THE EFFECTVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT...
Transcript of THE EFFECTVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT...
THE EFFECTVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT
SCHOOL BOARD’S TEACHER PROFESSIONAL
LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Organizational Development/Research & Information Services Toronto District School Board
12/13-11
R10(PL_TakingItGlobal\EffectivenessOfTDSBTeacherPL2012-13BlendedPLC)sz.3457
The Effectiveness of the Toronto District School Board’s Teacher Professional Learning in the 2012-2013 Blended Professional Learning Community
Copyright © (July 2013) Toronto District School Board
Reproduction of this document for use in the schools of the Toronto District School Board is encouraged.
For any other purpose, permission must be requested and obtained in writing from: Organizational Development/Research & Information Services Toronto District School Board 1 Civic Centre Court, Lower Level Etobicoke, ON M9C 2B3
Tel.: 416-394-4929 Fax: 416-394-4946 Every reasonable precaution has been taken to trace the owners of copyrighted material and to make due acknowledgement. Any omission will gladly be rectified in future printings.
R10(PL_TakingItGlobal\EffectivenessOfTDSBTeacherPL2012-13BlendedPLC)sz.3457
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. Pg. 3 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ Pg. 4 LITERATURE REVIEW ON EFFECTIVE TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING ........ Pg. 5 TDSB’S FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING .......................................................................................... Pg. 7 RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND METHODOLOGY........................................................... Pg. 10 DEMOGRAPHICS AND ACHIEVEMENT OF PARTICIAPTING SCHOOLS ..................... Pg. 12 BACKGROUND OF PARTICIPANTS ............................................................................... Pg. 14 Participants by Focus Area of Inquiry .................................................................... Pg. 14 Gender .................................................................................................................. Pg. 14 Role with the Board ............................................................................................... Pg. 15 Teaching Experience ............................................................................................. Pg. 15 Teaching Qualifications ......................................................................................... Pg. 16 TEACHER PERCEPTIONS ON THE BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING .............. Pg. 16 New Knowledge and Skills ..................................................................................... Pg. 16 Teaching Practice .................................................................................................. Pg. 19 Attitudes and Beliefs .............................................................................................. Pg. 22 Organizational Supporting Structures .................................................................... Pg. 23 Overall Experience ................................................................................................ Pg. 24 General Comments about the Professional Learning ............................................. Pg. 26 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................ Pg. 29 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. Pg. 33
R10(PL_TakingItGlobal\EffectivenessOfTDSBTeacherPL2012-13BlendedPLC)sz.3457
TABLES Table 1: Demographics of Participating WR3 Schools ........................................... Pg. 12 Table 2: Number of Participants by Focus Areas of Inquiry .................................... Pg. 14 Table 3: Teaching Qualifications of Participants .................................................... Pg. 16 FIGURES Figure 1: The Ontario Ministry of Education’s Effective Professional Learning ....... Pg. 6 Figure 2: Desimone’s Core Conceptual Framework for Studying the Effects for Studying the Effects of Professional Development on Teachers and Students .......................................................................... Pg. 7 Figure 3: Logic Model for Evaluating Professional Learning in the TDSB ............... Pg. 9 Figure 4: Percentage of All Grade 3 Students at Levels 3 & 4 on EQAO Assessments ........................................................................................... Pg. 13 Figure 5: Percentage of All Grade 6 Students at Levels 3 & 4 on EQAO Assessments ........................................................................................... Pg. 13 Figure 6: Percentage of Grade 9-10 Students Meeting Expectations on EQAO Assessments ............................................................................... Pg. 13 Figure 7: Percentage of Grade 9-10 Students Meeting Expectations in Credit Accumulation ............................................................................... Pg. 13 Figure 8: Participants’ Roles with the Board........................................................... Pg. 15 Figure 9: Participants’ Teaching Experience .......................................................... Pg. 15 Figure 10: Generic Knowledge/Skills for Classroom Teaching: Percentage of Participants’ with “Expert” or “Competent” Response ....................... Pg. 17 Figure 11: Generic Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: Percentage of Participants’ with “Expert” or “Competent” Response .... Pg. 17 Figure 12: Specific Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: Percentage of Participants’ with “Expert” or “Competent” Response .... Pg. 18 Figure 13: Generic Practice for Classroom Teachers: Percentage of Participants with “Proficient” or “Routine” Response ................................................ Pg. 20 Figure 14: Specific Practice for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: Percentage of Participants with “Proficient” or “Routine” Response ...... Pg. 21
R10(PL_TakingItGlobal\EffectivenessOfTDSBTeacherPL2012-13BlendedPLC)sz.3457
Figure 15: Attitudes/Beliefs about Generic Classroom Teaching and Student Learning: Percentage of Participants with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response ................................................................................. Pg. 22 Figure 16: Attitudes/Beliefs about Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: Percentage of Participants with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response ................................................................................. Pg. 22 Figure 17: Attitudes/Beliefs in the Three Specific Focus Areas of Inquiry: Percentage with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response ........................ Pg. 23 Figure 18: Organizational Supporting Structures: Percentage of Participants with “Great Extent” or “Moderate Extent” Response .................................... Pg. 23 Figure 19: Overall Experience: Percentage of Participants with “Strongly Agreed” or “Agree” Response ............................................................................ Pg. 25 Figure 20: Overall Summary of the TDSB 2012-13 Blended Professional Learning: Percentage of Participants Meeting Expectations ................. Pg. 30 APPENDICES Appendix A: Professional Learning with E-Technologies 2012-13: Teacher Questionnaire ..................................................................................... Pg. 35 Appendix B: Professional Learning with E-Technologies 2012-13: Teacher Questionnaire ..................................................................................... Pg. 39
This publication contains pages that have been left intentionally blank for proper pagination when printing.
1 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The funding for this 21st Century Pilot for System Learning initiative was provided by the
Curriculum and Assessment Policy Branch, Ministry of Education and the Council of Directors of
Education.
Special thanks to Samuel Zheng, Research Coordinator for this project and author of this report.
This research would have been impossible without the following dedicated people:
TDSB Steering Committee
Gen Ling Chang, Associate Director (A)
Jeff Hainbuch, Superintendent of Education Family of Schools WR3
Peter Paputsis, Principal Northview Heights SS
Diane Bailey, Principal Wilmington
Richard Stein, Principal Flemington
Roula Anastasakos, Executive Superintendent, Organization Development/Research & Information Services
Samuel Zheng, Research Coordinator
Frank Liu, Central Coordinating Principal Teaching & Learning
Marguerite Campbell, Central Coordinating Principal Teaching & Learning
John Tancredi, Central Coordinating Principal Teaching & Learning
Mary Jane McNamara, Central Coordinating Principal Teaching & Learning – Secondary
Tracy Hayhurst, Central Coordinating Principal Teaching & Learning – Elementary
Kien Luu, Central Coordinating Vice-Principal Student Success/Learning to 18
Diane Sharpe, Central Coordinating Vice-Principal Student Success/Learning to 18
Stephan Bibla, Program Coordinator Science & Technology
Vanessa Barnett, Program Coordinator The Arts
Nancy Britton, Program Coordinator Experiential Learning
Rob Mewhinney, Program Coordinator Social & World Studies & Humanities
Alix Harte, Program Coordinator English & Literacy
Ruth Hall, Program Coordinator Library & Learning Resources & Interdisciplinary Studies
Peter Singh, Chief Technology Officer
Kevin Bradbeer, Program Coordinator Teaching & Learning with Technology
2 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Partnership with TakingitGlobal
Michael Furdyk, TakingItGlobal (Founder)
Kate Gatto, TakingIt Global
Sara Hassan, Taking It Global
We would like to express our sincere thanks to our colleagues in the Research and Information
Services department for their professional support in this research project:
Sally Erling, Research Coordinator, for co-developing the TDSB’s Evaluation Framework
for Teacher Professional Learning;
Gerty Chiau, Research and Information Analyst, for cleaning, processing, and reporting
all the survey data;
Karen Kozovski, Research and Information Analyst, for preparing the scannable survey
forms;
Matthew Botts, Research/Data Technician, for scanning the surveys and verifying the
survey data; and
Tammy Denike, Office Manager, for editing and formatting this report.
Finally, we would like to thank all the teachers and students who participated in this research
project and the principals for their support.
3 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Guided by the Toronto District School Board’s (TDSB) generic framework for evaluating the
effectiveness of teacher professional learning, this research study examined the 2012-13
blended professional learning with technologies, and attempted to assess the impact of this
professional learning on the 107 participating teachers and administrators from 18 TDSB
schools and the Board’s Teaching and Learning department. The study employed pre and post
teacher questionnaires to evaluate the effectiveness of the professional learning in the areas of
teacher knowledge/skills, teaching practice, attitudes/beliefs, as well as organizational
supporting structures.
