The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and...

43
The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update Advisory Roundtable August 11, 2011 1

Transcript of The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and...

Page 1: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

The Gateway Cities AQAP –Project Update

Advisory RoundtableAugust 11, 2011

1

Page 2: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

AQAP Task Update

Technical Tasks StatusComm. Medical Needs Assessment In ProcessI-710 Near Roadway Modeling In ProcessI-710 Ultrafines In ProcessAir Quality Protocol In ProcessCompendium Update In ProcessQuantitative Air Quality Analysis In ProcessI-710 Construction Staging and Phasing Assessment

In Process

The I-710 Health Impact Assessment In Process

Health Risk Assessment In ProcessDevelop Air Quality Strategies Task starts in 2012Analysis of New Air Quality Measures Task starts in 2012

Early Action Support In ProcessDevelop AQAP Report Task start in April 2012Public Outreach In Process

2

Page 3: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

I-710 EIR/EIS and AQAP Scope of Work Relationship

I-710 EIR/EIS Gateway Cities AQAP

• Technical Studies

• Noise

• AQ/HRA

• Comm. Impact Assessment

• and many more

• Emissions Inventory

• AQ/HRA

• Develop AQ Strategies

• Compendium Update

• CMNA

• I-710 HIA

• I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing

• I-710 Near Roadway Modeling (Ultrafines)

3

Page 4: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

I 710 EIR/EIS and AQAP Scope of Work Relationship

4

I-710 EIR/EIS Gateway Cities AQAP

• Technical Studies

• Noise

• AQ/HRA

• Comm. Impact Assessment

• and many more

• Emissions Inventory

• AQ/HRA

• Develop AQ Strategies

• Compendium Update

• CMNA

• I-710 HIA

• I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing

• I-710 Near Roadway Modeling (Ultrafines)

4

Page 5: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

I 710 EIR/EIS and AQAP Scope of Work Relationship

5

I-710 EIR/EIS *Gateway Cities AQAP

• Technical Studies

• Noise

• AQ/HRA

• Comm. Impact Assessment

• and many more

• Emissions Inventory

• AQ/HRA

• Develop AQ Strategies

• Compendium Update

• CMNA

• I-710 HIA

• I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing

• I-710 Near Roadway Modeling (Ultrafines)*The AQAP tasks indicated are scheduled to be completed by

the end of November for consideration in Draft I-710 EIR/EIS5

Page 6: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Project Study Areas

I-710 Gateway Cities COG Subregion

6

Page 7: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Project Study Areas

I-710

• I-710 EIR/EIS

• Numerous Technical Studies (Noise, AQ/HRA)

• I-710 HIA• I-710 Near

Roadway Modeling (Ultrafines)

• I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing

Gateway Cities COG Subregion

• Emissions Inventory

• AQ/HRA• New AQ

Measures• Compendium

Update• Community

Medical Needs Assessment

Scheduled to be completed in time for consideration in the I-710 EIR/EIS

7

Page 8: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

AQAP Six Month Outlook

JulyCompendium Update I-710 HIA Scope

AugustDraft Community Medical Needs Assessment

Draft I-710 Near Roadway Modeling (Ultrafines)

AQ/HRA Protocol

Draft I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing Analysis

SeptemberFinal Community Medical Needs Assessment

Final I-710 Near Roadway Modeling (Ultrafines)

Final I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing Analysis

OctoberDraft I-710 HIA Report

Early Action Projects Report

November -December 2011

November

Final I-710 HIA Report

2012

New Air Quality Measures and Various AQAP Products

Note: Tasks shown in gold are scheduled to be completed in time for consideration in the I-710 EIR/EIS

8

Page 9: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

AQAP Project Overview

Two Groups of Activities:

• AQAP

• I-710 Related Studies

9

Page 10: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Data Collection

Scope of Work

Data Analysis

Report Prep

Framework Discussion

Community Medical Needs Assessment

• Data Analysis Complete• Report being developed• Discuss Findings at August

Roundtables

AQAP Task Update

10

Page 11: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Protocol Development Process

11

Characterizes Health Conditions/Treatment by reviewing data re:• Disease outcomes• Health resources available• The effectiveness of existing medical care

Uses data from:• Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH):

• Los Angeles County Health Survey (2007)• Mortality in Los Angeles County (2007)

• Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD):• Hospitalization and Emergency Department Visit Data (2009)• Shortage Designation Data (2010)

• California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) (2009)• U.S. Census Bureau

Page 12: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Geographies: Health Districts

12

Page 13: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Geographies: Service Planning Areas

