THE college ready promise Advisory Panel Meeting #4 May 2012
-
Upload
theophilus-stavros -
Category
Documents
-
view
24 -
download
0
description
Transcript of THE college ready promise Advisory Panel Meeting #4 May 2012
www.aspirepublicschools.org
THE COLLEGE READY PROMISE ADVISORY PANEL MEETING #4MAY 2012
“Having a high-quality teacher over four consecutive years could close the achievement gap.” – Daniel Fallon, Brookings Institute
2
We will:• Work to solve problems.• Honor all ideas and voices.• Do what we say we will do when we
say we will do it.• Have an “all for one, one for all”
attitude.• Show respect through punctuality
and active listening. (no cell phones/email)
Norms
Agenda
1. Survey Buzz & Quick Updates (10 mins)
2. SGP Cut Points & Determining Initial Effectiveness Level
(50 mins)
3. Career Path (20 mins)
4. Febreze & the Purple Planet (25 mins)
5. Closing & Survey (15 mins)
1. Panelists will share experience with student/peer surveys and learn TCRP updates.
2. Panelists will review and provide feedback on pending SGP and Effectiveness level policy decisions.
3. Panelists will review and provide feedback on draft of Career Path matrix.
4. Panelists will discuss “Cues and Rewards” to increase use of the PP.
5. Panelists complete survey.
Agenda: Objective:
04/20/2023 4
QUICK CHECK: Please list “+s” and “ ‘s” on the survey matrix provided.
What’s the Buzz? (5 min)
Survey +’s(What worked?)
‘s
(What should we change?)
Student
Peer
Parent
5
Quick Updates (5 mins)
Measure Teacher Input Where We Are
Formal Observations
Teammate survey requesting feedback on TCRP rubric. ANDEnd of year survey capturing feedback on all aspects of TCRP.
Using Teammate feedback to inform both rubric revisions and enhancements to the formal observation process.
Informal Observations
Mayra Vega, Godzilla Team member, is conducting teacher interviews to learn teacher preference for informal observation tools/processes.
Aspire’s i3 grant is focused on developing new tools for informal observations to improve frequency and effectiveness.
Surveys Your feedback today. We’ll incorporate your feedback and lessons learned to inform next year’s battery of surveys.
SGP On going Focus Groups for Non tested subjects. Your feedback today related to SGP Cut Points.
All feedback will be used to inform policy decisions made by the Senior Leadership Team.
TEACHERSUPPORTS!!!
Aspire Film Festival & AspirED Talks!
Ongoing film festival competition with IPAD or Iphone giveaway!
Agenda
1. Survey Buzz & Quick Updates (10 mins)
2. SGP Cut Points & Determining Initial Effectiveness Level
(50 mins)
