The Changing World of Natural Gas – A New Vision for North America
description
Transcript of The Changing World of Natural Gas – A New Vision for North America
DI SPUTES & I NVEST I G ATI ONS • ECONO MI CS • F I NANCI AL ADVI SORY • MANAGEMENT CONSULT I NG
©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy.
April 17, 2013
The Changing World of Natural Gas – A New Vision for North America
LNG 17George R. Brown Convention Center1001 Avenida de las AmericasHouston, Texas 77010
2©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Important Notice
This presentation was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. exclusively for the benefit
and internal use of the LNG 17 and its attendees at the George R. Brown Convention
Center on April 18, 2013. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for
distribution without prior written approval from Navigant. This presentation is incomplete
without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with the presentation
provided by Navigant.
April 18, 2013
©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Navigant is not a certified public accounting firm and does not provide audit, attest, or public accounting services. See www.navigantconsulting.com/licensing for a complete listing of private investigator licenses. Investment banking, private placement, merger, acquisition and divestiture services offered through Navigant Capital Advisors, LLC., Member FINRA/SIPC.
3©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Navigant’s Global Geographical Presence
Navigant Overview
SacramentoSan Francisco
Los Angeles
Phoenix
Dallas
Austin
Houston
Nashville
Atlanta
Tampa
Chicago
Toronto BurlingtonBoston
Westbury
LawrencevillePhiladelphia
Pittsburgh
ViennaReston
Denver
Detroit
Seattle
Palo Alto
Minneapolis
New York
St. Louis
Fairfield
Ottawa
Irvine
Miami
Rochester
PragueLondon
Hong Kong
ShanghaiBeijing
Washington, DC
Legend
Office includes Energy PracticeOffice includes other practices
Baltimor
e
Montreal
Quebec City
Boulder
4©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Company Overview
Navigant is a Global Consulting Firm Providing Services in the Energy, Construction, Healthcare and Financial Industries.
North American Dispute &
» Publicly traded since 1996 (NYSE: NCI)» Combination of technical skills and deep industry
knowledge» Large engagement capability – more than 2,500
employees in 40 principal offices globally» 2012 revenues of $844 million» Nationwide platform, international presence» Independent – rigorously objective; no audit opinions
to defend
Management Consulting
EnergyConstruction
Financial ServicesPublic Service
International Consulting – Energy
International ArbitrationCommercial Arbitration
HealthcareOutsourced Claims Services
Economic Consulting
Antitrust & Competition
Analysis
Securities
Labor
Valuation and M&A
Forensic & Accounting Investigations
Commercial Litigation / Intellectual
Property
Financial Advisory
Navigant Capital Advisors – US
Navigant Capital Markets Advisors
– Europe
Valuation and Financial Risk
Management - US
Valuation Services - Europe
Disputes and Investigations
Discovery Services
Disputes
Forensic Accounting
Global Investigations and Compliance
5©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
According to the EIA, U.S. Annual Average Natural Gas Production at the End of 2012 Was at its All Time High, Exceeding the Previous High of 21.7 in 1973 by 2.3 Tcf.
U.S. Historical Annual Average Dry Gas Production
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
26,000
Bcf
21.7 Tcf
24.0 Tcf
1930 1960 19900
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Bcf
Source: EIA/ Navigant
Source: EIA/ Navigant
6©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Abundant Natural Gas has Changed the Vision of the North American Energy Future.
N.A. Shale Map
Source: EIA
7©2011 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
U.S. Natural Gas » Supply Assessment
In Navigant’s North American Natural Gas Supply Assessment Released In July 2008, we first indicated what was to come.
8©2011 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Industry/Governmental Associations Have Confirmed What Navigant First Identified Years Ago (in 2008).
• In our “North American Natural Gas Supply Assessment” we estimated U.S. natural gas resources at over 2,200 Tcf, driven significantly by shale gas resources (842 Tcf) becoming technically recoverable, as well as simply being recognized. At current consumption rates, that is more than 90 years of supply.
• Last week, the Potential Gas Committee estimated U.S. potential future natural gas supply is almost 2,700 Tcf (mean) (based on 2,384 Tcf of potential resources plus 305 Tcf of proved reserves), or more than 110 years of supply at current consumption rates. The PGC’s latest increase is driven by a more than 50% increase in its shale gas resource estimate, from 687 Tcf (2010) to 1073 Tcf in two years, to more than double EIA’s current estimate of 482 Tcf.
