The Dipmeter Advisor* A dipmeter interpretation workstation€¦ ·  · 2014-09-12technology to...

18
Geol. Soc. Malaysia Bulletin 21. December 1987; pp. 37 - 54. The Dipmeter Advisor* A dipmeter interpretation workstation GORDY G. SHANOR Schlumberger Overseas S.A. Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia Abstract: The Dipmeter Advisor is a knowledge-base system. linked to a computer work-station. designed to aid in the interpretation of dipmeter results through interaction between the interpreter and the "expert" system. The system utilizes dipmeter results, other wireline log data, computer processed results such as LITHO"', and user-input local geological knowledge as the framework for the interpretation. A work session proceeds through a number of phases, which leads to flI'St a structural, then a stratigraphic interpretation of the well data. Conclusions made by the Dipmeter Advisor can be accepted, modified, or rejected by the interpreter at any stage of the work session. The user may also make his own conclusions and comments, which are stored as part of the final interpretation and become part of an updated knowledge-base for input to further field studies. INTRODUCTION The Dipmeter Advisor system is the result of a five-year effort to apply expert system technology to the problem of dipmeter interpretation. The project began at Schlumberger Doll Research in 1981. In 1982, the Dipmeter Advisor program was rewritten on the Xerox 1100 (Dolphin), and the Dolphin based version of the program was transferred to the engineering centers for testing and evaluation of applications in the field. From August 1983 to October 1985, the system has undergone further modifications as final preparation and support for its release to select field test sites throughout the world. Three sites in Asia currently have the system: Kuala LUmpur, Tokyo and Jakarta. For a more detailed historical review of the Dipmeter Advisor system, refer to the case studies by Smith and Baker (1983), and Langley (1985) THE INTERPRETATION PROBLEM Although dipmeter logs have been in existence for many years, the geological interpre- tation of processed dipmeter results is rarely straight-forward, and is often the responsibility of geologists who are not extensively trained. in dipmeter processing and interpretation technique. The Dipmeter Advisor system is an attempt at addressing this problem by applying a systematic set of guidelines and rules for dipmeter interpretation, in combination with additional knowledge from other open-hole logs and the interpreter. The development of this systematic approach is based on techniques used by dipmeter interpretation experts. Presented at GSM Petroleum Geology Seminar 1985 "'Trademark of Scblumberger

Transcript of The Dipmeter Advisor* A dipmeter interpretation workstation€¦ ·  · 2014-09-12technology to...

Geol. Soc. Malaysia Bulletin 21. December 1987; pp. 37 - 54.

The Dipmeter Advisor* A dipmeter interpretation workstation

GORDY G. SHANOR

Schlumberger Overseas S.A. Kuala Lumpur, West Malaysia

Abstract: The Dipmeter Advisor is a knowledge-base system. linked to a computer work-station. designed to aid in the interpretation of dipmeter results through interaction between the interpreter and the "expert" system.

The system utilizes dipmeter results, other wireline log data, computer processed results such as LITHO"', and user-input local geological knowledge as the framework for the interpretation. A work session proceeds through a number of phases, which leads to flI'St a structural, then a stratigraphic interpretation of the well data.

Conclusions made by the Dipmeter Advisor can be accepted, modified, or rejected by the interpreter at any stage of the work session. The user may also make his own conclusions and comments, which are stored as part of the final interpretation and become part of an updated knowledge-base for input to further field studies.

INTRODUCTION

The Dipmeter Advisor system is the result of a five-year effort to apply expert system technology to the problem of dipmeter interpretation. The project began at Schlumberger Doll Research in 1981. In 1982, the Dipmeter Advisor program was rewritten on the Xerox 1100 (Dolphin), and the Dolphin based version of the program was transferred to the engineering centers for testing and evaluation of applications in the field. From August 1983 to October 1985, the system has undergone further modifications as final preparation and support for its release to select field test sites throughout the world. Three sites in Asia currently have the system: Kuala LUmpur, Tokyo and Jakarta. For a more detailed historical review of the Dipmeter Advisor system, refer to the case studies by Smith and Baker (1983), and Langley (1985)

THE INTERPRETATION PROBLEM

Although dipmeter logs have been in existence for many years, the geological interpre­tation of processed dipmeter results is rarely straight-forward, and is often the responsibility of geologists who are not extensively trained. in dipmeter processing and interpretation technique. The Dipmeter Advisor system is an attempt at addressing this problem by applying a systematic set of guidelines and rules for dipmeter interpretation, in combination with additional knowledge from other open-hole logs and the interpreter. The development of this systematic approach is based on techniques used by dipmeter interpretation experts.

