THE HISTORY OF CAPTIVE INSURANCE TAXATION · 2018-04-14 · Captive Academy of the 14th Annual...
Transcript of THE HISTORY OF CAPTIVE INSURANCE TAXATION · 2018-04-14 · Captive Academy of the 14th Annual...
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
THE HISTORY OF CAPTIVE INSURANCE TAXATION
Presented by:
Dan Kusaila, Tax Partner, Saslow Lufkin & Buggy, LLP
September 16, 2013
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Agenda
─ Role of Accounting Firm
─ Types of Taxes
─ The importance of Qualifying as Insurance for Tax
─ History of the war with the IRS
─ What constitutes insurance for tax
─ Ways to achieve risk distribution
─ 831(b) Captives
2
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Role of Accounting Firm
3
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Role of Accounting Firm
─ Auditing
─ Accounting Consulting
─ Tax Compliance
─ Tax Consulting
4
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Role of Accounting Firm (Cont’d)
Auditing
─ Annual Compliance with Audited Financial Statements • Due June 30th of each year
─ Non-Qualified Opinion desired • Qualified= not necessarily bad, but not clean
Loan Backs
No actuary report
Taxes
• Disclaimer= can not give an opinion
─ Assist with Footnote Disclosure
5
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Auditing- Process
─ Planning
• Review for risk areas
─ Test of Controls
• Walk through
• Claims testing
• Expense testing
─ Year end field work
• Testing and sample of transactions
─ Financial Statement preparation
─ Captive manager/client review
─ Issue
6
Role of Accounting Firm (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Auditing- Process (Cont’d)
─ Financial Statement preparation
─ Captive manager/client review
─ Rep Letter- Issue
Role of Accounting Firm (Cont’d)
7
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Auditing, Other Functions
– Assistance with Feasibility Studies
– Assistance Structuring Captive Arrangements
– Technical Accounting Assistance
– Agreed Upon Procedures
• Internal Control Testing
• Ensure internal policies and procedures are being followed
• Review of bookkeeping
8
Role of Accounting Firm (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Tax
– Tax compliance
• Tax return preparation
– Tax Accrual Assistance for Audited Financial Statements
– Assistance structuring captive companies and transactions
– Tax Consulting
– Private Letter Rulings
– Tax Opinions
Often act as Client’s tax department
Role of Accounting Firm (Cont’d)
9
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Types of Taxes
─ Federal Income Taxes
─ Federal Excise Taxes
─ State Premium Taxes
─ Self-Procurement Taxes
─ State Income Taxes
10
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Types of Taxes (Cont’d)
Federal Income Taxes
─ Non-Insurance Company • Form 1120 • Form 1065 • Form 990 • Others
─ Insurance Company- Form 1120-PC
11
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Tax Reporting Requirements
– Consolidated Returns
• Parent and subs (including captive) file consolidated
• Tax year can follow parent’s tax year
• 1120PC form will be prepared until taxable income; included by “stacking”
• Estimated tax payments done at corporate level
• Captive will still need separate tax ID (EIN)
Types of Taxes (Cont’d)
12
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Tax Reporting Requirements (Cont’d)
– Stand Alone Returns
• Parent and subs all file separately
• Tax year must follow calendar year pursuant to section 843 of Code
• 1120PC form will be filed stand alone
• As part of “controlled group” rules only 1 entity in group receives graduated rates
• Estimated tax payments done at captive level
– Same reporting rules apply to non-insurance captives (“regular” 1120 corporate return)
13
Types of Taxes (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Federal Income Taxes
─ Captive subject to tax on worldwide income
─ Special treatment:
• Loss reserves (discounting)
• Unearned premiums
Advanced Premium
• Deferred acquisition costs
• Capital losses
• Proration
─ Consolidated tax returns
Types of Taxes (Cont’d)
14
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Federal Excise Tax - Basics Federal excise tax (“FET”) applies to premiums paid to foreign
insurer/reinsurer covering U.S. risks
4% FET on direct property and casualty policies
1% FET on reinsurance of U.S. risks
Withheld and remitted quarterly by U.S. premium payer
Not applicable if captive makes an IRC § 953(d) onshore tax election
IRS “cascading” theory for applying FET
15
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Rev. Rul. 2008-15 – Federal Excise Tax
Excise tax under § 4371 has a “cascading” effect
─ Tax applies to premiums paid to cover U.S. risks regardless of the nationality of the insuring and/or reinsuring entities
