of the investigation. (Jain and Waghmare, 2013) In the time of 2001-2012, India put

forth an attempt to survey the stock and bullion advertise returns as per macroeconomic variables

6

12. Strategies ire utilized to acknowledge the differences of the chose factors and organizations ire

selected with the proper inspecting procedure. The information assortment stage comprises of two

resources: essential (using overview) and optional (through past examinations). High loan fees, low

cash supply, swapping scale and common conditions have a frail association with the reliant

variable, and high cash supply, low financing cost, and both high and low price emphatically

influenced the Indian stock market markets. (Mishra et al. 2019)) assessed mechanical creation,

financing cost, oil value, conversion standard, and cash supply as a macroeconomic part to explore

the dynamic consequences for stock trade organizations in the UHI 100 list. Discoveries show that

trade rates, modern creation, and oil costs are less appealing, and financing costs and cash supply

are progressively appropriate for return estimation, as in a given working period. (Sireesha and

Research 2013) Measures Indian resource, silver and gold come back with the help of exchange

estimating hypothesis in the period 1993-2012. Exchange hypothesis incorporates outside factors

(household and remote institutional financial specialists, JPY-INR, USD-INR, EUR-INR, and

GBP-INR trade rates) and local factors (cash supply, CPI, mechanical creation list and GDP). The

outcomes indicated the feeble capability of the exchange hypothesis on Indian stocks. (Al-

Abedallat and Al-Shabib 2012) inspected the conduct of macroeconomic elements; Amman stock

market advertises GDP and returns estimate interests in the period 1990-2009. Numerous relapses

ire familiar with information preparation, and the outcomes demonstrated a straight connection

between needy and autonomous components. Also, changes in speculations shod preferable

illustrative control over changes in GDP while investigating Amman's capital market in a given

period. (Brown and Abraham 2012) picked three macroeconomic elements; Error remedy model to

consider the profits of the advantages of the Nigerian economy in conversion standard, expansion,

and intrigue. The outcomes show that there is a substantial negative connection between the base

rebate rate and the capital market, which demonstrates that the short lessening in the base

markdown rate builds the effectiveness of the advantage showcase.

The summarized Autoregressive Conditional Variance (GARCH) approach was applied to

grasp the impact of macroeconomic factors on asset returns. Disclosures exhibited that growth rate,

gold expense, and swapping scale influenced stock returns. (Tandon et al. 2013) In the period

2006-2010, India found an immaterial association between return on assets and macroeconomic

parts. Understanding the concordance of picked factors and making assumptions about research;

various backslide, and relationship examination was applied and scatter traces ire haggard.

(Yahyazadehfar and Babaie 2012) Three macroeconomic parts (house estimation, gold expense,

and advance charge) ire considered to evaluate the benefits on assets recorded in Iran during March

7

2001 - April 2011. factors. Johansen co-coordination and Vector auto backslide frameworks ire

used to control the pair of macroeconomic factors to check assets promote returns. The appearance

of the Tehran asset grandstand simply exhibited the hotel cost. (Asaolu and Ogunmuyiwa

2011)During the coordination and direction of Nigeria's ordinary stock worth, it broke down yearly

data, picked factors (theory, cash related insufficiency, present-day creation, outside commitment,

swapping scale, extension, and foreign capital inflow). The period of 1986-2007. Quantifiable

strategies: Greater causality in the comprehension of the database, Increased Dicky-stout was

applied. The proposed components can't be a fantastic marker of the Nigerian economy.

((Abdullahi et al. 2011)) The Bank used a forward method to manage grasp Nigerian stock returns

in 2000-2004 with the support of variables (expanding, transformation scale). In the assessment,

the connection between the elements and results was gotten using panel data method backslide and

Durbin-Watson test. The revelations sorted out the impact of different factors including

macroeconomic factors on Nigerian benefit for assets. (Singh et al. 2011) examined the appearance

of the advantages of the Taiwan capital market (TCM) with the help of macroeconomic elements.

Direct backslide was applied to achieve the perfect results, business rate and money supply, which

ire less typical like this estimation, and the swapping scale and GDP yielded possible results for

with or without associations from little and medium-sized undertakings. Simply expanding impacts

the small association's portfolio. General disclosures hugely impact associations and money related

to masters.

The revelations show that extension altogether influences the improvement of the transformation

scale, GDP and asset returns, similarly as the negative impact of the 3-month treasury bill and

money supply. (Zubairi and Farooq 2011) In solicitation to survey the feasibility of trade esteeming

speculation and capital asset evaluating the model in the 2004-2009 period, Karachi Stock

Exchange has 17 stock exchange associations from the excrement, oil, and gas sections. Market

return, GDP changes, transformation scale, and expansion are considered as macroeconomic parts

of the examination. Durbin Watson test, t-estimations, and f-bits of knowledge ire used to

coordinate the data. The results demonstrated the inadequacy of both assets assessing models to

figure stock returns. (Ahmet, measure the stock returns of the Istanbul stock exchange by sifting

through the month-to-month variable data; gold worth, money stock, oil esteem, CPI,

transformation scale, mechanical creation rundown and financing cost. The Multivariate backslide

model was applied to a month-to-month data for the period 2003-2010, and the revelations showed

that the change scale, present-day age record, credit charge, and oil cost altogether influenced asset

returns and various elements. insufficient. (Sharma et al. 2010) Classified the without fail data of

8

factors, which are instabilities in outside exchange, growing, remote exchange stores and gold costs

2008-2009 to layout returns of the Bombay cash related market. The results show that exchange

rates and gold expenses are in a high repeat relationship with the benefits of the Bombay stock

exchange (BSE), while remote exchange stores and growth rates do not have the mind-blowing

potential for BS Returns.

The protections trade record is affected by the various principal and macroeconomic

elements, for instance, extension, GDP, oil costs, money supply, credit expenses, trade changes,

impact, firm size, capital structure, and efficiency. The most vast and critical monetary and

underlying factors that can impact making countries, including Pakistan, are growing, oil costs,

total national yield, impact, profit, and firm size. Different assessments portray the association

between these components and the monetary trade, yet this investigation was focus on checking the

outcome of these variables, particularly on the Pakistan Sugar and Allied industry.

Price in macroeconomic factors is thought to influence the whole economy, and consequently,

organizations working in this condition. The costs of products and ventures rise in the marketplace

because of the expansion famous for merchandise and enterprises that surpass the cash supply. It

influences the obtaining influence of the individuals of the nation, and individuals have fair reserve

funds, bringing about expanded cash supply. Financial reserve funds are low as reserve funds are

less, which limits speculation. Price in the economy is estimated by the Consumer Price Index,

where the costs of merchandise and enterprises are sighted comparative with the sighted normal.

GDP is significant for the economy and financial development. GDP ascertains all

consumptions everything being equal and administrations in one fiscal year. Total national output

(GDP) quantifies the creation of a nation delivered in a country in the fiscal year.

Oil is additionally return as a significant variable in an economy. It is broadly utilized, and

in the stock interest balance, reliance on this item has expanded and along these lines has a position

used in oil essential leadership forms. On the off chance that oil costs was build, creation costs

were increment if there is not a viable replacement for oil-based goods. In a nation, the national

bank can raise loan fees to control expansion. Expanding loan costs was, in general, buy treasury

bills and bonds. Because of this change, stock costs were diminish. On the off chance that the firm

delivers or oil-based goods, the effect of oil costs was rely upon the association's generation, where

rising oil costs was influence the firm.

Influence is the proportion of all-out obligations to the association's total value. There are

9

two essential clarifications to clarify the influence impact. The primary explanation shows the

connection between unpredictability and anticipated return, which expands instability and

diminishes returns and returns in stock costs, which is a negative relationship amongst

unpredictability and stock returns. The subsequent clarification expresses that influence and stock

costs have a negative relationship with influence development if stock costs fall. Studies give

blended outcomes about the impact of influence on stock costs. Although these investigations face

a lot of troubles, they give blended outcomes. It is hard to accomplish an influencing impact on

unpredictability utilizing the estimation of market obligation. (Aydemir et al. 2007). (Aydemir et

al. 2007) also clarified that little size protections yield more significant yields and attract this to an

extra hazard factor. This is known as the size impact. In the American market, numerous

investigations have indicated that the dimensional impact has a round structure, however, others

have detailed the counter wonder (Reinganum 1999) contended that the foreknowledge impact

expectation is conceivable, and those huge organizations perform ill in the financial emergency.

At the point when the firm size and money related position are mulled over and endorsed (L'Her et

al. 2002), it implies firm size is significant. The value of the company depends upon its sales

volume, and its ability to profit from its sales. The company, which makes a high profit from its

assets, can use its profit to meet its needs and is less dependent on debt after deducting its debt

expenses. The increase in the debt ratio increases the value of the company and the debts can

increase the value of the company if the following assumptions are met.

• Reduce cost mediation in securities trading.

• Individual income is tax-exempt.

• Individuals or companies can borrow at a single interest rate.

• The company and shareholders' management may use the information in vain to

invest in the future.

Management efficiency can, therefore, be recognized by the company's profitability, in

which investors demand for shares increase the market value.

Thus, this study fills this gap by adding a more comprehensive set of macroeconomic

variables, as ill as crucial factors in the model, to investigate their relationship with stock prices.

This research is unique; the effect of these combinations of variable casting on stock prices has not

been explored as a framework focused mainly in the context of Pakistan. It was be useful for all the

stake holders of sugar and Allied industry of Pakistan in decision making regarding the factors

effecting the stock valuation. According to the economic perspective, it is also helpful to improve

10

the economy and stock market index. The impact of primary and stock market variables on return

on equity in Pakistan was examined by (Sarwar et al. 2013)). Essential and technical variables

related to stock prices in Indonesia ire considered by (Firmansyah et al. 2017). The effect of factors

on stock returns on the Istanbul Stock Exchange was examined by (Er et al. 2012).

1.2 Problem Statement

This study is aimed to determine the relation between different fundamental and

macroeconomic factors with stock prices in the Sugar and Allied industry of Pakistan. To know the

relationship between economic and theoretical considerations with stock prices, many factors

should be kept in mind like oil prices, inflation, GDP rate, leverage, firm size, and profitability. By

investigating this problem statement, this study fills this gap by adding a more comprehensive set

of macroeconomic variables, as ill as crucial factors in the model, to investigate their relationship

with stock prices. This research is unique; the effect of these combinations of variable casting on

stock prices has not been explored as a framework focused mainly on the context of Pakistan. It

was be useful for all the stake holders of sugar and Allied industry of Pakistan in decision making

regarding the factors effecting the stock valuation. According to the economic perspective, it is also

helpful to improve the economy and stock market index. The impact of primary and stock market

variables on return on equity in Pakistan was examined by (Sarwar et al. 2013). Essential and

technical variables related to stock prices in Indonesia ire considered by (Firmansyah et al. 2017).

The effect of factors on stock returns on the Istanbul Stock Exchange was examined by (Er et al.

2012).

1.3 Research Questions

By keeping in mind, the current study was answering the following given questions,

• Is there an effect of CEO Duality on stock price?

• Is there an effect of Ownership concentration on stock price?

• Is there an effect of the Leverage on the Stock Prices?

• Is there an effect of oil prices on stock price?

• Is there an effect of GDP on stock price?

• Is there an effect of the inflation on firm stock price?

• Is there an effect of firm size on firm stock price?

• Is there an impact of profitability on firm stock price?

11

1.4 Research Objectives

In solving the research problem, the researcher was guided by the following objectives:

• To see how the CEO duality has an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how the ownership concentration has an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how the Leverage has an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how the Oil prices have an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how the GDP has an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how inflation has an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how the Firm size has an impact on the Stock Prices.

• To see how the profitability has an impact on the Stock Prices.

1.5 Scope of the Study

My study covers the linkage of the stock price with GDP, oil price, Inflation, leverage, firm

size, and profitability. It is a cross-sectional data, and data was be collected in different time

frames. The sample population particular for this study is limited to Sugar and Allied industry

listed at PSX. For better insight, the whole community was be chosen. In this study, the impact of

macroeconomic variables was be studied on stock price as ill as the effect of fundamental variables

was also be examined.

1.6 Road Map of Thesis

My study consists of five chapters, that briefly described as follows. In Chapter No 1, I add

the introduction and background of the study. In the Background of the study, I covered all aspects

of the variables in brief with a previous study view, and I discussed the research gap, research

questions, and research object. Chapter 2 includes the theory that supports my study and relations

of the variables with each other. Literature in the current review, namely inflation, GDP, oil price,

leverage, firm size, profitability, and stock price also includes in detail in this chapter. In this

section the briefed explanation of Pakistan Stock Exchange is also included. Chapter No 3 has

describes the complete methodology of the study. In chapter 3, I discussed the processor of the data

collection and sample size; the Model of the study also included in the chapter with the hypothesis.

In Chapter 4, sample collection processor with descriptive, data analysis methods used, and

measurement of models in mathematical form and ready for the analysis, together with summary of

hypothesis testing, measurement model and path analysis are presented and also includes the

descriptive statistics and different assumptions of the panel data method that should be fulfilled

before the regression analysis. Chapter No 5 contains the conclusions and recommendations. In this

section relation with the theory and practical implementations also discussed. Limitations & future.

12

Chapter No 2

Literature Review

2.0 Literature review.

The literature assessment is the assessment articulation of the explores that are identified

with the field picked by the scientists in the literature. Literature assessment characterizes, gets

ready, surveys and elucidates literature (Boote and Beile 2005) It gives a hypothetical premise to

directing the exploration and advantages of the scientists in characterizing the idea of their

examination. The literature audit provides more data since it is the acknowledgement and

clarification of the connections between factors in the managed and recommended investigation by

the analyst. The literature survey is unique about the different kinds of research, the primary

motivation behind the literature audit is the equivalent, i.e. to give my foundation contemplates, to

check that the examination has not been directed previously, to confirm the connections conceived

in the exploration, to lead the analyst to the critical material, to feel how the variables have been

considered already and featuring vulnerabilities and evacuating cuts in past (Boote and Beile

2005).

2.1 Agency Theory:

The Agency theory goes back to the umpteenth century when it started to highlight in

English precedent-based law and the law of torts. However, the utilization of office hypothesis in

hierarchical financial matters is a later wonder (Shankman 1999). At the center of agency, the

theory is the agency relationship. An agency relationship comprises of one member (the principal)

designating undertakings to another party (the agent) (Eisenhardt, 1989). An agreement supports

the connection between principals and agents ((Shankman 1999). The deal is utilized as a

motivation for agents to adjust their objectives to those of the principal. Under perfect conditions,

the agents would set aside their very own advantages to progress in the direction of the principal's

very own goals (as a rule riches amplification) ((Quinn and Jones 1995) In any case, (Quinn and

Jones 1995)contend that this perfect condition is a regulating view; it is a theory of how agents

ought to carry on yet not something that agents fundamentally follow in all actuality because of

'agency issues '. 'Organization issues’ may happen when:

1. Principals and agents goal conflicting.

2. Difficult to verify what the conflicts

13

An agency theory structure is utilized in the present research to feature the idea of the

connection between investors, directors, and auditors. In a corporate governance setting, positivist

essayists on agency theory contend that the agency relationship alludes to the investors as

principals and proprietors of the organization designating the everyday running of their

organization to the administration. Frequently the principals were end up expelled from their

organization causing a 'remoteness hole' to frame. While the agents are required to report yearly

organization advancement or improvement to the principals, the principals look tor an approach to

prove what the agents are stating. Financial reports are utilized to assess the board execution so the

principals need to guarantee that the agents are making an effort not to facilitate their very own

advantages by trying to depict the organization in the most ideal light conceivable (Bazerman et al.

1997).

Agency theory clarifies that organization lifespan depends on ‘self-interest' (Eisenhardt

1989) with people seen to be 'ethically risky, characterized by characteristics, for example, shrewd

and unfriendly determination including an inclination to lie, cheat, take and evade' (Shankman,

1999). agents cannot be trusted to put the principals' advantages over their very own as agents was

just maintain their organization understandings as long as these understandings are serving the

agents' circumstance. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW)

(2005:6) contends that agents are probably going to have various thought processes to principals.

They might be impacted by components, for example, monetary awards, work showcase openings

for labor and associations with different parties that are not legitimately applicable to principals. It

is dependent upon the principal to set up reasonable instruments between the two parties, (for

example, contracts) to guarantee an arrangement of objectives among agents and principals.

Observing instruments can likewise be set up to keep the agents from carrying on in a crafty way.

Without instruments to screen agents' conduct, and Information 'asymmetry ' exists among

principals and agents, placing agents in a solid position to channel or to control information (Hill

and Jones 1992). 'A basic agency theory model recommends that, because of information

asymmetries and personal responsibility, principal need motivation to believe the agent and try to

determine these worries by setting up systems to adjust the interests of agent to principal and to

decrease the extension for information irregularities and entrepreneurial conduct' (ICAEW, 2005)

An enterprise hypothesis structure is utilized inside the flow research to feature the idea of

the relationship among investors, supervisors, and reviewers. In a corporate administration setting,

positivist authors on association hypothesis contend that the business relationship alludes back to

14

the investors as principals and owners of the enterprise assigning everyday walking around their

association to the administration (Eisenhardt 1989). Frequently the principals wind up expelled

from their office delivering a 'remoteness opening' to shape ((Eisenhardt 1989) While agents are

required to report yearly endeavor advancement to the principals, the principal's appearance tor a

way to substantiate what the merchants are articulating. Money related reports are utilized to assess

control by and large execution so the principals need to guarantee that the operators are not

looking to moreover their one of a kind side interests with the guide of searching for to depict the

company inside the most valuable light practical (Bazerman et al. 1997).

An unqualified review report from a famous auditor was diminish an organization’s agency

costs (Watts et al. 1983) because outsiders was see the report as tenable. Independence is the

'raison deter' of the audit profession and is basic for a functional agency relationship. Significantly,

the monitor is seen by the principals to be in an autonomous position because the principals won't

esteem the financial statement if auditors seem to need independence. A few creators, for example

(Bazerman et al. 1997) contend that there is an inherent logical inconsistency in the connection

between the monitor and the agents which avoid screens being free. Commentators argue that it is

unthinkable for the monitor to be free when they are contracted and paid by the general population

who are influenced by the monitor’s work. Agents have a monetary control over the monitor, and

this pair can now and then lead to 'alliance shaping' among agents and monitor. Looked with a

questionable accounting issue, monitors may yield to the agent’s desires because of a paranoid fear

of losing a huge customer. (Glickman 2000) has compared the connection among operators and

screens to 'the home baseball crew being permitted to employ the umpire, or a writer being

permitted to choose the book analyst'. The ICAEW (2005:8) features how 'the arrangement of

expert auditors produces a further agency relationship which in tum impacts on trust and makes

new issues identifying with their independence. Moreover, (Chow and Rice 1982) have discovered

exact help for the dispute that organizations switch their auditors in the wake of accepting a

certified audit supposition. (Chow and Rice 1982)) contend that the administration would prefer

not to get a certified sentiment since it can influence the market price of the organization's stock

and it can influence the management remuneration.

There is an apprehension that managers utilize the risk of changing to another auditor to

guarantee that the organization gets a perfect audit sentiment. The danger of exchanging an auditor

can put extraordinary pressure on an evaluator's target perspective. To put it plainly, it has been

proposed that an auditor expectation gap exists. An audit desires gap is the gap between the public

15

perspective on what an auditor ought to do and the audit apparent performance. Open enthusiasm

for this expected gap is high because of later corporate disappointments. Even though an auditor

might be truly significant to an owner, it would be somewhat nearsighted for him not to know

about the issues which the auditors can likewise make. For what reason should it be clear that he

should follow up in the interest of the owner of the interests of the two parties are not

indistinguishable'. The Enron breakdown demonstrates how the insatiability and shrewd conduct of

top administrators implied that the auditors and directors neglected to ensure the interests of the

principals, 'this happened through the continuous distortion of monetary reports and wasteful

observing systems that are ending up logically unsafe to the principal (Arnold and De Lange 2004).

Andersen, the outside examiners (screens), was enlisted to speak to the interests of the principals

and lessen agency issues by expanding the information symmetry between principal and agent'

(Arnold and De Lange 2004).

One may address whether Andersen would direct an exhaustive audit of exchange that they

effectively affirmed (and for which they got a charge) earning their counseling caps' (Culpan et al.

2005)Personal circumstance and the arrangement of the agents and monitor caused a full-scale

breakdown of the agency association with principals' stockholdings getting to be useless and the

downfall of both Enron and its monitors.

Agency theory isn't without its faultfinders or critics. (Shankman 1999)utilizes the

investor's theory to censure agency theory, expressing that the two speculations are 'perfect

inverses'. (Shankman 1999) contends that the focal point of the agency relationship is excessively

restricted. Conversely, the partner hypothesis adjusts the requirements of all the organization’s

partners. Shareholder's theory contends that just by accomplishing a harmony between all the

organization's partners can an organization endure. As opposed to agency theory, Shareholder's

opinion expresses that organizations have duties to all partners for 'moral reasons' (Shankman

1999) and that nobody set of interests ought to be given need over another. For instance, agency

theory expresses that administrators are ethically obliged to work considering a legitimate concern

for the owner as the proprietors have given the capital and have gone for broke.

In any case, stakeholder theory contends that different interests likewise should be met to

amplify for instance, the premiums of the suppliers who give the products and parts to sell (so have

additionally gone for broke) and the premiums of the agents or employee who help the

organization to work (known as the key partner approach(Shankman 1999). Stakeholder theory

expresses that just by perceiving partner interests can operators 'maintain their authoritative

commitment to principals' (Shankman 1999). Considering the reactions of agency theory,

16

Shankman contends that 'models of the firm that just perceive owner-director or economic

connections are conflicting with the principles of market financial matters. In any case, Shankman

surrenders that agency theory is the foundation of numerous administration theories with partner

hypothesis speaking to a dubious methodology, 'in all actuality, numerous organizations still

depend on strategies got from and make a move as per the principles of agency theory.

The problem under agency theory is the control and responsibility section for the agency.

The control and property division are particularly available in registered organization (Jensen and

Meckling 1976). The interests of the ruler and the owner of the war are very important.

Compensation contracts are operational when planned. Given the procedure, the most appropriate

agreement between the two parties.

Agency theory indicates that it involves transferring a decision-making authority between

the shareholders and managers to the representative to conduct a specific service on its behalf

(Jensen &Mackling, 1976). The growth and separation of ownership and control by the corporation

lead to the emergence of large organizations and the delegation of responsibilities and pairs

(Bhandari, 2010). For this reason, the agency problem, which exists from the personal interests of

managers, is more complex in large and diversified organizations because of the complexity of its

products and activities. Shareholders and managers in the relationship are the benefit maxim of

which managers tend not to best fulfill the interests of stakeholders. Managers are ordered to take

accountability in decision-making so that the shareholder must serve the interests of the firms by

maximizing their wealth. However, there was be differences between the decisions of the managers

and the decisions that was maximize the wealth of the shareholders (Jensen and Meckling1976).

Agency theory shows that manager risk-taking has different applications in which managers

can be risky behaviors and exhibit risky behaviors. The characteristics of agency theory emphasize

the risk behaviors of shareholders and managers (Alvarez and Barney 2005). Managers with

appropriate incentives may limit their disagreement with the interests of the shareholders and may

be subject to less monitoring costs to limit the managers' unusual activities. In this way, managers

would not make unnecessary decisions to expand resource that would damage the wealth of

shareholders. On the other hand, incentives may allow managers to take such action to compensate

shareholders.

Agency theory comes from the acknowledgment of more prominent proprietorship and

control of bigger openly held organizations (Zahra 2005) The fundamental need of the theory is

that organizations (enlisted supervisors) have qualities and goals that are essentially unique about

17

their administrators (proprietors). This separation of goals prompts contrasts in various issues or

needs added to partners (Shaker A. Zahra, 2005). The fundamental standard of the theory is that a

definitive assignment of administrators is to do the association in a manner that expands the

estimation of investors. Nonetheless, differences stay in the writing on characterizing and

expanding investor esteems (Agle et al. 1999). As indicated by a few, this solitary method boosting

the company's benefits. For other people, it implies that administrators need to accommodate the

serious desires and requests of their various partners.

Some agency scholars believe that privately-owned companies are a perfect type of

association where the proprietor and the company's objectives are adjusted (Randoy et al. 2003)

This nearby arrangement guarantees successful basic leadership while keeping up the

organization's congruity. The agency scholar likewise noticed that their proprietors are regularly

situated and enabled to settle on significant choices that are perceptible over the long haul;

Therefore, the proprietor administrators was convey their advantages for enhancing themselves and

go about as a compensation for the privileges of their organizations (Steier 2003). In this situation,

entrepreneurs are relied upon to put resource into chiefs to improve organization tasks and keep up

promising business enterprise openings at home or abroad (Shaker A. Zahra,2005). As per this

view (Shaker A. Zahra, 2005), proprietor directors are required to help radical advancements that

expand the organization's development by utilizing the organization's assets or getting collusions

together with organizations outside or outside their parts. These unions bring all the newer

information, assets and ability. Coalitions likewise give chances to adequately contend to rebuild

the associations worth chain and conquer key straightforwardness. Through model and activity,

entrepreneurs were make a culture that registers and urges directors to compute determined

pioneering hazard taking (Shaker A. Zahra, 2005).

In numerous privately-owned companies, authors keep up their initiative by filling in as

ranking directors (CEO). The originators make an actual existence by making employments for

themselves. Likewise, with different businesspeople, there is a serious requirement for progress

among privately-owned company originators, which constrains them to find creative thoughts and

face determined challenges. As indicated by Shaker A. Zahra (2005), most of the authors who

additionally go about as CEOs have formal and casual forces that permit them to assign the

fundamental assets to find and execute promising thoughts in a convenient way. Naturally,

originators are more inventive than different administrators who tail them in driving the

association. These perceptions exhibit the accompanying speculation.

18

Agency scholars call attention to that proprietorship increments and a more noteworthy

concordance is accomplished between the proprietor and the firm (Fama et al. 1983). This

harmonization happens when a family works together. The proprietor urges them to improve their

qualities. The property additionally enables the family to advance thoughts for development and

key change. These perceptions exhibit the accompanying theory.

Families with enormous investors can likewise utilize their voices by forestalling or

attacking major changes that may alter the crucial key of their organization (Shaker A. Zahra,

2005). Vital change is unsafe and requires noteworthy speculations to upgrade the organization's

way of life, forms, and hierarchical structures (Shaker A. Zahra,2005). Organizations regularly

need to roll out these improvements with no assurance of money related achievement, as the

portion of family possession builds, it might be hard to help the major authoritative changes

expected to advance business enterprise, While the abundance of the family is intently attached to

the organization's future, all things considered, the craving to help radical changes (e.g. interests in

problematic and rising innovations or entering outside business sectors) is probably going to

decrease (Shaker A. Zahra, 2005).

Landowner administrators regularly incorporate other relatives inside the venture (Shaker

A. Zahra,2005) and this obligation relatives to comprehend the serious difficulties and openings

confronting the organization. It additionally permits the family to investigate different choices to

talk about the dangers. One of the diligent difficulties looked by some privately-run companies is

the full interest of non-family laborers. At the point when relatives are vigorously included, non-

family laborers may feel denied of key choices and have little caution or opportunity to act. These

representatives should likewise experience relatives to help their thoughts. Privately- run company

representatives cannot pull back and investigate business openings if they are not heard enough.

This detachment can cause some non-family workers to leave the organization - denying the matter

of a rich I of advancement and the danger of enterprise. In this situation, family support turns into

an obstruction to fruitful adjustment rather than inadequate family laborers. These perceptions lead

to the accompanying elective theory. The study is typically focused by the organization's CEO or

senior official who has the most data about the organization's business and vital activities (Zahra,

1991). The attention was on key administration exercises to limit the deceptions of the members.

Information from optional references was additionally used to approve estimates created based on

the poll. Duplicates of the first review. As (Finkelstein et al. 1996) watch, supervisors cause to

notice altogether different pieces of the business condition. Character and worth factors likewise

lighten contrasts in observations, assessments, and convictions of the official members.

19

The consequences of information asymmetry in global marketplaces connect straight forwardly

in past studies, the main agent, which is the main theory. The theory attempts to clarify the

connection between the management (agent) and investor (principal). The connection among the

agent and principle has happened to noteworthy enthusiasm for the previous studies from the

responsibility for has scattered into little portions in the worldwide money related marketplaces and

the administration work has turned out to be to a great extent isolated from the investors. When an

investor gives funding to business where they ordinarily will not hold any dynamic situation in

dealing with the organization then the agency problem was happening. The administration functions

have been assigned to the expert directors who work the business for the investors. Subsequently,

the administration can expend the venture for self-intrigued purposes that advantage the board

however not the shareholders (Jensen and Mackling, 1976). This issue is heightened if the investor

base is broadly scattered which is the situation is the greater part of the listed organizations.