3. Career Path (20 mins)
4. Febreze & the Purple Planet (25 mins)
5. Closing & Survey (15 mins)
1. Panelists will share experience with student/peer surveys and learn of newly launched PP supports.
2. Panelists will review and provide feedback on pending SGP and Effectiveness level policy decisions.
3. Panelists will review and provide feedback on draft of Career Path matrix.
4. Panelists will discuss “Cues and Rewards” to increase use of the PP.
5. Panelists complete survey.
Agenda: Objective:
7
Issue 1: SGP Cut Points
Individual(ELA, Math, Science &
History)
School-wide (Untested Teachers, K-
2, & Electives) Entering 0 - 24 NA
Emerging 25 – 39 0 – 39
Achieving 40 – 60 40 – 50
Highly Effective
61 – 74 51 – 65
Master 75 – 100 66 -100
Rationale:• Low Growth < 40• Moderate Growth 41-60• High Growth 61-100
8
Yearly Reporting:– Option A: “Pool” SGPs across subjects/grades– Option B: Allow teachers to choose their “highest” SGP
from subjects taught
Issue 2: A teacher’s annual median SGP
10
Reporting Multiple Years of SGP for Evaluation Purposes– Option A: “Pool” SGPs across subjects/grades from
multiple years– Option B: Allow teachers to choose their “highest” SGP
from prior 2 years
Issue 3: A teacher’s median SGP over multiple years
11
Issue 4: Formal Observation Cut Points
% of Ratings at Level 3 & 4
% of Ratings at Level 4
Entering <40%
Emerging 40%-69%
Achieving 70%-80%
Highly Effective
>80% <=50%
Master >80% >=50%
12
Below Meeting Exceeding
Formal Observation Below Meeting Exceeding
Individual SGP Below Meeting Exceeding
Informal Observation
Below Meeting Exceeding
Student Survey Below Meeting Exceeding
Peer Survey Below Meeting Exceeding
Parent Survey Below Meeting Exceeding
Individual SGP generated from CST results (2 years)
Issue 5: Overall Effectiveness Level
Determines initial
placement
Career Continuum Entering ~ Emerging ~ Achieving ~ Highly Effective ~ Master
13
RECOMMENDATION #4: Formal Observation Cut Points
% of Ratings* at Level 3 & 4
% of Ratings* at Level 4
Entering <40%
Emerging 40%-69%
Achieving 70%-80%
Highly Effective
>80% <=50%
Master >80% >=50%
* Based on % of 29 indicators rated as part of formal observation process.
14
How are SGP and Formal Observation scores combined to determine a teacher’s initial effectiveness level? (Fall 2013)
RECOMMENDATION #5: Overall Effectiveness Level
Overall Effectiveness Level
SGP Score Formal Observation
Score Entering Entering Entering
Emerging Emerging Emerging
Achieving Achieving Achieving
Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective
Master Master Master
NOTE: We’ll use informal observation, student, parent, and peer survey data to inform final placement on effectiveness scale.
15
How are SGP and Formal Observation scores combined to determine a teacher’s initial effectiveness level? (Fall 2013)
Overall Effectiveness Level
Overall Effectiveness Level
SGP Score Formal Observation
Score Entering Entering Entering
Emerging Emerging Emerging
Achieving Achieving Achieving
Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective
Master Master Master
NOTE: We’ll use informal observation, student, parent, and peer survey data to inform final placement on effectiveness scale.
16
How are SGP and Formal Observation scores combined to determine a teacher’s initial effectiveness level? (Fall 2013)
Overall Effectiveness Level
Overall Effectiveness Level
SGP Score Formal Observation
Score Entering Entering Entering
Emerging Emerging Emerging
Achieving Achieving Achieving
Highly Effective Highly Effective Highly Effective
Master Master Master
NOTE: We’ll use informal observation, student, parent, and peer survey data to inform final placement on effectiveness scale.
Agenda
1. Survey Buzz & Quick Updates (10 mins)
2. SGP Cut Points & Determining Initial Effectiveness Level
(50 mins)
3. Career Path (20 mins)
4. Febreze & the Purple Planet (25 mins)
5. Closing & Survey (15 mins)
1. Panelists will share experience with student/peer surveys and learn of newly launched PP supports.
2. Panelists will review and provide feedback on pending SGP and Effectiveness level policy decisions.
3. Panelists will review and provide feedback on draft of Career Path matrix.
4. Panelists will discuss “Cues and Rewards” to increase use of the Purple Planet.
5. Panelists complete survey.
Agenda: Objective:
TCRP Career PathResidents
Entering Teacher (first 2 years)
Induction Candidate
Emerging Teacher
Induction Candidate
Aspire Presenting Teacher
Summer Training Facilitating Teacher
FBAR
Achieving Teacher
Aspire Presenting Teacher
Summer Training Facilitating Teacher
FBAR Induction Coach
Leaders Lead Presenter
Relocating Teacher (Focus Schools)
Lead Teacher (Not recommended up to Principal discretion)
Highly Effective Teacher
Aspire Presenting Teacher
Summer Training Facilitating Teacher
FBAR Induction Coach
Leaders Lead Presenter
Relocating Teacher (Focus Schools)
Lead Teacher
National Board Certified (n/a)
Model Teacher
Mentor Teacher
Master Teacher
Aspire Presenting Teacher
Summer Training Facilitating Teacher
FBAR Induction Coach
Leaders Lead Presenter
Relocating Teacher (Focus Schools)
Lead Teacher
National Board Certified (n/a)
Model Teacher
Mentor Teacher
21
Think: What is your reaction to
the TCRP Career Path matrix?
