The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have...

20
Chapter 18.1 The Debate over Slavery Unit 10

Transcript of The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have...

Page 1: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

Chapter 18.1The Debate over Slavery

Unit 10

Page 2: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

The Debate over SlaveryWilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty

W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories.

P. Sovereignty: allows each territory to decide the issue.

Debate shows growing sectionalism of the country.Favor of region over interest of the country as

whole.

WASHINGTON WARNED US!!!!Danger of political parties, founded on

geographical discriminations.

Page 3: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

DO YOU REMEMBER???What territories have we recently talked

about, that have entered the Union?

• Missouri •Texas•Mexican Cession•California•Louisiana Territory

SLAVE STATE VS. FREE STATE

Page 4: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

CA entered the Union as a free state.The rest of the Mexican Cession divided into

2 territories: Utah & New Mexico.Issue of slavery decided by pop. sovereignty.

TX gave up land claims in New Mexico in return for financial help.

Outlawed slavery in Wash. DC Created Fugitive Slave Act.

The Compromise of 1850

HAVE NO FEAR….. HENRY CLAY IS HERE!!!!

Henry Clay helps create a

compromise!

Page 5: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:
Page 6: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

Fugitive Slave ActMade it a federal

crime to help runaway slaves.

Let officials arrest runaways in areas where slavery was

illegal.

Page 7: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

Fugitive Slave ActAgents could arrest suspected

runaways before U.S. commissioners.Commissioners pay: $5 to reject an agent’s claim, $10 to return the suspected

slave to the South.

What effect will this act have on

slavery???

Page 8: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

Antislavery LiteratureAbolitionists used stories, like slave

narratives, to gain support.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin, by Harriet Beecher Stowe (1852)Stowe wanted to write a

book to show what slavery was really like.

Book sold 2 million copies w/in 10 years.Stowe had created

“two millions of abolitionists”

Page 9: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

18.2 Trouble in Kansas

Page 10: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

The Election of 1852Democratic Whigs

FRANKLIN PIERCE • Supported Compromise of

1850 and enforce the Fugitive Slave Act

• South Supported Pierce

WINFIELD SCOTT• Mexican War hero• Did not completely support

the Compromise of 1850

Hypothesize

WHO DO YOU THINK WINS?

Franklin

Pierce

Page 11: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act• Stephen Douglas wanted a railroad from Chicago to

the Pacific.

Page 12: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act•HOWEVER, the Louisiana Purchase had to become

federal territory without slavery. (Missouri Compromise)

The South was not happy with this idea.

Page 13: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

The Kansas-Nebraska ActCompromise

•The Kansas-Nebraska Act:

• Divide the rest of the Louisiana Purchase into two territories.• Kansas and Nebraska.

• Popular Sovereignty decided the question of slavery.

Page 14: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

The Kansas-Nebraska Act•Antislavery Northerners were outraged.

•Lost in the controversy, Douglas’s railroad never happened.

FAIL!

Page 15: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

REVIEW

A contest for Kansas has Began!

What is Popular Sovereignty?

Page 16: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

“Bleeding Kansas”Antislavery Northerners VS. Proslavery Southerners

1856- Kansas had two governments and an angry population divided into two

armed camps.

Page 17: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

“Bleeding Kansas”May 1856 – Pro-Slavery posse of more than 700 men rode to Lawrence, where they destroyed buildings and printing presses.

Page 18: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

“Bleeding Kansas”•Pottawatomie Massacre• John Brown and seven men killed 5 pro-slavery

men in response to the Sack of Lawerence.

Kansas goes into a civil war.200 people killed

“Bleeding Kansas”

Page 19: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty:

Conflict in CongressCharles Sumner’s anti-slavery speech, “The Crime Against Kansas” was given in congress and upset Preston Brooks.

Brooks will beat Sumner unconsciously with a walking stick.

Page 20: The Debate over Slavery Unit 10. Wilmot Proviso vs. Popular Sovereignty W. Proviso: would have banned slavery completely in new territories. P. Sovereignty: