The Global Aviation Safety Roadmap and the Global Aviation ... proposal [KLO] Dec… · The...
Transcript of The Global Aviation Safety Roadmap and the Global Aviation ... proposal [KLO] Dec… · The...
The Global Aviation Safety Roadmap and the Global Aviation
Safety Plan
The Regional Perspective
• In the 21st century a safe flight should be a basic right of citizens everywhere
• Accident rates are unacceptable, but historical
• We have the ability to change this
• Rapid positive change depends on:
• Industry and government working together
• Focusing joint energy on the most significant problems.
• Workshops help participants focus on the “right things to do” and determine what to do about them.
Middle East: Abu Dhabi, 21-22 January, 2008
• Attendees:
• Approximate 200 attendees from regulatory, airline, airport, ATM and other authorities and organizations from UAE, Sudan, Qatar, Egypt, Libya, Palestine, Oman, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia
• ISSG (Airbus, Boeing, FSF, IATA, IFALPA) and ICAO
• Observers from outside the Middle East, including representatives from the United Nations, South Africa, and the Russian Federation
• Addressed 7 GASR Focus Areas
• Outcome:
• Abu Dhabi Resolution signed by the UAE, Iraq, Sudan, AACO, ICAO, and IFALPA
• Accept the ICAO GASP and the GASR as the basis for regional safety plans
• Establishment of a Middle East Safety Team (MEST)
• Commit to implementing the safety priorities identified by the MEST
• Next Steps:
• COSCAP and MEST unify plans
COSCAP-BAG: Abuja, 14-16 April, 2008
• Approximate 250 Attendees from Cape Verde, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Nigeria, Banjul Accord Group COSCAP, Virgin Nigeria, Arik Air, Aero Contractors, Bristow Helicopters, Airports, Air Service Providers
• ICAO: Air Navigation Bureau personnel, AFI Regional Officers, AFI Plan Director
• ISSG: Boeing, FSF, IATA
• Addressed 4 GASR Focus Areas
• Outcome:
• Following the GASR process, the teams developed prioritized recommended actions to address the 4 focus areas
• Released a Communiqué known as “Abuja Declaration” in line with AFI Aviation Safety implementation plan for Banjul Accord Group States
• COSCAP BAG convened extraordinary meeting after workshop to consider implementation of recommended actions
• COSCAP BAG Steering Committee adopted the Abuja Declaration on 17th April 2008 and established Terms of Reference
• Next Steps:
• Additional Gap Analysis of the COSCAP States conducted by ICAO-AFI initiative
• Workshop planned to work on focus areas for Nigeria – Dec 2008
East Africa: Arusha, Tanzania, August 12-14, 2008
• Attendees: Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Ethiopia, South Africa, Nigeria, CASSOA, Zanzibar Department of Aviation, Seychelles, United States DOT, EASA, SADC COSCAP, Precision Air, Ethiopian Airlines, Air Tanzania, MAF, Equity Aviation, Regional Aviation College (Tanzania), Astral Aviation, IFATCA, Das Handling (Uganda)
• ICAO Nairobi Director, Assistant Director, and TCB Officer, ICAO Montreal, ICAO AFI Plan Director
• ISSG: IFALPA, Boeing
• Addressed 4 GASR focus areas
• Outcome:
• Recommendations for all 4 focus areas
• Arusha Communiqué on Aviation Safety issued by the closing plenary
• Declares objectives of workshop accomplished, accepts recommendations
• Next Steps:
• CASSOA and ICAO AFI Plan personnel to refine gap analysis for East African Community States
• Define next workshop date and schedule to work on the remaining GASR focus areas
• Monitor the implementation of Recommendations
Pan America: Bogotá, 19-23 May, 2008
• Attendees: Argentina, Bahamas, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, Ecuador, Haiti, Netherlands Antilles, Panama, Paraguay, Perú, Dominican Republic, Trinidad & Tobago, United States, Uruguay, COCESNA/ACSA, ALTA, LAN Argentina, LAN Chile, TACA, Avianca, TAM, Aero República, COPA, UPS
• ICAO Lima and Mexico Directors, ICAO Montreal
• ISSG: Boeing, IATA, IFALPA, ACI
• Addressed 3 GASR Focus Areas
• Outcome:
• Formed Regional Aviation Safety Group – Pan America (RASG-PA), Created Terms of Reference
• RASG-PA includes all States from NACC and SAM regions, Industry, International and Regional Organizations
• Largest GASR implementation effort worldwide
• Next Steps:
• Regional Aviation Safety Group Pan America (RASG-PA) – Organization meeting, August 2008, Mexico City
• Approved TORs, Created 3 projects to address implementation of recommendations for each focus area
• Follow up workshop: December 2008, Costa Rica
Workshop Objectives
1. Develop a thorough understanding of the Global Aviation Safety Plan and its analytic process based upon the Roadmap
2. Understand how to use the process to support development of safety action plans for your region
3. Help the ISSG and ICAO understand how the GASR/GASP can be improved
COSCAP’s in Asia and Global Aviation Safety Roadmap
CAST and GASR
CAST supports the Global Aviation Safety Roadmap (GASR) as an international strategic plan to promote aviation safety programs, which is complementary to the implementation of appropriate tactical solutions contained in the CAST Safety Plan
COSCAP History
COSCAP-South East Asia has been working on safety issues for the last seven years.