Jot: Write down glows, concerns,
or questions.
Round Robin Share: Taking
turns, share one idea that you
wrote down. Continue sharing
until time runs out.
Round Robin Share
22
• Opportunities to see other schools/districts• Formal team teaching & learning• Self-directed professional development budget • Participation in a network-wide Master Teacher Cohort • Opportunities to observe high performing schools and teachers
regionally or nationally • Preferred access to special PD experiences• Special luncheon • Teach Plus• Hope Street Group Fellow• America Achieves Education Champions Fellow• Student Achievement Partner Fellow
Other Options?
Agenda
1. Survey Buzz & Quick Updates (10 mins)
2. SGP Cut Points & Determining Initial Effectiveness Level
(50 mins)
3. Career Path (20 mins)
4. Febreze & the Purple Planet (25 mins)
5. Closing & Survey (15 mins)
1. Panelists will share experience with student/peer surveys and learn of newly launched PP supports.
2. Panelists will review and provide feedback on pending SGP and Effectiveness level policy decisions.
3. Panelists will review and provide feedback on draft of Career Path matrix.
4. Panelists will discuss “Cues and Rewards” to increase use of the PP.
5. Panelists complete survey.
Agenda: Objective:
1. Teachers and Principals and Coaches have asked (rightly so) that we make sure that TCRP is not just evaluation and feedback tools but support tools too.
2. We thought up the “Purple Planet” (originally the staircase) and found Jason Lange who happened to be dreaming up his first company.
3. Though it’s taken longer than we hoped, we will roll it out this summer.
4. Now we are terrified nobody will use it(!)
The Problem
27
• The “New York Times” did an article on Target and market research
• It’s largely an article about figuring out why people form habits when they form them
• One part of the story is about Febreze…
The Story
29
So the marketers went into the field to figure out why
And they learned that most people with pets and cigarettes didn’t notice the smells
But nobody was buying it
30
Who actually were buying Febreze…
And asked, “When do you us it?” (trying to understand their habit)
So then they studied people
31
Cue: When do I do that habit (use Febreze)?
“I use it after cleaning a room – I just spritz it a few times to make the room smell nice.”
Reward? Why do I do that (use Febreze)?
“It’s like a little celebration – Yea, I am done cleaning that room!”
(like checking things off your to do list – so little but so pleasurable somehow!)
They found a pattern:
32
Two questions:
If habits are easier to form (or break!) when we know the cues and identify the rewards we think we are getting from them, then:
a. What would help us develop more “smart habits” or “effective teaching moves” in our classrooms? (BIG -- for later conversation)
b. What would help us begin to use the Purple Planet and get the support we think they’ll find there? (Smaller -- for now)
So what is the connection to us?
CUES
WHEN would you use Purple Planet:• Right after formal?• Right before informal?• Right before PLP?• Right after PLP?• During team time?• During staff meeting time?• In 1:1 with coach or Lead or
colleague or…?• After you figured out how to be
really good at something might you log on to share what you figured out?
REWARDS
WHAT would feel like a reward?• Some message from a
colleague or your principal or coach or…
• Some image or graph showing your progress or…?
Questions to consider
Agenda
1. Survey Buzz & Quick Updates (10 mins)
2. SGP Cut Points & Determining Initial Effectiveness Level
(50 mins)
3. Career Path (20 mins)
4. Febreze & the Purple Planet (25 mins)
5. Closing & Survey (15 mins)
1. Panelists will share experience with student/peer surveys and learn of newly launched PP supports.
2. Panelists will review and provide feedback on pending SGP and Effectiveness level policy decisions.
3. Panelists will review and provide feedback on draft of Career Path matrix.
4. Panelists will discuss “Cues and Rewards” to increase use of the PP.
5. Panelists complete survey.
Agenda: Objective: