The Demography of Hampshire’s New...The Demography of Hampshire’s New Housing Developments . 1...
Transcript of The Demography of Hampshire’s New...The Demography of Hampshire’s New Housing Developments . 1...
0
Published by Research and Intelligence September 2014
www.hants.gov.uk
Hampshire County Council
The Demography of Hampshire’s New
Housing Developments
1
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2
Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 2
Limitations and caveats .................................................................................................................... 2
Output areas consisting mostly of new development ..................................................................... 3
Summary Characteristics of New Development ............................................................................. 10
Population Pyramids ...................................................................................................................... 11
Area Summaries ............................................................................................................................. 15
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 44
Appendix ........................................................................................................................................ 46
2
Hampshire’s New Housing Developments
2011 Census Output Area Analysis
Introduction
This demographic analysis focuses on output areas (OAs) where new housing development was built
between 2001 and 2011. The aim of the report is to aid understanding of the make up of new
housing development communities.
Methodology
The methodology was to:
Utilise a shapefile of all housing sites with completions between April 2001 and March 2011
(using Hampshire’s Land Availability Monitoring System (LAMS))
Determine whether the OAs containing these sites consisted mostly of new development
built or inhabited since the 2001 Census, by using LAMS, address data, council tax records
and aerial photography.
Record the development that the OA consisted of (LAMS site code, name and year of start
and completion).
Analyse the OAs that meet this criteria against a number of 2011 Census topics.
Limitations and caveats
In order to meet the criteria the area must have seen the number of dwellings grow considerably or
a complete change in content (regeneration). This means that the sites included are mostly green
field, regeneration or brownfield sites and the method does not readily capture infill, garden
grabbing or small sites. These limitations should be kept in mind when analysing the data.
3
Output areas consisting mostly of new development
All local authorities within Hampshire had at least five output areas (OAs) that met the criteria.
Basingstoke and Deane had the highest number of OAs with 55, whilst Havant and the New Forest
only had 5 (Table 1). The analysis of Census topics will be more meaningful and reliable for those
districts with a larger sample size, than for those with only a handful of new development OAs.
Table 1: Number of output areas meeting new development criteria
LA Name Number of Output Areas
Portsmouth 12
Southampton 19
Basingstoke and Deane 55
East Hampshire 6
Eastleigh 18
Fareham 7
Gosport 22
Hart 18
Havant 5
New Forest 5
Rushmoor 14
Test Valley 12
Winchester 11
Hampshire County Council Area 172
Hampshire including Portsmouth and Southampton 203
Table 2 shows the developments that these OAs cover. It should be noted that the OA does not
necessarily cover the whole development, and may only represent a small part of the whole site.
There are 97 sites in total and 62 of these are made up of only one OA. Figure 1 shows the broad
location of the new development OAs across Hampshire.
Table 2: Development sites included in new development output areas
Area Site Name Number of Output Areas
Portsmouth Victoria Road North and Cumberland Business Park 1
Portsmouth Historic Ships' Car Park 3
Portsmouth Land Adjacent to Roebuck House 1
Portsmouth University Business School 1
Portsmouth Vulcan Building Gunwharf 6
4
Southampton Shirley Garage Services and Pennant Information Services 1
Southampton 57/58 High Street 1
Southampton Andersons Road/Deanery Annexe Site 5
Southampton French Quarter Castle Way 1
Southampton Clausentum Quay Hawkeswood Road 1
Southampton County Cricket Ground 1
Southampton Custom House Orchard Place 2
Southampton Dock House Canute Road 1
Southampton Former Wickes Store 1
Southampton Land at St Mary St/Kingsway North 1
Southampton Land Bounded by Ocean Way and the Boatyard Site 1
Southampton Nazareth House 1
Southampton Orions Point 1
Southampton Telephone House 1
Basingstoke and Deane The Old Down Kempshott Lane 2
Basingstoke and Deane Adjacent to Forge Cottage Sherfield Road 1
Basingstoke and Deane Aldermaston Junction Priestley Road 1
Basingstoke and Deane Alencon House 1
Basingstoke and Deane Beech Road 2
Basingstoke and Deane Crown Heights 2
Basingstoke and Deane Down West Yard 3
Basingstoke and Deane Churchill Way West 2
Basingstoke and Deane John Hunt School 1
Basingstoke and Deane Kempshott Park 11
Basingstoke and Deane Merton Rise 2
Basingstoke and Deane North Binfields 3
Basingstoke and Deane North Hampshire Hospital Land 1
Basingstoke and Deane Old Kempshott Lane 3
Basingstoke and Deane Park Prewett 8
Basingstoke and Deane Popley Fields 6
Basingstoke and Deane Skippetts House 1
Basingstoke and Deane Taylor's Farm and Sherfield Place 5
East Hampshire Land rear of Winchester Road 1
East Hampshire Borough Grove Grange Road 1
East Hampshire Former OSU Midhurst Road 1
East Hampshire Land at Chase Road 1
East Hampshire Lord Mayor Treloar Hospital Chawton 1
East Hampshire Ramshill 1
Eastleigh Site of Golden Hind PH Twyford Road 1
Eastleigh Dowds Farm 4
Eastleigh Ensign Way & Hamble Lane Junction 1
5
Eastleigh Land at Bodmin Road 1
Eastleigh Land North Botleigh Grange 2
Eastleigh Leigh House Hospital 1
Eastleigh Pirelli Site 6
Eastleigh Land South of South Street 1
Eastleigh The Gardens Estate and 229-245 Desborough Road 1
Fareham Land to Rear of Hunts Pond Road 1
Fareham Land at the Rear of Working Mens Club 1
Fareham Dairy Cottage and Cartshed Cold East Way 1
Fareham Dickens Drive Land at North Whiteley 2
Fareham East of Lower Duncan Road 1
Fareham Land at "Marlborough Gardens" Whiteley Lane 1
Gosport Daedalus 1
Gosport Howe Road Land 1
Gosport Land East of Cherque Farm 8
Gosport Priddy's Hard 7
Gosport St Georges Barracks North 2
Gosport Schat - Harding Site Mumby Road 1
Gosport St Georges Barracks South 2
Hart Elvetham Heath 15
Hart Holt Lane Land 3
Havant Homewell, East Street, West Street and the Pallant 1
Havant Park Parade and Greywell Centre 1
Havant Proctor & Gamble 2
Havant Ramsdale Playing Fields Woolston Road 1
New Forest Britannia Gate Shore Road 1
New Forest Hazel Farm 1
New Forest Mulberry Estate 1
New Forest RNAD Site, Magazine Lane 1
New Forest Vernall's Farm 1
Rushmoor 250 Concept House and Rear of 294 Farnborough Road 1
Rushmoor Alma House Crimea Road and Copthall House 1
Rushmoor Salamanca Park 2
Rushmoor Boots Depot Site 4
Rushmoor Concept House Farnborough Road 1
Rushmoor Farnborough Business Park Land at O'Gorman Avenue 1
Rushmoor Guillemont Fields 1
Rushmoor Ladywood Avenue 1
Rushmoor Land off Whetstone Road and NAAFI Guillemont Fields 1
Rushmoor Whetstone Road and Brownsover Road 1
Test Valley South of Knights 2
6
Test Valley East Anton 3
Test Valley Grove Place 1
Test Valley West of Floral Way 3
Test Valley Willow Way Estate 3
Winchester Whiteley Farm 4
Winchester Harvest Home PH 1
Winchester Knowle Hospital 3
Winchester Staple Gardens 1
Winchester Old Park Farm 1
Winchester Winton House 1
Figure 1: Location of new development output areas
7
Figure 2 shows some of Gosport’s new development OAs (in purple) and an example development
(Land East of Cherque Farm, shown by the purple hatching). This new development has led to the
creation of eight new OAs that are entirely made up of the development. At the north of the
development, the new housing is combined with an existing OA and so these new development
residents are not included in this analysis.