The proprietors, normally, try to guarantee that the administration demonstration in the

proprietors' interests and do not misuse the organization's assets. Instances of the checking

consumptions incorporate outer and inward review, formal control frameworks, spending

confinements and motivating force pay contracts with the executives. Holding users identify with

costs borne by the specialist to ensure arrangement with the investor premium, for example,

authoritative confinements on the director's basic leadership control which force expenses to the

organization too since the chief is not capable take full favorable position everything being equal.

The lingering misfortune speaks to costs that occur paying little heed to the checking and holding

exercises.

Ongoing prominent accounting outrages in the USA have brought about a restored

universal enthusiasm for corporate governance issues. Specifically, the various corporate

breakdown has featured the issues which happen when the administrators of the organization a

cozy association with the auditors/monitors. The present research is supported by agency theory

which diagrams the significant relationship existing between the investors (proprietors of

associations), the manager who runs the firm and the auditor who screen the administration

exercises for the investors. Organizational structure a cozy connection with the auditor. This

research is supported by agency theory which describes the significant relationship existing

between the investors (proprietors of associations), the managers who run the organizations and the

auditors who screen the board exercises for the investors. The fundamental target of the study is to

analyze certain variables that may pulverize the useful task of the agency relationship. At the point

when auditor independence is absent, the agency relationship was never again be successful. The

20

investigation centers around variables that could pulverize the organization relationship and certain

techniques that can be utilized to help ensure compelling agency relationships.

Agency theory goes back to the umpteenth century when it started to highlight in English

precedent-based law and the law of torts. However, the utilization of office hypothesis in

hierarchical financial matters is a later wonder (Shankman, 1999). At the center of agency, the

theory is the agency relationship. An agency relationship comprises of one member (the principal)

designating undertakings to another party (the agent) (Eisenhardt, 1989). An agreement supports the

connection between principals and agents (Shankman, 1999). The agreement is utilized as a

motivation for agents to adjust their objectives to those of the principal. Under perfect conditions,

the agents would set aside their very own advantages to progress in the direction of the principal's

very own goals (Berman et al. 1999). In any case, (Berman et al. 1999) contend that this perfect

condition is a regulating view; it is a theory of how agents ought to carry on yet not something that

agents fundamentally follow in all actuality because of 'agency issues '. 'Organization issues'

(Eisenhardt, 1989) may happen when: The goals of the principal and the agent are conflicting, 2 For

the principal it is difficult/costly to test which. An agency theory structure is utilized in the present

research to feature the idea of the connection between investors, directors, and auditors. In a

corporate governance setting, positivist essayists on agency theory contend that the agency

relationship alludes to the investors as principals and proprietors of the organization designating the

everyday running of their organization to the administration (Eisenhardt, 1989). Frequently the

principals was end up expelled from their organization causing a 'remoteness hole' to frame (Lee and

Kwok 1988). While the agents are required to report yearly organization advancement or

improvement to the principals, the principals look tor an approach to prove what the agents are

stating. Financial reports are utilized to assess the board execution (Antler, 1984) so the principals

need to guarantee that the agents are trying not to facilitate their very own advantages by trying to

depict the organization in the most ideal light conceivable (Bazerman et al., 1997).

Agency theory clarifies that organization lifespan depends on ‘self-interest' (Eisenhardt,

1989) with people seen to be 'ethically risky, characterized by characteristics, for example, shrewd

and unfriendly determination including an inclination to lie, cheat, take and evade' (Shankman,

1999). agents cannot be trusted to put the principals' advantages over their very own as agents was

just maintain their organization understandings as long as these understandings are serving the

agents' circumstance. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW)

(2005) contends that agents are probably going to have various thought processes to principals.

They might be impacted by components, for example, monetary awards, work showcase openings

21

for labor and associations with different parties that are not legitimately applicable to principals. It

is dependent upon the principal to set up reasonable instruments between the two parties, (for

example, contracts) to guarantee an arrangement of objectives among agents and principals.

Observing instruments can likewise be set up to keep the agents from carrying on in a crafty way.

Without instruments to screen agents' conduct, and Information 'asymmetry ' exists among

principals and agents, placing agents in a solid position to channel or to control information (Hill

and Jones 1992). 'A basic agency theory model recommends that, because of information

asymmetries and personal responsibility, principals need motivations to believe their agents and

was try to determine these worries by setting up systems to adjust the interests of agents to

principals and to decrease the extension for information asymmetries and entrepreneurial conduct'

(Macve and research 2010).

An enterprise hypothesis structure is utilized inside the flow research to feature the idea of

the relationship among investors, supervisors, and revisers. In a corporate administration setting,

positivist authors on association hypothesis contend that the business relationship alludes back to

the investors as principals and owners of the enterprise assigning everyday walking around their

association to the administration (Eisenhardt, 1989). Frequently the principals wind up expelled

from their office delivering a 'remoteness opening' to shape (Lee, 1972). While agents are required

to report yearly endeavor advancement to the principals, the principal's appearance tor a way to

substantiate what the merchants are articulating. Money related reports are utilized to assess control

by and large execution (Antler, 1984) so the principals need to guarantee that the operators are not

looking to moreover their one-of-a-kind side interests with the guide of searching for to depict the

company inside the most valuable light practical (Bazerman et al., 1997).

One system, which principals use to forestall crafty conduct, is the work of evaluators as

screens of the agents. An audit by somebody independent of the administrator lessens the

motivating force issues that emerge when the firm director does not possess all the leftover cases

on the firm' (Watts et al. 1983). auditors legitimize and add validity to agents’ announcements

((Skerratt and Research 1982), along these lines supporting the honesty of capital markets (Beattie

et al., 1998). 'A review gives a free keep an eye on crafted by agents and of the data given by an

operator, which keeps up certainty and trust' (ICAEW,2005).

Agency theory isn't without its faultfinders or critics. (Shankman, 1999) utilizes the


inverses'. (Shankman, 1999) contends that the focal point of the agency relationship is excessively

22

restricted. Conversely, the partner hypothesis adjusts the requirements of all the organization's



theory expresses that organizations have duties to all partners for 'moral reasons' (Shankman, 1999)

and that nobody set of interests ought to be given need over another. For instance, agency theory

expresses that administrators are ethically obliged to work in light of a legitimate concern for the

owner as the proprietors have given the capital and have gone for broke.


amplify wealth, for instance, the premiums of the suppliers who give the products and parts to sell

(so have additionally gone for broke) and the premiums of the agents or employee who help the

organization to work (known as the key partner approach) (Shankman, 1999). Stakeholder theory


commitment to principals' (Shankman, 1999). In light of the reactions of agency theory, Shankman

contends that 'models of the firm that just perceive owner-director or economic connections are

conflicting with the principles of market financial matters. In any case, Shankman surrenders that

agency theory is the foundation of numerous administration theories with partner hypothesis

speaking to a dubious methodology, 'in all actuality, numerous organizations still depend on

strategies got from and make a move as per the principles of agency theory.

An unqualified review report from a famous auditor was diminish an organization's agency

costs (Zimmerman, 1983) and help its worth because outsiders was seeing the report as tenable.

Independence is the 'raison deter' of the audit profession and is basic for a practical agency

relationship (Barker et al. 1997). Significantly, the monitor is seen by the principals to be in an

autonomous position because the principals won't esteem the financial statement if auditors seem to

need independence. A few creators for example (Bazerman et al., 1997) contend that there is an

inborn logical inconsistency in the connection between the monitor and the agents which avoid

screens being free. Commentators contend that it is unthinkable for the monitor to be free when

they are contracted and paid by the general population who are influenced by the monitor’s work.

Agents have a monetary control over the monitor and this poor can now and then lead to 'alliance

shaping' (Ballwieser 1987) among agents and monitor. Looked with a questionable accounting

issue, monitors may yield to the agent’s desires because of a paranoid fear of losing a huge

customer. Glickman (1998) has compared the connection among operators and screens to 'the home

baseball crew being permitted to employ the umpire, or a writer being permitted to choose the book

analyst'. The ICAEW (2005) features how further agency relationship is 'the arrangement of expert

23

auditors produces which in tum impacts on trust and makes new issues identifying with their

independence. Moreover, (Chow and Rice 1982) have discovered exact help for the dispute that

organizations switch their auditors in the wake of accepting a certified audit supposition. (Chow

and Rice, 1982) contend that the administration would prefer not to get a certified sentiment since

it can influence the market price of the organization's stock and it can influence the management

remuneration.




proposed that an auditor’s expectation gap (Beattie et al., 1998) exists. An audit desires gap is the

gap between the public perspective on what an auditor ought to do and the audit apparent

performance. Open enthusiasm for this expected gap is high because of later corporate

disappointments. 'Even though an auditor might be truly significant to an owner, it would be

somewhat nearsighted for him not to know about the issues which the auditors can likewise make.

For what reason should it be clear that he should follow up in the interest of the owner of the

interests of the two parties are not indistinguishable?' (Ballwieser, 1987). The Enron breakdown

demonstrates how the insatiability and shrewd conduct of top administrators implied that the

auditors and directors neglected to ensure the interests of the principals, 'this happened through a

continuous distortion of monetary reports and wasteful observing systems that i're ending up

logically unsafe to the principal (Arnold and De Lange, 2004). Andersen, the outside examiners

(screens), was enlisted to speak to the interests of the principals and lessen agency issues by

expanding the information symmetry between principal and agent' (Arnold and De Lange, 2004).

In any case, the monitors ire prompting the agents on the best way to control the information given

to the principals (Culpan et al. 2005).

Agency theory expresses that the monitor ought to be autonomous of the agent and free

from irreconcilable circumstances with the organization and its operators however Andersen got

$52 million in expenses from Enron, half of which ire for counseling (Culpan et al., 2005). One

may address whether Andersen would direct an exhaustive audit of exchange that they effectively

affirmed (and for which they got a charge) their counseling caps'. Personal circumstance and the

arrangement of the agents and monitor caused a full-scale breakdown of the agency association

with principals' stockholdings getting to be useless and the downfall of both Enron and its

monitors. The ICAEW (2005) expresses that while the principals of an association need to close

collaboration with the auditor to an exhaustive audit. 'This relaxed relationship led (and continues

24

to use) investors to examine what is visible and real independence of auditors and to request harder

to analysis of panel data method and gauges over independence to ensure them '. In light of the

Enron model, (Arnold and De Lange, 2004) by and by the inquiry whether the division of

proprietorship and control in modem associations is a 'feasible establishment'. Monetary model

depends on agency theory and gives the premise to the present study. Antler’s model is the most

generally alluded to agency theory model. In Antle's model, the agent soft he customer

organization are depicted as being exertion disinclined, not satisfying their obligation of riches

expansion to the principals. Be that as it may, _should the principals understand that the agents are

not satisfying their duties, there is a hazard that the agents were be supplanted or given a lower

compensation. The agents have a motivation to distort the organization's financial statement reports

to trick the principals into imagining that their wealth is being expanded. As the principals

understand that the agents may not carry on truly, the principals employ auditors to monitors the

agents. In any case, the agents can reward the monitors in the shape of a bribe to persuade the

principals that the agents are performing tasks appropriately. It is just the risk to the monitor

notoriety which may serve to keep the monitor honest. Likewise, with numerous models, Antle's s

(1982) model has been scrutinized for being over• streamlined and being founded on 'restricted

suppositions about human behavior (Kleinman et al., 1998:7). In this manner, Antle's model may

not give a totally precise impression of human-human behavior.

Agency theory isn't without its faultfinders or critics. (Shankman, 1999) utilizes the


inverses'. (Shankman, 1999) contends that the focal point of the agency relationship is excessively

restricted. Conversely, the partner hypothesis adjusts the requirements of all the organization's



theory expresses that organizations have duties to all partners for 'moral reasons' (Shankman, 1999)

and that nobody set of interests ought to be given need over another. For instance, agency theory

expresses that administrators are ethically obliged to work considering a legitimate concern for the

owner as the proprietors have given the capital and have gone for broke.


amplify wealth, for instance, the premiums of the suppliers who give the products and parts to sell

(so have additionally gone for broke) and the premiums of the agents or employee who help the

organization to work (known as the key partner approach) (Shankman, 1999). Stakeholder theory


25

commitment to principals' (Shankman, 1999). Considering the reactions of agency theory,

Shankman contends that 'models of the firm that just perceive owner-director or economic

connections are conflicting with the principles of market financial matters. In any case, Shankman

surrenders that agency theory is the foundation of numerous administration theories with partner

hypothesis speaking to a dubious methodology, 'in all actuality, numerous organizations still

depend on strategies got from and make a move as per the principles of agency theory.

The agency theory problem is the partition of governor and responsibility as the manager

deals with the investment possessed by the standard. The partition of controller and proprietorship

is particularly current in the recorded organizations (Jensen and Mackling, 1976). In this manner,

pay assertions to boost the board to act in the proprietors' interests is a key component to build up

the firm structures (Jensen and Mackling, 1976), a proficient remuneration understanding adjusts

the enthusiasm of agent and principle.

The interests of managers and investors either fight when there are very risky negative

supervisors and limit the exercises to accept open doors that benefit as much as possible from the

firm performance or the administrator goes for at the maximum level of risk to accomplish to the

reward goals (Fama, 1980). Remuneration contracts are employable at what time they are arranged

properly to interface fulfill the compensation paid to the firm to the administration. At the point

when I think about the system for utilizing and observing the ideal agreements among the

executives and the investors top managerial staff is normally the body that has obligation over

adjusting the premiums amongst the two gatherings. Considered as a Board the essential

administration instrument for the arrangement of interests (Fama et al., 1983). As historical writing

has discovered that in the corporate governance structure of firms the board has a key job, I was

concentrate on the board's job in the performance list of initial public offerings in this report.

2.2 Stock Price

By acquiring stocks, an individual can guarantee for present and future firm benefits. The

stock price is controlled by the price paid for the benefit (DeFina 1991). There is numerous writing

accessible to test the stock price connection among large scale and microeconomic factors. It has

been demonstrated that stock values change as per financial and political news, and

macroeconomic elements have solid force with stock prices. The offer price is the piece of the

overall industry esteem toward the year's end. Proprietors get money installments equivalent to

their present worth and this is known as the stock price. These money installments made by

investors are imperceptible and rely upon the benefit and proficiency of a firm. The type of stock

26

exchanging depends on every day exchanging on rising stock markets dependent on estimates. In

Jordan, stock prices are impacted by a portion of the elements portrayed in certain investigations

and all around, stock prices are affected by diaries, articles, and factors depicted by Rita S.

furthermore, (Disegna 2007). In 1994 and 1995, they watched the unpredictability of stock profits

for a regular schedule with 159 examples of protections at the Amman Stock Exchange. The

outcomes show that if stocks arrive at the upper price points of confinement of 5%, they were

increase most extreme instability on that day and the next day, if the stock hit comes to - 5% price

loir constrains, the outcomes was be the equivalent and the outcomes was be the equivalent. in any

case, less. This investigation gave the specialist another looks. In his theory, (White et al. 2006)

caused to notice the advancement states of the South Pacific Stock Exchange (SPSE) after its

foundation. It demonstrated the conditions that opposed the improvements and offered a few

thoughts for advancement. The outcomes indicated that SPSE has not yet been created and

showcase truths are not acceptable. The examination found that Fiji's stock markets had feeble

liquidity and that the volume of this market was low. He contends that Fiji's stock trades can be

created in handling the difficulties, and, they should execute approaches to improve the stock

markets.

(Levine and Zervos 1998) examine various measures in which economic growth in various

nations decidedly connects with stock market slants and is solid in creating nations. These

outcomes additionally show that if the states of the old economic and political variables are

controlled, at that point the improvement of the bank and the stock market is unequivocally

connected with the development of the economy now and later on. (Durham 2002), the relapse

inspecting method in the high-salary nations, the stock market is a positive motivation for more

research, and this circumstance decreases the association with low-pay nations. It has ended up

being a constructive outcome of stock market advancement in created nations with high stock

trade, low influence, and solid lawful improvements. Timmerman (1995) has demonstrated that

developments in stock prices are some of the time related to markdown rates and future returns.

(Corwin 2003) calls attention to that there is less certainty and questionable data is emphatically

impacted by the company's stock prices and accordingly the device was be low priced. As the past

writing shows, full scale and smaller scale factors influence stock prices in the stock market,

however, this impact varies at various occasions, in various economies, in various forms, and

various enterprises, yet the outcome is that most factors show a similar conduct as opposed to time,

economy or industry. For instance, if expansion and financing costs increment and profits

lessening, and productivity diminish, it might negatively affect value prices. (Raihan

27

2009)expressed that the frail structure proficiency speculation did not acknowledge the

autocorrelation coefficient and arbitrary strolling model and was not acknowledged by standard

return arrangement in Chittagong Stock Exchange and Bangladesh. Similar outcomes ire dictated

by (Uddin and Auditing 2009)on the Dhaka Stock Exchange in Bangladesh.

The development in share price growth depicted by (Hýsek et al. 2009) is that organizations

build up their money related positions and proportions to characterize their budgetary positions, for

example, net benefit and profit per share. Any data about price change can influence stocks and

trades, and this data is critical for future upgrades. This data comprises all components including

macroeconomic variables, microeconomic elements, and mental, political, and abstract elements.

At the point when long haul speculations are considered, macroeconomic factors are solid and key

variables. (Kandir and economics 2008) expressed that the connection between macroeconomic

factors and stock returns increased after 1986. (Blume-Kohout 2010) expressed that over the long

haul, share prices are impacted by the measure of cash in the economy. (Flannery and

Protopapadakis 2002) have recognized numerous significant macroeconomic factors, for example,

exchange balance, cash supply, new lodging, and joblessness. A few examinations show that stock

markets might be improved later with the assistance of macroeconomic factors. The point of

examination is to characterize the effect of macroeconomic factors on the share prices.

Remember that the connection between development openings and endeavor hazard taking

is yet questionable (John et al., 2008). Studies demonstrate that organizations' readiness to go out

on a limb by making beneficial speculation is the principal long-haul monetary development

(Acemoglu and Zilibotti 1997). Observational examination among UK organizations proposes that

development openings are related to future development openings (Danbolt et al. 2018).

The corporate key venture expects firms to give assets to future development (Fernandes et al.

2011). High hazard taking by development firms can make potential speculation open doors

revenue driven (Kogut and Kulatilaka 1994a) Development openings are imperative and regularly

fortify the upper hand of firms and turn into the focal worries of the corporate procedure

(Woolridge and Snow, 1990). Corporate venture activities can be in the interior or outside

structures relying upon the requirements of firms. Firms can create profitable assets for the upper

hand, asset gathering inside the organization, and asset securing from outside the firm (Sciarelli

2008) Outer corporate speculation incorporates joint endeavors and acquisitions, while outside

corporate venture incorporates new establishments, cutting edge innovation, machine trades or

product

28

offering extension. Expanding requests in development gives higher development openings and

rivalry to drive chiefs to look for high-chance venture tasks to augment investor (Busch and

Lassmann 2010). The intensity in the business urges firms to have high development open doors as

hazard searchers from venture ventures (Pontiff and Economics 2006).

Remaining organizations incline toward speculation ventures with high development

openings prompting the organization's exceedingly capricious increases (Galai and Masulis 1976).

Expanding organization hazard builds the investors' value an incentive in the meantime and

diminishes the market chance against investors. Firm development is broadly learned at both

hypothetical and observational dimensions. As per Gabbart law, the development of firms is

autonomous of firm size. Experimental examinations demonstrate that firm size and development

opportunities are rejected from the model, yet few investigations cannot be rejected for substantial

firms. It is generally acknowledged that the size and age, as ill as the different systems, influence

the development rate. It will not be conceivable to anticipate the utilization of existing and

authentic data about the tasks of firms that outcome in organization development, even though it

can't be predicted. Exact examinations demonstrate that the information on corporate development

opportunity is deliberate and unusual (Geroski et al. 1997).

(Sah and Stiglitz 1986) are examining for a fixed number of ventures. For this situation,

adding more members to the basic leadership gathering would prompt the dismissal of unsafe

undertakings and the acknowledgment of okay tasks. It is basic to check this parameter to look in

danger taking among firms. At the end of the day, for organizations with a similar number of tasks,

the effect of the extent of the board ought to be thought about. Unmistakably, in any case,

organizations have a heterogeneous speculation opportunity. [For precedent, a youthful imaginative

organization has ordinarily more dangerous activities than an old organization of similar size.

Because of this heterogeneity, the effect of the extent of the board is probably going to change

between firms. Specifically, a bigger basic leadership gathering may not prompt higher hazard

ventures, gave the firm has numerous speculation openings. The thought is that there was be (great)

unsafe ventures experiencing the screening procedure and may prompt increasingly (better or more

awful) hazardous activities being rejected. With this last set, a venture rich firm should have as

many hazardous speculations as most of its underlying tasks are denied (because of progressively

stringent outputs for a bigger board). Thus, this organization was showing a higher market an

incentive alongside a high-hazard profile. This suggestion, (Shifren 2008) even though the impacts

of bigger sheets are return as ordinarily negative, they may include an incentive now and again.

29

Another potential job for substantial institutional speculators is to give a dependable

instrument to exchanging data to money related markets, i.e., to different financial specialists. As

indicated by (Gillan and Starks 2000), huge institutional financial specialists can exchange the

private data got from the administration to different investors. In any case, all together for such an

observation to be dependable, the primary investor should keep up an adequate measure of

speculation and get adequate offers to relieve the issue of free driving. The outcome was be an

acquiring for an administrator and a helpful chief for the corporate speculator who, now and again,

makes costly checking to supervisory directors. Hence, (Gillan and Starks 2000) contend that this

kind of checking is the most proper path for both extensive financial specialists and executives.

Then again, (Shleifer and Vishny 1986) anticipate an expansive investor who needs to assume

responsibility for the firm. There are contrasts between the checking capacities and motivations of

institutional financial specialists and the motivators of non-institutional huge square proprietors.

(Gorton and Kahl 1999) contend that institutional speculators might be erroneous on account of

interior organization issues. Be that as it may, even the deficient observing given by the

institutional speculator is invited by the investors, as there are insufficient individual blockers to

give better checking. Consequently, in the Gorton and Kahl show, extensive venture financial

specialists and vast non-institutional blockers are existing together as an organization screen.

Observational proof of whether institutional financial specialists are doing compelling

checking is to some degree confused. For instance, (Hartzell and Starks 2003; Gillan et al. 2003)

give exact proof that institutional speculators offer to check to observe in implementation pay

contracts. In the first place, they locate a positive connection between organization proprietorship

and the compensation affectability of an association's act pay. Second, they revealed a negative

connection between organization possession focus and paid pay. One aftereffect of these outcomes

is that, in the light of the hypothetical writing on the job of the primary investor, the organizations

have a more noteworthy effect when there is more prominent corresponding danger in firms.

Correspondingly, (Chung et al. 2002) expressed that corporate supporting additions would be

increasingly hearty in organizations with progressively institutional speculator possession because

the establishments would apply light on firms to embrace better bookkeeping approaches. The

income the executives was most likely settle the advantage with the goal that it won't profit the

supervisors. When institutional financial specialists have an extensive level of the offers of an

organization, they find less deft profit the executives (i.e., less utilization of discretionary

accumulations). Interestingly, (Renneboog and finance 2000) does not discover proof of a checking

job by institutional financial specialists in the Belgian stock trade. Some exploration looks at the

30

connection between an organization's complete organization proprietorship and R and D

speculation and inspects the effect of corporate property on the board conduct, yet these outcomes

achieve blended outcomes. Establishing that expanded business possession is related to higher R

and D spending, (Bushee 1998) contends that the supervisors of aggregate associations decrease

the might that compels them to act nearsighted however that the checking pair fluctuates as per the

kind of institutional financial specialist. Specifically, it is seen that establishments portrayed by

high turnover and force exchange empower nearsighted conduct in chiefs. In any case, (Wahal and

McConnell 2000) arrive at an alternate decision when considering R and D and property, plant and

gear consumptions. They contend that there is no proof that institutional financial specialists add to

the administration of nearsightedness, paying little mind to their venture style. (Cummings and

Knott 2018) locate that institutional speculators are less benefit the board (innovative work) on the

off chance that they have a more noteworthy offer of the organization. Others guarantee that

foundations assume a critical job. (Agrawal et al. 1990) found that organizations with bigger

organization possession have higher stock value endless supply of legacy changes. (Grier et al.

1994)locate a backward connection between institutional financial specialist proprietorship and

institutional influence and recommend that two potential observing instruments assume a

substitution job. Interestingly, (Duggal and Millar 1999) inferred that dynamic corporate

speculators did not assume an imperative job in the takeover showcase since they couldn't discover

a connection between organization proprietorship and bidders. In numerous economies, huge

investors and concentrated proprietorship are key factors in corporate administration instead of

corporate possession. As recently referenced, issues between the supervisors and investors

anticipated by (Mizruchi and Society 2004) in economies with changing land structures may not

be normal. Without a doubt, (La Porta et al. 1999) presume that the issue of the primary

establishment in numerous economies is to restrain the seizure of minority investors by controlling

investors as opposed to confining the exercises of non-capable expert supervisors. As indicated by

these creators, controlling hindrances in these economies can profit by extraordinary control points

of interest to the detriment of different investors. There is a universally striking structure variety.

(Abarca et al. 1998) report that even though the biggest investor sin Chilecontro l40% of the

biggest organizations, this tumbles to 22% for Germany and 7% for Japan. Be that as it may, there

is a more noteworthy dispersion of offers in the US, and the biggest investor, for the most part,

counterpane data method as meager as 5% of casting ballot rights. There might be contrasts

between the biggest investor and the biggest investor gathering. Prowse (1992) gives proof that the

main five investors in Japan have over 30% of the offers of traded on an open market organization.

31

(La Porta et al. 1999) announced that 36% of the world’s biggest traded on an open market

organization (the main 20 in every nation) are kept expansive and 30% are constrained by the

family. 18% in state control, 15% in other property structures. The creators found that substantial

investors initially utilized pyramid structures rather than various casting ballot rights in charge

organizations. 26% of the example firms had a pyramidal structure (different layers of corporate

proprietorship that furnished control of casting ballot rights with generally low speculation levels).

In a normal nation, family proprietors controlled 25% of the estimation of the best 20 firms. At

long last, La Porta et al. (1999) discovered little proof that banks ire constrained by a money

related organization, for example, (outside Germany) and little proof of common offers made by

different organizations. (Faccio and Lang 2002) inspect the possession and control of more than

5000 organizations in Eastern Europe. They have discovered that organizations with substantial

quantities of casting ballot rights or next to no utilization of the pyramid structure are broadly held

or constrained by the family. As indicated by Facia and Lang (2002), Becht and Roell (1999) give

proof of winning square responsibility for drilling in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy,

Spain, and the Netherlands (less predominant proof of UK proprietorship). In most of these nations,

the middle number of members in the example surpassed half. The creators infer that in most

mainland Europe, there are huge square proprietors who can control and control authority over

administration. Steady with the creators, LaPorte, Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer (1999), the

creators presumed that the fundamental irreconcilable circumstance is against the landowners and

expert directors in the United States, just as among investors and minority investors. (Claessens et

al. 2000)looked at the gathering participation in seven East Asian nations and Chile. They found

that 75% of the organizations recorded ire related to working gatherings contrasted with 40% in

Chile in East Asia. (Valadares and Leal 2000) expressed that they found a high level of

proprietorship thickness in traded on an open market organization in Brazil, giving proof that the

primary investor had a normal offer of 41%. 24 East Asian environments, the ways of I(Claessens

et al. 2002) contend that the refinement among casting a ballot and income right sin East Asian

organizations is identified with the potential seizure of minority investors and low market esteems.

Also, Fan and Wong (2002) found that income is less enlightening within the sight of concentrated

possession, pyramidal property structures, and corresponding subsidiaries. (Claessens et al. 2002)

contend that the East Asian capital markets frequently appear to be equipped for confiscating

among gatherings under strict control by requesting higher profits paid by organizations subsidiary

to these gatherings. The creators guarantee that these capital markets don't get a bigger number of

profits than organizations in gatherings that just have moderate dimensions of control. Contrasts in

32

property structures, the lawful condition, and the job of institutional financial specialists among

nations may have distinctive impacts. For instance, (Brunello et al. 2003) contend that

proprietorship, family control, restricted institutional financial specialist activism and insufficient

bank checking lead to an Italian corporate administration structure overwhelmed by insiders. To

decide if such a structure still gives satisfactory observing, the creators survey the CEO's turnover

in Italian firms, and the non-CEO infers that the board can give a checking system that replaces the

absence of free directors. Moreover, (Leuz et al. 2003)demonstrate that distinctions in property

focus may influence income the board in a specific nation, however, don't unveil contrasts in profit

the executives between nations. At long last, (Onguka et al. 2019) contend that property

proprietorship, which is basic in numerous nations, clarifies financial specialists' partialities of

lodging.

The trade-off theory also supports the current research in some aspects of the stock price.

