the barrister - WordPress.com · sophisticated legal research products ever developed. ......
Transcript of the barrister - WordPress.com · sophisticated legal research products ever developed. ......
3
the barristerISSN 1468-926X
PRICE pound28012TH JUNE - 31ST JULY 2012
Features
News
Publishing Director Derek Payne0845 5190 176email infobarristermagazinecomPublishers media management corporation ltdDesign and Production Alan Pritchardemail infosoinspiremeuk
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
53
p6
Business Innovation ndash is the Bar being left behind
TRINITY TERM ISSUE
ESSENTIAL READING FOR BARRISTERS
wwwbarr istermagazinecom
EST 1999
The LASPO Bill ndash A Bill We Cannot Afford
7
12
22
23
Forensic Science Stirred not Shaken
The landscape of forensic service provision in the UK has undergone seismic changes during the last decade culminatingwith the controlled wind-down of the Forensic Science Service this year
By Dr Brian McKeown Chief Scientist LGC Forensics
Reforming Magistrates
The criminal justice system is going through a period of significant and sustained reform The financial crisis has shone a light on longstanding inefficiencies in the system
By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
IT Sets The Bar
Considering the current legal landscape and comparing it to the landscape of yesteryear significant changes are apparent Gone are the days of being able to manage Chambers using t-cards and a paper diary
By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Every day it seems a new way of putting
solicitors in front of potential clients hits
the headlines
Quality Solicitors not four years old yet
is looking positively grandfatherly has
attracted substantial outside investment
and is investing millions in prime-time TV
advertising Its path from bright idea to big
business has been lightening quick
Therersquos High Street Lawyer Lawyers2you
and latterly Instant Law springing up on
the high street in shopping centres and in
public libraries Wersquove had for a long time
now a whole galaxy of mainly PI lawyers
advertising on
afternoon TV and
there are affinity
groups like the
successful ones
run by Pannone
and 360 Legal
Wersquove got virtual
law firms on-line
advice and in
the autumn the
market leader in
the USA for on-line
documents Rocket
On 17th July 1970 the UKrsquos first Law Centre in North Kensington opened According to Coming of Age which was published by the Law Centre in 1988 its objective was to create a service ldquoanalogous to that provided by the traditional family doctorrdquo It went on to state
ldquohellipthe lawyers working there would become accepted as part of the community which would help break down the anxiety prevalent among poor people and likely to inhibit them from obtaining help even though they have a good caserdquo Law Centres are not-for-profit organisations which provide free legal advice and representation to local communities predominantly in relation to housing
debt employment and welfare benefits Law Centres are used by some of the most vulnerable members of society including the victims of political torture domestic violence victims people with substance abuse problems and people with severe mental health issues
In the latter half of the 20th century Law Centres quickly became powerful players on the legal landscape facilitating access to justice in local communities
By the 1990s however the Law Centre movement was experiencing considerable financial difficulties The 21st century has brought a fresh wave of financial challenges and in the last 5 years at least 12 Law Centres have closed p10
Ian DoddBar Consultancy Network
The search that delivers results
Not only does JustCite show you how cases legislation and articles cite and relate to each other it harnesses the power of this
citation network to help you nd leading authorities in seconds Advanced search algorithms integrated citation analysis visualisation
tools and editorial content come together to make JustCite one of the most sophisticated legal research products ever developed
Visit wwwjustcitecombarrister2012 for a free trial and see for yourself how JustCite can change the way you search the law
Barrister magazine advert for June 2012indd 1 20042012 110332
03the barrister
Forensic Science Stirred not Shaken By Dr Brian McKeown Chief Scientist LGC Forensics
The landscape of
forensic service
provision in the UK
has undergone seismic
changes during the last
decade culminating
with the controlled wind-down of the
Forensic Science Service this year
Much comment has been made about
the impact this will have on service
delivery impartiality of evidence and
also future research developments in
the field Should the Criminal Justice
System be unnerved or are these
changes rather a reflection of a mature
and stable discipline operating under
strict codes of practice and benefiting
from commercial acumen and a need to
outperform alternative suppliers
In the late 1990s a meeting of the
then recently established DNA
Database Suppliersrsquo Group was held in
Birmingham The gathering was chaired
by Dr Dave Werrett who was at the
time the Deputy Director of the Forensic
Science Service (FSS) the organisation
responsible for the birth of the National
DNA Database (NDNAD) The FSS was
the Custodian of the Database and
also its single biggest lsquosupplierrsquo of DNA
profiles The NDNAD is a fitting epitaph
for the now disbanded FSS and an
accomplishment that was possible in
no small measure due to a large and
dedicated RampD team
However even in the late 1990s things
were changing and in recognition of the
fact that the world of forensic casework
provision was opening up to commercial
competition with non-FSS labs also
uploading DNA profiles to the Database
Dr Werrett commenced the Birmingham
meeting by enquiring ldquoOkay I see the same faces around the table who do you work for this timerdquo The comment
although light-hearted acknowledged
that many forensic scientists have
by choice worked for many different
forensic providers during their careers
Mobility enriches careers and gives a
broader perspective on best (and worst)
practices Over the past 20 years I have
myself worked for two government-
funded forensic suppliers and two
commercial providers Putting me in the
minority of forensic scientists I never
actually worked directly for the FSS In
common with my many colleagues who
have also moved between suppliers
from employer to employer my
professional integrity and desire to best
serve the Criminal Justice System (CJS)
has not diminished one iota If anything
it has strengthened under the recent
somewhat mischievous suggestions that
a commercial forensic supplier and its
staff might be thought of as less than
impartial by dint of where their monthly
salary originates
I can reassure you that my colleagues
regardless of current employer or
recent changes are driven by the same
motivations as you would hope all
forensic scientists are to provide an
excellent and complete service to the
CJS and to continue to advance the
science such that next year we will be
better than we are this year and that in
2014 wersquoll be better than 2013
Itrsquos important to stress that we will
only achieve improvements on what is
already an extremely efficient robust
informative and economical service
to the CJS and police if we continue to
invest time and money in RampD There is
no doubt however that the critical need
for ongoing RampD is well understood
and that the new face of forensics in
the UK will continue to invest through a
diversity of mechanisms
Forensic Research and Development
is in common with all RampD expensive
and never guaranteed of success at the
outset In many ways our world is akin
to that of lsquoBig Pharmarsquo where the cost of