13

Page 14: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Examples of Metrics

14

• Asthma Prevalence, Asthma Hospitalizations & ED Visits• Adult Diabetes Prevalence, Hospitalizations & ED Visits• Obesity and Overweight rates• Children – Do Not Meet PA Guidelines• Adults Diagnosed with Depression• Parents Could Not Afford Child Check-Up• Could Not Afford Prescription Medication• Parents - Difficulty Accessing Care Due to Transportation• Uninsured• Self Reported Fair/Poor Health• Poor Availability of Fresh Fruits & Vegetables• Health Professional Shortage Areas (Primary, Mental Health, Dental)• Medically Underserved Areas and Populations• Locations of healthcare facilities

Page 15: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

I-710 Near Roadway Modeling Assessment

• Modeling is complete• Analyzing modeled data and

comparing to monitoring (AQMD and USC) data

• Discuss Findings at August Roundtables

Data Collection

Scope of Work

Run Model

Analyze Model Output

Framework Discussion

Prepare Report

AQAP Task Update

15

Page 16: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Objectives

• Original purpose of this assessment (Jerry Wood)

• Assess ability of near roadway modeling to predict actual concentrations

• Compare modeled concentrations to measured concentrations

16

Page 17: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Objective

• Modeling was performed using AERMOD based on the methodology used in I-710 EIR/EIS • And with reduction in truck activity to account

for “Recession” effects from 2008 to 2009 levels

• Average daily traffic volume with diurnal profile • 6am-9am, 9am-3pm, 3pm-7pm, 7pm-6am

• Monitoring data was collected by AQMD in 2009 at two sites, one located 15 meters west (labeled “West”) and 80 meters east (labeled “East”) of the I-710 17

Page 18: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Methodology

Two metrics were used for this comparison:• Hourly average concentration – The hourly

measured and model-predicted concentration are being statistically compared.

• Hourly concentration gradient – The ratio of concentrations at 15 m and 80 m provides a measure of concentration gradient. The observed and model-predicted concentration gradients are being statistically compared.

18

Page 19: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Methodology

• Comparison made for three-intra day periods: Morning Peak (6 – 9 AM), Evening Peak (3 – 7 PM), and Non Peak hours.

• Separate comparison winter (Feb – March) and summer seasons (July – August)

• Statistical analysis and the distribution of modeled-to-monitored concentration ratios will be used to evaluate results• Average hourly bias, average absolute bias, average

fractional bias, correlation coefficient19

Page 20: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Data Interpretation

20

1:1 line

Observed (ppb)

Mod

eled

(pp

b)

Model is over predicting

Model is under predicting

Page 21: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Scatter plots of Modeled vs Monitored CO Concentration (ppb)

21

Modeling is showing limited ability to predict monitored observations

Page 22: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Scattered Plots of Modeled vs Monitored NOx Concentration (ppb)

22Model is generally over-predicting NOx concentrations

Page 23: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Key Findings

• Significant differences are observed between monitoring data and model predictions

• In general, AERMOD under-predicts CO and over-predicts NOx concentrations.

• Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties in model inputs (variations in traffic activity and fleet mix) less so weather

• Testing using area sources versus volume sources needs to be further evaluated.

23

Page 24: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Next Steps

• Conduct additional modeling to assess source of discrepancies

• Prepare technical memo to be presented in September

24

Page 25: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

I-710 Ultrafines• Literature review complete• Report preparation initiated• Discuss Findings at August

Roundtables

Literature Review

Task Outline

Analysis

Report Prep

Framework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

25

Page 26: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Air Quality Protocol• Final Protocol being prepared• Discuss Findings at August

Roundtables

Framework Discussion

Draft Protocol Development

Final Protocol Development

Final Protocol Prep

Framework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

26

Page 27: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Scope of Protocol

Study Area

• All Gateway Cities• Wilmington• Carson

27

Page 28: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Scope of Protocol

4 Scenarios• 2009:

• Current conditions• 2023 (construction ongoing, AQMD inventory available):

• All “booked” AQ improvement strategies• I-710 construction staging and phasing concept

• 2035 (I-710 construction completed):

• All “booked” AQ improvement strategies • Includes I-710

• 2035: • All “booked” AQ improvement strategies plus• Any Additional strategies (AQAP)

28

Page 29: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Scope of Protocol

Technical Assessments• Quantifications of emissions

• Criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs), greenhouse gases

• For both general activity and I-710 construction

• Identification of additional AQ improvement strategies

• Air dispersion modeling• Criteria Pollutants and TACs

29

Page 30: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Scope of Protocol

Technical Assessments cont.• Hotspot assessment

• Criteria Pollutants and diesel particulate matter• Specific locations and/or a representative