According to the trade-off theory, The Trade-off theory described how firms benefit from debt

financing and equity financing to balance costs and benefits. The capital structure is determined by

the balance between the benefits of debt and the costs of debt. Most corporate finance literature

shows that the key to foreign trade theory is taxation and the burden of bankruptcy. The tax

insolvency foreign trade perspective is that firms balance the tax payments of the debt against the

costs of bankruptcy.

From the Agency's point of view, debt managers can control and reduce the problems of the

agency of free cash flow because the debt must be repaid to avoid bankruptcy (Jensen and

Mackling, 1976; Jensen, 1986). Although the debt alleviates the conflict of shareholders and

managers, the conflicts in shareholders and debt areas are exacerbated. Firms with high earnings

volatility are facing greater costs than financial problems and should use less debt. High earning

volatility can reduce the likelihood of full use of tax protection. Most capital structure theory

suggests that the type of assets a company has affected the choice of capital structure. High debt

levels in a company force shareholder to invest more due to bankruptcy threat (Mccall et al. 1982).

Risk-taking is a critical component of corporate success. Risk is defined as the uncertainty

of a company's income stream (Bowman, 1980). The globalization of technological development,

the demand of customers and the continuous increase in the competitive market led to a

challenging job worldwide (Istman, 2009). The nature of risk-taking behavior can significantly

affect corporate performance. Previous research has shown that literature on innovation,

organizational change, and general management has a significant impact on risk-taking behavior

33

and future performance (Kanter, 1983). Empirical studies show that the global factor, which

directly moves its coordinates in financial environments beyond direct limits, supports the

company to take more risks (Bruno and Shin 2015). In short, the global factor causes companies to

be risky and increase the return of firms (Reeb et al. 1998).

2.3 Corporate Governance:

The relationship between corporate governance and ownership structure has been examined

in the literature devoted to corporate governance (Javid and Iqbal 2008). The most critical division

between corporate governance systems is the variation in ownership and control amongst countries.

Corporate governance is apparent in the ownership and control ratio and in the identity of

controlling shareholders. While some systems strengthen property control or insider-learning

systems, some of them commonly carry proprietary or external system (Maher and Andersson

2000).

According to (Abdullatif and Al‐Khadash 2010) that the corporate governance of Asian

companies is unproductive due to legal systems. (Omran et al. 2008) ) showed that Jordan is one of

the countries with the highest ownership density. Family bookmarks take less risk than family take

but take less risk. I also believe that it is important to examine the outcome of this behavior.

Perhaps the most recurring theme among those interested in EO is related to the positive effects of

entrepreneurial processes on growth and performance (Lumpkin and Dess 1996). Property and

management mean that owners and managers are the same people or represent the same owner

family (Jensen and Mackling 1976). Some characteristics of the Asian corporate governance

mentioned in the literature include a large level of overlap between concentrated ownership, broad

family ownership, control family ownership and management, significant cross-ownership

relationships, and pyramidal ownership structure. The enormous stated that the state directly owns

the influence of management appointments, and finally the use of higher levels of management of

professional managers (Globerman et al., 2011). Some authors found that family-owned firms

while involved in entrepreneur activities take lesser risk than nonfamily firms (Naldi et al. 2007).

One of the key dimensions of corporate governance is ownership and is defined by

institutional governance mechanisms at the country level, such as the creation of a stock exchange

and regulation of the country and intervention practices (La Porta et al., 1998). The framework of

agency theory assumes conflicts between two groups, between managers and shareholders, and

among stakeholders, particularly among shareholders and bondholders (Jensen & Mackling, 1976;

Watts, 1977). At the same time, the owners of the companies do not manage the assets of the

company, especially in the case of large companies. This leads to discriminatory problems between

34

those who own the companies and those who operate them. Professional managers are hired to

work for the company, and these companies, shareholders and their representatives are creating the

potential for moral hazard problems. This separation was take place from the authority

shareholders to the management which can manage the operation more effectively ((Monks and

Minow 2003).

Corporate ownership in my research includes the private and public ownership in the total

ownership structure. Corporate owners have dramatically increased their ownership in recent years,

and since 1992 they have controlled almost 50 percent of all paid-in equity (Smith, 1996).

Researchers argued that the increase in enterprise-level was associated with a decline in the

competitiveness and financial performance of US firms ((Graves and Waddock 1994) According to

this argument, this decline is partly due to the need for frequent and regular improved results of

corporate fund managers. Since their awards are based on quarterly results (Craves & Waddock,

1994), they earn short-term gains. To be responsive, firms have not been managing top

management for a long time or responding to various stakeholders, such as communities,

employees, the environment, and women and minorities.

In the recent past, the ownership structure has a worldwide problem for regulators,

organizations, many researchers and existing authorities in the accounting profession (Globerman

etal.,2011). The empirical and theoretical work on ownership affects firm performance and firm

value and affects financial reporting quality, proving that the ownership structure is very important

in companies. Moreover, (Demsetz and Lehn 1985) argue that block holder ownership may lead to

reduced management behavior at the discretion of management, to encourage the adoption of

profitable strategies and to the disclosure of credible and relevant information.

Dong and Zhang (2008) stated that the structure of ownership is one of the most critical

features of the corporate governance of the listed companies and that the structure affects the

boards of direct listed companies. In the meantime, (Kamel et al. 2012) confirm the relationship

between internet-based reporting and the ownership structure of the firm.

Keep in mind that the relationship between growth opportunities and enterprise risk-taking is still

uncertain (John et al., 2008). Studies show that firms' daringness to take a high risk by making a

profitable investment is the main long-term economic growth (Acemoglu and Zilibotti 1997). An

empirical study among UK companies suggests that growth opportunities are associated with

future growth opportunities (Wesson and Botha 2019).

Corporate strategic investment requires firms to provide resource for future growth

(Woolridge and Snow 1990)). High risk-taking by growth firms can create potential investment

35

opportunities for profit (Kogut and Kulatilaka 1994b).Growth opportunities are important and often

strengthen the competitive advantage of firms and become the central concerns of corporate

strategy (Woolridge and Snow, 1990). Corporate investment projects can be in internal or external

forms depending on the needs of firms. Firms can develop valuable resource for competitive

advantage, stock market accumulation within the company, and stock market acquisition from

outside the firm (Sciarelli 2008). The external corporate investment includes joint ventures and

acquisitions, while external corporate investment includes new installations, advanced technology,

machine exchanges or product line expansion. Increasing demand in innovation provides higher

growth opportunities and competition to force managers to seek high-risk investment projects to

maximize shareholder wealth (Rajan and Zingales 2000) Competitiveness in the industry ,firms to

have high growth opportunities as risk seekers from investment projects (Pontiff,2004).

However, different researchers (Anderson et al., 2003) have found that the family unit

receiving unit has little diversity and is, therefore, riskier than non-family companies. Also,

different aspects have been established in the literature on State-owned and private-owned

companies to distinguish between family and non-family close companies. (Iannotta et al. 2007)

selected an example of 181 banks from fifteen EU regions. They found that state-owned financial

institutions had poor credit quality compared to other financial institutions, such as personal and

mutual banks, in terms of performance and risk. Public banks have a higher risk and low credit

quality than mutual banks. According to Laeven (1999), foreign banks are riskier than state-owned

banks, corporate and family businesses. Many studies (Gonzalez, 2005 and Laeven and Levine,

2009) have shown that deposit insurance, operational restrictions, capital regulations and the

protection of shareholders affect the flexibility of bank owners in taking risks. For example, deposit

insurance increases the flexibility and incentives of shareholders to increase risk (Keeley, 1990).

(Chun 2011) documented the impact of administrative ownership on risk-taking by

Japanese and Korean banks. They concluded that advanced management ownership increased the

risk of Japanese banks and did not increase the overall risk of banks in Korea. Chou and Lin (2011)

conducted a study to examine the impact of various types of ownership of banks on risk- taking in

Taiwan. They concluded that banks with high government ownership and high managerial

ownership ire at high risk and banks with high government ownership ire at a lower risk. (Hussain

et al. 2018) examined a large sample of European banks and claimed that state ownership in banks

positively correlated with operational risk and negatively associated with default risk. Garcia-

Marco and Robes-Fernandez (2008) decided on Spanish banks, where government banks are

taking a higher risk. Shleifer and Vishny (1986) argued that external shareholders, such as

36

shareholders who have broad voting rights between blockage holders and institutions, have a

significant impact on bank risk. Although risk-taking is a central issue in research on warehousing

agencies (Furlong and Keeley (1989), who examine the relationship between management

ownership and risk-taking in the banking sector, and (Cebenoyan et al. 1995) which examine the

relationship between ownership structure and bankruptcy risk (S & L). (Saunders et al. 1990))

review the large banks in 1985 in 1978, and that shareholder-controlled banks (with high

managerial equity positions) exhibit more risk-taking behavior than manager-controlled banks

(with low operating equity) positions between 1979 and 1982). (Saunders et al. 1990)found that S

&Ls with higher managerial ownership behave more at risk than other S&Lsat the time of

regulation. Flexibility and tolerance (1988) and risk risk-taking behavior during regulatory rigidity

and intolerance (1991). However, Cebenoyan, Cooperman and Register focus on bankruptcy risk

(measured as a dichotomous variable according to the capitalist ratio of S & L) rather than market-

based risk measures used in this study. Since my study is directly related to (Saunders et al. 1990),

my discussion focuses on their analysis.

(Mintzberg 1983) reveals two basic dimensions of the property. “Participation” (and

opposing “separation”) distinguishes between owners and non-owners who influence the decisions

or activities of the firm. 'Concentration' (and the opposite 'distribution') distinguishes between

companies whose stocks are closely held and those that are closely held. The cross-classification of

the two dimensions forms many types of property: dispersed - discrete, dispersed - included,

concentrated - separate and concentrated - included. The more interested the owners and the more

intense ownership they have, the bigger they have in influencing the company (Mintzberg, 1983).

Remaining companies prefer investment projects with high growth opportunities leading to

the company's highly unpredictable gains (Galai and Masulis, 1976). Increasing company risk

increases the shareholders' equity value at the same time and decreases the market risk against

shareholders. Firm growth is widely studied at both theoretical and empirical levels. According to

Gibrat law, the growth of firms is independent of firm size. Empirical studies show that firm size

and growth opportunities are rejected from the model, but few studies cannot be rejected for large

firms. It is widely accepted that not only the size and age but also the various strategies affect the

growth rate. It was not be possible to predict the use of existing and historical information about

the operations of firms that result in company growth, although it cannot be foreseen. Empirical

studies show that the data on corporate growth opportunity is systematic and unpredictable

(Geroski, Machin and Walters, 1997). In my study, I include the given variables of corporate

governance.

37

2.4 CEO Duality:

CEO duality. All in all, CEO duality alludes to a circumstance where a's CEO likewise fills

in as the executive of the board. Agency theory recommends that the duality of the CEO

diminishes the board's viability on the executives. (Fama et al. 1983) propose that jobs of a CEO

(choice administration) and seat proprietor (i.e., choice control) ought to be isolated, others was

attempted to deal with the sheets of executives and may kill the directorate in observing

administration openings. Likewise, asset reliance theory proposes that institutional sheets are a

component for overseeing outer conditions and lessening ecological vulnerabilities. In this manner,

consolidating the choice administration and control into a solitary position offers help for

convenient and ideal choices to guarantee auspicious and positive outcomes. Also, (Pfeffer and

Salanick, 1978) contended that those with more noteworthy basic leadership force could more

readily actualize their key choices and be bound to conquer authoritative latency. ( Brickley et al.

,1997), there is definitely not a solitary ideal authority structure, two, two-way and prejudicial,

points of view, customary merchandise and bene. Therefore, the CEO's homestead is important for

certain individuals, however, the partition is most likely significant for other people. Thus, Boyd

(1995) has demonstrated that CEO duality can positively affect execution and a negative impact on

different conditions under certain industry conditions. Exact proof on the connection between CEO

duality and corporate execution has clear ends. For instance, (Biekpe, 2007) found an inspiration

between the CEO and double execution utilizing medium-sized medium-sized organizations in

Ghana. On the other hand, (Ehikioya ,2009) found that CEO duality cynicism ought not to

consolidate these robots (ie, choice administration and choice control) in a solitary position.




proposed that an auditor’s expectation gap (Beattie et al., 1998) exists. An audit desires gap is the

gap between the public perspective on what an auditor ought to do and the audit apparent

performance. Open enthusiasm for this expected gap is high because of later corporate

disappointments. 'Although an auditor might be truly significant to an owner, it would be

somewhat nearsighted for him not to know about the issues which the auditors can likewise make.

For what reason should it be clear that he should follow up in the interest of the owner of the

interests of the two parties are not indistinguishable?' (Ballwieser, 1987).

Andersen, the outside examiners (screens), was enlisted to speak to the interests of the principals

38

and lessen agency issues by expanding the information symmetry between principal and agent'

(Arnold and De Lange, 2004). In any case, the monitors ire prompting the agents on the best way to

control the information given to the principals (Culpan et al.,2005),

Agency theory expresses that the monitor ought to be autonomous of the agent and free

from irreconcilable circumstances with the organization and its operators however Andersen got

$52 million in expenses from Enron, half of which ire for counseling (Culpan et al., 2005). One

may address whether Andersen would direct an exhaustive audit of exchange that they effectively

affirmed (and for which they got a charge) earning their counseling caps' (Culpan and Trussel,

2005). Personal circumstance and the arrangement of the agents and monitor caused a full-scale

breakdown of the agency association with principals' stockholdings getting to be useless and the

downfall of both Enron and its monitors. The ICAEW (2005: 10) expresses that while the

principals of an association need to encage a nearby working association with the auditor to engage

an exhaustive audit. 'this cozy relationship has driven (and keeps on driving) investors to scrutinize

the apparent and real independence of auditors and to request harder control Panel data method and

gauges over independence to ensure them '. In light of the Enron model, (Arnold and De Lange,

2004) by and by the inquiry whether the division of proprietorship and control in modem

associations is a 'feasible establishment'. Antle's (1984) monetary model depends on agency theory

and gives the premise to the present study. Antle's model is the most generally alluded to agency

theory model (Kleinman et al, 1998). In Antle's model, the agents of the customer organization are

depicted as being exertion disinclined, not satisfying their obligation of riches expansion to the

principals. Be that as it may, _should the principals understand that the agents are not satisfying

their duties, there is a hazard that the agents was be supplanted or given a lower compensation. The

agents have a motivation to distort the organization's financial statement reports so as to trick the

principals into imagining that their wealth is being expanded. As the principals understand that the

agents may not carry on truly, the principals employ auditors so as to monitors the agents. In any

case, the agents can reward the monitors in the shape of a bribe to persuade the principals that the

agents are performing tasks appropriately. It is just the risk to the monitor notoriety which may

serve to keep the monitor honest. In numerous privately-owned companies, authors keep up their

initiative by filling in as ranking directors (CEO). The originators make an actual existence by

making employments for themselves. Likewise, with different businesspeople, there is a serious

requirement for progress among privately-owned company originators, which constrains them to

find creative thoughts and face determined challenges. As indicated by (Shaker A. Zahra, 2005),

the vast majority of the authors who additionally go about as CEOs have formal and casual forces

39

that permit them to assign the fundamental assets to find and execute promising thoughts in a

convenient way. Naturally, originators are more inventive than different administrators who tail

them in driving the association. These perceptions exhibit the accompanying speculation.

Agency scholars call attention to that proprietorship increments and a more noteworthy

concordance is accomplished between the proprietor and the firm (Fama and Jensen, 1983;

Mackling and Jensen, 1976). This harmonization happens when a family works together. The

proprietor urges them to improve their qualities. The property additionally enables the family to

advance thoughts for development and key change. These perceptions exhibit the accompanying

theory.

2.5 Ownership Concentration

The idea of an organization's ownership structure can influence execution. When all is said

in done, two sorts of property structures are talked about in the writing, ie thought and scattered. In

most created nations, while the ownership structure is crumbled, in creating nations the ownership

structure is exceptionally thought (ie a couple of investors have a huge extent of the offers given by

the rm), showing a powerless legitimate framework to secure the premiums of little speculators.

Specifically, square proprietors are probably going to be more effective than dispersed and little

investors in observing administration since they have the huge democratic capacity to ensure such

ventures also (Jensen and Mackling, 1976; Shleifer and Vishay, 1986). Then again, since they was

impart their expenses to different financial specialists, they can put an individual's assets in

ventures that are generally reasonable for their own advantages. Exact proof on the connection

between property concentration and execution of firm gives blended outcomes. For instance,

(Wiwattanakantang 2001) broke down information from 270 non-monetary records in Thailand. He

found that the pair of ownership was decidedly identified with bookkeeping based execution

measures (ie, return on resource and deals to-stock market proportion). (Yang et al. 2003) German

mining and broke down information of 361 information from assembling ventures. They found a

negative connection between ownership force and benefit of the program, as estimated by the

Attributes of corporate administration.

Families with enormous investors can likewise utilize their voices by forestalling or

attacking major changes that may alter the crucial key case of their organization (Shaker A. Zahra,

2005). Vital change is unsafe and requires noteworthy speculations to upgrade the organization's

way of life, forms and hierarchical structures (Shaker A. Zahra,2005). Organizations regularly need

to roll out these improvements with no assurance of money related achievement, as the portion of

family possession builds, it might be hard to help the major authoritative changes expected to

40

advance business enterprise, While the abundance of the family is intently attached to the

organization's future, all things considered, the craving to help radical changes (e.g. interests in

problematic and rising innovations or entering outside business sectors) is probably going to

decrease (Shaker A. Zahra, 2005).

Landowner administrators regularly incorporate other relatives inside the venture(Shaker

A. Zahra,2005) and this obligation empowers relatives to comprehend the serious difficulties and

openings confronting the organization. It additionally permits the family to investigate different

choices to talk about the dangers. One of the diligent difficulties looked by some privately-run

companies is the full interest of non-family laborers. At the point when relatives are vigorously

included, non-family laborers may feel denied of key choices and have little caution or opportunity

to act. These representatives should likewise experience relatives to help their thoughts. Privately-

run company representatives can't pull back and investigate business openings if they are not heard

enough. This detachment can cause some non-family workers to leave the organization - denying

the matter of a rich of advancement and the danger of enterprise. In this situation, family support

turns into an obstruction to fruitful adjustment rather than inadequate family laborers. These

perceptions lead to the accompanying elective theory. The study is typically focused by the

organization's CEO or senior official who has the most data about the organization's business and

vital activities (Zahra, 1991). The attention was on key administration exercises to limit the

deceptions of the members. Information from optional references was additionally used to approve

estimates created based on the poll. Duplicates of the first review. The two mailings gave 141

finished reactions and afterward coordinated the first CEO's reactions. As (Finkelstein et al. 1996)

watch, supervisors cause to notice altogether different pieces of the business condition. Character

and worth factors likewise lighten contrasts in observations, assessments, and convictions of the

official members.


in the literature devoted to corporate governance (Javid & Iqbal, 2008). The most critical division




systems, some of them commonly carry proprietary or external systems (Maher & Andersson,

2000)

According to (Abdullatif & Al-Khadash, 2010) that the corporate governance of Asian

41

companies is unproductive due to weak legal systems. (Omran et al.2008) showed that Jordan is

one of the countries with the highest ownership density. Family bookmarks take less risk than

family take but take less risk. I also believe that it is important to examine the outcome of this

behavior. Perhaps the most recurring theme among those interested in EO is related to the positive

effects of entrepreneurial processes on growth and performance (Lumpkin (Lumpkin and Dess

1996). Property and management mean that owners and managers are the same people or represent

the same owner family (Jensen and Mackling 1976).

Some characteristics of the Asian corporate governance mentioned in the literature include

a large level of overlap between concentrated ownership, broad family ownership, control family

ownership and management, significant cross-ownership relationships and pyramidal ownership

structure. The enormous stated that the state directly owns the influence of management

appointments, and finally the use of higher levels of management of professional managers

(Globerman et al., 2011). Some authors found that family-owned firms while involved in

entrepreneur activities take lesser risk than nonfamily firms (Naldi et al. 2007).





among stakeholders, particularly among shareholders and bondholders (Jensen &Mackling, 1976;




work for the company, and these companies, shareholders and their representatives are creating

potential for moral hazard problems. This separation was taking place from the authority

shareholders to the management which can manage the operation more effective (Monks et al.

2004).

Corporate ownership in my research includes the private and public ownership in the total

ownership structure. Corporate owners have dramatically increased their ownership in recent years,

and since 1992 they have controlled almost 50 percent of all paid-in equity (Smith, 1996).

Researchers argued that the increase in enterprise-level was associated with a decline in the

competitiveness and financial performance of US firms (Craves and Waddock, 1994). According to

this argument, this decline is partly due to the need for frequent and regular improved results of

42

corporate fund managers. Since their awards are based on quarterly results (Fortune, 1993; Craves

& Waddock, 1994), they earn short-term gains. In order to be responsive, firms have not been

managing top management for a long time or responding to various stakeholders, such as

communities, employees, the environment, and women and minorities.

In the recent past, the ownership structure has a worldwide problem for regulators,

organizations, many researchers and existing authorities in the accounting profession (Globerman

et al., 2011). The empirical and theoretical work on ownership affects firm performance and firm

value (Alkhawaldeh, 2012) and affects financial reporting quality proving that the ownership

structure is very important in companies. Moreover, (Demsetz and Lehn.1985) argue that block

holder ownership may lead to reduced management behavior at the discretion of management, to

engage the adoption of profitable strategies and to the disclosure of credible and relevant

information.

(Dong and Zhang, 2008) stated that the structure of ownership is one of the most critical

features of the corporate governance of the listed companies and that the structure affects the

boards of direct listed companies. In the meantime, (Al Masry et al. 2015)confirm the relationship

between internet-based reporting and the ownership structure of the firm.

Keep in mind that the relationship between growth opportunities and enterprise risk-taking

is still uncertain (John et al., 2008). Studies show that firms' wasingness to take a high risk by

making a profitable investment is the main long-term economic growth (John et al., 2008). An

empirical study among UK companies suggests that growth opportunities are associated with future

growth opportunities (Danbolt, Hirst, &Jone,2011).

Corporate strategic investment requires firms to provide resource for future growth

(Woolridge and Snow, 1990). High risk-taking by growth firms can create potential investment

opportunities for profit (Kogut and Kulatilaka, 1994). Growth opportunities are important and often

strengthen the competitive advantage of firms and become the central concerns of corporate

strategy (Woolridge and Snow, 1990). Corporate investment projects can be in internal or external

forms depending on the needs of firms. Firms can develop valuable resource for competitive

advantage, stock market accumulation within the company, and stock market acquisition from

outside the firm (Dierick and Cool, 1989). The external corporate investment includes joint

ventures and acquisitions, while external corporate investment includes new installations, advanced

technology, machine exchanges or product line expansion. Increasing demand in innovation

provides higher growth opportunities and competition to force managers to seek high-risk

43

investment projects to maximize shareholder wealth (Zingales, 2000). Competitiveness in the

industry encourage firms to have high growth opportunities as risk seekers from investment

projects (Pontiff,2004).

However, different researchers (Anderson et al., 2003) have found that the family unit

receiving unit has little diversity and is, therefore, riskier than non-family companies. In addition,

different aspects have been established in the literature on State-owned and private-owned

companies to distinguish between family and non-family close companies. (Iannotta et al. 2007)

selected an example of 181 banks from fifteen EU regions. They found that state-owned financial

institutions had poor credit quality compared to other financial institutions, such as personal and

mutual banks, in terms of performance and risk. Public banks have a higher risk and lower credit

quality than mutual banks. According to (Laeven, 1999), foreign banks are riskier than state-owned

banks, corporate and family businesses. Many studies (Gonzalez, 2005 and Laeven and Levine,

2009) have shown that deposit insurance, operational restrictions, capital regulations and the

protection of shareholders affect the flexibility of bank owners in taking risks. For example, deposit

insurance increases the flexibility and incentives of shareholders to increase risk (Keeley, 1990 and

Merton,1977).

(Hoi et al. 2013) documented the impact of administrative ownership on risk-taking by

Japanese and Korean banks. They concluded that advanced management ownership increased the

risk of Japanese banks and did not increase the overall risk of banks in Korea. (Chou and Lin,

2011) conducted a study to examine the impact of various types of ownership of banks on risk-

taking in Taiwan. They concluded that banks with high government ownership and high

managerial ownership ire at high risk and banks with high government ownership ire at a lower

risk. (Ianoatta et al. 2012) examined a large sample of European banks and claimed that state

ownership in banks positively correlated with operational risk and negatively associated with

default risk. (Hussain et al. 2018) made a decision about Spanish banks, where government banks

are taking higher risks. (Shleifer and Vishny, 1986) argued that external shareholders, such as

shareholders who have broad voting rights between blockage holders and institutions, have a

significant impact on bank risk. Although risk-taking is a central issue in research on warehousing

agencies, the deposit risk, who examine the relationship between management ownership and risk-

taking in the banking sector, and (Cebenoyan,1995), which examine the relationship between

ownership structure and bankruptcy risk (S & L). They review the large banks in 1985 in 1978, and

that shareholder-controlled banks (with high managerial equity positions) exhibit more risk-taking

behavior than manager-controlled banks (with low operating equity). positions between 1979 and

44

1982).

(Mintzberg, 1983) reveals two basic dimensions of the property. “Participation” (and

opposing “separation”) distinguishes between owners and non-owners who influence the decisions

or activities of the firm. 'Concentration' (and the opposite 'distribution') distinguishes between

companies whose stocks are closely held and those that are closely held. The cross-classification of

the two dimensions forms many types of property: dispersed - discrete, dispersed - included,

concentrated - separate and concentrated - included. The more interested the owners and the more

intense ownership they have, the bigger they have in influencing the company (Mintzberg, 1983).

Remaining companies prefer investment projects with high growth opportunities leading to the

company's highly unpredictable gains (Galai and Masulis, 1976). Increasing company risk

increases the shareholders' equity value at the same time and decreases the market risk against

shareholders. Firm growth is widely studied at both theoretical and empirical levels. According to

Gibrat law, the growth of firms is independent of firm size. Empirical studies show that firm size

and growth opportunities are rejected from the model, but few studies cannot be rejected for large

firms. It is widely accepted that not only the size and age but also the various strategies affect the

growth rate. It was not be possible to predict the use of existing and historical information about

the operations of firms that result in company growth, although it cannot be foreseen. Empirical

studies show that the data on corporate growth opportunity is systematic and unpredictable

(Geroski, Machin and Walters,1997).


in the literature devoted to corporate governance (Javid & Iqbal, 2008). The most critical division




systems, some of them commonly carry proprietary or external systems (Maher & Andersson,

2000)





among stakeholders, particularly among shareholders and bondholders (Jensen &Mackling, 1976;



45


work for the company, and these companies, shareholders and their representatives are creating the

potential for moral hazard problems. This separation was take place from the authority

shareholders to the management which can manage the operation more effectively (Monks

&Minow, 2003). (Dong and Zhang, 2008) stated that structure of ownership is one of the most

critical features of the corporate governance of the listed companies, and that the structure affects

the boards of direct listed companies Leverage.

Precisely when the cash has procured to use for theory and get an advantage on that

experience, it is known as leverage. The high degree of leverage gets unsafe relationship as

leverage manufactures the risk. Then again, high leverage was in like way develop the appearance

and preferred position of affiliation if the cash of leverage must be utilized reasonably. That is the

clarification, in different conditions, leverage is utilized to develop the focal points and to build the

money related nature of an affiliation. There are many conditions which are utilized to outline the

degrees of leverage.

• Relationship of critical worth and responsibility

• Effects on business yield and the leverage cycle.

• The relationship among industry and associates with entire leverage level and the

interrelationship between the current leverage degree and level of center leverage

• The crucial point of view of an affiliation which has an association with leverage.

The delayed consequence of leverage can be utilized to raise remuneration,

improvement, money related position and nature of an affiliation. The degree of

leverage degree is identified with interruption of favorable position and switch to

quality. High leverage level can change the benefits of an affiliation when showed

up contrastingly comparable to those affiliations which have increasingly modest

leverage level. (Smith, 2002) Corporation in entire world battles with different risks

in reliably outlines. The business dangers which are identified with associations are

as indicated by the going with.

• Foreign trade probability

• Credit hazard

• Market plausibility

• Political plausibility

• Environmental adequacy

• Systematic plausibility

46

These dangers are interrelated concerning levels of leverage and leverage degree as to an

increase in leverage also expands the risks. Be that as it may, basic yields can be polished by going

up against high challenges. Along these lines, It is a noteworthy test for the relationship to portray

the most over the top degree of threat for their affiliations.

Before long days, affiliations knew the hazard as for their division and express business. I

truth, each business put aside just from exertion to time data to face its own dangers and separate

various dangers from each other. The central risk which identified with leverage is called

Systematic hazard which is common to all possible possible liabilities or resource. Market chance

blueprints with the market and it can't be dispersed as though advance squashed, stock prices was

diminish. The relationship between worth return and hazard in leverage is gigantic. On the off

chance that the affiliation utilizes the moderate degree of leverage, the affiliation can deal with its

better allotting to dangers and can better utilize the leverage total.