Figure 2 also shows a contrast to these new development OAs. Areas where a number of properties
were vacant at the time of the 2011 Census will have had their OAs merged to form larger
geographic areas and populations. In Gosport, the Rowner renewal project (shown in blue hatching)
was being redeveloped at the time of the 2011 Census and so the four 2001 OAs covering this area
were merged into two for 2011 (2011 OA boundaries shown in blue).
8
Figure 2: Example of new development and merged output areas in Gosport
9
Comparison of the total number of dwellings in sites included within each new development OA with
the total number of net dwellings (gains minus losses) built over the decade (gained from LAMS)
reveal how much of each areas’ development is included in this report. However, it is an over
estimate, as not all of some sites are included in the selected OAs (Table 3).
For Hampshire overall (including Portsmouth and Southampton) 41.5% of all dwellings built over the
decade are included in this report. For Hampshire County (excluding Portsmouth and Southampton),
the figure is 46.0%. There are four districts where more than half of all dwellings built over the
decade are included here (Southampton, Basingstoke and Deane, Eastleigh, Portsmouth). However,
there are three districts where less than a fifth of all dwellings built are included (Fareham, Havant
and New Forest).
Table 3: Percentage of development over the decade included in new development analysis
Area
Dwellings within New Development Output
Areas All Net Gains within
the Area
Percentage of All Development Over the
Decade Included in New Development Output Areas
Basingstoke and Deane 6,295 9,401 66.96%
East Hampshire 1029 2,240 45.94%
Eastleigh 2,455 3,705 66.26%
Fareham 895 4,865 18.40%
Gosport 2,640 9,054 29.16%
Hart 2,579 6,643 38.82%
Havant 576 3,917 14.71%
New Forest 690 3,678 18.76%
Portsmouth 1808 3,487 51.85%
Rushmoor 1623 4,800 33.81%
Southampton 2599 3,250 79.97%
Test Valley 1376 3,406 40.40%
Winchester 1496 4,380 34.16%
Hampshire County Council Area 21,654 47,129 45.95%
Hampshire including Portsmouth and Southampton 26,061 62,826 41.48%
10
Ethnically diverse
Shared ownership
households
Cohabiting
households
Overcrowded
households
More single (never
married) residents
More flats
More densely populated Younger residents
More commute by train
Population
Summary Characteristics of New Development
Households
11
Hampshire (including Portsmouth and Southampton)
Hampshire County (excluding Portsmouth and Southampton) Portsmouth
Population Pyramids
The population pyramids for the new development output areas
(OAs) (shown in pink for females and blue for males) compared
to each area as a whole (shown with a black line) are presented
below.
It is clear that residents of new development OAs tend to be
younger than the general population, with peaks in the young
adult and young child populations.
New Development Males
New Development Females
All Males
All Females
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
12
Southampton Basingstoke and Deane
East Hampshire Eastleigh
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
13
Fareham Gosport
Hart Havant
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4
10 ‒ 14
20 ‒ 24
30 ‒ 34
40 ‒ 44
50 ‒ 54
60 ‒ 64
70 ‒ 74
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
14
New Forest Rushmoor
Test Valley Winchester
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15 10 5 0 5 10 15
0 ‒ 4 5 ‒ 9
10 ‒ 14 15 ‒ 19
20 ‒ 24 25 ‒ 29 30 ‒ 34 35 ‒ 39 40 ‒ 44 45 ‒ 49 50 ‒ 54 55 ‒ 59 60 ‒ 64 65 ‒ 69 70 ‒ 74 75 ‒ 79
80 and over
15
Area Summaries
The pages below present summaries of the 2011 Census demographic characteristics of new
development output areas (OAs) for Hampshire including and excluding Portsmouth and
Southampton and at district, borough and unitary level. The data summarised below can be seen in
full within the charts in the appendix.
3.6% of Hampshire’s population live in the 203 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(63,240 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. The vast
majority of these people live in households. 89.7% of new development OAs are in urban cities and
towns.
More flats
44.4% of new development accommodation is flats, compared to 21.5% for Hampshire as a whole.
Smaller properties
25.3% of new development households only have 1-3 rooms, in comparison to 12.9% for Hampshire overall.
More overcrowded
15.2% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are fewer rooms than required for the number of people living in the household and thus it is overcrowded. This compares with the Hampshire average of only 7.1%.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban cities and towns is much larger than for Hampshire as a whole, with 32.8 people per hectare compared to 20.6. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 17.8% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 27.9% for Hampshire overall.
More likely to be private rented or under shared ownership
Over a quarter (25.9%) of new development households are privately rented, above the Hampshire average of 15.6%. A much larger percentage of new development households are under shared ownership (part owned and part rented) than the Hampshire average, with 6.2% compared to only 0.9%.
More likely to cohabit
17.1% of new development households contain cohabiting couples, compared to 9.3% of all households in Hampshire.
Hampshire (including Portsmouth and Southampton)
Households
16
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 10 years younger than for
Hampshire as a whole (30 years, compared to 40 years). 39.4% of household reference persons
are aged under 35, compared to only 16.9% in Hampshire overall.
Young population
16,860 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 38.7% of these are aged 0-4 years.
More ethnically diverse
81.5% of new development residents are White British, compared to 89.0% for
Hampshire overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all
other ethnicities, including 6.7% Asian and 6.2% White Other, compared to
Hampshire as a whole (3.8% and 4.0% respectively).
More likely to catch the train to work
6.4% of new development residents catch a train to work, compared to 4.1%
overall.
Population
17
4.2% of Hampshire County’s population live in the 172 output areas (OAs) containing new
development (55,110 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new
development. The vast majority of these people live in households.
More urban areas
87.9% of new development OAs are in urban cities and towns, compared to 77.9% overall.
More flats
36.3% of new development accommodation is flats, compared to 16.1% for the county as a whole.
More overcrowded
11.2% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are fewer rooms than required for the number of people living in the household and thus it is overcrowded. This compares with the county average of only 5.3%.
Smaller properties
20.4% of households have 1-3 rooms, compared to 10.4% in the county overall. More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban cities and towns is much higher than Hampshire County as a whole, with 29.4 people per hectare compared to 16.5. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 20.7% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 34.3% for the county overall.
More likely to be private rented or under shared ownership
Over a fifth (22.2%) of new development households are privately rented, above the county average of 12.5%. A much larger percentage of new development households are under shared ownership (part owned and part rented) than the county average, with 6.0% compared to only 0.9%.
More likely to cohabit
17.3% of new development households contain cohabiting couples, compared to 9.5% of all households in Hampshire County.
