The Canadian Patriot #5

7/29/2019 The Canadian Patriot #5

1/58


2/58

2

In this issue

For more information visit:

www.committeerepubliccanada.ca

To know more about our associates in

the USA through our Political Action

Committee or Intelligence Magazine

(Executive Intelligence Review), visit:

www.larouchepac.com

www.larouchepub.com

To contact the Committee for the Re-

public of Canada, write to

[email protected] or call

(514)-461-7209

Editorial Board

Matthew Ehret-Kump

Jean-Philippe Lebleu

Staff

Avneet Thapar

Pascal Chevrier

David Gosselin

Franois Lpine

Robert Hux, Ph.D.

Ilko Dimov

Birgit Henker

Pierre Beaudry

The history of Canada is one of the most obscured and mis-understood dra-

mas in the western world. Until today, no principled investigation has un-veiled the character of the Canadian experience as located between the bi-polar tension caused by the incompatible co-existence of the American andBritish Systems of political economy. The shedding of light upon this ob-scurity is the challenge which the authors of the following report in this Ca-nadian Patriot have taken up.

Through the analysis provided by the groundbreaking studies of Americaneconomist Lyndon LaRouche on physical economy, and his proof of the anti-entropic character of human economic systems, researchers of history have

been granted a key to unlock the causal principles of historical changes.The fact is, as this issue and past reports have rigorously laid out, it is notmerely human economic systems which must submit to the principle of con-stant anti-entropy (ie: constant creative growth), but that the entire universeexhibits the same characteristic property, from abiotic, to living matter. The

perceived interests of empire which rely upon its control of fixed parametersand monetary logic, has developed a complex web of institutions enforced

by change agents over countless generations that have been driven bywhat LaRouche has called the Oligarchical Principle or the submissionto the ideology of master-slave social organization. The physical economicexpression of this principle as it is presented in the following reports strivesto destroy the potential for creative anti-entropic change exhibited by hu-manity.

This fifth issue of the Patriot begins with two reports on Daniel Johnsonsfight to break free of the fixed limits of the British Empire, taking advantageof the bold insight and vision of the great French President Charles deGaulle. We then introduce a series of studies which expose for the first timeever, the entire complex of change agents from Maurice Strong, LiberalParty controller Walter Gorden, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield and GeneralAndrew MacNaughton. These agents, often tragically believed to be great"canadian heroes" worked with full vigor to destroy the potential unleashed

by the allies of FDR, Eisenhower and JFK in Canada who, up until the early1960s were on the cusp of ushering in a new age of continental water andenergy development beginning with NAWAPA and the optimistic belief inthe unbounded potential of human progress. These British Imperial changeagents working though the World Wildlife Fund and 1001 Club have alsoinfluenced the brainwashing of the native populations of the Americas totake on identities incompatible with scientific and technological optimismwhich has served as justification for the passage of the recent genocidal bill

C-383 in Canadas House of Commons.

We urge you to read the following studies with an intention not merely toconsume history, but rather to become equipped to shape the future.


3/58

3

Contents

In this issue .................................................................................................................................2

The de Gaulle-Johnson Struggle to Save the Soul of Quebec.....4

The Fight for Continental Water Management in Quebec.14

The Origins of Maurice Strong`s Imperial Perversion of Canada..17

The 1001 Club and Maurice Strong`s Kindergarden.26

Walter Gordon`s Cultural Engineering, Global Governance and Anarchism in Canada..27

Sections of Assembly of First Nations and Idle No More being Played by Monarchy34

The British Crown is Guilty of Canadian Inuit Deportation.35

Permindex Ties revealed to JFK Murder, 1001 Club....38

The Ugly Truth About General Andrew McNaughton..45

The History of NAWAPA: Reviving the Spirit of JFK..48

The Genocidal Mind of Empire.53

The Canadian PatriotThe Canadian PatriotThe Canadian Patriot


4/58

4

(Based on original research done by Raynald Rouleau in 2002

and published inlAcropole)

Every revolutionary scientific discovery must necessar-

ily throw into question our entire system of axioms

which compose our scientific baggage. For example,

had Kepler accepted the theory that pre-supposed the

earth to be at the center of the Solar System 500 yearsago, he could never have calculated the relative dis-

tance between the planets, nor their elliptical orbits or

harmonic arrangement around the Sun. Likewise, had

Eratosthenes supposed the earth to be flat 2500 years

ago, he never could have calculated its circumference.

Similarly, in order to ensure Canadas and Quebecs

full participation in a new international Glass-Steagall

system revolution, it will be necessary to address and

challenge the axioms underlying some of our popula-

tions deeply held beliefs about national history and

culture.

Part 1

The Origins of theParti Qubcois

The founders of theParti Qubcois (PQ) never had theintention of transforming Quebec into a truly sovereigncountry: that is to say, a constitutional republic, inde-

pendent of the British Empire. A republic that would bebuilt upon the inalienable rights of citizens, as thesewere defined and later enshrined in the preamble of theUnited States Constitution by the founding fathers of the

American republic, as the right to life, liberty and thepursuit of happiness.

We are not referencing the actual leaders of the PQ, butrather those who, from the beginning, catalyzed the PQinto existence and continue, to this day, to forge and

profit from the artificial divisions that were partly suc-cessful in setting up the larger segment of the populationof Quebec, the French speakers against the English

speaking Canadians liv-ing in Quebec and therest of Canada. A per-ceived unbridgeable di-vide that was famouslycalled The Two Solitudes,in earlier times.

In fact, these catalysers ofthe separatist movementhad fought tooth and nailagainst Daniel JohnsonSr. who was among theleading nation-builders inCanadian history and onewho did have a missionto implement a constitu-tional republic for Can-ada modeled on theAmerican constitution.

The PQ was created 16 days after the tragic death ofDaniel Johnson, the then Premier of Quebec. The goalwas simple: attract all separatist-nationalist forces;whether they be left, right, communist, socialist, orcatholic. The game plan was straightforward: maintainthe separatist movement as a wedge issue, a divide andconquer British Empire tactic and prevent a Johnsonsolution that would overthrow the British strangleholdover Canada.

In 1982, the LaRouche authored Draft Proposal for aCommonwealth of Canada was also an attempt to free

all Canadians from British imperial control. Now, in2013, the required policy is called the Glass-Steagallsystem that would eliminate speculative banking andcreate a Canadian National Bank, on Hamiltons model,that would issue large amounts of productive publiccredit that would transform Canada into a fully sover-eign nation-state.

The De Gaulle-Johnson Interventionto Save the Soul of Quebec

(and the world)By a CRC Investigative Team

Quebecs republican Premier

Daniel Johnson (1915-68)

struggled to free Canada of its

British Constitution


5/58

5

The Queens Crown AgentsOne of the impediments to a sovereign Canada has

been an aspect of the Monarchys extension into itscolonies and beyond which is of exceptional impor-tance for Canadians and Quebecois to become familiarwith: Her Majestys Crown Agents.

Before Canada was ever given the legal status ofcountry, the term in usage was Dominion of Can-ada; an appendage of the British Empire within the

North American continent, administered by CrownAgents, across hundreds of institutions.

This structure still exists to this day, and in certainways, exercises an even greater influence today.Crown Agents have no formal Constitution and arenot part of the United Kingdom Civil Service or of theUnited Kingdom Government machine... Crown agentsact as businesses and financial agents for the Govern-ments of all territories for the administration of whichthe Secretary of State is ultimately responsible, includ-ing the territories under the protection of Her Majestyand the territories administered on behalf of the United

Nations(1).

Crown Agents work directly through such key organi-zations that run the upper echelons of the Civil Service,as well as the Canadian Institute for International Af-fairs. These bodies coordinate directly with the Cana-dian oligarchy and Londons Foreign Office throughthe Canadian Council of Chief Executives. It is notwithin the corporate boards of directors or even parlia-ment, but here in this hive, where the real directing

power of Canada is located.

As for the Parti Qubcois itself, it was founded byRen Lvesque. During World War II, Lvesque wasrecruited by an agent going by the name of Robb (2),who was the Montreal bureau chief of the Office ofWar Information (OWI), a nominally American intelli-gence service, but which operated under British control(3). Lvesque was sent to New York to meet Pierre

Lazareff, the editor-in-chief of the French ser-vices of the OWI (4). Hewas quickly sent to Lon-don. By the end of thewar he had attained theequivalent to the level ofcaptain: We were stillamong the best paid guys.

I had something equiva-lent to the grade of lieu-tenant. I think I ended asa captain. I wasnt a cap-

tain in charge of a unit,but something equiva-lent said Ren Lvesquein an interview years later. After this experience, hewas recruited by British intelligence as a journalistfor the Montreal office of the international radio ser-vice of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).

He was transferred to television services in the 1950sand became a celebrity for the French Canadians withhis popular political-economic news program Point de

Mire on Radio Canada.

During the 1950s and early1960s, Lvesque was a regu-lar contributor to the maga-zine Cit Libre begun by hisschool period friend, PierreElliot Trudeau. By this time,Trudeau had also been re-cruited by British Intelli-

gence after his conditioningat Harvard, and the LondonSchool of Economics. Tru-deau was tutored by mentorslike William Yandell Elliot,Joseph Schumpeter, and theleader of the British FabianSociety Harold Laski. Bothyoung men had been profiledearly on in the Jesuit-runelitist Collge Jean-de-

Brbeuf. The idea that there had been a legitimate feudbetween these two men in later years became one ofthe greatest frauds of Canadian history.

