The Coming Transition in Automobile Cockpits Insights from Aerospace Prof. R. John Hansman...
-
Upload
howard-marshall -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of The Coming Transition in Automobile Cockpits Insights from Aerospace Prof. R. John Hansman...
The Coming Transition inAutomobile Cockpits
Insights from Aerospace
Prof R John HansmanDepartment of Aeronautics amp Astronautics
Evolution of Cockpit Displays
bull Software size doubles every 18 months
bull Compensating for ldquoFBW offsetrdquo reduces doubling to 33 months
Software Growth in Aircraft
Hypothesis
bull We are entering a period of significant change in automobile Human-Machine Interaction driven by Information Technologies
bull Automobiles will undergo a change more substantial than the change in aircraft from ldquosteam gaugerdquo to ldquoglass cockpitsrdquo
Car Aircraft Comparison
bull Market
bull Number of vehicles (US)
bull Safety (US)
bull Threat response time constant
bull Hazard density
bull System complexity
Capital investment (ROI)Consumer product
300000200000000
663 fatalities (1998)41000 fatalities (1997)
Order 5-60 secOrder 1 sec
Low 3-D collision (vehicle terrain animal) WXHigh 2-D collision (vehicle object person animal hellip)
HighMedlow
Car Aircraft Comparison (cont)
bull Operator selectivitytrainingmedical
bull Tracking precision (Heading)
bull Recurrent training
bull Operations procedure
bull Impaired operators (Alcohol Drugs)
HighLow
Order 5degOrder 1deg
YesNo
YesNo
Order 1107 - 109
Order 1104 - 105
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Evolution of Cockpit Displays
bull Software size doubles every 18 months
bull Compensating for ldquoFBW offsetrdquo reduces doubling to 33 months
Software Growth in Aircraft
Hypothesis
bull We are entering a period of significant change in automobile Human-Machine Interaction driven by Information Technologies
bull Automobiles will undergo a change more substantial than the change in aircraft from ldquosteam gaugerdquo to ldquoglass cockpitsrdquo
Car Aircraft Comparison
bull Market
bull Number of vehicles (US)
bull Safety (US)
bull Threat response time constant
bull Hazard density
bull System complexity
Capital investment (ROI)Consumer product
300000200000000
663 fatalities (1998)41000 fatalities (1997)
Order 5-60 secOrder 1 sec
Low 3-D collision (vehicle terrain animal) WXHigh 2-D collision (vehicle object person animal hellip)
HighMedlow
Car Aircraft Comparison (cont)
bull Operator selectivitytrainingmedical
bull Tracking precision (Heading)
bull Recurrent training
bull Operations procedure
bull Impaired operators (Alcohol Drugs)
HighLow
Order 5degOrder 1deg
YesNo
YesNo
Order 1107 - 109
Order 1104 - 105
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
bull Software size doubles every 18 months
bull Compensating for ldquoFBW offsetrdquo reduces doubling to 33 months
Software Growth in Aircraft
Hypothesis
bull We are entering a period of significant change in automobile Human-Machine Interaction driven by Information Technologies
bull Automobiles will undergo a change more substantial than the change in aircraft from ldquosteam gaugerdquo to ldquoglass cockpitsrdquo
Car Aircraft Comparison
bull Market
bull Number of vehicles (US)
bull Safety (US)
bull Threat response time constant
bull Hazard density
bull System complexity
Capital investment (ROI)Consumer product
300000200000000
663 fatalities (1998)41000 fatalities (1997)
Order 5-60 secOrder 1 sec
Low 3-D collision (vehicle terrain animal) WXHigh 2-D collision (vehicle object person animal hellip)
HighMedlow
Car Aircraft Comparison (cont)
bull Operator selectivitytrainingmedical
bull Tracking precision (Heading)
bull Recurrent training
bull Operations procedure
bull Impaired operators (Alcohol Drugs)
HighLow
Order 5degOrder 1deg
YesNo
YesNo
Order 1107 - 109
Order 1104 - 105
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Hypothesis
bull We are entering a period of significant change in automobile Human-Machine Interaction driven by Information Technologies
bull Automobiles will undergo a change more substantial than the change in aircraft from ldquosteam gaugerdquo to ldquoglass cockpitsrdquo
Car Aircraft Comparison
bull Market
bull Number of vehicles (US)
bull Safety (US)
bull Threat response time constant
bull Hazard density
bull System complexity
Capital investment (ROI)Consumer product
300000200000000
663 fatalities (1998)41000 fatalities (1997)
Order 5-60 secOrder 1 sec
Low 3-D collision (vehicle terrain animal) WXHigh 2-D collision (vehicle object person animal hellip)
