The Disciplinary Board of the Sepreme Court of PA Office of Disciplinary Cousel commits fraud along...

4
Paul J. Killion Chief Disciplinary Counsel Paul J. Burgoyne Deputy Chief Disciplinary Counsel DISTRICT IV OFFICE Suite 1300 Frick Building 437 Crant Street Pittsburgh, PA'l 52'l 9-61 00 (412) s6s-3173 FAX (412) s65-7620 www. pad isc ip I i naryboard.org ($ront[:'#-' Bo<eo Supnrmr Counr or PrruNsyLVANrA OFFICE OF DISCIPTINARY COUNSET February 13, 2013 Disciplinary Counsel-in-Charge Angelea Allen Mitas Disciplinary Counsel Mark C. Weitzman Samuel F. Napoli Cory Johrl Cirelli David M.rLame Susan N. Dobbins William R. Friedman Terrell N. Patillo 108 Sutton Street Aliquippa, PA 15001 Re: Complaint Against Milton E. Raiford, Esquire File Reference #C4-13-742 Dear Mr. Patill-o: This is to acknowledge receipt of your complaint against Attorney Milton E. Raiford, which you recentl-y filed with this office. Our evaluation of the matter is now complete. Your complaint is that Mr. Raiford has improperly filed a divorce action against you on behalf of your wife, Kathryn J. Pati1lo, and makes false statements in that divorce complaint. Please be advised that before the Court in which suggest that you consult regard. For t.hat reason, closed the file. such matters are more properly brought the divorce action is pending. We with counsel of your choice in that we have dismj-ssed your complaint and In the er;ent that you pursue this issue before the Court in which your divorce matter is pending, and the Court finds that Mr. Raiford engaged in some form of improper conduct, please feel free to contact us. We will- then at that time determine whether we should reopen your complaJ-nt. Enclosed are the original documents you sent to this office with your complaint. Copies of pertinent rlocuments were made for our file. With few excepti-ons, the attorney disciplinary system 1s confidential and remains so unless and until formal- disciplinary charges are filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel against the

Transcript of The Disciplinary Board of the Sepreme Court of PA Office of Disciplinary Cousel commits fraud along...

Paul J. KillionChief Disciplinary Counsel

Paul J. BurgoyneDeputy Chief Disciplinary Counsel

DISTRICT IV OFFICESuite 1300Frick Building437 Crant StreetPittsburgh, PA'l 52'l 9-61 00(412) s6s-3173FAX (412) s65-7620www. pad isc ip I i naryboard.org

($ront[:'#-' Bo<eo

Supnrmr Counr or PrruNsyLVANrA

OFFICE OF DISCIPTINARY COUNSET

February 13, 2013

Disciplinary Counsel-in-ChargeAngelea Allen Mitas

Disciplinary Counsel

Mark C. WeitzmanSamuel F. NapoliCory Johrl CirelliDavid M.rLameSusan N. DobbinsWilliam R. Friedman

Terrell N. Patillo108 Sutton StreetAliquippa, PA 15001

Re: Complaint Against Milton E. Raiford, EsquireFile Reference #C4-13-742

Dear Mr. Patill-o:

This is to acknowledge receipt of your complaint againstAttorney Milton E. Raiford, which you recentl-y filed with thisoffice. Our evaluation of the matter is now complete.

Your complaint is that Mr. Raiford has improperly filed adivorce action against you on behalf of your wife, Kathryn J.Pati1lo, and makes false statements in that divorce complaint.

Please be advised thatbefore the Court in whichsuggest that you consultregard. For t.hat reason,closed the file.

such matters are more properly broughtthe divorce action is pending. We

with counsel of your choice in thatwe have dismj-ssed your complaint and

In the er;ent that you pursue this issue before the Court inwhich your divorce matter is pending, and the Court finds that Mr.Raiford engaged in some form of improper conduct, please feel freeto contact us. We will- then at that time determine whether weshould reopen your complaJ-nt.

Enclosed are the original documents you sent to this officewith your complaint. Copies of pertinent rlocuments were made forour file.

With few excepti-ons, the attorney disciplinary system 1sconfidential and remains so unless and until formal- disciplinarycharges are filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel against the

Terrel-1 N. PatilloPage TwoFebruary 13, 2OL3

respondent-attorney with the Disciplinary Board and the respondent-attorney has had the opportunlty to answer those charges.

We appreciate the interest and concern with the Iega1professi-on which you showed by bringing this matter to ourattention. Please be advised that the policy of the Office ofDisciplinary Counsel is to retain closed complaint files for onlytwo (2) years. Therefore, your file will be destroyed two (2)years from the date of this letter.

SFN/mb

Enclosures

Samuel F. NapoliDisciplinary Co

::

I.

tI

I

ht6 gi,reu ff l-eqJeoJ tlqo"* A*r*,,,n/fo Sh, il+vue((

lfi"+fi, 74,:s pneeuc/, Cze J,lr;/,' f

.',..1

,q"{<

customer's order no. phone'^" 4fsf t 3

i ! i i",,;sold by cash I charge I check I

c.o.d. I on acct. E #_shipping information

giEy

2 ai;-, .'

,, 1,"{'ii(

,

4 1r*r/,)zh5

5 eq0n2{40/ 2{ 6e57

B ft/a.abvul9 oft0 t-Wz'B*Fe4efil

t2 At3

.,, Pt4 J)

@.*tu,s. keepth@ Dcssosuviro_ro

keep this slip fior reference

mrur!m

I]-ITEolfl

rnEEEEl-r|ruru

TTEEr-

Postage

Certilied F€e

Return Receipl Fee(Endorsement Flequired)

Fleslricted Delivery Fea(Endorsement Required)

Total Postage & Fees