Asian Regional Aviation Safety Teams (SA-, NA-, and SEA-RAST):
–review safety recommendations,
–develop interventions,
–track implementation.
Focused primarily on improving safety by reducing accident risk.
Global Aviation Safety Roadmap (GASR)
Proactive approach to aviation safety
Help coordinate and guide safety policies
12 Focus Areas established
–4 Focused on States (government)
–1 Joint regional responsibilities
–8 Focused on industry (operators)
The Focus Areas are high level
–Accident risk reduction not defined or identified
Best Practices identified for each Focus Area
12 Global Safety Initiatives
The strategic action plan, ‘Implementation the Global Aviation Safety Roadmap’ defines:
– Focus Areas.
– Objective of each Focus Area.
– Best Practices for each Focus Area.
– Metrics for each Best Practices.
Metrics
In many instances the metrics link with:
ICAO USOAP audit results used when related to States.
IATA ISOA audit results used when related to industry.
ICAO Annexes, SARPS, Documents, etc.
Prior Roadmap Workshops have developed an implementation tool.
Example from Focus Area 1, International Standards
Best Practices, Metrics and Implementation
Table 1a –Best Practices Metrics Implementation
BP 1a-2 – States takes all necessary action to ensure
compliance with SARPs and industry best practice.
a. The State enacts enabling legislation which facilitates
the creation and modification of a regulatory scheme
giving SARPs the force of law.
b. State processes include an evaluation of their own
compliance with SARPs.
c. State implements USOAP recommendations.
d. State secures necessary financial, human and
technical resources to develop, update and implement
regulations meant to enforce SARPS and to implement
industry best practices. Resources are drawn as
necessary from national, regional and international
sources.
e. ICAO assistance activities are aligned with the
Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) and the Global
Aviation Safety Roadmap.
f. State publishes notice of non compliance to all
affected entities and notifies ICAO in accordance with
Article 38 of the Convention until such time as the
SARP is complied with.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
USOAP LEG 1.001; LEG 1.005;
LEG 1.009; ORG 2.009
USOAP OPS 4.003; 4.005;
AGA 8.003
ICAO Doc. 9735, Chapter 6
USOAP ORG 2.051; ORG 2.053
Percentage of assistance
activities that can be linked to
best practices or focus area -
Results of assistance activities
are assessed against metrics and
other available benchmarks
Difference are notified to ICAO
–Significant differences are
listed in the State’s AIP –
USOAP LEG 1.025
□ Complete
□ Somewhat
□ Little/None
□ Not Applicable
Analysis:
Example from Focus Area 9, Inconsistent Adoption of Industry Best Practices
Best Practices, Metrics and Implementation
Table 9a –Best Practices Metrics Implementation
BP 9a-1 – The organization creates and maintains an
organizational structure that facilitates adoption of
industry Best Practice within the organization.
a. The organization designates a specific
individual within the organization or within
each operating unit with responsibility for
researching and disseminating existing best
practice for that unit’s activities. That
individual is able to recommend specific points
for adoption and has follow up responsibilities
to ensure implementation of safely critical
items.
b. The organization adopts “Just Culture”
principles to ensure that implementation of best
practices are appropriate to the individual
organization. These principles encourage an
open dialog across all levels of the management
structure to optimize information flow both u
and down the chain.
c. The organization vests in line managers the
ability to take action to implement safety best
practices.
d. Best Practice is independent of any cultural
issues. Where cultural issues are presented,
steps are taken to resolve them consistent with
international best practice.
a.
b.
c.
d.
IOSA ORG 1.3.3; 1.4.2;
1.7.7; 2.2.3
IOSA ORG 1.2.3; 1.5.1;
2,1,1; 3,2,6
IOSA ORG 3.2.4; 3.1.1
IOSA ORG 1.1.1; 1.5.1
□ Complete
□ Somewhat
□ Little/None
□ Not Applicable
Analysis:
Example from Focus Area 5, Inconsistent Coordination of Regional Programs
Best Practices, Metrics and Implementation
Table 5b –Best Practices Metrics Implementation
BP 5b-1 – Regional safety groups use qualitative and
quantitative risk assessment techniques to determine
levels of risk.
a. Risk assessments and development and prioritization
of safety enhancements to address those risks
developed by national and regional groups such as
CAST, ESSI, and COSCAPs North Asia (NA), South
Asia (SA), and Southeast Asia (SEA) are shared
worldwide.
a.
Risk assessment
techniques are adopted
by regional safety groups
worldwide.
□ Complete
□ Somewhat
□ Little/None
□ Not Applicable
Analysis:
Benefits of an Evaluation
Help maintain perspective between:
–Current Safety Team activity,
–USOAP audit results and actions,
– IOSA audit results and actions, and
–GASR Focus Areas
Help to focus on priorities reducing risk
Identify and avoid duplication
–Ongoing activity and efforts
–Teams
Possible Duplication
USOAP Programme, DP3
SEARAST recommendations, actions and implementation, DP5
Safety Management Systems (SMS), DP6
Incident and Accident Investigation
Creation of an additional safety team
Discussion
Thank you!