HighMedlow
Car Aircraft Comparison (cont)
bull Operator selectivitytrainingmedical
bull Tracking precision (Heading)
bull Recurrent training
bull Operations procedure
bull Impaired operators (Alcohol Drugs)
HighLow
Order 5degOrder 1deg
YesNo
YesNo
Order 1107 - 109
Order 1104 - 105
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Car Aircraft Comparison
bull Market
bull Number of vehicles (US)
bull Safety (US)
bull Threat response time constant
bull Hazard density
bull System complexity
Capital investment (ROI)Consumer product
300000200000000
663 fatalities (1998)41000 fatalities (1997)
Order 5-60 secOrder 1 sec
Low 3-D collision (vehicle terrain animal) WXHigh 2-D collision (vehicle object person animal hellip)
HighMedlow
Car Aircraft Comparison (cont)
bull Operator selectivitytrainingmedical
bull Tracking precision (Heading)
bull Recurrent training
bull Operations procedure
bull Impaired operators (Alcohol Drugs)
HighLow
Order 5degOrder 1deg
YesNo
YesNo
Order 1107 - 109
Order 1104 - 105
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Car Aircraft Comparison (cont)
bull Operator selectivitytrainingmedical
bull Tracking precision (Heading)
bull Recurrent training
bull Operations procedure
bull Impaired operators (Alcohol Drugs)
HighLow
Order 5degOrder 1deg
YesNo
YesNo
Order 1107 - 109
Order 1104 - 105
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Aerospace Systems Applicable to Cars
bull Control systemsndash ABSndash Stability augmentation
bull Fly by WireLight (FBWFBL)ndash Integrity Concerns (eg
777)bull Critical software systemsbull Fault tolerant systemsbull Head up displays (HUD)bull Helmet mounted displays
(HMD)bull Synthetic Vision Systemsbull Sensor Fusionbull Hands on throttle and stic
k (HOTAS)bull Dark cockpit
bull Navigation systemsndash GPS DGPSndash IRSGPS
bull Situation awareness displaysndash Moving mapndash Database
bull Caution and Warning Systemsbull Collision Alerting Systemsbull Tactile alerting
ndash Stick shakerbull Master caution
ndash Information accessibilityndash Maintenance Diagnostics
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Track Hardware Layout
bull Two 2 GPS antennas were mounted on the car to form a single baseline
bull Data-Linc Group (SRM6000) Modem antenna also attached to roll barndash Real-time communication with ground station
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
MIT Run Results
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Typical Performance
bull Precise state determination ndash 2 - 5 cm position error ndash 1 - 2 cms velocity error ndash 1 - 2 degrees heading ndash 5 - 10 Hz
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Track Results -Slip Measurements
bull Car heading and
velocity vectors
not aligned
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Track Results -Slip Measurements
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Comparative Lap Results
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Acceleration vs Position
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
ldquoHuman Centeredrdquo InformationRequirements Analysis
bull Integrated Human Centered Systems Approachbull ldquoSemi-Structuredrdquo Decision Theorybull Driver Distraction Analysis
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Driving Task Definition
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Vehicle Operation Tasks
bull Vehicle control tasks [skill based]ndash Lateral control (steering)ndash Longitudinal control (accel braking)
bull Tactical decisions [rule based]ndash Maneuveringndash Systems management
bull Strategic decisions [knowledge based]ndash Route selectionndash Goal management
bull Monitoring [skill rule knowledge]ndash Situation awareness
[Rasmussen Skill Rule Knowledge Hierarchy]
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Lateral Tracking Loop
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Driver InputOutput Modes
Visual- External Scene - Forward - Roadway - Traffic - Lights - Signage - Environment - Peripheral - Rear- Internal - Instrument Cluster
TactileProprioceptive- Lateral Accel- Longitudinal Accel- Road Surface- Control Force Feedback- Vibration- Switch Feedback
Audio- Roadway- Alerts - Horns (ext) - ChimesClicks- Velocity (Wind)- Engine- Radio- Passenger
Olfactory- Gasoline- SmokeFire- Passenger
Other
Manual (Hand)- Wheel- Steering Column- Gear Shift- Switch (Panel)- Switch (Other)
Manual (Foot)- Throttle- Brake- Other
Voice
Other- Eye Tracking- Blink- Gesture- Thought