The study found that the vast majority of participants had “expert” or “competent” levels for
generic knowledge and skills for generic classroom teaching but not for inquiry-based teaching
and learning before the initiative. After the professional learning, the proportion of participants
considered themselves as having “expert” or “competent” knowledge/skills for inquiry-based
teaching and learning increased significantly. Teachers and administrators who did not
participate in one particular focus area of inquiry also showed moderate gains in their
knowledge/skills in the subject area which they did not participate, possibly due to the
collaboration and sharing among participants and the presence of online learning environment.
After the professional learning, participants improved the level of proficiency in their teaching
practice for generic classroom teaching and significantly for inquiry-based classroom teaching
and student learning. They had very positive attitudes and beliefs about classroom teaching and
student learning, and their attitudes and beliefs did not change much after the professional
learning as they are already very positive.
Overall, the majority of participants were satisfied with the level of support they received from
their schools or from the TDSB. When comparing their perceptions before and after the
professional learning, the most positive change occurred at teacher collaboration within the
same school and with their colleagues from other schools.
Overall, the majority of participants felt this professional learning activity was a successful
learning experience. They also intended to transfer and apply newly acquired knowledge and
skills to daily practice in the classroom to improve the impact on students.
4 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
BACKGROUND
Funded by the Ontario Ministry of Education, the Toronto District School Board’s Developing a
Model of e-Learning and Innovative Pedagogy: Teachers as Designers of Problem–based
Learning with Technology initiative is a professional learning initiative for teachers and school
administrators from 13 elementary and 5 secondary schools in the Board’s West Region 3
(WR3) Family of Schools, and instructional leaders from the Board’s Teaching and Learning
Department. The scope of the project is three fold:
To develop a blended learning environment that consists of synchronous, asynchronous,
and job-embedded learning as the architecture within which educators from three levels
of the system – classroom, school, and district learn together as professional learning
communities engaged in one of three areas of inquiry;
To gain pedagogical understanding of how technology changes teaching practice when
educators use technology as tools to connect students’ inside and outside school
learning as part of challenging and compelling problem-based learning; and
To understand how technology can be strategically used as a key lever in scaling
improvement by intentionally piloting this project with elementary and secondary school
educators in collaboration with internal and external partners. Of note is the question
whether there are differences between elementary and secondary school practices when
connecting technology to instructional strategies and pedagogy.
The initiative was grounded in the belief that learning is the work. What was unique and
innovative about this project is while educators were engaged as a professional learning
community in designing rich problem-based learning for students using technology as the key to
increasing student engagement, they were also at the same time learning to use technology as
tools for learning, thinking, and working among themselves.
In addition to a blended professional learning environment, participating educators chose one of
three areas of inquiry that current thinking in education and pedagogy considers as essential for
learning and teaching in a global context. Through the TDSB’s partnership with an external
partner, TakingITGlobal, who provided instructors online learning platforms, and virtual
classrooms for participants, the three areas of inquiry in this initiative were:
5 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Global Education: The goal is to develop understanding of and competencies in technology-
enabled global education. The participants will explore why global education is so vital currently,
and how to develop authentic and transformative global experiences for students.
Environmental Stewardship: This area of study provides educators with ideas and concepts
for bringing principles of environmental literacy into the classroom. Using online and offline
resources and tools, topics include the critical need for meaningful environmental education,
and how to foster a sense of environmental stewardship for students through a project-based,
practical approach.
Student Voice: This area of study provides participants practical support to transform teacher
and student learning partnerships both inside and outside of the classroom. Through this
course, participants will critically examine a set of agreed principles which underpin the
development of all student voice work and seek to design a project that enables and enhances
student voice in their own schools. It also evaluates the impact of personalized learning meeting
the needs of more students to a fuller extent than ever before and how this can be embedded in
a school’s curriculum to reach effective and sustainable results.
While undertaking inquiry in the previously mentioned areas as a virtual professional learning
community, TDSB participants had opportunities to design and implement problem-based
learning for their students. Technology was an essential element to this leaning, which included
virtual classrooms, online learning sessions, and teachers working as school teams to design
problem-based learning involving students using digital tools and applications. Some teams
were engaged in collaboration between their students and students in another part of the world.
LITERATURE REVIEW ON EFFECTIVE TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
The quality of teaching is the largest, single variable in a school’s impact on student learning
(Ontario Ministry of Education, 2007). Among elements such as a well-articulated curriculum
and a safe and orderly environment, the one factor that surfaced as the single most influential
component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school (Marzano, 2007).
Therefore, it is vital that teachers engage in effective, ongoing professional learning to
continuously develop their practice.
6 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Professional learning in schools has traditionally consisted of activities such as attending
conferences or working on curriculum during teacher workshop days. However, these strategies
have proved to be inadequate in a number of ways (Kelleher, 2003). Over the past decade a
broader view of teacher professional learning has emerged treating teacher learning as
integrative, social, formal, and informal (Desimone, 2011). The range of opportunities reflects
the complexity of the teaching profession and identifies ways that educators remain current in
their practice (Ontario College of Teachers, n.d.). Webster-Wright (2009) explains the
importance of reframing professional development to focus on learning rather than
development. “A focus on learning with a shift of emphasis from passive development to active
learning implies a different conceptualization of knowledge” (Webster-Wright, 2009, p. 713).
In 2007, the Ontario Ministry of Education’s task force, The Working Table on Teacher
Development, recommended the implementation of the five characteristics of teacher
professional learning: coherent, attentive to adult learning styles, goal orientated, sustainable,
and evidence informed. Figure 1 outlines the Ministry’s cycle of considerations for effective
professional learning.
Figure 1: The Ontario Ministry of Education’s Effective Professional Learning
Despite the extensive literature on effective professional learning, there seems to be little
agreement among professional development researchers or practitioners about the criteria for
effectiveness of professional learning. The characteristics that influence the effectiveness of
professional learning are multiple and complex. Therefore, it is not feasible to assume that a
single list of characteristics leading to policies and guidelines for effective professional
7 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
development will ever emerge. “Still, by agreeing on the criteria for “effectiveness” and providing
clear descriptions of important contextual elements, we can guarantee sure and steady
progress in our efforts to improve the quality of professional development endeavors” (Guskey,
2003, p. 750). Killion (2008) also agrees that the most useful evaluations result from a desire to
improve both the program and its results. Haslam (2010) argues that although the ultimate goal
of teacher professional development is to improve student learning, the more immediate goal
(as reflected in the outcomes and indicators) is improved teacher knowledge, skills, and
practice.
To provide evidence-based decision making in developing effective teacher professional
learning in the TDSB, an attempt has been made to design a comprehensive and generic
framework and associated research instrument(s) for evaluating professional learning in the
Board. The evaluation framework will focus not only on outcomes of professional learning but
also on each phase of the implementation of teacher professional learning.
TDSB’S FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
The design of this comprehensive and generic framework for evaluating teacher professional
learning in the TDSB is intended to reflect effective evaluation practices for professional
learning as identified in the literature. It incorporates many of the same elements/critical
features found within the current literature on professional learning evaluations and expands on
a conceptual framework developed by Desimone, Porter, Garet, Yoon, and Birman (2002,
2009) that represents a “theory of change” from professional development (PD) activities to
changes in knowledge, practice, and outcomes (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Desimone’s Core Conceptual Framework for Studying the
Effects of Professional Development on Teachers and Students
Core Features of
Professional development:
~ Content focus
~ Active learning
~ Coherence
~ Duration
~ Collective participation
Increased teacher
knowledge & skills
Change in attitudes
& beliefs
Change in
instruction
Improved student
learning
Context such as teacher and student characteristics, curriculum, school leadership, policy environment
8 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
As described by Killion (2008), a logic model for program evaluation outlines the program
resources or inputs and the actions or strategies used to produce results. A logic model serves
to guide the evaluation design, particularly in the formative stages, because it identifies both the
initial and intermediate outcomes that serve as benchmarks of the program’s progress towards
its goals.