Presented at GSM Petroleum Geology Seminar 1985 "'Trademark of Scblumberger

38 GORDY G. SHANOR

The most common use of dipmeter results is to define the structural dip occuring in the strata cut by the well bore, and to recognize significant changes in structural dip which may represent folds, faults, unconformities, or major depositional trends. Figure 1 illustrates the lower portion of the dipmeter sonde and its micro-resistivity measurement sensors, and Figure 2 graphically illustrates the computed dips on an "arrow" plot.

In the interpretation process, most interpreters group sets of tadpoles together into patterns, with respect to lithology changes and dip variation. Figure 3 illustrates the most commonly encountered patterns and their generalized interpretation. Four distinct types of patterns are observed Delfiner et af. (1984):

Green Patterns: Dip magnitude and azimuth are constant with changing depth, often representing structural dip.

Red Patterns

Blue Patterns

Dip magnitude increases with depth, with constant azimuth, often representing deposition on a sloping surface ("slope pattern") or drag associated with faulting.

Dip magnitude decreases with depth, with constant azimuth, often representing foreset deposition by river or ocean currents ("current pattern").

Yellow Patterns: Scattered dip magnitupe and azimuth, often representing high energy deposition or post-depositional deformation.

By recognizing dipmeter patterns corresponding to different lithologies, the Dipmeter Advisor, and the interpreter, first determine structural dip zones, and zones having large­scale structural variations (red and blue patterns). This interpretation leads to an under­standing of the post-depositional tectonic effects present in the well. In order to evaluate paleo-current directions of reservoir sands and their geometries, it is often necessary to remove the effect of post-depositional uplift by removing the structural dip component. After structural dip removal, current (blue) patterns within the sands should be a good indication of paleo-current directions. Slope (red) patterns in shales above the sands may help confirm their "bar" nature, while slope patterns within the sands may indicate they are more "channel­like". The Dipmeter Advisor takes into account the experience gained from expert interpreters and applies the interpretation rules systematically on the dipmeter results.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM

The Dipmeter Advisor system attempts to emulate human expert performance in dipmeter interpretation. It utilizes dipmeter patterns together with local geological knowledge and other open-Qole measurements.

The program is written in INTERLISP-D, and now operates on an upgraded Xerox 1109 Scientific Information Processor (Dandelion). The dipmeter results and open-hole logs are processed in a main-frame computer and are retrieved to the Dandelion.

The system is made up of four components:

(i) Graphical User Inteiface: a menu-driven user interface allowing interactive com­munication between the user and the system, and providing displays of the data in various formats.

} ..... RAY COM""'"

ELECTRONICS ACQUISITION AND TRANSMISSION OF DATA FROM

~ = ~ AND rucTROO~

// ~ ELECTRICAL CURRENT / ....-- l--...J-----"''''_c_- FLEX JOINT \ EMITTED BY SONDE "'" \ AND ELECTRODES " 3 AXIS"'\ \ ! ( / ACCELEROMETER

ilNCLlNOMETER AZIMUTH. DEVIATION

\\ 'lfM ) I /

\ "- / /~~NDE SECTION / 4 PADS. 2 DIP CURVES

/ PER PAD. PADS 1 AND 2 ALSO

4 1 HAVE SPEED ELECTRODE

/-10 ELECTRODES TOTAL

CORRELATION FINDS RELATIVE SHIFTS BETWEEN CURRENT CURVES

ELECTRODE CURRENT MEASURED - DIP CURVES

Fig. I. Schematic sketch of the Stratigraphic High Resolution Oipmeter Tool (SHOT).

40 GORDY G. SHANOR

DIPS

N

W -+ E

5

O· 10· 20· 30·

cross-section of the formation dlpmeter arrow plot

Fig. 2. Dipmeter arrow plot (Tadpole Plot) made from the computer processing of the dipmeter raw data (From R. Nurmi, 1984). .