It was at this moment that Lvesque was officiallycatapulted to action in Quebec politics. The reason wasvery simple. It was vital to end, at all cost, the power ofthe Union Nationale as Daniel Johnson was in the

(1) p.1-2A Short History of Crown Agents and Their Office , by ArthurWilliam Abbott, C.M.G, C.B.E The Chiswick Press 1959. -- A.W. Abbott t Secrtaire de Crown Agents de 1954 1958.

(2) p. 45Rene Lvesque: Portrait d'un Qubcois , par Jean Provencherd. La Presse 1973

(3) In order to win the war, Roosevelt created the OWI and OSS (Officeof Strategic Services). OWI took care of the propaganda while OSS tookcare of intelligence. After the war the OSS and OWI were dismantled, asthey were not entirely under American control. The OSS became the CIAand the OWI was re-integrated into British Intelligence services.

(4) p. 71Ren Lvesque: Portrait d'un Qubcois , par Jean Provencherd. La Presse 1973

Ren Lvesque

Pierre Trudeau


6/58

6

midst of becoming its leader, after the sudden deaths ofMaurice Duplessis and Paul Sauv and the failure ofAntonio Barrette as leader of the party. With DanielJohnson as leader, the Union Nationale again won theelections of 1966. From the British point of view, thiscould absolutely not be allowed to happen. Daniel John-

son was after all, a politician of Irish descent, who un-derstood history, and most importantly understood the

psychology of the British Empire, especially how theEmpire had caused the Irish to suffer famine over gen-erations as a matter of policy. Johnson was part of asmall but influential group working within the CatholicChurch, who opposed the massive introduction of Mal-thusian values into society via the Organization of Eco-nomic Cooperation and Development (OECD) whichhad forced school reforms leading to the brainwashingof youth in all industrialized countries (5). This was the

beginning of what was later called the counter culturerevolution of sex, drugs and Rock & Roll. After theLiberal victory in Quebecs 1960 elections, RenLvesque, and anotherBrbeuf classmate Paul Grin-Lajoie were among the new `reformers` assigned tocarry out the overhaul of the Quebec political and edu-cational structure. Oxford Rhodes Scholar Paul Grin-Lajoie, the first Minister of Education, led the radicalreforms of the Quebec educational system that broughtin those OECD reforms by 1965.

Within this small but influential group working withinthe Catholic Church, this alliance for progress and de-velopment were to be found men representing severalnations, from diverse regions of the world, such as AldoMoro of Italy, Ben Barka of Morocco, John F. Kennedyand his brother Robert, General de Gaulle of France,Cardinal Montini (later to become Pope Paul VI), andMartin Luther King, to name but a few. All promotedhuman progress. For these people, every human wascreated in the image of God, regardless of colour andevery man, woman and child had the fundamental right

to development and enjoy the full fruits of scientific andtechnological progress. This concept is extremely dan-gerous for an empire which can only maintain its he-gemony through the exploitation of resources, and a

physical-intellectual impoverishment of its subjects.

It is within this context that Ren Lvesque played hisassigned role, directly against the networks of DanielJohnson. The only positive steps taken by the LiberalParty in Quebec during their period in government(1960-1966), were made via the efforts of Charles deGaulle, his ministers, and the leader of OppositionDaniel Johnson who had many like minded thinkerswithin the Liberal Party. The intensity of their organiz-ing even influenced at times the paradoxical and con-fused Premier Jean Lesage who tended to see himself asa C.D. Howe nation-builder, yet was often controlled

by forces that he never under-stood. Little beknownst toLesage, these forces ironicallyhated both progress and espe-cially C.D. Howe, the ministerof everything of the federalLiberal Party of 1938-1957.Lesage had the wits about himto first open up Maisons duQubec in Paris with the help

of Charles de Gaulle, but notnearly enough to recognize inwhat way he was being used toundermine both Quebec andCanada as a whole.

(5) At the end of the 1950s, 60% of Qubecs students were studying in

science programs, and 50% of Canadas hydroelectric power was gener-

ated in Qubec. By the beginning of the 1960s, Hydro Qubec forecasted

that 50% of its energy would come from nuclear power by 1985. In 1963,

under the direction of Alexander King (later to go on to co found the Clubof Rome) the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development

(OECD) had produced a report which served as a model for an

educational reform within all industrialized countries. Some of these

reforms involved replacing constructive geometry for new math, and

replacing the study of Greek and Latin with French existentialism. In

Quebec, this reform coincided with the creation of the Ministry of Educa-

tion (which involved a battle between the Catholic church and Freema-

sonry). See La Prsse of November 11, 1963- A five part series defending

the Grand Lodge of Quebec.

An unfortunate Jean Lesage (center) celebrates his victory in1960 with two architects of The Quiet Revolution Ren

Lvesque (left) and Paul Grin-Lajoie (right).

C.D. Howe represented

one of the last pro-

development leaders in

Canadian federal politics


7/58

7

The majority of the financing of the Liberal Party at that

time, was coming from the networks run by MauriceStrong, an enemy of Charles de Gaulle, who himself wasan active agent working for the networks of PrincePhilip and Prince Bernhard. Liberal Party funds werechannelled through subsidiary entities controlled byPower Corporation, of which Maurice Strong was aleading director. Strong became Vice President of PowerCorporation in 1963, after having made a fortune duringthe nationalization of electricity in Quebec. Power Cor-

poration soon got out of the business of energy andquickly became a giant consortium specializing in finan-cial services whose reins were given to a young PaulDesmarais to run as an integral component to the newly

re-organized Canadian oligarchy in 1968.

To get a simple idea of the relationship between RenLvesque and Daniel Johnson: One day, during a sessionof the National Assembly, Levesque told Johnson voustes le personnage le plus vomissant que je con-naisse (you are the most disgusting person that I

know). (6)

Nevertheless, after Louis Joseph Papineau, Daniel John-son is the political figure who did the most to advancethe development of Quebec and its citizens. Johnsonunderstood that in order for the idea of a new constitu-

tion to be accepted in Canada, it needed the approval ofthe other provinces, though not necessarily Ottawa. Ineffect, due to a fallacy imbedded in the British NorthAmerica Act of 1867, the progress of Canada has oftentended to be catalyzed by the provinces rather than thefederal government.

From a legal standpoint, Ottawa was rarely much more

than the buffer between the British Empire and the

Canadians. When Ottawa had been able to direct truedevelopment as was seen clearly during the 1937-1957Liberal Party leadership, it was due to a mix of Ameri-can private and public initiative, and the vast war powersused by the likes of C.D. Howe which permitted him to

bypass both the parliamentary red tape and the civil ser-vice bureaucracy long after World War II had come toan end. Daniel Johnson knew that if he could gain thesupport of the provinces, then Ottawa would have noother choice but to accept the will of the people.

An informal conference comprising the ten provinceshad occurred by the end of 1967, in order to put in place

a strategy which went on to become the first officialConstitutional conference in February 1968, whichstrove to adopt a Canadian Constitution, written by andfor Canadians. A constitutional committee made up of

provincial representatives was established in the courseof that month. This committees mandate involvedstudying all of the propositions made by the provinces.Sadly, on June 5, 1968, Johnson suffered a severe heartattack, forcing him to pull out of politics for 10 weeks,returning triumphantly in September. He gave a pressconference on September 25 in Quebec, just before leav-ing for the inauguration of the Manicouagan 5 dam,where he was planning to unveil his full nation-building

vision. He was planning to meet de Gaulle ten days later,and was intending to invite him to return to Quebec in1969. However, the next morning he was found dead inhis bed at the foot of the great hydro project that he hadset into motion ten years earlier.

To add insult to injury, Charles de Gaulle was denied aninvitation to attend the funeral of mon ami Johnson.This marked the end of Johnsons Constitutional project.

While many people only recognize the lower level oligarchy expressed by such cardboard cutouts as Paul Desmarais and Maurice Strong (on right), the

true locus of power is to be found another degree above this in form of the royals . Co-founders of the World Wildlife Foundation, and 1001 Club

Prince Phillip Mountbatten and the late Prince Bernhard (on left) represent the pure evil demanding world government and depo pulation today.

(6) Jean Provencher, Ren Lvesque: Portrait dun qubecois, 1973, p.166


8/58

8

Part 2The de Gaulle-Johnson Project

During the summer of 1967, Canada was celebrating itscentennial with the 100th anniversary of the BritishNorth America Act. It must be noted that the CanadianConfederation of 1867 was formed for no other reason

but the protection of the empire against the republicanforces of Abraham Lincoln in the United States andtheir allies in Canada. That same year, the president ofFrance took the hand extended to him by Daniel John-son, which sent a shockwave throughout the entire

North American continent. De Gaulle received an offi-cial invitation from the Premier of Quebec in May1967, after Mr. Johnson himself was the Generals

guest of honour in Paris.