Hampshire County (excluding Portsmouth and Southampton)
Households
18
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 12 years younger than for the county as a whole (30 years, compared to 42 years). 35.9% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to only 13.6% in the county overall.
Young population
15,730 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 38.4% of these are aged 0-4 years. More ethnically diverse
84.8% of new development residents are White British, compared to 91.8% for Hampshire County overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 5.7% Asian and 5.1% White Other, compared to the county average (2.7% and 3.2% respectively).
More likely to catch the train to work
6.5% of new development residents catch a train to work, compared to 4.3% overall.
Population
19
Only 1.3% of Portsmouth’s population live in the 12 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(2,670 people). The vast majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. All of
these people live in households.
More household spaces without usual residents
12.6% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 3.6% for the city as a whole.
Mainly flats
96.2% of accommodation in new development areas is flats, compared to 35.3% for the city’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households and living alone
New development households are smaller with 1.59 people on average compared to 2.34 for Portsmouth overall. This is linked to the high proportion of one person households (44.0% of all new development households, compared to 32.1% of all households).
Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms
The majority (64.4%) of households only have 1-3 rooms, compared to only 17.6% in the unitary overall. Over a third (35.2%) are studios or have only 1 bedroom.
More overcrowded
41.2% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are fewer rooms than required for the number of people living in the household and thus it is overcrowded. This compares with the unitary average of only 10.9%.
More densely populated
The population density of new developments in Portsmouth is substantially higher than any other area and for the city as a whole, with 133.9 people per hectare compared to 50.7. Showing that new developments consist of highly concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 0.5% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 4.1% for the city overall.
More likely to be rented or under shared ownership
22.1% of new development households are social rented, above the unitary average of 18.3%. Over a third (38.0%) are privately rented, above the Portsmouth average of 24.7%. A much larger percentage of new development households are under shared ownership than the unitary average, with 10.1% compared to only 1.0%.
Households
Portsmouth
20
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 6 years younger than for Portsmouth as a whole (28 years, compared to 34 years). The majority (57.0%) of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to a quarter (25.0%) overall.
Young population
380 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, The majority (60.1%) of these are aged 0-4 years.
More males
New development areas contain more males than females, with 56.3% of the population male, compared to 50.3% for the city in total.
More likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the city overall.
Much more ethnically diverse
Only 60.3% of new development residents are White British, compared to 84.0% for the city overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 11.6% Asian and 9.9% White Other, compared to the city as a whole (6.1% and 4.3% respectively).
More likely to walk to work
Over a fifth (22.8%) of new development residents commute to work on foot, compared to 16.9% across the unitary as a whole. This is linked to the 41.6% of households that do not have a car (compared to 33.4% in Portsmouth as a whole).
Population
Sites Victoria Road North and Cumberland Business Park
Historic Ships' Car Park
Land Adjacent to Roebuck House
University Business School
Vulcan Building Gunwharf
21
2.3% of Southampton’s population live in the 19 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(5,460 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast
majority of these people live in households.
Mainly flats
84.2% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 40.0% for the city’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households
New development households are smaller with 1.89 people on average compared to 2.33 for Southampton overall. This is linked to the high proportion of one person households (42.4% of all new development households, compared to 33.8% of all households).
More overcrowded
30.5% of new development households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding. The average for the city as a whole is only 13.6%.
Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms
46.5% of new development properties have 1-3 rooms, compared to only 22.9% in the unitary overall. Almost a third (31.9%) are studios or only have 1 bedroom.
More densely populated
The population density of new developments in Southampton is substantially higher than all other areas excluding Portsmouth and for the city as a whole, with 94.1 people per hectare compared to 47.5. Showing that new developments consist of highly concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 2.3% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 13.2% for the city overall.
Majority of households are private rented or under shared ownership
Over half (52.1%) of all new development households are private rented, compared to a quarter (24.9%) across the city. 5.5% of new households are under shared ownership; this is well above the average of only 1.0% for the unitary.
More cohabiting couple households
17.1% of new development households are cohabiting couple households, above the figure of 11.0% for the unitary as a whole.
Southampton
Households
22
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 7 years younger than for Southampton as a whole (25 years, compared to 32 years). 60.5% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 28.2% overall.
Young population
750 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, over a third (34.2%) of these are aged 0-4 years.
More likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the city overall.
Much more ethnically diverse
Only half (58.9%) of new development residents are White British, compared to 77.7% for the city overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 15.4% White Other and 14.2% Asian, compared to the city as a whole (8.3% and 8.0% respectively).
More likely to walk to work
Nearly a third (30.4%) of new development residents commute to work on foot, much higher than the unitary average of only 16.5%. This is linked to the 36.8% of households that do not have a car (compared to 29.5% in Southampton as a whole).
Sites Shirley Garage Services and
Pennant Information Services
57/58 High Street
Andersons Road/Deanery Annexe
Site
French Quarter Castle Way
Clausentum Quay Hawkeswood
Road
County Cricket Ground
Custom House Orchard Place
Dock House Canute Road
Former Wickes Store
Land at St Mary St/Kingsway North
Land Bounded by Ocean Way and
the Boatyard Site
Nazareth House
Orions Point
Telephone House
Population
23
9.3% of Basingstoke and Deane’s population live in the 55 output areas (OAs) containing new
development (15,660 people). The vast majority of these people live in OAs made up of entirely new
development. The vast majority live in households.
More urban areas
The majority (94.5%) of new development has taken place in OAs now defined as urban.
More flats
36.2% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 14.9% for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households and living alone
New development households are smaller than the borough average with 2.30 people per household, compared to 2.40 for the borough overall.
Smaller properties
25.1% of new properties only have 1-3 rooms, compared to 11.3% overall. More overcrowded
14.7% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding, compared to only 5.5% across Basingstoke and Deane as a whole.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban areas is double that of Basingstoke and Deane’s urban areas as a whole, with 44.6 people per hectare compared to 18.8. Showing that these new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 19.2% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 30.8% for the borough overall.
More likely to own via a mortgage or a loan
Only 8.0% of new development households are owned outright compared to 28.2% across the borough as a whole. A further 46.5% are owned via a mortgage or a loan, much higher than the borough average of 39.6%.
More likely to cohabit
18.7% of new development households contain cohabiting couples, compared to only 10.7% across the borough.
Basingstoke and Deane
Households
24
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 9 years younger than for Basingstoke and Deane as a whole (30 years, compared to 39 years). 42.3% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 17.3% overall.
Young population
3,240 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas. 42.2% of this population are aged 0-4 years.
More ethnically diverse
78.5% of new development residents are White British, compared to 88.2% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 9.4% Asian and 6.7% White Other, compared to the borough as a whole (4.0% and 4.7% respectively).
More commute by train
A larger proportion of new development residents travel to work by train (7.7%) compared to 5.3% across the borough.
Sites
The Old Down Kempshott Lane
Adjacent to Forge Cottage Sherfield Road
Aldermaston Junction Priestley Road
Alencon House
Beech Road
Crown Heights
Down West Yard
Churchill Way West
John Hunt School
Kempshott Park
Merton Rise
North Binfields
North Hampshire
Hospital Land
Old Kempshott Lane
Park Prewett
Popley Fields
Skippetts House
Taylor's Farm and Sherfield Place
Population
25
Only 1.9% of East Hampshire’s population live in the 6 output areas (OAs) containing new
development (2,170 people). The vast majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new
development. All of these people live in households.