Driver
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
ldquoSituation Awarenessrdquo
bull Term originally defined for air combatbull Working Definition Sufficiently detailed mental picture of the
vehicle and environment (ie world model) to allow the operator to make well-informed (ie conditionally correct) decisions
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Driver Situation AwarenessComponents
PersonalFactors
EquipmentStatus
VehiclePerformance
ControlSettings
Passengers
Non-drivingElements
Internal
SituationAwareness
Weather
AdjacentEnvironment
Signage
RoadwaySurface
LocationRoute
AdjacentTraffic
External
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Endsley Situation Awareness Model
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Primary Task Analysis
DistractionPotential
DriverDriver
Everything Else(Secondary Tasks)
SecondarySystem
(eg cell phone)
VehicleOperation Task(Primary Task)
Vehicle
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Interaction Metaphors
bull Car as homebull Car as kitchenbull Car as bathroombull Car as bedroombull Car as music roombull Car as playroombull Car as entertainment ctrbull Car as toolboxbull Car as closet
bull Car as officebull Car as comm center
bull Car as image statementbull Car as clothingbull Car as jewelrybull Car as sports equipmentbull Car as safe spacebull Car as cocoon
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Trends in Driver Attentional Demand
Driv
er A
tten
tion
al D
emDr
iver
Att
enti
onal
Dem
and
and
VehicleVehicleOperation OperationOperation Operation
SecondarySecondaryTasks Tasks
TimeTime
Time Spent in Vehicles (US)Time Spent in Vehicles (US)- Average 350 hrsyrperson Average 350 hrsyrperson - 500 Million hrsweek- 500 Million hrsweek
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
76 of Drivers Report Activities HaveldquoCausedNearly Causedrdquo an Accident
TALKING ON CELLPHONE
TURNING TO SPEAK
USING COMPUTER
CIGARETTE ASHES
BREAKING UP FIGHTBETWEEN KIDS
SPILLING COFFEE
Source Opinion Research Corp Interviews Time5800 (N=1016)
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Concerns Regarding High SecondaryTask Loads
bull Growing Evidence and Public Perception of Safety Problem
bull Cell Phone use in USndash 115-120 Million Active Cell Phonesndash 50-70 Use in Vehiclesndash 39 of Drivers Using (Daylight Hours)
bull NE Journal of Medicine Estimatendash 4 fold increase in collision risk using cell phone
bull NHTSA Estimatesndash 12 Million Accidents (25-30) caused by Distracted
Driverbull Not limited to cell phones
bull Note These effects may be latent in normal operations and may only manifest in non-normal or emergency situations
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Typical Performance vs TaskLoad Curve
Per
form
ance
Task Load
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Distraction Components
bull Manualndash Inability or delay in operation of vehicle controlndash Hands occupied or out of position (cell phone)
bull Visualndash Head Down Problemsndash Visual Accommodationndash Visual Clutterndash Visual Compulsion
bull Cognitivendash Lack of cognitive engagement with primary Taskndash Latency in mental context shiftsndash Multi-tasking capabilitiesndash Prioritization
bull Emotionalbull High Individual Variability in Multi-Tasking Capability
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Distraction Data Sources
bull Controlled Experimentsndash Vary Secondary Task Load (Independent Variable)
bull Visualbull Cognitive
ndash Measurebull Performancebull Response to Disturbancebull Situation Awareness
ndash Need to Increase Task Loading to Saturationndash Need to Include Unanticipated Eventsndash Need Lowest Common Denominator Population
bull Field Datandash Event Recordersndash Cell Phone Triggered
bull Subjective Survey Data
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Controlled Experiment Issues (1)
bull Simulator Testingndash Controlled Scenarios +ndash Safe to go to Task Saturationndash Face and Cue Validity Issues ndashndash Simulator Sickness ndashndash Cost -
bull Dual Control Vehicle Testing (Test Track)ndash Good Validity +ndash Safety Issues at Task Saturation ndashndash Cost +
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Controlled Experiment Issues (2)
bull Variability in Primary and Secondary Taskingndash How do you measure Secondary Task Loadndash How do you control Secondary Task Load
bull Performance Measuresndash Trackingndash Reaction Timendash Side Task Performance