The leverage can be surveyed by complete responsibility to imply regard yet two or three

liabilities as financing by banks and bonds are a result of financing. liabilities, it is financed in

financial institutions such as banks and capital markets. Inverse to it, affiliations can win benefit by

leverage by the ideal use of leverage total. The arrangement of use of liabilities is the bits of

noteworthy worth book respects. The assessment of yearly report confines speculator pay that starts

from the utilization of leverage aggregate. (Nissim and Penman, 2003).

2.6 Oil Prices

Oil prices are important for cash related bosses correspondingly as the entirety of the

associates of the market. Right now, oil prices are fundamental for both money related financial

bosses and for advance in perspective on two reasons. The first explanation is that a significant lot

of choices and engineering are made by clients and makers, they consider the oil price fluctuations.

A second explanation is that investors' choices are affected by rehearses which are oil-related and

the association of threat is in like way impacted by oil prices. Under these reasons, oil prices are

vital for all associates for organizing, contributing, basic organization and for use, imparted that the

generation of complete items and adventures and affiliations efficiency is impacted by changes of

oil prices when policymakers make moves close. In spite of it, oil price fluctuations in addition

give chance level data and the turnover of favorable circumstances concerning oil changes as the

adjustments in oil prices are astoundingly delicate to budgetary choices which are identified with

oil prices and choices about the danger the heads and choices about energy for portfolios. This

47

shows budgetary masters can competently contribute and deal with their portfolios by oil prices

shakiness information. (Kroner et al., 1995). By these outcomes, different specialists have

discovered the improvement of oil prices because of their macroeconomic effects on the national

economy and money related trades. The appraisal of oil price changes is about the impact of

macroeconomic factors on the money related trades. (Karaca and Eksi 2012)) states that as oil is

the colossal piece of duty of different associations, by then the rising oil prices brought the perilous

condition for economy by extension and high joblessness. (Karaca and Eksi 2012) recognize that

developing oil prices go about as expanding commitment and purchasers look at for substitution of

centrality assets also as danger and uniqueness builds which cut back stock price. By utilizing

multifactorial model of alert, insistences shows that the danger of oil prices influence the

protections trade gainfulness in rising market by allowing all threat factors. Different appraisals set

up a relationship among oil prices lead and macroeconomic factors frameworks, barely any

examination paper contemplated the relationship between oil price immediate and stock.

2.7 GDP

An American researcher was first given the possibility of hard and fast national yield

(GDP) during the 1930s. Total national output is isolated as the full-scale market worth of each

completed thing and services which are produced in a zone in a given timespan. It is a fundamental

factor in full-scale money-related issues in which all creation, pay and use structure is considered at

national fiscal level. During the 1990s, HDI (Human Development Index) was suggested by

UNDP. To decide the entire arcade worth all officially checked completed things and cordialities

framed in a zone in a required time range is gotten GDP and it takes out worth provisional material

in the strategy of age. GDP is exactingly associated with Gross national pay and gross national

thing. The degree of GDP portrays by its district and a while later again, GNP and GNI delineate

its range and region by its ownership or its regard to nations.

GDP is creation encompassed inside a nation's edges in a destined time and joins the value

passed on by both family and outside inhabitants in a specific zone. GNP is a thing passed on by

endeavors constrained by a nation's occupants in a given time and combines all the worth made by

its tenants both at home and abroad, and despite the worth made by remote inhabitants who

remains in the nation. GNI recommends mean compensation picked up by occupants of a nation in

a given period, (for example, a year), including its tenants' private pay and net fundamental pay

from abroad(Yannis et al. 2014).

Total national output and its task individual, GNP (starting now and into the not all that

48

inaccessible, the clarification "Full scale national yield" was be used just, notwithstanding the way

where that the terms truly used as somewhat of an enormous part of the going with references are

either "GNP" or "national compensation"), have been considered along in a general sense

equivalent lines following their start. As outlined in its latest confirmed definition (in the 1993

United Nation System of National Account (SNA), GDP may obviously be examined as many

proportionate totals: (a) last outcomes at business district expenses of the creation improvement of

inhabitant producer units; (b) net quality included to be unequivocal, depicted as the division in

yield and moderate use; (c) last occupations of things and affiliations (all except for midway use)

assessed in purchasers' costs, less the estimation of imports of thing and affiliations; and (d) head

employments dispersed by occupant creator units. Predicting an issue that was soon to face, and

which has addressed a potential danger down the periods straight up until today. In 2010, Chinese

specialists gave the likelihood of HDIN which shows the new term of Human Development Index.

It is a once-over it proposed the level of human improvement in the mechanical and data age.

In a given timespan, GDP made in a nation and the worth given to it by close by and remote

individuals in a fated time portion. (Brussel, 2012). The nation's money related famishing is

checked by GDP for over fifty years. Every single last fantastic and association which is shaped in

a fated timespan is called GDP. Total national output is directed by suppositions and layout

information which is set up in a nation's System of National Account (SNA). Which contain

budgetary quantifiable information that is assembled after standard between times. Total national

output is settled on the yearly and quarterly explanations which are depended upon to gather the

information fiscally. (Marcuss and Kane 2007). The estimation of GDP produces the discharge

trademark assets past what they can improve and recover themselves. Another perspective is that

advancing money related movement is exhausting characteristic structures, that is the clarification

diminishing the associations that given to people futile. It is a degree of prospering which is known

as the 'edge influence.' By the ascending of GDP, way of life was in like way increments. With the

expansion of GDP, it is repaid with the usages which are related to compensation lopsidedness,

reducing of capital lessening and satisfaction time. There are different segments of GDP.

Legitimately off the bat, GDP can uncover the money related size of a region. Moreover, the pace

of advancement of GDP and GDP per capita can reveal grouping and changeability of economy of

nation. Third, GDP can be utilized to explore making the relationship of the family economy, much

proportional to the erections of agribusiness, industry and tertiary industry. GDP can utilize to

explore the winning relationship of the national remuneration. (Brussels,2012).

49

2.8 Inflation

The expression inflation, which is utilized by market analysts to show rising prices, is

clarified as far as cash. The measure of inflation or inflation rate is characterized as the yearly pace

of progress in cash prices. Along these lines, inflation diminishes the obtaining power in the

money. (White, 2000) by and by portrayed inflation as expanding the volume of parasitic without

relating to an expansion in the money request. The definition and meaning of mikes and expanding

can be clarified with three outcomes. To start with, inflation is characterized as an augmentation of

Misses' and Austrian cash theory and market request that matches cash to be an item

simultaneously. It is hard to state that ought to be inflation when countless individuals might want

to change over a portion of their gold enhancements into monetary standards, however, and, after

it’s all said and done, it has brought the money to market and veered off from comparative

qualities. For this situation, individuals cash holding increases, so expanding the quantity of cash

doesn't surpass the expanding requests for cash. Each ascent in the cash, and the inflationary,

characterizes the start of the money, as clarified by Caarl Minger's theory. Cash can be utilized as

something and has such a component, that is perceived and acknowledged on an enormous scale,

and comparably any product can be cash at different occasions in different spots. On the off chance

that this announcement should be comprehended, it was characterizing that the item can be utilized

as money for the indent in which they live. Second, inflation has numerous damaging

ramifications, however, on the off chance that it is considered as a solid way of thinking, these

awful and ruinous implications are overlooked. The capacity to purchase words isn't as damaging

as it isn't ruinous, however, the inflation is considered as a unsafe things. (Kochanowski, 2009)

Inflation means rising price of everything and administrations in an economy. It is

additionally characterized as the total rising prices wherein individuals' buying power decreases

with the increase in average cost of basic items. It implies the expansion in the prices of

merchandise and ventures called inflation. It is perceived as a significant economic factor in both

created and creating nations. There are numerous explanations for inflation. Thusly, there are

various Panel data method of an economic idea in which financial specialists attempt to investigate

this factor corresponding to other many macroeconomic factors. The significance of regarding

inflation as a macroeconomic factor is characterized by the capacity of a nation to show its

economic balance and the administration's control of inflation through money related and financial

approaches. Furthermore, inflation can give a thought regarding the nation's exchange arrangement.

Inflation rates change in various times and in various monetary standards. The inflation rate

50

estimated in the US since 1950 has changed in various years. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) go

improved from - 0.7% to 13.3% from 1954-1979. At that point in 1991, this rate stayed consistent

at 1.6% and 3.3% every year. In the present years, the Japanese CPI indicated a negative inflation

pace of 1% every year. Albeit silver and highest quality levels are confronted with inflation, silver,

and gold-based inflation rates ascend to 2 percent for every year, except all-out inflation in these

nations is near zero, while paper cash principles measurements show more inflation. Diminish)

discovers that in the ninetieth century, inflation was augmented in nations where metallic principles

didn't last any longer. Despite the fact that the nations they need to forestall hyperinflation, yet

inflation rates despite everything expanded after 1971.

2.9 Size of a Firm

Firm size can't be depicting still today. The firm size can be conveyed as the purpose of

repression of firms regarding age, deals and concerning their monetary position. Firm size can be

delineated by multi-dimensional ways as parts which are utilized to depict firm size are different.

The idea and qualities of firm size beginnings from outside bookkeeping. The size and

advancement are related in the situation of present-day money related issues as explicit hypotheses

prescribe that money related improvement creates the fiscal improvement and this thing is speedier

of high improvement firms when wandered from little improvement firms. Humbler firms bear

burden in accomplishing propels and recognize when separated for gigantic firms due to goliath

obstacles and tremendous cost which are required to acquire leverage. On the opposite, money

related improvement can have a useful result on littler firms (Banerjee and Newman 1993). In

converse, some examination showed that little advancement firms unequivocally in under make

nations, they don't have the capacity to shoulder money related associations, that is the clarification

budgetary improvement give more piece of elbowroom to high improvement firms (Greenwood

and Jovanovic, 1990). Insignificant size firms can develop much better by going into ways.

• Seminars regarding budgetary improvement and money related.

• Strategies through which money related improvement can acknowledge work being

developed of the economy.

• Strategic approaches that lift the little firms to make an impact budgetary

improvement.

Regarding frameworks, the World Bank (2002, 2004) proposes that improvement of little

firms' augmentations than colossal size firms by headway, going toward rivalry and giving work on

a tremendous level over the most recent five years for broadening insignificant size firms. Many

51

research give sees that record is related to the improvement of the economy by the execution of the

methodology of advancement and fiscal progress by giving information.

There are strategically repercussions of money related movement considering the firm size

that financial improvement can improve insignificant size firms or epic size firms and what has the

impact of budgetary progress. Toward the end, the firm size of an industry can be depicted by its

advances of age and economy of scale. (Kumar, Rajan, and Zingales, 2001).

2.10 Profitability

The word productivity is made out of the two words, explicitly, favored position and cutoff.

The term advantage has been explained above and quite far shows the power of a business

fragment to get the benefits. The limit of might other than displays its gaining power or working

execution. The advantage may be portrayed as the purpose of repression of an offered set out to

win an appearance from its use. The favored position is a relative thought at any rate advantage is a

flat out the essence. In spite of being immovably related to and for the most part, related, piece of

elbowroom and productivity are two outstanding thoughts. Considering, paying little notification to

their nonexclusive nature, all of them have an unquestionable part in a business. As a level out a

term, advantage has no criticalness to take a gander at the limit of business affiliation. A high great

position doesn't for the most part show sound unique limit and low viability isn't typically a sign of

a certifiable issue. In this manner, it may be said that the favored position isn't the prime variable

on the clarification of which the operational capacity and budgetary viability of a partnership can

be looked at. To survey the ampleness of capital used and to check operational gainfulness,

effectiveness appraisal is considered as probably the best way of thinking. (Tulsian, 2014).The

farthest point of an alliance, task, affiliation, and firm to take advantage of utilizing all business

assets and by doing all cutoff points and techniques is called gainfulness. It delineates the

association proficiency to take advantage by utilizing each astute development which exists in

pitch. In like way, the benefit is the possibility of an office to get advantage by its utilization. The

word productivity isn't enjoyed capacity considering how the gainfulness supposedly measures the

firm and business proficiency and this practicality can be stretched out by the movement of the

board. As the gainfulness is utilized to assess firm ampleness yet isn't a preposterous affirmation of

ability. It occurs in explicit conditions that even a firm is expanding sensible points of interest yet

at the same time it is return as wasteful and in, all things considered, a beneficial firm isn't winning

a striking favorable position. The net bit of leeway depicts the multifaceted nature among

occupations and costs. In the event that the proficiency of a firm changes, it is a result of just one

52

factor and that is the one on which benefit of a firm is staggeringly reliant. There are different

segments that influence the products other than that of feasibility. In those parts, getting per share

(EPS) is return as the crucial and all-around fundamental to check the association's productivity

and a degree of a firm benefit. Some people appeared in his examination paper that EPS is the best

picking portion in advance a spark by thinking about the particular track. That is the clarification

analysts considered the EPS factor when they need to pick about their undertaking. (Al-Shubiri and

Management 2010) executed the assessment by taking a lose the faith evaluation and gave results

that market price of offer and resource respect per share is tenaciously related. As requirements are,

he gave the results that both microeconomic and macroeconomic parts have sway on the stock

price. (Al-Shubiri and Management 2010)explored that stock prices recall the choice for workers to

contribute to a stock that is near nothing. They appeared with affirmations that the protections trade

move with the investment opportunity of a worker to scarcely think about the expenses. (Al-Shubiri

and Management 2010) also depicted the stock price expects as per warrant surveying system is

littler when stood apart from normal valuation methodology and closer to authentic stock price.

2.11 Relationship between Variables

2.12.1 Stock Price

The current writing contains nitty-gritty investigations which ire applied to test the

connection among macroeconomic factors and microeconomic factors with stock returns. It is

regularly seen that stock prices was, in general, vary with economic news and this perception is

upheld by exact proof demonstrating that macroeconomic factors have informative force on stock

returns (Er and Vuran, 2012). For this situation, the stock price is the selling price of an offer

among the financial specialists. Stock prices utilized to depend on the offer price of each

organization's end stock price toward the year's end. (Astutik.et.al.2014) Like that of some other

budgetary stock market, the price of stock compares the present estimation of the flood of future

money installments to the proprietor. Investor's money installments are dubious and subject to the

gaining and execution of the firm (Khan, 2014). In rising stock markets, the exchanging design

stock market is day-exchanging. This sort of exchange is theoretical in nature. To boost the

addition from exchange they ordinarily think about the two kinds of components. Right off the bat,

the essential factors that are the degree of the income base, and a valuation different, expected

growth in the profit base, markdown rate, and danger of the stock.

2.12.2 Relationship of CEO Duality with Stock Price

The duality of CEO is various in a couple of adventures of Pakistan. Solid piece of Pakistan

53

has 21% CEO Duality in associations. Past composing delineated that more firms for all intents and

purposes 63% from the sugar have a duality of CEO. Amasses did in the past found that CEO

duality constrains the operational introduction of associations. President duality is astoundingly

typical in the sugar industry and solid relationship of Pakistan. The capability of working activities

is investigated through two factors that are Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE).

Disclosures of the assessment explain that the duality of the CEO limits the budgetary execution of

solid zone and sugar in some portion of Pakistan. Disregarding the way that, assessing through

Tobin's Q, associations of sugar part sway associations in the solid zone that express trust of

theorists at sugar associations, thusly, giving a higher impetus to those associations (Nazir et al.,

2009).

As showed by (Abdullah 2006) a plenitude of financial specialists can be redesigned if

associations can have separate individuals at the post of CEO and executive. To take a gander at

the effect of CEO duality on money related execution of associations study aggregate data from

PSE recorded associations and study period was from 1994 to 1996. The research took the data of

these years in light of the fact that Corporate Governance was not seen as a basic instrument in that

range. In Malaysia, most firms ire not having twofold sort sheets that show there are two particular

individuals at the circumstance of CEO and Chairman of the firm. Disclosures of the study suggest

that there is no relationship among budgetary execution of affiliation and CEO duality.

Examination of (Crossland and Hambrick 2007) assembled data of hundred German associations

for 15 years and this was stood out from 100 United State associations and 100 Japanese

associations through the distinction assessment approach. Disclosures of the assessment prescribe

that the effect of the duality of CEO at execution of firms was loir in German and Japanese

associations instead of U.S associations. As showed by (Cooper, 2009), the duality of CEO and

execution of bank is a reducing wonder. Study checks the display of financial institutions such as

banks by using fiscal measures, for instance, Tobin's Q, Economic Value Added or MVA.

Research finished by (Griffith et al., 2002) fought that twofold circumstance of CEO doesn't have

any significant bearing essential impact on the execution of relationship considering the way that

with the extension in obligations, capacities of CEO does exclude improvement in execution.

CEO duality — the act of a solitary individual filling in as both CEO and board seat—is

one of the most broadly examined corporate administration wonders (Dalton, Hitt, Certo, and

Dalton, 2007).

2.12.3. Relationship of Ownership Concentration with a Stock Price

It alludes to the measure of stock claimed by singular financial specialists and enormous

54

square investors (speculators that hold in any event 5 percent of value ownership inside the firm).

What's more, most of the occasions it identifies with stock price supposing that a solitary

individual holds the stock then the stockpile was diminish and a request was increment and at last,

the stock price was begin to increment.

(Mills et al. 2005) looked at the income consciousness of twofold class firms with single-

class firms. Twofold class firms increment their motivating forces for the seizure of their offers

and the worth they get from minority investors by permitting controlling investors to have to cast

ballot rights with less value ownership. They think income is less useful for double class firms than

for single-class firms. This is predictable with the possibility that the detachment of casting a ballot

rights and income rights urges investors to control outside an incentive from minority investors.

Thus, (Boubaker et al. 2011) found that income informatics was contrarily connected with over the

top control of controlling investors; this show controlling investors have more motivators to shroud

bookkeeping figures when there is a plausibility of seizure. They additionally found that the

nearness of beyond what one significant investor could decrease this issue and bring issues to light

of profit.

(Warfield et al. 1995) gave a clarification under an agency system and inspected the

connection between administrative ownership and profit mindfulness. They contend that low

administrative ownership is related to a stricter agreement dependent on bookkeeping data. This

gives chiefs motivations to apply prudence inside the extent of bookkeeping principles in their

money related reports. High regulatory ownership adjusts the interests of directors to those of

investors and makes a tight agreement superfluous. They found that the consciousness of income

was decidedly identified with authoritative property predictable with this exposure.

Notwithstanding the articles talked about above, past examinations investigate the

connection between ownership structures and income mindfulness in various nations. (Bae and

Jeong,2007) found that profit ire less significant for Korean firms associated with business

gatherings. They additionally found that cross-value ownership diminishes the worth pertinence,

while outside ownership builds the worth importance. (Kwak and Armitage, 2009) explore the

connection between corporate ownership and the nature of money related data for Japanese firms.

They found that corporate ownership was emphatically connected with income mindfulness. Bona-

Sánchez et al. (2014) analyzed the impact of political ties on profit mindfulness in Spain and found

that the nearness of lawmakers on the board contrarily influenced income mindfulness. They

additionally found that the separation between controlling investors' democratic rights and income

55

rights positively affected the comprehension of profit in politically partnered firms.

An important writing survey looks at the connection between institutional qualities and

profit mindfulness. (DeFond et al. 2007) saw profit declarations as increasingly instructive in

nations with better insider exchanging laws and more grounded financial specialist security

foundations. The outcomes show that better speculator security positively affects income

mindfulness. (Haw et al. 2004) archives that profit the executives are fundamentally loir in nations

with better minority investor security.

More recent studies include investigating the impact of joint ownership on barriers to

market entry in the pharmaceutical sector (Newham et al., 2018). This study found that a standard

deviation increase in joint ownership reduced the probability of market entry by generic

pharmaceutical companies by 9-13%. Another study found that firms owned by large institutional

investors ire more likely to experience mergers or acquisitions (Brooks et al., 2018). And in

another study, researchers found that when higher levels of joint ownership ire higher, voluntary

disclosure among firms was greater, suggesting iak competition that reduced disclosure costs and

improved coordination between firms (Pawliczek and Skinner, 2018). Besides, (Gutiérrez and

Philippon 2016) found that commonly owned and concentrated industries invest less and may

undermine innovation.

While most of these studies investigate potential negative outcomes from common

ownership, some studies have found potentially positive results, such as improved innovation

expectation among firms, provided that there are positive spreads between firms in the sector

(López and Vives, 2017). (Appel et al. 2016) found that the passive investment made by large

asset management firms is not equal to free ownership.

Concentration to combine horizontal joint ventures and partial ownership of firms by

competitors (Salop and O’Brien, 2000), although theoretically attractive, this measure can lead to

adverse causality problems in empirical studies that predict the impact of joint ownership on

prices, ie not only does an increase in joint ownership levels lead to higher prices but also higher

prices as ill as common owners measured by the MHHI delta. Increase investment in joint-

ownership companies by increasing the level of ownership concentration (Rock and Rubinfeld,

2017). Most researchers have acknowledged the potential of this problem and have taken measures

to mitigate their impact on their methods. However, critics are still questioning whether these

methods adequately eliminate the potential for two-way causal relationships. Some have based

their critics on the appropriateness of instrumental variables.

56

Critics of these empirical studies indicated that, for example, the findings in the airline

sector cannot be repeated in other sectors because the airline industry is already oligopolistic with

high entry barriers (He and Huang, 2017). Others have warned that given the remaining questions

regarding the findings, methods, and reproducibility of these experimental studies, they should not

over-rush to change merger arrangements to take account of the potential impacts of joint

ownership (Rock and Rubenfeld, 2017). (Elhauge, 2018) has provided a strong defense of the

findings of original studies on airlines and banking, but their criticism suggests that either these

studies contradict existing evidence or actually strengthen price effects, original studies.

2.12.4 Leverage and Stock Price:

Leverage has contrarily relationship with the stock price. It implies that when part of the

obligation in the all-out value expanded then ymy leverage expanded, and stock prices diminished.

High leverage is a negative sign for the firms. To take a moderate degree of leverage firms to make

various arrangements. In this respect my outcomes Panel data method. The leverage impact is that

stock shakiness is identified with stock returns, where stock eccentrics was in general increment

when stock costs fall. There are two ordinary money related divulgences for the impact. The

primary clarification relies upon the relationship in unusualness and anticipated returns. At where

capriciousness expanded, it was anticipated that the benefit propensity would increment and cause

a decline in the stock price. Accordingly, flightiness and stock returns negate one another. The

subsequent clarification relies upon the budgetary impact. At where stock costs fall, impact builds

the budgetary impact and expands the unusualness of stock returns. There is no concurrence on the

impacts of monetary impact on stock unusualness. Accurate examinations assessing the impact

have yielded blended outcomes, yet these investigations face a few difficulties. Any examination

concerning the impact of monetary impact on unsteadiness should profit by advertise obligation

valuations that are hard to get alone. Observational composing likewise does exclude a speculative

rule for dependable asset changes with various parts of advantage valuation data in the vicinity of

both obligation and worth cases. (Ayedmeyer and Hollifield, 2007). (Chang et al. 2009) grow and

build up the model to discover quantifiable surprising outcomes for every one of the determinants.

Notwithstanding the previously mentioned inclinations, an enormous number of huge

associations, for example, Microsoft, Vestas, or an amazing number of pharmaceutical

organizations, extensively decrease their degree of obligation; this is a decision that battles with the

recommendations of the static change theory.

Target change, all the more progressively, shows that associations step by step change their

capital structures to a goal level, which is a part of various inward and outside components that

57

change sooner or later. (Clark et al. 2009) attempt to comprehend whether firms really change to a

target capital structure, and spotlight on 26,395 firms from 40 nations to find proof supporting the

dynamic change speculation for capital structure. What's more, they think about the speed of

progress on enormous instances of information and find logical inconsistencies amidst made and

made countries. (Pinegar and Lease, 986) explore the impacts of institutional structure changes that

don't have any assignment related impact, for instance, exchange from looked to normal stock.

Their theory is that these exchanges despite everything influence the nature of the idea because of

the thought of checking or association costs. They found that after such affirmations, the business

area anticipated increments in esteem. Along these lines, the theory of stamping proposed by

(Leland and Pyle, 1977) has been appeared to influence the reaction of the business division, in

spite of the fact that the exchanges don't influence the evaluation of the giving substance at any

limit.

(Eckbo 1986) explores 723 commitment propositions and looks to comprehend what

impacts there are on-offered costs. The theory predicts that enlarging the degree of obligation was

decidedly influence the valuation of the association's offers. As it might be, the outcomes don't

Panel data methodter this depiction. Notwithstanding the rejection of a level or convertible

commitment, there is no solid positive connection among offers and existing benefits.

Notwithstanding a little sub-case of open help contributions, each analyzed offer brought zero odd

returns. Regardless, the impediment of such an investigation is, that it doesn't speak to whether

modifications in the capital structure are made over a short or long separation. The last is accepted

to have impacts on valuation, and the assemblage of the two classes thusly might be the motivation

behind vague outcomes.

As indicated (Eckbo 1986) orders associations as determined at the specific risk levels, yet

just makes 3 pack: low, medium and high danger. The survey presents two principle disclosures:

first, associations seem to have target capital conduct in every one of the three risk packages, and

are likewise firmly connected to the long haul - non-transitory - commitment and the estimation of

the business part. It additionally analyzes the impact of different gatherings on the three gatherings

and finds various outcomes at each gathering. The determinants that influence showcase esteems

for every one of the three-risk gathering is the objective obligation proportion, the liquidity

position and the credit charge. Expect that the capital structure has all the entering impact if the

danger level goes higher.

(Muradoglu and Sivaprasad 2006) endeavored to talk about the issue with strange benefits

and to endeavor for a monetary master to manage commitments for different danger classes.

58

Considering the 4-digit industry portrayal codes, they assemble 792 associations into 9 classes and

embrace their further commitments. They at that point attempt to decide whether the joined strange

returns of the stock are characterized by the degree of responsibility. The outcomes got from the

assessments show that, when the risk levels fall, the phenomenal returns abatement to a huge

degree. They found that if the impact was utilized as a change method and an examiner put assets

in the most reduced impact firms with an ordinary risk iight of 0.23%, the budgetary master would

have an unprecedented return limit of 6.28% altogether. One year's chance during the 24- year look

into period and a lot of 491%.

(Carpentier, 2006) considers the long-term impact of changes in capital structure on firm

regard for the French business area. His article was one of the first to propose a prompt test for a

recommendation of unimportance. In 1987 and 1996 he utilized a case of 243 French associations

over a time of 10 years. It found that the extensions and diminishes originating from borrower

levels have both positive and negative impacts on firm regard. Therefore, Modigliani and Miller's

capital structure can't disregard the recommendation of repetition.

The contextual analysis composing likewise addresses business segment reactions to

affirmations of capital structure change (ie, esteem explanations or long haul obligation).

(Loughran and Ritter, 1995) discovered negative reactions extending from 30% to half inside 5

years after the valuation. This is by the talk of checking, which expresses that associations esteem

just the opportunity to comprehend that their offers are misrepresented. Accordingly, rational

monetary specialists are changing stock conclusions.

(Dichev et al. 1999)found that the straight-obligation issues don't show unordinary return,

utilizing every single quantifiable test that can be additionally balanced for the 5-year time frame

after the presentation. Similarly, the foundations that convertible risk, in a similar period, they

didn't meet the desires for the business line, this proportion is resolved that the relative obligation.

In a few investigations, Graham altogether inspected ecological commitment rates and tax

reductions of commitments and found that capital structure was significant. In Graham (1996), he

built up an innovative procedure to decide the least cost rates utilizing recorded assessment reports

from associations. (Graham, 2000) assesses the quality left by an association on the table as very

conventionalist and without applying every one of the upsides of the commitment and finds that the

ordinary firm can have up to double the base pre-charge obligation measure. they begin to decay

and they have the ability to make benefits from 15% of the organization's regard. This arrangement

of speculations displays various assortments by focusing on various segments. Various papers have

a progressively explicit focus(Graham, 2000).

59

One of the resulting examinations, including outside trade cost, the Hennessy and Whited

model (2005). They endeavor to give a few bits of knowledge into the interrelationships of

conviction that can't be clarified by static trade models, for instance, a view amidst an advantage

and measurement and a degree of other commitment. As in (Brennan and Schwartz, 1984),

hypothesis and financing choices are interior, yet in the present case, the decisions are normal. The

model likewise incorporates singular compensations for graduate pay rates, intrigue installments

and benefits, money related torment costs just as worth buoyancy costs. They find that it has no

goal impact. In addition, they show that past commitment levels influence exit.

2.12.5 Relationship of Leverage with Stock Price

The leverage is comprised of the perpetual costs in the rundown of the organization's costs.

