The Case for BOP as a Market

29
The Case for BOP as a The Case for BOP as a Market Market Prof. Eric A. Brewer Prof. Eric A. Brewer UC Berkeley UC Berkeley ICT for Developing Regions ICT for Developing Regions September 3, 2003 September 3, 2003

description

The Case for BOP as a Market. Prof. Eric A. Brewer UC Berkeley ICT for Developing Regions September 3, 2003. Today’s Focus. Aid is not sustainable It must be an investment (Profitable) businesses are sustainable Also stabilize a region Promote entrepreneurism and social mobility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Case for BOP as a Market

Page 1: The Case for BOP as a Market

The Case for BOP as a MarketThe Case for BOP as a Market

Prof. Eric A. BrewerProf. Eric A. BrewerUC BerkeleyUC Berkeley

ICT for Developing RegionsICT for Developing RegionsSeptember 3, 2003September 3, 2003

Page 2: The Case for BOP as a Market

Today’s FocusToday’s Focus Aid is not sustainableAid is not sustainable

It must be an investment (Profitable) businesses are sustainable(Profitable) businesses are sustainable

Also stabilize a region Promote entrepreneurism and social mobility

Prahalad:Prahalad: the poor are a viable market ICT can make a difference

Page 3: The Case for BOP as a Market

Aid is temporary…Aid is temporary…

Page 4: The Case for BOP as a Market

4 Billion PeopleEarning less than $2,000/year

< $2,000 4,000

‘‘The Bottom of the Pyramid’The Bottom of the Pyramid’

Middle Classin developing

countries

$2,000—$20,000 2,000

WealthyNations

Annual Purchasing PowerParity (PPP) in $US

> $20,000

PopulationIn Millions

100

Source: Prahalad & Hammond, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, Issue 9 (Sep. 2002), pp48-58

emerging‘mass’ markets

adjacentmarkets

We Can Build Large and SustainableWe Can Build Large and SustainableBusinesses Based on These MarketsBusinesses Based on These Markets

Page 5: The Case for BOP as a Market

The Poor as a MarketThe Poor as a Market Very high existing costsVery high existing costs Real purchasing powerReal purchasing power Already purchase “luxury” itemsAlready purchase “luxury” items Able to adapt to new technologyAble to adapt to new technology

Page 6: The Case for BOP as a Market

Being poor is expensive…Being poor is expensive… Drinking WaterDrinking Water

4-100x the cost compared to middle class Lima, Peru: 20x base cost, plus transportation

Food: 20-30% more (even in poor areas of US)Food: 20-30% more (even in poor areas of US) Credit:Credit:

10-15% interest/day is common (>1000% APR) GrameenBank is 50% APR

Cell phone:Cell phone: $1.50/minute prepaid (about 10x) in Brazil

Page 7: The Case for BOP as a Market

Suburbs of Mumbai (Bombay)Suburbs of Mumbai (Bombay)DharaviDharavi

(shantytown)(shantytown)Warden RoadWarden Road RatioRatio

Credit (APR)Credit (APR) 600-1000%600-1000% 12-18%12-18% 60-75x60-75x

Water (100 gal)Water (100 gal) $0.43$0.43 $0.011$0.011 37x37x

Phone (cents/min)Phone (cents/min) 4-54-5 2.52.5 2x2x

Diarrhea MedsDiarrhea Meds $20$20 $2$2 10x10x

Rice ($/kg)Rice ($/kg) $0.28$0.28 $0.24$0.24 1.2x1.2x

Page 8: The Case for BOP as a Market

More on DharaviMore on Dharavi Represents Represents urban poorurban poor

1300 cities with >1M people Urban ICT could reach 2B people by 2015

Dense: 44,000 people per square mileDense: 44,000 people per square mile Berkeley: 9700 Pittsburgh: 6000

6 churches, 27 temples, 11 mosques6 churches, 27 temples, 11 mosques About $450M in manufacturing revenueAbout $450M in manufacturing revenue Lots of small inefficient businesses already…Lots of small inefficient businesses already…

Page 9: The Case for BOP as a Market

Rural PoorRural Poor Rural areas generate about 60% of India’s GDPRural areas generate about 60% of India’s GDP Challenge is Challenge is physical distributionphysical distribution

Drives the move toward urbanization… ICT may be the cheapest (new) infrastructure…

