The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

44
The Case for Smoke-Free Housing Smoke-Free Housing Is… Good for Business Good for Health

description

The Case for Smoke-Free Housing. Smoke-Free Housing Is… Good for Business Good for Health. You Are Not Alone. In Colorado, thousands of multiunit residential buildings prohibit smoking anywhere inside and near buildings and/or the entire grounds including: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Page 1: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Smoke-Free Housing Is…

Good for Business

Good for Health

Page 2: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

You Are Not Alone

In Colorado, thousands of multiunit residential buildings prohibit smoking anywhere inside and near buildings and/or the entire grounds including:

3,500+ buildings with 83,500 units.

700+ buildings managed by 33 housing authorities.

2

Page 3: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Colorado NAHRO

“Housing authorities in Colorado have found that implementing smoke-free policies in affordable housing makes good health and business sense for the residents and staff, helps retain residents, and reduces the maintenance and other operational costs.”

David Martens, Service Officer, Colorado NAHRO (National Association of Housing & Redevelopment Officials)

3

In 2009 the Fort Collins Housing Authority implemented a policy covering 86 buildings.

Page 4: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Cornerstone Apartment Services

“The decision to institute no-smoking policies in the 90 Denver apartment buildings Cornerstone manages has been one of the best decisions I have made over the last 15 years. It has significantly reduced maintenance, repair and turnover costs. Furthermore, residents and staff love it.”

Jim Lorenzen, President

4

One of the 60-unit apartments managed by

Cornerstone.

Page 5: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Save on Maintenance

Reduce the costs of cleaning and repairing carpets, furniture, fixtures, window treatments, priming and painting walls, and general maintenance.

Lower utility bills and decrease the use of air-treatment systems — 30% less according to estimates by Marriott Hotels.

5

Page 6: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Smoking Damage Costs

6

Reported costs for damagecaused by smoking

$4,500 to $8,000 normal damage

$6,000 to $ 12,000 more extensive damage

Normal turnover costs

$500-2000

American Lung Association in Colorado study 2014-2015 of four housing authorities and one affordable living community

Page 7: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Other Savings & Benefits

Fire risks and fire damage are reduced.

Lower insurance premiums may be possible, negotiate with your insurance provider.

Improves property values because there is less damage caused by smoking and discarded cigarettes.

7

Page 8: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

The Impact of Residential Fires

Cigarettes cause an average of 4% of all residential fires in Colorado.

In 2010 residential fires caused 36% of all residential fire fatalities, 14% of residential fire injuries, and 7% of all residential property loss.

Colorado State Fire Chiefs Association

8

Page 9: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Additional Benefits

Spend less time dealing with smoking-related complaints.

Protect the health of your residents and workers — including staff and maintenance.

Obtain a free listing at mysmokefreehousing.com.

9

Page 10: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

The Smoke-Free Advantage

“While we have certainly seen some exciting market opportunities for businesses over the years, we rarely see such obvious ones. Frankly, if a private property-management firm had conducted this research, it might be tempted to keep the findings confidential to gain an initial competitive advantage.”

Campbell DeLong Resources, Inc.Portland, Oregon

10

Page 11: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Marketing Niche

85% of adults in Colorado do not smoke.

87% of Colorado households report having no-smoking rules.

Surveys conducted throughout Colorado indicate that most residents, including low-income populations, would prefer living in a nonsmoking building.

11

Page 12: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Pre-Policy Resident Support for No-Smoking Policies 2008-

2009

66% — Boulder County Housing Authority

65% — Lakewood’s Eaton Terrace Senior Residences

64% — Longmont’s Inn Between families

70.5% — Salida’s Mount Shavano Manor

62% — Alamosa Housing Authority

12

Page 13: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Delta Housing Authority Resident Support 2012

Before the no-smoking policy was implemented 74% support

Six months after the implementation

71% happy with the no-smoking policy.

83% had seen signs.

Smoking complaints down (88% reported none).

83% smoking less, 30% due to the policy.

11% quit smoking due to the policy.13

Page 14: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Support For Existing Policies 2009-2015

14

92% of the residents of the Boulder County and Fort Collins Housing Authorities

Page 15: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Happy Renters Stay Longer

Coloradans are used to smoke-free workplaces, restaurants, bars, and public places. They expect clean indoor air in their dwellings too.