This leverage relies upon the perpetual monetary costs like the expansion of the advances; this

issue assumes a significant job in figuring the benefit before charges as ill as the benefit of every

one of the organization's offers (Namazi and Khajavi, 2004). (Hussain and Gul, 2011) have done an

examination in concrete industry in Pakistan's stock market; their point was to decide the

relationship between the stock price and the capital structure. (Bagherzade, 2005) have dissected

the components which influence the offer's benefit in stock market. His discoveries demonstrated

that there is a direct positive relationship between the precise hazard and the benefit of the stock

(Hussain and Gul, 2011) have done an exploration named changes of the leverage, the obligation

bend and the stock worth. They have arrived at this resolution that the progressions of the leverage

was convey new data to the market about the estimation of the stock offer. They have likewise

confirmed that there is a negative relationship between changes in the leverage and the stock offer

prices. At the point when cash is obtained to utilize it for a venture and make a benefit from it, it is

called leverage. As the leverage proportion expands the hazard, the high leverage proportion is

unsafe for the organization. Then again, if leverage cash should be utilized objectively, high

leverage was expand an organization's arrival and benefit. Consequently, by and large, leverage is

utilized to expand an organization's benefit and increment its budgetary quality. There are many

conditions used to characterize leverage levels.

• Equity and obligation

• Impacts on working yield and switch cycle.

• The relationship between the whole leverage level between the business and the

organization and the present leverage proportion and the medium leverage level.

• The strategic way of thinking of an organization that is connected to leverage. The

leverage item can be utilized to build an organization's income, growth, budgetary

60

position and force. The proportion of leverage is identified with the deviation of

benefit and something contrary to security. A high leverage level can change an

organization's benefit contrasted with organizations with a loir leverage level.

(Smith, 2002) Companies the world over contend with numerous dangers in their

day by day forms. Business dangers identified with organizations are as per the

following.

• Foreign trade hazard

• Credit chance

• Market chance

• Political hazard

• Environmental steadiness

• Systematic hazard

Since the expansion in leverage expands the dangers, these dangers are related to leverage

and leverage proportions. Albeit significant yields can be accomplished by facing higher

challenges. Accordingly, it is a significant test for organizations to characterize the most extreme

degree of hazard for their business.

Today, organizations realized the dangers related with their divisions and organizations.

Truth be told, each business once in a while gets data to confront its own dangers and separate

between various dangers. The regular hazard related with leverage known as the Systematic hazard,

which is basic to all liabilities or resource. Market hazard manages the market and can't be

appropriated as though the market has been demolished, stock price was fall. The relationship

between return on value and leverage chance is significant. In the event that the organization

utilizes a moderate leverage level, the organization can deal with its better designation of dangers

and utilize the leverage sum better. (Bhatti, 2010).

Leverage can be estimated by an absolute obligation to add up to value, yet a few payables

financed by banks and bonds stem just from financing. Different commitments to complete the

exercises of various livelihoods from various people, for example, annuity, exchange, maker,

purchaser, client and provider. It is financed in capital markets to fund liabilities or to contribute.

Conversely, organizations can make benefit from leverage with the ideal utilization of leverage.

The way toward utilizing liabilities is a piece of the value book esteems. The examination of the

yearly report isolates the stock increases emerging from the utilization of the leverage sum.

(Nissim and Penman,2003).

2.12.6 Relationship of Oil Prices with Stock Price

61

In the field composing, there are different examinations with various revelations that

consider the connection between oil expenses and stock returns. (Sadorsky 1999)analyzed the

connection between the tricks in oil expenses and stock market exchanging the USA. Because of

the investigation, among VAR and GARCH inquires about, which are associated with one another

and consolidating credit cost and mechanical creation return, it is uncovered that the oil costs and

the unconventionality of oil costs assume a significant job in the impact between 1947-1996. the

benefits of stocks and staggered vacillations in oil costs have strayed from the economy. In his

investigation, (Sadorsky 1999)inspected the dynamic connection between oil esteem staggers,

stock exchanging (stock expenses) and fiscal activities (credit compensation, work) in Greece.

Because of the investigation directed between 1989-1999 and during the period when the VAR

study was connected, it was resolved that the amendments in oil costs influenced the genuine fiscal

activities and that they ire fundamental factors in considering the stock worth estimations of the oil.

cost. In his examination, (Maghyereh, 2004) researched the correspondence between paralyzes in

oil costs and the stock trade of relevant countries. As per the aftereffects of the examination, dazes

in oil costs have no critical impact on the stock returns of the making countries. (Lise and Van

Montfort 2007) analyzed the connection between unrefined petroleum esteem, stock return,

advance expense and return in the time of 1987-2004 inside the extent of the Istanbul Stock

Exchange (ISE). As shown by the consequences of the audit, shocks in oil costs didn't significantly

affect stock returns. In their examination, (Anoruo and Mustafa, 2007) inspected the connection

between the oil and stock trade returns in the USA in the period 1993-2006. As showed by the

impact of the examination utilizing the co-reconciliation test and the VECM model, it worked out

that there was a long haul relationship (co-combination) between the stock trade and the oil

showcase, and the arrival from the trade to the profits of the oil advertise was a constrained causal

relationship. (Park and Ratti, 2008) examined the impact of paralyzes in oil costs on stock

exchanging restores the US in 13 European nations. In the examination led for the period 1986-

2005 utilizing the VAR model, the stock exchange returns of the expense paralyzes acknowledged

in all structures, the expansion in the oil cost in Norway and subsequently the stock exchange

returns and the stock exchange returns of the precariousness the oil costs in numerous European

nations with the exception of the US has had a negative impact. In their revelations, (Cong, Ii, Jiao,

and Fan, 2008) broke down the insightful connection between oil costs in China and the staggers

in the stock trade. In the period between 1996-2007 and utilizing the VAR model, it was discovered

that staggers in oil costs didn't significantly affect stock returns and that some basic dazes didn't

influence the inventory of oil organizations. Plant administrator and (Ratti, 2009) analyzed the

62

long-separation connection between world grungy oil expenses and widespread stock exchange. In

the 1971-2008 period (isolated in the light of periods), it was seen that there was a long separation

connection between the factors, as showed by the consequences of the investigation directed inside

the extent of OECD nations utilizing the VECM model. During the 1971-1980 and 1988-1999

periods, and over the long haul of the stock market exchange, it had responded emphatically to the

extension of oil costs.

(Arouri et al. 2010) broke down the connection between oil costs and staggers in stock returns

utilizing immediate and lopsided models between oil exchanging nations the period 2005-2008. As

per the aftereffects of the investigation, stock returns in Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the United

Arab Emirates respond to changes in oil costs, yet the adjustments in oil prices in Bahrain and

Kuwait.

Changes in oil esteem have considered both cash experts and business division individuals

for two reasons. To start with, they altogether impact the decisions made by makers and customers

in key guideline and endeavor tests. They likewise settle on the decision of budgetary specialists

for oil-related activities, portfolio disseminations and extra possibility the executives. Considering

these impacts, the ability to completely anticipate changes in oil esteem is vital to the essential

initiative in the money related locale. In like manner, (Arouni et al. 2012,), "All out yield elements

and institutional increases may likewise be seriously influenced, and approach producers should

consider the instability impacts of oil prices in economic strategies. It is additionally essential to

precisely display and foresee oil price unpredictability, particularly for budgetary choices including

oil speculations and portfolio hazard the board, to the degree that instability in oil prices gives data

on the hazard levels and how money related stock market returns ought to respond in light of oil

stuns. valuation issues of oil-based commodities and vitality subordinates ". This proposes

monetary specialists can all the more likely adapt to their portfolios in the wake of making a

successful marker of oil flimsiness (Kroner et al.1995). Given these disclosures, various

examinations have been coordinated to supervise the execution of oil expenses and shakiness

because of their macroeconomic and microeconomic impacts on the whole economy and especially

on cash related markets. The real chips in oil uniting are thought around the results of

macroeconomic factors. (Dissou, 2010) revealed that macroeconomic factors are totally touchy to

increments in oil expenses and shakiness

In like manner, (Basher and Sadorsky, 2006) accept that an increment in oil costs is an

extension charge, and hence purchasers are searching for ill springs of alternative feasibility from

one perspective and expanding threat and delicacy on the other, lessening stock expenses and

63

riches. Utilizing a multifaceted intervention model that considers both prohibitive and boundless

perils, figures that these makers unequivocally confirm that the danger of oil esteem influences the

lead of protection trades in rising nations.

In spite of essential examinations on the connections between oil esteem improvements and

macroeconomic activity, a few investigations have been given to concentrating on the connection

between oil esteem unconventionality and stock returns. A few articles add various factors to

oversee stock return applications. (Jones and Kaul, 1996) utilized quarterly data for Canada, Japan,

the United Kingdom and the United States during the 1947-1991 period to test whether stocks

came back to oil stuns and whether future genuine cash changes could be guarded. changes in

streams just as anticipated returns. The reason for this examination is to decide if the stock trades

are normal or not, and whether the estimation of the oil esteem shocks on benefits is completely

coordinated. In the light of a standard salary, benefit valuation appear and the utilization of the

Producer Price Index to intervene in the oil esteem list, proof for the US and Canada Panel data

method, the technique by which stock expenses can be completely spoken to in light of oil esteem

paralyzes. these impacts was prompt tricks to genuine cash streams. For Japan and England,

disclosures are not imperative. Utilizing a Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model during the 1979-

1990 period, (Huang et al. 1996) found that the arrival of oil destinies has no significant impact on

huge scale business part records.

Moreover, changes in oil worth can totally influence the stock and enthusiasm of yields in

the mechanical zone and even at the entire economic level. Hence, the adjustments in oil worth

may drive the firm through its impact on the pace of decrease of pay on the grounds of the prompt

impact that might be forced on the ordinary inflation rate and typical genuine financing cost.

2.12.7 Relationship of GDP with Stock Price

(Humpe and Macmillan 2009) investigated positive since quite a while ago run connection

between stock prices and the mechanical generation in the US. (Farhi et al. 2009) examined the

impact of genuine GDP, inflation rate and financing costs (autonomous factors) on stock market

returns (subordinate variable) in Nigeria. (Mustafa et al. 2010) attempted to create exact proof

between the stock market and the genuine economy of Pakistan through an examination study. The

model utilized for this investigation depended on the factors, for example, GDP, generation growth

to speaks to the liquidity of stock market, genuine economy, and the size of the stock market speak

to the stock prices(Campbell et al. 2001) show stock price has a positive relationship with GDP in

the US. (Ewing and Thompson 2007) show that total national output is identified with stock market

index. Mahmood and Dinniah (2009) uncover that total national output has since quite a while ago

64

run balance impact on stock prices in Japan, Korea, Hong Kong and Australia out of the 6 Asian

Pacific nations chose for an examination somewhere in the range of 1991 and 2002. In any case,

(Tan, Loh and Zainudin, 2006) uncover that total national output is adversely identified with stock

prices in Malaysia.

(Pilinkus, 2010) mirrors the impact of the ten fundamental macroeconomic factors on the

stock trades Lithuania and Latvia, and shows that the Estonian Equity advance report has a positive

relationship with expansion, imports and outside financing, and a negative relationship with hard

and fast national yield, joblessness and pass on rates. Different assessments in Nigeria have

demonstrated that GDP unequivocally impacts stock prices. Regardless, (Nkechukwu et al. 2013)

outlined that GDP oppositely impacted stock prices in the Nigeria. These assessments have

demonstrated that there is a causality between stock prices and GDP, and macroeconomic parts

reflect stock prices. In an examination paper drove in Ghana, Osei (2005) shows that GDP and

stock prices are positively related. (Nkechukwu et al. 2013) delineated close to results to Osei

(2005) in Ghana. The (Pilinkus, 2010) Lithuanian securities exchange record (OMXV) has a

positive association with complete national yield and M1 cash supply taking everything into

account and negative relations with the joblessness rate, change the standard, interbank financing

cost and both positive and blended purchaser price archive.

(Pilinkus, 2010) examines the impact of ten imperative macroeconomic factors on the stock

trades Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and prescribes that the Estonian stock record has a positive

association with imports, masterminded CPI and remote direct undertaking, genuine GDP, passes

on, M1 cash supply, joblessness rate and government duty and isn't influenced the extent that

master business change and transient financing cost. Lee and Stewart (2010) examine feebleness

and spillage rates in securities exchanges in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Denmark, Norway and

Siden, and show that stock returns and whimsy show reliance between these financial exchanges

and over the top breaks. from remote markets, particularly from the German DAX record to these

trades.

(Aktan, 2010) take a gander at the Baltic stock exchanges Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

subject to GARCH type models, and that GARCH type models can all the more probable catch the

direction of stock returns and complex time cmyse of action traits and don't realize the higher

danger, higher stock yield. (Pilinkus, 2010) express that CEE trades, including Estonian stock

trades, are somewhat coordinated, connects among CEE and US and German stock trades

increment after EU increase, the last budgetary emergency eases back the mixing procedure and,

aside from Estonia, there is a typical connection between CEE trades and US and German trades.

65

There is proof that it is a perpetual part.

2.12.8 Relationship of Inflation with Stock Price

(Chatrath et al. 1997) investigated association between stock returns and inflationary

examples in India. The maker's examination gave a proof of a negative association between exhibit

returns and inflationary examples in India. (Ralph and Eriki, 2001) analyzed the effect of

macroeconomic factors on Nigerian stock exchange. They found that inflation shows a strong

negative association with the stock price. (Chatrath et al. 1997)record a negative association

between stock returns and inflation rates for Brazil by using Johansen and Juselius co blend tests.

Their assessment watches that stock price and general price levels moreover show a strong since

quite a while back run offset with real financial development and each other. These revelations

support Fama's Proxy hypothesis as time goes on. (Ratanapakorn and Sharma, 2007) uncovered a

positive association between stock prices and inflation while (Humpe and Macmillan, 2009),

indicated the negative effect of inflation on stock prices.

The quality characteristics are a direct result of the GDP deflator, buyers regard dossier

(CPI) and substance for record of these value files. Conceivably CPI is used to find developments

in Pakistan. In like way, improvement has decreased the conjecture of money, which finally

impacted the hypothesis. People buy progressively stable stocks, bonds, silver, gold, outside

money and stocks against growing (Chakravarty et al., 2010). Moreover, the cost of stock depends

on money and non-cash related information. Likewise, this information/data accumulated from

different smyces shows an uncontrolled change being created rate, credit cost, buyer reputation

record and oil cost (Chong et al, 2011). Furthermore, non-financial information is related to

political assessment, emergency and different conditions in the country, and agents use this

information in their basic activity. Right now, of work continues being a marker for the buyer in

the choice of present and future use (Rostagno et al, 2010). Gompers et al. (2003) battled that stock

costs are administered by supply and vitality for a business economy. The offer expense in

Pakistan is from the perspective of the KSE-100 devastation. This record checks the temperature of

the assurances trade, that is, warming and cooling, and models can be evaluated by records of

business area costs. An incredible piece of the present work revolves around the effect of money.

Various progressively exploratory and theoretical monetary experts have hypothesized as

the essential connections between genuine asset returns and expanding and eager connections.

Mukherjee et al. (2002) comparably established a two-path causality between stock expense and

extension rate, while mechanical creation recording prompted stock expense. The Pakistani

66

economy is continually defied with the model performance of celestial eternality, and the expenses

likewise show the dynamic conduct of the time of political iakness. Since political bungle was

normally influence inflation rates, financing expenses, and outside store rates, stock returns are

additionally influenced by this impact (Yahyazadehfar et al. 2012). Albeit a few investigators broke

down the intensity of different political occasions overstock costs, they found no sign that non-

monetary exercises really affected the presentation of the stock trade (Pope et al, 1983). The master

contradicts the perspectives on the two-section consistence dashing states of government guidelines

to make money related techniques by fundamentally influencing stock costs (Cutler et al. 1989).

This audit fluctuates in the stock exchanging framework because of inflatable research in Pakistan.

History has portrayed that stock prices are significant for economic growth and economic action

and are affected by numerous components. It is where the national economy is influenced by stock

prices, where stock price developments influence economic growth, and the ascent in stock prices

assists with boosting the economy. Actually, the stock market is return as a fundamental factor in

economic growth and improvement. (Yahyazadehfar et al., 2012). Also, every nation significantly

affects the stock market economy. What's more, it is a path for organizations to expand them

through the stock market and exchanging market, which have more impact however are not open to

the general population. (Zheng et al., 2010). This gives organizations the alternative to building

their cash-flow to develop their business by exchanging their offers and exchanging their offers the

stock market. Protections exchanging comprises the spine and economic abilities of the economy

because of macroeconomic elements.

The worth that influences stock prices end up being the shopper price list (CPI) and market esteem.

In spite of the fact that CPI is utilized in Pakistan to develop. Inflation likewise decreased the

money figure that influenced the suspicions. Individuals are purchasing all the more dominant gear,

stocks, bonds, gold, silver, and coins that help battle inflation. Reliance on the expense of value is

money related information and this information is gathered from various smyces demonstrating

boundless changes in oil prices, premium and development rates. (Chong et al., 2011). Non-money

related information additionally relies upon political security, country reunification and the various

conditions utilized in long haul arranging and basic leadership. In like manner, the estimation of

the business territory assumes a job in the acquisition of offers for future advantages. (Rostagno et

al., 2010). Gompers et al., (2003) indicated that supply and intrigue powers decide the expense of

stock. The Pakistani economy is continually encountering political and sacred shakiness and offer

prices are influenced by these conditions, which are especially influenced by fear-based

oppression. Inflation, intrigue and outer hold rates are influenced by political precariousness.

67

(Yahyazadehfar et al., 2012). In this manner, stock prices in the stock market ire influenced by

inflation in Pakistan.

(Bhattacharya and Mukherjee 2002) portray that the inflation rate and offer price are two-

way causalities and, then again, set forward by the mechanical generation. The writing shows that

stock prices and inflation relate adversely. (Fama, 1981) clarified that high inflation prompts

economic pulverization and consequently firms started to sell their offers and offers. As stock

stockpile builds, stock prices fall. Then again, inflation can influence stock prices decidedly in light

of the fact that eccentric firms increment stock prices since they are obliged (Ioannidis et al.,

2005).In the money related growth and fiscal arrangements of a private venture, private speculation

ought to be considered to assume a job in economic growth.

2.12.9 Relationship of Firm Size with Stock Price

(Er et al. 2012)considered whether such a size impact can exist where book worth or deals

are utilized as a size estimation pointer of a firm. Drew et al. (2003) report a firm size impact and a

less inescapable book to showcase impact in the Shanghai stock market. Anuradha (2007) explore

the stock return in size and market to book proportion in the CSE.

The size impact and the worth premium get by for every one of the nations analyzed. They

presume that the size and BE/ME impacts are global in character. (Mirela and Madhu, 2004)

research the power of the three factor model (FF, 1993) for values recorded in three primary

European markets to be specific France, German and United Kingdom and paper gives proof that

the beta of the CAPM alone isn't adequate to portray the variety in normal value returns for the

three of the business sectors concerned. (Er et al. 2012) examine the impacts of firm size, book-to-

advertise proportion, book leverage, showcase leverage and income to-price proportion on stock

returns of all nonfinancial ISE firms from July 1992 to June 2005.

(Er et al. 2012) in any case, have discovered no proof that spending underdevelopment

disturbs firm size. Thinking about this disclosure, my outcomes show that fiscal underdevelopment

hampers the progression of advancement to little firms that improves cash related organizations.

Researchers, for example, (Fama and French, 1992) looked for a firm relationship between firm

size and returns. Littler organizations appear to create more significant returns than bigger ones.

Besides, the investigation of these outcomes is disputable. The extra returns of little organizations

can be portrayed as inadequacy, however, then again, they have depicted the preferred position as

far as bearing danger. Little firms are significant for economic amazements contrasted with huge

firms. Market Value is a strategy used to control firm size and is the all-out market estimation of

the organization's value. It is an adaptable technique for estimating firm worth and is determined by

68

duplicating the stock price by the measure of giving offers. The market esteem relies upon the kind

of stock. If an organization has a value, at that point advertise capitalization was be the last stock

price of the market, yet if there are numerous kinds of stock, at that point showcase capitalization

was be all various sorts of value. Deals and benefit growth are evaluated to influence the arrival

rate and market price determined in genuine and recreated markets. It is vague that progress in one

year was influence income and market price determined in reenacted and genuine markets one year

from now. Stock market improvement can be utilized to supplant machine and production line cost

and research concentration.

2.12.10 Relationship of Profitability with Stock Price

(Fama and French, 2006) test the profitability/expected return connection with blended

outcomes. Their cross-sectional relapses propose that income is identified with normal returns in

the way anticipated, however, their portfolio tests recommend that profitability adds nearly nothing

or nothing to the expectation of profits gave by size and book-to-advertise. (Fama and French,

2006) utilizes current income as a straightforward intermediary for future profitability, be that as it

may, and net profitability is a superior intermediary. (Fama and French, 2006) also found that the

stock price responses to change in gaining per share in the Chinese Stock Markets. This

examination uncovers that firms with baffling EPS (gathering) was encounter troublesome

descending iight on their prices on days before the real profit declarations happen Firms with

strong EPS was acknowledge upwards pressure on the prices in the days preceding the

announcements to the market. (Raza, 2010) in her paper investigated the Impact of Financial

Performance of the Company on its Share Price at the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Zhu, (2003)

thought about the stock market and volume of current capital stock and found an enormous positive

connection between stock price and EPS.

Profitability is a significant variable impacting business part offer estimation. An association

that makes and shows important merchandise and organizations for those living in an overall

population and creating pay by considering generation costs adds to and builds up the equivalent.

At the point when an effective association starts to create stores, it was likewise looked to amplify

the size of tasks and help with compensation thusly. At the point when an association starts to give

an appealing entire, the offer was progressively requesting the business part to achieve

development in the estimation of significant worth. Salary after intrigue, hindrance and cost has a

spot with esteem investors. Income per offer is regularly dictated by disconnecting the loop (after

obligation, intrigue, profit and downgrading) on the all-out number of excellent offers.

Subsequently, it is concurred that the stockpile per offer was be purposely seen by stock venders

69

and theorists and was consider equivalent to while picking a gauge of the employment bid esteem

proposition. In the dialog above, i estimated the result of the development in benefit per offer. On

the off chance that EPS separates, the talk happens. In the worth market, numerous factors

influence the business offer estimation. (Chandra, 1981) found that how much a variable business

division gauge was vexed helped money related specialists to settle on an endeavor choice, and

their impact on offer quality was valuable to institutional, the executives, government, and

examiners. Worth is the status of budgetary specialists who stay in assets after all commitments are

satisfied. Possibility of negative worth exists if obligation surpasses smites. The worth alludes to

the leisure activities staying in the assets disseminated to standard or favored stockholders among

singular investors. (Sachdeva, 1994), proposition portions, the correct issues, grant introduction,

etc. He was worried that the determinants of the proposition capabilities in the administration

systems plan ire beneficial. Monetary specialists can similarly create enhancements, keen and

intelligent activities. In late research, the emphasis is on surveying the worth that specialists and

researchers want to look at the area of the capital business division in an assortment of ways.

The valuation movement of the book valuation information indicated a noteworthy impact

in the investigation territory. The measures of financial and accounting factors ire utilized

reflectively so as to look at the worth gauge and profit for esteem. As it might be, Equity Market

Value is influenced by the most basic variable known as Earnings. A compelling association to

assemble Income/Profit raises stores and grows the size of its exercises. At where a substance

draws a gigantic Income/Profit, the enthusiasm of that Corporation's Equity shares similarly

prompts an Increase in the Equity Market. Along these lines, an examination is being completed in

the solid business of Pakistan. Data is gathered from 13 associations of the Pakistan solid industry.

(Pushpa Bhatt, 2012) depicted the impact of obtainment per offer on the offer worth market gauge

with the creation of key responsibilities, as in the significant 50 Indian associations. In his

investigation, (Sanjeet Sharma, 2011) found that securing each offer is the key determinants of

business notoriety in an important way. In this way, monetary specialists manage benefit per-

variable offers before placing assets in any association.

(Faris Nasif AL-Shubiri, 2010) guided his disclosure through basic and assorted backslide

audits and proposed a reasonable and strong relationship between business stock estimating and net

asset regard per offer. Along these lines, he guaranteed that the changes in the expense of stock

depended on extra little scale and full-scale money related segments. (Bushman et al. 2004) expect

that the business area cost of the proposition is for the most part constrained by the qualities of the

intrigue and supply of a specific protections in the business segment.

70

According to the literature and the discussion on the some research issues I developed the following conceptual

framework,

2.13 Conceptual Framework

Figure 1: Conceptual Diagram

A conceptual framework is characterized by (Andersson and Rizwan 2009) as, the legitimate and predictable

arrangement of between associated targets and establishments that should be direct to steady benchmarks that

decide the nature, activity and breaking points of monetary bookkeeping and fiscal summaries. A study directed by

(Berlin, 1953) clarifies that applied structure is a plan that can set up the mutual vision which traces potential

strategies for the activity or present an authorized path to a thought or thought. The calculated system is considered

as a chain of between associated which, together with give a broad skill of a viewpoint. In calculated structure

thoughts or ideas are interlinked and Panel data method one another. The ideas that establish an applied system

Panel data method each other and these ideas manufacture a way of thinking that is explicitly identified with their

theoretical structure. Every single thought of an applied structure goes about as an existential or epistemological

errand in the system. Fundamentally, theoretical systems are not simply mixed of thoughts be that as it may,

generally builds in which every thought goes about as a necessary character. Theoretical structure gives not a

unique/balanced setting however it gives an interpretative way to deal with social reality. Extensively, calculated

structures are not finishing up systems (Jabareen Y.2009).

71

2.14 Hypothesis Development

Lundberg and G.A. to give a temporary portrayal of the proposal as an unsubstantiated

paper that can be spread and the authenticity of this paper despite everything stay to be checked. At

its most essential stage, theories can be the outflow of any impulse, the title deed, or the marker of

vision that has become the premise of the investigation. (Onyeogi, 2000) characterized the

hypothesis as öneri a recommendation that testable shows the connection between at least two

factors and an auxiliary articulation of the connection between at least two factors". As indicated

by Mouton (1990), hip A hypothesis is an articulation that shows a potential connection between at

least two occasions or factors". Fellow (1987) depicts the hypothesis as an articulation portraying

an occasion or characterizing the association between at least two detects. (Kerlinger, 1956)

characterized the hypothesis as a theoretical articulation of the connection between at least two

factors.

2.14.1 Evidences about Hypothesis Development

There is previous study literature about the hypothesis development.

2.14.2 CEO Duality and Stock Price

The CEO duality - the act of a solitary individual going about as both CEO and director of

the board - is one of the most examined corporate administration wonders (Dalton, Hitt, Certo and

Dalton, 2007). As per Shamsul (2006), if the organizations can have separate people in CEO and

chairmanship, the abundance of investors can be expanded. To look at the impact of CEO duality

on the budgetary exhibition of organizations, the time of work from 1994 to 1996 is to gather

information from the organizations recorded in KLSE. The overview got information from the

years because Corporate Governance was not seen as an indispensable component around then.

Most organizations in Malaysia didn't have double sort sheets to show that there ire two distinct

individuals, CEO, and director. Research discoveries show that there is no connection between the

budgetary exhibition of an association and the CEO's duality. Crossland and Hambrick's study

(2007) gathered 15 years of information from 15 German organizations and was contrasted with

100 United States and 100 Japanese organizations with a difference examination approach. The

discoveries of the exploration show that the impact of CEOs 'double execution on firms'

presentations is loir in German and Japanese organizations instead of US organizations. As

indicated by Cooper (2009), the CEO's duality and the bank's exhibition are alleviating. The

examination gauges the presentation of banks utilizing money related measures, Tobin’s Q,

Economic Value Added. Griffith et al. (2002) contended that the CEO's double position didn't

72

significantly affect the exhibition of the association because the expanded abilities of the CEO

didn't improve execution.

2.14.3 Ownership Concentration and Stock Price

(Berle and Means, 1932) contend that the essential attributes of current organizations are

the wide conveyance of ownership between the firm's control of little investors and officials.

Notwithstanding, La Porta et al. (1999) 27 examine property structures in the economy and locate

that institutional ownership is packed in the hands of investors, who are frequently senior

administrators in Istern and Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America. The fundamental institutional

administration issue in these economies is the contention between controlling investors and

minority investors. Controlling investors are I) minority investors I) move of assets from the

organization for their own advantage (burrowing); ii) expanding firm offers through unfair money

related exchanges against minority investors (Johnson et al., 2000) ； and iii) rehashed utilization.

Because of the ownership of controlling investors and powerful control of the firm, conventional

corporate administration estimates, for example, sheets of chiefs and the corporate control market

might be incapable in restricting self-administration conduct (Johnson et al., 2000; La Porta et al.,

1999, 2000 and Shleifer and Vishny, 1997).

