The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1)...
Transcript of The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 - Edition 2020 · Consequences for new version of Almanac: 1)...
GE
RM
AN
FE
DE
RA
L I
NS
TIT
UT
E
FO
RR
ISK
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT
Julia Schöne and Majlinda Lahaniatis
The Food Safety Almanac 2.0 -
Edition 2020
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 2
Food Safety Almanac 2020 - Fit for purpose?
Up-to-date overview of Food Safety Structures in respective
countries
▪ Comprehensive, but simple
▪ Impactful and complete graphic presentation
▪ Reduce text
▪ Conformity of profile structures and of texts with graphics
Deliverable
▪ Food Safety Almanac in printed form
▪ Wiki‚ World Food Safety Almanac
Important!
▪ Reduce as much as possible resource investement during the
process
What‘s the purpose of this update regarding the
content of Food Safety Almanac?
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 3
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Survey on TEAMS
Organigrams
DGEFKE
Child
nutrition
Nutrition
RKI
Health
UBA
Environ-
ment
Nature
JKI MRI
NutritionAnimal Plant
BMG BMUB
BfN
Risk assessment Risk management
National level
Federal state level
FLI
Key questions prior update
▪ More details?
▪ Definition of levels?
▪ Relations between institutions?
▪ Illustration of main roles (RA, RM, RC)
AL
MA
NA
C
18,5%
33%18,5%
30%
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 4
More organizations working in
the area of food and feed safety
should be illustrated
(5 votes out of 27)
Main roles of organizations
(RA, RM, RC) should be
indicated (9 votes out of 27)
Diagrams shouldn't be
more detailed (8 votes
out of 27)
Different levels of
organizations in the diagram
need to be explained more
clearly (5 votes out of 27)
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Organigrams
Should organigrams be more detailed?
Consequences for new version of Almanac:
1) Illustration of all main actors and important
Art-36-organizations (described in country profiles)
2) Indication of main roles (RA, RM, RC)
of main actors and important
Art-36-organizations (if possible)
18,5%
33%18,5%
30%
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 5
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Organigrams
Should organigrams be more detailed?
3) Clear explanation for different levels
in organigram will be given
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 6
Icons /
Responsibilities?
1. Inclusion of institutions not
included in Art.-36-List?
1. Completeness of
Pictograms illustrating
responsibilities?
1. Fully description of
responsililities in food safety
by pictograms?
2. How much text description is
needed?
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? Responsibilities
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 7
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Responsibilities
Should an additional info box / list be added for organizations working in the area of food
and feed safety but don’t belong to Art.-36-List?24%(4)
76%(13)
Yes
No
Consequences for new version of Almanac:
1) No additional box / list will be integrated in country profiles
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 8
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Responsibilities
Are existing pictograms that illustrate responsibilities of organizations complete?
„Our proposals are related to EFSA
categories and our national control plan:
Animal health and welfare, Plant health,…
Iwould propose to have a more global term:
‚Biological Hazards‘ instead of ‚Zoonoses‘.“
„
“
“
„
Consequences for new version of Almanac:
1. 7 existing pictograms will be maintained
2. 3 of existing pictograms will be renamed
3. Creation of 5 – 8 new pictograms (in progress)
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 9
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Responsibilities
Are existing pictograms that illustrate responsibilities of organizations complete?
53%(8)
47%(7)
Yes
No
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 10
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Responsibilities
7 existing pictograms will be maintained 3 existing pictograms will be renamed
Animal Feed
Biological Hazards (and Zoonoses)
Biotechnology (and Genetic Engineering)
Are existing pictograms that illustrate responsibilities of organizations complete?
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 11
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Responsibilities
New pictograms to be created for following responsibilities are discussed :
Plant
Health
Food
Contact
Materials &
Packaging
Food
IngredientsNutrition
Animal
Health &
Welfare
Nano-
technologyEmerging
Risks
Environ-
mental
RA
In compliance with
EFSA‘s working areas
Additional proposals
by Member States
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 12
1) Main actors in Food and Feed Safety systems in respective country must be…
▪ …illustrated in organigram (blue color)
▪ …described by their main role in organigram (RA, RM, RC in brackets)
▪ …described in a separate box (blue color)
BMEL(RM, RC)
BVL(RM, RC)
BfR(RA, RC)
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles
MRIDGE
2) Art.-36-Organizations, deeply involved in RA / RM / RC processes in the country
and closely working with the main actors on a frequent basis, must be…
▪ …illustrated in organigram (blue color)
▪ …described by their main role in organigram (RA, RM, RC in brackets) whenever applicable
▪ …described in a separate box (blue color)
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 13
MRI
Max Rubner Institute
http://www.mri.de
BMEL(RM, RC)
BVL(RM, RC)
BfR(RA, RC) MRI
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles
DGE
DGE
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung
http://www.dge.de
The German Nutrition Society (DGE),
established in 1953, has since been
engaged in topics on nutrition and
nutritional research. From the onset, the
DGE has been a non-profit organization
committed to scientific facts. The DGE is
3) Any other actors…
1) …might be illustrated in organigram in light blue color (not obligatory step)
2) …might be described in a separate box (light blue color) like main actors or
Art.-36-Organizations
1) Attention! If decided to include these actors in organigram it is mandatory to briefly describe
with text in the country profile their full name and responsibilities
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 14
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles
BMEL(RM, RC)
BVL(RM, RC)
BfR(RA, RC)DGE MRI
4) All organizations must be described
by their acronym in organigram
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 15
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles
BMEL
(RM, RC)
BVL
(RM, RC)
BfR
(RA, RC)DGE MRI
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
(RM, RC)
BVL
(RM, RC)
BfR
(RA, RC)DGE MRI
5) When relationships between organizations exist,
they must be illustrated in organigram with lines
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 16
✓ Possible Reduction of texts?