developing a new drug is perhaps in the
region of $800 million If only we had
that sort of firepower at our disposal
While many excellent drug therapies
already exist for the common diseases
that blight humanity to develop a
new drug that performs perhaps only
marginally better may still costs around
$800 million It becomes difficult to
justify the eye-watering expense of
developing a new drug therapy with only
marginally greater efficacy to compete
with a perfectly good older therapy
that is no longer covered by patent
protection and now costs pennies from
a generic drug manufacturer Drug
companies approach this conundrum
by targeting radically new therapies
or by addressing unmet need diseases
that afflict ever-fewer individual
patients Another approach is to apply
an existing therapy to an unmet need
Itrsquos a good analogy as forensic RampD is
required on an ongoing basis not only
to reinvent radically those things we
already do to be much more effective
(by a variety of lsquobetterrsquo measures) but
also to address a diminishing number
of evidence types where no effective
laboratory investigation is currently
The search that delivers results
Not only does JustCite show you how cases legislation and articles cite and relate to each other it harnesses the power of this
citation network to help you nd leading authorities in seconds Advanced search algorithms integrated citation analysis visualisation
tools and editorial content come together to make JustCite one of the most sophisticated legal research products ever developed
Visit wwwjustcitecombarrister2012 for a free trial and see for yourself how JustCite can change the way you search the law
Barrister magazine advert for June 2012indd 1 20042012 110332
04 the barrister
possible Sensibly we also apply existing
technologies to novel applications On
an ongoing basis we incrementally
improve those things that are already
lsquogoodrsquo to be ever lsquobetterrsquo
There is so much still to do and many of
the inventions and developments yet to
come we almost certainly do not know
we actually need Science in general is
littered with technologies that are now
thought essential but which a priori
no-one ever knew we needed But how
can we continue to develop the service
we offer under increasing financial
pressures
The demise of the FSS undeniably
reduced the total UK investment in
forensic RampD The FSS in later days
spent upwards of pound6 million per
annum on RampD money that in the age
of austerity has not immediately been
reallocated to forensic RampD through
other mechanisms But there is growing
recognition that the commercial supply
model embraced by England and
Wales for ongoing forensic provision
cannot mean the suppliers bear the
undiluted burden of RampD expense if
that RampD is to be of substance Those
new mechanisms include a necessarily
closer working relationship between
the commercial suppliers of forensic
laboratory consumables such as DNA
testing kits the case-working forensic
laboratories and the (numerous)
academic institutions engaged in RampD
that could find application in forensic
use
Fundamental research in our universities
needs to be supported by access to
funding mechanisms that recognise
and value forensics as an end-point for
the research conducted To that end
the Research Councils UK (RCUK) and
the Forensic Science Society have been
working closely to facilitate a funding
stream for ongoing forensic research
and development ASpecial Interest
Group in Forensic Science is currently
being planned by the Technology
Strategy Board (TSB) drawing on the
various Research Councils in the UK
This is tangible progress
Within Europe there are 7 year
cycle funding streams available for
collaborative research that prima facie
appear generous Framework Program
7 is the best known ISEC being another
that has focused on forensics in the past
These funding streams are however
not directly accessible to commercial
enterprises working in isolation and so
collaborations with academia or other
governmental forensic labs are essential
Proposed research must also have a
demonstrable impact on the ability to
better serve the criminal justice system
across Europe as borders increasingly
have little impact on the movement of
individuals within the Community
Right now funding that could be
accessed for forensics via Brussels is
considerably under-spent This reflects
the fact that research projects are very
strictly evaluated from both scientific
and accounting standpoints rather than
a lack of interest in the funding
The UK forensics providers in England
and Wales are all small to medium
size enterprises (SMEs) and therefore
will qualify for a contribution toward
the cost of collaborative research We
would be remiss not to engage with this
funding mechanism given adequate
safeguards that acknowledge our
commercial position To ensure forensics
is successful in attracting support
from Europe the forensic community
must educate the various committees
that determine which specific areas of
application are to be entertained during
any given funding round The value of
forensics and its contribution to a safer
society is blatant to all who work in the
field We anticipate that a less emotive
approach to lobbying for greater
support in future will be required if we
are to ensure that forensics is properly
recognised by the committee lsquoOpinion
Membersrsquo individuals who identify the
precise areas of endeavour that will be
supported during any given funding
round
Of course the various forensic suppliers
serving the UK CJS will also continue to
invest directly in RampD to differentiate
their services from alternative suppliers
Within LGC for instance this includes
investing in expensive and demanding
research such as our particular
approach to rapid DNA analysis beyond
the confines of the laboratory millions
of pounds and many years of work by
an interdisciplinary team of scientists
engineers and technicians It will also
include the somewhat less glamorous
assessment of background levels of grey
cotton fibres in public areas a plotline
unlikely to feature on CSI but necessary
if we are to speak with authority about
the significance of identifying this fibre
type in the course of an investigation
Forensic science delivery and continuing
RampD is populated by the same type of
person (and often the same individuals)
that has always provided the service
dedicated impartial and keen as
mustard to see the service continue to
develop to better serve the CJS in the
future Although the financial strictures
under which we operate are real and
biting we are still routinely delivering
excellence and I believe we are still
capable of surprising you in the future
with what we have yet to invent
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
06 the barrister
Lawyer is coming to the UK
Thatrsquos just the tip of a solicitor-
driven thriving writhing
entrepreneurial culture of
invention and innovation
Solicitorsrsquo firms have invested immense
intellectual capital and hard cash into a
whole spectrum of new business ideas
The cynics and doubters say that theyrsquoll
all fail and itrsquos a flash in the pan
Certainly some wonrsquot make it but there
will be others to take their place More
will evolve and their nimble-minded
and sure-footed managers and investors
will see that they do Yet others will just
continue to build on and develop a great
idea and wersquoll soon wonder why we
never thought of it before
Meanwhile strategic alliances often
falling short of merger or takeover are
being fashioned between solicitorsrsquo firms
who see the synergy in collaboration
for individual contracts or in longer
term ventures Mergers of course are
still a major part of the fast-changing
