The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS
description
Transcript of The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS
![Page 1: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Scott Corwon, the founder of IMPACTS and leading innovator in th i fi ld f diff i d i th idthe emerging fields of diffusion and price theory, provides contemporary examples of the impact of professional sports pricing relative to demand.
The purpose of the IMPACTS presentation series is to effectuate knowledge transfer concerning topical mathematical and scientificknowledge transfer concerning topical mathematical and scientific issues. Significant published works form the basis for much of the presentation series, and these works are interpreted and presented b i d l d i th t i Th t ti i iby recognized leaders in the topic area. The presentation series is made possible through the generous support of IMPACTS.
![Page 3: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Economics of Modern P f i l S tProfessional Sports
![Page 4: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Why care about sports economics?Why care about sports economics?
S t d ti i d t i bi b i• Sports and recreation industry is a big business.
![Page 5: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Amount Year SourceEstimated Size of the Entire Sports Industry, US $441.1 billion 2007 PRE
Annual Company Spending for Sports Advertising, US $32 billion 2007 PREAnnual Company Spending for Sports Advertising, US $32 billion 2007 PRE
National Football League (NFL)
NFL League Revenues $6.54 billion 2007 PRE
Overall Operating Income $568 million 2007 ForbesOverall Operating Income $568 million 2007 Forbes
Number of NFL teams 32 2008 NFL
Avg NFL Game Attendance 68,661 2007 ESPN
Avg NFL Team Value $957 million 2007 Forbes
Major League Baseball (MLB)
MLB League Revenues $6.08 billion 2007 MLB
Overall Operating Income $492 million 2007 Forbes
Number of MLB teams 30 2008 MLB
Avg MLB Game Attendance 32,767 2007 ESPN
Avg MLB Team Value $472 million 2007 Forbes
PRE: Plunkett Research, Ltd.
![Page 6: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Amount Year Source
National Basketball Association (NBA)National Basketball Association (NBA)
NBA League Revenues $3.57 billion 2007-08 PRE
Overall Operating Income $293 million 2007-08 Forbes
N b f NBA t 30 2007 08 NFLNumber of NBA teams 30 2007-08 NFL
Avg NBA Game Attendance 17,394 2007-08 ESPN
Avg NBA Team Value $372 million 2007-08 Forbes
National Hockey League (NHL)
NHL League Revenues $2.44 billion 2007-08 MLB
Overall Operating Income $95 million 2007-08 Forbes
Number of NHL teams 30 2007-08 MLB
Avg NHL Game Attendance 17,308 2007-08 ESPN
Avg NHL Team Value $200 million 2007-08 Forbesg $
Other Sports Industry Revenue
Other Spectator Sports Leagues $3.7 billion 2008 PRE
Horse Racing $8 4 billion 2008 PREHorse Racing $8.4 billion 2008 PRE
Golf Courses $20.8 billion 2008 PRE
Fitness & Recreational Centers $20.3 billion 2008 PRE
Other Amusement & Recreation $19 3 billion 2008 PREOther Amusement & Recreation $19.3 billion 2008 PRE
![Page 7: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Market ModelMarket Model
• Demand shifters– Income S1
$– Income– Price of related goods– Consumer tastes
Market size
S1
– Market size– Price expectations
D
P1
• Supply shifters– Input prices– Technology
D1
Technology– Taxes– Price expectations– Number of firms
Q1 quantity
– Number of firms
![Page 8: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Price ElasticityPrice Elasticity
• Measure of price sensitivity
QEdΔ
=%
PE
Δ=
% • More substitutes• Big budget items• Longer time horizons
• Elastic demand: |E| > 1
g
| |• Inelastic demand: |E| < 1
![Page 9: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ElasticityElasticity…
QdΔ% TR = $50,000
PQE
ΔΔ
=%
%$ E = ?
82018.01100200
E
50
40TR = $48,000
82.022.0
4510
1100 −==−
=E
D1
tickets1000 1200
![Page 10: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Price ControlsPrice Controls
• Price Ceilings S1Price Ceilings– create shortages– create black markets Pcreate black markets P1
D1
Pceiling
ticketsQ1 Qd
shortage
![Page 11: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Price ControlsPrice Controls
• Price FloorsS1
– Create surplusesPfloor
P1
D1
ticketsQ1Qd
lsurplus
![Page 12: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Maximizing ProfitMaximizing Profit
• Profits = π = TR - TC
• Profit-max rule: MR = MC
•What do the NY Yankees sell?•What kind of cost is Alex Rodriguez’s salary?•What kind of cost is Alex Rodriguez s salary?
