The Five Flavors of Project Management Leadership
-
Upload
zongali-kumar -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of The Five Flavors of Project Management Leadership
-
8/10/2019 The Five Flavors of Project Management Leadership
1/2
CO C O
JUST AS THERE are five primary
flavors we can taste that com-
bine to create literally millions
of potential food flavors, five essentialproject management styles define our
own leadership style.
We are products of our genetic her-
itages as well as our experiences. No
human being is as simple or as com-
plex as psychologists, politicians, soci-
ologists or evolutionary biologists try
to make us out to be.
We all embrace one of the five fol-
lowing primary leadership styles and
simultaneously have traces of the
other four that come to the fore
when our primary leadership game
plan isnt working.
By recognizing these paradigms ofhow we manage projects and lead team
members, we can enhance our
strengths and minimize our weak-
nesses. We also can recognize these
traits in others and use that knowledge
to our advantage as well.
The deve lopmental l ead er. This
leader uses formal and informal learn-
ing as a tool to maximize potential, in
both himself and his charges.
Strengths: By emphasizing continual
reinvention of himself through never-
ending education, he keeps fresh eyes
on the target of profitability and is
aware of all the latest methods of howto achieve it . Constant review of
marketplace conditions means that
new so-called niche opportunities
will become available to your com-
pany before most of your competitors
are aware of them.
Weaknesses: He can often become
lost in the pursuit of knowledge for
knowledges sake without regard to
day-to-day reality. The never-ending
quest for knowledge can detract from
the daily tasks at hand at the expense
of job profitability.
The character -based leader . This
leader uses longstanding personalhabits, principles and behaviors to get
things done.
Strengths: As long as these traits are
positive ones such as honesty, atten-
tion to detail and punctuality, consis-
tently profitable job performance can
be expected. When the chips are down
or he is assigned a job that otherwise is
headed toward disaster, these positive
personal character traits can be inspira-
tional to those around him and
enhance the chances for potentially
pulling a bad job out of the ditch.
Weaknesses: A character-based leader
sometimes has an overblown sense of
self-importance and a stubborn streak
that tells those around him that he
thinks hes always right, even when
reality indicates otherwise. When
these types possess any character flaw,
they are usually reluctant to try tochange for the better, even when its
clearly called for.
Th e s it ua ti on al le ad er . He uses
maturity and the recognized capabili-
ties of fellow project stakeholders to get
the project accomplished.
Strengths: He usually takes simultane-
ous macro (the forest) and micro (a sin-
gle tree) views to analyze the totality of
the project and choose the best course
of action. Modest to complete lack of
ego allows him to let fellow team mem-
bers become more fully integrated
within the projects scope, allowing all
involved to do their jobs better by play-ing on their own strengths.
Weaknesses: He lacks attention to de-
tail at times or lacks focus at times on
necessary day-to-day goals and project
milestones. Theres sometimes a mild
streak of laziness because hes empow-
ered others to do much of the actual
work that another leadership style
would have taken over. Delegation and
assignment of authority on the project
also can lead to wanting to be liked too
much by fellow team members and can
result in avoiding conflict or discipline
thats often necessary to control a job.
The functional (expert) leader. He
uses personal knowledge, experience
and personality to get things done.
Strengths: He has hard-won insights
and insider knowledge of ways to ac-
complish tasks on time and on budget
that others might think impossible. Heusually remains calm and focused in
the most dire of project management
situations, because hes seen worse and
not only survived but thrived.
Weaknesses: Ego and inflated self-im-
portance to the point of hubris can be
downright objectionable to other
stakeholders. This often will negate
what other positives he might bring to
the table because nobody wants to
work with him. Stubbornness and sub-
sequent outright refusal to follow
company policies and procedures can
manifest itself in increased liability
exposures for the company.The responsive leader. He uses his
wits to survive and respond to project
problems and to develop solutions.
Strengths: An uncanny sense of self-
preservation usually drives a similarly
uncanny ability to take any job in any
state of disarray and close it out prof-
itably. Fellow stakeholders often
respond positively to his understated
sense of quiet self-confidence and
leadership by positive action more
than mere words or orders.
Weaknesses: Frequently distrustful of
other stakeholders with whom he
doesnt have a track record from pastjobs. That can lead to eventual mistrust
from those stakeholders not included
in the clique. Tendencies to take
shortcuts and bend the rules in order to
show job progress which makes for
messes that will be discovered later
that somebody else will have to clean
up after the project is completed.
In the end, it really doesnt matter
what style of leadership you possess or
that possesses you. You have to recog-
nize that you operate day-to-day with
one primary style and bits of the other
four in varying degrees. So, when
youre getting ready to do somethingbrilliant or, conversely, equally stupid,
youll know it and can act on it (or
not), as the case may call for.
H. Kent Cra ig i s a second-genera tion
mechanical contractor and project
manager with unlimited Masters licenses
in boilers, air conditioning, heating
and plumbing. He can be reached by
calling 919/367-7488, or via e-mail at
[email protected]. His Website is
www.hkentcraig.com.
The five flavors of project management leadership
CRAIG ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT BY H. KENT CRAIGMECHANICAL CONTRACTOR
The responsive leaderuseshis wits to respond to project
problems.
FORT WAYNE, IND. The Mechani-
cal Service Contractors of America has
named Current Mechanical an MSCA
STAR Contractor.
Contractors that achieve MSCA
STAR Qualified status belong to an elite
group of contractors within the heat-
ing and air conditioning industry,
MSCA said. These firms have verified
that they uphold a strict code of busi-
ness ethics, employ the best-trained
and most qualified workforce, main-
tain a safety record above the industry
average, offer outstanding customer
service, and focus on continuing edu-
cation and training for all employees.
Current Mechanical pursued this
designation as a means of providing
our existing and future customers with
industry validation that we are provid-
ing the highest level of skill, quality
and value in our market, General
Manager Pete Smith noted. Our mis-
sion statement, Delivering value
through quality and performance, has
been this companys guiding tenet
since our inception in 1978. Achieving
this designation is an honor and a
credit to the professionalism and
dedication of every member of the
Current Mechanical team.
Current is a member of the Linc
Service Network. By earning the STAR
designation, it joins a select group of
other mechanical service contractors,
several of them Linc Service Contrac-
tors, who have earned this designa-
tion, LINC said.
Were proud to see members of our
network achieve this success, as it rein-
forces our standards of excellence and
raises the bar for the more than 130
franchise locations that comprise our
organization, Linc Network President
and CEO Scott Giacobbe said. I com-
mend the staff at Current Mechanical
for their commitment to excellence.
Established in 1978, Current Me-
chanical is led by CEO and founder
Robert Current. The company, which
joined the Linc Service Network in
2004, offers commercial and industrial
HVAC, fabrication, industrial piping,
service and maintenance and tempera-
ture controls to customers in Fort
Wayne and surrounding communities
in Ohio and Michigan. More informa-
tion is online at www.currenthvac.com.
Linc Network, headquartered in
Pittsburgh and Atlanta, is the fran-
chisor of the Linc System, a business
format for operating a commercial
HVAC service business. Founded in
1979, the Linc Service Network pro-
vides energy solutions to commercial
building owners worldwide.
More information is available at
www.lincservice.com.
Current Mechanical earns its MSCA Star
-
8/10/2019 The Five Flavors of Project Management Leadership
2/2