2.14.4 Oil Price and Stock Price

Hypothesis essentially accepts the single way relationship between oil and stock price and

doesn't move the other way. Expanding oil prices and stock prices fall, yet raw petroleum prices are

not influenced because of contrasts in the stock market. There is an examination study for this

announcement. (Mustafa, 2007). Numerous speculative strategies clarify the effect of oil prices on

stock prices. From a macroeconomic point of view, rising oil prices significantly affect the income

of firms where oil straightforwardly or by implication adds to the expense of creation. (Sadorsky,

1999; Maghyereh, 2004). On the off chance that organizations can't obtain their expenses to

purchasers, the firm's profit is as per the following (Al-Fayoumi, 2009). As indicated by the

macroeconomic viewpoint, an oil price resembles an inflation charge forced on the two makers and

purchasers with two outcomes. (Basher and Sadorsky, 2006). To begin with, customers don't have

a lot of salary to spend on the substitution of oil-based commodities. Second, non-oil delivering

nations must bear the significant expense and high hazard and vulnerability of the business

condition and the conditions that antagonistically influence share prices. Likewise, oil prices carry

inflation and national banks raise the loan fee to control inflation. Various studies have clarified the

negative impact of oil on stock prices in oil carrying in nations. (Cheung 1998). Narayan and

Narayan (2010) examined that there is a relationship between oil prices and stock prices in

73

Vietnam and presumed that oil price positively affects stock prices in the long term. What's more,

the oil sending out nations positively affect stock prices, and the constructive outcome is on riches

and salary. This is because they increment government income and spend on open ilfare and other

uber plans. (El Fayoumi, 2009). What's more, the rise in oil price moves capital from oil shippers

to oil exporters. The pace of impact relies upon whether oil exporters are making more benefits for

their kin. On the off chance that additions are utilized to purchase administrations and different

things inside the nation, the subsequent impact makes an expanding economic procedure and

improves stock returns in those nations. (Bjørnland,2009).

2.14.5 Inflation & stock price

(Masami & Koh, 2001) recognized that price rises are identified to the stock prices in

Singapore. (Gallagher & Taylor, 2002) announced relationship between the inflation and stock

prices in the US Stock Exchanges and researched that normal and unforeseen inflation unfavorably

influenced stock returns. Mukhopadhyay & Sarkar (2003) inspected the profits of the Indian Stock

Exchange to look at the impact of inflation on stock prices. They realized that inflation in the post-

advancement period affected Indian stock yield. Tursoy et al. (2008) characterized a solid

association between the inflation and stock price. Khan et al. (2013) dissected the impact of certain

macroeconomic factors on stock market prices in Bangladesh. Utilizing the Cointegration model

related to the Vector Error Correction Model, he realizes that inflation doesn't influence stock price

over the long haul. Tripathi and Seth (2013) recognized that Inflation is a key factor in factor study.

They additionally related inflation and stock prices. Therefore, a ton of research on various markets

utilizing strategies and at various time interims gave a negative association between the inflation

and stock price. All things considered, an all-encompassing examination of this advancement for

some, rising economies sticks out, however makes a hole in the researcher's exploration to beat the

ongoing study. Boyd et al. (2001) examined the impact of inflation on the exhibition of money

related markets by utilizing 36-year cross-country measurements by 48 economies. They examined

that the impact of inflation on stock market execution changed at the edge esteem. They contended

that the stock market execution was not related with higher inflation rates and the fall in inflation

was not related with the decrease in stock market execution. Be that as it may, the outcomes show

the straight capacity between stock trade proficiency and inflation. Besides, extra proof

recommends a negative association between stock prices and inflation. This outcome was

accounted for by (Erdem et al. 2005).

74

2.14.6 GDP and Stock Price

(Pilinkus, 2009) shows the absolute national yield is positively associated with the

Lithuanian financial exchange list and has a negative association with the swapping scale,

joblessness rate and the proposed interbank and Lithuanian securities exchange record extent and

insistently connects with price. (Smaliukienė, 2010) applied the GARCH models to investigate the

Baltic financial exchanges in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, exhibiting that this model doesn't bring

stock costs and complex features of time plan, and increasingly genuine peril doesn't bring

progressively critical returns. Süleyman, 2009) made a model by applying various backslide studies

for Karachi Stock Exchange in 1986-2006 and procured verification that GDP doesn't

fundamentally influence stock costs. Most study’s in Nigeria have found that the association

between the GDP and stock costs is a positive one. Basic research in Nigeria is Nwokoma (2011),

which raised that GDP adversely influenced stock costs in Nigeria. Olui (2007) communicated that

there is an association be tien’s stock costs and GDP as time goes on. Ajao &Oseyomon (2010)

guided a Co-integration test to investigate the effect of GDP on stock costs in Nigeria. Various

studies have assumed that there is an essential connection between stock costs and GDP. What's

more, ask about shows that macroeconomic parts, including GDP, explain stock costs. In an

examination drove in Ghana, Osei (2005) found that GDP had a positive association with stock

costs.

2.14.7 Leverage and Stock Price

(George and Hwang 2007) examined the impact of money related annihilation and leverage

prices on share prices. Research has detailed that the normal value growth leverage esteem is

contrarily connected with the book esteem. Eldomiaty, (2002) groups organizations as indicated by

the degree of hazard whether the hazard is generally safe, medium hazard or higher hazard. His

examination shows that the two fundamental aftereffects of the study present two principle

discoveries; the main outcome shows the objective capital developments over the three dangers,

and the subsequent outcome has a positive relationship with long haul leverage, even though there

is no positive relationship for the time being. Learns leverage is a progressively articulated factor at

a high hazard level. (Muradoglu and Sivaprasad 2006) attempted to foresee that aggregate sporadic

stock growth is related with leverage level. The outcomes acquired from their examinations show

that the unpredictable proficiency diminishes by lessening the leverage proportion.

(Carpentier, 2006) has unmistakably investigated the long term variance in leverage in the French

financial market. The examination is the first to propose a test for the inconsequential plan. He took

75

tests from 243 French organizations for the years 1987-1996. He researched whether a firm could

clarify its positive and negative consequences for a stock price by raising or bringing down

leverage levels.

2.14.8 Firm Size and Stock Price

Firm size was utilized as an outer factor to characterize venture choices (Barclay and Smith,

1995)), authoritative favorable position (Jensen and Murphy, 1990) but then to characterize the

necessary pace of return. Even though this strategy has made incredible dreams, there are

numerous motivations to utilize and clarify whether this variable affects venture choices (Zingales,

2000)). Moreover, the earth of organizations is fluctuating quickly. (Pryor (2000). As it is the size i

emphasize, there is a snag that associations face, the constraints of information on the theory of

organizations. Researchers have tackled this issue by stressing the infiltration of a specific industry.

(Zingales, 2004) examined that little firms make more benefits from huge firms. level, the negative

impact emerging from the obstructions on the advancement of the firm was explored in a littler size

than enormous scale firms. The Pakistan stock market investigated the sensible causal relationships

between exchanging limit, unpredictability, and profit for stock in Pakistan's stock market

information on exchange size are valuable in creating evaluations of return and return

unpredictability. The exploration uncovered an input relationship between exchange size and stock

returns.

2.14.9 Profitability and Stock Price

In the research (Ohlson, 1995) that earning per share assume a significant impact in stock

prices. (Collins, 1999) talks about the impact of low productivity and profitability on the stock

prices. (Dechow, 1999) researched the impact of undistributed benefits on stock prices. Collins

&Kothari (1989) show that surprising income changes connect with stock price vacillations.

(Collins, 1999) researched that value is prejudiced by the book estimation of value. Dechow

(1999) researched the impact of profit on value esteem. (Collins, 1999) endeavored to start a

factual relationship with book worth, profitability, and stock price. Collins & Kothari (1989)

endeavored to start the essential relationship between stock returns, the change in EPS, and the size

of an organization. (Zhang and Chen, 2007) revealed the association between stock price,

increment in profitability, change in salary, vacillations in capital venture and variance in rebate

rate. A worldwide report shows that EPS affects stock price. On the following, given solid ground

evidence of the previous study literature, i designed the given Null hypothesis of my study,

76

H1: There is positive relationship between CEO duality and stock price.

H2: There is negative relationship between Ownership concentration and stock price.

H3: There is positive relationship between Inflation and stock price.

H4: GDP has negative relationship with stock price.

H5: Oil price has a positive relationship with stock price.

H6: Leverage has a positive relationship with stock price.

H7: There is negative relationship between firm size and stock price.

H8: Profitability has a negative relationship with stock price.

77

Chapter No. 3

Research Methodology

The first step in conducting information research is to create an appropriate, associative research

technique. According to (Rajasekar and Practice 2013)), methodology is a definite method to address the

topic. An intensive study on how to direct the research. Strategies describing, explaining and predicting

their effort are called the research process. They argued that the system of progress was a smyce of

incredible knowledge.

Despite the possibility that the discovery approach may be faultily chosen by the expert, it was not

solitary yield unusual results, but was also eliminate all efforts to direct the review, thus rendering the

discovery insufficient and unsuccessful. The most important part of guiding any research lies in its

technique as it provides a top-down perspective on the systems and researches the scientist has

participated in. Accordingly, this section aims to give a complete perspective on the facts defined by

the knowledge social relationship and examination to respond to the question of why and how

strategies or systems for dissection are made, information collected target population. The proposed

reasonable structure reinforces the established theory and aids the connections between variables.

3.1 Research Methodology and Research Design

3.1 .1 Type of study

In this impact of fundamental and macro-economic factors on stock price was be checked in

the Sugar and Allied Industry of Pakistan from 2006-2015. It is a consistent and quantitative sort of

study. This was contribute recorded as a hard copy, it isn't simply associated with the explicit issue

of any single affiliation yet considers all Sugar and Allied Industry recorded at PSX (in the past

KSE).

3.1.2 Population

Sugar and Allied industry, consist of 25 firms, are used in this analysis. Sugar and Allied

Industry recorded at PSX (in the past KSE).

3.1.3 Sample and Data collection

The necessary information was be gathered from the yearly reports of related firms, from

Karachi Stock Exchange, from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, from State Bank of Pakistan

(SBP) and from Oil and Gas development authority. With the end goal line of this investigation,

board informational index covers the information of all organizations of the Sugar and Allied

78

industry recorded at Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSE) from the time of 2006 to 2015. The populace

was be all Sugar and Allied organizations recorded at Pakistan Stock Exchange (previously KSE).

To decide the particular factor, this exploration was accepting entire populace as an example.

3.2 Operational Definitions and Measurement of Variables.

3.2.2 Stock Price.

The stock price is the end price of stock on the year's end (Ewing and Malik 2016). (Ewing

and Malik 2016) discussed and debated stock price. He debated that the stock price is influenced

by news and information about stock price and that there is a connection between stock price and

information. The stock value was be evaluated by watching the stock price by the Pakistan Stock

Exchange commission and the Pakistan Stock Exchange.

3.2.3 CEO Duality

(Yermack, 1996) characterizes CEO duality as a position when the CEO and director of the

firm is a solitary man. At the point when a firm has CEO duality, agency issues develop in the

organization which therefore impact money related choice. Subsequently, it is suggested that, there

ought to be two unique people on each post. President duality happens when a lone individual is

meanwhile at the situation of CEO and director of the board.

3.2.4 Ownership concentration

Ownership concentration is measured by percentage of shares owned by investors who own

five percent and more of the total firm shares (Ishak et al. 2010).

3.2.5 Leverage

Leverage originates from obtained cash to contribute and afterward get an arrival on that

venture. Leverage utilized under various conditions to change incomes and money related quality

of a firm. (Bhatti, Majeed, Rehman and Khan, 2010). Leverage is considered as the proportion of

all out fixed liabilities to add up to value. (Nishat, 2000). Leverage can be estimated with this

formula

Leverage = Total Debt/Total Equity

It is accepted that leverage has a positive/negative relationship with stock price (Al-Ajmi,

2008) and (Ku Ismail and Chandler, 2005).

3.2.6 Oil Prices

Unlike most products, oil prices are not fully decided by the supply, demand and market

view for the physical product. Or supply, demand and prediction for oil fate contracts, which have

79

been heavily replaced by theorists, undertake a dominant job in price assurance. Oil prices are

collected from OGRA (Pakistan Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority) site.

The full effect of rising oil prices. (Iscan, 2010) and investigated the stock prices dropped in

the United States with oil prices rising. (Gogineni, 2007) pointed out that stock prices are wasted

by the advances in oil prices. Pakistan Oil and Gas administrative authority. Oil prices are assumed

to have a negative / positive relationship and association with stock prices.

3.2.7 GDP

GDP is estimated by taking the amounts everything being equal and administrations

created, duplicating them by their prices, and adding the aggregate. Total national output alludes to

the all out business area gauge of every single approved great and organizations conveyed in one

nation in one nation. The national money related scale is a significant pointer of the huge scale

economy, for example, generation structure, wage structure, pay structure and use structure.

(Brussels, 2012). Total national output was be estimated by genuine GDP growth rate. (Malik and

Shah, 2013). It is expected that GDP has a positive/negative relationship and association with stock

price.

3.2.8 Inflation

Inflation in the U.S. is normally estimated utilizing the buyer price list (CPI). As indicated

by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CPI is 'a proportion of the normal change after

some time in the prices paid by urban purchasers for a market bin of shopper products and

enterprises. In Pakistan Statistical office measure inflation through viable strategies.

Prices of administrations and upward prices are called inflation. Therefore, it influences

open buying influence, which gives low reserve funds and expanded cash supply. Low reserve

funds decrease economic advancement with low interest in the economy. The Consumer Price

Index (CPI) was utilized to gauge inflation. Shopper Price Index is the lighted normal of the prices

of purchasers' products and enterprises. (Rafique et al. 2013). It is accepted that the inflation has a

positive/negative relationship with the stock price.

3.2.9 Firm size

The perfect firm size of the industry relies upon the particular creation abilities of the

business, including the qualities of capital and economies of scale (Kumar, Rajan and Zingales,

2001). (Berk, 1997) researched that deals or book value estimation of all advantage is applied as a

firm's size count. Firm size is estimated total assets reported in the financial annual reports of the

firms.

80

3.2.10 Profitability

The profitability of the firm. It delineates how ill the administration of a firm makes pay by

using all its asset. Profitability was be determined by profit after tax in sugar businesses since it

relies upon the occasional premise and henceforth Profitably is estimated by profit after tax. Ibadin

et al., (2011). It is assumed that profitability has a positive or negative relationship with the stock

price.

Table 3.1

variable, their measurement

Variable Name

Abbreviation

Measurement

CEO duality CEO CEO duality, measured by 1 if CEO-Chairman

roles combined; 0 if separated

Ownership

concentration

OCN Ownership concentration, measured by

percentage of shares owned by investors who

own five percent and more of the total firm

shares Leverage TD Measured by debt to total asset ratio.

Oil Price OP Pakistan Rupee per Barrel

GDP GDP GDP at factor prices (2012 Base Year)

Inflation INF Consumer Price Index (CPI)

Firm Size FSIZ Firm size =Total Assets

Profitability PAT Profitability is measured by profit after tax

from Annual Financial Reports of firms

Stock Price (DV) SP The end price of share at end of the year

81

3.3 Specifications of the Econometric Model

In this study, panel regression analysis is used to measure the dependence of stock price on

different basic and economic variables. Panel data analysis helps to discover cross-sectional, time

series data simultaneously. Specifically, fixed/random effect model for the estimation is used with

the assumption of constant coefficient. The constant coefficient model assumes that the terms

intersection and slope are constant.

Corporate governance Model.

SPit =0 +1CEODit +2OCNit it

Economic attributes Model.

SPit =0 +1TDit 2 FSit +3GDPit +4 INFit +5 PATit +6OPit it

SP= Stock price

CEOD= CEO duality

FS= Firm Size

GDP= gross domestic product

INF=Inflation

OCN= Ownership concentration

OP= Oil price

PAT=Profit after tax/ is proxy of profitability

TD=Total debt

Ɛt = Error Term

β0 =represents the Slop

0= Intercept of the equation

The review by (Hasan et al. 2020)examines work packages and their impact on corporate

governance in Pakistan for non-money associations registered in Pakistan's Karachi Securities

Trade (BSE) between 1998-2002. money specialists see the business package as a framework for

82

removing investors with feir offers in the association. Of cmyse, relative firm exhibition

discoveries indicate that business packages in Pakistan are effective money-related approaches,

which are the best option for incomplete or inefficient for missing associations and markets.

Research by (Ghani and Ashraf 2005) assesses the initial stages, expansion and exit of accounting

practices and risks in Pakistan and the factors affecting them. In the research, expert security and

prosperity about money do not continue; legal deficiencies and iak approval frameworks are more

essential than social components that depict the accounting situation in Pakistan. The study

assumes that these are the chief approval bodies to develop the idea of accounting in creating

nations. There is broad daringness to separate the management's impact on the protection trade in

Pakistan; Various issues are not there anyway. Especially, the level of institutional management at

the level of the association and its impact on the valuation of the association, which is the main

issue of this field, requires significant research. From this perspective, ebb and flow research means

taking responsibility when writing on Corporate Management. Goals of Corporate Governance are:

• To shield singular enthusiasm of every investor.

• To ensure the aggregate enthusiasm all things considered.

• Objective of the Corporate Governance is to not permit any partner to spare his

enthusiasm at the expense of some other partner and not allow any single partner to

take choices of an association.

At the point when every one of these focuses was be mulled over while actualizing the

codes of corporate administration, the firm's profitability was be improved, and this was be a

positive sign for financial specialist's speculation and assurance.

83

Chapter No 4

Results and Discussions

The objective of the current chapter is to provide the results of the data analysis related to the models

of this study about the impact of the governance on stock prices. It also reports the GDP and Inflation

impact on stock prices of Pakistan sugar companies. This chapter is divided into eight sections,

organized as follows: Section 4.1 shows the sample and data collection of the study. The descriptive

analysis of the data is presented in Section 4.2, followed by Section 4.4 on the findings of the

regression assumptions. Section 4.5 reviews and discusses the multiple regression analysis. Section

4.6 presents the results of the hypotheses testing and Section 4.7 reviews the summary of regression

analysis and finally, a summary of the chapter is offered in Section 4.8.

4.1 Sample and Data Collection

Organizations recorded on the Pakistan Stock Exchange are the subjects of this

examination. This is because of the organizations are represented by the guidelines and rules of the

Pakistani Listing Requirements and Pakistan Code of Corporate Governance. Firms listed on the

Pakistan Stock Exchange are partitioned into three divisions: administrations, modern and money

related segments. This investigation covers the sugar and partnered firms recorded on the

Exchange from year 2006 to 2015. These years are chosen in light of the fact that the corporate

administration code in Jordan was at that point actualized during these years (i.e., 2009 - 2012).

The procedure of information assortment included acquiring the yearly monetary reports of modern

and administrations firms straightforwardly from the firms, their sites or the site of the Pakistan

stock trade. Consequences of this examination was be induced based on board information relapse

nonetheless; relationship coefficient was likewise be determined between the stock price and the

autonomous factors. (Malik and Shah, 2013) utilized this system to know the impact of central and

macroeconomic factors on stock prices. The present investigation was utilize board relapse

examination for looking for the relationship among both the logical and subordinate variable. Panel

information examination encages analysis of cross-sectional and time variant information as this

study is estimating information of various organizations of Sugar and Allied Industry and

estimating information in various time spans. For measurable examination various bundles are

utilized, for example, SPSS, Gretl and E-Views are used for this purpose.

84

The necessary information was be gathered from the yearly financial statements or reports of

related firms from Pakistan Stock Exchange commission, from the official website of Pakistan

Bureau of Statistics, from data provided by central bank which is State Bank of Pakistan and

from Oil and Gas department. With the end goal of this examination, board informational

collection covers information of all organizations of the Sugar and Allied industry recorded at

Pakistan Stock Exchange from the time of 2006 to 2015. The population was be all Sugar and

Allied organizations recorded at Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSE). To decide the particular factor,

this examination was accept entire populace as an example. The details of the sample of the

study can be seen in Table 4.1:

Table 4.1

Descriptive of Sample collection firms

Sector Firms

Sugar and allied industries 25

The details of the firms are given below: -

Sr. No Name of Industry

1 Abbas Sugar Mills

2 Adam Sugar Mills

3 Alnoor Sugar Mills

4 Ansari Sugar Mills

5 Baba farid Sugar Mills

6 Chashma Sugar Mills

7 Colony Sugar Mills

8 Dewan Sugar Mills

9 Faran Sugar Mills

10 Habib Sugar Mills

11 Hasseb Waqas Sugar Mill

12 Husein Sugar mills

13 JDW Sugar Millls

14

Khairpur Sugar mills

85

15 Mehran Sugar mills

16 Mirpur khas sugar mills

17 Mirza Sugar Mills

18 Noon Sugar mills

19 Preimer Sugar Mills

20 Sakrand Sugar Mills

21 Sanghar Sugar Mills

22 Shahmurad Sugar Mills

23 Shahtaj Sugar Mills

24 Sindh Adadar Sugar Mills

25 Tandian Wala Sugar Mills

4.2 Descriptions of the sample

Table 4.5 presents the descriptive statistic that includes maximum values, minimum values, a mean and

standard deviation of the independent and dependent variables, using data from sugar industries of the

Pakistan Stock Exchange from 2006 to 2015. For the dependent variable, this study used the stock

price.

Table 4.2

Descriptive of Sample with mean, maximum and minimum value

CEOD

FS

INF

OCN

OP

SP

TAS

TD

GD P

PAT

Mean

0.1969

7

38.117

08

10.442

54

2.8989

9

201.52

67

32.221

26

3.8117

08

10.7063

.6

9.67

6.3053

12

Median

0

25.828

7

7.2743

19

3

187.37

19.485

2.5828

7

3.7656.

74

9.4

4.5979

18

Maximum

1

34.959

17

20.666

52

8

324.86

293.13

5

34.959

17

11.0889

2

11.1

3

1.8

Minimu m

0

2.1437

67

4.1102

47

0

102.54

0

0.2147

67

0

4.11

-7.798

86

The results in Table 4.2 show that CEO duality has a mean value 0.196 with the

maximum value of 1 and minimum value is 0, it shows that 20% of firms have CEO duality,

CEO has a combined role. Total firm size with a mean value of 38.117 with maximum 34.59

and minimum of

2.147 means that a firm has a total asset of about 38.117 on average. The inflation rate has a

mean value of 10.442 with maximum value 20.66 and minimum value 4.110, it means that

Pakistan's economy has an average inflation rate prevailing in that days are 10.442. ownership

concentration has a mean value of 2.89 with maximum value 8 and with minimum value 0, it

means that 3 shareholders that hold 5 % or more shares on average. The oil price has to mean

value 201.52 rupees per barrel with a maximum value of 324.86 and with minimum 102.54, it

means that 201.52 rupees per barrel average price prevail in the selected period. Total assets of

the firms have 3.817 on average with the maximum value of 293.135 and with minimum value

0.2147. leverage has a mean value of 10.70 with maximum value 11.088 and with minimum 0,

it means that 10.70 average leverage prevails in the selected period. GDP has a mean value of

9.57 with a maximum value of 11.41 and with minimum 4.11, it means that there is high

fluctuation in the economic factors and has a greater standard deviation.

4.3 Regression Assumptions

This study uses Panel regression analysis to examine the association between the independent

variables and the stock price. There are some assumptions that have to be satisfied before the data is

analyzed: multicollinearity and autocorrelation. To test the effect of independent variables – this study used

the different proxies for the measurements of the variables.

4.3.1 Multi-collinearity

The point of this study or research is to look at the relationship among reliance and free

factors and different factors (Shukeri and Nelson, 2010) and stated that if the relationship be

tween’s autonomous factors is above 0.90, various linearity issues emerge. In the models of this

investigation, two strategies ire utilized to discover multi- linearity issues: Pearson Correlation

(relationship network) and Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Table 4.7 shows the Pearson

Correlation coefficients between factors. In this investigation, all relationship coefficients between

autonomous factors in the connection lattice ire under 0.90. This implies different linearity isn't an

issue in the relapse model. In this investigation, the discoveries of Pearson Correlation grid

demonstrated that the most elevated relationship (0.63) was among TAS and TAD.

Std.

Dev.

0.3987

17

4.6825

27

5.9663

91

1.5867

15

76.013

42

39.479

76

4.6825

27

1.06016

1.96

6

7.666

87

Table 4.3

Correlation matrix of the sample

CEOD CROSSID DATEID FS GDP INF OCN OP PAT SP TAS TD

CEOD 1

CROSSID -0.0595 1

DATEID

0.15919

5

0.133549

1

FS

0.00313

3

-0.05874

0.28724

1

GDP

0.13303

0.120541

0.98066

0.29081

4

1

INF

0.01259

9

-0.03512

-0.50178

-0.15725

-0.53636

1

OCN -0.13689 0.093248 -0.00689 -0.11312 -0.00922 -0.07279 1

OP

0.14336

9

0.070388

0.26735

8

0.04045

0.10322

9

0.054159

-0.01648

1

PAT

-0.04301

0.115412

-0.0319

-0.02153

-0.0443

0.007514

0.09314

2

0.008105

1

SP

-0.05794

-0.08024

0.15511

4

0.61264

3

0.18167

2

-0.13877

0.04187

6

-0.10639

0.108796

1

TAS

0.00313

3

-0.05874

0.28724

1

0.29081

4

-0.15725

-0.11312

0.04045

-0.02153

0.61264

3

1

TD

0.00538

4

-0.19477

0.19771

7

0.63798

7

0.18648

8

-0.12498

-0.07337

0.06675

-0.02772

0.37453

1

0.63798

7

1

88

4.4 Panel Regression Analysis

To test the hypotheses, Fixed/Random effect models are used for the panel regression

analysis, which is used to examine the association between corporate governance and economics

attributes and stock price. In this study, the stock price is derived from the Pakistan stock

exchange prevailing in that day in average.

4.4.1 Model Specification

4.4.2 Corporate governance Model.

SPit =0 +1CEODit +2OCNit it

4.4.3 Economic attributes Model.

SPit =0 +1TDit 2 FSit +3GDPit +4 INFit +5 PATit +6OPit it

Where,

SP= Stock price

CEOD= CEO duality

FS= Firm Size

GDP= gross domestic product

INF= Inflation

OCN= Ownership concentration

OP= Oil price

PAT=Profit after tax/ is proxy of profitability

TD=Total debt

4.5 Hypothesis Testing

This section discusses the results of the regression analysis between the independent

variables and stock price. Three groups of hypotheses are involved: (i) corporate governance

89

attributes (CEO duality and Ownership concentration) (ii) Economic attributes (GDP and

Inflation and Oil prices) and (iii) Control factors (variables) includes Leverage, profitability and

firms’ size. The results of regression analysis for Corporate governance and economic attributes

model are given in Table 4.4 (A &B).

Table 4.4 (A)

Results of Random Effect for Corporate governance model

Variable Coefficient Prob

CEOD 2.892082 0.0102***

OCN -0.097623 0.1563

*Significant at the 0.1 level ** Significant at the 0.05 level *** Significant at the 0.01 level.

Table 4.4 (B)

Results of Random Effect for Microeconomic model

Variable Coefficient Prob

OP -0.038177 0.0116***

GDP -9.780013 0.6595

TD -2.100874 0.0587**

PAT -5.46006 0.4327

FS 5.6098431 0.0000***

INF -0.268503 0.0513**

SP (-1) 0.910360 0.0000***

*Significant at the 0.1 level ** Significant at the 0.05 level *** Significant at the 0.01 level.

4.6 Hausman Fixed/Random Effect Specification Test The study has employed Hausman model specification test, which allows us for the fixed or

random specification of the model, in the panel data estimation. The results of the Hausman test

are provided in the following. The results do not reject the Null hypothesis that the random is

preferable. So, the study used random effect model for the estimation of the study model.

90

Table 4.5 (A)

Hausman specification test results for Corporate governance model

Test Summary Chi-Sq. Statistic Chi-Sq. def. Prob.

Cross-section random 1.950541 3 0.5827

Cross-section random effects test comparisons:

Variable Fixed Random Var (Diff.) Prob.

CEOD 4.352573 2.892082 6.299775 0.5606

OCN 1.781361 2.002296 0.037963 0.2568

Source: Author’s estimation

Table 4.5 (B)

Hausman specification test results for Economic attributes model

Test Summary Chi-Sq. Statistic Chi-Sq. def. Prob.

Cross-section random 10.267800 6 0.1138

Cross-section random effects test comparisons:

Variable Fixed Random Var (Diff.) Prob.

GDP 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.4407

INF -0.286600 -0.268503 0.000205 0.2066

OP -0.061439 -0.061398 0.000001 0.9711

PAT 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.0130

TAS 0.000006 0.000005 0.000000 0.3091

FS 0.000006 0.000006 0.000000 0.3676

TD 0.000000 0.000002 0.000000 0.6122

Source: Author’s estimation

4.7 Autocorrelation

The presence of autocorrelation is checked using Durbin-Watson statistics, a test to detect

the presence of autocorrelation in residues from a regression analysis. According to (Kazmier,

1996), an acceptable value for Durbin-Watson statistics is between 0 and 4 - a value below 1.4

indicates the presence of a strong positive series correlation problem between the sample data

and a value greater than 2.6 indicates a strong negative autocorrelation series problem. As shown

91

in Table 4.6, the Durbin-Watson value of the corporate governance model is 2.09. Therefore,

there is no autocorrelation problem among the sampled data and Durbin-Watson value of the

Economics attributes model is 2.21 and Therefore, there is no autocorrelation problem among the

sampled data.