(ii ) Feature Detection: a set offeature detection algorithms that examine both dipmeter and other log data to detect tadpole patterns and lithologic zones. Each feature is stored as a "token", which is a small table specifying its top, bottom and its main characteristics.

(iii) Production Rules: sets of rules partitioned according to their functions, such as structural or stratigraphical. These rules recognize tokens, interprete their occur­rence, and generate conclusions in the form of "result tokens".

A rule is composed of an "if' part and a "then" part. The "if' part is a series of clauses that must be true before the "then" part, a series of assertions, is applied. A sample of rules is shown in Figure 4.

THE DIPMETER ADVISOR

Adjacent tadpol.s form dip groups which are the building

blocks of m.ga-patt.rns. Th. dips forming such groups

are derlv.d from the int.rnal structure of s.dlm.nt layers

deposlt.d under uniform conditions.

Th. groups are :

1) ~~ (color.d r.d) R.sult of deposition on a sloping

~ surface or post-depositional

deformation.

2) , (color.d blu.) Result of current bedding or

,-'weathering.

3) __ (color.d y.llow) R.sult of depoaltlon In a high

.n.rgy .nvlron .... nt or poet­

d.posltlonal deformatlan.

4) _ (colored green) Result of horizontal depoeltlon In a ... _ low en.rgy environment or paranel

crose-b.ddlng.

Fig. 3. Dipmeter Patterns and their generalized interpretation.

41

42 GORDY G. SHANOR

IF: -there exists a delta-domillated,colltillental-shelf marille .one, alld

-there exists a salld .one illtersectillg tbe marille 'Olle, alld

-tbere exists a blue pattern witbiD tbe iDtersection

THEN:

-assert a distributary fall .olle

top - top of blue patterll

bottom - bottom of blue patterll

Bow - •• imutb of blue pattern

Fig. 4. An example of a rule.

(iv) Inference Engine: applies the rules in a forward-chained manner, utilizing the most restrictive ones first, in order to draw conclusions based on the rules in the know ledge base and input data.

The last two components comprise the Artificial Intelligence part of the system, and represent its first application to well-logging interpretation.

DIPMETER INTERPRETATION

The task of dipmeter interpretation is divided into twelve succesive phases (Figure 5). The user can start with any phase, though certain phases require results from other phases. At the beginning of each phase, the user examines parameter values in order to choose appropriate values best suited the area studied and the type of dipmeter processing being analyzed. Following each phase, the user can examine, delete, or modify conclusions reached by the System. Ifthe user decides to go back to a former phase, it can be rerun several times if desired (Figure 6).

• THE DIPMETER ADVISOR 43

I Validity Analysis I I

.---------11 Lithology Analysis I

1-------1~ LITHO Interface I

1-------11 Miscellaneous Features I

t----Il Structural Dip Analysis I I

l Structural Dip Removal }I--------, I L..-_-II Preliminary Structural Analysis I I

I Structural Patterns I· I

I Final Structural Analysis I I

I Depos i tional Environment Analys is 11----' I

I Sed i men tary Pat terns I I

I Sedimentary Analysis I Fig. 5. Dipmeter Advisor interpretation phases.

I VAUOITY-ANALYSIS-O 120

I lITHOLOGY - ANALYSIS - O 125

... ... .. Oipmcter Advisor ('1.1) ..... (C) Schlumberger 1984

CLU1 . 0A

STRUCTURAL-DIP-ANAL YSIS - 0252 STRUCTURAL - DIP-ANAL YSIS-O 130 I

USER-PHASE-0254 I

STRUCTURAL-DIP -REMOVAL - 0 2 6 8 I

PRELIMINARY -STRUCTURAL-ANAL YSIS - 0 26 5 I

STRUCTURAl-PA TTERNS - 0 26 8 I

USER-PHASE-0270

~~~~~~~~~~~~US~ER~-P~H~A----~SE~-~O~2~1~5~~fl~N~A~l-STRUCTURAL-ANAl YSIS - 0271

10584 10629 . 6 10633 10706.3 10711 10723.0 10726.3 10783.3 10808.2 10791 .3 10808 . e

rOGessing Setup Window

WEI L PLO T OR .CRC-O 16 2

o 200

~~~;! : ~ ~~~;;:~L-----r--n~"f=F~~T=~~Uij~~~~wm~~~=F1Fr-~Rf~Hi~~HRHH~=FT=nF====rr-r--~r-~~ 11251. 3 11254.6 11263 . B 11266.3 11286.3 11289 . S 11313. B 11316 . 3 11339.6 1134 2. 9

Fig. 6. An example uf r<:rullni llg f ina l struct ural analysis.