![Page 13: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Perfect CompetitionPerfect Competition
SMC$ S
ATC$
MR = PP1
D
Market Firm
Q1q1Quantity
![Page 14: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
MonopolyMonopoly
• Relevant Market– Any close substitutes?y
• Entry BarriersE i f l– Economies of scale
– Control over key input– Government restrictions
![Page 15: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Monopoly Profits are maximizedMonopoly Profits are maximizedwhere MR = MC
Price is set off of demand
MC
curve
$MC
ATCP1
ATC1
D
MRQ1 Quantity
![Page 16: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Pricing Strategy: Phillies vs FlyersPricing Strategy: Phillies vs Flyers
• Each is a monopoly $ MCMC• MC a backward “L”• Does it pay to sell out?
$ MC1MC2
Does it pay to sell out?
P1
P2
P1
MRD
Q1
MRCitizens Bank Park43,500
Wachovia Center19,500
![Page 17: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
2006 Ticket Prices
Phillies Flyers
Game Season Game Season
Field Level $44
$38$39.75$34.75
Victor’s Restaurant $100 $84
$$25
$$21.83
Club Level $27 $24 88
Lower Level$85 $69Level $27
$22$20
$24.88$19.88$17.93
$85 $69
Terrace$30$22
$27.31$19 88
Mezzanine$55$45
$44.50$38$22
$16$19.88$14.88
$45$40$23
$38$31.75
$20
Source: philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com and philadelphiaflyers.com
![Page 18: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Role of UncertaintyThe Role of Uncertainty
• Are the Yankees bad for baseball?– Are dynasties a bad idea?– How often should the home team win?How often should the home team win?
• Why do teams sell season tickets?– Transfers risk from team to fans– Why do fans buy them?y y
![Page 19: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Attendance vs Winning PctAttendance vs Winning Pct.
1
0 60.70.80.9
1
apac
ity
0 60.70.80.9
1
apac
ity
0.20.30.40.50.6
2002
% o
f C
0 20.30.40.50.6
002
% o
f Ca
00.1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
2001 Winning Percentage
2
00.10.2
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
2001 Wi i P t
202001 Winning Percentage 2001 Winning Percentage
NFL MLB
![Page 20: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Can Losing be Good?Can Losing be Good?
• Cleveland Browns won all the time in AAFC• Fans of AAFC lost interestFans of AAFC lost interest
– Even Browns fans– Attendance fell
• Attendance fell in MLB in 1950s – NY teams in every World Series (sort of)– Why go see Pittsburgh play Cincinnati?
• Study looked at attendance in MLBC t ll d f d ti th lit f t– Controlled for day, time, weather, quality of opponent
– Attendance highest when home team won 60% of time
![Page 21: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
R i A l iRegression Analysis
• Regression is a form of statistical l i f i b h i danalysis of economic behavior and
theory.y– Regression analysis attempts to explain the
variance of a particular variable of interestvariance of a particular variable of interest.
• Attendance FunctionA = f(X1, X2, X3, …)
![Page 22: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Regression AnalysisRegression Analysis
• Regression analysis can be used for predictive purposes, but in this presentation predictive purposes, but in this presentation we will use it to test our economic theory.
• Two ways that regression results can confirm• Two ways that regression results can confirm economic theory: The sign and magnitude of the estimated relationship and the statisticalthe estimated relationship and the statistical significance.
![Page 23: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Regression ExampleRegression Example
• Consider a model of baseball attendance. We think that the following items might influence overall team attendance in the following waysg g y
Variable Sign of Relationship
Price NegativePrice Negative
Population Positive
Concession Prices Negative
Income Positive
Team Quality Positive
O t’ Q lit P itiOpponent’s Quality Positive
Weather Ambiguous
A = β0 + β1P + β2POP + β3C + β4I + β5QH + β6QV + β7W
![Page 24: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Here are some actual regression results from Depken (2000, Journal of Sports Economics)Journal of Sports Economics)
![Page 25: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Franchise Economics andFranchise Economics and Owner Objectives j
![Page 26: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Franchise ObjectivesFranchise Objectives• Maximize profits?p
Profit = TR – TC
• Championships?• Bad things can happen if bottom line is forgotten
C O S• Case in point: Ottawa Senators– Best record in NHL: 2002-2003– Declared bankruptcy: 2003
• Ego premium?