Shale Abundance Confirmed
Source: Potential Gas Committee / Colorado School of Mines Report, 4/9/13
9©2011 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
U.S. Natural Gas » U.S. Gas Shale Production
In 2012 US shale production was up to over 28 Bcf per day – shale making up 43% of a 65 Bcfd US gas market.
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
5
10
15
20
25
30
0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.2 2.9
5.5
7.9
10.6
16.0
23.3
28.2
Bcfd
10©2011 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
US Shale Gas Production is Furthermore Expected to Continue to Increase Over the Long Term
U.S. Natural Gas » U.S. Gas Shale Production
Source: Navigant’s North American Natural Gas Market Outlook, Fall 2012
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Woodford
Utica
Fayetteville
Barnett
Eagle Ford
Haynesville
Marcellus
11©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Comparative U.S. Oil vs Gas
Horizontal Gas Rig Counts Fell Significantly in 2012. A Potential Risk Factor.
Jan-0
8
Jul-0
8
Jan-0
9
Jul-0
9
Jan-1
0
Jul-1
0
Jan-1
1
Jul-1
1
Jan-1
2
Jul-1
2
Jan-1
30
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
U.S. Rig Count Split
GAS HORZ Gas DIR GAS VERT OIL
Co
un
t
Sources: Navigant / Schlumberger
Oil Rigs Exceed
Gas Rigs
12©2011 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
US Gas Prices Have Responded to Supply Abundance
Natural Gas Prices
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
$10.00Historical Monthly Average Henry Hub Gas Price
$/M
MB
tu
2008
Pre-Shale Revolution
Shale Revolution
13©2011 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Gas Prices Have Plummeted From Prices of Over $13 per MMBtu in August 2008 to $2.03 per MMBtu at Henry Hub in May 2012, Before Returning to Current Prices (4/9/13) for May 2013 contracts of $4.02 per MMBtu for Henry Hub Natural Gas and $94.20 ($16.17 per MMBtu) for WTI Oil—An Oil Price About 4X the Gas Price per MMBtu Equivalent.
Gas Price Changes
Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$0
$4
$8
$12
$16
$20
Average Monthly Natural Gas and Crude Oil Prices
Sumas AECO-C Henry Hub
$/M
MB
tu
WT
I ($
/MM
Btu
)
Sources: Navigant/Platts
14©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Navigant’s U.S. Forecast Gas Shale Production to 2020
Despite Recent Switching to Oil Directed Drilling, Navigant Expects Strong Gas Shale Production Growth to Continue - To a 57% Share of Total Production by 2020 – From 7% in 2006 – in Only 15 Years.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
U.S. Dry Production by Type
Bcfd
Shale
Conventional7% Shale93% Conven-tional
57% Shale43% Conven-tional
Source: Navigant’s North American Natural Gas Outlook, Fall 2012
15©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
» So as we’ve seen, the dramatic increase in domestic gas shale has had significant fundamental consequences on the North American gas market over the last 5 years.
» The new ‘manufacturing model’ of gas shale production has reformed gas pricing and may assure low gas prices for the long term.
The Gas Game Has Changed Over the Last Five Years.
The Gas Story Ahead
Source: Navigant’s North American Natural Gas Outlook, Fall 2012
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00Monthly Prices
Oneok, Okla Kern River, Opal plant
SoCal Gas Carthage Hub
Dominion, South Point PG&E City-Gate
TCPL Alberta, AECO-C Henry Hub
Real$
/MM
Btu
16©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
The New Paradigm – LNG Exports from North America?
Source: Canadian National Energy Board
» Gas shale potential is situated across North America, including Canada, which has three approved projects at Kitimat, BC.
» Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass announced sale to its 6th major customer (Centrica) in March 2013 , following announced sales to BG, Gas Natural Fenosa, Korea Gas, GAIL, and to Total. The facility is likely to be the first US LNG export project on-line, in 2015.
» Currently, 17 major U.S. (2 West Coast, 2 East Coast, 13 Gulf) and 3 Canadian projects with combined capacity of about 35 Bcfd are going through the export and construction approval process.
» Not all projects are likely to go ahead.