landscape solicitors inhabit and a recent
survey by Andrew Otterburn of the Law
Consultancy Network showed that the
rate of mergers had doubled in 2011
and was set to follow that trend in 2012
Venture capital is looking for such
vehicles and the bigger law firms are
and will be investing in their noisy
smaller neighbours
What then of the Bar
While there are many things like
ownership amp management structure
and a slow-moving tradition which
might inhibit such rapid iconoclastic
business development at the Bar there is
certainly no lack of intellect intelligence
and resourcefulness Progress though
is slow and it might be time for the Bar
to shake off its torpor and join the race
before itrsquos left too far behind
Despite wise words of encouragement
from the Bar Councilrsquos Chairman in
2010 Nichols Green QC that barristersrsquo
chambers needed to be at least 70-strong
few mergers have taken place and the
average membership is still just below
40 The Bar seems to be unable to grasp
the benefits of merger and the strength
amp depth of a well-diversified team the
economies of scale and the obvious clout
the very big chambers now have and
are wielding Not only that but the Bar
seem to find insurmountable practical
difficulties in following promising starts
through and there are many tales about
mergers being abandoned in the early
stages It might well be time for the
Bar to consider alliances more from a
business standpoint than a view of the
personalities involved
There are some encouraging signs
though Recently Exchange Chambers
in Liverpool and Litigation Funding
(principally made up of barristers from
Ely Chambers in London) launched their
own privately-funded litigation services
Wersquove also had Riverview Law and
Artesian Law setting up Riverview look
like the out-sourced advocacy arm of
DLA Piper and has attracted a galaxy of
stars from existing chambers who work
for them whilst remaining in their own
chambers
Artesian Law are an interesting
proposition A small number of
forward-looking barristers broke away
from their original chambers and
have set up a partnership to explore
novel ways of working with clients in
crime Six barristers a solicitor and
an experienced practice manager have
created a platform from which they
offer a range of legal services in a
flexible and modern way Seeing the
opportunities that the LSA offers and
choosing to be regulated by the SRA
rather than the BSB who are yet fully
to consult on entity regulation this
represents another way to the market
Their model appears to be similar
to that which the Bar Consultancy
Network have developed and both
anticipate novel commercial fee-sharing
arrangements between barristers and
solicitors which avoid any possible
referral fee and conflict problems by
careful organisation amp management and
choice of regulator The Bar Consultancy
Network is working with small number
of chambers who are preparing for
the challenges and opportunities that
competitive tendering in legal aid
contracts will bring
The new world though is not without
its own problems The current
structure and financial management of
traditional chambers doesnrsquot allow for
the retention of profit or the ability
to build up enough working capital to
fund major expansions and business
initiatives Investment capital may be
even harder for the Bar to access as the
requirements of private equity providers
is liable to test the membership of most
chambers
The LSA has paved the way for an
ABS world and a surprising number are
being formed Solicitors have responded
with alacrity and new thinking Many
new law firms have sprung up and
are bringing a refreshing vigour to the
market The Bar has shown some signs
of joining in though for them speeding
to catch up must be top of the agenda
Ian Dodd Bar Consultancy Network
wwwbarconsultancynetworkcouk
p1
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
The search that delivers results
Not only does JustCite show you how cases legislation and articles cite and relate to each other it harnesses the power of this
citation network to help you nd leading authorities in seconds Advanced search algorithms integrated citation analysis visualisation
tools and editorial content come together to make JustCite one of the most sophisticated legal research products ever developed
Visit wwwjustcitecombarrister2012 for a free trial and see for yourself how JustCite can change the way you search the law
Barrister magazine advert for June 2012indd 1 20042012 110332
03the barrister
Forensic Science Stirred not Shaken By Dr Brian McKeown Chief Scientist LGC Forensics
The landscape of
forensic service
provision in the UK
has undergone seismic
changes during the last
decade culminating
with the controlled wind-down of the
Forensic Science Service this year
Much comment has been made about
the impact this will have on service
delivery impartiality of evidence and
also future research developments in
the field Should the Criminal Justice
System be unnerved or are these
changes rather a reflection of a mature
and stable discipline operating under
strict codes of practice and benefiting
from commercial acumen and a need to
outperform alternative suppliers
In the late 1990s a meeting of the
then recently established DNA
Database Suppliersrsquo Group was held in
Birmingham The gathering was chaired
by Dr Dave Werrett who was at the
time the Deputy Director of the Forensic
Science Service (FSS) the organisation
responsible for the birth of the National
DNA Database (NDNAD) The FSS was
the Custodian of the Database and
also its single biggest lsquosupplierrsquo of DNA
profiles The NDNAD is a fitting epitaph
for the now disbanded FSS and an
accomplishment that was possible in
no small measure due to a large and
dedicated RampD team
However even in the late 1990s things
were changing and in recognition of the
fact that the world of forensic casework
provision was opening up to commercial
competition with non-FSS labs also
uploading DNA profiles to the Database
Dr Werrett commenced the Birmingham
meeting by enquiring ldquoOkay I see the same faces around the table who do you work for this timerdquo The comment
although light-hearted acknowledged
that many forensic scientists have
by choice worked for many different
forensic providers during their careers
Mobility enriches careers and gives a
broader perspective on best (and worst)
practices Over the past 20 years I have
myself worked for two government-
funded forensic suppliers and two
commercial providers Putting me in the
minority of forensic scientists I never
actually worked directly for the FSS In
common with my many colleagues who
have also moved between suppliers
from employer to employer my
professional integrity and desire to best
serve the Criminal Justice System (CJS)
has not diminished one iota If anything
it has strengthened under the recent
somewhat mischievous suggestions that
a commercial forensic supplier and its
staff might be thought of as less than
impartial by dint of where their monthly
salary originates
I can reassure you that my colleagues
regardless of current employer or
recent changes are driven by the same
motivations as you would hope all
forensic scientists are to provide an
excellent and complete service to the
CJS and to continue to advance the
science such that next year we will be
better than we are this year and that in
2014 wersquoll be better than 2013
Itrsquos important to stress that we will
only achieve improvements on what is
already an extremely efficient robust
informative and economical service
to the CJS and police if we continue to
invest time and money in RampD There is
no doubt however that the critical need
for ongoing RampD is well understood
and that the new face of forensics in