• Civic-mindedness?
![Page 27: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Franchise RevenuesFranchise Revenues
TR = RG + RB + RL + RS
– Where:• RG = Gate RevenueG
• RB = Broadcast Revenue• RL = Licensing Revenue• RS = Stadium Revenue
![Page 28: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Gate Revenues: RGate Revenues: RG
R = α R + (1 α)R NFL: α = 60%RG = α Rh + (1- α)Rp• α = home team’s share• Rh = home team gate
NFL: α 60%MLB: α = 66%NBA, NHL: α = 100%
Rh home team gate• Rp = pooled gate from all other teams
• Impact of Revenue Sharing– Financial stability (early NFL struggled to maintain y ( y gg
league); "luxury tax" in MLB– Competitive balance– Shifts funds from teams that spend a lot on good
players to teams that do not; tends to depress what teams are WTP for players (“tax on quality”)
![Page 29: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Broadcast Revenue: RBroadcast Revenue: RB
• National revenue is shared equally• Local revenue is not shared equallyq y
– KC: A small market for MLB but not NFL– Green Bay would have disappeared
• Tradeoff: RB vs RG? blackouts
Wh t d t i b d t i ht t ?• What determines broadcast rights payments?– Demand by Advertisers
Super Bowl XLIII:– Super Bowl XLIII: • NBC received $206m for 69 spots ($3m per 30 seconds)
![Page 30: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Broadcast Money Trail
Sports Teams and Leagues
y
Sports Teams and Leagues
Programming Rights Fees $
Media Providers (Networks, Cable, Satellite)
Ad Slots Slot Fees $
Advertisers (Consumer Products Producers)
![Page 31: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Revenue from Broadcast Rights Agreementsg g
Sport Years Rights Total Fees Annual Average
NFL 2006-2011 ABC, FOX, CBS, ESPN
$22.2 billion $3.7 billion
NBA 2008-2015 ABC/ESPN, AOL $7.4 billion $930 millionTime Warner
MLB (1) 2007-2013 ESPN $2.4 billion $343 million
MLB (2) 2007 2013 FOX/TBS $3 billion $429 millionMLB (2) 2007-2013 FOX/TBS $3 billion $429 million
NASCAR 2001-2008 FOX/NBC, Turner $2.4 billion $400 million
PGA 2003-2006 CBS, NBC $850 million $212.5 million
NHL 2005-2008 Versus/NBC $207 million $70 million
Source: various sources
![Page 32: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Stadium Revenue: RS
• Concessions• Parkingg• Naming rights: pros; colleges; individuals• Luxury seats• Luxury seats
– don't count as gate, therefore, don't have to share
Example:• luxury suite rents for $500,000 per year• 20 seats20 seats• claim each seat is worth $50
team must share $3200 = 0.4 * 20 * $50 * 8 games
![Page 33: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Wh h t llWhy have we seen a move to small markets by NFL teams?
– Rams: LA St. Louis– Raiders: LA Oakland– Oilers: Houston Nashville– Browns: Cleveland Baltimore
Revenue Sharing is the key!Revenue Sharing is the key!