During this historic meeting, France and Quebec hadput an emphasis upon nine principled points of coop-eration for the development of culture, technology, andindustry. One of these points involved Quebecs entryinto the Franco-German space program Symphony,for the development of communications satellites (7).We must remember that thanks to de Gaulle, Francehad become a world power centering on the pillars ofProgress, Independence and Peace. De Gaulle toldthe people of Quebec: Your history is our history. Inreality this is the history of France, he added thatwithin the circumstances it is now up to you to play

the role which was written for you, a French role.This did not mean that those who spoke English orwere foreign to France couldnt play a French role.Are you inspired by the idea of Progress, Independ-ence and Peace? If so, then in the mind of de Gaulle,

you are French!

Continuing his voyage in Canada, de Gaulle spoke inthe Town of Berthier on July 24 1967: France for her

part, after great obstacles and tests, is in the midst of abooming renewal and, you can see and feel it. It is an

example both of pro-gress for the world,but also an exampleof the service of men,wherever or whom-ever they are!

Midway betweenQubec and Mont-real, at the industrialcity of Trois-Rivires, the Generalhad launched a bril-liant attack againstthe British Empire:When a nation is

born, we cannot jus-tify her existence andher rights, as you sung Oh Canada earlier, we can-

not justify her existence and her rights unless we aremoving towards progress. This is who you are, and Ican see it from one end of Quebec to the other. You arein the midst of accomplishing magnificent economicand technological developments!

If we look at the world today, those countries most un-der-developed are those territories which are under theinfluence of the British Empire. The love of pro-gress, as de Gaulle describes it, is non existent withinthe British Empire. Enslavement and the pillaging ofresources are the only conditions within which the can-cerous Empire can survive. But as Johnson and de

Gaulle understood the problem clearly, cancerous cellshave no lasting future. They die with the host whichthey had just killed. The greater their power, the hardertheir fall. A country cannot survive for long unless it is

perpetually creating true wealth, unless it is progress-ing.

De Gaulle saw his intervention in Canada from 1960 to1969 as not only an intervention into international geo-

politics, but of primary importance for all humankind.Continuing his voyage along the shores of the St Law-rence River, he declared during a stop in Louiseville:this effort (the cooperation between France and New

France for progress, independence and peace), thiseffort is something which France wishes to develop and

you can count on her, since that which we do together,we French from one side of the Atlantic to the other, iswhat we can do to improve humanity as a whole.

(7) The Symphony Program was a Franco-German project consisting of

two communications satellites which would have the effect of connectingQuebec with the rest of the French speaking world. De Gaulle invited

Quebec to participate with Johnson replying the cosmos will speak

French. The project wouldnt be ready until the beginning of the 1970s.

Sadly, the Ariane rockets had exploded on lift off twice and were finally

sent in space by the American Delta rocket in 1974 and 1975. However

the Americans only cooperated on the condition that there would be no

intercontinental link, thus immediately excluding Quebec from the pro-

ject.

President Charles de Gaulle


9/58

9

Vive le Qubec Libre!On July 24, de Gaulles open top presidential motorcademade several stops in small towns and villages on his

journey between Quebec and Montreal on what isknown as the former Chemin du Roy (the Kings Path)along the northern shore of the St. Lawrence. Through-

out the day, he gave several short speeches, in differenttowns and villages, to cheering crowds. Before hereached Montreal in the early evening, he already had

been enthusiastically greeted by nearly half a millionpeople. In the evening, he delivered his famous speechfrom the balcony of Montreal City Hall, in front of alarge crowd assembled at Place Jacques Cartier.

... I will confide in you a secret you should not repeat.

Both this evening, and all along my journey, I havefound myself in the same sort of atmosphere as I experi-enced during the Liberation. On top of this, I have seenwhat efforts have been achieved towards progress, de-

velopment and consequently freedom that you have ac-complished here... This is why she (France) has, along-side the government of Quebec, and alongside my friendJohnson, signed treaties to unite the French from bothsides of the Atlantic... You are in the midst of becomingelites, you are creating factories, enterprises, laborato-ries which will surprise everyone... Long live Montreal!

Long live Quebec! Long live a free Quebec! Long live aFrench Canada and long live France !

The British monarchy was frightened by the visit of deGaulle. The awakening of the little people, the awak-ening of a country, of a republic, the idea of freedom,

and the integration of that spark of France, which isdiametrically opposed to the Empire, represented a mor-tal threat to its existence. This is why a propaganda cam-

paign was unleashed exclaiming: de Gaulle is playingthe game of a small minority of extremists who want the

separation of Quebec. (72% of French Canadians werefavourable to the policies of de Gaulle: Four million...that makes a nice small minority of extremists.)

It is quite interesting to note that Ren Lvesque, theParti Qubcoiss future leader, one of the leaders of thereal minority of separatists, was not at all happy with deGaulles move:

We tried, until the last moment, to convince Aquin [one

of Lvesques colleague] not to go ahead with his state-

ment [in favour of de Gaulle]. () It didnt take longbefore he was dubbed a Gaullist MNA. Thats exactly

what we wanted to avoid when forming the movement.() You will find it was one of the major reasons wedelayed the creation of the movement.

Lvesque would angrily say:we dont need the Frenchto tell us what to do. We will not become the lowly imita-tors of the general, thank you (9)

Showing a total lack of understanding towards deGaulles design, Lvesque continues: We maintain anenormous gratitude to de Gaulle, for having, by thishappy mistake, made us known to the world. Lvesquesays mistake, what a lack of insight! As if the BritishEmpires attack on de Gaulle was based on the Vive leQubec Libre De Gaulle had put sticks in the Em-

pires gears the whole time he was President of theFrench Republic. That is why they hated him so much,not for few words said on the balcony of Montreals City

Hall.

(8) p. 249 Daniel Johnson: 1964-1968 la difficile recherche de l'galit.Pierre Godin, Edition de l'homme,1980.

De Gaulle stands on the balcony of City Hall in Montreal, Quebechaving just challenged thousands of Quebecois to break with the

British Empire.

Daniel Johnson and Charles de Gaulle in Quebec

(9) Claude Fournier, Ren Lvesque: Portrait dun homme seul, 1993,

p.83-84


10/58

10

Part 3

Freedom for the Whole of CanadaDe Gaulle was never a separatist. On the contrary, it

could be said that he was more favourable to a Cana-dian marriage than a Quebec-British relationship. Theofficial declaration of the French Ministers Council ofJuly 31 1967 was clear: He (de Gaulle) was broughtto measure their will (of the French Canadians) to at-tain the evolution that would need to be accomplishedby Canada as a whole to control their own affairs andbecome masters of their own progress.

Contrary to popular opinion, de Gaulles intentionswere never to destroy Canada, but rather to liberate itfrom the British octopus, so that all of Canada couldenjoy the liberty that would be the effect of Frances

policy of Progress, Independence and Peace. While deGaulle and Johnson clearly wanted to liberate Quebec,they knew that it wouldnt be possible as long as Can-ada were an appendage of the Crown During his

press conference of November 27, 1967 at the Palaisde lElyse, de Gaulle explained what twopreconditions were absolutely necessary for a free

Quebec to come into being.

The first would be a complete change of the Canadianpolitical structure that had been established a centuryearlier by the British Monarchy. The second conditionwould necessitate the re-uniting of lost bonds betweenthe French cultures on both sides of the Atlantic in soli-darity. Alas, today we know that a series of (well syn-chronized) heart attacks insured that the historic reun-ion that de Gaulle dreamed of would not occur. Thisfailure contributed directly to the formation of the terri-

ble Anglo-American geopolitical system that we knowtoday.

Diefenbaker, de Gaulle and Johnson

Throughout the 1960s, Daniel Johnson fought to ensurethat not only Quebec, but Canada as a whole wouldeventually become sovereign and adopt a republicanconstitution. He understood, as General de Gaulle didalso, that the proper development of a French societywithin Canada could only occur if Canada itself be-came a sovereign nation based upon a principle of pro-gress. This is the only way to comprehend Johnson`s

battle cry:independenceif necessary, but not nec-essarily independence.

This understanding wasevidenced in Johnsons

energetic support to en-sure the sweeping vic-tory of John Diefenbakeras Prime Minister in1957 and 1958 winningthe full support of theU n i o n N a t i o n a l e .Diefenbaker is distin-guished as the only Ca-nadian Prime Minister tocampaign vigorously fora full Canadian develop-ment plan and devotion

to scientific and techno-logical progress, going so far as to fight for the estab-lishment of a Canadian Credit System for the first (andonly) time in history (10). To the astonishment of all,Diefenbakers Conservatives swept the elections takingeven the majority of the vote in Quebec, a provincewhich had never broken with its support of the federalLiberal Party since the days of Wilfrid Laurier. Sincetheir original meeting in a Commonwealth Conferenceof Parliamentarians in 1950, Diefenbaker and Johnsonwould be allies with Johnson even being consideredthe right arm of Diefenbaker in Quebec (11).