(Reduce as much as possible resource
investement during the process)
✓ Full description of responsibilities
by pictograms in boxes?
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles
Last Check
✓ All organizations illustrated in organigram are
described in country profiles (see slides 12 – 14)
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 17
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose! – Rules for updating country profiles
Definitions
Box
Text
Organigram
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 18
Almanac Edition 2020. Current Status Wiki
✓ Creation of new categories in sidebar (e.g. ‘foreword’ and ‘How to read’)
✓ Determination of country administrators and individual editing rights
✓ Filling country profiles with content (including tables, tables of contents, sections and icons)
✓ Editing world map (setting pins, country outlines and links to country profiles)
In process:
I. Reinstallation of demo-version on a new server to make all functions available
II. Creation of organigrams
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 19
English country profiles in
Wiki (by BfR+MS)
01/2020
Provision of
Template and
Guideline (by BfR)
02/2020 03/2020
Compilation of
information (by
BfR)
04/2020
Second Review
by MS
05/2020
Order print version of
Almanac (by BfR)
06/2020 10/202007/2020
Translation in local language
ttrough MS administrators
(supported by BfR)
Almanac Edition 2020. Project plan 2019-2020
12/2019
Preparation of Food Safety
structures (MS profile)
GE
RM
AN
FE
DE
RA
L I
NS
TIT
UT
E
FO
RR
ISK
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT
Thank you for your attention
Julia Schöne and Majlinda Lahaniatis
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10 ⚫ 10589 Berlin, GERMANY
Phone +49 30 - 184 12 - 0 ⚫ Fax +49 30 - 184 12 – 99 0 99
[email protected] ⚫ www.bfr.bund.de/en
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 21
Food Safety Almanac Wiki 2020 – State of Play
Feasibility Study + Wiki Demoversion
by IT students of Freie Universität Berlin,
Germany
April 2019 July 20192017
Vision and Objectives
Development of Wiki
Demoversion completed
3rd updated
version
2009
1st version
2nd updated
version
2011
4th updated version
ENP-Almanac
CPLP-Almanac
2014
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 22
Main Page
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 23
More…
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 24
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
Main Page
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 25
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
World Map
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 26
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
Country Profile - Germany
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 27
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
Country Profile - Italy
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 28
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 29
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
Main Page
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 30
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view
Glossary
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 31
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – User view (Video)
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 32
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – Editor view
Creating a new country profile
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 33
Food Safety Almanac Wiki Demoversion – Editor view
Translating and Creating Organigrams
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 34
Food Safety Almanac 2020 - Fit for purpose?
Up-to-date overview of Food Safety Structures in respective
countries
▪ Comprehensive, but simple
▪ Impactful and complete graphic presentation
▪ Reduce text
▪ Conformity of profile structures and of texts with graphics
Deliverable
▪ Food Safety Almanac in printed form
▪ Wiki‚ World Food Safety Almanac
Important!
▪ Reduce as much as possible resource investement during the
process
What‘s the purpose of this update regarding the
content of Food Safety Almanac?
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 35
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? - Organigrams
DGEFKE
Child
nutrition
Nutrition
RKI
Health
UBA
Environ-
ment
Nature
JKI MRI
NutritionAnimal Plant
BMG BMUB
BfN
Risk assessment Risk management
National level
Federal state level
FLI
Key questions prior update
▪ More detailed?
▪ Definition of levels?
▪ Relations between institutions?
▪ Illustration of main roles (RA, RM, RC)
AL
MA
NA
C
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 36
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? - Organigrams
Key questions prior update
▪ Conformity with text
desciption in boxes?
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 37
Icons /
Responsibilities?
1. Inclusion of institutions not
included in Art.-36-List?
1. Completeness of
Pictograms illustrating
responsibilities?
1. Fully description of
responsililities in food safety
by pictograms?
2. How much text description is
needed?
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? Responsibilities
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 38
Project plan 2019-2020
English country profiles in
Wiki (by BfR+MS)
09/2019
Preparation of Food Safety
structures (MS profile)
11/2019 12/2019
Compilation of
information (by
BfR)
01/2020
Second Review
by MS
02/2020
Order print version of
Almanac (by BfR)
03/2020 10/202004/2020
Translation in local language
ttrough MS administrators
(supported by BfR)
Template of country
profile Germany for
orientation?
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 39
Dr Nicole Gollnick
Dr Torsten Herold
Thanks to…
GE
RM
AN
FE
DE
RA
L I
NS
TIT
UT
E
FO
RR
ISK
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT
Thank you for your attention
Julia Schoene
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10 ⚫ 10589 Berlin, GERMANY
Phone +49 30 - 184 12 - 0 ⚫ Fax +49 30 - 184 12 – 99 0 99
[email protected] ⚫ www.bfr.bund.de/en
J. Schöne & M. Lahaniatis, 15.11.2019, 41st EFSA Focal Point meeting page 41
Almanac Edition 2020. Fit for purpose? – Results of survey on TEAMS
Check-Box
Conformity between illustration (organigrams)
and description of organizations (boxes / texts)When relationships exist: Illustration of
relations Between organizations in organigrams
UBA?MRI
(Art. 36)
MRI
Max Rubner Institute