The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

49
The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Transcript of The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Page 1: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

The Future of Energy

Fred Loxsom

Eastern Connecticut State University

Page 2: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Atmospheric CO2 is rising.GHG concentration is rising

Page 3: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Environmental changes have been observed

Page 4: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Global Climate is Changing

Page 5: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Impacts may be severe

Page 6: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Fossil Fuels are the main cause

C + O2 CO2

Page 7: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

We have choices to make

Page 8: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

How do we reduce our carbon footprint?

Page 9: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Current Situation

85% of US primary energy is from fossil fuel

Page 10: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

US Energy and CO2

Coal Consumption & Resources

Coal : 23% energy and 38% CO2

Oil: 38% energy and 41% CO2

NG: 23% energy and 21% CO2

Page 11: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

US Energy End Use

Coal Consumption & Resources

40% energy electricity33% energy transportationRemainder heating & industry

Page 12: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Coal

Coal Consumption & Resources

About 50% of US electricity is generated by coal-burning power plants.

Page 13: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Future Coal Consumption

Because coal is cheap and plentiful, coal consumption is projected to increase rapidly.

Page 14: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Coal-Burning Power Plant

600 plants330 GW capacityBaseline power50% of US electricity typical plant500 MW capacity3.4 billion kWh annually3.4 MtCO2 annually SOx, NOx, Hg, particulatesMining and solid waste

Page 15: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Alternatives?

o Nuclearo Shale gaso Energy Efficiency and Conservationo Sequestrationo Distributed Solaro Central Solaro Windo Geothermalo Other

Page 16: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Nuclear Power after Fukushima

Page 17: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Nuclear Power

o 104 reactorso 100 GW capacityo Baseline powero 20% electricityo High capital costo Minimal CO2

Page 18: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Nuclear Power in the US

Page 19: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Nuclear Reactors:Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)

Page 20: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Indian Point

Unit 2 and Unit 3 were commissioned in 1974 and 1976.

Page 21: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Onsite Pool Storage

The spent fuel rod pool inside the Clinton Nuclear Power Plant in Clinton, Ill., is shown on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 1996. The water in the pool acts as a shield against radiation from the used uranium rods. The reactor was shut down due to an equipment malfunction Sept. 5, 1996. (AP Photo/Mark Cowan)

Page 22: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Dry Cask Storage

In this photo released by Holtec International, dry cask storage units are seen at the James A. Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant in Scriba, N.Y., in this undated photo. The Vermont Public Service Board approved "dry cask storage," of spent nuclear fuel at Vermont Yankee, lifting the threat that running out of room in its existing spent fuel storage pool would cause the plant to close by 2008.(AP Photo/Holtec International)

Page 23: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Long-Term Storage

Page 24: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Nuclear Accidents

Page 25: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Three Mile Island (1979)

Three Mile Island nuclear power plant is pictured in Jan. 21, 1996. This is the site of the 1979 partial core melt. (AP Photo/Tim Shaffer, files)

Page 26: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Chernobyl (1986)

Page 27: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Japan (2011)

Page 28: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Nuclear Future?

Page 29: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Shale Gas

Page 30: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Horizontal Drilling

Page 31: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Hydrofracturing

Page 32: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Efficiency and conservation

Page 33: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

High Performance Buildings

Page 34: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Efficient Power Plants

Page 35: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Economic Incentives

Cap and Trade

Carbon Tax

Tax Credits

Rebates

Page 36: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Carbon Sequestration

Page 37: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Rooftop PV

Page 38: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

PV: Denver Airport 4 MW

Page 39: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

CSP: Parabolic Trough

Page 42: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.
Page 43: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

GE 3.6 MW Wind Turbines

Page 44: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Wind Resources

http://attra.ncat.org/images/renewables/windResourceMap2.jpg,,Retrieved on 2/11/2009

Page 46: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Electricity Generation

Page 47: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Geothermal Energy Distribution

Page 48: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Selection Parameters

• Environmental Impact

• Cost

• Safety

• Footprint

• Reliability

• Acceptability

Page 49: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.

Summary: Future of Energy

• Must replace coal.

• Natural gas, but not as clean as it seems.

• Solar and Wind could supply 20%-50%, but better grid needed.

• Efficiency has great potential.

• Clean Coal & Geothermal -- ?

• Tar sands & other fossil fuel – high environmental price