Table 4.6

Autocorrelation Test for Models

Model R-squared Adjusted R-

squared

Prob(F-statistic) Durbin-Watson

Corporate governance

Model

0.812980

0.76230 0.0000 2.09

Economic indicators

Model

0.712932

0.65121 0.0000 2.21

4.8 Corporate governance and stock price.

Two hypotheses ire developed regarding the relationship between Corporate governance

(i.e., CEO Duality and Ownership concentration) and stock price. The following is the discussion

of the results between each variable of corporate governance and stock price.

4.8.1 Hypothesis 1 - CEO duality and stock Price

This study expects a negative association between CEO duality (CEOD) and stock price.

The result of regression analysis shows that the CEO duality is significantly and positive related

to stock price (t =-2.892082, P= 0.0102), as evidenced in Table given above. It means that CEO

duality has increased the stock price because in Asian countries firms are controlled by the

family. In Family business CEO has the combined role in the organizations and make major

decision by effective management style and take necessary steps for improvement through timely

taking decisions. In some organizations where CEO duality are not existing stock price has

increasing trend due to others factors of the success of the organization.

4.8.2 Hypothesis 2 - Ownership concentration and stock price

Hypothesis 2 predicts that ownership concentration (OCN) has no significant relationship

with stock price. The true evidence which are reported in Table show that Ownership

concentration is not significantly related to stock price. Ownership concentration has the major

shareholders that hold 5% share or more in total shareholding. It means that the major

shareholding that has 5% or more share has no taking part in stock price improvement. In this

regards my results reject my hypothesis.

92

4.9 Economic indicators.

4.9.1 Hypothesis 3 - Oil price and stock Price.

This hypothesis proposes that there is a positive association between oil prices and stock

price. Contradictory to expectations, this study found oil prices has significant and negative

relationship with stock price with (t=-0.038177, p=0.0116). It means that when oil prices

increased then stock price decrease due to the inflation in the economy and has negative

relationship with stock price.

4.9.2 Hypothesis 4 - GDP and stock Price

This study assumes a positive association between GDP and stock price. As shown in Table the

model shows that there is not significant association between GDP and Stock price (t= -

9.780013, p= 0.6595). It means that GDP in Pakistan has no impact on the stock prices of the

firms. In this regards my results are not support my hypothesis.

4.9.3 Hypothesis 5 - inflation and stock Price

This study predicts a positive association between Inflation and stock prices. As shown in

Table, there is negative relationship between inflation and stock prices (t =-0.268503, p=

0.0513). These results are negatively significant at the level of 5%. It means that inflation is a

bad sign for the economy that has a negative impact on the stock prices. When the inflation rate

in the economy increase then stock prices decrease. My results are consistent with my hypothesis

in this regard.

4.10 Control variables.

4.10.1 Hypothesis 6 - Leverage and Stock Price

Leverage has a negative relationship with the stock price (t=-2.100074, p=0.0587). it

means that when a portion of the debt in the total equity increased than my leverage increased,

and stock prices decreased. High leverage is a negative sign for the firms. To taking a moderate

level of leverage firms to make different policies. In this regards my results supported my

hypothesis.

4.10.2 Hypothesis 7 - Firm size and stock Price

Firm size has a positive relationship with stock prices (t=5.6096814, p=0.0000). It means

that the size of the firms' increases then stock prices also increase. Firm size is measured by the

total assets of the firm. The total assets of the firms have a positive impact on the stock prices.

When asset increase then there is a rate of the growth in the firm also increased and that’s why

stock price increases.

93

4.10.3 Hypothesis 8 - Profitability and stock Price

My results in context to profitability have no significant relationship with the stock prices

with (t=-5,46006, p=0.4327). It means that profitability has no impact on stock prices. If there is

the increase in the profitability of the firms has no effect seen in stock prices in sugar industries

that is totally different from the other sectors due to disclosure of the full information to general

public for the profitability. In Pakistan Sugar industries are completely governed by few landlord

families that has monopoly in the market and make window dressing in disclosure of the

information to general public. In Pakistan recently about the profitability many cases are

discovered by the regulating authority.

94

Chapter No 5

Conclusion and Recommendations

5.0 Introduction

This section abridges and talks about the regression results and findings discussion. This

section also long detail on primary outcomes and gives extra experiences into the impact of

corporate governance components and stock price, that is an overview of the study. The other

part is sorted out as follows. Section 5.1 presents a review of this study. Area 5.2 talks about

hypothesis long discussion. Section 5.3 offers implementations and area 5.4 talks about

limitations. Section 5.5 presents the recommendation for upcoming research.

5.1 Overview of the Study

Forming the capital, raising economic growth is represented by Stock Price. Funding

investors and user's financial information, risk allocation, and transporting are facilitated by

Trading of securities. Investment flows towards productive projects boost the economy. Share

prices support decision making by Investors. Share price change and variations in financial

important variables have a strong relationship. Daily basis fluctuations in Stock prices can be

observed. Fluctuation in stock prices of certain stocks happens after a regular interval of time. I

can say that supply and demand forces give stock prices. You cannot predict the actual change in

stock prices. But, the important factors, methodological factors, and market sentiments are the

factors that can bring some probabilities. Investors analyses firms by observing stock prices.

Calculating the firm’s value is the major task for the analyst of stock price hired by most of the

firms because the firm value has a playas significant role for investors. Essential analysis and

specialized analysis are strategies to investigate stock prices. (Siregar, 2004) clarifies that the

essential analysis is an analysis of the estimation of a stock which incorporates the analysis of the

state of the organization, business analysis, analysis of the national economy and worldwide

economic analysis While specialized analysis is the analysis of the development of a stock price

dependent on authentic price developments in the stock itself the past. (Astutik.et al.2014).

(Tursoy et al. 2008) has tested, the Arbitrage Pricing Theory in Istanbul Stock Exchange

(ISE), for the period of February 2001-September 2005, on a month premise. In their

examination, they utilize 13 macroeconomic factors tending to, the foremost marker of an

economy explicitly

95

cash supply, mechanical creation, unrefined Price of the oil, buyer value list, import, trade, gold

value, change scale, financing cost, GDP, outside hold, joblessness rate, and market pressure list

on 11 industry cymose of action of Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) to watch the effects of these

components on stock returns. They find that the whole of the components are titanic in clarifying

stock return while there are beside no distinctions among advance portfolios. (Er, and Vurdan,

2012). This study covers the linkage of the stock price with, inflation, Price of the oil, GDP,

leverage, firm size, and profitability. This study is a panel study and the data is collected in

different time frames. The sample population selected for this study is limited to Sugar and

Allied industry listed at Pakistan stock exchange PSX. For better insight, the whole population

was be selected. In this study, the impact of some macro-economic variables was be studied on

stock price as ill as the impact of fundamental variables was also be studied.

5.2 Discussion of Hypotheses

5.2.1 CEO duality and stock Price.

My results show that there is a positive association between CEO duality and stock

prices. It means that if the CEO and Chairman of the board have both positions that increase the

stock price and have a positive relationship between both variables. In this respect My results

consistent with the previous study conducted by (Jebran et al. 2020). The result of regression

analysis shows that the CEO duality is significantly and positively related to stock price (t =-

2.370810, P= 0.0192), as evidenced in Table given above. It means that CEO duality has

increased the stock price because in Asian countries firms are controlled by the family. In

Family, business CEO has the combined role in the organizations and make the major decision

by effective management style and take necessary steps for improvement through time taking

decisions. In some organizations where CEO duality is not existing stock price has an increasing

trend due to other factors of the success of the organization.

5.2.2 Ownership concentration and stock price

Ownership concentration (OCN) has no significant relationship with the stock price. The

true evidence which is reported in Table shows that Ownership concentration is not significantly

related to stock price. Ownership concentration has the major shareholders that hold 5% share or

more in total shareholding. It means that the major shareholding that has 5% or more share has

no taking part in stock price improvement. In this regards my results reject my hypothesis. My

96

results show the similar results as to (Berle and Means, 1932), that the basic characteristics of

modern companies are the wide distribution of ownership, between the firm's control of small

shareholders and executives. However, La Porta et al. (1999), stated that ownership structures in

the economy and find that institutional ownership is concentrated in the hands of shareholders,

who are often senior executives, in Astern and Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America. The

main institutional governance problem in these economies is the conflict between controlling

shareholders and minority shareholders. Due to the ownership of controlling shareholders,

effective control of the firm, traditional corporate governance measures such as boards of

directors and corporate control over the market may be ineffective in limiting self-service

behavior (Johnson et al., 2000).

The Panel data method of shareholders concerned about the specific benefits of control

are encouraged to influence the financial information of their firm. If the private interests of

shareholders are determined by external shareholders, external shareholders was likely take

disciplinary action against them and seek compensation ( Shleifer and Vishny, 1997) contend

that clients who need to ensure their private advantages related with their Panel data method deal

with their income to conceal organization execution from outer investors. They see solid

financial specialist assurance limits insiders 'capacity to increase explicit advantages and

decrease insiders' motivators to veil firm execution. In any case, while controlling responsibility

for, keeps on expanding in the wake of increasing successful control, confiscation impetuses

from minority investors decline, as portions of seizure costs increment, and seizure benefits

decline. Hence, the coupling impact can be alleviated by this arrangement impact. The data sway

suggests that it might be in light of authentic concern for investors, minority investors to

distribute almost no money related data in light of the fact that putting away private data can

lessen rivalry and, dodge the significant expenses of settling on amicable choices. Both

settlement and data impacts foresee that responsibility for controlling investors is, related with

low-benefit divulgence. The arrangement impact surmises that responsibility for controlling

investors is related with high- income mindfulness. Utilizing information from seven East Asian

nations, observational examination gives proof predictable solidification and data sway.

5.2.3 Leverage and stock Price

There is a negative relationship between leverage and stock prices. These outcomes are

contrarily noteworthy at the degree of 5%. It shows that leverage have a significant impact on

stock price. Results shows that when there is increased in leverage it was leads to significantly

decrease in the stock price. My outcomes are reflected to my hypothesis in this way.

97

Barakat (2014) study reflected the impact of financial leverage on market value of share price

from 2009 to 2012 on Saudi industrial companies. He observed that leverage which used as a

proxy for debt ratio has insignificant and negative relationship with the market price of the share.

The author further discuss that long-term liabilities to total asset have statistically significant in

determination of share price in Saudi industrial companies. (Yasser and Al Mamun 2015)

analyzed selected manufacturing firms of Bangladesh. They revealed that leverage is significant

negatively and size is significant positively impacting on stock returns in overall industrial data.

(Hussain et al. 2011) study revealed the impact of Financial leverage in capital structure on share

price of cement sector of Pakistan Stock Exchange. They used multiple regression analysis on

the data of eleven cement companies from Pakistan Stock exchange. They found that capital

structure and financial leverage has negative impact on share price in stock market.

5.2.4 Price of the oil and stock Price.

The price of the oil has a noteworthy and negative (-ve) relationship with stock prices. It

implies that when Price of the oil expanded at that point stock price decline because of the price

in the economy and has negative association with stock price. Price of the oil is critical for

financial specialists and all partners of the market. Likewise, contrasts in Price of the oil are

important for both money related financial specialists and the market for two reasons. The

principal reason is that long haul choices and arranging are taken by purchasers and makers,

considering changes in Price of the oil. The subsequent explanation is that Investor's choices are

influenced by oil-related exercises and hazard the executives is affected by Price of the oil. Thus,

Price of the oil are critical for all partners for arranging, speculation, basic leadership, and

utilization. (Deshmukh et al. 2012) expressed that the generation of definite products and

enterprises and the benefit of the organization’s ire influenced by the adjustments in Price of the

oil when the arrangement creators made the strategy. Likewise, since the Price of the oil changes

are delicate to budgetary choices identified with changes in Price of the oil and hazard the

executive's choices and venture choices, Price of the oil changes give chance level data and stock

market moves for oil changes. in the portfolio. This shows financial specialists can contribute

and deal with their portfolios productively with the information on the Price of the oil instability.

(Kroner et al., 1995). As indicated by these outcomes, numerous scientists have discovered the

development of the Price of the oil because of their macroeconomic consequences for the

economy and stock trades. Examination of the Price of the oil changes is identified with the

impact of macroeconomic factors on stock trades. Short et al. (2012) states that as oil is a

significant piece of the contribution of numerous businesses, the rising Price of the oil make

conditions for the economy because of expansion and high joblessness. (Basher and Sadorsky

98

2006) expect that the rising Price of the oil goes about as expansion charge and that buyers are

searching for increments in hazard and imbalance that loir stock prices, just as substitution of

vitality assets. Utilizing the multifaceted intervention model, the proof has demonstrated that the

Price of the oil chance influences stock market effectiveness in developing markets by allowing

all hazard factors. Numerous examinations have built up a connection between Price of the oil

conduct and macroeconomic procedures, and a couple of research articles have analyzed the

connection between Price of the oil conduct and stock.

5.2.5 GDP and stock Price

There isn't a critical relationship between GDP and Stock price. It implies that GDP in

Pakistan does not affect the stock prices of the organizations. Right now results do not Panel data

method my theory. The chief examination showed, a positive relationship between monetary

development and stock market prices. (Fama, 1981) showed a positive and strong association

between stock prices and GDP. In another examination on macroeconomic variable, (Campbell,

2001) show a positive association with Gross domestic production (GDP) and offer prices in the

United States. (Ewing and Thompson 2007) show that Gross domestic production (GDP) is

related to the stock market record. Explicitly (Ibrahim and Aziz 2003) in Malaysia and in

remarkable assessments in the ASEA-5 countries, Mohammad, (2009) show that Gross domestic

production (GDP) is a strikingly mind blowing factor in explaining the organization's

effectiveness and execution. (Khalid et al. 2012), showed that GDP deliberately influenced stock

prices in Japan. Tan, (2006) showed that GDP and stock prices have a negative relationship in

Malaysia.

(Chandra, 2004) shows that the US GDP and stock prices have a positive relationship. (Singh et

al. 2011) found that Gross domestic production (GDP) is a noteworthy factor affecting stock

returns. (Singh et al. 2011) found that Gross domestic production (GDP)was not adequately

ready to impact share prices in Pakistan. (Liu, 2006) found that GDP acknowledged changes in

share prices in China. (Al-Jafari et al. 2011) return the association between stock prices and

macroeconomic factors in Malaysia. They used Vector auto-backslide, co-mix procedures and

inspected that the stock was earnestly compared with GDP. The cointegration test is used to

check the association among exchanges and macroeconomic factors as time goes on.

5.2.6 Inflation and stock Price

There is a negative connection between inflation and stock prices. These outcomes are

contrarily noteworthy at the degree of 5%. It implies that inflation is an awful sign of the

economy that decrease stock prices. At the point when the inflation rate in the economy

99

increment at that point stock price decline. My outcomes are predictable with my hypothesis in

such a manner. (Al-Jafari et al. 2011) acknowledge that high expansion predicts a monetary rot

and keeps up these perspectives and starts selling affiliations' offers. Adding to stock, stockpile

diminishes stock expenses. An ordinary cash related crisis urges firms to sell their cash related

stocks, as stocks reflect the creating ability of firms later on, and high headway and low stock

costs was when all is said in done come (Al-Jafari et al. 2011) in the like manner communicated

that there is a negative association between stock costs and growing. Past what many would

think about conceivable, (Bhattacharya and Mukherjee 2002) showed a two- cymose causality

between stock creation and progression rate, while mechanical creation record incited stock

expense. Clearly, a shocking association among increase and stock spending is in like manner

possible, as the development in quality perception of whether affiliations are net borrowers or not

(Ioannidis et al., 2005). While contemplating the Greek economy, (Ioannidis et al. 2004) used the

ARDL joint trade-off framework as a component of the merger with Granger causality tests, and

the possible long stretch and transient releases among growth and insurances trading costs,

similarly as the title of these effects. The results offer an assertion to a long stretch negative

causal association between the techniques for action after 1992. I offer an additional structure of

progress in Pakistan, as the pace of augmentation has been a substitute model in the past given

the world's oil costs, political parts and cash related crises, and the monetary crisis and progress

in mental persecution. In this manner, this cmyse of action was unequivocally planned to assess

the changing effect of this macroeconomic part on stock utilizations. Thusly, macroeconomic

measures are not really identical from economy to economy. The working level is only for

Pakistan, which is the Karachi stock exchange, which measures the augmentation period of

Pakistan. Without a doubt, even the topographically neighboring countries are continuing with

their own techniques for the cost of advances and extending and stock records may have various

report measures. This work was made unmistakably by thinking about the conditions of Pakistan.

Likewise, for example, the money related expense of this assessment, which impacts Stock

spending, has starting late explored the effect of the extension on stock uses in the light of how

that this examination has a closer effect. Additionally, a progressively observable broadening in

the Pakistani affiliation is fundamental, so a to and from assessment was assist with

understanding this Pakistani condition. Protections exchanges are the making of economic and

economic points of confinement because of macroeconomic divisions (Qamri et al. 2015). He is

likewise an exhibit reviser who shows the expense of inventory of this economy by setting up the

leisure activity and supply powers of the economy considering the possibility of a free economy.

Cost of reclamation quality in security markets with various little scales and full-scale powers,

100

whether or not significant or discretionary. Moreover, the methodology of individuals influences

comparatively the spending of protections exchanging. On the off chance that individuals are

progressively disposed to purchase portions of an affiliation, costs was be diminished if their idea

to fall slanted in the field of business falls. Augmentation is one of the persuading

macroeconomic factors that negatively affect money related improvement (Rostagno et al,2010).

5.2.7 Firm size and stock Price

There is a association between firm size and stock prices. It implies that size of the

organizations, expands then stock prices additionally increment. Firm size is estimated by, the all

out resource of the firm. Complete resource of the organizations have positive impact on the

stock prices. At the point when stock market increment, at that point there is the pace of the

growth in the firm likewise expanded and that is the reason stock price increments. (Clinicians'

and Laeven, 2003) explored that business adventures, portrayed with a lot of troublesome assets,

are getting quicker in nations with strong private property rights protection. On the off chance

that little firms have higher measures of impalpable assets and their inflexible property rights are

under budgetary improvement (Levine, 1999), at that point my outcomes for firm size might be

fake. Regardless, i affirm my outcomes while checking the correspondence of present-day

reliance on immaterial assets and national property rights affirmation. What's more (Fisman and

Love 2007) contend that progress in cash is required, especially for undertakings with huge

advancement openings. In my model, i may catch between sectoral contrasts being developed

chances, instead of firm-size cross-sectoral logical inconsistencies, given the likelihood that little

firms' business ventures are additionally better than average improvement openings.

Nevertheless, i continue to find that while budgetary improved in the United States Panel data

method the progress of money and the co-operation of the growth rate of each industry, it

actually has a particular impact on the development of business ventures from small firms.

Eventually, i ire concerned that market size, human capital capabilities and level of monetary

improvement could affect the industry size, negatively affect US use as a reference country, and

lead to improper derivatives.

In any case, while checking for country-specific characteristics, i continue to find that

money-related progress has a particularly sustained development impact on small firms. Besides,

i reaffirm the discoveries of this study by using the optional meanings of the size of the

mechanical firm as a reference country.

There are limitations to my research. A few speculations predict that progress in money,

reduces data and exchange costs, especially to help small firms. By these hypotheses, i discover

predictable evidence. In any case, i do not look at the progress of money in the chain, the links to

101

particular data and exchange costs, and to very little firm development. It's like RZ. They find

reliable evidence with speculation that a monetary recovery reduces external account costs. They

do not directly measure the cost of the outer ridge. As a result, although the discoveries of this

study show that budgetary progress actually supports and give direction to monetary

development by developing the development of commercial ventures from small firms, further

research is needed to link these discoveries to specific data and exchange costs. In addition to

comparative lines, budget business sector imperfections can prevent the development of small

firms' business ventures by creating firm size to deviate from their ideal, or by blocking the flow

of capital and other money-related management to small firms. Among these conceivable

consequences, i do not recognize them clearly.

5.2.8 Profitability and stock Price

My results in context to profitability has not any significant association with the stock

prices. It means that profitability has no impact on the stock prices. If there is an increase in the

profitability of the firms has no effect seen in stock prices in sugar industries that is totally

different from the other sectors due to disclosure of the full information to the general public for

the profitability. In Pakistan Sugar industries are completely governed by few landlord families

that has a monopoly in the market and make window dressing in disclosure of the information to

the general public. In Pakistan recently about the profitability, many cases are discovered by the

regulating authority. The word profitability consists of two words, especially, benefit and

capacity. In utilitarian terms, it is explained. It also shows control or conduct of a concern. The

gain can be described as being for winning an arrival from the use of a proposed initiative. While

utility is a clear essence, utility is a relative idea. Strictly defined and widely intensified are two

unique ideas of benefit and benefit. On this page, regardless of its non-exclusive qualifications,

one has an integral part of the business world. As a proper term, utility is of no importance. High

benefits do not show robust robust hierarchical competence, and low efficiency is often not an

indicator of a competent disorder. In this way, it can tell, the primary variable of the advantage

that can be looked at the operational efficiency and monetary efficiency of a review. Use is

return as perhaps the best methodology in income research to gauge the effectiveness of capital

and to quantify operational productivity. Benefit is the capacity of an association, venture,

organization and friends to make a benefit by utilizing all the business use and playing out all

capacities and procedures. It shows the executives proficiency to make benefits utilizing all the

innovativeness in the market. This choice is the nature of making benefits using an agency in

producing. The word gains doesn't look like profitability, since the benefit is perceived to gauge

firm and employment, profitability, and this can be expanded by movement in effectiveness the

102

executives. Gains are utilized to gauge firm profitability; however, it's anything but a last

confirmation of proficiency. Be that as it may, it is as yet thought to be wasteful, and in some

cases a powerful firm makes a noteworthy benefit. Net benefit shows the distinction between

salary and costs. In the event that the status of a firm change, it is just by a factor and this factor.

Productivity is the factor that is fundamental to benefit is required. In these variables, income per

share (EPS) is return as the premise and generally significant for controlling the proportion of

firm gains and firm productivity. (SHARMA 2011) ) appears in the exploration paper that EPS is

the significant determinant of the market track and has been inspected by thinking about a

specific part. They considered the EPS factor. (Faris Nasif AL-Febiri, 2010) led the investigation

with relapse analysis and per-share with advertised price per share. He presumed that

macroeconomic elements affected stock prices. (Garvey and Milbmyn, 2002) researched that

stock prices incorporate that representatives don't put resource into stocks. On the stock trade, i

are attempting to demonstrate to act with the stock choice. (Li and Wong, 2005) depict that the

stock price desire is less than the conventional valuation strategy and closer to the real stock

price as indicated by the warrant estimating technique.

5.3 Implications of the study

My study has various important implications that relate to theory, regulatory authority,

policymakers, users of the financial information, Academia and the researchers.

5.3.1 Implications to Theory

Studies on corporate governance often arise from the agency perspective where

companies use corporate governance mechanisms to control agency conflict between companies.

These mechanisms include the board of directors, property structure, auditors and audit

committee established to minimize the conflict between management and shareholders within

companies. The results of this study reinforce the strength of agency theory in explaining

corporate governance practices and the up-to-date financial reports in the Jordanian context.

While previous studies focused solely on evaluating the efficiency of the corporate governance

system in minimizing agency conflict by calculating earnings management, firm performance,

and disclosure, this study aims to support the assumption that the time of financial reports in the

agency theory is invaluable. A tool to minimize agency conflict. The results are useful for

researchers as they facilitate empirical evidence of agency conflicts in a developing country such

as Pakistan.

This study is consistent with agency theory, which suggests that the existence of

corporate governance structure leads to a reduction in the monitoring of management and the

103

occurrence of mismanagement and financial reporting and stock prices, thus improving stock

price and reporting standards (Afify,2009).

5.3.2 Implications to the Regulatory Authorities and Policy Makers

The Corporate Governance Principles in Pakistan focus on effective governance

principles for the development and accountability of capital markets. In this context, the Pakistan

Securities Commission established a corporate governance code for companies traded on the

Pakistan Stock Exchange in 2006-15. The main purpose behind these rules is to support the

duties and responsibilities of the board of directors and audit committees in such firms. Although

the Jordanian government has attempted to endorse best governance practices in the country's

firms, various researchers and regulators have been pessimistic about whether the governance of

developing countries can function effectively in a country characterized by a different legal

system, enterprise, and the same standard culture and institutional structure.

This study provides a clear view to understanding the impact of ownership concentration

on stock price companies. This was help regulatory agencies such as the Pakistan Securities

Commission to evaluate existing listing requirements and assess the existing ownership structure

in Pakistani companies. Also, this study provides an awareness and understanding of the bodies

and interested parties as to whether existing corporate governance practices in Pakistan

companies produce the expected results. Also, this study provides an approach to policymakers

and regulators in the formulation of policies and strategies related to stock prices.

5.3.3 Implications for Financial Statements Users

Financial analysts primarily assist in making investment decisions and in analyzing the

financial reports to follow up with the company’s representatives to obtain a deeper

understanding of the prospect and managerial effectiveness of the firm. Hence, this study’s

results have considerable significance to the financial analysts as the results shed light on the

factors contributing to the financial reporting practices’ timeliness and help them in their

effective assessment of the financial report.

Another party that benefits from the results of this study is the creditor as the results bring

forward a basis for the assessment of the client. Prior studies reported that creditors demand

higher stock price, and, in some instances, creditors are more wary of companies that are

characterized as manipulators of financial reporting, a practice that tends to delay the publication

of financial information. Furthermore, auditors can also get benefit from the results of this study

as they are concerned with planning the audit task and with maintaining the quality of audit by

104

completing audit functions on time.

5.3.4 Implications to the Researchers

Several previous studies have examined the relationship between stock management and

stock management mechanisms. This study has the advantage of encaging researchers to explore

a more comprehensive period to generalize the results and provide invaluable interpretations.

Besides, although the intensity of ownership is a different factor in Asian developing countries

such as Pakistan, studies to examine the timeliness among Pakistani firms have failed to include

ownership intensity in the discussions. The results of this study can shed light on the effect of the

concentrated owners on the stock price and the governance mechanisms of the companies in

Pakistan. They was help researchers provide empirical evidence related to agency conflict in a

developing country, meaning Pakistan's diverse environment provides additional information

about the impact of concentrated ownership on stock prices. This study contributes to the

corporate governance literature and motivates future studies to further examine stock prices with

some economic diligence in other developing countries.

5.4 Limitations of this Study

This study provides a clear vision of how the corporate governance structure in

developing countries' stock price changing. This study has some limitations that should be

highlighted to warrant a fair interpretation of the results.

1. Due to the lack of disclosure of Pakistani companies, this study did not include all

aspects of the audit committee (e.g. size, meetings, independence, and financial

experience). This is difficult because this data is not public. Therefore, this study

is limited to examining the presence of audit committees in the firms listed in

Pakistan.

2. This study explores the corporate governance and economics attributes among

Pakistan listed firms, particularly for industrial and services companies over the

year 2009 to 2012. In this study, the financial sector is excluded because it has

special regulations issued by the regulated Central Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and

the Insurance Commission. Future studies may investigate the same period, but

particularly in the financial sector, to identify the trend of stock prices in the financial

sector.

3. Due to the limitations of the availability of data, this study did not examine other

variables that may affect the stock price. For example, the age of directors’

members and length of service on board of directors appointed to the board.

105

5.5 Suggestions for Future Research

Extension of this study is possible in the following fields:

1. Further research is needed to provide further insight into the role of firms’

governance mechanisms and stock prices of Pakistani listed forms. It would also

be very interesting to extend the current study to other countries in the Middle

East or other emerging countries to focus on the role of corporate governance on

the stock prices and determine whether the mechanisms of corporate governance

enhance the level of stock prices in these markets.

2. This study is limited in the sense that it only considers specific determinants of

the stock price. It would be worthwhile to incorporate other variables of

ownership structure (i.e., family ownership, managerial ownership) or other

measures of disclosure quality and other variables of the board of directors (such

as the board gender). Besides, future research may consider other characteristics

of the audit committee, such as audit committee size, independence, meeting, and

financial expertise.

3. This study is based on ownership concentration to evaluate the effectiveness of

the corporate governance structure in Pakistani firms. Therefore, future research

should focus on other variables as moderators to provide a deeper understanding

of the effectiveness of corporate governance and their relationship with the stock

prices.

4. Further studies could be conducted to discover the effect of other variables apart

from the corporate governance on the stock prices, such as other management

characteristics.

5. Further studies can also be undertaken on the non-listed companies in Pakistan

with a comparison of the findings with the results of the current study to highlight

the differences between the two groups.