• Human health risk assessment• TACs and PM2.5 mortality and morbidity

30

Page 31: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Protocol Development Process

• AQ/HRA TWG – 1 May 17th

• AQ/HRA TWG – 2 June 21st

• Technical Roundtable – 1 July 13th

• Advisory Roundtable – 1 July 14th

• AQ/HRA TWG – 3 July 25th

• Technical Roundtable – 2 August 10th

• Advisory Roundtable – 2 August 11th

31

Page 32: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Key Issues and Resolution

1. Use of the AQ and HRA in decision making

• Provided to the COG membership

2. Construction staging concept / emissions analysis

• Emission analysis to be provided to I-710 EIR/EIS team for further consideration.

• AQ/HRA of Construction Concept emissions will be conducted as part of larger AQAP AQ/HRA.

3. Study Area

• Expanded study area to include Wilmington and Carson per US EPA suggestions 32

Page 33: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Key Issues and Resolution

4. Offroad and nonpoint stationary source emissions

• Spatial resolution to be refined per AQMD suggestion

5. Hotspot Analysis Methodology

• Hotspot selection criteria modified per AQMD suggestion

• Analysis refinements added per US EPA and ARB suggestions

33

Page 34: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Key Issues and Resolution

6. List of air toxics to be modeled

• Acrolein omitted per ARB suggestion (US EPA did not concur)

7. Air dispersion model options

• Simulation period expanded from 1 year to 3 years per AQMD suggestion

8. Air dispersion model

• CALPUFF selected per ARB suggestion

34

Page 35: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Key Issues and Resolution cont.

9. Exposure and health risk assessment methodology

• OEHHA approach selected per OEHHA, ARB and PoLB suggestions

• PM2.5 mortality and morbidity analysis added per OEHHA, ARB, and US EPA suggestions

10.Presentation of results

• Stratification of health risk by source category, pollutant, and demographics added per US EPA suggestions

35

Page 36: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Key Issues and Resolution cont.

Next Steps

• Utilize the protocol to develop the emissions inventory and AQ/HRA

• Results will be presented in Spring 2012

36

Page 37: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

AQAP Task Update

Compendium Update• Draft Compendium presented at

July Technical and Advisory Roundtables

• Proceeding to Environmental Committee

Review Recent Regulations

Review 2006 Compendium

Interview Ports

Prepare Draft Document

Framework Discussion

37COMPLETED

Page 38: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Quantitative Air Quality Analysis• This task will Implement the

AQ/HRA Protocol (previous slide)• Initiating Data Collection.

Collect Data

Develop Protocol

Prepare Model Inputs

Run Model

Evaluate Model Performance

Evaluate Change in AQ

Prepare Report

Framework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

38

Page 39: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Impacts from I-710 Construction Staging and Phasing• Completed Draft Modeling• Expect revised population data for

construction equipment (age, hp, qty.) from CARB in late July

• Update model• Discuss Findings at August

Roundtables

COG Staging and Phasing Plan

Develop Protocol

Prepare Emission Model

Develop Emission Inventory

Prepare Report

Framework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

39

Page 40: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

I-710 Health Impact Assessment• Conducted 3rd HIA TWG• Draft Scope Considered during

recent Technical and Advisory Roundtables (feedback by 7/27)

• Draft Scope Proceeding to Environmental Committee

• Discuss Findings at August Roundtables

Framework Discussion

Draft Scope

Data Assessment

Report Preparation

Framework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

40

Page 41: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Health Risk Assessment• Finalizing AQ/HRA Protocol• Starting Model Input Preparation

Collect Data

Develop Protocol

Prepare Model Inputs

Run Model

Evaluate Model Performance

Evaluate Change in AQ

Prepare Report

Framework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

41

Page 42: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

Early Action Items for Local Gov’t• Reviewing Early Action Items (9)

from the 2007 AQAP Development Plan Report.

• Completed evaluation of status of Early Action Items

• Initiated Research on remaining Early Action Implementation.

Consult with Local Govt’s

Review Early Action Items

Determine Support Rqmt’s

Develop Early Action PlanFramework Discussion

AQAP Task Update

42

Conduct EvaluationConsult with

Environmental Groups

Page 43: The Gateway Cities AQAP – Project Update€¦ · • In general, AERMOD under -predicts CO and over-predicts NO x concentrations. • Discrepancies are likely due to uncertainties

AQAP Project Overview Schedule

43