the UK will continue to invest through a
diversity of mechanisms
Forensic Research and Development
is in common with all RampD expensive
and never guaranteed of success at the
outset In many ways our world is akin
to that of lsquoBig Pharmarsquo where the cost of
developing a new drug is perhaps in the
region of $800 million If only we had
that sort of firepower at our disposal
While many excellent drug therapies
already exist for the common diseases
that blight humanity to develop a
new drug that performs perhaps only
marginally better may still costs around
$800 million It becomes difficult to
justify the eye-watering expense of
developing a new drug therapy with only
marginally greater efficacy to compete
with a perfectly good older therapy
that is no longer covered by patent
protection and now costs pennies from
a generic drug manufacturer Drug
companies approach this conundrum
by targeting radically new therapies
or by addressing unmet need diseases
that afflict ever-fewer individual
patients Another approach is to apply
an existing therapy to an unmet need
Itrsquos a good analogy as forensic RampD is
required on an ongoing basis not only
to reinvent radically those things we
already do to be much more effective
(by a variety of lsquobetterrsquo measures) but
also to address a diminishing number
of evidence types where no effective
laboratory investigation is currently
The search that delivers results
Not only does JustCite show you how cases legislation and articles cite and relate to each other it harnesses the power of this
citation network to help you nd leading authorities in seconds Advanced search algorithms integrated citation analysis visualisation
tools and editorial content come together to make JustCite one of the most sophisticated legal research products ever developed
Visit wwwjustcitecombarrister2012 for a free trial and see for yourself how JustCite can change the way you search the law
Barrister magazine advert for June 2012indd 1 20042012 110332
04 the barrister
possible Sensibly we also apply existing
technologies to novel applications On
an ongoing basis we incrementally
improve those things that are already
lsquogoodrsquo to be ever lsquobetterrsquo
There is so much still to do and many of
the inventions and developments yet to
come we almost certainly do not know
we actually need Science in general is
littered with technologies that are now
thought essential but which a priori
no-one ever knew we needed But how
can we continue to develop the service
we offer under increasing financial
pressures
The demise of the FSS undeniably
reduced the total UK investment in
forensic RampD The FSS in later days
spent upwards of pound6 million per
annum on RampD money that in the age
of austerity has not immediately been
reallocated to forensic RampD through
other mechanisms But there is growing
recognition that the commercial supply
model embraced by England and
Wales for ongoing forensic provision
cannot mean the suppliers bear the
undiluted burden of RampD expense if
that RampD is to be of substance Those
new mechanisms include a necessarily
closer working relationship between
the commercial suppliers of forensic
laboratory consumables such as DNA
testing kits the case-working forensic
laboratories and the (numerous)
academic institutions engaged in RampD
that could find application in forensic
use
Fundamental research in our universities
needs to be supported by access to
funding mechanisms that recognise
and value forensics as an end-point for
the research conducted To that end
the Research Councils UK (RCUK) and
the Forensic Science Society have been
working closely to facilitate a funding
stream for ongoing forensic research
and development ASpecial Interest
Group in Forensic Science is currently
being planned by the Technology
Strategy Board (TSB) drawing on the
various Research Councils in the UK
This is tangible progress
Within Europe there are 7 year
cycle funding streams available for
collaborative research that prima facie
appear generous Framework Program
7 is the best known ISEC being another
that has focused on forensics in the past
These funding streams are however
not directly accessible to commercial
enterprises working in isolation and so
collaborations with academia or other
governmental forensic labs are essential
Proposed research must also have a
demonstrable impact on the ability to
better serve the criminal justice system
across Europe as borders increasingly
have little impact on the movement of
individuals within the Community
Right now funding that could be
accessed for forensics via Brussels is
considerably under-spent This reflects
the fact that research projects are very
strictly evaluated from both scientific
and accounting standpoints rather than
a lack of interest in the funding
The UK forensics providers in England
and Wales are all small to medium
size enterprises (SMEs) and therefore
will qualify for a contribution toward
the cost of collaborative research We
would be remiss not to engage with this
funding mechanism given adequate
safeguards that acknowledge our
commercial position To ensure forensics
is successful in attracting support
from Europe the forensic community
must educate the various committees
that determine which specific areas of
application are to be entertained during
any given funding round The value of
forensics and its contribution to a safer
society is blatant to all who work in the
field We anticipate that a less emotive
approach to lobbying for greater
support in future will be required if we
are to ensure that forensics is properly
recognised by the committee lsquoOpinion
Membersrsquo individuals who identify the
precise areas of endeavour that will be
supported during any given funding
round
Of course the various forensic suppliers
serving the UK CJS will also continue to
invest directly in RampD to differentiate
their services from alternative suppliers
Within LGC for instance this includes
investing in expensive and demanding
research such as our particular
approach to rapid DNA analysis beyond
the confines of the laboratory millions
of pounds and many years of work by
an interdisciplinary team of scientists
engineers and technicians It will also
include the somewhat less glamorous
assessment of background levels of grey
cotton fibres in public areas a plotline
unlikely to feature on CSI but necessary
if we are to speak with authority about
the significance of identifying this fibre
type in the course of an investigation
Forensic science delivery and continuing
RampD is populated by the same type of
person (and often the same individuals)
that has always provided the service
dedicated impartial and keen as
mustard to see the service continue to
develop to better serve the CJS in the
future Although the financial strictures
under which we operate are real and
biting we are still routinely delivering
excellence and I believe we are still
capable of surprising you in the future
with what we have yet to invent
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
06 the barrister
Lawyer is coming to the UK
Thatrsquos just the tip of a solicitor-
driven thriving writhing
entrepreneurial culture of
invention and innovation
Solicitorsrsquo firms have invested immense
intellectual capital and hard cash into a
whole spectrum of new business ideas
The cynics and doubters say that theyrsquoll
all fail and itrsquos a flash in the pan
Certainly some wonrsquot make it but there
will be others to take their place More
will evolve and their nimble-minded
and sure-footed managers and investors
will see that they do Yet others will just
continue to build on and develop a great
idea and wersquoll soon wonder why we
never thought of it before
Meanwhile strategic alliances often