With the consideration of the Board’s context, the logic model for evaluating all phases of the
implementation of teacher professional learning in the TDSB was developed primarily based on
Guskey’s (2000) compelling five-level evaluation process for determining the best fit of a
teacher professional development program for one's local context (Participants' Reactions,
Participants' Learning, Organization Support and Change, Participants' Use of New Knowledge
and Skills, and Student Learning Outcomes), which emerged from Kirkpatrick’s (1994, 2006)
original business training model which incorporated four levels of training outcomes (Reaction,
Learning, Behaviour, and Results). Both models also reference the commonly used KAS or
KASAB descriptions/levels of learning:
K (Knowledge) = factual information, conceptual understanding
A (Attitudes) = beliefs
S (Skills) = strategies
A (Aspirations) = motivation, desire
B (Behaviours) = transfer/application of knowledge
Figure 3 shows the key components of the TDSB’s logic model for evaluating teacher
professional learning (Erling & Zheng, 2011). It should be noted that this logic model has been
designed as a generic model that can be customized to reflect specific professional learning
programs, and that each initiative will likely require its own unique variation of the logic model
(Haslam, 2010).
9 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
This generic TDSB logic model itemizes a suggested list of professional learning alternatives
and delivery models, again referencing identified best practices. A final evaluation tool could
provide a similar checklist of multiple options, expanded or customized, to reflect the particular
initiative. From a theory of change perspective, the initial planning process for a professional
learning program would have already identified each of the key components and activities of the
program, and outlined the expected sequence of steps. Each of these steps create a link
between the professional learning event(s) and the intended outcome(s) and effectively design
the roadmap or pathway leading to the expected changes, thus representing an intentional
program of change rather than an isolated learning event (Killion, 2003).
The TDSB’s logic model identifies three stages of evaluation – initial evaluation, formative
evaluation, summative evaluation – occurring at different points in time with associated
indicators (baseline, interim, and final) to be developed in the research tool(s). The assumption
here is that the professional learning program is an ongoing process and that the activities,
indicators, and evaluation measures will vary at each stage.
10 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Where relevant, contextual factors need to be considered and explained when they have an
impact/influence on or interfere with the delivery, implementation, or effectiveness of the
professional learning initiative. These factors might include:
Board policy and priorities (coherence, consistency with board priorities, directions, etc.)
School leadership support and advocacy
Teacher characteristics (teacher profile – education, experience, skills, grade level,
subject area expertise, beliefs, etc.)
Student characteristics (student demographic/performance profiles; disadvantage, etc.)
Other initiatives occurring simultaneously, competing priorities
Specific evaluation measures would be determined based on the logic model and would
eventually include a description of both the data sources (who) and the data collection methods
(how). A variety of measurement tools/options could be considered (e.g., rating checklists, pre
and post assessments, self-reporting surveys, focus groups, classroom observations, etc.) as
appropriate, cost-effective, or feasible for each evaluation, although not all will necessarily be
used.
Erling and Zheng (2011) also developed an associated research instrument (a generic question
item bank) to measure the various indicators in the three stages of the evaluation in the TDSB’s
logic model (initial, formative, and summative evaluations). With adequate inputs of the
professional learning, such as evidence-based needs assessment and well-defined and
research-based content, the effectiveness of teacher professional learning can be assessed by
measuring teachers’ perceptions, new knowledge and skills, changes in teaching practice,
changes in organizational supporting structure, and improved student academic achievement
and school engagement.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND METHODOLOGY
Mixed research methods, which include both qualitative and quantitative research, have been
used in this study. Creswell (2003) defines a mixed methods research as a research design with
philosophical assumptions as well as methods of inquiry. As a methodology, it involves
philosophical assumptions that guide the direction of the collection and analysis of data and the
mixture of qualitative and quantitative approaches in many phases in the research process. As a
method, it focuses on collecting, analyzing, and mixing both quantitative and qualitative data in
a single study or series of studies. Its central premise is that the use of quantitative and
11 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
qualitative approaches in combination provides a better understanding of research problems
than either approach alone.
Several aspects of this teacher professional learning were investigated in this research using
the mixed research methods: participating teachers’ perception towards their knowledge and
skills, particularly in using technologies and online learning, their teaching practice, as well as
the impact of the support from their school administrators and the Teaching and Learning staff.
The three centred research questions are:
1. How effective is this teacher professional learning? Have teachers changed their
attitudes and beliefs towards teaching? Have teachers gained the new knowledge and
skills required to teach? Have they applied the new knowledge and skills in their
teaching practice?
2. What is the impact of this teacher professional learning on students’ academic
achievement and school engagement, when controlling other factors such as students’
socio-economic status and prior attainment?
3. What is the impact of the support provided by TDSB administrators and Teaching and
Learning staff on participating teachers’ teaching and learning?
To answer these research questions, the study employed pre and post teacher questionnaires
(see Appendix A and B) according to the TDSB’s framework for evaluating teacher professional
learning described in the previous section. The questionnaires used the same items to measure
participants’ perception on their knowledge and skills, teaching practice, attitude and beliefs,
and on the support they have received from their schools and from the TDSB.
As there are three focus areas of inquiry, the teacher questionnaires were purposely designed
to have common questions for all participants, and to have specific questions for each focus
area of inquiry, and all participants were asked to complete the same questionnaires. In this
way, teachers and administrators who did not participate in a particular focus area would serve
as the control group for those who participated. The hypothesis is that after the professional
learning participants involved in one focus area of inquiry will have better outcomes in their
knowledge/skills, teaching practice, and attitudes/beliefs, than those who served as the control
group.
12 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
DEMOGRAPHICS AND ACHIEVEMENT OF PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS
The TDSB’s Learning Opportunity Index (LOI) ranks each school based on measures of
external challenges affecting student success. The school with the greatest level of external
challenges is ranked number one and is described as highest on the index. The LOI was
derived from variables such as median family income, percent of families whose income is
below the Low Income Measure (before tax), percent of families receiving social assistance,
adults with low education (without a high school diploma), adults with university degrees or
above, and percent of lone-parent families. These variables were calculated from the 2006
Federal Census and annual income tax data from Revenue Canada and were for families with
school-age children only.
In its 2011 version, the lowest on the index (i.e., with the least external challenges) is 479 for
elementary schools and 109 for secondary schools, as they were ranked separately.
Table 1 shows the 18 participating schools’ demographic characteristics (the overall LOI 2011
rank and actual values for each LOI variables).
Table 1: Demographics of Participating WR3 Schools
LOI 2011
Rank
Adults with
High
Education
(with
university
degree or
above)
Adults with
Low
Education
(without
high
school
diploma)
Single-
Parent
Families
Median
Family
Income
Families
with
Income
below Low
Income
Measure
Families
Receiving
Social
Assistance
Allenby Junior Public School JK-Gr. 6 791 473 71% 2% 19% 184,908$ 11% 4%
Ancaster Public School JK-Gr. 5 102 184 14% 20% 36% 44,170$ 33% 17%
Charles H Best Middle School Gr. 5-8 304 212 39% 11% 29% 41,763$ 42% 23%
Dublin Heights Elementary and Middle School JK-Gr. 8 552 347 44% 8% 26% 47,183$ 32% 15%
Fairbank Middle School JK-Gr. 8 264 105 18% 24% 37% 40,821$ 40% 25%
Faywood Arts-Based Curriculum School JK-Gr. 8 342 374 39% 10% 26% 63,953$ 28% 12%
Flemington Public School JK-Gr. 5 306 7 26% 17% 61% 27,770$ 55% 38%
Glen Park Public School JK-Gr. 6 459 208 35% 13% 37% 47,163$ 36% 20%
Glenview Senior Public School Gr. 7-8 679 465 68% 3% 19% 176,488$ 16% 6%
Ledbury Park Elementary and Middle School JK-Gr. 8 468 440 52% 6% 21% 135,525$ 25% 10%
North Preparatory Junior Public School JK-Gr. 6 205 383 54% 6% 31% 49,865$ 26% 11%
Rockford Public School JK-Gr. 6 564 270 48% 5% 29% 34,618$ 40% 17%
Wilmington Elementary School JK-Gr. 4 299 274 38% 11% 27% 45,545$ 37% 18%
John Polanyi Collegiate Institute Gr. 9-12 568 10 29% 16% 46% 33,813$ 45% 28%
Lawrence Park Collegiate Institute Gr. 9-12 1170 109 64% 4% 20% 169,568$ 21% 10%
Northview Heights Secondary School Gr. 9-12 1391 75 41% 9% 29% 42,386$ 38% 18%
Vaughan Road Academy Gr. 9-12 550 68 35% 15% 33% 51,838$ 35% 19%
William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute Gr. 9-12 1274 82 39% 11% 27% 53,438$ 34% 17%
School NameGrade
Range
Learning Opportunities Index (LOI) 2011: Rank and Variables
Enrolment
(October
31, 2012)
13 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
One can see that the socio-economic status of school communities varies from very low [e.g.,
Flemington PS (ranked 7 among elementary schools), John Polanyi CI (ranked 10 among
secondary schools)] to very high [e.g., Allenby Junior PS (ranked 473 among the 479
elementary schools), Lawrence Park CI (ranked 109 among the 109 secondary schools)], and in
between. Student enrolment (as of October 2012) varies from 102 (Ancaster PS) to 791
students (Allenby Junior PS) for elementary schools, and from 550 (Vaughan Road Academy)
to 1,391 students (Northview Heights SS) for secondary schools. Therefore, it can be concluded
that participants of this professional learning initiative came from a wide range of TDSB schools
with different sizes and socio-economic status.
