The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 [email protected].

13
The Doctor’s Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 [email protected]

Transcript of The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 [email protected].

Page 1: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

The Doctor’s Dilemma

ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009

[email protected]

Page 2: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

Three discussion areas (1) Context of the PhD in English -

a profession at the crossroads

(2) The Creative Writing PhD –

another crossroads

(3) ‘Why become a doctor of something

that can’t be fixed?’ – pedagogical

crossroads

Page 3: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

(1) a profession

at the

Crossroads

Page 4: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

Two major forces in the discipline, pulling in opposite directions

AHRC – rhetoric of ‘impact’,

‘dissemination’, ‘knowledge-

transfer’

RAE/REF – rhetoric of

‘excellences’ and ‘esteem’

RAEAHRC

Page 5: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

(2) The CW PhD

– another

crossroads

Page 6: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

Are we training

people to be

published authors

or

reflective writers?

WriterAuthor

Page 7: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

The ‘composite’ format of the CW PhD – weighting of the two components

Uni 1: 50,000 – 60,000 + 15,000 - 30,000 (4:1)

Uni 2: Up to 60,000 + 15,000 (4:1)

Uni 3: 100,000 total, 2/3 the work, 1/3 rest (2:1)

Uni 4: 40,000 + 40,000 (1: 1)

Page 8: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

The ‘composite’ format of the CW PhD – nature of the 2nd component

Uni. 1: ‘self-reflective and evaluative analysis’/or theoretical

Uni. 2: ‘extended critical essay’/’supporting and reflecting on the work’

Uni. 3: either on related genres/topics/themes, or reflective on the work, or ‘more experimental’, e.g. in ‘different voices’

Uni, 4: on ‘some aspect of the creative work’, such as historical/cultural material, or on evolution of poetic form. [this is the only one not using some form of the word ‘reflect’]

Page 9: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

PhD CW has wide variations in …

Length-ratio of the two components Ranges from 4:1 to 1:1

Nature of the 2nd component: These range in emphasis from ‘reflective’ to literary-historical, to

literary theoretical to ‘critical-creative’

Patterns of supervision Single supervisor or components separately supervised?

Patterns of work Do candidates write the novel first, then ‘reflect’, or do the two processes run simultaneously?

Overall aims To produce good writers or published writers? i.e. should we recognise that the PhD ‘novel’ isn’t a novel yet, just as the academic thesis isn’t a book yet?

Page 10: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

(3) Pedagogical

Crossroads

Page 11: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

Is there such a

thing as

(mono)disciplinarity?

English Arts & Hums

Page 12: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

Another

Pedagogical

Crossroads

‘One reads eagerly,

chapter to chapter,

waiting to see what

happens next’

(reviewer’s comment on an

academic biography)

The Uni. The World

Page 13: The Doctors Dilemma ESC at Birkbeck/ 3 April 2009 ptb@aber.ac.uk.

The End