Diefenbaker was also known to be allied closely withGeneral de Gaulle during this period. This friendshipquickly formed after their first 1958 meeting in Paris.Years later, Diefenbaker wrote of his friendship withde Gaulle in the following terms: I was very muchimpressed with de Gaulles wisdom and with the full-

ness of his dedication to the service of France. In truth,he was the soul of France Of all the official visits

that I made during my period of office, none exceededin splendour General de Gaulles reception in honour

of Canada. (12)

The admiration both leaders shared for one anotherestablished a foundation of cooperation based upon acommon recognition that the sovereignty of nationsrested upon their commitment to constant rejuvenation.Were the policies of Diefenbaker and his NorthernVision to succeed, a systemic overhaul of the Cana-

dian federal political structure must necessarily have

(10) Matthew Ehret-Kump, Diefenbaker and the Sabotage of the NorthernVision, The Canadian Patriot, CRC, January 2013, p. 28(11) Albert Gervais, Daniel Johnson: A Short Biography, pg. 18

(12) John Diefenbaker, Memoirs vol. 2, Macmillan of Canada, Toronto,

p.94

De Gaulle and Johnson ally

John Diefenbaker


11/58

11

occurred. A universal cultural heritage ofprogress would have established a principleupon which a multi-linguistic unified coun-try of various ethnicities could organically

be nourished and grow. Without this orien-tation and a unified sense of national mis-sion living in the hearts of a people, anynation were doomed to division, and multi-cultural stagnation under the Social Darwin-ist laws of each against all. Both deGaulle and Johnson were undoubtedly sen-sitive to this fact, although Diefenbaker theunrepentant monarchist was somewhatmore nave regarding the obstacles thatwould be set in his path and eventuallysabotage much of his attempted revolutionin physical economics and statecraft.

During his Ottawa message of April 18,1960, Charles de Gaulle expressed his feel-ing of a Canada pregnant with the potentialfor progressive change, in the followingterms:

How delighted and honoured I am to find

myself on Canadian soil. Many are the reasons forthis: first of all, our deeply rooted past- numerous in-deed are the links which bound us, and which, indeed,

still bind us- and then there is the more recent past. Irecall the two World Wars in which your country andmine joined forces in the battle for freedom of theworld I am therefore pleased to be back on your soil,

and to renew my many friendships, and to greet you inthe name of France. Long live Canada, Long liveFrance, and Long live the free peoples!

From a British to an American

ConstitutionWhile often critical of the direction America had cho-sen to pursue in the post-Kennedy era, de Gaulle andJohnson were not at all opposed to the United States asa country; that is to say, the essence and soul of theUnited States expressed in its constitution. This fact isevidenced by Daniel Johnsons constitution projectwhere on page 19 of his galit ou Indpendance, wecan read: It were wise to examine what opportunitiesexist to replace the British based parliamentary systemwith a congressional system based upon the Americanmodel.

The problem is clear. The origin of those terrible thingswhich we here in Canada have often attributed to theAmerican Empire can usually be traced back to anoligarchy in the City of London, moving quietly

through networks in the Canadian Establishment. DeGaulle, who had access to the most efficient intelli-gence services of the day, would certainly not ignorethe evil role played by the secret societies and eliteclubs loyal to the Empire. Those networks, which hadcome to determine in large part United States foreign

policy, have had the tendency to induce the USA tobehave very much contrary to its historical nature. Ontop of that, these networks are highly ingrained and

protected throughout Canada.

By the beginning of the 1960s, the world was enteringa very unstable period. The fruits of those great works

planted by de Gaulle over the years following WW II,revealed a new dimension to the French identity cen-tered on progress, independence and peace, andcome to play a crucial role in history. Under deGaulle`s leadership, a new era was taking form: Heremoved all French forces from NATO, he refusedEnglands desired entry into the Common Market sincehe knew that if they would be permitted entrance, thenhis Grand Design of a Europe as agreed upon by him-

self and Germanys Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, fromthe Atlantic to the Urals could never come into exis-tence. De Gaulle wanted a dtente, and that wouldinvolve ending the cold war, and advancing policies ofeconomic cooperation between the East and West. This

period therefore elicited great hope among republicanforces.

General de Gaulle and Chancellor Konrad Adenauer threw a large monkeywrench into the gears of the British Empire with de Gaulles Grand Design

for a Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals


12/58

12

Part 4

Daniel Johnsons Courage

At the official dinner honouring General de Gaulle onthe evening of his arrival in Qubec, Daniel Johnsonwas full of hope and outlined his acceptance of theGenerals challenge to join in his Great Design.

Under your leadership, France has recovered a sta-

bility that merits our admiration. She has vigorouslypursued a vast program of national planning which, intwo decades, has justified your unshakable faith inwhat you yourself have called the genius of rebirth.

[] but your light shines beyond the frontiers of old

Europe as witnessed by the eloquent receptions ofwhich you were the object in Asia and in the Americasduring recent years. Your understanding of world

problems, your decisiveness and your tenacity execut-ing your ideas polarises the hopes of numerous coun-tries. Your diplomatic actions have proven in manyways to be one of the most powerful factors of interna-tional equilibrium.

Two days later, just before de Gaulles departure, John-son added that he believed a new era was opening upfor Quebec on the world stage, and that Quebec would

be able to play a role of partner and unifying force toachieve universal good will. In the mind of the Pre-mier, the French nation in America would enter worldhistory and realize her international role.

Upon returning to Paris, de Gaulle explained his politi-cal vision to the French people, a vision which AngloAmerican political forces acting through the French

press and political channels rabidly attacked. In histelevised address of August 10, 1967, the General dem-onstrated that the liberation of New France was a

necessary aspect of French foreign policy.

Ordinarily, each of us- and this is very normal- isabsorbed by the circumstances and demands of dailylife and thus takes very little time to look at the wholeof which they are a part, or what could become of ourcountry. And yet, everything depends upon it []. As

in the tense situation in which the world finds itself,our peoples actions weigh heavily on her destiny. We

have the opportunity today to ask what goals are nec-essary for the direction of the country and which pathwill best achieve them?

[] Progress, independence and peace, are those

goals which our political decisions must follow [] In

this way, all that is realized in the development of thecountry, in whatever domain, at whatever moment, inany way, is fought in principle and without exception,all of the time, by those humble followers of its truth.

The fact that France, without denying any friendship toAnglo American nations, but breaking with absurdconformity and outdated habits, takes a proper French

position on the subject of the war in Viet Nam and theconflict in the Middle East, or- no later than yesterday-of the unanimous and powerful will to franchise that

French Canadians manifested around the President ofthe French Republic, stupefied and indignant as theywere to the apostles of decline.

ConclusionFor over four decades, a blinding darkness has spreadacross the Quebec political scene. After the death ofDaniel Johnson, the nightmarish vision of thoseapostles of decline began to be felt across all of Can-ada. Over the recent decades, no one has yet risen toshine light on the road to progress, as the light of John-sons spirit was no longer directly visible. The Englishand French populations of Canada had fallen as mothsat night, upon the blinding flame of the Empire, withCanadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau on oneside, and his counterweight, Ren Lvesque on theother. Canadians thought they had to pick either one ofthe two, without ever considering for one instant that

either choice would have them fall under a single trap.

The post 68 era of Canadian history was be shaped by counter-

culture irrationalism and the artificial conflict between PierreTrudeau and Rene Levesque


13/58

13

Would it not have been better to return to a saner pe-riod of our history and to follow the example of thoseindividuals who understood those goals of Progress,Development, Cooperation and Peace? Why must wecontinue to admire those who, consciously or not,

brought the vision of de Gaulle and Johnson to ruin?Why must we continuously give our admiration tothose who resisted joining their efforts when the timewas ripe? Whether you were for or against RenLvesque is not important, but the great error of thoseliving at that time, was their belief that Ren Lvesquetruly desired independence and sovereignty, or eventhat Lvesque represented, under one form or another,the continuity of the de Gaulle-Johnson tradition.

Johnsons presentation of his project for a constitu-tional republic to liberate all of Canada, and as deGaulle hoped, transform the soul of the United States atthe same time, was one of the most dangerous mo-ments in the Empires recent history.

By the end of the 1960s, the choking of the Frencheffort had become a terrible success, culminating withthe death of Johnson, the fall of de Gaulle in France thefollowing year, and the October crisis of 1970. The

later October Crisis was an operation directed by theSpecial services of Anglo American interests, whichterrorised hundreds of thousands of Quebecois underthe dynamic of terrorism, cultural irrationalism andmartial law, to the point that the traumatized populationforgot what exactly de Gaulle and Johnson were tryingto do for them. Little by little, the consolidation of per-fidious independence movements, of which RenLvesque was a key figurehead, became hegemonicand a trap for those in whose hearts a flame of libertyhad not yet been extinguished.

It is never easy to admit to have been scammed, espe-cially when that scam, under various guises, spanned a

period of over four decades. The majority of thosemembers of theParti Qubcois orBloc Qubcois arenot necessarily bad people, if perhaps a little nave. Ingeneral most people who want sovereign change have a

positive inclination and disgust for the effects of impe-rialism, but the fact of being emotionally attached tofalse institutions and false axioms that have led directlyto civilizations enslavement and downfall, will foreverkeep them from representing the true interests of our

people.

For vital background on the hidden

history of Canadas struggle for pro-

gress and an introduction to the true

nation builders you don`t learn about

in school, read the last issues of theCanadian Patriot. The true stories of

C.D. Howe, John Diefenbaker,

W.A.C. Bennett and the imperial

agents working through the Rhodes

Trust network that has struggled to

destroy their legacy from past and fu-

ture generations is uniquely unveiled

for the first time in these pages.