LNG Exports
17©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
North American LNG Exports—Approximately 30 Bcfd at DOE and 5 Bcfd at NEB Filed or Approved
Navigant has assisted in analysis for 8 out of 17 US LNG export projects (highlighted)
13
123
46 5 7
8
9
11
12
14
1013151617
No. Project Location Capacity (Bcfd) Project Sponsor Regulatory Status
1 Kitimat, BC 0.75 / 1.5 Apache Canada Ltd. Approved by NEB
2 Douglas Island, BC 0.23 BC LNG Export Cooperative Approved by NEB
3 Kitimat, BC 3.4 Shell / Mitsubishi / Mitsui Approved w/ NEB
4 Cameron Parish, LA 2.2 (+.52) Cheniere - Sabine Pass LNG DOE Non-FTA Approved, FERC Approved (4 Trains)
5 Freeport, TX 2.8 Freeport LNG (2) Filed w/ DOE
6 Corpus Christi, TX 2.1 Cheniere - Corpus Christi LNG Filed w/ DOE
7 Lake Charles, LA 2.0 Southern Union Filed w/ DOE
8 Cove Point, MD 1.0 Dominion - Cove Point LNG Filed w/ DOE
9 Coos Bay, OR 1.2 FTA/0.8 non-FTA Jordan Cove Energy Project Filed w/ DOE
10 Hackberry, LA 1.7 Sempra - Cameron LNG Filed w/ DOE
11 Brownsville, TX 2.8 Gulf Coast LNG Export LLC Filed w/ DOE
12 Warrenton, OR 1.25 Oregon LNG Filed w/DOE
13 Pascagoula, MS 1.5 Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC Filed w/DOE
14 Elba Island, GA 0.5 Southern LNG Company Filed w/DOE
15 Calhoun County, TX 1.38 Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions I, LLC Filed w/DOE
16 Sabine Pass, TX 2.6 Golden Pass Products LLC Filed w/DOE
17 Offshore LA 3.22 Main Pass Energy Hub, LLC Filed w/DOE (FTA)
18 Plaquemines Parish, LA 1.07 CE FLNG, LLC Filed w/DOE
19 Lake Charles, LA 0.54 Magnolia LNG Filed w/DOE (FTA)
20 Corpus Christi, TX 1.09 Pangea LNG Filed w/DOE (FTA)
1819 20
18©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
North American West Coast
LNG Export Assumptions
No. Project Location Capacity (Bcfd) Project Sponsor Regulatory Status
1 Kitimat, BC 0.75 / 1.5 Apache Canada Ltd. Approved by NEB2 Douglas Island, BC 0.23 BC LNG Export Cooperative Approved by NEB3 Kitimat, BC 3.4 Shell Approved by NEB
9 Coos Bay, OR 1.2 FTA; 0.8 non-FTA Jordan Cove Energy Project Filed w/ DOE
12 Warrenton, OR 1.25 Oregon LNG Filed w/DOE Valdez, Alaska 2.5 Exxon TCPL Conoco PotentialKitimat, BC TBA Alta Gas/Idemitsu Kosan PotentialPrince Rupert, BC 3.0 Progress Energy/Petronas PotentialPrince Rupert, BC TBA BG PotentialPrince Rupert, BC TBA Nexen, INPEX PotentialPrince Rupert, BC TBA SK E&S (Korea) PotentialPrince Rupert, BC TBA Woodside (Australia) PotentialPrince Rupert, BC TBA Imperial/Exxon Potential
19©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
US East Coast
LNG Export Assumptions
No. Project Location Capacity (Bcfd) Project Sponsor Regulatory Status
8 Cove Point, MD 1.0 Dominion - Cove Point LNG Filed w/ DOE14 Elba Island, GA 0.5 Southern LNG Company Filed w/DOE
20©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Gulf Coast
LNG Export Assumptions
No. Project Location Capacity (Bcfd)
Project Sponsor Regulatory Status
4 Cameron Parish, LA 2.2 Cheniere - Sabine Pass LNGDOE Non-FTA Approved, FERC Approved
5 Freeport, TX 2.8 Freeport LNG (2) Filed w/ DOE6 Corpus Christi, TX 1.8 Cheniere - Corpus Christi LNG Filed w/ DOE7 Lake Charles, LA 2.0 Southern Union Filed w/ DOE
10 Hackberry, LA 1.7 Sempra - Cameron LNG Filed w/ DOE11 Brownsville, TX 2.8 Gulf Coast LNG Export LLC Filed w/ DOE13 Pascagoula, MS 1.5 Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC Filed w/DOE 15 Calhoun County, TX 1.38 Excelerate Liquefaction Solutions I, LLC Filed w/DOE16 Sabine Pass, TX 2.6 Golden Pass Products LLC Filed w/DOE (FTA)17 Offshore LA 3.22 Main Pass Energy Hub, LLC Filed w/DOE (FTA)18 Plaquemines Parish, LA 1.07 CE FLNG, LLC Filed w/DOE19 Cameron Perish, LA 0.16 Waller Point LNG Filed w/DOE (FTA)20 Corpus Christi, TX 1.09 Pangea LNG Filed w/DOE (FTA)
21©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Impact of U.S. LNG Exports to Domestic Gas PricesImpact of U.S. LNG Exports to Domestic Gas Prices
Navigant Has Found That U.S. LNG Exports Will Lead to Less Than a 10 Percent Increase in Henry Hub Prices Across All Projects Studied*. Such Price Increases Are Small in Comparison to Historical and Forecast Intrinsic Gas Price Volatility.