Cl o a. '< Cl

THE DIPMETER ADVISOR 45

Here is a brief description of each phase, after INITIAL EXAMINATION, in which the user views the available data and selects logs for display:

VALIDITY ANALYSIS: The System identifies lithology using the open-hole logs such as gamma ray, SP, resistivity, etc.

MISCELLANEOUS FEATURES: The System detects features such as fining-upward and coarsening-upward sequences.

LITHO INTERFACE: The System accepts lithological information obtained from LITHO* (Gilreath, 1976) program which defines bed boundaries based on open hole log values and an electro-facies database.

STRUCTURAL DIP ANALYSIS: The System identifies green patterns, merges these patterns to determine zones of constant structural dip.

STRUCTURAL DIP REMOVAL: The System removes structural dip for structural and stratigraphic analysis.

PRELIMINARY STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: The user examines information about structural setting for the area.

STRUCTURAL PA TIERNS : The System examines the dipmeter data for red and blue patterns to detect structural features.

FINALSTRUCTURALANALYSIS: The System applies a set of rules and information from previous phases to identify structural features such as faults.

DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS: The System applies a set of rules based on user-specified conclusions about the depositional environment.

SEDIMENTARY PA TIERNS : The System examines the dipmeter data for red, blue, green pattern in intervals where the depositional environment has been identified.

SEDIMENTARY ANALYSIS: The System applies a set of rules to draw conclusions about sedimentary features such as channels, fans, and bars.

EXAMPLE

Figure 7 shows a sample Xerox 1109 screen following a structural dip analysis phase. On the extreme left are command menus, panel types, token summaries, and token types which are used by the interpreter throughout a work session. Track 1 displays the gamma ray

. and calipers with depths. Tracks 2 and 3 display the CLUSTER * results from a High Resolution Dipmeter Tool. Track 2 is the "active" track in which structural dip removals, pattern plots and result tokens are displayed. Track 4 displays the borehole deviation. The small box indicates that portion of the entire well expanded in Tracks 1-4, and the well plot (extreme right) displays dip magnitude and gamma ray for the entire well. The overall display format is flexible and variable, depending on the data set available and the interpreter's preference. .

Figure 8 shows the user setting sand parameters for the lithology analysis phase. At the beginning of each phase, parameters must be examined and edited to match with the local geological condition.

In Figure 9, structural dip intervals defined by the System are shown. The System first detects green patterns, then groups shorter green patterns into longer constant dip zones

* Trademark of Schlurnberger

Pr(J 1Il I W ll1ol fJI'j

validity mega·green

green red blue

borehole land ·ma~~

mi~c · fee.turco

struct-d lp: 19254.6 19914 . 6 struct-d ip: 11158 . 0 12546 .3 struct-d lP : 12669 . 6 12671.3 sUUCt-dlP: 12793. 0 13264.6 mega-Oreen: 19264 . 6 10399.6 lIeoa-oreen : 19419 . 6 10559 . 6 .eoa-or-een ; 19603. e 10751 . 3 lIeoa-or-een: 19831 .3 10914 . 6 meoa-oreen : 11156 . e 11341.3 mega-gr-een: 11391 .3 11626.3 ",ega-orcen: 11626.0 11726.3 mega-green: 11736 . 0 11803 . 9 meoa -gr een: 11813 . 9 12289 . 6 lIega-oreen: 12291.3 12546 . 3 l!iega-green : 12576.3 12641.3 lIIeoa-green: 12793.0 1321 9 . 6

H1254 . 6 19264 . 6 10268 . 0 10271. 3 10348 .0 10353.0 10364.6 10369.6 10373.0 10379.6 10391. 3 10399 . 6 10419 .6 19426 .3

.' • ~. ': ,.' , •. <

.,.;., .. '. ,PF.E::EIITATIOIl8),P9 T1 · [OIP [OIP·f,HO ·::U M 01:''::,

I

TRA CK 1 OR,CRC-0162 50 150

DIP MAGNITUOE - AZIIIIUTH PLOT DlP-MAO-014 f

o 10 20 30 4 0 50 6 (]7 0890

~ .. • Oiprneter Advisor (4 . f) ......