More flats
27.3% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 14.4% for the district’s accommodation as a whole.
Larger households
New development households are larger than the district average with 2.49 people per household, compared to 2.40 for the district overall.
Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms
A quarter (25.6%) of new development properties have 7 or more rooms, compared to 37.3% across the whole district. 13.2% are studios or have only one bedroom, compared to 9.2% overall.
Less Spacious
The majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (66.1%), however this is below the figure for the district as a whole (81.1%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in the urban areas is three times that of East Hampshire’s urban areas as a whole, with 30.9 people per hectare compared to 9.1. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 24.3% of new accommodation is detached housing, compared to 42.5% for the district overall.
More likely to be social rented or under shared ownership
31.9% of new development households are social rented compared to only 12.0% across the district. 5.8% of new development households are under shared ownership, compared to 0.9% overall.
More likely to be cohabiting couples or lone parents
13.8% of new development households contain cohabiting couples compared to only 8.5% across East Hampshire. A further 13.4% are lone parent households, above the district average of 7.9%.
East Hampshire
Households
26
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 13 years younger than for East Hampshire as a whole (31 years, compared to 44 years). A quarter (24.8%) of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to 10.5% overall.
Young population
710 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas. 38.3% are aged 5-11 years. More females
52.6% of the new development population is female, compared to 51.4% for the district overall.
More likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the district overall.
More ethnically diverse
91.1% of new development residents are White British, compared to 93.0% for East Hampshire overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy many other ethnicities, including 4.3% White Other and 2.5% Asian, compared to East Hampshire as a whole (3.5% and 1.6% respectively).
More commute by train, fewer work from home
6.7% of people living in new developments commute to work by train, compared to 5.3% across the whole district. 6.1% work mainly from home, compared to 8.6% overall.
Population
Sites Land rear of Winchester Road
Borough Grove Grange Road
Former OSU Midhurst Road
Land at Chase Road
Lord Mayor Treloar Hospital Chawton
Ramshill
27
4.3% of Eastleigh’s population live in the 18 output areas (OAs) containing new development (5,400
people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. The vast majority
of these people live in households.
More flats
Almost half (48.4%) of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 16.2% for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households
New development households are slightly smaller than the borough average with 2.32 people per household, compared to 2.38 for the borough overall.
More overcrowded
12.1% of new development households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding, compared to 5.0% across the borough.
Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms
22.3% of new development properties have 1-3 rooms, compared to 10.2% overall. 13.2% are studios or have only one bedroom, compared to 9.2% for the borough as a whole.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban areas is almost three times that of Eastleigh’s urban areas as a whole, with 54.4 people per hectare compared to 18.6. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Just 9.8% of new accommodation is detached properties, compared to 33.5% for the borough overall.
More private rented, social rented and shared ownership
Over a quarter of new development properties are private rented (25.4%) and social rented (25.4%), compared to the borough as a whole (12.3% for both rental categories). Shared ownership is also more common in new development areas, with 8.5% of households under this tenure, compared to 1.1% overall.
More cohabiting couples and lone parents
More than a fifth (22.4%) of new development households contain cohabiting couples compared to only 10.4% across the borough as a whole. This is the highest new development cohabiting couple figure seen across all boroughs. 16.0% of households contain lone parents, compared to 9.0% overall.
Eastleigh
Households
28
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 13 years younger than for Eastleigh as a whole (28 years, compared to 41 years). 46.9% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to only 15.5% in Eastleigh as a whole.
Young population
1,590 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 45.2% of these are aged 0-4 years.
More likely to be single or divorced
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new
development than the borough overall. Those aged 35-49 are also more likely to be divorced in
new development areas.
More ethnically diverse
83.4 % of new development residents are White British, compared to 91.8% for Eastleigh overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 7.1% Asian and 4.3% White Other, compared to Eastleigh as a whole (3.0% and 2.9% respectively).
More likely to commute by train or on foot
7.3% of new development residents travel to work by train, across the borough this stands at only 3.9%. A further 10.7% walk to work, compared to 7.5% for Eastleigh as a whole.
Population
Sites Site of Golden Hind PH Twyford Road
Dowds Farm
Ensign Way & Hamble Lane Junction
Land at Bodmin Road
Land North Botleigh Grange
Leigh House Hospital
Pirelli Site
Land South of South Street
The Gardens Estate and 229-245 Desborough Road
29
2.5% of Fareham’s population live in the 7 output areas (OAs) containing new development (2,780
people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast majority of
these people live in households.
More household spaces without usual residents
13.7% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 2.9% for the borough as a whole.
More flats
29.6% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 12.8% for the borough’s accommodation overall.
Smaller households
New development households are smaller with 2.16 people on average compared to 2.36 for Fareham overall.
Less Spacious
The majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (72.2%), however this is below the figure for the borough as a whole (83.8%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.
Similar population density
The population density of new developments in urban areas of Fareham is 17.2 people per hectare, slightly below the figure for Fareham’s urban areas overall (18.1 people per hectare).
More social rented and under shared ownership
18.1% of households are social rented in new development areas compared to 8.1% overall. A further 4.8% are under shared ownership, compared to 0.6% across the borough.
More cohabiting couples and lone parents
16.0% of new development households are occupied by cohabiting couples, compared to 9.0% across Fareham as a whole. A further 13.0% contain lone parents, above the 8.1% average for the borough.
More car ownership
92.4% of households own at least one car, compared to 86.6% in the whole borough.
Fareham
Households
30
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 11 years younger than for Fareham as a whole (33 years, compared to 44 years). 29.7% of household reference persons are aged under 25 in new developments, compared to 11.3% overall.
Young population
780 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 72.4% of these are under 12 years of age.
More likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new development than the borough overall.
More ethnically diverse
93.1% of new development residents are White British, compared to 94.7% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 2.4% White Other and 1.9% Asian, compared to the borough as a whole (2.1% and 1.5% respectively).
More likely to drive to work
75.6% of new development residents drive to work, compared to 70.9% across the borough as a whole.
Population
Sites Land to Rear of Hunts Pond Road
Land at the Rear of Working Mens Club
Dairy Cottage and Cartshed Cold East Way
Dickens Drive Land at North Whiteley
East of Lower Duncan Road
Land at "Marlborough Gardens" Whiteley Lane
31
8.4% of Gosport’s population live in the 22 output areas (OAs) containing new development (6,920
people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. All of these people
live in households.
Homes without usual residents
8.4% of household spaces in new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 3.5% for the borough as a whole.
More flats
40.0% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 24.0% for the borough’s accommodation on average.
Smaller households
New development households are slightly smaller than the borough average with 2.27 people per household, compared to 2.31.
Smaller and larger properties
22.8% of households only have 1-3 rooms in new development areas, compared to 14.1% overall. However, 28.0% have 7 or more rooms, compared to 19.7% in the borough as a whole.
More overcrowded
12.6% of new development households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning that there are too few rooms for the number of people in the household and thus overcrowding, compared to only 6.2% across the borough as a whole.