falling short of merger or takeover are
being fashioned between solicitorsrsquo firms
who see the synergy in collaboration
for individual contracts or in longer
term ventures Mergers of course are
still a major part of the fast-changing
landscape solicitors inhabit and a recent
survey by Andrew Otterburn of the Law
Consultancy Network showed that the
rate of mergers had doubled in 2011
and was set to follow that trend in 2012
Venture capital is looking for such
vehicles and the bigger law firms are
and will be investing in their noisy
smaller neighbours
What then of the Bar
While there are many things like
ownership amp management structure
and a slow-moving tradition which
might inhibit such rapid iconoclastic
business development at the Bar there is
certainly no lack of intellect intelligence
and resourcefulness Progress though
is slow and it might be time for the Bar
to shake off its torpor and join the race
before itrsquos left too far behind
Despite wise words of encouragement
from the Bar Councilrsquos Chairman in
2010 Nichols Green QC that barristersrsquo
chambers needed to be at least 70-strong
few mergers have taken place and the
average membership is still just below
40 The Bar seems to be unable to grasp
the benefits of merger and the strength
amp depth of a well-diversified team the
economies of scale and the obvious clout
the very big chambers now have and
are wielding Not only that but the Bar
seem to find insurmountable practical
difficulties in following promising starts
through and there are many tales about
mergers being abandoned in the early
stages It might well be time for the
Bar to consider alliances more from a
business standpoint than a view of the
personalities involved
There are some encouraging signs
though Recently Exchange Chambers
in Liverpool and Litigation Funding
(principally made up of barristers from
Ely Chambers in London) launched their
own privately-funded litigation services
Wersquove also had Riverview Law and
Artesian Law setting up Riverview look
like the out-sourced advocacy arm of
DLA Piper and has attracted a galaxy of
stars from existing chambers who work
for them whilst remaining in their own
chambers
Artesian Law are an interesting
proposition A small number of
forward-looking barristers broke away
from their original chambers and
have set up a partnership to explore
novel ways of working with clients in
crime Six barristers a solicitor and
an experienced practice manager have
created a platform from which they
offer a range of legal services in a
flexible and modern way Seeing the
opportunities that the LSA offers and
choosing to be regulated by the SRA
rather than the BSB who are yet fully
to consult on entity regulation this
represents another way to the market
Their model appears to be similar
to that which the Bar Consultancy
Network have developed and both
anticipate novel commercial fee-sharing
arrangements between barristers and
solicitors which avoid any possible
referral fee and conflict problems by
careful organisation amp management and
choice of regulator The Bar Consultancy
Network is working with small number
of chambers who are preparing for
the challenges and opportunities that
competitive tendering in legal aid
contracts will bring
The new world though is not without
its own problems The current
structure and financial management of
traditional chambers doesnrsquot allow for
the retention of profit or the ability
to build up enough working capital to
fund major expansions and business
initiatives Investment capital may be
even harder for the Bar to access as the
requirements of private equity providers
is liable to test the membership of most
chambers
The LSA has paved the way for an
ABS world and a surprising number are
being formed Solicitors have responded
with alacrity and new thinking Many
new law firms have sprung up and
are bringing a refreshing vigour to the
market The Bar has shown some signs
of joining in though for them speeding
to catch up must be top of the agenda
Ian Dodd Bar Consultancy Network
wwwbarconsultancynetworkcouk
p1
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
03the barrister
Forensic Science Stirred not Shaken By Dr Brian McKeown Chief Scientist LGC Forensics
The landscape of
forensic service
provision in the UK
has undergone seismic
changes during the last
decade culminating
with the controlled wind-down of the
Forensic Science Service this year
Much comment has been made about
the impact this will have on service
delivery impartiality of evidence and
also future research developments in
the field Should the Criminal Justice
System be unnerved or are these
changes rather a reflection of a mature
and stable discipline operating under
strict codes of practice and benefiting
from commercial acumen and a need to
outperform alternative suppliers
In the late 1990s a meeting of the
then recently established DNA
Database Suppliersrsquo Group was held in
Birmingham The gathering was chaired
by Dr Dave Werrett who was at the
time the Deputy Director of the Forensic
Science Service (FSS) the organisation
responsible for the birth of the National
DNA Database (NDNAD) The FSS was
the Custodian of the Database and
also its single biggest lsquosupplierrsquo of DNA
profiles The NDNAD is a fitting epitaph
for the now disbanded FSS and an
accomplishment that was possible in
no small measure due to a large and
dedicated RampD team
However even in the late 1990s things
were changing and in recognition of the
fact that the world of forensic casework
provision was opening up to commercial
competition with non-FSS labs also
uploading DNA profiles to the Database
Dr Werrett commenced the Birmingham
meeting by enquiring ldquoOkay I see the same faces around the table who do you work for this timerdquo The comment
although light-hearted acknowledged
that many forensic scientists have
by choice worked for many different
forensic providers during their careers
Mobility enriches careers and gives a
broader perspective on best (and worst)
practices Over the past 20 years I have
myself worked for two government-
funded forensic suppliers and two
commercial providers Putting me in the
minority of forensic scientists I never
actually worked directly for the FSS In
common with my many colleagues who
have also moved between suppliers
from employer to employer my
professional integrity and desire to best
serve the Criminal Justice System (CJS)
has not diminished one iota If anything
it has strengthened under the recent
somewhat mischievous suggestions that
a commercial forensic supplier and its
staff might be thought of as less than
impartial by dint of where their monthly
salary originates
I can reassure you that my colleagues
regardless of current employer or
recent changes are driven by the same
motivations as you would hope all
forensic scientists are to provide an
excellent and complete service to the
CJS and to continue to advance the
science such that next year we will be
better than we are this year and that in
2014 wersquoll be better than 2013
Itrsquos important to stress that we will
only achieve improvements on what is
already an extremely efficient robust
informative and economical service
to the CJS and police if we continue to
invest time and money in RampD There is
no doubt however that the critical need
for ongoing RampD is well understood
and that the new face of forensics in
the UK will continue to invest through a
diversity of mechanisms
Forensic Research and Development
is in common with all RampD expensive
and never guaranteed of success at the
outset In many ways our world is akin
to that of lsquoBig Pharmarsquo where the cost of
developing a new drug is perhaps in the
region of $800 million If only we had
that sort of firepower at our disposal