The Ontario’s standard Grade 3 and 6 Assessments of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics, the
Grade 9 Assessment of Mathematics, and the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT)
are administered annually by the province’s Education Quality and Accountability Office
(EQAO). For the Grade 3, 6, and 9 assessments, Level 3 is the provincial standard. Passing the
OSSLT (or passing the Ontario Secondary Literacy Course) is one of the Ontario Secondary
School Diploma (OSSD) requirements.
Figures 4 to 6 show the results for all the schools in the West Region 3 from these EQAO
assessments for the past two school years, and Figure 7 shows the Grades 9 to 12 credit
accumulation information for the five secondary schools.
14 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Overall, schools in the West Region 3 performed well on these provincial assessments: they
achieved above the Board or the Province averages in all the measures but one (the 2011-12
Grade 9 Applied Mathematics). It should be noted that the proportion of students taking the
2011-12 Grade 9 Applied-level Mathematics Assessment in this Family of Schools (21%) is
lower than the Board (29%) or the Province (30%). In credit accumulation, the WR3 secondary
school students achieved better than the Board averages in all grades.
BACKGROUNDS OF PARTICIPANTS
Participants of this teacher professional learning were asked about their background information
such as gender, years of teaching experience, positions with the Board, and teaching
qualifications. This section summarizes these background information based on participants’
responses to the survey questions administered to them during the first learning session.
Participants by Focus Area of Inquiry
Table 2 shows the number of participants in the three focus areas of inquiry. In total 107
educators (89 teachers and 18 administrators) participated in the three focus areas of this
teacher professional learning initiative.
Table 2: Number of Participants by Focus Areas of Inquiry
Focus Area of Inquiry School
Teachers School
Administrators Teaching and Learning Staff
Total
Project-based Learning for Global Citizenship 25 2 12 39
Empowering Student Voice in Education 25 7 14 46
Education for Environmental Stewardship 9 2 11 22
Total 59 11 37 107
Gender
Sixty-five percent (65%) of participants are female and 35% are male.
15 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Role with the Board
Educators across the Board are
well-represented: 29% are from
the Board’s Teaching and
Learning Department, 12% are
school administrators, and 59%
are school teachers [11%, 10%,
9% and 24% teach in the Primary,
Junior, Intermediate and Senior
Divisions, and 5% are school
resource teachers (teaching
English Language Learners,
Special Education, and teacher librarians etc.)]
Teaching Experience
Educators from all age groups are
well-represented: 12% have five or
fewer years of teaching experience,
22% have 6-10 years’ teaching
experience, 26% have 11-15 years’
teaching experience, 15% have 16-20
years’ teaching experience, and 25%
have more than 20 years’ teaching
experience.
16 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Teaching Qualifications Table 3: Teaching Qualifications of Participants
As shown in Table 3, the wide
range of participants’ teaching
qualifications indicates that they
represent TDSB teachers well in
terms of teaching qualifications
and subject areas. It should be
noted that teachers can have
multiple teaching qualifications.
TEACHER PERCEPTIONS ON THE BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
As mentioned earlier, pre and post teacher questionnaires were administered to
teachers/administrators participating in this professional learning initiative during a three-month
period from March to May 2013. The teacher questionnaires (see Appendix A and B) were
designed according to the TDSB’s Teacher Professional Learning Evaluation Framework and
the associated research instrument (Erling & Zheng, 2011), measuring the following four
aspects of the teacher professional learning:
New Knowledge/Skills
Change in Teaching Practice
Change in Attitudes/Beliefs
Change in Organizational Supporting Structure
The following results are based on the 102 and 75 returned pre and post questionnaires from
participants of this professional learning.
New Knowledge and Skills
Both the pre and post questionnaires had 22 items asking all participants about their knowledge
and skills for teaching and learning. By design, the items can be classified into three categories:
1) Generic Knowledge/Skills for Classroom Teaching (Items 1 to 8)
2) Generic Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning (Items 9 to 13)
3) Specific Knowledge/Skills for the Three Focus Areas of Inquiry:
Global Education (Items 14, 17, and 20)
Environmental Stewardship (Items 15, 18, and 21)
Student Voice (Items 16, 19, and 22)
Teaching Qualifications Count Percent
Primary 49 48%
Junior 69 68%
Intermediate 77 75%
Senior 54 53%
Special Education 35 34%
Principal's Qualification Program (PQP) 28 27%
Literacy related subjects (Intermediate/Senior) 23 23%
Mathematics (Intermediate/Senior) 15 15%
Science and Technology (Intermediate/Senior) 19 19%
Arts (Intermediate/Senior) 12 12%
17 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Figures 10 to 12 show the pre and post questionnaire results in these three categories.
Not surprising participants’ generic knowledge and skills for classroom teaching did not change
dramatically after the professional learning as this category of knowledge/skills was not the
focus areas of inquiry, and the vast majority already considered themselves as having ‘expert’
or ‘competent’ levels of knowledge/skills before the professional learning (see Figure 10).
1) Knowing how to determine the different learning needs of
students
2) Asking higher-order questions to all students
3) Using a continuum to plan trajectory of lessons
4) Communicating learning goals and/or targets to students prior
to the task
5) Using a variety of assessment practices to plan for effective
instruction
6) Providing activities that identify similarities and differences
7) Using task specific rubrics for assessing students’ learning
goals when appropriate
8) Devoting equitable time to all students in their learning (e.g.,
opportunities to explain and understand concepts)
Figure 10: Generic Knowledge/Skills for Classroom Teaching: % of Participants with “Expert” or
“Competent” Response
100%
98%
97%
88%
96%
91%
97%
94%
97%
92%
93%
89%
93%
92%
97%
95%
Pre Post
9) Applying inquiry-based learning principles to engage students
in creating change
10) Using interdisciplinary approaches to enrich students’
learning experiences
11) Involving students in goal setting and project
design/assessment
12) Util izing technologies to empower students as active learners
and leaders for the 21st Century
13) Cultivating students' leadership skil ls by having student-led
initiatives and direct action opportunities
Figure 11: Generic Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: % of Participants with
“Expert” or “Competent” Response
96%87%
89%
75%
83%
67%
88%
71%
89%
75%
Pre Post
18 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
After this professional learning, 9-17% more teachers considered them having “expert” or
“competent” knowledge/skills for inquiry-based teaching and learning. The most noticeable
difference occurred at “cultivating students' leadership skills by having student-led initiatives and
direct action opportunities” (17% more) and “utilizing technologies to empower students as
active learners and leaders for the 21st Century” (16% more) (see Figure 11).
Significant gains in participants’ knowledge/skills were observed in all three focus areas of
inquiry: in Global Education 28-37% more participants rated themselves as “expert” or
“competent” in the subject area after the learning initiative. The increases in proportion of
participants with “expert” or “competent” levels of knowledge/skills are 13-20% for
Environmental Stewardship and 16-21% for Student Voice (see Figure 12).
Interestingly, teachers/administrators who did not participate in one particular focus area of
inquiry also showed moderate gains in their knowledge and skills in the subject area (they
completed the same pre and post questionnaires). For example, teachers who participated in
the Global Education course gained 0.5 point (from 2.5 to 3.0) in average score (the highest
14) Integrating global educational concepts into the curriculum
17) Enriching students’ collaborative and cross-cultural learning
experiences from global partnerships
20) Creating a culture of global leadership, in which students are
empowered to engage in controversial global issues and create
positive change
15) Understanding the pedagogies that drive environmental
education
18) Knowing how to ensure longevity and recognition of
environmental projects
21) Fitting environmental principles into various disciplines and
subject areas
16) Using student voice in informing your professional
development
19) Knowing how to embed student voice in your
classroom/school
22) Util izing student voice as a pathway for student success to
meet curriculum goals
Figure 12: Specific Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: % of Participants with
“Expert” or “Competent” Response
70%
42%
84%
47%
75%
55%
58%
45%
92%
73%
90%
71%
90%
69%
90%
74%
91%
61%
Pre Post
19 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
score is 4 points and the lowest score is 1 point), while teachers who participated in the other
two courses gained 0.3 point (from 2.4 to 2.7) in average score for items related to Global
Education. This phenomenon might be explained that during the three months of learning,
participants from different courses had plenty of opportunities to share their knowledge and
learning experience, especially with the presence of online learning platforms and virtual
classrooms.