![Page 34: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Licensing Revenue: RLicensing Revenue: RL
• Generally shared with all teams• Cowboys broke ranks with NFL in 1995 byCowboys broke ranks with NFL in 1995 by
signing Pepsi for stadium sponsorship
![Page 35: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Franchise CostsFranchise Costs
TC = CP + CA + CT + CS
• Player Salaries
+ OC
• Player Salaries– Over 50% of team revenues– Deferred compensation
Bonuses– Bonuses– Workers’ comp– Pension contributions– Player Development
Opportunity Costs: Profit that could be earned in another city
– Player Development • MLB and NHL
• Administrative– Coaches and managementCoaches and management– Marketing
• Travel• StadiumStadium
![Page 36: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Average costs and revenues (in millions) across th j t i 2006the major sports in 2006
League Gate Revenue
Other Revenue
Total Revenue
Player Expense
Other Expense
Total Expense
Operating ProfitRevenue Revenue Revenue Expense Expense Expense Profit
NFL 44.59 159.75 204.34 125.47 61.11 186.58 17.76
NHL 34.10 47.10 81.20 44.17 33.85 78.02 3.18
NBA 39.23 79.87 119.10 68.77 40.58 109.35 9.75
MLB 61.03 109.33 170.37 93.30 60.55 153.55 16.52
![Page 37: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Accounting GamesAccounting Games• Book Profit and DepreciationBook Profit and Depreciation
Profit = TR TCCosts include interest expensesand depreciation of capitalProfit = TR – TC
Corporate ta es depend on book profit
and depreciation of capital
– Corporate taxes depend on book profit• Paying high administrative costs reduces book profit • Interest is tax deductible (dividends are not)• Interest is tax deductible (dividends are not)• Player contracts are treated as depreciable assets
– Bill Veeck– San Antonio Spurs example
![Page 38: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Table CSan Antonio Spurs Depreciation and Tax Savings 1993-4/1994-5
(All figures in $millions)(All figures in $millions)
1993-94 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95
Category w/o Roster DEP
w/Roster DEP
w/o Roster DEP
w/Roster DEP
(1) NOR 4 9 4 9 0 3 0 3(1) NOR 4.9 4.9 0.3 0.3(2) DEP 3.5 (3.5+10.7) 3.5 (3.5+10.7)
(3) NAD 1 4 -9 3 -3 2 -13 9(3) NAD 1.4 -9.3 -3.2 -13.9(4) Taxes .5 0 0 0(5) NADT .9 -9.3 -3.2 -13.9( )
Tax Savings 0 3.2 1.1 4.9
![Page 39: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Accounting GamesAccounting Games
• Vertical Integration– Media outlet buys sports teamy p
• AOL Time Warner Atlanta Braves• Tribune Company Chicago CubsTribune Company Chicago Cubs• Disney Anaheim Angels /Anaheim Ducks• FOX LA DodgersFOX LA Dodgers
– Double monopoly?
![Page 40: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Upstream Firm Downstream Firm p(Team) (Network)
PupMC
Pdown
D D
MC
DMR
DMR
Qup Qdown
• Vertically integrated firm sets transfer price to allocate profit across combined entityallocate profit across combined entity– Set low broadcast rights fee to reduce team profits in
order to plead poverty during lobbying for public p p y g y g psubsidy
![Page 41: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
League DecisionsLeague Decisions– Cincinnati Red Stockings (1869)
• “barnstorming”– National League (1876)g ( )
• $0.50 tickets• No Sunday gamesNo Sunday games• No beer
American Association (1882)American Association (1882)$0.25 tickets on Sunday with beer!
![Page 42: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
League DecisionsLeague Decisions• Setting the Rules
– # games, game format, equipment• Limiting Entry
Teams– Teams• Benefits:
– Entry feeMore re en e so rces– More revenue sources
• Costs: – Sharing of league revenues
Reduced geographical monopoly– Reduced geographical monopoly– Reduces threat of moving
– New leagues: ABA, WHA, AFL, USFLL id M k i• League-wide Marketing– Free-rider problem
• Competitive Balance and Revenue Sharing• Competitive Balance and Revenue Sharing
![Page 43: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
NFL Expansion FeesNFL Expansion FeesTeams Franchise Fee First SeasonHouston Texans $700 million 2002
Carolina Panthers and Jacksonville Jaguars $140 million 1995
Seattle Seahawks and Tampa Bay Bucs $16 million 1976Seattle Seahawks and Tampa Bay Bucs $16 million 1976
Cincinnati Bengals (AFL) $7.5-$8 million 1968
New Orleans Saints $8.5 million 1967
Atlanta Falcons $8.5 million 1966
Miami Dolphins (AFL) $7.5 million 1966
Minnesota Vikings $1 million 1961g $
Dallas Cowboys $1 million 1960
Original members of the AFL $25,000 1960
Phil d l hi E l d Pitt b h Pi t * $2 500 1933Philadelphia Eagles and Pittsburgh Pirates* $2,500 1933
New York Giants $500 1925
Original members of the NFL** $100^ 1920*Changed nickname to Steelers in 1940**NFL was known as the American Football Association its first two seasons.^According to accounts, this fee was never paid by the teams.