ICT could help with:ICT could help with: Education Over-the-network jobs

Page 10: The Case for BOP as a Market

ICT could be adopted…ICT could be adopted… GrameenPhone: operators use GSM phones, GrameenPhone: operators use GSM phones,

memorize calling codes, etc…memorize calling codes, etc… Test use of palm pilots for bookkeepping (to Test use of palm pilots for bookkeepping (to

replace paper), worked well in Indiareplace paper), worked well in India Negotiation via internet phone in El SalvadorNegotiation via internet phone in El Salvador NairoBits (Kenya) teaches urban poor HTMLNairoBits (Kenya) teaches urban poor HTML See See Digital DividendDigital Dividend web site… web site…

Page 11: The Case for BOP as a Market

Hindustan Lever (Unilever)Hindustan Lever (Unilever) Best example of products for BoPBest example of products for BoP Candy:Candy:

Simple high-quality fruit centers (real sugar) About $0.01/serving (not sold individually!) Fastest growing product in any category Profitable in 6 months Low margin, but high ROI

Page 12: The Case for BOP as a Market

Hindustan Lever (2)Hindustan Lever (2) Ice Cream (novel technology)Ice Cream (novel technology)

About $0.04/serving Problem: no refrigeration at stores or vending

machines Solution: better packaging keeps it cold for 24 hours

Keys: mass production, supply-chain mgmt.Keys: mass production, supply-chain mgmt. Ice cream was previously a “luxury” productIce cream was previously a “luxury” product

Very high latent demand

Page 13: The Case for BOP as a Market

Hindustan Lever (3)Hindustan Lever (3) Overall: $2.6B portfolio of productsOverall: $2.6B portfolio of products

Zero working capital => high ROI New businesses judged by capital required, volume

Management training:Management training: Requires all management (including CEO) to spend

time in villages and in typical stores Should lead to better products and tactics

Page 14: The Case for BOP as a Market

Services for BoPServices for BoP Top three:Top three:

Education (20% of Digital Dividend projects) Credit (micro-loans) Wireless phones

Page 15: The Case for BOP as a Market

TARAhaat PortalTARAhaat Portal Portal for rural IndiaPortal for rural India

Franchised village Internet centers Revenue from commissions and member fees

Biggest success: for-profit educational servicesBiggest success: for-profit educational services ICT: telephone, VSAT, diesel generatorsICT: telephone, VSAT, diesel generators Local content developed by franchiseeLocal content developed by franchisee

Mostly 2 languages, moving toward 18 Social goals met, financial unclear…Social goals met, financial unclear…

Page 16: The Case for BOP as a Market

N-Logue (2)N-Logue (2) Keys: Keys:

Train LSPs, kiosk owners Deal with (severe) regulatory issues (IIT helps here) Develop local content (usually by LSP)

Challenges:Challenges: Ongoing regulatory issues Capital intensive business Technology?

Page 17: The Case for BOP as a Market

Wireless PhoneWireless Phone Direct models (one per user)Direct models (one per user)

Prepaid cellular $10-20 cards in Latin America Very profitable ($1.50/minute) Very high demand

Ericsson MiniGSM 5000 users in 35km radius Ships in single container (Relatively) easy to set up

Page 18: The Case for BOP as a Market

Shared WirelessShared Wireless Shared use is the easiest way to reduce cost…Shared use is the easiest way to reduce cost… GrameenPhoneGrameenPhone

Regular GSM phones and basestations (Nokia) Bid on and won a national GSM license Regular customers paid for early basestations

GrameenTelecomGrameenTelecom The social enterprise Works with rural franchisees (who get micro-loans) Shared use model

Page 19: The Case for BOP as a Market

GrameenPhone (2)GrameenPhone (2) Rural phones: $93 per phone per monthRural phones: $93 per phone per month

> Twice as much as urban phones (not shared) Some phones > $1000/month But only 2% of total phones (but 8% of revenue)

Monopoly phone company is a real problemMonopoly phone company is a real problem Anti-competitive, outdated laws Limiting factor for the number of villages reached

4200 out of 65,000 so far

Room for better technology (for the rural users)Room for better technology (for the rural users)

Page 20: The Case for BOP as a Market

N-Logue Rural Internet AccessN-Logue Rural Internet Access Spun out of IIT MadrasSpun out of IIT Madras Rural connectivity is very low, but demand highRural connectivity is very low, but demand high Three groups:Three groups:

“Foundation” – HW/SW partners LSPs – Local service providers (one per region)

Up to 50,000 e-mail users per LSP Kiosk owners – individual entreprenuers

Capital is about $400 per “line” Custom Technology (but obsolete!)Custom Technology (but obsolete!)