Teaching Practice
There are 21 items in the pre and post questionnaires asking participants their levels of teaching
practice. Similarly, these items have been designed to fit into two categories:
1) Generic Teaching Practice (Items 1 to 10); and
2) Specific Teaching Practice on the Three Focus Areas of Inquiry:
Global Education (Items 11, 14, 17, and 19)
Environmental Stewardship (Items 12, 15, and 20)
Student Voice (Items 13, 16, 18, and 21)
Figures 13 and 14 show participants’ self-rating of their levels of teaching practice in these two
categories at the beginning and the end of the professional learning.
20 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
After the professional learning, up to 14% more participants indicated that they had “proficient”
or “routine” levels of practice in applying these generic yet proven to be effective teaching
strategies (see Figure 13). The most significant increases occurred at:
Item 9 - Celebrating student achievement throughout the unit (e.g., work displayed, letter
to home): 14% increase (from 74% to 88%)
Item 5 - Providing just in time learning for every student: 13% increase (from 75% to
88%); and
Item 8 - Providing explicit ongoing feedback for students’ progress towards their learning
goals throughout the unit: 10% increase (from 86% to 96%)
1) Planning lessons based on information you have gathered
about students' thinking of the topic
2) Providing opportunities for group learning
3) Having students use concrete materials and models to
represent their thinking
4) Anticipating student responses to questions
5) Providing just in time learning for every student
6) Helping students to identify and correct errors
7) Providing students opportunities to activate prior knowledge
and make connections to new content
8) Providing explicit ongoing feedback for students’ progress
towards their learning goals throughout the unit
9) Celebrating student achievement throughout the unit (e.g., work
displayed, letter to home)
10) Ensuring all homework has a clear purpose, with relevance to
identified learning goals
Figure 13: Generic Practice for Classroom Teaching: % of Participants with “Proficient” or “Routine”
Response
99%
98%
89%
86%
97%
90%
88%
75%
96%
90%
99%
95%
96%
86%
88%
74%
93%
87%
91%
85%
Pre Post
21 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
For specific practice for inquiry-based teaching and learning, significant increases in proportion
of participants with “proficient” or “routine” levels of teaching practice was observed in all the
items directly related to the three focus areas of inquiry: 13-27% in Global Education, 9-11% in
Environmental Stewardship, and 23-38% in Student Voice. The most significant improvement
occurred in these areas:
Global Education - Working with colleagues to develop authentic global education
projects (Item 14): 27% increase (from 32% to 59%);
Environmental Stewardship - Developing a sense of environmental literacy in students
(Items 12); Connecting with other teachers to boost the presence of environmental
issues in your school community (Item 15): 11% increase (from 64% to 75%);
Student Voice (Item 21) - Designing student voice projects to meet curriculum goals and
school policies s: 38% increase (from 52% to 90%).
11) Employing the concept of theme-based education to facil itate
global education activities
14) Working with colleagues to develop authentic global
education projects
17) Util izing the strengths of school community for planning
global education projects
19) Planning student-driven global learning and leadership
development projects using all available e-technologies
12) Developing a sense of environmental l iteracy in students
15) Connecting with other teachers to boost the presence of
environmental issues in your school community
20) Developing environmental education competencies using
online and offline tools and platforms
13) Ensuring student voice projects are effective and sustainable
16) Using student voice to create learning partnerships between
students and teachers
18) Using social networking and media to empower student voice
at a local and global level
21) Designing student voice projects to meet curriculum goals
and school policies
Figure 14: Specific Practice for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: % of Participants with “Proficient”
or “Routine” Response
59%
32%
53%
32%
47%
34%
75%
64%
75%
64%
50%
41%
83%
60%
83%
48%
55%
31%
90%
52%
75%
55%
Pre Post
22 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Attitudes and Beliefs
In both the pre and post questionnaires participants were asked three types of questions about
their attitudes and beliefs about classroom teaching and student learning:
1) Attitudes/Beliefs about Generic Classroom Teaching and Student Learning (Items 1 to 3)
2) Attitudes/Beliefs about Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning (Items 4 to 6), and
3) Attitudes/Beliefs in the Three Specific Focus Areas of Inquiry in Global Education,
Environmental Stewardship, and Student Voice (Items 7 to 9)
Figures 15 to 17 show the results in these three categories.
Not surprisingly almost all participants (93-100%) had very positive attitudes and beliefs for the
three generic questions about classroom teaching and student learning (see Figure 15).
Almost all participants (97-99%) were confident in their abilities to implement inquiry-based
teaching and learning, but not all of them were confident that they can use technologies to
assist their teaching (pre: 82%; post: 88%) (see Figure 16).
1) I believe all students can learn.
2) I believe that I can provide intervention in a whole class
setting.
3) I can differentiate my instruction for different needs of my
students.
Figure 15: Attitudes/Beliefs about Generic Classroom Teaching and Student Learning: % of Participants
with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response
93%
94%
99%
98%
99%
100%
Pre Post
4) I am confident in my ability to use e-technologies to assist my
teaching.
5) I am confident in my ability to implement student-centered
approaches in my teaching.
6) I am confident in my ability to implement interdisciplinary
studies approaches in my teaching.
Figure 16: Attitudes/Beliefsabout Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: % of Participants with
“Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response
99%
97%
99%
97%
88%
82%
Pre Post
Figure 16: Attitudes/Beliefs about Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning: % of Participants with “Strongly Agreed” or “Agreed” Response
23 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
The vast majority of participants (91-100%) had confidence in creating a positive school culture
in the three focus areas of inquiry, indicating they are a highly aspirated group of educators in
these aspects (see Figure 17).
Organizational Supporting Structures
In the pre and post questionnaires participants were asked the same set of questions about how
they view their school environment for collaborated learning, and how much supports they have
received from their school administrators and colleagues. The results are shown in Figure 18.
7) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture
of global leadership focused on positive global change.
8) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture
of environmental stewardship.
9) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture
that facilitates student voice.
Figure 17: Attitudes/Beliefs in the Three Specific Focus Areas of Inquiry: % of Participants with
“Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response
91%
100%
100%
98%
94%
92%
Pre Post
1) New ideas and improvement efforts are encouraged and
supported by the school administrative team.
2) New ideas and teaching strategies are regularly shared at staff
meetings.
3) Adequate time is provided for teachers to implement new ideas
and teaching strategies.
4) Regular follow-up support is provided for new initiatives.
5) My colleagues collaborate and share a commitment to improve
teaching and student learning.
6) There are opportunities for sharing with colleagues from other
schools.
7) There is a commitment to provide adequate planning,
preparation and self-reflection time for staff.
8) Successes are acknowledged and shared.
Figure 18: Organizational Supporting Structures: % of Participants with “Great Extent” or “Moderate
Extent” Response
58%
61%
55%
53%
49%
55%
84%
67%
46%
37%
52%
45%
66%
72%
88%
89%
Pre Post
24 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Participants’ perceptions on the level of organizational support they received varied widely from
low [There are opportunities for sharing with colleagues from other schools (pre: 37%)] to high
[New ideas and improvement efforts are encouraged and supported by the school
administrative team (pre: 89%; post: 88%)], and in between (see Figure 18).
When comparing their perceptions before and after the professional learning, the most positive
change occurred at teacher collaboration within the same school (Item 5: My colleagues
collaborate and share a commitment to improve teaching and student learning), with 84% of
participants agreeing with the statement after the professional learning. This is a 17% increase
from their opinions at the beginning. Interestingly the next largest perception change (9% more)
came from teacher collaboration from different schools (Item 6: There are opportunities for
sharing with colleagues from other schools), from 37% of participants agreeing in the beginning
to 46% agreeing in the end. This is also the same question that had the lowest score from
participants at the beginning (see Figure 18).
Overall Experience
In the post teacher questionnaire participants were asked 17 questions about their overall
learning experience and satisfaction with this professional learning. Figure 19 shows their
responses to these questions.
25 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
The majority (59%) of participants felt this professional learning activity was a successful
learning experience, which was good news for the TDSB; however, the most exciting findings
are that the vast majority of participants planned to apply/integrate the new knowledge/skills
they acquired from this professional learning to their daily teaching practice:
Item 14 - I am able to modify the use of these new knowledge/skills within my own
context to improve the impact on students: 85% strongly agreed or agreed;
1) The objectives and goals for the initiative were clearly
articulated.