W Ch1ulllbe r QCr 1984

LU1 , OA

alP MAGN I TUDE-AZIMUTH PLOT SHO M-AZ DIP-MAG-Of4f lLE-MAu-O '

a 10 ZO 3 0 40 50 6070890 0 .020.0

Fig. 7. A data display all the Xerox I 109 sc reen.

~ 0\

o o ..., a.

'-<

o en ::r C> :J o ...,

"1.' .. ··· _____________ _

,~·F.E: Eln ... TI':;,11 ·)"P·)·T 1·(.IJ:··[' I~-- E· Hr.,: ')1 .. 1·(01 ;-.=..

124761 1<1 I I l'

VALIDITY -ANAL YSIS-O 120

OIP /IIAGNITUOE-AZltWTH PLOT OIP-MAO-O 141

o 10 20 30 40 50 6070690

* * * * Oipmeter Advisor (4 . 1) * * * * C? ScWUlIIbsrcer 1984 _" __ u l

{KLJVAX} LU1.0A

DIP MAGNITUDE -AZ IMUTH PLOT SHO III-AZ 01P-MAO-0141 )LE-MAO-D ·

o 10 2030 40 50 6(]70890 0.020.0

PREO I CA LOW-CUT H r -CUTO

10251.3

ILESS-TH I N/A 1 110 .13 I 13300.0

~SAND

I---....jl L1THOLOOY-ANALYSIS-PARAMETER ~~:~~REDjCA 7E

SHALE·PREDICA TE

11626.0

g~~~ : ~ I '''44i4tm1i§4'. . .f' .: 11736 . 0 I r~

-Qr~:~~4;~~~!~!. ~;ITHOLO?Y-ANA;:;519 I 11""~0l""m""'''''11l """"ROl""""'''''''''11l I. ,_ c: . ~~ 10268.13 113271 .3 103'8.0 10353.0 1036'.6 10369.6 10373. e 10379.6 10391.3 113399 . 6 10419.6 10'26.3

126001 111 1 I (I I

126251 I~ I If"I 11

128501 II I I~ l'

Fig. 8. Para mete r selection for the Lithology Anal ys is phase.

-l :r: m

o "" s: m -l m ;0

» o < tn o ;0

.j:>. -..J

mega· green green ,.d blue

borehole land · ma~~

ml~c,'eature~ structural ·dlp

tectonic · environment structural · interruptlon~ ~tructural .l nterpretatlon

lithology ~equence

depositlonal.environment

113251 . 3 11153.8 11153 . 8 12763.1 12791 . 3 13308 . e 10254 . 6 10914 . B 10273 . 8 18742.9 10267 . 9 10868.0 10267.9 10888.0 10254 . B 19914.6 11148 , 9 11149,6 11153 . 9 11969,6 11153.9 12551.3 11979.6 11981.3 11153 . 8 12561.3 12569.6 12671. 3 12676.3 12768.0 12791. 3 13264.6

en: 12791 . 3 13264,6 10264.6 10264.6 19267.9 19271 ,3 19273.9 19274,6 10286.3 10288.0 10324.6 10326 .3 10329 . . 3

Fig. 9.

c onstant (tk259 tk260 tk474

12791 31 13380 B 14 , 59 96 . 99 13264.63 constant

. <OlP AOV,

(tk414 tk416 tk416 tk417 tk418 tk419 tk424 tk478

Structura l Dip Zones defined by the Dipmcler Advisor.

o o a.. '< o

THE DIPMETER ADVISOR 49

("mega-green") if dip magnitude and azimuth variation are within user-defined tolerances. Structural dip is then defined by examining mega-green patterns and their differences. The structural dip zones are plotted in the 'well plot' track on the extreme right. An option to display only high quality tadpoles has been employed.