To order past copies, call or write to

the offices of the Canadian Patriot at

[email protected]

514-461-7209


14/58

14

While minister of Hydraulic Resources under the leader-

ship of lUnion Nationale Premier Maurice Duplessis(1945-1959), Daniel Johnson championed large scale wa-

ter and hydroelectric projects, making Quebec into the

premier pioneer of hydroelectric engineering in the world.Prior to Maurice Duplessis, Qubecs break with cultural

backwardness that had plagued its population for so long,had been initiated most boldly with Premier Adlard God-

bout (1939-1944) and his creation of Hydro Quebec via

the nationalization ofMontreal Light, Heat and PowerCompany. Godbouts collaborator Louis Philippe Pigeon

was inspired by Roosevelts Tennessee Valley Authority,

and began bold programs that

unleashed cheap electricity,

advanced agricultural technolo-gies and rural electrification,

breaking the usurious private

stranglehold ofMontreal Light,

Heat and Power which had

been prohibiting developmentand squeezing the population

dry with expensive and unreli-

able electricity for decades.

By 1959, approximately half ofCanada`s hydroelectric power

was coming from Quebec, and

a culture of progress was finally beginning to blossomthrough the aid of the unique `Classical education` system

whose design was to create morally developed citizensfluent in classical literature, as well as Greek and Latin.

After Duplessis` untimely death in 1959, the next wave ofcleansing of radically regressive elements inside of the

Quebec establishment occurred during the ``100 day revo-lution`` of Paul Sauv, Duplessis successor. Under Pre-

mier Sauv and Johnson, the trans-Canada highway wasconstructed through Quebec, and an array of social re-

forms were implemented leading to increased funding to

classical colleges and increased minimum wages. Johnson

was also given carte blanche to

use Quebec-based engineersinstead of Duplessis intention

to use only American firms toconstruct Quebecs energy and

water development projects.

Daniel Johnson would lead inthe initiation of several ambi-tious hydroelectric programs

during the last years of the1950s which would include theManicouagan 1, 2, 3 and 5 aswell as three sites at the Ou-tardes River with the 2600Megawatt (MW) Manicouagan 5, or Manic 5 dam as

the largest of the set. The Dams would impound theworlds fifth largest asteroid impact crater creating the

fifth largest reservoir in the world. The total electricitydevelopment of these projects would be over 7500MW!The real wealth however, would be located not in the in-creased electricity, monetary profits or even productivityof the society, but rather in the intellectual and culturalrevolution that would transform a submissive society into

proud citizens due to their increased mastery of nature.The former boundary conditions that had held Quebec

back in a closed system and a logic of scarcity, were be-ing quickly eliminated to the horror of the British Empire.

The Fight for Continental Water

Management in Quebec

By Matthew Ehret-Kump

Adlard Godbout, Photo:Commission de la capi-

tale nationale

Paul Sauv

The Manicouagan-5 Dam (later re-named the Daniel Johnson Dam)


15/58

15

The Quiet Counter-Revolution

After untimely heart attacks killed both Maurice Duplessisin 1959 and his successor Paul Sauv four months later, the

Union Nationale fizzled out and was replaced by the new

reformers of the Liberal Party of Jean Lesage and a clique

of authors of a program later called The Quiet Revolu-

tion. This program was led by Ren Lvesque who be-

came Minister of Natural Resources, his deputy MauriceLamontagne, and a young Rhodes Scholar named Paul

Grin-Lajoie. These characters had spearheaded the estab-

lishment of the first Ministry of Education, cleansing theeducational system of all traces of classical-humanism.

While Lvesque went on to form theParti Qubcois (PQ)16 days after Johnsons death, Maurice Lamontagne be-

came an influential Senator and Chair of the Commission

which purged Canadian science policy in 1970 bringing inthe Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develop-

ments (OECDs) Systems Analysis. This strategy was

being led at the time by Alexander King, then science di-rector of the OECD, and later co-founder of the Malthusian

Club of Rome, whose Canadian branch included MauriceLamontagne as a founding member. In 1970, Grin-Lajoie

would head up the Canadian International Development

Agency (CIDA) created by Maurice Strong two years ear-lier.

Grin-Lajoie employed his fellow Rhodes Scholar JeanBeetz to direct the Institute for Research into Public Law

(IRPL) at the Universit Laval in 1961, providing PierreTrudeau with his first teaching

position after having beenblacklisted by Duplessis foryears. This institute also

brought Trudeaus inner circle

collaborators Marc Lalonde andMichael Pitfield in on the Boardof Directors. All of these new

reformers were united in hav-

ing come to prominence writingfor the influential anti-Duplessismagazine Cit Libre, begun byTrudeau in 1950. At this timePitfield and Lalonde were busilyworking as assistants to Federal

Minister of Justice Davie Fulton whose assignment was to

sabotage the design of W.A.C. Bennetts Two Rivers

development policy in British Columbia (1). Fulton was alsoa Rhodes Scholar and was allied with another new nation-

alist named General Andrew McNaughton, then Canadian

head of the International Joint Commission charged withoverseeing transboundary water issues with the United

States. Their chosen method of proposing water projects onthe West Coast that would cut offthe Americans and direct water toCanadians only, would be at-tempted in the East Coast as wellas we shall soon see. The fear ofcontinentalism driven by techno-

logical progress and joint develop-ment of resources amongst Canadaand the USA was the greatest mo-tivator of the British Empire at this

time.

While many elements intent onbringing in scientific (aka: systems analysis) methods of

management in political and educational planning wereintroduced with these Liberals, positive elements such asAdlard Godbouts old ally Louis-Philippe Pigeon was

brought in to help plan for Quebecs development as well.

Daniel Johnsons friend Pierre Laporte also became a

leader within the new reformers and went on to be assas-

sinated by the RCMP controlledFLQ terrorist cells in October 1970.

Some of these elements, includingJean Lesage himself, would becameinfluenced by the aggressive diplo-macy of Charles de Gaulle who in-tended for Quebec to take on a keyrole in his international Grand De-

sign.(1) Premier Bennett fought for almost 7 years to ensure that his plans to

develop the Peace River in northern BC would not be sabotaged by either

Mcnaughton or Fulton who tried various schemes to ensure that Canada

was not brought into closer proximity with America to the north or the

south. For more, see `W.A.C Bennett: Canada`s Spritual Father to

NAWAPA`, by this author in The Canadian Patriot #4, Jan 2013

The founding members of the IRPL in 1961, most notably Marc Lalonde

(upper left), Jean Beetz (bottom left) and Pierre Trudeau (upper right)

Gen. Andrew McNaughton

Jean Lesage

Louis-Philippe Pigeon


16/58

16

Johnsons plans for the Manicoua-

gan and Outardes dams were al-

most thwarted early on due to the

intervention by Lord Edmund Leo-pold de Rothschild who commis-

sioned a study to exploit the 5428

MW hydro potential of LabradorsChurchill Falls as an alternative to

moving ahead with the Johnsondesign. General McNaughton be-

came an avid champion of the

Rothschild project and had it gone through then no cultureof Quebec engineering or development would have oc-

curred as it did, and a greater degree of separation of Can-ada from the USA would have been effected.

Through the influence of Johnsons allies in the Liberal

Party, as well as Charles de Gaulles advice, Lesage was

swayed to break with the Rothschild policy and movedahead with the Johnson plan employing Quebec engineers.

By 1965 Lesage became even more uncooperative with theBritish-run `New Reformers` when he rejected his former

adherence to the `Fulton-Favreau` formula for constitu-

tional reform then being pushed by Grin-Lajoie and theIRPL. A $100 million loan provided by B.C.s Premier

W.A.C. Bennett who was busyfighting a similar battle on the

West Coast was also used to help

Jean Lesage access highly neededcapital to begin construction of

the Manicouagan and Outardes

dams.

The intention to keep societystuck within frameworks of fixed

parameters, both materially andintellectually, has been the driverof this past cycle of history that

began with the deaths of PaulSauv, and John F. Kennedy. The

fact that mankind`s relationshipwith the biosphere is not fixed,but rather dynamic has been atroublesome reality which thoseself-proclaimed `gods` and theirlackeys would try desperately toconceal.

The sole metric of value worth

anything must befounded on the fact

that the biosphere`s

evolution is the ef-fect of an anti en-

tropic directionality

underlying the fabricof the universe, and

when humanityabides by its own

anti-entropic potential by making ever more advanced

discoveries into the universe, those parameters defining hislimits melt away and ever greater states of freedom are

opened to his potential sphere of activity. By disregardingthis fact, the British Empire, and all empires necessarily

force themselves into the conclusion, as Aeschylus`s Zeus

had done, that depopulation and the management of dimin-

ishing resources is the unfortunate basis upon which itscontinued existence must be maintained.

Let us learn from the lesson of Charles de Gaulle, PaulSauv and Daniel Johnson by throwing off the shackles ofZeus and return to a spirit of progress before the path to-wards a new dark age becomes one from which we can nolonger return.

Lord Edmund Rothschild

Johnson greets workers at the unveiling of

the Manicouagan 5 Dam

The full layout of hydroelectric power in Quebec now accounts for 40 GW of energy. The northern most

system of James Bay Project dams were constructed under Liberal PremierRobert Bourassa, and contin-

ued by Ren Lvesques, but also served to derail the Hydro Quebec policy of going nuclear following the

example of Ontario Hydro..