bull Subjective Workload Measuresbull Situation Awareness Measures
ndash Testable Response Method
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Simulator Studies of Driver CognitiveDistraction Caused by Cell Phone Use
bull Independent Variablesndash Cognitive Loadingndash Hands freeHands Fixed
bull Dependant Variablesndash Situation Awarenessndash Reaction Timendash Tracking MIT Age Lab Simulator
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Cognitive Loading Levels
bull Lowndash Small talk
bull bullMediumndash Discuss movieoperaballet plot-line
bull bullHighndash Edit document by phone
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Results Situational Awareness
bull Significant reduction in SA with Cell Phone Use
bull No significant difference between HFamp HH
Ave
rag
e F
ract
ion
Co
rrec
t
Normal HF HHPhone Setup
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Stop Sign Response Time Resultsby Age Group
bull Significant effect of Age
bull No significant effect of Cell Phone Use
Re
sp
on
se
Tim
e [
se
c]
Normal1
Normal2
HFSmall
HFMovie
HF Edit HHSmall
HHMovie
HH Edit
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit
bull Heads-Up Operationndash Parsing operating logicndash Glance Display Designs (lt 1 sec)ndash Tactile input devices
bull Voice Input-Outputndash not a Panacea
bull Prioritization Systemsndash Intelligent Situation Assessmentndash Interruption ldquoStand-byrdquo Architecture Example
bull Communicationsbull Information Systemsbull Non Critical Warnings
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
300-MIT Testbed
bull Collaborationndash MIT Media Lab CC++ndash Motorolandash DiamlerChrysler
bull Highly Instrumented Platformndash External Environmentndash Internal Environmentndash Vehicle Statesndash Driver Cognitive and Emotional States
bull Prototype Platformbull Platform - Chrysler 300M
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
ldquoStandbyrdquo System
Issue Criteria for automatic ldquoStandby Status
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
300M Experiment to DetermineIndicators of Driver ldquoBusyrdquo States
bull 20+ Subjects Drove Challenging Trajectory in Boston-Cambridge Area in 300M Instrumented Vehicle
bull Subjects indicated transitions between ldquoBusyrdquo and ldquonon-Busyrdquo States
bull Attempted Correlation with Observable States
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Example ldquoBusyrdquo State Data
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Good Correlation with Specific Locations
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Merge onto Major Roadway
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Complicated Intersection With Merging Traffic
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Rotary
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Parking Lot with Pedestrians
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Narrow Side Street
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Complex Urban Location ldquoHarvard Squarerdquo
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Weak Correlation with SimpleDynamic States
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Results Consistent With SubjectiveReporting of High Workload Tasks
bull Merge points
bull Pedestrians
bull Rotaries
bull Narrow Streets
bull Busy Intersections
bull Unfamiliar Locations
ndash Searching for Locations
bull Construction Zones
bull Poor Weather Conditions
bull Potential for Adaptive Learning Algorithims with Multi-Attribute Correlations
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Enhanced VisionSynthetic Vision
bull Goal is to increase safety and capacitybull Challenge is to ensure no adverse effects are created
Boeing is investigating these technologies including evaluating prototype systems on the 737 Technology Demonstrator in early 2002 While these technologies hold promisefor increasing safety and potentially improving airport capacity the designs must be approached carefully to ensure no harmful side effects are induced
Enhanced Vision Synthetic Vision
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Enhanced Vision
Picture of the outside world created by real-time weather and darkness penetrating on-board sensors (eg Cameras FLIR MMW radar and weather radar)
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash GPSndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
GPS Progressive RouteGuidance
bull Progressive Turn Guidancebull Current Limitations