Source: http://www.profootballhof.com/history/release.jsp?release_id=1286
![Page 44: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
If a team always sells out its home games, economists would say it is very likely that:
a) A surplus existsb) There is excess supplyc) There is excess demandd) Prices are too high
![Page 45: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
If an industry is a monopoly, output is _____ and prices are th if it f tl titi_____ than if it were perfectly competitive.
a) Lower, lowerb) Higher, lowerc) Lower, higherd) Higher, higher
![Page 46: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
If demand for tickets to see the LA Lakers is inelastic,
a) Fans will respond to a price increase with a proportional decrease in quantity demanded.
b) fans will respond to a price increase with ab) fans will respond to a price increase with a less than proportional decrease in quantity demanded.
c) fans will respond to a price increase with an infinitely large decrease in quantityan infinitely large decrease in quantity demanded.
d) fans will respond to a price increase with a more than proportional decrease in quantity demandedquantity demanded.
![Page 47: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
If income increases and tickets to see a Notre Dame f tb ll l d th thfootball game are a normal good then the
a) demand for tickets will decrease. b) supply of tickets will increase. c) demand for tickets will increase. d) supply of tickets will decrease.
![Page 48: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The fact that attendance rises at baseball stadiums during “bobblehead” days suggestsduring bobblehead days suggests
a) baseball games and bobbleheads are complementscomplements.
b) baseball games and bobbleheads are substitutes.
c) baseball games and bobbleheads are normal goods.
d) No information about baseball games andd) No information about baseball games and bobbleheads can be determined from this fact.
![Page 49: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
A negative aspect of anti scalping laws isA negative aspect of anti-scalping laws is
a) they prevent sell-outs. b) they cause people to pay more than
they are willing to in order to get ticketsthey are willing to in order to get tickets. c) they prevent the market from matching
willing buyers and sellers. d) th h t ti k t id) they hurt ticket agencies.
![Page 50: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
If the Knicks sign LeBron James to a big contract they i ti k t i bmay raise ticket prices because
a) their average cost curve shifts up. b) their demand curve shifts right. c) their marginal cost curve shifts up. d) their fixed cost curve shifts up.
![Page 51: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
If a game is not sold out, then the marginal cost to a team of accommodating one additional fan isteam of accommodating one additional fan is
a) almost infinite.b) about equal to the team's payroll c) essentially zeroc) essentially zero. d) about half the cost of a ticket.
![Page 52: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
To determine the market demand for tickets to see th B t B i l h kthe Boston Bruins play hockey we
a) add the marginal revenue at each price. b) divide the revenue of the team by the
number of fans.c) add the price consumers are willing toc) add the price consumers are willing to
pay at each quantity. d) add the quantity demanded at each
iprice.
![Page 53: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
The league with the most equal split of gate i t b t th h d i iti t ireceipts between the home and visiting teams is
a) The NFLb) The NBA)c) Baseball’s National Leagued) The NHL)
![Page 54: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The "naming rights curse" refers to the fact thatThe naming rights curse refers to the fact that
a) teams that have sold their naming rights have performed poorly.
b) t ft i t littlb) teams often receive too little revenue for their naming rights.
c) cities generally do not receive any of ) g y ythe naming rights revenue.
d) firms that have bought naming rights have often run into financialhave often run into financial difficulties.
![Page 55: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Over the course of a single season, the largest ti f t t iproportion of team cost is
a) zero. b) fixed.)c) variable. d) shared by all teams in the ) y
league.
![Page 56: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
The ownership of professional teams by media tl toutlets
a) prevents cross subsidization. b) is known as horizontal integration. c) is known as vertical integration. d) is becoming less common.
![Page 57: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
The Dallas Cowboys are such a valuable franchise b thbecause they
a) can tap into both U.S. and Mexican media markets.
b) have a tradition of winning that attracts fans from all over.
c) have done an expert job of i th lmanaging the salary cap.
d) have so many luxury boxes.
![Page 58: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
By declaring Subchapter S status owners of y g pprofessional teams can
a) increase their revenue flow and hence h i fitheir profits.
b) reduce the Corporate Tax Rate that they must pay. p y
c) use depreciation to reduce their personal taxes.
d) d th i t t t th td) reduce the interest payments they must make to their creditors.
![Page 59: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Marketing for a league is a public good ifMarketing for a league is a public good if
a) all teams pay for the cost of advertising for small market teams.
b) ll t l h f thb) all teams pay an equal share of the cost of advertising campaigns.
c) all teams derive benefit from an )advertising campaign.
d) all teams pay some share of the cost of advertising campaignscost of advertising campaigns.
![Page 60: The Economics of Modern Professional Sports as Presented by Scott Corwon of IMPACTS](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022042613/546b1a9cb4af9f702c8b4a16/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)