17/58

17

The Origins of Maurice StrongsImperial Perversion of Canada

By Matthew Ehret-Kump

Prologue

In view of the growing importance ofthe role of Canada in world policy, bothas a potential linchpin around a Eurasian- USA collaboration, but also as a tool ofBritish geopolitics in sabotaging interna-tional development, it is the purpose ofthis report to showcase one of the mostactive agents of the British Empire of

this century. Maurice Strong is a Cana-dian who has played many roles duringhis life, from Rockefeller sponsored oilexecutive, to Liberal Party sponsor,Conservation guru, to international po-litical advisor, but the invariant through-out it all has been his adherence to theFabian Societys logic of World Govern-

ance, and population reduction.

Strongs influence in shaping nationalpolicy for almost five decades for his masters in the City ofLondon cannot be overstated especially as he now oper-

ates as a key agent of influence in China playing a poten-tially devastating role in undermining the Four Powers Al-liance (Russia, China, India, and USA) promoted byAmerican economist Lyndon LaRouche.

We now present on a brief biographical profile of MauriceStrong from his unlikely beginnings in Saskatchewan to

becoming the powerful front man for the new British Em-pire.

What is Maurice Strong?

After leaving his Manitoba home at the age of 14 in 1943,the young Maurice Strong found his first job working as a

fur trader for the Hudson Bay Company in northern Can-ada. All of Strongs biographers present a series of strangegaps at this point, as he makes the unlikely shift from furtrader, to the United Nations and into leading corporate

positions of oil companies all before the age of 30. A nec-essary key to explain this early rise to prominence can befound in the fact that a sponsor of the young Strong was a

powerful member of the American branch of his family,

Anna Louise Strong, a high level memberof the Trust [See Box].

Historian Scott Thompson wrote in a1999 study of Strongs early career:Strong did not stay long with this Crown-chartered firm [Hudsons Bay], butquickly teamed up with an American ad-venturer named "Wild Bill" Richardson,who, after serving in the Royal Canadian

Air Force, had begun prospecting in theNorth. Through his wife, Mary, (neMcColl), Wild Bill had a tie with the fam-ily that founded the largest oil company inCanada, McColl-Frontenac. The companywas controlled by its U.S. investor, Tex-aco, part of John D. Rockefeller's originaloil trust monopoly. Wild Bill hired the 18-year-old Strong to be one of the "five menof the North" who built his New Horizon

Explorations Ltd. (NHE Ltd.) prospectingfirm. Wild Bill also acted as a spy, steal-

ing the mail of the National Council of Canadian-SovietFriendship, which shared offices in the same building as

NHE Ltd.s Toronto headquarters.

Through Wild Bill, Strong wasintroduced to many of the future

political leaders of Canadae.g., Paul Martin Sr., then Mem-

ber of Parliament for Windsorwho later helped advance hiscareer. Another important per-son whom Strong met at WildBill's home was Noah Monod,then treasurer of the United Na-tions, who invited Strong to

New York, where he introducedhim to David Rockefeller. Thiswas the start of a lifelong friend-ship and business relationship.For the rest of his career, every-where that Strong went, Rocke-feller money was sure to fol-low. (1)

(1) Scott Thompson, Maurice Strong Exposes Al Gores Dark Age Cloak

of Green, Executive Intelligence Review, January 29, 1999, p. 24

Maurice Strong

Strong collaborator roller and fellow

cardboard cutout David Rockefeller


18/58

18

Maurice Strongs meteoric rise to power in internationalaffairs can only be understood as the effect of this earlyrecruitment to the networks steered by the Rockefellers andthe Council on Foreign Relations, themselves mere junior

partners in the Globally extended British Empire. The fol-lowing decade would see the world torn between two postwar impulses: that of an anti colonial defense of nationalsovereignty as the instrument for true development of sci-

ence and technological development on the one side, and arecolonization of nations under the control of a new AngloAmerican alliance.

Strong returned to Canada to become an oil analyst inCalgary firms such as Dome Exploration which was con-nected to Rockefellers Standard Oil though Strongs part-nership with Jack Gallagher, a man who had been a Stan-dard Oil executive for 12 years. Strong had spent over ayear beginning in 1951 working in Africa, taking a boat toMombassa Kenya, during the peak of the Mau Mau revolt.His African work would take him to Zanzibar, Tanzania,Uganda, Mauritius, Madagascar, Eritrea and the Congo.Throughout these adventures in collapsing colonial struc-tures, Strong worked for CalTex, which was a joint venture

between Texas Company and Socal.

Strongs world assignment would take him to India, SriLanka, Hong Kong and the Philippines, arriving back toCanada in 1954. At this point, Strong returned to work forDome and now also including work with the YMCA intohis portfolio. YMCA served as a valuable intelligence insti-tution as its powerful worldwide networks were unique inthat they crossed all Cold War barriers. It was one of thefew Western organizations that maintained its facilities inEastern Europe as well as mainland China.

Elaine Dewar writes in Cloak of Green that it was in thesummer of 1955 Strong took a detour to Geneva and intro-duced himself to his very distant American cousin RobbinsStrong. The Y had just appointed him the ProfessionalSecretary of its extension and inter-movement aid divisionwhich divvied up government and private money for aid

projects. These moneys were moved discreetly around theworld by the Swiss banks of Geneva. Leonard Hentsch of

the private bank of Hentsch etCie. was the division's treas-urer that year. Strong andHentsch became friends andlater, business partners. In duecourse, the two Strongs formedwhat Robbins referred to as "acabal" to reduce U.S. domi-nance of the Y's internationalsystem. As Robbins saw it,there were "problems" with theInternational Committee of theU.S.A. and Canada. By 1958,

at twenty-nine, Maurice Strong had got appointed to thatcommittee. (2)

Liberal Kingmakers and Power Corp. Already by 1956, Strong was a close friend of Paul MartinSr., who was getting ready to run for the leadership of theLiberal Party of Canada. Martin regularly visited Strong, athis house in Calgary.

Elaine Dewar continued: Strong picked this time to leaveDome, and form his own company, MF Strong Manage-ment. In 1960 Strong was an equity holder in Ajax Petro-leum, another "independent" oil company, when Paul Mar-tin's son, Paul Jr., came to work for him during his summervacation.

In 1961, Strong had been appointed chair of RobbinsStrong's international division at the Y, which gave Stronga reason to rent a house outside Geneva where he was fre-quently visited by Paul Martin Jr... That same year, Strong

became acquainted with Harold Rea, the new president ofthe Canadian YMCA and a man who ran an oil companycontrolled by Power Corporation in Montreal. Rea waslooking for a new president for Power Corporation. (3)

Power Corporation was (and still is) a control center for theBritish Empires management of Canada. It had been puttogether in 1925 to control the ownership of power genera-tion facilities across the country. Power Corporation wasrun by Peter Thomson Sr., head of Nesbitt Thomson, oneof the largest brokerage firms in Montreal and until themass provincial buyouts of their utilities in 1960-61, hadcontrolled the majority of energy systems, and oil acrossCanada.

Maurice Strong in Kenya during the Mau Mau uprising of 1954

Robbins Strong

(2) Elain Dewar, Cloak of Green, James Lorimer & co. publishers, To-

ronto, 1995, p.268

(3) Cloak of Green, p.269


19/58

19

The control of Power Corpo-ration moved to Peter N.Thompson Jr., upon the deathof his father. Thompson Jr.already had a massive influ-ence in the Quebec LiberalParty at this time (4). In Que-

bec, this British-run Anglo-

American machine, had beenused to defeat the Vatican-steered, nationalist party ofMaurice Duplessis, l'Union

Nationale, which had been inpower in Quebec, since the

end of WWII and had been a major pillar of resistanceagainst the imperial Malthusian / anti-technological growth

paradigm being enforced by the Organization for EconomicDevelopment (OECD) and UNESCO.

The method chosen by the British Empire operatingthrough the OECD and UNESCO was to split politics fromeconomics by inducing the bureaucratic/educational poli-cies of nations to be managed by the absolute logic of Sys-tems Analysis while the economic behaviour of nationswould become increasingly guided by adherence to theintrinsically irrational forces of the global free market (5).This artificial dualism would create a degree of chaos thatcould then be solved by the re-absorption of lost coloniesinternationally under the framework of a Global Govern-ance structure guided by the inbred families of the VenetianBlack Nobility and their lackeys.

During these years, Canada had no pesky rules to controlcampaign expenditures, no rules to force disclosure of cam-

paign contributions and few to forbid certain supportive

measures a politician might choose to take before, during,and after public life. Power Corporation employed and stillemploys persons who organize the campaigns of thoseseeking public office. Prime Minister Jean Chretien's chieforganizer for his leadership race and overall architect of hiselection victory in 1993 was John Rae (Liberal Party leaderBob Rae's brother), an executive and director at PowerCorp. As for Pierre Trudeau and his right-hand man Mi-chael Pitfield, they both occupied powerful positions in thecompany after their official retirement from public life.