ndash Complex Intersectionsndash Database Resolutionndash Database Structurendash CA Code Precisionndash Limited command set
bull Potential to degrade SAndash Dependencyndash Not robust to interruptionserrorsndash Head Downndash Lack of ldquoNaturalistic Interfacerdquo
bull Kamla Topsey amp Kate Zimmerman Expt
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Naturalistic Direction Study
bull 13 Subjects Directions categorizedbull Most common types
ndash Street names and route signs 26ndash Leftright turn indication 23ndash Distance by Reference point
bull Stoplights Stop signs 21bull Landmarks 11
bull Least common typesndash Distance by measurement 4ndash Heading 1
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
K2 Navigation System Prototype
bull No visual demand voice-basedbull Syntax
ndash Reference + Action + Target
bull Examplesndash ldquoAt the next light make a left onto the street betwe
en UNOrsquos Pizzeria and Fleet Bankrdquondash ldquoJust after the Star Market bear right onto Belmont
Strdquo
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Testing
bull Systems Map Carin K2bull Routes
ndash Start from MITndash Use 15 commandsndash All include a rotary
bull Subjectsndash 2 males 4 femalesndash 20-21 years oldndash 4-5 years driving experiencendash Unfamiliar with driving in Boston
area
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Results Navigation Errors
An error is defined as any deviation from the intended path
Map Carin K2
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Results Comparative Ratings
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Recently Developed Weather Datalink Products
ARNAV
Avidyne
BendixKing FAA FISDL
Control Vision
Digital Cyclone
Echo Flight
Garmin
UPS ndash AirCell
Vigyan
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision Syste
m)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architecture
sndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo
bull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Fundamental Tradeoff in AlertingDecisions
bull When to alertndash Too early 10487621048762Unnecessary Alert
bull Operator would have avoided hazard without alertbull Leads to distrust of system delayed response
ndash Too late 1048762 Missed Detectionbull Incident occurs even with the alerting systembull Must balance Unnecessary Alerts and Missed Detec
tions
Uncertaincurrent state Hazard
Un
cert
ain
Fu
ture
Tra
ject
ory
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
System Operating Characteristic Curve
Ideal Alerting System
Example Alerting
Threshold Locations
Pro
bab
ility
of
Suc
cess
ful A
lert
P(S
A)
Probability of UnnecessaryAlertP(FA)
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Kinematics
bull Alert time talert = (r - d)vtalert = 0 rarr braking must begin immediatelytalert = rarr alert is issued 1048762 seconds before braking is required
bull Determine P(UA) and P(SA) as function of talert
bull V = 35 mph in following example
Alert Issued
Vehicle
Total Braking Distance
ResponseLatency
Braking Distance
Hazard
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Case 1 Perfect Sensors
Deterministic probabilities are 0 or 1Ideal performance achievable for talert between 10 - 25 s
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Case 2 Add Sensor Uncertainty
Nearly ideal performance for talert between 145 - 175 s
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Example Response TimeDistribution
Lognormal distribution (mode = 107 s dispersion = 049) [Najm et al]
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Case 3 Add Response DelayUncertainty
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Case 4 Add DecelerationUncertainty
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Kinematics Sensors (eg RADAR) Limited byVehicle Dynamics and Response Time
Need Intent States
Courtesy of Prof Jim Kuchar MIT Dept of AeroAstro
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Intent States in the Lateral Tracking
External Environment
GoalSelection
RouteSelection
LaneLineSelection
LaneLineTracking Vehicle
Goal RouteDesired
LineSteering
CommandVehicleStates
StrategicFactors
HazardMonitoring
Threats
Disturbances
- Default- Open Loop- Optimized- Commanded- Prior History- Instructed- Wander
- Best Line- Lane Switching- Traffic- Speed
Wheel Position(force)
Acceleration
Velocity
Position
X = (Goal Subsequent Planned Trajectory Current Target State Acceleration Velocity Position)
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Intent Observability States
bull bull Roadwaybull Indicator Lights