2) The objectives for the initiative were based on identified
student learning needs.
3) The content was relevant to our school’s improvement plan and
goals.
4) The content was relevant to my own professional needs.
5) The content was focussed on quality, evidence-based best
practices.
6) The difficulty level of the content was about right for me.
7) The activities were well planned and organized.
8) My overall understanding of the content area was enhanced.
9) I gained new knowledge and skil ls that has direct and practical
value for doing my job.
10) I feel more competent and confident about my abilities in
teaching this topic.
11) I need more information and training about this topic in order
for me to use the strategies effectively.
12) I need more time to explore and reflect on what I learned in
order for me to use the strategies effectively.
13) I intend to transfer and apply newly acquired knowledge and
skil ls to my daily practice in the classroom right away.
14) I am able to modify the use of these new knowledge/skills
within my own context to improve the impact on students.
15) There is a collective commitment among my colleagues to
implement the vision of this professional learning initiative.
16) Overall I feel this professional learning activity was a
successful learning experience for me.
17) I would recommend this activity to my colleagues.
Figure 19: Overall Experience: % of Participants with “Strongly Agree” or “Agree” Response
53%
49%
56%
62%
58%
66%
45%
59%
63%
63%
55%
80%
74%
85%
46%
59%
53%
26 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Item 12 - I need more time to explore and reflect on what I learned in order for me to use
the strategies effectively: 80% strongly agreed or agreed; and
Item 13 - I intend to transfer and apply newly acquired knowledge and skills to my daily
practice in the classroom right away: 74% strongly agreed or agreed
The least agreed item (45% of participants strongly agreed or agreed) is about the
planning/organizing of the event (time between sessions was too short, not given enough time
to finish the course project, etc.).
General Comments about the Professional Learning
Participants were given three opportunities in the post questionnaire to write down their general
comments about what they have liked the most, what their biggest challenges were in this
professional learning, and what suggestions they can provide to the TDSB for future
professional learning. Following is a summary of these comments.
1) What specific elements or activities of this professional learning initiative do you think were
the most useful for you?
In general, teachers and administrators attending the professional learning enjoyed being able
to work together with their colleagues and engage in discussion and share ideas. Another trend
among participants was being able to collaborate on projects. They enjoyed the resources and
articles that were provided and believed that it helped to expand their knowledge and technical
vocabulary on the subject matter. Additionally, many participants appreciated having access to
experts in this field of online learning. They enjoyed having the opportunity to engage in
professional dialogues with their colleagues as well as the Teaching and Learning staff.
Participants enjoyed being able to practice things hands on with the various technologies and
learn new ideas of incorporating global issues into their curriculum and teaching students. They
felt that the use of online communication tools played an integral role while being able to reflect
on their learning process through various reflection papers. They also felt that it was important
to connect with different schools and they enjoyed this aspect of the course.
27 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
2) What do you think was (or will be) the most significant/beneficial change in your teaching
practices as a result of this professional learning initiative?
Teachers and administrators felt more confidence, access, and awareness in the subject area of
e-learning as their knowledge and skills were increased through attending this professional
learning initiative. They noted that their lessons were given more focus on global issues.
Another common trend among participants was a shift in focus to student voice in the classroom
and understanding the importance of student voice in the classroom. Participants believed that it
is important to build global citizenship skills with students in the classroom through giving more
emphasis to student voice and empathy to students as well as making learning relevant to
students. Some participants felt that their learning and pedagogy was not impacted from the
course due to previous knowledge and research that they had or time constraints in the
classroom which has impacted the implementation of their new knowledge and skills with their
students.
Participants felt that their new knowledge and skills could provide stimulating learning
experiences to students and cater to various learning styles. They understood the important
impact technology has in the classroom and learning environment, and felt that the new
resources they were provided with could increase student engagement and help students reach
realistic outcomes. Participants also felt that they could make their students more aware of
global issues and current events. Additionally, some teachers mentioned being pleased to have
the opportunity to use the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model to develop learning activities
and assessment pieces for their classes.
3) Do you have any suggestions or comments?
Many participants felt that a collaborative effort was missing from their learning experience and
they expressed that they wish they would have had more time and access in collaborating with
their colleagues from other schools. Additionally, some felt that the content was not applicable
to the diverse learning population of the TDSB and the lack of Canadian content did not
promote an informative learning experience.
28 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Participants would have liked to have more hands on examples and step-by-step explanation of
the various interfaces, applications, and problem based learning. Some participants did not like
having to miss multiple days from their classrooms and felt that it was redundant to travel to the
course location if they were going to sit in a room and all watch one screen, they felt that this
was not the purpose of an online learning course. Some participants noted a lack of
engagement among participants as there was too much listening and lecturing and not enough
discussion promoted among themselves. Some participants noted that they were not given
enough information about the course prior to registering and felt that they were misled and that
the course did not meet their expectations. There was opposing viewpoints on the course
duration, some felt that the course should have been shortened and condensed while others
believed that it should have taken place throughout the whole year spread out with the ability to
start from their own school or homes.
Participants noted the technical issues (e.g., wireless connections) impacted the learning
environment although they felt the speaker was knowledgeable. They felt that the speaker could
not provide them with information current to Canadian content and the TDSB. Some participants
felt that some of the assignments were repetitive, time consuming, and the workload was a bit
too much at times. They also felt that the feedback to their assignments was not adequate or
constructive. Another common trend among participants was that they felt that the course was a
bit disorganized at times and that aspects of the course should not be changed mid-way through
the course. They hoped that they would have had more time to work on projects during class
time and have more collaboration time outside the classroom. Some mentioned that the pace
was too slow and that the course readings and lectures did not correlate to each other well.
29 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Guided by the TDSB’s generic framework for evaluating the effectiveness of teacher
professional learning, this research study examined the 2012-13 blended professional learning
with technologies, and attempted to assess the impact of this professional learning on the 107
participating teachers and administrators from 18 TDSB schools and the Board’s Teaching and
Learning department. The study employed pre and post teacher questionnaires to evaluate the
effectiveness of the professional learning in the areas of teacher knowledge/skills, teaching
practice, attitudes/beliefs, as well as organizational supporting structures.
Figure 20 shows the overall summary of the participants’ perceptions on the professional
learning in these categories and their satisfaction with this professional learning initiative.
The vast majority of participants (93%) indicated that they had “expert” or “competent” levels for
generic knowledge and skills for classroom teaching, and their perceptions did not change
dramatically after the professional learning (96%). However, 14% more participants considered
themselves as having “expert” or “competent” knowledge/skills for inquiry-based teaching and
learning, and 24% more for the three specific focus areas of inquiry (32% more in Global
Education, 17% more in Environmental Stewardship, and 18% more in Student Voice). Overall,
11% more (from 81% to 92%) participants considered themselves as having “expert” or
“competent” knowledge/skills after this professional learning.
Teachers and administrators who did not participate in one particular focus area of inquiry also
showed moderate gains in their knowledge and skills in the subject area (they completed the
same pre and post questionnaires). For example, participants in the Global Education course
gained 0.5 point in average score, while participants in the other two courses gained 0.3 point in
average score for items related to teaching Global Education. This phenomenon might be
explained that during the three months of learning participants from different courses had plenty
of opportunities to share their knowledge and learning experience, especially with the presence
of online learning platforms and virtual classrooms.
30 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
After the professional learning, 7% more participants indicated that they had “proficient” or
“routine” levels of practice in generic yet proven to be effective teaching strategies, and 22%
more participants considered themselves as having “proficient” or “routine” levels in inquiry-
based classroom teaching and student learning (20% more in Global Education, 11% in
Environmental Stewardship, and 30% in Student Voice). Overall, 11% more participants (from
75% to 86%) considered themselves as having “proficient” or “routine” levels of teaching
practice after this professional learning.