Less densely populated
Population density of new developments is lower than that of Gosport as a whole, with 21.0 people per hectare compared to 32.6. Showing that new developments consist of less concentrated housing (24.1% of the accommodation is detached, compared to 13.2% for the borough as a whole).
Many private rented and under shared ownership
26.0% of new development households are private rented compared to only 16.3% across the borough as a whole. 4.5% of new development households are under shared ownership, compared to 1.1% overall.
More likely to be cohabiting couples
14.9% of households contain cohabiting couples, in comparison to 10.5% across the borough.
More car ownership
87.3% of households own at least one car, compared to 77.1% in the whole borough.
Gosport
Households
32
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 7 years younger than for Gosport as a whole (33 years, compared to 40 years). 27.7% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 17.5% overall.
Young population
1,950 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, almost a third (32.6%) of these are aged 0-4 years.
More likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 are more likely to be single in new development than the borough overall.
More ethnically diverse
92.3% of new development residents are White British, compared to 94.4% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy many other ethnicities, including 3.0% White Other and 1.8% Asian, compared to the borough as a whole (2.0% and 1.3% respectively).
More likely to drive to work
65.5% of new development residents drive to work, much higher than the 59.5% experienced across the borough.
Population
Sites Daedalus
Howe Road Land
Land East of Cherque Farm
Priddy's Hard
St Georges Barracks North
Schat - Harding Site Mumby Road
St Georges Barracks South
33
6.7% of Hart’s population live in the 18 output areas (OAs) containing new development (6,080
people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of entirely new development. All of these people
live in households.
More urban areas
The majority (83.3%) of new development has taken place in OAs now defined as urban.
Larger households
New development households are larger than the district average with 2.78 people per household, compared to 2.52.
Slightly less spacious
The vast majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (82.1%) which is the highest figure across all districts. However this is below the figure for the district as a whole (84.6%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban areas is more than double that of Hart’s urban areas as a whole, with 29.7 people per hectare compared to 13.6. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 15.2% of new accommodation is flats, compared to 11.1% for the district as a whole.
More private rented and shared ownership households
17.0% of new development households are private rented, compared to only 12.1% across the district and a further 7.8% of new development households are under shared ownership, much higher than the district figure of 1.1%.
Less likely to live alone, more likely to cohabit
15.3% of new development households are one person, compared to a much higher district average of 22.4%. A further 16.2% are cohabiting couple households, well above the average across the district of only 9.1%.
Hart
Households
34
Younger
Median age of the population living in new developments is 8 years younger than for Hart as a whole (33 years, compared to 41 years). 22.5% of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new development areas, higher than the figure for Hart overall (11.5%).
Young population
2,000 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 39.4% of these are aged 5-11 years.
More ethnically diverse
82.9% of new development residents are White British, compared to 90.7% for the district overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 6.7% White Other and 7.0% Asian, compared to the district as a whole (4.2% and 2.7% respectively).
More likely to commute by train and less likely to walk to work
11.7% of new development residents travel to work by train, above the district average of 7.2%. 3.9% of new development residents walk to work, which is lower than the average of 7.4%.
Population
Sites Elvetham Heath
Holt Lane Land
35
Only 1.9% of Havant’s population live in the 5 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(2,260 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast
majority of these people live in households.
Mainly flats
54.8% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 19.1% for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households
New development households are smaller than the borough average with 2.14 people per household, compared to 2.33.
Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms
29.8% of new development households have 1-3 rooms, the highest percentage in any Hampshire County borough. This compares to 11.4% across the borough overall. 18.3% of new development households have no or only 1 bedroom, compared to 10.9% for Havant overall.
More overcrowded
17.2% of all new development households in the borough have an occupancy rating of -1 or less, meaning the household has fewer rooms than required for the number of residents. This is much higher than the borough average of only 6.5%.
Less densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban areas of Havant is slightly lower than for Havant as a whole, with 20.6 people per hectare compared to 24.6.
More private rented and shared ownership households
26.1% of new development households are private rented, compared to only 9.9% across the borough and a further 4.0% of new development households are under shared ownership, much higher than the borough figure of 0.5%.
More to likely to cohabit or be lone parent households
16.7% of new development households are cohabiting couple households in comparison to only 9.7% across the borough. Almost a fifth (19.5%) of new development households are lone parent households, compared to 11.0% on average.
Lower car ownership
Almost a third (32.4%) of new development households do not own a car, the highest of any Hampshire County borough, compared to 20.7% in the whole borough.
Havant
Households
36
Much Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 15 years younger than for
Havant as a whole (29 years, compared to 44 years). This is the largest age difference of any
borough. 37.9% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to 13.2% in
Havant overall.
Young population
600 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 40.4% of these are aged 0-4 years.
More likely to be single or divorced
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new
development than the borough overall. Those aged 35-49 are also more likely to be divorced in
new development areas.
More ethnically diverse
93.1% of new development residents are White British, compared to 95.2% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy most other ethnicities, including 3.1% White Other and 1.9% Asian, compared to the borough as a whole (1.9% and 1.2% respectively).
More likely to be a car passenger, walk, or go by bus
9.0% of new development residents commute to work as a passenger in a car
compared to only 6.3% across the borough as a whole. A further 10.9% walk,
above the borough average of 8.0%. Fewer drive their own car to work with 58.3%
compared to 68.5%.
Population
Sites Homewell, East Street, West Street and the Pallant
Park Parade and Greywell Centre
Proctor & Gamble
Ramsdale Playing Fields Woolston Road
37
Only 1.1% of New Forest’s population live in the 5 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(1,910 people). The vast majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. All of
these people live in households.
More flats
35.4% of new development accommodation is flats, compared to 13.9% for the district as a whole.
Larger households
New development households are larger than the district average with 2.46 people per household, compared to 2.26.
Smaller properties
16.2% of new development households have 1-3 rooms, compared to 9.0% for the district overall.
Less spacious
The vast majority of new development households have one or more rooms than they require (65.6%), however this is below the figure for the district as a whole (82.1%), indicating that new development households are slightly less spacious.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban areas is over three times that of New Forest urban areas as a whole, with 41.8 people per hectare compared to 11.3. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 18.7% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 45.3% for the district overall.
More likely to be private or social rented
Almost a third (30.3%) of new development households are private rented, above the 12.1% district average. A further 16.6% are social rented, compared to 11.0% overall.
More to likely to cohabit or be lone parent households
14.1% of new development households are cohabiting couple households in comparison to only 8.1% across the borough. 13.3% of new development households are lone parent households, compared to 8.1% across the borough.
New Forest
Households
38
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 17 years younger than for New Forest as a whole (30 years, compared to 47 years). This is the largest difference of any district. Over a third (34.0%) of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to only 10.0% in New Forest as a whole.
Young population
580 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 37.4% of these are aged 5-11 years. More ethnically diverse
86.2% of new development residents are White British, compared to 94.9% for the district overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy all other ethnicities, including 5.2% Black and 3.6% White Other, compared to the district as a whole (0.3% and 2.7% respectively).
More likely to commute by car
73.0% of new development residents drive to work; this is above the district average of 69.4%.