Figure 10 shows a projection plot and azimuth histogram, after structural dip removal, which are examples of the user-interface function. By using these plots, the user can easily examine structural dips defined by the system, plot palaeocurrent directions of blue patterns within sands, drag patterns near faults, etc. In the example, the plots highlight the rollover (red) pattern above the growth fault.

The result after structural dip removal is shown in Track 2 of Figure 11. The removal of the structural tilt from the dipmeter data is often critical to the analysis of the sedimentary and stratigraphic structure. However, the removal of structural dip also makes more apparent the smaller scale structural events, such as rollover or drag near fault zones. Therefore, structural and sedimentary analyses are generally carried out after structural dip removal. This interactive dip removal capability greatly speeds up the ~ipmeter interpretation.

Figure 12 displays one of the structural anomolies detected by the Advisor, after dip removal. In this example, a growth fault is picked at 12,742 ft., at the base of the mega-red pattern. The strike, dip and minimum throw (based on missing section between structural dip zones) are indicated in the normal fault token. The red pattern is plotted on the screen and can be plotted on the final hardcopy prints if desired.

In Figure 13, a distributary channel is identified by the System. Information about channel geometry and paleocurrent direction is also provided. An accurate determination of reservoir geometry using these results is critical in the initial reservoir development. In addition, accurate definition of reservoir geometry is equally important in later stages of reservoir analysis, such as water flooding and enhanced oil recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The Dipmeter Advisor System has been developed into a strong interpretation tool for the exploration and production geologist. The graphics capability of the System enables the interpreter to view the data in a variety of ways, quickly generate polar plots and azimuth frequency diagrams in the zones of interest, try different values of structural dip removal, confirm tectonic features and their orientation, and ultimately determine palaeo-depositional trends within a specific palaeo-environmental model. The System's inter-activity makes it very flexible as an interpretation tool and as a training device. Development of the System is a continuing effort, and as more of the Systems are installed in Southeast Asia, the interpretation expertise in the various geological provinces will steadily increase.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Bangladesh Oil, Gas & Minerals Corporation for releasing dipmeter and log data used in this paper. A special thanks goes to K. Saitoh of Nippon Schlumberger K.K. (Tokyo) for his assistance in this project.

• . t" tier·PhI II 'S4' az-hut : 12900 . 8 13209.8 ,u-h,st : 122913.013200 . 8 uncnfrlllty: 10914.611163.0 nrMl-rlt: 10944 ,6 10944.6 Upl1ft : 11153 . 0 11153.0

l-flt : 127422 12742 .2 10269.6 10p3 . 0 10401.3 10404 , 6 10506 . 310511 . 3 10563.8 10569 . 6 10571. 3 1057'.6 10579.6 10584.6 10629. 6 10633.0 10706 . 3 10711.3 10 723.0 10726.3

Fig.IO. Project Plot and Azi muth Histogram.

53'

WELL PLOT 00.000 - 0162 o 200 i a " Zid i

Vl o

C) o ..... a.

'-< C)

~ ~

~

mega·green green ,ed blue

borehole land·ma~~

mi~c ·teature:l ~tructural.dip

tectonic·envi ronment structural. interruptions structural .interpretation

lithology ~equence

depo~itional·enllj ronment rshale

10251 3 11153 13 11153 0 12763 1 12791 3 1331i10 0 10254 6 10914 6 10273 0 10742 9 10267 9 113858 0 10267 9 10888 0 10254 6 10914 6 11148 0 11149 6 111 53 0 11969 6 11153 0 12551 3 11979.6 11981 3 11153 . 0 12551 3 12569.6 12671 3 12676,3 12758 0 1 2791. 3 13264,6 12791,3 13264.6

10264.6 10264 , 6 10267,9 10271 . 3 10273.0 10274 . 6 10286 .3 10288 . 0 113324 . 6 10326.3 113329 . 6 10331 . 3

1257'1--It-+-HH'

1 285 1°f-~f-t~~_ I1 Z "'50Ir41tHtHW,H~##rlH~~~

~ I I

..... * Dlpmeter Advisor ( 4.1 ) (C) Sch lumberger 1984

CLU1. OA

DIP MAGNITUDE-AZIMUTH PLOT BHO M- AZ OIP- MAO -01 4 1 )lE- MAQ-O'

o 10 20 30 40 50 6(]70890 0 .020.0

Fig. I I. Display afte r StrucllI ral Dip Removal phase.