106

References

Abarca, N., L. Fuentes, N. Majluf, and D. Rodríguez. 1998. Governance and ownership in Chilean

economic groups: ABANTE.

Abdullah, S. N. J. C. G. T. i. j. o. b. i. s. 2006. Board structure and ownership in Malaysia: The case of

distressed listed companies.

Abdullahi, B., F. J. G. J. o. M. Izedonmi, and B. Research. 2011. The Effects of Macroeconomic Factors

on the Nigerian Stock Returns: A Sectoral Approach. 11 (7):3-7.

Abdullatif, M., and H. A. J. I. J. o. A. Al‐Khadash. 2010. Putting audit approaches in context: The case of

business risk audits in Jordan. 14 (1):1-24.

Acemoglu, D., and F. J. J. o. p. e. Zilibotti. 1997. Was Prometheus unbound by chance? Risk,

diversification, and growth. 105 (4):709-751.

Addo, A., F. J. E. J. o. B. Sunzuoye, and Economics. 2013. The impact of treasury bill rate and interest

rate on the stock market returns: Case of Ghana stock exchange. 8 (2).

Agle, B. R., R. K. Mitchell, and J. A. J. A. o. m. j. Sonnenfeld. 1999. Who matters to Ceos? An

investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corpate performance, and Ceo values. 42

(5):507-525.

Agrawal, A., G. N. J. J. o. F. Mandelker, and Q. analysis. 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of

managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments.143-161.

Al-Abedallat, A., and D. J. I. J. o. F. R. Al-Shabib. 2012. Effects of Macroeconomic Variables Non Stock

Market: Saudi Perspective. 5 (4):120-127.

Al-Jafari, M. K., R. M. Salameh, M. R. J. I. R. J. o. F. Habbash, and Economics. 2011. Investigating the

relationship between stock market returns and macroeconomic variables: evidence from developed

and emerging markets. 79:6-30.

Al-Shubiri, F. N. J. I. J. o. B., and Management. 2010. Analysis the determinants of market stock price

movements: An empirical study of Jordanian commercial banks. 5 (10):137.

Al Masry, A., A. Debes, and M. J. A. J. o. B. R. I. El Baradie. 2015. Islamic & Commercial Banking

Systems A Theoretical Comparison. 1178 (8933):8933.

Alvarez, S. A., and J. B. J. J. o. m. Barney. 2005. How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions

of uncertainty? 31 (5):776-793.

107

Andersson, B., and M. T. Rizwan. 2009. Karlstad Business School.

Arnold, B., and P. J. C. P. o. A. De Lange. 2004. Enron: an examination of agency problems. 15 (6-

7):751-765.

Arouri, M. E. H., A. Lahiani, M. J. I. J. o. E. Bellalah, and Finance. 2010. Oil price shocks and stock

market returns in oil-exporting countries: The case of GCC countries. 2 (5):132-139.

Asaolu, T., and M. J. A. j. o. b. m. Ogunmuyiwa. 2011. An econometric analysis of the impact of

macroecomomic variables on stock market movement in Nigeria. 3 (1):72-78.

Aydemir, A. C., M. Gallmeyer, and B. J. T. S. o. B. Hollifield. 2007. Financial leverage and the leverage

effect-a market and firm analysis.142.

Ballwieser, W. 1987. Auditing in an agency setting. In Agency Theory, Information, and Incentives:

Springer, 327-346.

Banerjee, A. V., and A. F. J. J. o. p. e. Newman. 1993. Occupational choice and the process of

development. 101 (2):274-298.

Barker, J. J., B. Tenenbaum, and F. Woolf. 1997. Governance and regulation of power pools and system

operators: An international comparison: The World Bank.

Basher, S. A., and P. J. G. f. j. Sadorsky. 2006. Oil price risk and emerging stock markets. 17 (2):224-

251.

Bazerman, M. H., K. P. Morgan, and G. F. J. S. M. R. Loewenstein. 1997. The impossibility of auditor

independence. 38:89-94.

Berman, S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha, and T. M. J. A. o. M. j. Jones. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation

matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial

performance. 42 (5):488-506.

Bhattacharya, B., and J. Mukherjee. 2002. The nature of the causal relationship between stock market and

macroeconomic aggregates in India: An empirical analysis. Paper read at 4th annual conference on

money and finance, Mumbai.

Blume-Kohout, R. J. N. J. o. P. 2010. Optimal, reliable estimation of quantum states. 12 (4):043034.

Boote, D. N., and P. J. E. r. Beile. 2005. Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation

literature review in research preparation. 34 (6):3-15.

Boubaker, S., H. J. R. o. A. Sami, and Finance. 2011. Multiple large shareholders and earnings

informativeness.

108

Brown, C., and F. J. J. o. E. Abraham. 2012. Sum of Perpetuities Method for Valuing Stock Prices. 38

(1).

Brunello, G., C. Graziano, B. M. J. J. o. B. Parigi, and Finance. 2003. CEO turnover in insider-dominated

boards: The Italian case. 27 (6):1027-1051.

Bruno, V., and H. S. J. J. o. M. E. Shin. 2015. Capital flows and the risk-taking channel of monetary

policy. 71:119-132.

Busch, C., and A. J. K. S. E. I. W. P. Lassmann. 2010. From Rags to Riches: How Robust is the Influence

of Culture on Entrepreneurial Activity? (267).

Bushee, B. J. J. A. r. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment

behavior.305-333.

Bushman, R. M., J. D. Piotroski, and A. J. J. J. o. a. r. Smith. 2004. What determines corporate

transparency? 42 (2):207-252.

Campbell, J. Y., M. Lettau, B. G. Malkiel, and Y. J. T. j. o. f. Xu. 2001. Have individual stocks become

more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. 56 (1):1-43.

Cebenoyan, A. S., E. S. Cooperman, and C. A. J. F. M. Register. 1995. Deregulation, reregulation, equity

ownership, and S&L risk-taking.63-76.

Chatrath, A., S. Ramchander, and F. J. A. F. E. Song. 1997. Stock prices, inflation and output: evidence

from India. 7 (4):439-445.

Chow, C. W., and S. J. J. A. R. Rice. 1982. Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching.326-335.

Chun, M. M. J. N. 2011. Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. 49

(6):1407-1409.

Chung, R., M. Firth, and J.-B. J. J. o. c. f. Kim. 2002. Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings

management. 8 (1):29-48.

Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. Fan, and L. H. J. T. j. o. f. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and

entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. 57 (6):2741-2771.

Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. C. J. T. W. B. R. O. Xu. 2000. Corporate performance in the East Asian

financial crisis. 15 (1):23-46.

Corwin, S. A. J. T. J. o. F. 2003. The determinants of underpricing for seasoned equity offers. 58

(5):2249-2279.

109

Crossland, C., and D. C. J. S. M. J. Hambrick. 2007. How national systems differ in their constraints on

corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. 28 (8):767-789.

Culpan, R., J. J. B. Trussel, and S. Review. 2005. Applying the agency and stakeholder theories to the

Enron debacle: An ethical perspective. 110 (1):59-76.

Cummings, T., and A. M. J. S. M. J. Knott. 2018. Outside CEOs and innovation. 39 (8):2095-2119.

Danbolt, J., I. Hirst, and E. J. T. B. A. R. Jones. 2018. Gaming the FTSE 100 index. 50 (4):364-378.

DeFina, R. H. J. B. r. 1991. Does inflation depress the stock market? (Nov):3-12.

Demsetz, H., and K. J. J. o. p. e. Lehn. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and

consequences. 93 (6):1155-1177.

Deshmukh, A., S. M. Schima, M. D. White, A. J. Arouni, and M. J. J. T. J. o. h. v. d. Holmberg. 2012.

Right-heart failure and hypotension after arteriovenous graft placement in a patient with idiopathic

tricuspid annular dilatation. 21 (3):406-407.

Dichev, I. D., J. D. J. J. o. B. F. Piotroski, and Accounting. 1999. The performance of long‐run stock

returns following issues of public and private debt. 26 (9‐10):1103-1132.

Disegna, M. 2007. Dal Macro al Micro Marketing: modelli statistici per valutare l'efficacia pubblicitaria

sul punto vendita.

Duggal, R., and J. A. J. J. o. C. F. Millar. 1999. Institutional ownership and firm performance: The case of

bidder returns. 5 (2):103-117.

Durham, J. B. J. E. M. R. 2002. The effects of stock market development on growth and private

investment in lower-income countries. 3 (3):211-232.

Eckbo, B. E. J. J. o. F. e. 1986. Valuation effects of corporate debt offerings. 15 (1-2):119-151.

Eisenhardt, K. M. J. A. o. m. r. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. 14 (1):57-74.

Elumilade, D., T. Asaolu, A. J. I. R. J. o. F. Ologunde, and Economics. 2006. Capital budgeting and

economic development in the third world: the case of Nigeria. 2 (2):136-152.

Er, Ş., B. J. I. J. o. B. Vuran, and S. Research. 2012. Factors Affecting Stock Returns of Firms Quoted in

ISE Market: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. 2 (1):109-122.

Ewing, B. T., and F. J. G. F. J. Malik. 2016. Volatility spillovers between oil prices and the stock market

under structural breaks. 29:12-23.

Ewing, B. T., and M. A. J. E. P. Thompson. 2007. Dynamic cyclical comovements of oil prices with

110

industrial production, consumer prices, unemployment, and stock prices. 35 (11):5535-5540.

Faccio, M., and L. H. J. J. o. f. e. Lang. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations.

65 (3):365-395.

Fama, E. F., M. C. J. T. j. o. l. Jensen, and Economics. 1983. Agency problems and residual claims. 26

(2):327-349.

Farhi, E., S. P. Fraiberger, X. Gabaix, R. Ranciere, and A. Verdelhan. 2009. Crash risk in currency

markets: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Fazli, S., S. Shlan, S. Radsar, and M. J. M. S. L. Radsar. 2014. An investigation on the relationship

between arbitrage and macro-economic indicators: A case study of Tehran Stock Exchange. 4

(4):635-640.

Fernandes, B., J. Cunha, P. J. R. Ferreira, and S. E. Reviews. 2011. The use of real options approach in

energy sector investments. 15 (9):4491-4497.

Finkelstein, S., D. Hambrick, and A. A. J. S. P. W. E. P. Cannella. 1996. Strategic leadership.

Firmansyah, S., L. J. J. o. B. Purnamasari, and Banking. 2017. Pengaruh profitability, liquidity, leverage,

dan interest rates terhadap stock return untuk LQ-45 Index. 7 (1):77-90.

Fisman, R., and I. J. J. o. t. E. E. A. Love. 2007. Financial dependence and growth revisited. 5 (2-3):470-

479.

Flannery, M. J., and A. A. J. T. r. o. f. s. Protopapadakis. 2002. Macroeconomic factors do influence

aggregate stock returns. 15 (3):751-782.

Galai, D., and R. W. J. J. o. F. e. Masulis. 1976. The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock. 3

(1-2):53-81.

Garratt, A., K. Lee, M. Hashem Pesaran, and Y. J. T. E. J. Shin. 2003. A long run structural

macroeconometric model of the UK. 113 (487):412-455.

George, T. J., and C. y. J. T. J. o. f. Hwang. 2007. Long‐term return reversals: overreaction or taxes? 62

(6):2865-2896.

Geroski, P. A., S. J. Machin, and C. F. J. T. J. o. I. E. Walters. 1997. Corporate growth and profitability.

45 (2):171-189.

Ghani, W. I., and J. Ashraf. 2005. Corporate governance, business group affiliation, and firm

performance: Descriptive evidence from Pakistan: East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.

111

Gillan, S., J. C. Hartzell, and L. T. J. W. c. f. c. g. w. p. Starks. 2003. Explaining corporate governance:

Boards, bylaws, and charter provisions. (2003-03).

Gillan, S. L., and L. T. J. J. o. f. E. Starks. 2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder

activism: The role of institutional investors. 57 (2):275-305.

Glickman, M. J. J. o. P. K. E. 2000. Seeking explanations not preserving theorems: Corporate finance,

confidence, asymmetric information, and the UK macroeconomy. 23 (2):201-233.

Gorton, G., and M. Kahl. 1999. Blockholder identity, equity ownership structures, and hostile takeovers:

National bureau of economic research.

Graves, S. B., and S. A. J. A. o. M. j. Waddock. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social

performance. 37 (4):1034-1046.

Grier, P., E. J. J. J. o. E. Zychowicz, and Business. 1994. Institutional investors, corporate discipline, and

the role of debt. 46 (1):1-11.

Gutiérrez, G., and T. Philippon. 2016. Investment-less growth: An empirical investigation: National

Bureau of Economic Research.

Han, J., J. He, Z. Pan, and J. J. A. Shi. 2018. Twenty years of accounting and finance research on the

Chinese capital market. 54 (4):576-599.

Hartzell, J. C., and L. T. J. T. j. o. f. Starks. 2003. Institutional investors and executive compensation. 58

(6):2351-2374.

Hasan, A., M. J. I. J. o. P. PEKCANDANOĞLU, and Security. 2020. Evaluation of Developments in

Afghanistan in the Context of Foreign Policy and Security Issues. 2 (3):135-158.

Hill, C. W., and T. M. J. J. o. m. s. Jones. 1992. Stakeholder‐agency theory. 29 (2):131-154.

Hoi, C. K., Q. Wu, and H. J. T. A. R. Zhang. 2013. Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated

with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. 88 (6):2025-2059.

Humpe, A., and P. J. A. f. e. Macmillan. 2009. Can macroeconomic variables explain long-term stock

market movements? A comparison of the US and Japan. 19 (2):111-119.

Hussain, A., D. A. REHMAN, A. SIDDIQUE, H. U. J. J. o. B. REHMAN, and Tourism. 2018. Impact of

Ownership Structure on Bank Risk Taking: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional Banks and

Islamic Banks of Pakistan. 4:175-181.

Hussain, M. I., L. González, C. Souto, and M. J. A. S. Reigosa. 2011. Ecophysiological responses of three

112

native herbs to phytotoxic potential of invasive Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. 83 (2):149.

Hýsek, J., M. Češka, and V. Janoušek. 2009. Model-Based Design and Verification of Reactive Systems.

Paper read at International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory.

Iannotta, G., G. Nocera, A. J. J. o. b. Sironi, and finance. 2007. Ownership structure, risk and performance

in the European banking industry. 31 (7):2127-2149.

Ibrahim, M. H., and H. J. J. o. e. s. Aziz. 2003. Macroeconomic variables and the Malaysian equity

market.

Javid, A. Y., and R. J. T. P. D. R. Iqbal. 2008. Ownership concentration, corporate governance and firm

performance: Evidence from Pakistan.643-659.

Jebran, K., S. Chen, R. J. R. i. I. B. Zhang, and Finance. 2020. Board diversity and stock price crash risk.

51:101122.

Jensen, M. C., and W. H. J. J. o. f. e. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency

costs and ownership structure. 3 (4):305-360.

Kamel, B., S. Wahba, K. Nassar, and A. Abdelsalam. 2012. Effectiveness of green-roof on reducing

energy consumption through simulation program for a residential building: Cairo, Egypt. Paper

read at Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World.

Kandir, S. Y. J. I. r. j. o. f., and economics. 2008. Macroeconomic variables, firm characteristics and stock

returns: Evidence from Turkey. 16 (1):35-45.

Karaca, S. S., and I. H. J. I. B. R. Eksi. 2012. The relationship between ownership structure and firm

performance: An empirical analysis over Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) listed companies. 5

(1):172.

Khalid, M., M. Altaf, M. M. M. Bagram, and H. J. T. J. o. C. Hussain. 2012. Long-run relationship of

macroeconomic variables and stock returns: evidence from Karachi stock exchange (KSE) 100

index. 4 (3):45.

Kogut, B., and N. J. C. m. r. Kulatilaka. 1994a. Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in

opportunity. 36 (2):52-71.

Kogut, B., and N. J. M. s. Kulatilaka. 1994b. Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option

value of a multinational network. 40 (1):123-139.

Kurawa, J. M., S. J. J. o. M. A. Garba, and Auditing. 2014. An evaluation of the effect of credit risk

management (CRM) on the profitability of Nigerian banks. 10 (1):104.

113

L'Her, J., T. Masmoudi, and J. J. C. I. R. Suret. 2002. Size effects and book to market in Canada. 1:1-37.

La Porta, R., F. Lopez‐de‐Silanes, and A. J. T. j. o. f. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the

world. 54 (2):471-517.

Lee, K. C., and C. C. J. J. o. I. B. S. Kwok. 1988. Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations:

International environmental factors and determinants of capital structure. 19 (2):195-217.

Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. J. J. o. f. e. Wysocki. 2003. Investor protection and earnings management: An

international comparison. 69 (3):505-527.

Levine, R., and S. J. A. e. r. Zervos. 1998. Stock markets, banks, and economic growth.537-558.

Li, Y. D., T. B. İşcan, K. J. J. o. i. m. Xu, and finance. 2010. The impact of monetary policy shocks on

stock prices: Evidence from Canada and the United States. 29 (5):876-896.

Lise, W., and K. J. E. e. Van Montfort. 2007. Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is there a co‐

integration relationship? 29 (6):1166-1178.

Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. J. A. o. m. R. Dess. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct

and linking it to performance. 21 (1):135-172.

Macve, R. J. A., and b. research. 2010. Conceptual frameworks of accounting: some brief reflections on

theory and practice. 40 (3):303-308.

Maher, M., and T. J. A. a. S. Andersson. 2000. Corporate governance: effects on firm performance and

economic growth.

Mccall, J., S. J. Grossman, O. D. Hart, and E. S. J. Grossman. 1982. 4 Corporate Financial Structure and

Managerial Incentives.

Mills, J., K. Francis, and A. Bonner. 2005. Mentoring, clinical supervision and preceptoring: clarifying

the conceptual definitions for Australian rural nurses. A review of the literature.

Mintzberg, H. J. J. o. B. S. 1983. The case for corporate social responsibility.

Mishra, S., A. Sharif, S. Khuntia, M. S. Meo, and S. A. R. J. R. P. Khan. 2019. Does oil prices impede

Islamic stock indices? Fresh insights from wavelet-based quantile-on-quantile approach. 62:292-

304.

Mizruchi, M. S. J. T., and Society. 2004. Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large

US corporations. 33 (5):579-617.

Monks, R., A. Miller, and J. Cook. 2004. Shareholder activism on environmental issues: A study of

114

proposals at large US corporations (2000–2003). Paper read at Natural Resources Forum.

Monks, R. A., and N. Minow. 2003. Corporate Governance. 3rd: London, Blackwell.

Muradoglu, G., and S. J. C. B. S. Sivaprasad, London. 2006. Capital structure and firm Value: An

empirical analysis of Abnormal returns.

Mustafa, K., M. J. S. Nishat, and Development. 2010. Risk, return and trading volume relationship in an

emerging stock market: a case study of Karachi stock exchange.147-168.

Naldi, L., M. Nordqvist, K. Sjöberg, and J. J. F. b. r. Wiklund. 2007. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk

taking, and performance in family firms. 20 (1):33-47.

Nkechukwu, G., J. Onyeagba, J. J. I. J. o. S. Okoh, and Research. 2013. Macroeconomic variables and

stock market prices in Nigeria: A cointegration and vector error correction model tests. 4 (6):717-

724.

Omran, M. M., A. Bolbol, A. J. I. r. o. l. Fatheldin, and economics. 2008. Corporate governance and firm

performance in Arab equity markets: Does ownership concentration matter? 28 (1):32-45.

Onguka, D., E. S. Kaijage, C. M. Iraya, S. E. J. I. J. o. E. Kisaka, and Finance. 2019. Influence of

Corporate Control on Capital Structure for Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange.

11 (2):68-80.

Ouma, W. N., P. J. I. J. o. B. Muriu, and Commerce. 2014. The impact of macroeconomic variables on

stock market returns in Kenya. 3 (11):1-31.

Pontiff, J. J. J. o. A., and Economics. 2006. Costly arbitrage and the myth of idiosyncratic risk. 42 (1-

2):35-52.

Qamri, G. M., M. A. U. Haq, F. J. M. Akram, and Macroeconomics. 2015. The impact of inflation on

stock prices: Evidence from Pakistan. 3 (4):83-88.

Quinn, D. P., and T. M. J. A. o. M. R. Jones. 1995. An agent morality view of business policy. 20 (1):22-

42.

Raihan, S. 2009. Impact of food price rise on school enrollment and dropout in the poor and vulnerable

households in selected areas of Bangladesh.

Rajan, R. G., and L. Zingales. 2000. The governance of the new enterprise: National Bureau of Economic

Research.

Rajasekar, J. J. J. o. M. P., and Practice. 2013. A comparative analysis of mission statement content and

readability. 14 (6):131-147.

115

Randoy, T., J. Jenssen, and S. J. A. M. R. F. Goel, Norway. 2003. Family firms and good corporate

governance: Altruism and agency considerations.

Reeb, D. M., C. C. Kwok, and H. Y. J. J. o. I. B. S. Baek. 1998. Systematic risk of the multinational

corporation. 29 (2):263-279.

Reinganum, M. R. J. T. J. o. P. M. 1999. The significance of market capitalization in portfolio

management over time. 25 (4):39-50.

Renneboog, L. J. J. o. b., and finance. 2000. Ownership, managerial control and the governance of

companies listed on the Brussels stock exchange. 24 (12):1959-1995.

Sadorsky, P. J. E. e. 1999. Oil price shocks and stock market activity. 21 (5):449-469.

Sah, R. K., and J. E. J. T. A. E. R. Stiglitz. 1986. The economics of price scissors: Reply. 76 (5):1195-

1199.

Samontaray, D. P., S. Nugali, and B. J. I. J. o. F. R. Sasidhar. 2014. A study of the effect of

macroeconomic variables on stock market: Saudi Perspective. 5 (4):120-127.

Sarwar, A., A. Haque, F. J. I. J. o. A. R. i. E. Yasmin, and M. Sciences. 2013. The usage of social network

as a marketing tool: Malaysian Muslim consumers' perspective. 2 (1):93.

Saunders, A., E. Strock, and N. G. J. t. J. o. F. Travlos. 1990. Ownership structure, deregulation, and bank

risk taking. 45 (2):643-654.

Sciarelli, M. J. S. E. I. i. M. 2008. Resource-based theory and market-driven management. (2):66-80.

Shankman, N. A. J. J. o. B. E. 1999. Reframing the debate between agency and stakeholder theories of the

firm. 19 (4):319-334.

SHARMA, D. S. J. C. P. C. P. 2011. Stock Market Behaviour: Evidence From Asian Stock Markets.

Sharma, G. D., M. J. G. J. o. M. Mahendru, and B. Research. 2010. Impact of macro-economic variables

on stock prices in India. 10 (7).

Shifren, K. J. J. o. A. D. 2008. Early caregiving: Perceived parental relations and current social support.

15 (3-4):160.

Shleifer, A., and R. W. J. J. o. p. e. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. 94 (3, Part

1):461-488.

Singh, T., S. Mehta, M. J. J. o. e. Varsha, and i. finance. 2011. Macroeconomic factors and stock returns:

Evidence from Taiwan. 3 (4):217-227.

116

Sireesha, P. J. I. J. o. M., Financial Services, and M. Research. 2013. Effect of select macro economic

variables on stock returns in India. 2 (6).

Siregar, R., R. S. J. J. o. t. J. Rajan, and I. Economies. 2004. Impact of exchange rate volatility on

Indonesia's trade performance in the 1990s. 18 (2):218-240.

Skerratt, L. J. A., and B. Research. 1982. Risk Distribution in the Budgetary Process: A Comment. 12

(47):233-235.

Steier, L. J. J. o. B. V. 2003. Variants of agency contracts in family-financed ventures as a continuum of

familial altruistic and market rationalities. 18 (5):597-618.

Tandon, K., N. J. I. J. o. R. i. M. Malhotra, and Technology. 2013. Determinants of stock prices:

Empirical evidence from NSE 100 companies. 3 (3):2249-9563.

Tursoy, T., N. Gunsel, H. J. I. R. J. o. F. Rjoub, and Economics. 2008. Macroeconomic factors, the APT

and the Istanbul stock market. 22:49-57.

Uddin, M. B. J. J. o. m. A., and Auditing. 2009. Determinants of market price of stock: A study on bank

leasing and insurance companies of Bangladesh. 5 (7):1.

Valadares, S. M., and R. P. J. A. a. S. Leal. 2000. Ownership and control structure of Brazilian

companies.

Wahal, S., and J. J. J. J. o. c. F. McConnell. 2000. Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial

myopia? 6 (3):307-329.

Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild, K. L. J. J. o. a. Wild, and economics. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting

choices, and informativeness of earnings. 20 (1):61-91.

Watts, R. L., J. L. J. T. j. o. l. Zimmerman, and Economics. 1983. Agency problems, auditing, and the

theory of the firm: Some evidence. 26 (3):613-633.

Wesson, N., and M. J. J. A. C. Botha. 2019. The effect of share repurchases on corporate investment

policies: The South African experience. 19 (1):1-11.

White, M. M., R. J. I. R. J. o. F. Mala, and Economics. 2006. Assessment of an emerging stock market:

the case for Fiji's stock market. 6:116-132.

Wiwattanakantang, Y. J. P.-B. F. J. 2001. Controlling shareholders and corporate value: Evidence from

Thailand. 9 (4):323-362.

Woolridge, J. R., and C. C. J. S. m. j. Snow. 1990. Stock market reaction to strategic investment

decisions. 11 (5):353-363.

117

Yahyazadehfar, M., and A. J. M.-E. J. o. S. R. Babaie. 2012. Macroeconomic variables and stock price:

new evidence from Iran. 11 (4):408-415.

Yang, Y.-C., E. Piek, J. Zavadil, D. Liang, D. Xie, J. Heyer, P. Pavlidis, R. Kucherlapati, A. B. Roberts,

and E. P. J. P. o. t. N. A. o. S. Böttinger. 2003. Hierarchical model of gene regulation by

transforming growth factor β. 100 (18):10269-10274.

Yannis, G., E. Papadimitriou, and K. J. S. s. Folla. 2014. Effect of GDP changes on road traffic fatalities.

63:42-49.

Yasser, Q. R., and A. J. J. o. A. B. S. Al Mamun. 2015. Effects of ownership concentration on firm

performance: Pakistani evidence.

Zahra, S. A. J. F. b. r. 2005. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. 18 (1):23-40.

Zaighum, I. J. J. o. M. S. 2014. Impact of macroeconomic factors on non-financial firms stock returns:

Evidence from sectorial study of KSE-100 index. 1 (1):35-48.

Zubairi, H. J., and S. Farooq. 2011. Testing the validity of CAPM and APT in the oil, gas and fertilizer

companies listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange. Paper read at 2012 Financial Markets &

Corporate Governance Conference.

118

Appendix A

The Appendix are shown on the next page.

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

GR

AP

H:

Un

dern

oted

are the g

raph o

f the v

ariables:

1.2

E+

13

1.0

E+

13

8.0

E+

12

6.0

E+

12

4.0

E+

12

2.0

E+

12

0.0

E+

00

-2.0

E+

12

CE

OD

FS

OC

N

SP

CR

OS

SID

GD

P

OP

DA

TE

ID

INF

PA

T

CE

OD

2

1

0

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

FS

36

,00

0,0

00

32

,00

0,0

00

28

,00

0,0

00

24

,00

0,0

00

20

,00

0,0

00

16

,00

0,0

00

12

,00

0,0

00

8,0

00

,00

0

4,0

00

,00

0

0

GD

P

1.1

2E

+13

1.0

8E

+13

1.0

4E

+13

1.0

0E

+13

9.6

0E

+12

9.2

0E

+12

8.8

0E

+12

8.4

0E

+12

8.0

0E

+12

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

INF

24

20

16

12

8

4

0

OC

N

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

OP

35

0

30

0

25

0

20

0

15

0

10

0

PA

T

12

0,0

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

,00

0

80

,00

0,0

00

60

,00

0,0

00

40

,00

0,0

00

20

,00

0,0

00

0

-20

,00

0,0

00

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

RE

SID

80

60

40

20

0

-20

-40

SP

30

0

25

0

20

0

15

0

10

0

50

0

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

1 -06

2 -06

3 -06

4 -06

5 -06

6 -06

7 -06

8 -06

9 -06

10 -06

11 -06

12 -06

13 -06

14 -06

15 -06

16 -06

17 -06

18 -06

19 -06

20 -06

21 -06

22 -06

23 -06

24 -06

25 -06

26 -06

TA

S

36

,00

0,0

00

32

,00

0,0

00

28

,00

0,0

00

24

,00

0,0

00

20

,00

0,0

00

16

,00

0,0

00

12

,00

0,0

00

8,0

00

,00

0

4,0

00

,00

0

0

TD

1,2

00

,00

0

1,0

00

,00

0

80

0,0

00

60

0,0

00

40

0,0

00

20

0,0

00

0

The Impact of Corporate Governance, Fundamental and ...

Documents

Transcript of The Impact of Corporate Governance, Fundamental and ...