The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA...

16
The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) - Contract No EPG 1/8/59 Presented by Mike J Woodfield Howard J Rudd, Keith J Vincent JohnR Stedman & Ian T Marlowe

Transcript of The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA...

Page 1: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

The costs of reducing PM10 emissions and concentrations in the UK

A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport

and the Regions (DETR) - Contract No EPG 1/8/59

Presented by Mike J Woodfield

Howard J Rudd, Keith J Vincent

JohnR Stedman & Ian T Marlowe

Page 2: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 2

Objectives

Identify main sources and their emissions Identify possible emission reduction measures and

their costs Construct cost curves for reductions in emissions Use dispersion modelling to convert the emission

cost curves into cost curves based on concentration.

Develop these curves for different years from 1997 to 2015 inclusive, with particular interest for 2003 to 2010.

Carry out the analysis both nationally and for a number of carefully chosen regions in the UK.

Identify the effect of emission reduction measures on emissions of other pollutants.

Page 3: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 3

Emission sources

Source 1998kilotonnes(kte)

cumulative %of totalemission

Road transport (tailpipe, tyre and brake) 39.9 21.9%

Domestic combustion 26.4 36.4%

Power stations 23.5 49.3%

Quarrying 23.3 62.1%

Road transport (road dust re-suspension) 18.9 72.5%

Iron & steel industry 6.47 76.1%

Other industry (combustion) 5.33 79.0%

Offshore own gas use 4.25 81.4%

In-house electricity generation in industry 4.14 83.6%

Construction 3.83 85.7%

Refineries (combustion) 3.71 87.8%

Other industry (small processes) 3.44 89.7%

Cement production 2.86 91.2%

Page 4: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 4

Emission sources

Major source is coal-fired stations Gas-fired stations report zero particulate

emissions(although this is unlikely)

Only a few oil-fired stations

Power Stations

Page 5: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 5

Emission sources

Power Stations

Station Operator Commission-ing Year(c)

Declared Netcapacity (MW)

TotalParticulate1998 (tonnes)

TotalParticulate1999(tonnes)

PM10 1998(tonnes)

PM10 1999(tonnes)

Blyth Nitrogen Two Limited 1958 -196 456 (A) + 626 (B) 573 51.1 458 40.3Aberthaw B Npower plc 1967 - 1978 1455 1270 801 918 641Cottam PowerGen (UK) plc 1968 - 1970 2008 2648 2322 2118 1858Didcot A(a) Npower plc 1969 - 1975 1470 +490 1100 820 840 660Drakelow C Eastern Merchant

Generation Ltd1965 - 1996 976 507 437 414 350

Drax AES Drax Power Ltd 1961 - 1974 3870 2640 2100 2112 1700Eggborough Eggborough Power Ltd 1967 - 1969 2005 2680 2110 2150 1680Ferrybridge C Edison First Power Ltd 1966 - 1968 1470 2967 3025 2374 2420Fiddlers Ferry Edison First Power Ltd 1969 - 1973 1926 2143 2000 1714 1600Fifoots Point (d) AES Fifoots Point Ltd 1999 370 no data no dataHigh Marnham Eastern Merchant

Generation Ltd1959 - 1962 945 1444 979 1155 783

Ironbridge B Eastern MerchantGeneration Ltd

1967 - 1970 970 732 315 586 252

Kingsnorth PowerGen (UK) plc 1961 - 1973 1455 3205 2564Ratcliffe PowerGen (UK) plc 1966 - 1970 2000 112 97 89 77Rugeley B Eastern Merchant

Generation Ltd1969 - 1972 996 544 370 435 296

Tilbury B Npower plc 1965 - 1972 680 1000 751 781 601West Burton Eastern Merchant

Generation Ltd1966 - 1968 1972 2371 1010 1897 808

Willington B National Power plc 1963 188 142 332 114 266

Coal fired Power Stations in England & Wales, 1999

Page 6: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 6

Emission reduction measures

Upgrade Electrostatic Precipitators Fuel Switching FGD

Power Stations

Page 7: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 7

Electrostatic precipitators

1 eliminate leaks to reduce air ingress2 (for combustion processes) optimise

combustion and eliminate excess air3 improve the voltage control system4 optimise the rapping sequence5 reduce the gas velocity through the device6 replace the unit with a newer more

efficient design

Improving collection efficiency

Page 8: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 8

Electrostatic precipitators

Assume all UK power stations have already achieved a stack concentration of 50mg/m3 by applying measures 1 to 4 above.

Table shows costs for option 5 above

Improving collection efficiency

20mg/m3 10mg/m3

Capital cost £3M £5MOperating cost £40k £62kLifetime 25 years 25 yearsOverall cost £3,000/tonne

abated£3,800/tonneabated

Page 9: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 9

Fuel Switching

Close down old coal fired plants Replace with efficient modern CCGT stations

Capital cost of new CCGT station = £300/kWe of generating capacity

Fuel cost saving = £3,000/MW of generating capacity

Overall cost = £5,600/tonne abated

Page 10: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 10

FGD

Capital cost = £100M Operating cost = £2M/year Overall cost = £39,000/tonne abated

2000 MW power Station

Page 11: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 11

Cost CurveCost Effectiveness of Measures for Reducing UK PM10

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

Emission Remaining (kTonnes)

Mar

gina

l Cos

t of A

bate

men

t Mea

sure

(k£/

tonn

e)

1998

2000

2005

2010

2015

Page 12: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 12

Dispersion modelling

Population weighted annual arithmetic mean concentration

Contribution of each emission source Nationally and for 6 case study regions

Page 13: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 13

Regional Analysis

Page 14: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 14

Concentration cost curve

1.E+00

1.E+03

1.E+06

1.E+09

1.E+12

1.E+15

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Concentration, g m-3

Ab

ate

men

t co

st (

£)/

g m

-3

National

Glasgow

West Yorkshire

Manchester

West Midlands

Neath

London

Page 15: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 15

Conclusions 1

Many measures for reducing PM10 emissions are very expensive in terms of the cost per tonne abated.

Reducing emissions below 80 kte/y is virtually impossible using measures applied to stationary sources alone.

Reducing emissions to about 100kte may be feasible, although the costs to industry would still be quite high.

Page 16: The costs of reducing PM 10 emissions and concentrations in the UK A project carried out by AEA Technology for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport.

Slide 16

Conclusions 2

The contribution of stationary sources to ambient concentrations, both nationally and in the case study regions, are all small compared with the contribution of road transport

Measurements to better characterise: Domestic gas combustion and Quarrying

would be highly beneficial