The Constructivist View of Perceptionjfkihlstrom... · MC. Escher. 16. Salvador Dali. 17 “Slave...

55
1 The Constructivist View of Perception Lecture 16

Transcript of The Constructivist View of Perceptionjfkihlstrom... · MC. Escher. 16. Salvador Dali. 17 “Slave...

  • 1

    The Constructivist Viewof Perception

    Lecture 16

  • 2

    Problems for Ecological Perception

    • Conceptual Problem– Availability vs. Utilization

    • Empirical Problems– Organization– Pattern Recognition– Perceptual Constancies– Ambiguous (Reversible) Figures– Perceptual Illusions– Cultural Differences– Perceptual Problem-Solving

  • 3

    Perception as Construction

    • Conditions– Stimulus information insufficient for perception– Stimulus information is misleading

    • Perception is intelligent– Problem-Solving Activity– Requires knowledge of the world– Entails judgment, inference, reasoning

    The perceiver must go“beyond the information given”

    by the stimulusJerome Bruner (1973)

  • 4

    The Constructivist Traditionin Perception

    Hermann von Helmholtz

    Richard Gregory

    Julian Hochberg

    Irvin Rock

  • 5

    The Rubin VaseRubin (1915)

  • 6

    Silver Jubileeof

    Queen Elizabeth II

  • 7

    The Necker CubeNecker (1832)

  • 8

    The Schröder StaircaseSchröder (1854)

  • 9

    The “Antioch Cube”Gombrich (1960)

  • 10

  • 11

    San Giovanni LaternoRome, c. 1587

  • 12

    The “Boring” FigureBoring (1930); Puck (1915)

  • 13

    The Jastrow FigureJastrow (1899, 1900)

    Harper’s Weekly (1892); Die Fliegende Blatter (1892)

  • 14

    Ambiguous FiguresReversible Figures

    Bistable Figures

    • Pattern of proximal stimulation constant– Retinal image doesn’t change

    • Perception of distal stimulus is changes– Mental representation does change

  • 15

    MC. Escher

  • 16

    Salvador Dali

  • 17

    “Slave Market with Disappearing Bust of Voltaire”

    Dali (1940), after Houdon (1778)

  • 18

    The Müller-Lyer IllusionMüller-Lyer (1889)

  • 19

    The Müller-Lyer IllusionMüller-Lyer (1889)

  • 20

    Muller-Lyer Illusion

  • 21

    Muller-Lyer Illusion

  • 22

    The Ponzo IllusionPonzo (1913)

  • 23

    The Ponzo IllusionPonzo (1913)

  • 24

    The Ebbinghaus IllusionEbbinghaus (1897); aka “Titchener Circles” (1901)

  • 25

    Parallel Lines IllusionsHering (1861); Wundt (1897)

  • 26

    The Poggendorf IllusionPoggendorff (1860), after Zollner (1860)

  • 27

    The Poggendorf IllusionPoggendorff (1860), after Zollner (1860)

  • 28

    The Poggendorf Illusionand the Union JackPoggendorff (1860), after Zollner (1860)

    J.D.A. Wiseman

  • 29

    Horizontal-Vertical IllusionWundt (1858), after Fick (1851)

  • 30

    Gateway Arch, St. LouisEero Saarinen (1947)

  • 31

    Unconscious Inference in Illusions

    • Upper line appears farther away– Size an inverse function of distance

    • Retinal image same size as lower line• Therefore the upper line must be longer than

    the lower line

    Unconscious inferences represent“going beyond the information given”

  • 32

    The Moon IllusionKaufman & Rock (1962); Rock & Kaufman (1962)

  • 33

  • 34

    How the Ames Room WorksAmes (1934-1935)

  • 35

    Distance Cues and Unconscious Inference in the Ames Room

    • Lack of distance cues– Misleading stimulus

    information• Unconventional geometry

    – Inappropriate expectations• No compensation for

    differences in retinal size

  • 36

    “Shiprock” or “Rock with Wings”?Tse’Bit’Ai

  • 37

  • 38

    Two Views of the Arizona Whale-Kangaroo

    Canonical Noncanonical

  • 39

    Comparative Frequency of PerceptKihlstrom, Peterson, et al. (2006)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Noncanonical Canonical Noncanonical Canonical

    % o

    f Sub

    ject

    s

    Orientation of Kangaroo

    American Australian

    Whale Kangaroo

  • 40

    Constellations as PerceptsOrion, Taurus, and Friends

    Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

  • 41

    Perceptionsof

    Ursa Major

    Japan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCarl Sagan, Cosmos

  • 42

    A “Gestalt” Figure

  • 43

    Gestalt Completion TestStreet (1931)

  • 44

    Gestalt Completion TestStreet (1931)

  • 45

    Gestalt Completion TestStreet (1931)

  • 46

    Gestalt Completion TestStreet (1931)

