The GETA Sandals: A Footprint Location Tracking System
description
Transcript of The GETA Sandals: A Footprint Location Tracking System
The GETA Sandals: A Footprint Location Tracking System
Kenji Okuda, Shun-yuan Yeh, Chon-in Wu, Keng-hao Chang, and Hao-hua Chu
National Taiwan University
What is GETA?
a kind of the traditional Japanese sandals
Outline
Motivation Related works Basic idea Design, implementation and evaluation
(three versions try and error)
Conclusion Current works
Motivation Infrastructure cost (barriers for the user) (deployment, calibration, maintain)
Active Badge: IR receivers Active BAT: Ultrasonic receivers + RF Cricket: Ultrasonic beacons + RF RADAR: WiFi network Smart floor: pressure sensors
Goal Infrastructure free (not succeed so far in this paper-> low infrastructure) High accuracy
Related Works
Lee et al. proposed a method by recognizing a sequence of incremental
motions. E.g. 5 steps north followed by 14 steps east.
Only can tell from place to place e.g. living room, bedroom
Point research provides a vehicle self-tracking system
Basic idea of Foot-print Approach
( 0, 0 )
( 180, 200 )
Sp
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Sp=S1+S2+S3+S4+S5
How to sum up those vectors mathematically
Coordinate system 1
Coordinate system 1’
(x1, y1)
(x2, y2)
(xc2, yc2)
(xc1, yc1)
θCoordinate system 2
Need coordinate transformation for each left foot step.
Three try-and-error versions
Design version I
Bottom view side view
Ultrasonic Transmitte
rs
Ultrasonic
Receivers
Why using two transmitters
P1 (known)
P2 (Unknown)
T1d1
d2
d3
d4
Can be rotated!!
fixed
(fixed)
Why using two transmitters
P1 (known)
P2 (determined)
T1
Can Not be rotated any
more !
T2
Problems of Design I
Poor accuracy! The interference of the signals from two
transmitters. Measures the incorrect vectors Miss-detection of the user’s steps All the calculations become failure.
Can not distinguish the user is moving forward or backward!
Design version II
Bottom view side view
Ultrasonic Transmitte
r
Ultrasonic
Receivers
Pressure sensor
Orientation Sensor
Design II Performance Evaluation
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
distance (cm)
erro
r %
0.43(steps/sec)
0.7(steps/sec)
1.3(steps/sec)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
distance(cm)
erro
r d
ista
nce
(cm
)
0.43(steps/sec)
0.7(steps/sec)
1.3(steps/sec)
Two Main Error Sources
θerrP1 P2
Real path Calculated path Error Displacement
P2
Steps
Error
Real path Calculated path Error Displacement
P1
Fig1. Ultrasonic device err Fig2. Orientation sensor err
The solution of design II
Passive RFID tag
Adds a RFID reader in the GETA and put some tags in the environment.
Real Path of the user Calculated Path of the user
Design version III Orientation
SensorRFID Reader
Pressure Sensor
Ultrasonic Receivers board (with 2 Ultrasonic receivers)
Ultrasonic transmitter
Hardware Sensors of Design III
Pressure sensors Phidgets
Ultrasonic device NAVINote (an electronic pen product) Resolution : 0.2 mm
Orientation sensor InterSense InterTrax2 Resolution : 0.02 degree
RFID Reader SkyeTek M1 Read range: ~5cm
Design III Performance Evaluation
Doesn't step over thetag
Doesn't step over thetag
020406080
100120140
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
distance (cm)
erro
r dis
tanc
e (c
m) one tag per 3 m
one tage per 5 m
The positioning error under different tag density over the walking distance.
Conclusion
A interesting self tracking method. Low infrastructure cost. The error of the orientation dominants our
system accuracy. Still have some limitations
E.g. climbing the stairs, walking crossover..
Current Works
Increase the accuracy
(reducing the orientation error) Solve the obstruction problem Going down/up stair problem Enhance the wearability (wireless)