The Birth Of Digital Imaging
-
Upload
chris-sandstroem -
Category
Business
-
view
4.034 -
download
1
description
Transcript of The Birth Of Digital Imaging
The birth of digital imaging
Christian Sandström holds a PhD from Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden. He writes and speaks about disruptive innovation and technological change.
We tend to think of the
digital imaging revolution as
something that happened in the
early 2000s.
It is true that the displacement of film primarily happened from 2000 and on…
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Number of film and digital cameras sold in the United States.
But digital cameras had been around for a long time before the actual revolution.
Let’s go back in time and take a look at how the technology evolved and how it was followed
by journalists and companies.
The key component in a digital camera is the image sensor. Dr. Willard Boyle and Dr.
George Smith at Bell Labs created the first solid-state image sensor in 1969.
Sony among other companies understood the potential in this new technology and started
to experiment with it.
But it was Texas Instruments that patented the filmless electronic camera in 1972.
Fairchild Imaging was the first company to successfully launch a commercial image sensor in 1973. It was a black-
and-white sensor which had 0,1 Megapixels.
The Fairchild sensor was used when Kodak came up with the first prototype of a camera that used an image sensor
in 1975.
The man behind the camera was an engineer at Kodak named Steven
Sasson (rumours say that he still works for the company).
It took 23 seconds for the camera to record an image onto a digital cassette tape.
The Associated Press made the following comment about the camera:
“An 8-pound, toaster-size contraption, which captured a black-and-white
image on a digital cassette tape at a resolution of .01 megapixel."
Quite an interesting comment about a technology that 25 years later would turn the entire camera industry upside down.
Throughout the 1970s, Fairchild and RCA among others further developed image sensors, primarily for usage related to
astronomy.
Digital imaging was superior to photographic plates when it came to gazing at distant
planets and galaxies.
Another early application of digital imaging was the transmission of images from space vehicles back home to earth (read more here).
In 1979, Emory Kristof was the first to use an electronic camera while photographing life at the
bottom of the ocean.
Electronic cameras were also used when Kristof took photos of Titanic at the bottom of the sea.
All these events have in common that they created quite some media attention.
Therefore, digital imaging became a bit of a hype in these years…
"What does this development mean? That the working newspaper photographer in the not-too-distance future could be using an electronic camera." // Edward Dooks photographer, 1979
"It sounds like it (the digital camera) could give us more speed, more time to do the selection and cropping of photographs and less time just doing the technical production of it.“ // Ralph Langer, Dallas Morning News 1984
"Electronic photography is going to replace the silver image. We are going to have to have an understanding of how to edit pictures, how pictures are stored electronically and how to edit them electronically." // Charles Scott, Photojournalism educator
"When the electronic camera, and all that goes with it, is finally in our hands -- and it will be -- it will not be because we have sought it out, but because we are no longer left with a choice.“
Ed Breen, News Photographer in 1982
While the technology received a lot of media coverage, it was still far away
from the mass markets.
Too complicated, poor image quality and too high price.
Further developments were made. The photo press continued to give plenty
of attention to the emerging technology.
In 1991, Associated Press published an article with the headline:
“Electronics Takes a Big Step
Closer to Replacing Film.”
”The quality of high-end digital studio cameras is good enough to replace film for most catalog and magazine needs.”
MacWEEK 94-05-13
6 million pixel resolution is good enough for most applications. The perception of colour is more important than the perception of sharpness.
Kodak, 1996
In an article titled “Cameras go digital: Prices for filmless cameras are falling fast” from 1996 states:
“One day in the not-too-distant future your point-and-shoot camera may go the way of the home movie camera and record turntable”.
In the 1990s, digital imaging prospered in the area of
studio photography.
Kodak made huge efforts to produce smaller, cheaper and better products…
Digital backs were
attached to medium format
cameras (this one’s a
Hasselblad with a Kodak digital back)
All these applications existed before the great imaging
revolution.
When looking back at the media coverage and the discussions
about digital imaging it is striking how much attention the technology received in relation to how small the
markets were.
This observation suggests that the camera industry was by no means surprised by the
shift to digital imaging once it happened.
Some firms may have underestimated the pace at which the technology went from strange niche markets
into a mass market.
But most of them succeeded in anticipating the threat at an
early point. Responding in the right way, at the right time,
turned out to be more difficult.
Sources
McGarvey, Jim, The DCS Story, 2004.
Image attributions