While many excellent drug therapies
already exist for the common diseases
that blight humanity to develop a
new drug that performs perhaps only
marginally better may still costs around
$800 million It becomes difficult to
justify the eye-watering expense of
developing a new drug therapy with only
marginally greater efficacy to compete
with a perfectly good older therapy
that is no longer covered by patent
protection and now costs pennies from
a generic drug manufacturer Drug
companies approach this conundrum
by targeting radically new therapies
or by addressing unmet need diseases
that afflict ever-fewer individual
patients Another approach is to apply
an existing therapy to an unmet need
Itrsquos a good analogy as forensic RampD is
required on an ongoing basis not only
to reinvent radically those things we
already do to be much more effective
(by a variety of lsquobetterrsquo measures) but
also to address a diminishing number
of evidence types where no effective
laboratory investigation is currently
The search that delivers results
Not only does JustCite show you how cases legislation and articles cite and relate to each other it harnesses the power of this
citation network to help you nd leading authorities in seconds Advanced search algorithms integrated citation analysis visualisation
tools and editorial content come together to make JustCite one of the most sophisticated legal research products ever developed
Visit wwwjustcitecombarrister2012 for a free trial and see for yourself how JustCite can change the way you search the law
Barrister magazine advert for June 2012indd 1 20042012 110332
04 the barrister
possible Sensibly we also apply existing
technologies to novel applications On
an ongoing basis we incrementally
improve those things that are already
lsquogoodrsquo to be ever lsquobetterrsquo
There is so much still to do and many of
the inventions and developments yet to
come we almost certainly do not know
we actually need Science in general is
littered with technologies that are now
thought essential but which a priori
no-one ever knew we needed But how
can we continue to develop the service
we offer under increasing financial
pressures
The demise of the FSS undeniably
reduced the total UK investment in
forensic RampD The FSS in later days
spent upwards of pound6 million per
annum on RampD money that in the age
of austerity has not immediately been
reallocated to forensic RampD through
other mechanisms But there is growing
recognition that the commercial supply
model embraced by England and
Wales for ongoing forensic provision
cannot mean the suppliers bear the
undiluted burden of RampD expense if
that RampD is to be of substance Those
new mechanisms include a necessarily
closer working relationship between
the commercial suppliers of forensic
laboratory consumables such as DNA
testing kits the case-working forensic
laboratories and the (numerous)
academic institutions engaged in RampD
that could find application in forensic
use
Fundamental research in our universities
needs to be supported by access to
funding mechanisms that recognise
and value forensics as an end-point for
the research conducted To that end
the Research Councils UK (RCUK) and
the Forensic Science Society have been
working closely to facilitate a funding
stream for ongoing forensic research
and development ASpecial Interest
Group in Forensic Science is currently
being planned by the Technology
Strategy Board (TSB) drawing on the
various Research Councils in the UK
This is tangible progress
Within Europe there are 7 year
cycle funding streams available for
collaborative research that prima facie
appear generous Framework Program
7 is the best known ISEC being another
that has focused on forensics in the past
These funding streams are however
not directly accessible to commercial
enterprises working in isolation and so
collaborations with academia or other
governmental forensic labs are essential
Proposed research must also have a
demonstrable impact on the ability to
better serve the criminal justice system
across Europe as borders increasingly
have little impact on the movement of
individuals within the Community
Right now funding that could be
accessed for forensics via Brussels is
considerably under-spent This reflects
the fact that research projects are very
strictly evaluated from both scientific
and accounting standpoints rather than
a lack of interest in the funding
The UK forensics providers in England
and Wales are all small to medium
size enterprises (SMEs) and therefore
will qualify for a contribution toward
the cost of collaborative research We
would be remiss not to engage with this
funding mechanism given adequate
safeguards that acknowledge our
commercial position To ensure forensics
is successful in attracting support
from Europe the forensic community
must educate the various committees
that determine which specific areas of
application are to be entertained during
any given funding round The value of
forensics and its contribution to a safer
society is blatant to all who work in the
field We anticipate that a less emotive
approach to lobbying for greater
support in future will be required if we
are to ensure that forensics is properly
recognised by the committee lsquoOpinion
Membersrsquo individuals who identify the
precise areas of endeavour that will be
supported during any given funding
round
Of course the various forensic suppliers
serving the UK CJS will also continue to
invest directly in RampD to differentiate
their services from alternative suppliers
Within LGC for instance this includes
investing in expensive and demanding
research such as our particular
approach to rapid DNA analysis beyond
the confines of the laboratory millions
of pounds and many years of work by
an interdisciplinary team of scientists
engineers and technicians It will also
include the somewhat less glamorous
assessment of background levels of grey
cotton fibres in public areas a plotline
unlikely to feature on CSI but necessary
if we are to speak with authority about
the significance of identifying this fibre
type in the course of an investigation
Forensic science delivery and continuing
RampD is populated by the same type of
person (and often the same individuals)
that has always provided the service
dedicated impartial and keen as
mustard to see the service continue to
develop to better serve the CJS in the
future Although the financial strictures
under which we operate are real and
biting we are still routinely delivering
excellence and I believe we are still
capable of surprising you in the future
with what we have yet to invent
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
06 the barrister
Lawyer is coming to the UK
Thatrsquos just the tip of a solicitor-
driven thriving writhing
entrepreneurial culture of
invention and innovation
Solicitorsrsquo firms have invested immense
intellectual capital and hard cash into a
whole spectrum of new business ideas
The cynics and doubters say that theyrsquoll
all fail and itrsquos a flash in the pan
Certainly some wonrsquot make it but there
will be others to take their place More
will evolve and their nimble-minded
and sure-footed managers and investors
will see that they do Yet others will just
continue to build on and develop a great
idea and wersquoll soon wonder why we
never thought of it before
Meanwhile strategic alliances often
falling short of merger or takeover are
being fashioned between solicitorsrsquo firms
who see the synergy in collaboration
for individual contracts or in longer
term ventures Mergers of course are
still a major part of the fast-changing
landscape solicitors inhabit and a recent
survey by Andrew Otterburn of the Law
Consultancy Network showed that the