• Applies to payments from one foreign insurance company to another foreign insurance company if the underlying risks are U.S. situs risks
• Ann. 2008-18 sets out a voluntary compliance initiative for foreign insurers and reinsurers that owe FET on foreign-to-foreign reinsurance transactions
Applies to FET on premiums received on or after October 1, 2008
IRS will not examine cascading tax liabilities from prior periods
16
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─FET applies to both transactions ─US Insured and Foreign Insurer are both liable for tax on first
transaction ─US Insured NOT liable for tax on second transaction per Treas. Reg. §46.4374-1(a)
US Insured with US risk
Foreign Insurer Foreign Reinsurer
Rev. Rul. 2008-15: Scenario 1
17
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ No FET treaty exemptions apply ─ FET applies to both reinsurance transactions
US Risks US Insurer Foreign Reinsurer A Foreign Reinsurer B
Rev. Rul. 2008-15: Scenario 2
18
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─Foreign Insurer is eligible for FET treaty exemption but Foreign Reinsurer is not
─FET applies to both transactions ─The reinsurance transaction with the ineligible Foreign Reinsurer
nullified the treaty exemption with respect to the first transaction
US Insured with US risk Foreign Insurer Foreign Reinsurer
Rev. Rul. 2008-15: Scenario 3
19
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─Foreign Insurer is eligible for FET treaty exemption but only if the insurance transaction is not part of a “conduit arrangement”
─Direct insurance transaction is assumed to not be a conduit arrangement
─No FET applies to the direct insurance transaction ─FET applies to the reinsurance transaction
US Insured with US risk Foreign Insurer Foreign Reinsurer
Rev. Rul. 2008-15: Scenario 4
20
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Interim Guidance Memo SBSE-04-0909-045 (Excise Taxes)
─Procedures for excise tax examiners ─ IRS indicated it will be auditing foreign captive subsidiaries ─Forward all information to International excise tax group
• Name and employer identification number (EIN) of the parent company;
• Full name and EIN of the captive subsidiary;
• Location or country of the captive subsidiary;
• Amount of premiums insured with the captive subsidiary; and
• Amount of premiums reinsured by the captive subsidiary to reinsurance companies (if known).
─Looking to enforce “cascading theory” under Rev. Rul. 2008-15
21
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Types of Taxes Excise Taxes
─ Premium = The agreed upon price or consideration for assuming or carrying the risk. It includes any additional charge or assessment payable under the agreement
─ The liability attaches when the premium is transferred to the foreign insurer or foreign reinsurer
─ Paid Quarterly ─ Insurance vs. Non-Insurance
22
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Types of Taxes (Cont’d)
─ Self Procurement Taxes: • Also called:
Direct Placement taxes. Direct Procurement Taxes. Taxes on independently procured insurance.
─ Statutes preserve right of insureds to place insurance
outside state.
─ Tax imposed on transaction where in-state customer deals directly with non-admitted insurance company; no regulation.
23
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─Florida
─Illinois
─Indiana
─Louisiana
─Michigan
─Mississippi
─Nebraska
─New Hampshire
─Oregon
─Wisconsin
State Income Taxes
24
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
State Income Taxes (Cont’d)
25
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
The Risk of Not Qualifying
26
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Insurance vs. Non-Insurance
─ More beneficial to be treated as insurance:
• Accelerated tax deductions (i.e. loss reserves).
• State tax benefits – Depends on each state’s definition.
─ Single Parent Captives most significant:
• Taxes are significant reasons the captive was formed.
• Insurance expense deduction would be denied at parent level.
• State income tax savings.
27
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Premium Considerations
─ If captive qualifies for tax position, premiums will be deductible from any brother-sister entities
─ Recommend arm’s length treatment
• Keep premium in captive until such time it’s prudent to dividend back
• Settle the premium with cash at front end of policy
─ Deductibility of premium is a wash between parent and captive at consolidation
28
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Premium Deductibility
“Brother-Sister” Insurance
Insurance
Parent
Oper. Sub
Oper. Sub
Oper. Sub
100%
Oper. Sub
Oper. Sub
Insurance Subsidiary
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
29
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Insurance vs. Non-Insurance ─ 831(b):
• Small Company Election to be taxed on investment income only.
