THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

22
THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012

Transcript of THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Page 1: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE

S.Ramghulamle Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012

Page 2: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

‘ As nature abhors a vacuum, so does the thoracic surgeon abhor a residual space after resecting

lung tissue’

Arthur W Silver. The fate of the post-resection space. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1966

Page 3: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

POINTS TO UNRAVEL

What operative factors result in a space?

With what concerns should these spaces be viewed?

Hazards to the patient?

How vigorous should one be?

Page 4: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Terminology

Benignclosed benign space

with alveolar seepagewith bronchopleural fistula

Malignantlarger / increasing size

contain fluid symptomatic

Page 5: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Institutional Review

All lung resections done at one of our operative centres, IALCH between March 2010 – February 2012

Exclusion criteriapneumonectomy

lung biopsy

Page 6: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographs

Space considered significant ifpresent > 7 days

size arbitary

Indications for surgery

Space complications and intervention

Page 7: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Data analysis

158 lung resections on 157 patients

90 – inflammatory, majority sequelar / active TB

49 – malignant18 – miscellaneous

PAVM, hydatid, foregut duplication,foreign body bronchiectasis

69 pneumonectomy (excluded from analysis)89 lobectomy

Page 8: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Results

Significant space 14/89 (15.7%)Infected 4/14 (28 %) *

Infected spaces2 emergency for massive haemoptysis1 elective for recurrent minor haemoptysis1 post middle lobectomy for foregut duplication

cyst *

Page 9: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Results

Pathology

Extent of resection

Page 10: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Pathology

PATHOLOGY N = 89

POST

OPERATIVE SPACES

FLUID COLLECTION

Inflammatory

( sequelar / active TB )

54 ( 61 % ) 12 3 empyema

Neoplastic 26 ( 29 % ) 1 Serous effusion

Misc. 9 ( 10 % ) 1 1 empyema

Page 11: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

EXTENT OF RESECTION

right upper 22

middle 4

lower 11

bi-lobe 7

left upper 25

lower 18

Total 87

Page 12: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Results

Lobectomy 80/89 (90 %)space problems 12/80 (15 %)

Bi-lobectomy 7/89 (7.9 %)space problems 2/7

(28.5%)

Segmentectomy 2/89 (2.2%)no space complications

Page 13: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Results

Spontaneous resolution 9/14 (65%)

Intervention 5/14 (35%)4 tube drainage

1 re-operation

Page 14: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Active TB with massive haemoptysisRight upper lobectomyConservative treatment

Page 15: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Active TB with massive haemoptysisRight upper and middle lobectomyTreated with tube drainage

Page 16: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

6 week follow up

Page 17: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Follow up

Space persisting > 7 days regarded as significant

10/14 persistent spaces

8/10 complete resolution by 2/521/10 complete resolution by 3/521/10 defaulted follow up

Page 18: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Discussion

Empyema2 LUL

UL and ML- emergency for massive haemoptysis

1 RUL- elective minor haemoptysis – Bioglue!

1 ML - foregut duplication cyst

3/4 pathology – TB3/4 resolved1/4 required completion pneumonectomy

Page 19: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Discussion

Factorspathology

shrunken vs. non-shrunkeninflammatory

techniquefissures

air-leaks

parenchymal

bronchiolar

BPF

Page 20: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Intervention

Infection

BPF

Increase (relative)

Discussion

Page 21: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

Discussion

Intervention

Methodsaspiration

tube drainagethoracoplastyre-operation

Page 22: THE FATE OF THE POSTRESECTION SPACE S.Ramghulam le Roux Institute of Thoracic Surgery 2012.

“The benign nature of post-operative pleural spaces is thus apparent, and it is strongly urged that aggressive treatment of these spaces be withheld unless some urgent indication, such as infection, occurs.”

Conclusion

Arthur W Silver. The fate of the post-resection space. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1966