Population
Sites Britannia Gate Shore Road
Hazel Farm
Mulberry Estate
RNAD Site, Magazine Lane
Vernall's Farm
39
4.6% of Rushmoor’s population live in the 14 output areas (OAs) containing new development (4,270
people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The vast majority of
these people live in households.
Mainly flats
Half (50.9%) of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to a quarter (25.6%) for the borough’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households
New development households are slightly smaller than the borough average with 2.40 people per household, compared to 2.53.
Smaller properties
28.2% of new development households have 1-3 rooms, compared to 14.7% for the borough overall.
More overcrowded
16.4% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less indicating that there are too few rooms for the number of people living in that household, this is compared to the borough average of only 10.1%.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments is more than twice that of Rushmoor as a whole, with 61.8 people per hectare compared to 24.4. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. Only 7.0% of new accommodation is detached, compared to 16.8% for the borough overall.
More private and social rented or under shared ownership
A quarter (25.0%) of new development households are private rented, 21.5% are social rented and 10.7% are under shared ownership (the highest shared ownership figure in any borough). This compares to borough wide figures of 17.6%, 16.3% and 1.8% respectively.
More likely to cohabit
17.1% of new development households are cohabiting couple households, above the borough average of only 11.1%.
Rushmoor
Households
40
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 8 years younger than for Rushmoor as a whole (28 years, compared to 36 years). 44.6% of household reference persons are aged under 35, compared to 20.0% in Rushmoor as a whole.
Young population
1,280 people aged 0-19 years live in new development areas, 38.5% of these are aged 0-4 years. More likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single in new
development than the borough overall.
More Ethnically Diverse
78.3% of new development residents are White British, compared to 80.5% for the borough overall. Only 8.9% of new development residents are Asian, down from the 10.4% observed across the borough as a whole.
More likely to catch the train to work
8.6% of new development residents catch the train to work in comparison to 6.8% across the borough.
Population
Sites 250 Concept House and Rear of 294 Farnborough Road
Alma House Crimea Road and Copthall House
Salamanca Park
Boots Depot Site
Concept House Farnborough Road
Farnborough Business Park Land at O'Gorman Avenue
Guillemont Fields
Ladywood Avenue
Land off Whetstone Road and NAAFI Guillemont Fields
Whetstone Road and Brownsover Road
41
3.5% of Test Valley’s population live in the 12 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(4,130 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The majority
of these people live in households.
More household spaces without usual residents
10.0% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 3.1% for the district as a whole.
Larger households
New development households are larger than the borough average with 2.55 people per household, compared to 2.40.
More bedrooms
34.5% of new development households have four or more bedrooms, compared to 29.0% overall.
Similar population density
The population density of new developments in urban areas of Test Valley is 12.1 people per hectare, slightly below the figure for Test Valley’s urban areas overall (13.3 people per hectare).
More likely to be private rented or under shared ownership
30.0% of households are private rented compared to only 12.9% across the borough as a whole. 3.1% are under shared ownership, compared to 0.7% overall.
Less likely to live alone, more likely to cohabit
Only 13.9% of new development households are one person households, much lower than the 24.9% average across the borough. 13.0% are cohabiting, higher than the borough average of only 9.3%.
More car ownership
The vast majority (92.7%) of new development households have at least one car, in comparison to 86.5% in Test Valley overall.
Test Valley
Households
42
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 12 years younger than for Test Valley as a whole (31 years, compared to 43 years). Over a quarter (26.0%) of household reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 11.6% overall.
Young population
1,260 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 34.9% of these are aged 0-4 years. Less likely to be single
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 25-49 are less likely to be single in new development than the borough overall.
More ethnically diverse
90.0% of new development residents are White British, compared to 92.6% for the borough overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy most other ethnicities, including 5.0% White Other and 1.6% Mixed, compared to the borough as a whole (3.4% and 1.3% respectively).
More likely to commute by cycle or on foot
6.3% of new development residents travel by bike compared to 2.9% across the borough. 12.5% walk, in comparison to 10.3% across the borough as a whole.
Population
Sites South of Knights
East Anton
Grove Place
West of Floral Way
Willow Way Estate
43
3.0% of Winchester’s population live in the 11 output areas (OAs) containing new development
(3,530 people). The majority of these live in OAs made up of mostly new development. The majority
of these people live in households.
Homes without usual residents
8.0% of household spaces in these new development areas do not have usual residents, compared to 4.7% for the district as a whole.
More flats
43.4% of accommodation in new development OAs is flats, compared to 16.7% for the district’s accommodation as a whole.
Smaller households
New development households are smaller than the district average with 1.99 people per household, compared to 2.38.
Smaller properties and fewer bedrooms
Almost a quarter (24.8%) of new development properties have 1-3 rooms, compared to only 11.0% across the district overall. A fifth (19.7%) of new development properties are studios or have only one bedroom, compared to 10.6% in Winchester as a whole.
More overcrowded
15.0% of households have an occupancy rating of -1 or less indicating that there are too few rooms for the number of people in that household, compared to the district average of 5.5%.
More densely populated
Population density of new developments in urban areas is greater than Winchester urban areas as a whole, with 24.2 people per hectare compared to 16.2. Showing that new developments consist of more concentrated housing and multi-story accommodation. 17.3% of new development is detached properties, compared to 36.6% for the district as a whole.
More private rented or under shared ownership
A much larger percentage of new development households are private rented, with 28.7% compared to 14.1% across the district. 4.2% of households are under shared ownership, compared to 0.9% overall.
More young people living alone and more cohabiting couples
A larger percentage of younger people live alone in new development areas than the district overall, with 29.7% in comparison to 14.0% overall. 18.8% are cohabiting couple households, much higher than the 8.9% average across the district.
Winchester
Households
44
Younger
Median age of the population living in new development OAs is 10 years younger than for
Winchester as a whole (32 years, compared to 42 years). Over a third (36.6%) of household
reference persons are aged under 35 in new developments, compared to 13.5% overall.
Young population
750 people aged 0-19 live in new development areas, 35.8% of these are aged 5-11 years.
More likely to be single or divorced
Household reference persons aged 25-34 and 35-49 are more likely to be single or divorced in
new development than the district overall.
More ethnically diverse
88.9% of new development residents are White British, compared to 91.8% for the district
overall. A larger percentage of new development residents occupy many other ethnicities,
including 4.9% White Other and 3.5% Asian, compared to the district as a whole
(3.9% and 2.3% respectively).
More likely to commute by car and less likely to work from home
69.1% drive to work, compared to 61.0% across the district as a whole. 5.2% of
new development residents work from home, below the district average of
9.1%.
Population
Sites Whiteley Farm
Harvest Home PH
Knowle Hospital
Staple Gardens
Old Park Farm
Winton House
45
Conclusion
New development areas in Hampshire have been shown to contain generally young and ethnically
diverse communities where families will mature and children will be born and may grow up.
They are characterised by tenures typical of younger adults in the current housing market, with
higher levels of private renting and shared ownership. The shared ownership options available on
new developments will have no doubt shaped the age and life stage of those that have moved in.
The properties tend to be smaller and more overcrowded, which again reflects the life stage of the
residents and the affordability of their accommodation. It also reflects the age of the properties
themselves, as there has been less time for additions such as conservatories, loft conversions or
garage conversions to be required or built.
