The Big Hoax of TrinityRefuted in Qu’ran and

The Bible

And (remember) when Allah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): 'O 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) ! Did you say unto men: Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allah?' He will say: 'Glory be to you! It was not for me to say that which I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would have surely known it. You know what is in my inner-self though I do not know what is in Yours, truly, You, only You, are the All-Knower of all that is hidden and unseen.‘ 'Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allah) did command me to say: "Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.“ [Al-Qur'an, 5: 116-117]

God says in the Holy Quran:

They have certainly disbelieved who say, "Allah is the third of three." And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment. (5:73)

All the prophets called their nations to monotheism, it is the cornerstone on which all religions are based.

Christianity, owing to human interpolations changed from a monotheistic religion into polytheistic religion.

Modern studies have found a lot of parallels between Christianity and pagan religions that are based on Trinity, the atoning-god, the son god.

And also God says in the Holy Quran:

The word trinity is nowhere mentioned in the Bible.The Jews also reject the trinity, in addition to the very first

groups of Christianity such as the Ebonites, the Corinthians, the Basilidians, the Capocratians, and the Hypisistarians never know about trinity doctrine at all. The Arians, Paulicians and Goths also accepted Jesus (peace be upon him) as a prophet of God and against the trinity.

Even in the modern age there are churches in Asia, in Africa, the Unitarian church, the Jehovah's witnesses, and even the majority of today's Anglican Bishops do not worship Jesus as one in three.

Evidences to the falsehood of Trinity

Moreover, the 'Socinianism', the 17th-century Christian also rejects such traditional doctrines as the Trinity and original sin.

It was forced onto Christianity and decided in the first synagogue.

Jesus called for the worship of God alone. No where in the Old Testament did any of the

prophets mentioned refer to the Trinity

There are over 200 verses in the Bible that proclaim the unity of God, the Only Creator and the only Savior. The following verses are just samples:

Exodus 20:3 "Thou shalt have no other gods before me."

Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is One LORD"

Isaiah 43:3 "For I am the LORD thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Savior."

Isaiah 44:6 "I am the First, and I am the Last, and beside me there is no god."

The Holy Book calls for the Unity of God

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.( John1:5:7)

1. The above verses exist only in the authorized King James Version,2. The King James Version has grave defects. 3. Now this part, "the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and

these three are one" has been removed in the Revised Standard Version of 1952 and 1971, and many other Bibles.

4. In the New Revised Standard, 1989, those same verses read as follows: "There are three that testify, the Spirit and the water and the blood, and these three agree."

The Authenticity of ( John1:5:7) Questionable

7. In John 14:11, it states that Jesus said," Believe me that I

am in the Father, and the Father in me." And in John 17:21

"They (the disciples) all may be one; as Thou, Father, art in

me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us.“

8. It is clear from the first verse that God and Jesus are one,

but also in the second verse that the disciples are one in

God and in Jesus. Now if Jesus is God because Jesus is in

God, why are not the disciples being recognized as gods,

as they all are one in Jesus and in God?

John 14:11 misunderstood

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit…(Matthew 28:19 )

Matthew 28:19 is unreliable

• Eusebius (c. 260'c. 340) was the Bishop of Caesarea and is known as "the Father of Church History." Although he wrote prolifically, his most celebrated work is his Ecclesiastical History, a history of the Church from the Apostolic period until his own time. Today it is still the principal work on the history of the Church at that time. Eusebius quotes many verses in his writings, and Matthew 28:19 is one of them. He never quotes it as it appears today in modern Bibles, but always finishes the verse with the words "in my name." For example, in Book III of his History, Chapter 5, Section 2, which is about the Jewish persecution of early Christians, we read

• But the rest of the apostles, who had been incessantly plotted against with a view to their destruction, and had been driven out of the land of Judea, went unto all nations to preach the Gospel, relying upon the power of Christ, who had said to them, "Go ye and make disciples of all the nations in my name.“

http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/matthew_28_19__by_biblical_unitarian_and_misha_al_ibn_abdullah_al_kadhi

Also note that the verse is true in its present words( which I don’t scholars see it) there are still grammatical and linguistic: the word and that separate the father, the son and the Holy Ghost….these are three persons while trinity says one god.

If Matthew 28:19 is accurate as it stands in modern versions, then there is no explanation for the apparent disobedience of the apostles, since there is not a single occurrence of them baptizing anyone according to that formula.

• Peter replied, 'Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins'" (Acts 2:38). "They had simply been baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 8:16). "So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" (Acts 10:48). "On hearing this, they were baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 19:5).

• In reading the book of Matthew, we note that there is no

presentation of the doctrine of the Trinity. Some prominent

Trinitarians doubt that the apostles were even introduced to

the doctrine until after they received holy spirit. It would be

strange indeed for Christ to introduce the doctrine of the Trinity

here in the next-to-last verse in the book without it being

mentioned earlier. [For further study on the subject of baptism,

read "Two Baptisms: Which Is Which?"]

• How can an important doctrine as such wasn’t said by Jesus

himself.

It is said that Luke was among those in whose presence these words were said but he didn't mention it in his bible- this is a sign that this verse was added later.

They worship me in vain; their teachings are

but rules taught by men.'“( Mathew:15:9)