• In addition, percentage impacts are even less when compared to delivered gas prices. For example, the percentage increase versus Northwest Natural’s residential rate ($11.93/MMBtu) is closer to 1-2%.* Caution should be taken in reviewing the published results from multiple projects. (1) Due to the differences in the
underlying assumptions, forecasted price responses from different projects should not be directly compared. (2) Most listed LNG export projects are currently under regulatory review. It is unlikely that all projects will be approved. Navigant projects that the total U.S. LNG exports by 2020 will be in the range of 5-6 Bcfd. (3) Price increments from multiple LNG export projects should not be considered as additive.
Sabine Pass
Lake Charles
Corpus Christi
Cove Point
Jordan Cove
Oregon LNG
Gulf LNG
Southern LNG
HH Histor-
ical Volatil-
ity 2000-
12
HH Fore-casted Volatil-
ity 2012-
35
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%Increase of Henry Hub Prices in Response to LNG
Export Projects
2020 2025 2030 2035
22©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Constraining Factors include:
» Proliferation of emerging gas shale resources around the world, including large resources in many countries in Europe and in the Asian Pacific region.
» Existence of plentiful gas supply and LNG resources in Qatar and Australia. In Qatar, gas is produced at very low or zero cost due to value of being associated with high value oil production.
» Limited likely impact of the Panama canal expansion due to passage rates tied to arbitrage value of commodity going through the canal.
» Possible de-linkage of international LNG prices to oil over the long term, diminishing the market value of LNG exports.
In the End, the Development of LNG Export Projects in the U.S. Will Be Constrained by a Number of Factors, Mostly Linked to International Competition.
Not All LNG Export Projects Will Materialize
All things considered, Navigant estimates that total U.S. LNG exports will ultimately be in the range of 5-6 Bcfd, spread widely around the country and serving both Atlantic and Pacific basins--about 7% -9% of US gas demand at 70 Bcfd.
23©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy. E N E R G Y
Implications and Challenges of U.S. LNG Exports
» LNG exports appear to offer a ‘solution’ to the current demand-constrained North American gas market, which is in need of sustainable markets to support supply abundance, thus fostering U.S. energy security.
» LNG exports would also provide: • economic benefits to the local region through job creation and to the
national economy through balance of trade and GDP enhancements,• environmental and climate change benefits (lower global GHG emissions),
and • a free market-solution to market needs, continuing the fundamental tenets
of free trade and market competition as key policies for the U.S., which has itself imported natural gas for many years.
» However, North American LNG export opportunities are not assured to last forever. The global natural gas and energy market is subject rapid change, and opportunities in the face of competitive developments may be fleeting. The challenge for LNG is to be able to seize the opportunity available now (by completing licensing, contracting, financing and permitting) and so by providing significant benefits to the U.S. and the U.S. natural gas market.
Implications and Challenges Ahead for North American LNG Exports
KeyC O N T A C T S
©2010 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy.
KeyC O N T A C T S
©2010 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy.
KeyC O N T A C T S
©2010 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy.
KeyC O N T A C T S
©2012 Navigant Consulting, Inc. Confidential and proprietary. Do not distribute or copy.
24
E N E R G Y
Gordon Pickering | DirectorRancho Cordova, CA [email protected] direct
Gordon Pickering | DirectorRancho Cordova, CA [email protected] direct
Rick Smead | DirectorHouston, Texas [email protected] direct
Rick Smead | DirectorHouston, Texas [email protected] direct