• Greater of direct written premium or net written premium cannot exceed $1.2 million.
─ 501(c)(15): • Extremely small insurance companies can apply to
be taxed exempt. • Gross receipts cannot exceed $600,000 (aggregated
for entire controlled group). • Greater than 50% of gross receipts must be from
premium.
30
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Tax Treatment of Captives
* Self-Insurance Vehicle (IRS)
31
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Ins. Vs. Non
32
FACTS -
• Premiums 1,000,000
• Unearned Premiums ( 200,000)
• Total Earned Premium 800,000
• Change in unpaid Loss Reserves (400,000)
GAA Expenses (200,000)
Net Income 200,000
***FIRST YEAR OF OPERATIONS
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Insurance Company
Book Income 200,000
Adjustments:
Loss Res. Disc 40,000
UPR 40,000
Taxable Income 280,000
Ins. Vs. Non (Cont’d)
33
Non-Insurance Company
Book Income 200,000
Adjustments:
Premium (800,000)
Loss incurred 400,000
Taxable Income (200,000)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Tax Treatment of Captives 831(b) election No election
Affiliate Captive Affiliate Captive
Premium (1,200,000) 1,200,000 (1,200,000) 1,200,000
Book/Tax Adj
(1,200,000)
1,200,000
(1,200,000)
Taxable Income
1,200,000 0
0 0
Tax Rate 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34
Total Benefit 408,000
0
0
0
34
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
The History of the War with the IRS
Common Law - ─ Helvering v. LeGierse– 1941 Supreme Court estate tax
case which established ground works to what defines insurance. • Insurable risk • Risk shifted to insurer • Pooled
35
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d) IRS Strikes - The Economic Family Theory: ─ Revenue Ruling 77-316 – An insurance arrangement
between related corporations should be re-characterized as a “self-insurance” reserve within an “economic family”.
36
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Industry Fights Back - The Courts rule favorably: ─ Humana Inc. v. Commissioner ─ Gulf Oil Corp. v. Commissioner ─ AMERICO, Inc. v. Commissioner ─ The Harper Group v. Commissioner ─ Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Commissioner ─ Hospital Corp. of America v. Commissioner
37
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
The Courts Rule - Brother-Sister Insureds: ─ Humana Inc. v. Commissioner ─ Hospital Corp. of America v. Commissioner
38
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Brother-Sister Approach
Not Tax-Deductible Tax-Deductible (Note: Subsidiaries must be legal C corporations or other qualifying “associations” but NOT disregarded entities for tax purposes)
Parent
Captive
Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub 12 Subsidiaries inferred from Revenue Ruling 2002-90
Premium Payments
39
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
The Courts Rule - Unrelated Third Party Risk: ─ Gulf Oil Corp. v. Commissioner ─ AMERICO, Inc. v. Commissioner ─ The Harper Group v. Commissioner ─ Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Commissioner
40
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Common Mid Size Company Example Brother-sister and third-party risk
Parent
Captive
Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Sub Third Party/ Pool Risk
50% unrelated risk stated as a safe harbor from Revenue Ruling 2002-89
Tax-Deductible
Premium Payments
LLC
Ceded Premium
41
Third Party Risk
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
IRS Concedes – ─ Revenue Ruling 2001-31 – The IRS will no longer invoke the
economic family theory. • However, they will continue to challenge certain captive
insurance transactions based on facts and circumstances.
42
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
IRS Provides Guidance - ─ IRS & Treasury attempts at defining insurance: Rev. Rul. 2002-89 Rev. Rul. 2002-90 Rev. Rul. 2002-91 Rev. Rul. 2005-40 Rev. Rul. 2009-26
43
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Revenue Ruling 2002-89
• No insurance when 90% of the captive’s premium comes
from the parent. • Insurance - 50% of the captive’s premium are from the
parent, while the remaining 50% is from un-related business.
44
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Revenue Ruling 2002-90
• Captive with 12 brother-sister entities. • No related entity accounted for less than 5% and more
than 15% of the total risk.
45
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Revenue Ruling 2002-91
• Group captive involving a small group of unrelated
businesses. • No member owned more than 15% of the captive and
no member’s individual risk exceeded 15% of the total risk insured.
46
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Revenue Ruling 2005-40
• Risk Distribution (4 scenarios) No insurance- 1 unrelated insured No insurance- 2 insureds whereby one insured makes
up 90% of the premium No insurance- 12 brother/sister entities in which they
are disregarded entities for tax purposes Insurance- 12 SMLLC’s in which they all elect
to be taxed as a corporation
47
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Rev. Rul. 2009-26: Scenario 1
─ Assumptions: • Z is adequately capitalized
• Z operates at arms length with Y
• Z operates in accordance with state law
─ Ruling: Z is an insurance company because it has risk distribution as if it had insured 10,000 policyholders directly
10,000 Policyholders Commercial
multiline 10 states
Reinsurer
Z
Insurance Company
Y
90% premiums
90% risks
48
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Assume each “X” operating company is one of many insureds of its respective “Y” insurance company
─ Only risks of each “X” are reinsured with Z. All risks are the same risk in the same line of business
─ Had Z insured each of the “X” entities directly, it would have qualified as an insurance company
─ Ruling: Z is an insurance company
─ Same result in PLRs 200950016 and 200950017 (12/11/09)
Z
X-3 risk
X-1
X-2
X-3
Y-1
Y-2
Y-3
49
Rev. Rul. 2009-26: Scenario 2
The History of the War with the IRS (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
What Constitutes Insurance for Tax purposes
50
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
What Constitutes Insurance?
─ The IRS definition of an insurance company: • For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term
"insurance company" means any company more than half of the business of which during the taxable year is the issuing of insurance or annuity contracts or the reinsuring of risks underwritten by insurance companies.
─ The IRS does not define insurance contract! Therefore we
must look to the courts: • Insurance contract must have: Risk Shifting. Risk Distribution.
51
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Risk Shifting
─ In Helvering v. LeGierse, the Supreme Court said that for a transaction to be considered insurance, it must transfer the risk of loss from one party to another, among other points. That is Risk Shifting.
─ How risk shifting is defined by law, courts, and the IRS is the subject of much time and money. Captives have been at the center of this issue.
─ Have you shifted the risk? How much is needed to qualify (5, 10, 50 percent)? What about reinsurance? Who owns the captive?
─ Rev. Ruling 2002-89 states that 50% of unrelated business will
suffice for Risk Shifting.
─ Rev. Ruling 2002-90 states 12 subs whereby no one sub makes up more than 15% of the premium or less than 5% of the premium will qualify.
52
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Risk Distribution
─ Rev. Rul. 2002-90 indicates 12 insureds are enough. ─ Rev Rul. 2005-40 was issued as guidance for Risk Distribution:
1 insured is not enough.
─ Risk Distribution= Law of Large numbers: No 1 insured will pay for their own losses. 2 insureds may be enough (My personal interpretation). 90% of premium from one insured is not enough. SMLLC’s are parent risk.
─ FSA 200202002 states 1 insured which makes up between 86% to 88% of the premium is not enough risk distribution.
─ Homogeneous.
53
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
50% or More
─ If at least 50% of your business is issuing insurance contracts you will qualify for insurance company status.
• Investment income cannot outweigh underwriting income:
Watch for SMLLC’s owned by the captive.
─ If circumstances are right, an argument can be made that investment income which outweighs underwriting income can qualify as insurance.
54
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Other Considerations
─ Capitalization
─ Business Purpose
─ Indemnifications & Guarantees
─ Commonly Accepted as Insurance
55
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
What Constitutes Insurance?
─ If you have risk shifting & risk distribution you should have an insurance contract for IRS purposes.
─ If at least 50% of your business is issuing insurance contracts you will qualify for insurance company status.
56
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Not Qualifying?
─ Reasons for not wanting to be taxed as an insurance company:
• Tax Exempt Members
• REIT members
• Short tail property (not a big deal)
• Fully Reinsured
57
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Ways to Achieve Risk Distribution
58
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Ways to Achieve Risk Distribution
─ Brother-Sister organizational structure
─ Third Party
• Customer Risk
• Pooling Arrangements
• Employee Benefits
59
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
RED INSURANCE LTD.
$49X of risk from Red Co.
YELLOW INSURANCE LTD.
$42.5X of risk from Yellow Co.
BLUE INSURANCE LTD.
$30X of risk from Blue Co.
RED INSURANCE LTD.
49% of pooled risk
YELLOW INSURANCE LTD.