New development areas are more densely populated and contain more concentrated housing such
as flats and terraces. Their smaller size means they contain many young people that live alone,
particularly in the more urban areas.
The particular characteristics seen in each district vary but there are some trends than span a few
areas but not Hampshire as a whole, these include:
Lower levels of home working, perhaps due to the younger stages of career or lower level
occupations of the occupants.
More mixed communities including higher proportions of social housing and lone parents, likely
reflecting the requirement to include affordable accommodation within new developments.
Some evidence of divorced residents moving into new development areas, perhaps due to their
need for affordable accommodation.
Some areas where larger and more exclusive developments are taking place.
In conclusion, despite making up a very small percentage of Hampshire’s overall land and
population, new housing developments have helped shape Hampshire’s overall population between
the 2001 and 2011 Censuses. They provide a necessary first step on the housing ladder and will likely
continue to do so in ongoing development that will be seen in censuses of the future.
46
Appendix
The charts below present the demographic characteristics described in each area summary. In the
charts with two bars for each area, the left hand bar represents the new development areas and the
right hand bar the area average (including the new development areas).
Figure 3: Percentage of the area’s population that live in new development output areas
1.1 0.6
7.4
0.2
2.5
0.4
6.7 5.6
0.8 0.2
2.0 1.4 1.5
2.5 2.1 0.2 1.7
1.9
1.6
1.8
2.1
1.7
1.0
1.1
0.9
2.6
2.1 1.6
1.7 1.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Entirely New Mostly New
47
Figure 4: Percentage of output areas that are urban and rural
Figure 5: Household spaces without usual residents
95
73 67 64
94 90 99 95
83 69
98
60 71 67 62
55 42
88 78
90 83
12 17
14
6 9 5
17
17
20
15
8 9
45
31
8
11
7 8
4
8 17
12 9 20 6 25
18 14
4 6
3 5
7 10 5 8 11 12 5 4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Urban city and town Rural town and fringe Rural village Rural hamlets and isolated dwellings
13
6
4 3 4
14
8
2
6
4 4
10
8
6 6
4 3
2
4
2 3
3 3 3
4 4
3
5
3 3
0
3
6
9
12
15
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Pe
rcen
tage
New Development Average
48
Figure 6: Household spaces by accommodation type
Figure 7: Percentage of household spaces that are flats
4 13
19 31
24
43
10
33 30 36
24 13
38 44
28 19
45
7 17
36 39
17
37
21
34
18 28 16
4
26 16
25
21
25
12
28
19
32
13 26
24
25
18
28
17
23
25
32
27 26
15
25
18
26
15
25
2
45
9
21 29
29
27
18
30
22
22
19
23
36
23 18
24
24
29
16
17
25
23 22
24
21
25
22
22
25
96
35
84
40 36
15 27
14
48
16 30
13
40
24 15 11
55
19
35
14
51
26 14 12
43
17
36
16
44
22
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Detached Semi-Detached Terraced Flat Caravan or other
96
84
36
27
48
30
40
15
55
35
51
14
43
36
44
35 40
15 14 16 13
24
11
19 14
26
12 17 16
22
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Per
cen
tage
New Development Average
49
Figure 8: Average household size
1.6
1.9
2.3
2.5
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.8
2.1
2.5 2.4
2.6
2.0
2.3 2.3
2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4
2.3
2.5
2.3 2.3
2.5
2.4 2.4 2.4
2.2
1.50
1.70
1.90
2.10
2.30
2.50
2.70
2.90
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Ave
rage
Ho
use
ho
ld S
ize
New Development Average
50
Figure 9: Number of rooms
The definition of a room does not include bathrooms, toilets, halls or landings, or rooms that can only be used for storage. All other rooms, for example, kitchens, living rooms, bedrooms, utility rooms, studies and conservatories are counted. If two rooms have been converted into one they are counted as one room. Rooms shared between a number of households, for example a shared kitchen, are not counted.
64
18
47
23 25
11 16 10
22 10 12 8
23 14
4 7
30
11 16 9
28
15 7 9
25
11 20
10
25 13
34
63
49
62 54
59 58
53
66
62 61 59
49 66
52 50
63
65 63
62
62
65
58 57
59
52
57
59
55
60
1
19
5 15
20 30 26
37
12
28 28 33 28 20
45 43
7
23 21 29
10 20
35 34
17
37
23 30
20 27
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
1-3 rooms 4-6 rooms 7 or more rooms
51
Figure 10: Number of bedrooms
A bedroom is defined as any room that was intended to be used as a bedroom when the property was built, or any room that has been permanently converted for use as a bedroom. It also includes all rooms intended for use as a bedroom even if not being used as a bedroom at the time of the Census. Bedsits and studio flats are counted as having one bedroom.
35
16
32 21
12 9 13 9 13 9 9 8 11 12 2 7
18 11 6 9
16 13 4 9
20 11 11 10 15 12
64
71
58
66
66 65 61
59
76
68 67 66 62
74
55 55
75
71 74 69
72 71
61 62
64
57 66 65
65 66
1 13 10 13
22 26 26 31
11 23 24 26 27
13
43 38
7 18 20 23
12 16
34 29
16
32 23 25 20 22
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
0-1 bedroom 2-3 bedrooms 4 or more bedrooms
52
Figure 11: Percentage of households with an occupancy rating of -1 or less (over occupied) and an
occupancy rating of +1 or more (under occupied). Households with sufficient occupancy are not
shown
Figure 12: Population density – urban city and town
-22
-67
-35
-60 -61 -78 -66 -81
-53 -79 -72 -84
-66 -74 -82 -85 -50
-76 -66 -82 -51
-69 -80 -82 -62
-80 -64 -79 -59
-75
41
11
31
14 15 6 9 5
12 5 7 4
13 6 3 4 17
7 8 4 16
10 4 4 15
6 12 5 15
7
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f H
ou
seh
old
s
Under Occupied Over Occupied
134
94
45
31
54
17 21 30
21
42
62
12
24 29 33
51 47
19 9
19 18
33
14
25
11
24
13 16 16 21
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Peo
ple
Pe
r H
ecta
re
New Development All
53
Figure 13: Households by tenure
Figure 14: Percentage of households that are under shared ownership (part owned and part rented)
13 24
8 22
8
28 17
37
8
33 17
39
15 29
12
36
17
35
14
44
7 23
13
34
17
35
12
35
11
32 15
31
19
28 46
40
34
37
32
41
47
41
40
36 58
43
28
34
35
31
35
40
39
36
37
33
42
37
38
35
10 6
6 6
8
5
5
8
4 3 11
2
3 4 6 6
22
18
14