Most residents do not want to continue to suffer the health consequences of breathing secondhand smoke when it drifts into their residences.

15

Page 16: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

A Market Advantage

Those who prefer to smoke inside their units are a significantly smaller percentage than those who prefer to live in a no-smoking residence.

16

Page 17: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Village at the Buffs

“When I initiated the no-smoking policy, no residents complained and no one moved out. Since then, our waiting list has grown.”Monica Slamkowski,Community Administrator

17

The Buffs is a 51-unit Section Property that implemented a no-smoking policy in February 2007.

Page 18: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

People Who Implement No-Smoking Policies Never Go Back

“Not one of the housing providers who prohibits smoking regrets doing so and none are considering going back to allowing smoking in any unit where it has been prohibited. Many said that once they tried it in one property, they quickly wanted it in all.”

Campbell DeLong Resources, Inc.Portland, Oregon

18

Page 19: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Are No-Smoking Policies Legal?

Colorado’s Clean Indoor Air Act prohibits smoking in all indoor common areas and specifically allows housing providers to prohibit tobacco and/or marijuana smoking in all or any part of their property, both indoors and outdoors.

There is no legal or constitutional right to smoke tobacco or marijuana.

No-smoking policies are not discriminatory and do not violate fair-housing regulations. People who smoke are not a protected class according to federal or state law. 19

Page 20: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

What is HUD’s Policy?

HUD allows and encourages the implementation of 100% no-smoking policies in public and federally subsidized housing

PIH notices 2012-25 and 2012-22.

20

A HUD tool kit for managers.

Page 21: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Protecting the Public Health

Each year in the U.S. secondhand smoke causes disease and nearly 50,000 deaths from heart disease, lung cancer, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), among others.

The 2014 U.S. Surgeon General’s Report states that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke.

More than 54% of Colorado adults who live in multiunit housing report smoke drifting into their apartment.

21

Page 22: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

The Science is Clear

“The scientific evidence is now indisputable: secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death in children and nonsmoking adults.”

22

Former U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona, 2006

Page 23: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Chemicals in Secondhand Smoke

23

Page 24: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Marijuana and E-Cigarette Smoke

Electronic (or e-cigarettes) emit secondhand aerosols with harmful chemicals that are harmful to health like benzene, formaldehyde, isoprene, nicotine, n-Nitrosonornicotine, and toluene.

Secondhand smoke from marijuana can cause lung irritation, asthma attacks, and higher risk for respiratory infections. Exposure to the chemicals in secondhand smoke have been linked to lung cancer. 24

Page 25: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Is Ventilation an Option?

Secondhand smoke cannot be controlled using ventilation or air-cleaning systems.

Up to 50% of the air in multiunit housing may be re-circulated throughout an entire building.

25

Page 26: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

ASHRAE on Ventilation

“At present, the only means of effectively eliminating the health risk associated with indoor exposure is to ban smoking activity.”

“No cleaning, ventilation or air-cleaning technologies …control health risks from environmental tobacco smoke exposure in spaces where smoking occurs.”

26

The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) sets the industry standards for ventilation.

Page 27: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Implementation Steps

Make sure the policy covers all types of smoking, including tobacco, marijuana, electronic cigarettes and other forms of “vaporizing.”

Involve residents in the process and determine their opinions and needs through surveys before and after implementation.

Seek advice from other housing providers who have no-smoking policies.

27

Page 28: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Communication Tools

Communicate the policy terms, effective date, and consequence of violations through meetings, in person, and in writing with signatures of all parties.

Educate residents about the health dangers of secondhand smoke and how smoking increases fire risk.

Set up an enforcement protocol with management, staff, and contractors.

28

Consult an attorney to draft a policy that works for you and complies with local and state laws.

Page 29: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Additional Steps

29

Provide stop-smoking resources like the Colorado Quitline at 1-800-QUIT-NOW, tobaccofreeco.org or coquitmobile.org.

Select a uniform effective date and a phase-in period as short as three to six months, but no more than a year.

Do not use grandfather exemptions as these cause resident confusion and frustration, distrust of management; and these restrict how you may advertise and enforce the policy until the policy is fully in effect.