rate of mergers had doubled in 2011
and was set to follow that trend in 2012
Venture capital is looking for such
vehicles and the bigger law firms are
and will be investing in their noisy
smaller neighbours
What then of the Bar
While there are many things like
ownership amp management structure
and a slow-moving tradition which
might inhibit such rapid iconoclastic
business development at the Bar there is
certainly no lack of intellect intelligence
and resourcefulness Progress though
is slow and it might be time for the Bar
to shake off its torpor and join the race
before itrsquos left too far behind
Despite wise words of encouragement
from the Bar Councilrsquos Chairman in
2010 Nichols Green QC that barristersrsquo
chambers needed to be at least 70-strong
few mergers have taken place and the
average membership is still just below
40 The Bar seems to be unable to grasp
the benefits of merger and the strength
amp depth of a well-diversified team the
economies of scale and the obvious clout
the very big chambers now have and
are wielding Not only that but the Bar
seem to find insurmountable practical
difficulties in following promising starts
through and there are many tales about
mergers being abandoned in the early
stages It might well be time for the
Bar to consider alliances more from a
business standpoint than a view of the
personalities involved
There are some encouraging signs
though Recently Exchange Chambers
in Liverpool and Litigation Funding
(principally made up of barristers from
Ely Chambers in London) launched their
own privately-funded litigation services
Wersquove also had Riverview Law and
Artesian Law setting up Riverview look
like the out-sourced advocacy arm of
DLA Piper and has attracted a galaxy of
stars from existing chambers who work
for them whilst remaining in their own
chambers
Artesian Law are an interesting
proposition A small number of
forward-looking barristers broke away
from their original chambers and
have set up a partnership to explore
novel ways of working with clients in
crime Six barristers a solicitor and
an experienced practice manager have
created a platform from which they
offer a range of legal services in a
flexible and modern way Seeing the
opportunities that the LSA offers and
choosing to be regulated by the SRA
rather than the BSB who are yet fully
to consult on entity regulation this
represents another way to the market
Their model appears to be similar
to that which the Bar Consultancy
Network have developed and both
anticipate novel commercial fee-sharing
arrangements between barristers and
solicitors which avoid any possible
referral fee and conflict problems by
careful organisation amp management and
choice of regulator The Bar Consultancy
Network is working with small number
of chambers who are preparing for
the challenges and opportunities that
competitive tendering in legal aid
contracts will bring
The new world though is not without
its own problems The current
structure and financial management of
traditional chambers doesnrsquot allow for
the retention of profit or the ability
to build up enough working capital to
fund major expansions and business
initiatives Investment capital may be
even harder for the Bar to access as the
requirements of private equity providers
is liable to test the membership of most
chambers
The LSA has paved the way for an
ABS world and a surprising number are
being formed Solicitors have responded
with alacrity and new thinking Many
new law firms have sprung up and
are bringing a refreshing vigour to the
market The Bar has shown some signs
of joining in though for them speeding
to catch up must be top of the agenda
Ian Dodd Bar Consultancy Network
wwwbarconsultancynetworkcouk
p1
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
04 the barrister
possible Sensibly we also apply existing
technologies to novel applications On
an ongoing basis we incrementally
improve those things that are already
lsquogoodrsquo to be ever lsquobetterrsquo
There is so much still to do and many of
the inventions and developments yet to
come we almost certainly do not know
we actually need Science in general is
littered with technologies that are now
thought essential but which a priori
no-one ever knew we needed But how
can we continue to develop the service
we offer under increasing financial
pressures
The demise of the FSS undeniably
reduced the total UK investment in
forensic RampD The FSS in later days
spent upwards of pound6 million per
annum on RampD money that in the age
of austerity has not immediately been
reallocated to forensic RampD through
other mechanisms But there is growing
recognition that the commercial supply
model embraced by England and
Wales for ongoing forensic provision
cannot mean the suppliers bear the
undiluted burden of RampD expense if
that RampD is to be of substance Those
new mechanisms include a necessarily
closer working relationship between
the commercial suppliers of forensic
laboratory consumables such as DNA
testing kits the case-working forensic
laboratories and the (numerous)
academic institutions engaged in RampD
that could find application in forensic
use
Fundamental research in our universities
needs to be supported by access to
funding mechanisms that recognise
and value forensics as an end-point for
the research conducted To that end
the Research Councils UK (RCUK) and
the Forensic Science Society have been
working closely to facilitate a funding
stream for ongoing forensic research
and development ASpecial Interest
Group in Forensic Science is currently
being planned by the Technology
Strategy Board (TSB) drawing on the
various Research Councils in the UK
This is tangible progress
Within Europe there are 7 year
cycle funding streams available for
collaborative research that prima facie
appear generous Framework Program
7 is the best known ISEC being another
that has focused on forensics in the past
These funding streams are however
not directly accessible to commercial
enterprises working in isolation and so
collaborations with academia or other
governmental forensic labs are essential
Proposed research must also have a
demonstrable impact on the ability to
better serve the criminal justice system
across Europe as borders increasingly
have little impact on the movement of
individuals within the Community
Right now funding that could be
accessed for forensics via Brussels is
considerably under-spent This reflects
the fact that research projects are very
strictly evaluated from both scientific
and accounting standpoints rather than
a lack of interest in the funding
The UK forensics providers in England
and Wales are all small to medium
size enterprises (SMEs) and therefore
will qualify for a contribution toward
the cost of collaborative research We
would be remiss not to engage with this
funding mechanism given adequate
safeguards that acknowledge our
commercial position To ensure forensics
is successful in attracting support
from Europe the forensic community
must educate the various committees
that determine which specific areas of
application are to be entertained during
any given funding round The value of
forensics and its contribution to a safer
society is blatant to all who work in the
field We anticipate that a less emotive
approach to lobbying for greater
support in future will be required if we
are to ensure that forensics is properly
recognised by the committee lsquoOpinion
Membersrsquo individuals who identify the
precise areas of endeavour that will be
supported during any given funding
round
Of course the various forensic suppliers
serving the UK CJS will also continue to
invest directly in RampD to differentiate
their services from alternative suppliers
Within LGC for instance this includes
investing in expensive and demanding
