The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

32
THE DYNAMICS OF PUBLIC POLICY: A SYSTEMS MODEL 1

description

Stages Stages of public policy problem identification and definition agenda setting policy formulation policy legitimation policy implementation policy change policy evaluation

Transcript of The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Page 1: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

THE DYNAMICS OF PUBLIC POLICY: A SYSTEMS MODEL

1

Page 2: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stages• Stages of public policy

• problem identification and definition • agenda setting• policy formulation• policy legitimation• policy implementation• policy change• policy evaluation

2

Page 3: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Policy Process ModelPolicy Cycle

3

Problem definition/Agenda setting

Policy formulation

Policy legitimation

Policy implementation

Policy change

Policy evaluation

feedback

Page 4: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stage One: Identifying Problems

• There are always a lot of problems and they can be defined in different ways.

• Relatively few identified problems receive attention

4

Page 5: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

A political problem involves• A perception that something is wrong

• A belief that the problem can be ameliorated by public action

5

Page 6: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Why Do Some Problems Receive Attention? • A. Problems-- that become an agenda item

• Issues that government officials and/or the public focus on (fuel economy, clean air, unemployment)

• Issues mandated by law and/or commonly monitored (annual reports to Congress, child vaccinations, education outcomes, international events)

• Focusing events: the attacks on 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina brought attention to America’s preparedness for disasters

6

Page 7: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Politics and Participants• B. Politics

• Problem becomes focus of attention because of a change in administration—Romney versus Obama

• C. Because of the participants: Important people or groups are interested in the problem

• president and staff• congressional leadership• media• powerful interest groups• judiciary

7

Page 8: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

8

Four types of Issue Agendas

Agendas can be classified in four groups…

periodically recurring issues

sporadically recurring issues

crisis-based issues

new or “chosen” issues

Page 9: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Agendas as Political Power• Establishing the agenda means control over policy

• Political power can be used to alter the agenda

• Political power can be used to keep issues off the agenda

9

Page 10: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Agenda Setting

10

Problem stream

Policy stream

Political stream

Opportunity for agenda items

Page 11: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Policy Formulation begins with Problem Definition

•Can the problem or problems be defined?• What is the major problem or problems that need to be solved?

• Is there agreement on the basic problem or problems?

•More often than not, agreement is lacking or disputed.

11

Page 12: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stage Two: Policy Formulation• Define policy alternatives that can be debated.

• Who’s involved? Very fragmented in American system. • Members of Congress• Executive/Bureaucracy• Government Staffs • Interest groups• Judiciary

12

Page 13: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Who designs or writes policies?• The public bureaucracy—government agencies

• Select committees

• Think tanks

• Interest groups—generally very important

• Members of Congress and their staffs

13

Page 14: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

How are Policy Options or Solutions vetted?

• Technical Feasibility/costs

• Consistency with community values

• Support from important groups

• Anticipation of future problems or constraints

• Debates between the political parties

14

Page 15: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Example: Welfare Reform Problems Identified and Debated

• Increases in the number of unemployed people on welfare• Increases in the number of children born out-of-wedlock• Increases in parental abandonment• Increase in welfare costs

15

Page 16: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model
Page 17: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Democratic Party Plan• Require work of able-bodied adults and make sure work

pays a decent wage• Improve child support enforcement• Set up programs to prevent unwanted pregnancies (sex

education)• Support work for adults with child care and health care

services• Create public service and subsidized jobs

17

Page 18: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Republican Plan• Cap welfare spending• Turn welfare over to the states• Set lifetime limits on how long healthy adults can

receive welfare• Allow states to use strong sanctions to force change in

habits• Deny assistance to teens who become pregnant• Eliminate aid to legal immigrants

18

Page 19: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Compromise: New Legislation Passed in 1996

• Caps spending on central welfare program--TANF• Turns welfare over to states, but sets guidelines• Requires supported work of healthy adults• Puts a lifetime limit on welfare enrollment • Requires both parents to accept responsibility for children• Funds abstinence sex education for teens• Denies welfare to most legal immigrants

• A compromise but one that gave the Republicans most of what they wanted.

19

Page 20: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stage Three: Policy Legitimation• Policy has a better chance of being implemented as

intended if it is considered to be legitimate

• It is legitimate if:

• Citizens agree that government action is required and appropriate—but there might be a lot of disagreement

20

Page 21: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stage Four: Policy Implementation• Activities that put policies into effect

• Passing the required laws

• Formulating rules and regulations

• Allocating a budget

• Setting deadlines

• Assigning enforcement or implementation authority

21

Page 22: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Implementation Often Involves Delegation

• To carry out the policy agencies may delegate power to other government entities or even private subcontractors.

22

Page 23: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Delegation of Authority Occurs when:

Government confers upon an administrative or private subcontractors rulemaking power that it could exercise itself.

23

Page 24: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Limits on Discretion

• Administrative Procedures passed into law limit the authority of implementing agencies

• Congress and the executive branch establish oversight procedures and requirements

• Example: The food stamp program in Texas

24

Page 25: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Presidential Oversight of Policy Implementation Includes

• Appointment Power• Budgetary Power• Reorganizations• Guidelines for Enforcement• Executive Orders• Required evaluations

25

Page 26: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Congressional Oversight of Implementation Includes

Committee Hearings• Budgetary Power• Investigations (General Accounting Office)• Informal (phone calls, letters, etc.)• Enactment of a statute• Deadlines

26

Page 27: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stage Five: Evaluation of Change

• Different types of changes • direct vs. indirect• short-term vs. long-term

• Evaluation puts information back into the policy process—this is called feedback.

• Normally a policy has to be in effect for some time (even years) before its impact can be measured.

27

Page 28: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Developing Evaluation Criteria:Some Examples

• Effectiveness, efficiency, fairness, political feasibility

• Are their unintended consequences

• Decide which criteria fit the problem(s)

28

Page 29: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Evaluation may include • Measurement of Change

• Listing of positive and negative changes

• Listing of changes that still need to be accomplished

• Cost-Benefit Analysis: How much has change cost?

• What is the ethical impact of the law?

29

Page 30: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Stage Six: Feedback• Information and data on impact of law or regulation is

communicated to government officials and public.

• Feedback plays a role in shaping amendments to exiting laws or the passage of new laws.

• This is the learning stage.

30

Page 31: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Incrementalism• Since most policy problems are addressed in incremental

fashion –addressing part of the problem but not all of it-

• The feedback loop often results in the process starting over, often building on the laws that have been implemented.

• Sometimes the feedback process results in rejecting the old approach in favor of a new direction.

31

Page 32: The Dynamics of Public Policy: A systems Model

Policy Process ModelPolicy Cycle

32

Problem definition/Agenda setting

Policy formulation

Policy legitimation

Policy implementation

Policy change

Policy evaluation

feedback