Page 30: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

The Most Effective Policies

Smoking should be prohibited:

In all indoor areas and units.

On balconies, patios, and porches.

At all outdoor common areas.

At least 25 feet away from any part of a building. 30

Page 31: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

No-Smoking or Smoke-Free?

Using “no-smoking” or “nonsmoking” is more appropriate to describe a policy if smoking is allowed on balconies, patios, porches or in designated areas on the property.

Why? Residents and staff may still be exposed to secondhand smoke which could lead to fair-housing or other legal complaints.

31

Page 32: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Smoke-Free Momentum

Using “smoke-free” is appropriate if smoking is prohibited everywhere on the property.

The number of smoke-free listings at mysmokefreehousing.com has increased significantly in the last three years.

Useful for LEEDs or green point credits.

Easier to enforce and reduces complaints.

32

Page 33: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Some Smoke-Free Properties

630 apartment buildings, condominiums, senior communities, Section 8 and public housing.*

All properties managed by Shea and McWhinney.

The Carbondale Housing Authority.

* Based on listings at mysmokefreehousing.com33

AMLI at Inverness in Englewood is a 309-unit community that has been 100% smoke-free since July 2008.

Page 34: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Compliance Tools

• Communicate the policy to prospective residents, employees, and visitors on a continual basis. Use signage, newsletters and advertising. Be clear that both guests and staff need to follow the policy.

Visit the property frequently to observe compliance and establish a protocol for dealing with violations.

34

Page 35: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Obtaining Compliance

Document and investigate complaints promptly and take action to ensure compliance.

Offer residents a safe and anonymous way to report violations.

Maintain good sign placement throughout the property such as the international no-smoking symbol

Thank your staff, managers, and residents for their cooperation and help.

35

Page 36: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Talking Points for Residents

The Indoor air quality will be healthier for everybody and protects everyone from the exposure to secondhand smoke.

Safety — lower fire risks for residents and families.

Everybody is welcome — people who smoke are welcome but will have to step outside and away from the building to smoke.

Less building damage and maintenance — may help management keep rental rates stable.

Respect for your neighbors — smoke has no boundaries and can travel between units. 36

Page 37: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Condominiums

Review the governing documents.

Educate the homeowners association’s board and make a proposal.

A percentage of the owners may have to vote and approve any rule changes.

Make changes to the governing documents and file them with the appropriate governing body.

37

Page 38: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Free No-Smoking Signs

38

http://www.cohealthresources.orgwww.gaspforair.org

Page 39: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Free Guide for Housing Providers

The 2014 Colorado Guide to Establishing No-Smoking Policies in Multiunit Housing.

Obtain free copies at ordertheguide.org or call GASP at 303-444-9799.

Download at mysmokefreehousing.org.

39

Page 40: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Impact and Insights

40

Now available:

Findings from an18-month study provides some important insights for housing providers on the benefits of smoke-free policies, implementation and enforcement techniques, and heads of household opinions.

Page 41: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

MySmokeFreeHousing.org

All Your Smoke-Free Housing Resources Under One Roof

Tips on how to implement a policy.

Sample leases and resident surveys.

HUD toolkits and memos.

Enforcement tips, free signage, other web resources.

Secondhand smoke information for tobacco and marijuana smoke, and electronic cigarette vapors . 41

Page 42: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Other Web Resources

MySmokeFreeHousing.com

Lists thousands of multiunit residential buildings in Colorado with no-smoking policies for their entire building or property.

Offers a free listing to publicize your buildings.

TobaccoFreeCO.org

Provides information about the Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act.

COHealthResources.org

Provides free signage and other materials.42

Page 43: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Local and State Resources

Local or state tobacco-prevention programs may be able to assist housing providers with:

Surveys and implementation steps.

Sample policies and educational materials.

Guidance and assistance.

Smoking-cessation resources and information.

43

Page 44: The Case for Smoke-Free Housing

Statewide Contacts

44

Pete BialickGroup to Alleviate Smoking Pollution (GASP of Colorado)303-444-9799gaspforair.org

Jill Bednarek, MSWColorado Department of Public Health and Environment303-692-2475colorado.gov/cdphe/A35-tobacco