42.5% of pooled risk
RED INSURANCE LTD.
30% of pooled risk
Pooling
$49x Red Co Risk $42.5x Yellow Co.
Risk $30x Blue Co. Risk
Pooling of Risks
60
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Pooling of Risks Chief Counsel Advice 200844011
─ Members cede into the pool and reinsure the pool • Provided for the conduct of pool business
• Pool spread risk of loss among members
─ Found the pool to be an insurance company for tax purposes • The Pool operates separately from each member
• Members of the Pool exercised mutual control over the operations and management of the Pool through Participants’ committee
• Various committees oversaw pool operations No single pool member could prevent the pool from acting on its determinations
• Maintained separate account books Reinsurance premium was actuarially determined
─ Excise taxes were found to be applicable
61
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Pooling of Risks Private Letter Ruling 200907006 ─ A foreign company providing business insurance coverage
and participating in a reinsurance pool will be treated as an insurance company for tax purposes
─ IRS concluded – provided the company is adequately capitalized, the arrangement between the company and its insureds constitutes insurance • Company is in the business of issuing insurance and reinsurance
contracts.
Open Question
Does the Risk have to be homogeneous?
62
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Pooling of Risks Risk Mixers
PLR 201030014 (7/30/10) – Risk Mixers
─ Involved a sole proprietor that insured with a captive owned by a trust for the proprietor and his spouse
─ The captive reinsured its risks with a Pooling Company (risk mixer entity) which pooled numerous risks and reinsured a proportionate part of several pools (a pool for each coverage)
─ No captive in the pool insured more than 15% of the pool’s total risks
─ Same result in PLR 200907006 (2/13/09)
63
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Employee Benefits
─ Revenue Ruling 80-95 (Excise Taxes)
─ Facts: • An employee benefits contract with a domestic corporation.
• A foreign insurer covers the domestic corporation’s contract for all payments in exchange for an annual payment.
─ Outcome: • Employee benefits contracts act like 3rd party contracts and are
considered insurance for tax purposes.
64
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Questions
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
831(b) Captives
66
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
831(b) Captives
67
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies
Small Corporations can “elect” to be taxed on their taxable investment income.
Must meet the tax qualifications to be taxed as an insurance company in order to make the election.
68
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies (Cont’d)
What is Small?
Section 831(b)(2)(A)(i) states that the net written premiums (or, if greater, direct written premiums) for the taxable year do not exceed $1,200,000
Company must elect and can only be revoked by the Commissioner or if the Company fails to meet the criteria
69
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
– Net written premiums and direct written premiums are not defined by the Internal Revenue Code or regulations. However, the IRS Manual has determined that the IRS will look to the NAIC definition of these terms.
• Direct written premiums = all premiums arising from policies
issued by the company as the primary insurance carrier, adjusted for any return or additional premiums arising from endorsements, audits, and retrospective rating plans.
• Net written premiums = the sum of direct written premiums plus assumed reinsurance premiums, less ceded reinsurance premiums.
70
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Investment expenses also can include general expenses properly allocable to investment activities.
─ Section 1.822-8(c)(2) (ii) defines “general expenses” to mean “any expense paid or incurred for the benefit of more than one department of the company rather than for the benefit of a particular department thereof.”
• Auditing Expenses
• Management Fees
• Tax Fees
• Etc.
─ See Letter Ruling 9609003
71
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Controlled Group:
─ If there is more than 1 insurance company that is part of a consolidated return or member of a controlled group, the premiums of all insurance companies must be aggregated in order to determine if the $1.2 million threshold has been exceeded.
See Section 831(b)(2)(B)
72
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
─ Net Operating Losses:
─ Can not be carried to or from a year in which the company is taxed under Section 831(b)
─ Can not be carried to any taxable year if, between the taxable year from which such loss is being carried and such taxable year, there is an intervening taxable year for which the insurance company was not subject to the tax imposed by subsection (a)
73
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies (Cont’d)
Captive Academy of the 14th Annual Executive Educational Conference
Frequently asked Questions:
─ One the election is made, can I decide not to make the election due to losses?
─ Can you flip/flop between 831(b) years and traditional years?
─ Are the 831(b) captives more vulnerable to IRS scrutiny?
─ Will congress increase the premium threshold anytime soon?
Alternative Tax for Small Insurance Companies (Cont’d)
74