ndash Break Lightsndash Turn Signalsndash Stop Lights
bull Acceleration Statesbull GPS Routingbull Head Positionbull Dynamic Historybull Tracking Behavior
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo System
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
ldquoMaster Cautionrdquo Architecture
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
300M Face Analysis
bull Driver Internal Statendash Vigilancendash Stress
bull Driver Habitsndash Scan Patterns
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
300M Pupil Tracking
IBM BlueEyes Camera
Image withOn-Axis LEDs off
Image withOn-Axis LEDs on
Difference Image
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Approaches to Enhancing Focus in theInformation Rich Cockpit (cont)
bull Enhanced Perceptionndash IRMMW Radar (eg Cadillac Night Vision System)ndash Multidimensional video (ldquosuper mirrorrdquo)ndash Prioritized audio
bull Situation Awareness Displaysndash Datalink
bull Alerting Systemsbull Advanced Internal Diagnostics Architectures
ndash ldquoMaster Cautionrdquobull Driver Condition Monitoringbull External Visual Systems
ndash Active Signage
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Discussion
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Aerospace Experiencebull Drive by Wire
ndash Criticality - Fault Tolerancebull B-777 example
bull Collision alert criteriandash Alert vs autobrake
bull F-16 examplendash Complex threat fieldndash False alarm issue
bull System Operations Curvesbull HUD applications
ndash Limited FOVbull Runway alignmentbull Gunsight applications
ndash Visual Accommodationbull Infinity Opticsbull Visual anomalies
ndash egLack of Fusionbull Situation Awareness (SA) displays
ndash Testing Methods
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Technology Migrating intoAutomobile Cockpits
bull Mobile Communications (Voice Data)bull Portable Devices (Cell Phone PDA Wireles
s)ndash Not Controlled by Automobile Industry
bull Entertainment Info Systems (CD Web)bull Navigation and Guidance (GPS DGPS)bull Advanced Displays (Flat Panel HUD)bull Sensors (Radar IR MEMS)bull Databus Architectures (CANAIRINC)bull On-board Processors (Embedded Auto-PC)bull Control augmentation (ABS Cruise C)bull
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Background Current Systems
bull Information Structurendash Distance to turnndash Street namesndash Heading
bull Interfacendash Moving mapsndash Iconsndash Voice instructions
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Current System Phillips Carin
bull Uses maps icons and voicecommands to guide the driver
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Direction Study Conclusions
bull Humans and navigation systems both use street name and direction of turn to describe the action
bull They differ in the method used to warn the driver of the upcoming actionndash Humans rely on external reference points la
ndmarks stoplightsndash Navigation systems use distance amp heading
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Data
bull Subjective feedbackndash Cooper-Harper rating scale evaluationndash Best amp worst features evaluationndash Comparative rating of systems
bull Observationsndash Errors comments body language
bull Measurementsndash Position velocity
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Error ExampleJamaica Pond Trajectory
Lo
ng
itu
de
Latitude
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Results System RatingsN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
sN
umbe
r of
Sub
ject
s
Rating
Rating
Rating
K2
Carin
Map
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Obstacle Collision AlertingSystem Example
bull Examine effect of design parameters on performancendash sensor accuracyndash operator responsendash braking deceleration
bull Performance shown using SOC curves
bull Monte Carlo simulation used to estimate probabilitiesndash v = 35 mph (56 kmhr)ndash Safety evaluation
bull Avoidance trajectory
ndash variable delay 16 fts2 deceleration (05 g)
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
False Alarm Estimation
bull Was an alert unnecessarybull What would have happened without the aler
tndash Require Nominal trajectoryndash Definition of false alarm is situation- and operato
r-specificndash Baseline
bull If collision would occur after
15 s delay 10 fts2 deceleration (13 g) then an alert is necessarybull Otherwise an alert is a false alarm
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Implications