  • 47

    “Canali”On Mars

    Schiaparelli (1880s)

    Sheehan (1988)Sheehan & O’Meara (2001)

  • 48

    “Canals”on Mars

    Lowell (1894)

    Sheehan (1988)Sheehan & O’Meara (2001)

  • 49Sheehan (1988)

    Sheehan & O’Meara (2001)

    Mars: The View from MarinerNASA, 1960s

  • 50

    Contrasting Views of Perception

    • Ecological View– Perception given by information in stimulus– Perceive the world, as it is, directly

    • Constructivist View– Perception “goes beyond the information given”– Actively construct mental representation of world

  • 51

    Perception as Problem Solving

    • Sources of Information– Proximal Stimulus (“Bottom-Up”)

    • figure, ground• primary, secondary modalities

    – Schemata (“Top-Down”)• world knowledge• expectations, beliefs

    • Inferential Rules– Unconscious inferences– Conscious problem-solving

  • 52

    The Perceptual CycleNeisser (1976)

    Object

    Schema(Knowledge,Expectations,

    Beliefs)

    Action(Thought,Behavior)

    Modifies(Accommodation)

    Directs

    Modifies(Assimilation)

    “Perception is where cognition and reality meet”

  • 53

    Perceptual Hypothesis-Testing

    • Perceptual Cycle Begins– Mismatch between object and schema

    • … Continues– Assimilation of object to schema– Accommodation of schema to object

    • … Completed – Object identified, categorized

    • … Begins Anew – New surprising event

  • 54

    Perceptual Hypothesis-Testing

    • If Stimulus Information Rich, Structured– Perception is Automatic

    • If Stimulus Information Vague, Fragmentary– Perception Requires Active Problem-Solving

    • Percept as Compromise– Between Expectations, Reality

    • Constructive Alternativism– Different Perceptions of Same Object, Event

  • 55

    Perception as Effort After MeaningBartlett (1932)

    • Constructive Activity– “Build Up” Mental Representation of World– Test a Hypothesis About the World

    • Goes “Beyond the Information Given”– Draws on Memory– Invokes Judgment, Reasoning, Inference

    The Constructivist View�of PerceptionProblems for Ecological PerceptionPerception as ConstructionThe Constructivist Tradition�in PerceptionThe Rubin Vase�Rubin (1915)Silver Jubilee�of�Queen Elizabeth II�The Necker Cube�Necker (1832)The Schröder Staircase�Schröder (1854)The “Antioch Cube”�Gombrich (1960)Slide Number 10San Giovanni Laterno�Rome, c. 1587The “Boring” Figure�Boring (1930); Puck (1915)The Jastrow Figure�Jastrow (1899, 1900)�Harper’s Weekly (1892); Die Fliegende Blatter (1892)Ambiguous Figures�Reversible Figures�Bistable FiguresMC. EscherSalvador Dali“Slave Market �with Disappearing Bust of Voltaire”�Dali (1940), after Houdon (1778)The Müller-Lyer Illusion�Müller-Lyer (1889)The Müller-Lyer Illusion�Müller-Lyer (1889)Muller-Lyer IllusionMuller-Lyer IllusionThe Ponzo Illusion�Ponzo (1913)The Ponzo Illusion�Ponzo (1913)The Ebbinghaus Illusion�Ebbinghaus (1897); aka “Titchener Circles” (1901)Parallel Lines Illusions�Hering (1861); Wundt (1897)The Poggendorf Illusion�Poggendorff (1860), after Zollner (1860)The Poggendorf Illusion�Poggendorff (1860), after Zollner (1860)The Poggendorf Illusion�and the Union Jack�Poggendorff (1860), after Zollner (1860)Horizontal-Vertical Illusion�Wundt (1858), after Fick (1851)Gateway Arch, St. Louis�Eero Saarinen (1947)Unconscious Inference in IllusionsThe Moon Illusion�Kaufman & Rock (1962); Rock & Kaufman (1962)Slide Number 33How the Ames Room Works�Ames (1934-1935)Distance Cues and Unconscious Inference in the Ames Room“Shiprock” or “Rock with Wings”?�Tse’Bit’AiSlide Number 37Two Views of the �Arizona Whale-KangarooComparative Frequency of Percept�Kihlstrom, Peterson, et al. (2006)Constellations as Percepts�Orion, Taurus, and FriendsPerceptions�of�Ursa MajorA “Gestalt” FigureGestalt Completion Test�Street (1931)Gestalt Completion Test�Street (1931)Gestalt Completion Test�Street (1931)Gestalt Completion Test�Street (1931)Slide Number 47Slide Number 48Slide Number 49Contrasting Views of PerceptionPerception as Problem SolvingThe Perceptual Cycle�Neisser (1976)Perceptual Hypothesis-TestingPerceptual Hypothesis-TestingPerception as Effort After Meaning�Bartlett (1932)