The Effect of Sports Team Cohesion on Aggression, Cheating and Alcohol Consumption Jenny Braun and...
-
Upload
aubree-urich -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of The Effect of Sports Team Cohesion on Aggression, Cheating and Alcohol Consumption Jenny Braun and...
The Effect of Sports Team The Effect of Sports Team Cohesion on Aggression, Cohesion on Aggression,
Cheating and Alcohol Cheating and Alcohol ConsumptionConsumption
Jenny Braun and Lauren DrewJenny Braun and Lauren Drew
Hanover CollegeHanover College
Team SportsTeam Sports
The ‘need to belong’ is an innate feature The ‘need to belong’ is an innate feature of human nature of human nature (Spink, 1998, Baumeister & Leary, 1995)(Spink, 1998, Baumeister & Leary, 1995)
Teams provide a forum for satisfying the Teams provide a forum for satisfying the fundamental human drive of needing to fundamental human drive of needing to belong belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995)(Baumeister & Leary, 1995)
Definition of CohesionDefinition of Cohesion
When teammates subscribe to the team’s When teammates subscribe to the team’s goals, socialize and pursue common goals goals, socialize and pursue common goals outside the realm of athletic activityoutside the realm of athletic activity
Impact of CohesionImpact of Cohesion
Many positive outcomes associated with cohesion (Spink, 1998; Prapavessis & Carron, 1997)
“Cohesion is associated with increased conformity to group norms” (Prapvessis & Carron, 1997, 232)
“High cohesive groups exerted more pressure on members toward compliance with group norms then did low cohesive groups” (Festinger, Gerard & Hymovitch, 1952 as cited in Prapavessis & Carron, 1997, p. 232)
Aggression and Team SportsAggression and Team Sports
Increased by zero-sum game structure (Lefebvre & Passer, 1974)
One of the most important problems in contemporary sport (Lefebvre & Passer, 1974)
Cultural-spectators prefer events with more aggressive acts (Makela, 1975)
Cheating in Team SportsCheating in Team Sports
“Willful rule violation” - actions which are considered unacceptable are done on purpose to gain benefit, at the potential cost of a penalty (Roberts, 1996)
Tone for acceptable behavior, including cheating, set by institution or team (Roberts, 1996)
Aggression and CheatingAggression and CheatingCheating and aggression are more
prominent:By malesIn older athletesIn individuals who have been playing the sport
longerTeam cohesion positively related to
expectations that teammates would cheat and aggress, and that coach would support behavior (Light Shields et al., 1995)
Team Sports and Alcohol Team Sports and Alcohol ConsumptionConsumption
o Sports team participation is associated with high rates of substance use, including alcohol (Rockafellow & Saules, 2006).
o A study by the NCAA found that over 80% of college athletes drink (Martens, Dams-O’Connor, and Beck, 2006)
HypothesisHypothesis
Perception of higher team cohesiveness Perception of higher team cohesiveness will be associated with more favorable will be associated with more favorable attitudes towards aggression and cheatingattitudes towards aggression and cheating
Teams which are perceived to be highly Teams which are perceived to be highly cohesive will have higher rates of drinkingcohesive will have higher rates of drinking
MethodMethod
ParticipantsObtained through emailing link for survey to
Athletic DirectorsCollege level athletes or former athletes
174 final participants58 Females116 MalesAges 18 – 57
Median age = 19 years oldMean age = 20 years old
Method
ProcedureInformed ConsentParticipants indicate the following:
Sports team(s) (e.g. basketball, soccer, etc.)Position on teamNumber of years participating per sportBasic demographics (age, gender, nationality)
MethodFour Questionnaires
Standard Likert Scale• 1 “Very Strongly Disagree”, 7 “Very Strongly Agree”
Aggression Questionnaire/Performance Attitudes (Buss & Perry, 1992) =.917
Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), (Carron et al., 1985) =.847
Cheating Questionnaire/Performance Motivation =.862
Alcohol Consumption Questionnaire
Results
Non-significant findingsNo significant relationship between GEQ with
aggression or cheatingNo significant relationship between GEQ and
athletes’ frequency of drinkingNo significant relationship between GEQ and
contact vs. non-contact sports
GEQM = 93.36Range: Minimum score=47.00
Maximum score = 126.00
Performance Attitudes/AggressionM = 68.50Range: Minimum score = 27.00
Maximum score = 146.00
Performance Motivation/CheatingM = 21.94Range: Minimum score=6.00
Maximum score= 42.0
Results
Discussion
Cohesion was not shown to be related to any variable except who the athletes reported drinking with
Limited exposure to others outside athletic realm (Martens et al., 2006)
Lack of Relationship Between GEQ, Aggression and Cheating
Possible that cohesion does not specify particular attitude toward aggression and cheating
Teams may have similar attitudes toward aggression and cheating if they are highly cohesive
Perceived team cohesion
Ran
ge o
f att
itu
des
tow
ard
ag
gre
ssio
n a
nd
ch
eati
ng
Discussion-Aggression and Cheating
Line between aggression and cheating is often blurred
Moral reasoning (Shields et al.,1995) Individuals may have different moral
values on athletic field than in everyday life
Future Directions
Measure cohesion in teams and variation in attitudes towards aggression and cheating
Develop measurement to record aggression and cheating from behavior
Explore potential disconnect between morality outside of athletic events and within athletic events