23 20
18 32
12
25
12 18 8
13 16
5 8
24
20
17
11
22
16
14
14
13
15 18
14
18
16 38
25
52
25 19 12 11 12
25 12 13 10
26 16 17 12
26 10
30 12
25 18 30
13 29
14 22 13
26 16
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Owned outright Owned with a mortgage or loan Shared ownership
Social rented Private rented Living rent free
10.1
5.5 5.8 5.8
8.5
4.8 4.5
7.8
4.0 3.5
10.7
3.1
4.2
6.0 6.2
1.0 1.0 1.4 0.9 1.1
0.6 1.1 1.1
0.5 0.6
1.8
0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Per
cen
tage
New Development Average
54
Figure 15: Households by composition
Figure 16: Percentage of households that contain cohabiting couples
4 12 4
11 10 8 13 12 4
13 4
13 10 8 15 4
16 9 12 4 13
3 13
3 12
40 20 39 22 25 16 20 13
22 15
18 12
22 17
14 12 21 14
16
13 25 16
12
13 30 14 22
14 24
16
3
6 6 8 3 11 9
4 12 4
9 10
4 11
3
14 6
3
10 11 10 9
17 27 13 27 37
40 37
42
29
39 39
40 39
33
53
46
23
34
42
36
32 38
54
41 27
40
38
39 34
36
15 11 17
11 19 11
14 8
22
10 16
9 15 10 16
9
17
10 14
8
17 11 13 9
19 9
17 10
17 10 8 12
6 10
9 9 13 8 16
9 13 8 10 12 7 7 19
11 13 8 12 10 8 8 8 7 11 9 10 9
14 12 20 12 7 6 5 5 7 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 7 6 7 5 11 9 7 6 8 7 7 6 9 8
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
One person: Aged 65 and over One person: OtherFamily: All aged 65 and over Family: Married/civil partnership coupleFamily: Cohabiting couple Family: Lone parentOther household types
15
17 19
14
22
16 15
16 17
14
17
13
19 17 17
11 11 11
8 10
9 10
9 10 8
11 9 9 10 10
0
5
10
15
20
25
Po
rtsm
ou
th
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Per
cen
tage
New Development Average
55
Figure 17: Households by car ownership
Figure 18: Percentage of the population that are male
42 33 37
30
14 15 12 11 15 13 8
13 13 23
3 8
32 21
8 13 15 17
7 13 13 14 13 15 16 19
47
44 48
45
45 40 45 37
49 41
43 40
47
48
34 35
46
42
50 42 50 43
39 39 45 39 45 41
45 41
10
18 13
20
35 34
36
37
32
35 42 35 33
24
54 42
18
28 35 33
30 31
43 35 34
34 36
33 33 30
1 4 2 5 6 11 7 15
4 11 8 11 7 6 9
15 4 9 6
12 4 9 11 12 8 12
7 11 6 10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
No cars or vans 1 car or van 2 cars or vans 3 or more cars or vans
56 53
50 47 48 48
51 50 48 50 51 52 52
50 51 50 50 50 49 49 49 49 50 49 48 50 49 49 49 49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Po
rtsm
ou
th
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Per
cen
tage
New Development Average
56
Figure 19: Median age
Figure 20: Age of household reference persons
28 25
30 31 28
33 33 33 29 30
28 31 32
30 30 34
32
39
44 41
44 40 41
44 47
36
43 42 42 40
0
10
20
30
40
50
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Age
New Development Average
20
7
21 8 7 3 6 10
3 6 6 3 11
3 5 8 3 5 6 3 6 9 4
37
18
40
20 36
15 9
37
13
24
10
22 14 22
10
26
11
29
8
36
17 21
10
31
11
30
11
31
13
21
29
25
28
39
33
39
29
34
30
41
29
40
29
54
33
26
26
38
25
37
35
47
30
33
28
40
29
37
29
13
23
9
22
14
27
23
31
14
28
19
29
22
27
18
29
20
28
19
29
13
25
18
30
20
29
17
28
16
27
9
22
6
22
5
23 13
30
5
26
11
31
10
26
6
27 16
32
9
37
6
20 8
28
11
30
8
29
7
27
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Age 24 and under Age 25 to 34 Age 35 to 49 Age 50 to 64 Age 65 and over
57
Figure 21: Young population
Figure 22: Household reference persons aged 25-34 by marital status
227 256
1,790
213 719
282 635 760
241 214 493 440 256 166
1,077
186
366
208
578 625
132 164 356 304
205
846
207
288
189
412 396
258 282 526
652
269 397 251
135
227 298
166
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Nu
mb
er
of
pe
op
le
Aged 0 - 4 Aged 5 - 9 Aged 10-14 Aged 15-19
73 65
77 66
58 57 59 52
66 57 59 56 61 57 52 51
64 61
40 57 59
51
34
53 68
58 58 56 62 59
24 27
17 27 35 35 32
40 28
35 34 36 29 32 40 42 27 29
50
35 34 41
58
38 23
36 34 36 31 33
4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 6 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 5 3 4 4 3 4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Single Married Civil partnership Separated Divorced Widowed
58
Figure 23: Household reference persons aged 35-49 by marital status
Figure 24: Percentage of the population that is Non-White British
43 32
44 33
25 23 21 19 26 22 22 19 20 24
17 19 33
25 22 22 27 24 14 20
32 22 23 22 25 24
31 41
29 42
49 53 53 59 40 53 51 57 53 46 65 63 30 48 47 53 45 53 64 57 37 59 51 55 49 51
6 7 8 7 7 6 8 6
11 6 7 7
7 8
5 5
9 7
8 6 8
6 7 6 10
5 7 6 7 6
19 19 19 17 17 16 17 15 22 17 18 16 20 21 13 13
26 19 21 17 19 16 15 16 22
13 18 16 18 17
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Single Married Civil partnership Separated Divorced Widowed
40 41
21
9
17
7 8
17
7
14
22
10 11
15 18
16
22
12
7 8 5 6
9
5 5
20
7 8 8 11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Po
rtsm
out
h
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Pe
rcen
tage
New Development Average
59
Figure 25: Percentage of the working population aged 16-74 that work from home, travel to work by
train or bus, as a passenger in a car or van, by bicycle or on foot
Figure 26: Percentage of the working population aged 16-74 that drive a car or van to work
5 3 3 3 5 6 6 9 3 5 6 5 4 3
8 8 2 4 5 8
3 4 4 7 5 9
5 6 5 6
7 4 5 3
8 5 7 5
7 4 5 4 2
12 7
5 3 2 2
9 7 3 3 5
6 7 4 6 4
6
7 8 9 5 4 3 3 2
3 5 8 5 3
2 4 4
2 2
3 3 3 4 4
5 6 5 7 5
5 5 4 5 5 3 5
4 5
3 3 9
6 5
5 5 5
5 5
3
4 5 5 5 5
5 7 4 5 2 2 2 3
3 4 10
11 2
4
3 5 4
3 3 6
3 2
2 3 3 3 4
23 17
30
16
8 10 11 9 10
7 6
7 7
10
4 7
11
8 6
8 9 10 12 10
12
14 8 9
11 11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60P
ort
smo
uth
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
inc
P&
S
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Work mainly at or from home Train Bus, minibus or coach
Passenger in a car or van Bicycle On foot
46 42
67 68 68
76
65 70
58
73
66 65 69 67
65
52 54
66 68 71 71
59
69 68 69 65
67
61
67 64
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Po
rtsm
ou
th
Sou
tham
pto
n
Bas
ings
toke
an
d D
ean
e
East
Ham
psh
ire
East
leig
h
Fare
ham
Go
spo
rt
Har
t
Hav
ant
New
Fo
rest
Ru
shm
oo
r
Test
Val
ley
Win
ches
ter
Ham
psh
ire
Co
un
ty
Ham
psh
ire
incl
ud
ing
P&
S
Per
cen
tage
New Development Average