By 1961 Maurice Strong was made executive Vice-President. When Strong arrived in Montreal, and in 1962,

after the power utility monopoly of Powercorp had beenbought out by various provinces, he became a senior execu-tive of one of the most important companies in the countryand also a player in the international YMCA network. Hedescribed the particular virtues of running Power Corp."We controlled many companies, controlled political budg-

ets. We influence a lot of appointments. ...Politician got toknow you and you them." (6)

Strong recruited to Power Corp more young men inter-ested in business and politics. He hired James D. Wolfen-sohn to run the new Australian-based subsidiary called Su-

per Power International. Wolfensohn went on to head theWorld Bank and then created his own firm, James D. Wolf-ensohn Co. making Paul Volker its president. Volcker later

joined Power Corp.s International Advisory Board. WhilePresident of the World Bank from 1995-2005, Wolfensohn

brought Strong in as his personal advisor(7).

International Affairs and the Penetra-

tion of Africa

There are three main sources of influence that interact inthe control of the Canadian political system. Two are realinfluences and one is merely illusory. The illusory source isthe public masquerade known as party democracy of theCommons. The second source has a real influence and it isthrough the corporate and financial establishment operatingthrough such clubs as the Empire Club, the CanadianCouncil of Chief Executives. Power Corp falls under thiscategory. Yet the second source merely carries out the in-tentions of a higher third source, and that is by far the mostimportant for any historian who wishes to honestly

Peter Thompson Jr.

(5) The method chosen by the British Empire operating through theOECD and UNESCO was to split politics from economics by inducingthe bureaucratic/educational policies of nations to be managed by theabsolute logic of Systems Analysis while the economic behaviour ofnations became increasingly guided by adherence to the intrinsicallyirrational forces of the global free market. This artificial dualism cre-ated a degree of chaos that could then be solved by the re -absorption oflost colonies internationally under the framework of a Global Governancestructure guided by the inbred families of the Venetian Black Nobility andtheir lackeys.

(4) This is from where, and from whom, Rene Levesque, the later founderof the separatist Parti Quebecois, got his start in official politics (6) Cloak of Green, p.270

(7) In a 1999 interview with EIR, Strong revealed that Wolfenson and heused this position to further transform the culture of the World Bank fromthe financing of large scale megaprojects to small local works, NGOs andcommunity control: He knew not just to rely just on the big mega-

projects, but to bring in the NGOs, the little people, citizens, religiousleaders, foundation leaders. Those things he already had in mind and onhis agenda, when he came. If I was any help, it was more a matter of help-ing him to actually implement some of those things.

Former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin Jr, Former Federal Reser-

ve Chair Paul Volcker, and former President of the World Bank James

Wolfensohn all got their start at Power Corp


20/58

20

Box 1:

Anna Strongs TrustBorn in Oak Lake, Manitoba, in 1929, Strong never completed more than 11 years of schooling. Yet powerful interests foundhim to be the ideal candidate for rapid promotion to wealth and power. One reason is undoubtedly his sponsorship by a mem-

ber of the American branch of his family, Anna Louise Strong, who is to all appearances a top-level member of whatEIR hasdetailed as "The Trust," on behalf of both Mao Zedong's China and the Soviet Union.Here is what Elaine Dewar writes about Anna Louise Strong in her groundbreaking 1995 expos Cloak of Green:

"Born a generation ahead of him [Maurice Strong] were his distant cousins Tracy and AnnaLouise Strong. The children of a Congregationalist missionary based in Friend, Nebraska,their lineage went all the way back to the men who helped endow Harvard and Yale. Chris-tian activist Tracy Strong became a director of the YMCA's Prisoners' Aid Committee Alli-ance, based in Geneva. Anna Louise Strong, his sister, was a Marxist and a journalist and

possibly a spy, although for whom it is difficult to be certain.

In 1921, she got into the new Soviet Union as part of a Quaker aid committee and got toknow members of the emerging Soviet hierarchy, including Trotsky; she wrote about thenew Soviet Union for theNation and for Hearst International. She became a member of theComintern, later married the Soviet Union's wartime deputy minister of agriculture (a manwho was purged later by Stalin). During the period between the two wars she traveled inChina, corresponded and dined with Eleanor Roosevelt...

She was treated with deep suspicion by the FBI, who thought she worked for Stalin's noto-rious spymaster Beria, but she also lectured at Stanford to U.S. intelligence personnelheaded to China. In fact, she was flown to China by the U.S. Navy right after the war's end.

She spent two years with Mao and Chou En-lai in the crucial period leading up to the defeat of the Kuomintang. When shereturned, she carried secret messages from Chou En-lai. She was arrested in 1949 during a trip to the U.S.S.R. as an Ameri-can spy.

After Mao was victorious in China, she was denied herU.S. passport, and her association with persons in the U.S.

State Department was listed as part of the grounds fortheir dismissals. Nevertheless, she managed to visit anephew working in Mexico working for the RockefellerFoundation and visit Guatemala in 1954 [the date of theCIA's coup d'tat against Jacobo Arbenz as an allegedCommunist], writing in praise of President Arbenz. Shereturned to China during the Cultural Revolution and diedthere in 1970, a full-fledged Friend of the Revolution, her

burial organized by Chou En-lai himself. In part becauseof his connections to Anna Louise Strong, the Chinesetrusted Maurice Strong."

It was not just the "Cultural Revolutionists" of Mao'sChina who trusted Maurice Strong because of this connec-

tion, but, also, such powerful families in the U.S. estab-lishment as the Rockefellers, who were his early promot-ers and lifelong friends.

-Scott Thompson

Chairman Mao and Anna Louise Strong in 1965

Anna Louise Strong


21/58

21

evaluate causes in the changes of Canadian history. It is atthis level that we find the true fount of power to be the nighomnipotent Privy Council Office, and Governor General,through which everything else is directed at the behest ofthe London Foreign Office, and under the absolute author-ity of the Monarchy. Strongs role, as a talented thoughobedient enforcer of the imperial will of London, must beclearly understood in order to shed some light on the third,

higher level that exerts political control over Canada.

The highest authority governing Canadian national, foreignand corporate policy is channelled through the manipula-tions of British operatives working through the Privy Coun-cil Office, and the Canadian Institute for International Af-fairs (CIIA) (8), operatives such as Walter Lockhart Gordonwho led in the re-organization of the Liberal governmentunder Lester B. Pearson. Gordon and Pearson both becameclose friends with Maurice Strong as early as 1963.

Dewar writes that after the Liberal government came topower in 1963, Power Corp funded think tanks to makepublic platforms to sell the political agenda of the new gov-ernment. Jim Coutts, Pearsons Principal Secretary, intro-duced Strong to Finance Minister Walter Gordon, then pro-

posing a Canadian Development Corporation to help Cana-dian companies compete globally. Strong gave speeches insupport. Power Corporations meetings at Mont Tremblant

became semi-public stages to test market the not-yet-widely-known but politically interested, such as Pierre Tru-deau. (9)

Pearson, upon becoming Prime Minister, quickly chosePaul Martin Sr. as his Foreign Minister. By 1966, Maurice

Strong became President of YMCACanada and also joined the Exter-

nal Aid section of the CanadianDepartment of External Affairs,overseeing all foreign aid to thirdworld countries. As the head ofYMCA, Strong pulled the Cana-dian Y out of its special relation-ship with the U.S. on the Interna-tional Committee. Canada had noembassies in French Africa, andPresident Charles de Gaulle was

pushing all former French Africancolonies to create direct contactswith the government of Quebec, by

-passing the federal government ofCanada. Maurice Strongs assignment was to ensure that nosuch alliance would occur following de Gaulles intention.

Pearson's Liberal Party needed a flexible solution. A lay-ered solution was found. Both the re-colonization of Africa,as well as the subversion of de Gaulles project of true de-

velopment could be done through development aid pro-grams for France's former colonies. The use of "aid" in thisfashion fitted with the new American foreign policy towardAfrica. The assassination of Kennedy opened the door to

the Rockefeller control and management of U.S. foreign"aid" programs in Africa. Under the umbrella of Britishcontrol, both Canadian and American policy converged asfar as Africa was concerned: Stop de Gaulle's development

programs, and go for a grab of raw materials. The impulsewhich created USAID in 1962 was a good idea, but its po-tential for good immediately died with Kennedy in 1963 (10).USAID from that point on became a strong arm, or "Strongarm" for Malthusian genocide against de Gaulle's anti-colonial development programs.

Strong had assigned Pierre Trudeau the task of conductingbroad intelligence in French speaking African countries inorder to undo the mess de Gaulle was making for the Brit-ish designs for re-colonization. Dewar notes that Trudeausreport to Ottawa led to a larger mission headed by formerPresident of the Privy Council Lionel Chevrier [formerPresident of the Privy Council- ed], who's orders were to goto French Africa and say yes to whatever French Africanleaders wanted Since he had almost no staff at ExternalAid, Strong made a deal with SNC (now SNC-Lavalin), theQuebec-based engineering company, to offer technical fa-cilities to the External Aid in Africa. (11) SNC acted as ago-between the government and the actual on-the-groundcontractors. Trudeaus efficiency at this task found himrewarded within months with the title of Justice Minister; ayear later and he was elected Prime Minister.

This work set the basis for the formation of the CanadianInternational Development Agency (CIDA) which Strongcreated in 1968. CIDA would replace External Aid andanother organization would soon be created alongside it

(8) The CIIA was re-named the Canadian International Council (CIC) in

2009

(9) Cloak of Green p. 272

Paul Martin Sr.