Generic Knowledge/Skills for Classroom Teaching
Generic Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and
Learning
Specific Knowledge/Skills for Inquiry-based Teaching and
Learning
Knowledge/Skills: Overall
Generic Practice for Classroom Teaching
Specific Practice for Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning
Teaching Practice: Overall
Attitudes/Beliefs about Generic Classroom Teaching and Student
Learning
Attitudes/Beliefs about Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning
Attitudes/Beliefs in the Three Specific Focus Areas of Inquiry
Attitudes/Beliefs: Overall
Organizational Supporting Structures
Overall Experience
Figure 20: Overall Summary of the TDSB 2012-13 Blended Professional Learning: % of Participants
Meeting Expectations
89%
75%
84%
60%
92%
81%
93%
87%
68%
45%
86%
75%
97%
97%
95%
92%
96%
96%
96%
95%
62%
60%
60%
96%
93%
Pre Post
31 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Almost all participants (97%) had very positive attitudes and beliefs about generic classroom
teaching and student learning, and they had the same attitudes and beliefs in these areas after
the professional learning. They were also confident in their abilities to implement inquiry-based
teaching and learning (pre: 92%; post: 95%). The vast majority of participants (96%) had
confidence in creating a positive school culture in the three focus areas of inquiry, indicating
they are a highly aspirated group of educators in their attitudes and beliefs overall (pre: 95%;
post: 96%).
Overall, the majority of participants (pre: 60%; post: 62%) were satisfied with the level of support
they received from their schools or from the TDSB. When comparing their perceptions before
and after the professional learning, the most positive change occurred at teacher collaboration
within the same school, with 84% of participants agreeing after the professional learning. This is
a 17% increase from their opinions at the beginning. The next largest perception change (9%
more) came from teacher collaboration from different schools, from 37% of participants agreeing
in the beginning to 46% agreeing in the end.
In general, teachers and administrators attending the professional learning enjoyed being able
to work together with their colleagues and the Teaching and Learning staff, engage in
discussion and share ideas. They appreciated the resources and articles that were provided and
believed that it helped to expand their knowledge and technical vocabulary on the subject
matter. Additionally, many participants enjoyed being able to practice things hands on with the
various technologies and learn new ideas of incorporating global issues into their curriculum and
teaching students. They felt that the use of online communication tools played an integral role
while being able to reflect on their learning process through various reflection papers. Overall
the majority of participants (60%) felt this professional learning activity was a successful
learning experience.
For next steps, 74% indicated that they intended to transfer and apply newly acquired
knowledge/skills to daily practice in the classroom right away, 85% indicated that they were able
to modify the use of these new knowledge/skills within their own context to improve the impact
on students, and 80% felt they need more time to explore and reflect on what they had learned
in order for them to use the strategies effectively.
32 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
The least agreed item (45% of participants strongly agreed or agreed) is about the
planning/organizing of the event (time between sessions was too short, not given enough time
to finish the course project, etc.).
Although the short-term results listed in this report are positive and encouraging, further studies
are necessary to track the progress of the teachers and school administrators involved in the
professional learning initiative, especially their teaching practice in the three focus areas of
inquiry. A further analysis is recommended on the differentiated effects of participating teachers’
and their students’ background characteristics and school demographics on students’ learning
and school engagement.
33 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
REFERENCES
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method
approaches, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development:
Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181.
Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Kappan, 92(6), 68-71.
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K., S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of
professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal
study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81.
Erling, S., & Zheng, S. (2011). Logic model for evaluating professional learning in the Toronto
District School Board. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board.
Erling, S., & Zheng, S. (2011). Assessing effectiveness of professional learning in the TDSB:
Framework and samples for a generic question item bank. Toronto, Ontario, Canada:
Toronto District School Board.
Kelleher, J. (2003). A model for assessment-driven professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan,
June, 751-756.
Killion, J. (2003). Solid footwork makes evaluation of staff development programs a song. JSD
Fall 24(4).
Killion, J. (2008). Assessing impact: Evaluating staff development: 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Corwin.
Kirkpatrick, D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-
Koehler Publishers Inc.
Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Guskey, T. (2003). What makes professional development effective. Phi Delta Kappan, June,
748-750.
34 | P a g e THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD’S
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING IN THE 2012-2013 BLENDED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Haslam, M. (2010). Teacher professional development evaluation guide. Prepared for the
National Staff Development Council (NSDC).
Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching. Alexandra, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ontario College of Teachers. (n.d.). The professional learning framework for the teaching
profession. Retrieved from http://www.oct.ca/publications/PDF/framework_e.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). Report to the partnership table on teacher professional
learning: Recommendations of the working table on teacher development. Retrieved
from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/teacher/pdfs/partnerReport.pdf
Presley, A., Zheng, S., & Erling, S. (2011). Effective professional learning: Review of the
literature (Research Brief). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board.
Toronto District School Board. (2011). Mathematics junior intervention initiative (Research
Report). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board.
Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding
authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702-739.
Thank you for participating in this teacher professional learning survey. Your responses will help the Boardunderstand current classroom practices, and identify professional development needs in continuous efforts toimprove student learning. While your participation is voluntary, your assistance is essential for the survey results to beaccurate. This survey is anonymous and confidential. The findings of the survey will not be used to evaluate you oryour school.
Please create your unique identification by using the first letters of your mother’s first name and last name, and thetwo digits of your birth month and day (for example, if your mother’s name is Mary Smith, and you were born on April25, your identification for this study would be ‘MS0425’). This same identification will be used again in a later survey inorder for the Board to link and analyze the responses of both surveys while not identifying you or your school:
Instructions for filling out form: For optimum accuracy,please use a black pen or dark pencil.
A. Your Background Information
0 - 3 4 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 More than 20
5) The eLearning course you are taking is:
3) How many years have you been teaching?
4) What are your teaching qualifications (select all that apply):
Primary Junior Intermediate
Senior Special Education PQP
Literacy related subjects (Intermediate/Secondary)
Mathematics (Intermediate/Senior)
Science and Technology (Intermediate/Senior)
Arts (Intermediate/Senior)
Page 1 of 4
Professional Learning with E-Technologies 2012-13: Teacher Questionnaire
1) You are: Male Female
2) Please describe your role with the Board (please choose only one):
Teaching and Learning Staff
School Administrator
School Resource Teacher (ELL / SERT / Teacher Librarian, etc.)
Primary Division Teacher
Junior Division Teacher
Intermediate Division Teacher
Secondary School Teacher: Subject Area
Project-based Learning for Global Citizenship
Education for Environmental Stewardship
Empowering Student Voice in Education
13485
1) Knowing how to determine the different learning needs of students
2) Asking higher-order questions to all students
3) Using a continuum to plan trajectory of lessons
4) Communicating learning goals and/or targets to students prior tothe task
5) Using a variety of assessment practices to plan for effectiveinstruction
6) Providing activities that identify similarities and differences
11) Involving students in goal setting and project design/assessment
12) Utilizing technologies to empower students as active learnersand leaders for the 21st Century
13) Cultivating students' leadership skills by having student-ledinitiatives and direct action opportunities
14) Integrating global educational concepts into the curriculum
B. Please describe your current level of knowledge/skills in the following areas:
8) Devoting equitable time to all students in their learning (e.g.,opportunities to explain and understand concepts)
7) Using task specific rubrics for assessing students’ learning goalswhen appropriate
9) Applying inquiry-based learning principles to engage students increating change
10) Using interdisciplinary approaches to enrich students’ learningexperiences
15) Understanding the pedagogies that drive environmental education
16) Using student voice in informing your professional development
17) Enriching students’ collaborative and cross-cultural learningexperiences from global partnerships
19) Knowing how to embed student voice in your classroom/school
20) Creating a culture of global leadership, in which students areempowered to engage in controversial global issues and createpositive change
18) Knowing how to ensure longevity and recognition of environmentalprojects
21) Fitting environmental principles into various disciplines andsubject areas
22) Utilizing student voice as a pathway for student success to meetcurriculum goals
Page 2 of 4
Expert Competent Novice Limited
13485
1) Planning lessons based on information you have gathered aboutstudents' thinking of the topic
2) Providing opportunities for group learning
3) Having students use concrete materials and models to representtheir thinking
4) Anticipating student responses to questions
5) Providing just in time learning for every student
6) Helping students to identify and correct errors
9) Celebrating student achievement throughout the unit (e.g., workdisplayed, letter to home)
10) Ensuring all homework has a clear purpose, with relevance toidentified learning goals
11) Employing the concept of theme-based education to facilitateglobal education activities
C. Please describe your current level of practice in the following areas:
7) Providing students opportunities to activate prior knowledge andmake connections to new content
8) Providing explicit ongoing feedback for students’ progresstowards their learning goals throughout the unit (e.g., writtenfeedback, reflection time)
15) Connecting with other teachers to boost the presence ofenvironmental issues in your school community
12) Developing a sense of environmental literacy in students
13) Ensuring student voice projects are effective and sustainable
14) Working with colleagues to develop authentic global educationprojects
17) Utilizing the strengths of school community for planning globaleducation projects
18) Using social networking and media to empower student voice at alocal and global level
16) Using student voice to create learning partnerships betweenstudents and teachers
Page 3 of 4
19) Planning student-driven global learning and leadershipdevelopment projects using all available e-technologies
20) Developing environmental education competencies using onlineand offline tools and platforms
21) Designing student voice projects to meet curriculum goals andschool policies
Proficient Routine Beginner Non-use
13485
1) I believe all students can learn.