bull A single decision threshold for all users will not be acceptablendash uncertainties in response time and braking dominatendash some users will experience apparent false alarmsndash some users will experience apparent late alarms
bull Automating the braking response could improve safetyndash less uncertainty in response delay and deceleration pr
ofilendash may still be prone to perceived false alarmsndash may encourage complacency over-reliance
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
What Will Ultimately ControlSecondary Task Levels
bull Market Forces tend to increase complexityndash Market Values functionally gtgt complexity
bull Industry Practicebull Regulatory Actionbull Litigationbull Insurancebull Public Awareness
bull Pressure for actionbull We donrsquot have sufficient data to support rational action
at this point
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Transportation Systems Level
bull Fleet managementndash Monitoringndash Dispatchndash Reportingndash Support
bull Personal vehicle managementndash Teenage driver monitoringndash Transponders ldquofast passrdquondash Enforcement
bull Passenger vehicle as part of distribution networkndash Low end e-commerce
bull Drive through pick-upndash Foodndash Retailndash Services
bull Active ride share matching
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Careful Formatting Turns Data IntoInformation
Information distinguished by
bull Location
bull Labeling
bull Shape coding
bull NOT color
To help pilots identify information
bull Consistent use of shading
bull Consistent use of color
Every pixel earns its way on the display
Formatting not color used to distinguish information hellipSurprising thing is NOT colorOriginally in the early days of CRTs we did not use color because one failure mode of the CRT is reversion to BampW But we liked the human factors benefit we received fromthe additional clarity so we kept the philosophy on the LCD We donrsquot use color as the only means to distinguish information Color helps the pilot locate information but not todistinguish itShading is also used to help pilots identify certain informationSo on these altitude tapes notice- Boeing tape does not use white outlines because they are not necessary- The box shape is as simple as possible- Gaps between numbers and lines are intentional to separate the information- color is used sparingly and consistentlyI have a couple slides on shadingAnd a couple slides on color
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
External Vision ndash AC 25773-1
bull Vision Polar
bull 3-Second ldquoRulerdquo
Alsobull Precipitation clearingbull Post widthsbull other details
Vision polar and 3 second ruledrive airplane configuration(approach attitude and speed)
VrefMax landing weightForward cg10 kt crosswind
Down-vision angle
1200rsquo Runway Visual Range
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Synthetic Vision
Picture of the outside world created by combining precise navigationposition with databases of comprehensive geographic cultural andtactical information
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
Chrysler 300M Research Platform
DaimlerChrysler
Motorola CC++ MIT
Cooperative
Effort
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-
CC++ 300M Driver StudyApply lab experience in Media and Human
Interface technologies
Build vehicle platform to develop and test driver behavior
Develop information workload managerIdentifyVehicleMotion
(stop turnaccel)
Location Aware(speed
position hellip)
Develop Tangible
Interfaces(transfer info
tohuman)
Chrysler 300M
Vehicle Thinks
Controls Flow of Information
(warnings phone etchellip)Monitor In-
vehicle
Situation
(mood cognitive load)
Identify Driver
Behavior and Stress
Level
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31
- Slide 32
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Slide 35
- Slide 36
- Slide 37
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Slide 43
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Slide 46
- Slide 47
- Slide 48
- Slide 49
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Slide 66
- Slide 67
- Slide 68
- Slide 69
- Slide 70
- Slide 71
- Slide 72
- Slide 73
- Slide 74
- Slide 75
- Slide 76
- Slide 77
- Slide 78
- Slide 79
- Slide 80
- Slide 81
- Slide 82
- Slide 83
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Slide 89
- Slide 90
- Slide 91
- Slide 92
- Slide 93
- Slide 94
- Slide 95
- Slide 96
- Slide 97
- Slide 98
- Slide 99
- Slide 100
- Slide 101
- Slide 102
- Slide 103
-