President de Gaulles intervention to create a global Francopho-

nie of cooperation and development had to be stopped. The Ca-nadian government under the Liberal Party was re-organized

with the help of Strong to do just that.

(10) As is documented in Permindex Ties Revealed to JFK Murder, 1001

Club on p. 38 of this issue, Maurice Strong and the 1001 Club intelligence

network he was a part of played an integral role in coordinating the JFK

assassination.

(11) Cloak of Green, p. 273


22/58

22

called the International Develop-ment Research Center (IDRC).The difference was that whileCIDA was a Government runCrown Corporation, IDRC was a

partial Non-Governmental Or-ganization, which allowed it toreceive private tax deductible do-

nations and make donations di-rectly to individuals and privateorganizations without goingthrough national governments. Its

board of governors would be par-tially private, and partially gov-

ernment. Maurice Strong became the Chairman of IDRC inOctober 1970, replacing its founding Chair Lester Pearson.

Using the same model as USAID, CIDA operates a tied-aidprogram, which means that when CIDA gives aid to, forexample, the Congo, in return Congo may have to purchaseits "goods and services" from select corporations in Canada,or Britain. Strong's hand-picked people in Africa wereimbedded in various private companies as a cover. Thistype of approach went far in creating local oligarchiesand bureaucratic elites in former colonies. This factor ofcontrolled corruption would be continuously used to ma-nipulate former colonies into decades of intrigues and civilwars organized always from forces in the Trans-Atlanticregion, far outside African borders.

Through his contacts in the YMCA, Strong ended up be-coming Secretary General of the U.N. Stockholm Confer-ence on the Human Environment in 1972, became a trustee

for the Rockefeller Founda-tion from 1971-77.

Two of the by-products ofthe Stockholm Conferencewere the use and expansionof Non-Governmental Or-ganizations (NGOs) to1) encourage a bottom upthinking to solving prob-lems of underdevelopment,thus negating all means ofacting on systemic causes toworld problems, and 2)advance the creation of anew British intelligence andMalthusian front, as part ofthe U.N. structure: TheUnited Nations Environ-mental Program (UNEP).Dewar writes: In 1974, theUNEP rose out of the un-derdeveloped soil of Nai-

robi, Kenya, Strong's old stomping ground After the YomKippur War in 1973, Nairobi became the spy capital of Af-rica and Strong became UNEP's first Executive Direc-tor. (12)

By January 1976, Strong had become a Trustee of theRockefeller Foundation, and would be assigned to run PetroCanada, the first state owned Oil company begun by Pierre

Trudeau in response to the 1973 Yom Kippur war and oilshocks that followed. Petro Canada provided a medium toenter into regions that no private U.S. based oil companycould enter such as the waters between Viet Nam andChina. taught other government run oil companies in othercountries how to deal with natives.

RIO and Global Governance

In 1992, Strong had been assigned to head the secondEarth Summit (the first having been the 1972 StockholmConference on the Human Environment also chaired byStrong).The Rio Summit had established a new era in theconsolidation of NGOs and corporations under the geno-cidal green agenda of controlled starvation masquerading

behind the dogma of sustainability.

This doctrine would be formalized with Agenda 21 and theEarth Charter, co-authored by Mikhail Gorbachev, JimMacNeill and Strong. At the opening of the Rio Summit,Strong announced that industrialized countries haddeveloped and benefited from the unsustainable patterns

of production and consumption which have produced ourpresent dilemma. It is clear that current lifestyles and con-sumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involvinghigh meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozenand convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home

and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing-are not sustainable. A shift is necessary toward lifestyles

Maurice Strong as first Chair-man of the UN Stockholm

Conference in 1972

Lester B. Pearson

(12) Cloak of Green, p. 279Strong and Gorbachev at Rio in 1992


23/58

23

less geared to environmentally damaging consumptionpatterns."

In an essay entitled from Stockholm to Rio: A JourneyDown a Generation, Strong wrote:

The concept of national sovereignty has been an immuta-ble, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. Itis a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantlyto the new imperatives of global environmental coopera-tion. What is needed is recognition of the reality that in somany fields, and this is particularly true of environmentalissues, it is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exer-cised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however

powerful. The global community must be assured of envi-ronmental security.

The Destruction of Nuclear Power

This biography couldnt be complete if we didnt return toStrongs role in destroying Canadas nuclear potential, oneof the greatest beacons of hope mankind has to break outof the current fixed boundaries to humanitys develop-ment. Indeed, the controlled use of the atom and the neces-sary discovery of new universal principles associated withthis endeavour has always represented one of the greateststrategic threats to the oligarchic system which depends ona closed system of fixed resources in order to both managecurrent populations and justify global governance underobjective frameworks of logic. Fission and fusion proc-esses exist on a level far outside those fixed parametersthat the earths carrying capacity is no greater than 2

billion souls. If mankind were to recognize his uniquecreative potential to continuously transcend his limitationsby discovering and creating new resources, no empirecould long exist. With Canada as the second nation to havecivilian nuclear power, and a frontier science culture in

physics and chemistry, the need to destroy this potential inthe mind of the proprietors of Canada was great indeed.

To get a better sense of the anti-nuclear role Strong hasplayed in Canadian science policy, we must actually go

back once again to Strongs rein at the Department of Ex-

ternal Aid in 1966.

A key reason that Strong had been brought into CanadasCivil Service to head up the External Aid office in 1966was to sabotage the international efforts leading scientistsand statesmen had achieved in making Canada an exporterof its original CANDU reactors. Since 1955, leading patri-

ots within Atomic Energy Canada Ltd. (AECL) and theNational Research Council such as C.D. Howe and hiscollaborator C.W. Mackenzie, the exporting of nuclear

power technology was advanced to developing countriessuch as India and Pakistan. The banners under which thisadvanced technology transfer occurred was both theColumbo Plan and President Dwight Eisenhowers Atomsfor Peace. This progressive approach to international de-velopment defined external aid not around IMF condi-tionalities, or simply money for its own sake, but rather asthe transfer of the most advanced science and technologyto poor countries with the explicit intention that all nationswould attain true sovereignty.

When Strong got to work in External Aid, and later formedCIDA (discussed above), Canadas relationship toLDCs (lesser developed countries) became reduced toadvancing appropriate technologies under the frame-work of monetarism and systems analysis. No technologyor advanced infrastructure policy necessary for the inde-

pendence of former colonies would be permitted under thisprecursor to what later became known as sustainabilityand zero growth. Under Strongs influence, Canadasrole became perverted into inducing LDCs to become obe-dient to IMF conditionalities and the reforms of their

bureaucracies demanded by the OECD in order to receivemoney. Both in Canada and in developing countries,

Strong was among the key agents who oversaw the imple-mentation of the OECDs strategy of Systems Analysisfor national policy management.

Maurice Strong, shakes hands in Rio de Janeiro with Brazilianindigenous tribe chief . Photograph: Antonio Scorza/AFP

Atoms for Peace catalyzed by President Eisenhower, along-

side the Columbo Plan promised to usher in a new age of

reason through development.


24/58

24

In his role as President of PetroCanada, Strong endorsed thenational call to create a nuclearmoratorium for Canada whichhad been carried out by the Ca-nadian Coalition for Nuclear

Responsibility in 1977. Thisdocument not only demanded animmediate halt to the continua-tion of all reactors then underconstruction, but made the so-

phistical argument that morejobs could be created ifecologically friendly energysources and conservation meth-ods were developed instead of

nuclear and fossil fuels (13). Strange desires from an oil ex-ecutive, but not so strange considering his 1978-1981 roleas Vice President of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), anorganization founded by the British and Dutch monarchiesas a Royal Dutch Shell initiative in 1961. Strong was VicePresident during the same interval that WWF co-founderPrince Phillip was its President. In September 1976, Strongwrote in the Montreal Gazette:

No other large animal has used the planets resources so

extravagantly. Mans skills, the technical success with

which he overspreads the earth, makes him the most dan-gerous of all creatures We must surely break from this

pattern of energy expansionand stress instead its conserva-tion and re-allocation... it isvain to hope that sudden tech-

nological breakthroughs willsolve our national and globalenergy shortages Our energy

problems cannot be solved bythe unthinking advocacy of any-ones pet projects, whether

those schemes are fusion reac-tors or solar cookers.

While still heading up the Ex-ternal Aid Department in 1967,Strong had co-founded the 1001Club as an elite internationalorganization which was used to

finance the emerging green agenda for world governance.In this position, Strong recruited 80 Canadian initiates tothis elite society otherwise known as Strongs Kindergar-den [see appendix], the most prominent being Lord Con-rad Black, Barrick Golds Peter Munk and Permindexs lateMajor Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. As documented else-

where, the latter had been at the heart of the plot to assassi-nate President John F. Kennedy [See article on page 38].

The Case of Ontario Hydro

By 1992, Strong had completed his role heading the Rio

Earth Summit in Brazil and had returned to his native landto attempt to finalize the dismantling of Canadas nuclearprogram in his new assignment as President of OntarioHydro, a position he held from 1992 to 1995 under the for-mal invitation of Bob Rae, then NDP Premier of Ontarioand brother of Power Corp.s John Rae. Bob Rae wouldlater serve as the leader of the Lib

The Canadian Patriot #5

Documents

Transcript of The Canadian Patriot #5