2) I believe that I can provide intervention in a whole class setting.
3) I can differentiate my instruction for different needs of mystudents.
4) I am confident in my ability to use e-technologies to assist myteaching.
5) I am confident in my ability to implement student-centeredapproaches in my teaching.
6) I am confident in my ability to implement interdisciplinary studiesapproaches in my teaching.
7) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture ofglobal leadership focused on positive global change.
1) New ideas and improvement efforts are encouraged and supported by the school administrative team.
2) New ideas and teaching strategies are regularly shared at staff meetings.
3) Adequate time is provided for teachers to implement new ideas and teaching strategies.
4) Regular follow-up support is provided for new initiatives.
5) My colleagues collaborate and share a commitment toimprove teaching and student learning.
6) There are opportunities for sharing with colleagues from other schools.
7) There is a commitment to provide adequate planning, preparation and self-reflection time for staff.
8) Successes are acknowledged and shared.
D. Please describe how much you agree or disagree with each statement. Choose only one response for each statement.
StronglyAgree Agree Disagree
StronglyDisagree
E. To what extent are the following structures currently in place at your school?
GreatExtent
ModerateExtent
SlightExtent
Not atAll
Suggestions/Comments:
Thank you for your participation!
Page 4 of 4
8) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture ofenvironmental stewardship.
9) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culturethat facilitates student voice.
13485
Thank you for participating again in this teacher professional learning survey. Your responses will help the Boardunderstand current classroom practices, and identify professional development needs in continuous efforts to improvestudent learning. While your participation is voluntary, your assistance is essential for the survey results to be accurate.This survey is anonymous and confidential. The findings of the survey will not be used to evaluate you or your school.
Please enter your unique identification by using the first letters of your mother's first name and last name, and the twodigits of your birth month and day (for example, if your mother’s name is Mary Smith, and you were born on April 25,your identification for this study would be ‘MS0425’). This should be the same unique ID you created in a previoussurvey in March 2013:
Instructions for filling out form: For optimum accuracy,please use a black pen or dark pencil.
Page 1 of 4
Professional Learning with E-Technologies 2012-13: Teacher Questionnaire
The eLearning course you are taking is:
Project-based Learning for Global Citizenship
Education for Environmental Stewardship
Empowering Student Voice in Education
1) Knowing how to determine the different learning needs of students
2) Asking higher-order questions to all students
3) Using a continuum to plan trajectory of lessons
4) Communicating learning goals and/or targets to students prior tothe task
5) Using a variety of assessment practices to plan for effectiveinstruction
6) Providing activities that identify similarities and differences
A. Please describe your current level of knowledge/skills in thefollowing areas:
8) Devoting equitable time to all students in their learning (e.g.,opportunities to explain and understand concepts)
7) Using task specific rubrics for assessing students’ learning goalswhen appropriate
9) Applying inquiry-based learning principles to engage students increating change
10) Using interdisciplinary approaches to enrich students’ learningexperiences
11) Involving students in goal setting and project design/assessment
12) Utilizing technologies to empower students as active learnersand leaders for the 21st Century
13) Cultivating students' leadership skills by having student-ledinitiatives and direct action opportunities
14) Integrating global educational concepts into the curriculum
15) Understanding the pedagogies that drive environmental education
16) Using student voice in informing your professional development
17) Enriching students’ collaborative and cross-cultural learningexperiences from global partnerships
Expert Competent Novice Limited
54561
A. Please describe your current level of knowledge/skills in thefollowing areas: (con't)
20) Creating a culture of global leadership, in which students areempowered to engage in controversial global issues and createpositive change
18) Knowing how to ensure longevity and recognition of environmentalprojects
21) Fitting environmental principles into various disciplines andsubject areas
22) Utilizing student voice as a pathway for student success to meetcurriculum goals
Page 2 of 4
1) Planning lessons based on information you have gathered aboutstudents' thinking of the topic
2) Providing opportunities for group learning
3) Having students use concrete materials and models to representtheir thinking
4) Anticipating student responses to questions
5) Providing just in time learning for every student
6) Helping students to identify and correct errors
9) Celebrating student achievement throughout the unit (e.g., workdisplayed, letter to home)
10) Ensuring all homework has a clear purpose, with relevance toidentified learning goals
11) Employing the concept of theme-based education to facilitateglobal education activities
B. Please describe your current level of practice in the followingareas:
7) Providing students opportunities to activate prior knowledge andmake connections to new content
8) Providing explicit ongoing feedback for students’ progresstowards their learning goals throughout the unit (e.g., writtenfeedback, reflection time)
15) Connecting with other teachers to boost the presence ofenvironmental issues in your school community
12) Developing a sense of environmental literacy in students
13) Ensuring student voice projects are effective and sustainable
14) Working with colleagues to develop authentic global educationprojects
17) Utilizing the strengths of school community for planning globaleducation projects
18) Using social networking and media to empower student voice ata local and global level
16) Using student voice to create learning partnerships betweenstudents and teachers
19) Planning student-driven global learning and leadershipdevelopment projects using all available e-technologies
20) Developing environmental education competencies using onlineand offline tools and platforms
21) Designing student voice projects to meet curriculum goals andschool policies
Proficient Routine Beginner Non-use
19) Knowing how to embed student voice in your classroom/school
Expert Competent Novice Limited
54561
Page 3 of 4
1) I believe all students can learn.
2) I believe that I can provide intervention in a whole class setting.
3) I can differentiate my instruction for different needs of mystudents.
4) I am confident in my ability to use e-technologies to assist myteaching.
5) I am confident in my ability to implement student-centeredapproaches in my teaching.
6) I am confident in my ability to implement interdisciplinary studiesapproaches in my teaching.
7) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture ofglobal leadership focused on positive global change.
1) New ideas and improvement efforts are encouraged and supported by the school administrative team.
2) New ideas and teaching strategies are regularly shared atstaff meetings.
3) Adequate time is provided for teachers to implement new ideas and teaching strategies.
4) Regular follow-up support is provided for new initiatives.
5) My colleagues collaborate and share a commitment toimprove teaching and student learning.
6) There are opportunities for sharing with colleagues from other schools.
7) There is a commitment to provide adequate planning, preparation and self-reflection time for staff.
8) Successes are acknowledged and shared.
C. Please describe how much you agree or disagree with eachstatement. Choose only one response for each statement.
D. To what extent are the following structures currently in placeat your school?
8) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culture ofenvironmental stewardship.
9) I am confident in my ability to help my school create a culturethat facilitates student voice.
StronglyAgree Agree Disagree
StronglyDisagree
1) The objectives and goals for the initiative were clearly articulated.
2) The objectives for the initiative were based on identifiedstudent learning needs.
3) The content was relevant to our school’s improvement planand goals.
4) The content was relevant to my own professional needs.
5) The content was focussed on quality, evidence-based bestpractices.
6) The difficulty level of the content was about right for me.
7) The activities were well planned and organized.
8) My overall understanding of the content area was enhanced.
E. To what degree do the following statements reflect yourexperience with this professional learning Initiative?
GreatExtent
ModerateExtent
SlightExtent
Not atAll
StronglyAgree
Agree DisagreeStronglyDisagree
54561
H. Do you have any suggestions or comments?
Thank you for your participation!
Page 4 of 4
9) I gained new knowledge and skills that has direct and practicalvalue for doing my job.
10) I feel more competent and confident about my abilities inteaching this topic.
11) I need more information and training about this topic in orderfor me to use the strategies effectively.
12) I need more time to explore and reflect on what I learned inorder for me to use the strategies effectively.
14) I am able to modify the use of these new knowledge/skillswithin my own context to improve the impact on students.
E. To what degree do the following statements reflect yourexperience with this professional learning Initiative? (con't)
13) I intend to transfer and apply newly acquired knowledge andskills to my daily practice in the classroom right away.
15) There is a collective commitment among my colleagues toimplement the vision of this professional learning initiative.
16) Overall I feel this professional learning activity was a successfullearninging experience for me.
17) I would recommend this activity to my colleagues.
F. What specific elements or activities of this professional learning initiative do you think were the mostuseful for you?
G. What do you think was (or will be) the most significant/ beneficial change in your teaching practices as aresult of this professional learning initiative?
StronglyAgree Agree Disagree
StronglyDisagree
54561