WELL PLOT

» o < Vi o ;0

mega·green green ",d

blue borehole

l and·me..~~ ml~c ·teature~ ~tructural.dlp

tectonlc·envlronment structural.interruptions ~tructural .i nterpretatton

lithology ~equence

depo~itional . environment rshale

.....;;i~~l 19914.6 11153. e

It: 19944.6 19944.6 11153 . 9 11153 . 8

It : 12742.212742.2 10269.6 10273 . B 10401. 3 10404 . 6 10506 .3 10511 .3 10563. e 10569.6 19571..3 19574 .6 19579.6 105B4. 6 10629 .6 10633 . 0 18786 .3 10711.3 19723. e 10726.3 10791. 3 10B0B . 0 11041.3 11844 . 6 11234 .6 11239.6 11251. 3 11254 . 6 11263 . 9 11266 .3 11266.3 11269 . 6 1131 3. 0 11316 .3 11339 .6 . 11342 9 11456.13 11461. 3 1154 2.9 11546 .3

Fig. 12.

* * * * Oipmetar Advisor (4.1) * * * * (C) Sch 1umberger 1984

CLU1. OA

St ructural Interp retation by the Dipl11e ter Adv i,or.

WELL PLOT OR.CRC-0162 o 200

o o a. '< o C/l ::r po ::l o ..,

I validity

mega·green green

, ed blue

borehole land·ma~~

mi~c.teature:J structural.dip

tectonic -environment structure..I .interruptions structural.lnterpretatlon

lithology

19783 .3 198138 ,2 113914.6 11153 . 13

-flt : 10944 . 619944.6 ft: 11153.13 11153.0 -f1t: 12742.2 12742.2 10269.6 1B273. 0 1134131.3 1B404. 6 10586.3 10511. 3 10563.0 10569.6 U571 . 3 1B674. 6 18579.6 19584.6 10629.6 10633.0 18786.3 18711. 3 113723. B U726. 3 19783.3 U8BS . 2 1B791 . 3 18888.8 11041.3 11044.6 11234.6 11239.6 11251. 3 11254.6 11263 , 13 11266 , 3 11286.3 11289.6 11313. B 11316.3 11339.6 11342.9

0780I-H~I"l-+1' O"78'01-J.H*I+fl~

079 l,n79(

OR. ,nR,n

nRU I)

--

• • " • Oipmeter 'dvisor (4 . 1) """. ~ C) Sch 1 umberQer 1984

CLU1. DA

DIP MAG NITUDE-AZ IMUTH PLOT BHO M-AZ DIP-MAQ-0141 JLE-MAG-O '

o 10 20 30 40 50 6070a90 00200 I" "LU>! tK-j."l.. .8 ~ r-

ItttflttttttlllttHttttttHtt1ltt-1H-i f--

HtfttHf-t-H io--

H-ffltttttttttttHfttHtHtttIlt-+t-i io--

IttttmtmllttHtttttttlltltt-lH-i io--

lM+ttttttttttHfttHttllHilt-+t-i io--

WEll PLOT OR.CRC-0 182 o 200

110400 ~

IUSTER-3. ::

1124 0! ~,

11260!

c·:··~

Fig. 13. Scd ill1cnlary Ana lys is by Dipll1clcr Atlvi,ur.

54 GORDY G. SHANOR

REFERENCES

DELANER P. ,PEYREr O. and SERRA 0., 1984. Automatic determination of Lithology from Well Logs. 59th Ann. Techn. Conf. SPE of AIME, Houston, TX, paper SPE 13290, 1984.

GILREATH, J. A., 1976. The Dipmeter, Schlumberger Publication, 1976. LANGLEY R. L., 1985. A Case Study of the Dipmeter Advisor Development. In T. Bernold and G. Albers (eds.),

Artificial Intelligence : Towards Practical Application, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland), 1985. .

NURMI, R., 1984. Geological Evaluation of High Resolution Dipmeter Data. SPWLA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 10-13, 1984, Paper Y.

SMITH, R. G. and BAKER J. D., 1983. The Dipmeter Advisor System : A Case Study in Commercial Expert System Development. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, DCAl, August 1983, pp. 122-129.

Manuscript received 24 May 1986