25km line-of-sight wireless to LSP Should be able to move to newer networks

Page 21: The Case for BOP as a Market

Prahalad’s SuggestionsPrahalad’s Suggestions ICT is a tool for regular businessICT is a tool for regular business

Larger reach at lower costs Lower transaction costs Better pricing, planning, supply chains…

Enlightened managementEnlightened management Focus on ROI, not margin (or product cost) Solve the whole problem (e.g. ice cream packaging) Local content, local adaptation, local training

Page 22: The Case for BOP as a Market

Prahalad Suggestions (2)Prahalad Suggestions (2) Role for R&DRole for R&D

HP Labs in India, China Hindustan Level has full-scale R&D for BoP market Challenges are different than first world

Power, cost, literacy… BoP is early (risky).. So share risksBoP is early (risky).. So share risks

NGO or government help Global Digital Opportunity Initiative (Markle & UNDP)

Consortia TARAhaat member companies share the risk

Page 23: The Case for BOP as a Market

Rough SummaryRough Summary Potential for large high-growth marketsPotential for large high-growth markets

Current systems are very inefficient Opportunities to create income/jobs as well Focus on ROI (use of capital)

There is a role for technologyThere is a role for technology Simple (like ice cream) Complex (new wireless for rural areas) Users happy to adapt (and able!)

Franchising seems to be a key to scalabilityFranchising seems to be a key to scalability

Page 24: The Case for BOP as a Market

BackupBackup

Page 25: The Case for BOP as a Market

Growth in Megacities—An Urban FutureGrowth in Megacities—An Urban Future

Concentrated Population can be Addressed More Efficiently

Page 26: The Case for BOP as a Market

Example:Example:An Emerging Market—IndiaAn Emerging Market—India

http://www.wri.org/meb/wrisummit/pdfs/hart.pdf

Traditional MNCBusiness Model

Some MNCs?

Local Firms

FutureOpportunity?

Page 27: The Case for BOP as a Market

The ‘Yes, But…’sThe ‘Yes, But…’s Corporate cost structures are a given…Corporate cost structures are a given…

“The poor cannot be our target customers because, with our current cost structures, we cannot compete in that market profitably.”

Our focus is on products, not functionality. We worry Our focus is on products, not functionality. We worry about ‘detergents’, not ‘cleanliness’about ‘detergents’, not ‘cleanliness’“The poor cannot afford, nor can they have any use for, the products and services sold in developed markets”

Our emphasis is product and process innovation, not Our emphasis is product and process innovation, not business innovationsbusiness innovations“Only the developed markets appreciate and will pay for new technology—the poor should adapt and use the last generation for themselves.”

Source: Prof C. K. Prahalad, U Mich.

Wrong!Wrong!

Wrong!Wrong!

Wrong!Wrong!

Page 28: The Case for BOP as a Market

The ‘Yes, But…’sThe ‘Yes, But…’s We do not see the Bottom of the Pyramid forcing us to We do not see the Bottom of the Pyramid forcing us to

innovate around sustainable developmentinnovate around sustainable development“The Bottom of the Pyramid is not important to the long term viability of our business. It should be served by governments and non-profits.”

Managers do not get excited about business challenges Managers do not get excited about business challenges that have a humanitarian element to themthat have a humanitarian element to them“Intellectual excitement is in the developed markets—it would be hard and expensive to recruit, train and motivate managers to tackle such a challenge.”

If this was a viable and important marketplace, If this was a viable and important marketplace, someone would have already tackled it successfullysomeone would have already tackled it successfully

Source: Prof C. K. Prahalad, U Mich.

Wrong!Wrong!

Wrong!Wrong!

Wrong!Wrong!

Page 29: The Case for BOP as a Market

““Bad Tech”: NestleBad Tech”: Nestle Starting in the 1970’s, Nestle pushed infant Starting in the 1970’s, Nestle pushed infant

formula to third-world mothers:formula to third-world mothers: Mistaken belief that it is was better (in US) Assumed sterile water and bottles!! Assumed mother would not dilute (saving money) Results 25x more likely to die of diarrhea Worse: use of formula for a while stopped lactation

(causing an addiction)