research such as our particular
approach to rapid DNA analysis beyond
the confines of the laboratory millions
of pounds and many years of work by
an interdisciplinary team of scientists
engineers and technicians It will also
include the somewhat less glamorous
assessment of background levels of grey
cotton fibres in public areas a plotline
unlikely to feature on CSI but necessary
if we are to speak with authority about
the significance of identifying this fibre
type in the course of an investigation
Forensic science delivery and continuing
RampD is populated by the same type of
person (and often the same individuals)
that has always provided the service
dedicated impartial and keen as
mustard to see the service continue to
develop to better serve the CJS in the
future Although the financial strictures
under which we operate are real and
biting we are still routinely delivering
excellence and I believe we are still
capable of surprising you in the future
with what we have yet to invent
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
06 the barrister
Lawyer is coming to the UK
Thatrsquos just the tip of a solicitor-
driven thriving writhing
entrepreneurial culture of
invention and innovation
Solicitorsrsquo firms have invested immense
intellectual capital and hard cash into a
whole spectrum of new business ideas
The cynics and doubters say that theyrsquoll
all fail and itrsquos a flash in the pan
Certainly some wonrsquot make it but there
will be others to take their place More
will evolve and their nimble-minded
and sure-footed managers and investors
will see that they do Yet others will just
continue to build on and develop a great
idea and wersquoll soon wonder why we
never thought of it before
Meanwhile strategic alliances often
falling short of merger or takeover are
being fashioned between solicitorsrsquo firms
who see the synergy in collaboration
for individual contracts or in longer
term ventures Mergers of course are
still a major part of the fast-changing
landscape solicitors inhabit and a recent
survey by Andrew Otterburn of the Law
Consultancy Network showed that the
rate of mergers had doubled in 2011
and was set to follow that trend in 2012
Venture capital is looking for such
vehicles and the bigger law firms are
and will be investing in their noisy
smaller neighbours
What then of the Bar
While there are many things like
ownership amp management structure
and a slow-moving tradition which
might inhibit such rapid iconoclastic
business development at the Bar there is
certainly no lack of intellect intelligence
and resourcefulness Progress though
is slow and it might be time for the Bar
to shake off its torpor and join the race
before itrsquos left too far behind
Despite wise words of encouragement
from the Bar Councilrsquos Chairman in
2010 Nichols Green QC that barristersrsquo
chambers needed to be at least 70-strong
few mergers have taken place and the
average membership is still just below
40 The Bar seems to be unable to grasp
the benefits of merger and the strength
amp depth of a well-diversified team the
economies of scale and the obvious clout
the very big chambers now have and
are wielding Not only that but the Bar
seem to find insurmountable practical
difficulties in following promising starts
through and there are many tales about
mergers being abandoned in the early
stages It might well be time for the
Bar to consider alliances more from a
business standpoint than a view of the
personalities involved
There are some encouraging signs
though Recently Exchange Chambers
in Liverpool and Litigation Funding
(principally made up of barristers from
Ely Chambers in London) launched their
own privately-funded litigation services
Wersquove also had Riverview Law and
Artesian Law setting up Riverview look
like the out-sourced advocacy arm of
DLA Piper and has attracted a galaxy of
stars from existing chambers who work
for them whilst remaining in their own
chambers
Artesian Law are an interesting
proposition A small number of
forward-looking barristers broke away
from their original chambers and
have set up a partnership to explore
novel ways of working with clients in
crime Six barristers a solicitor and
an experienced practice manager have
created a platform from which they
offer a range of legal services in a
flexible and modern way Seeing the
opportunities that the LSA offers and
choosing to be regulated by the SRA
rather than the BSB who are yet fully
to consult on entity regulation this
represents another way to the market
Their model appears to be similar
to that which the Bar Consultancy
Network have developed and both
anticipate novel commercial fee-sharing
arrangements between barristers and
solicitors which avoid any possible
referral fee and conflict problems by
careful organisation amp management and
choice of regulator The Bar Consultancy
Network is working with small number
of chambers who are preparing for
the challenges and opportunities that
competitive tendering in legal aid
contracts will bring
The new world though is not without
its own problems The current
structure and financial management of
traditional chambers doesnrsquot allow for
the retention of profit or the ability
to build up enough working capital to
fund major expansions and business
initiatives Investment capital may be
even harder for the Bar to access as the
requirements of private equity providers
is liable to test the membership of most
chambers
The LSA has paved the way for an
ABS world and a surprising number are
being formed Solicitors have responded
with alacrity and new thinking Many
new law firms have sprung up and
are bringing a refreshing vigour to the
market The Bar has shown some signs
of joining in though for them speeding
to catch up must be top of the agenda
Ian Dodd Bar Consultancy Network
wwwbarconsultancynetworkcouk
p1
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
Reports close to perfection ndash all the arguments judgments and citations
iclronlinecouk
Tim Dutton QC (Head of Chambers Fountain Court)
06 the barrister
Lawyer is coming to the UK
Thatrsquos just the tip of a solicitor-
driven thriving writhing
entrepreneurial culture of
invention and innovation
Solicitorsrsquo firms have invested immense
intellectual capital and hard cash into a
whole spectrum of new business ideas
The cynics and doubters say that theyrsquoll
all fail and itrsquos a flash in the pan
Certainly some wonrsquot make it but there
will be others to take their place More
will evolve and their nimble-minded
and sure-footed managers and investors
will see that they do Yet others will just
continue to build on and develop a great
idea and wersquoll soon wonder why we
never thought of it before
Meanwhile strategic alliances often
falling short of merger or takeover are
being fashioned between solicitorsrsquo firms
who see the synergy in collaboration
for individual contracts or in longer
term ventures Mergers of course are
still a major part of the fast-changing
landscape solicitors inhabit and a recent
survey by Andrew Otterburn of the Law
Consultancy Network showed that the
rate of mergers had doubled in 2011
and was set to follow that trend in 2012
Venture capital is looking for such
vehicles and the bigger law firms are
and will be investing in their noisy
smaller neighbours
What then of the Bar
While there are many things like
ownership amp management structure
and a slow-moving tradition which
might inhibit such rapid iconoclastic
business development at the Bar there is
certainly no lack of intellect intelligence
and resourcefulness Progress though
is slow and it might be time for the Bar
to shake off its torpor and join the race
before itrsquos left too far behind
Despite wise words of encouragement
from the Bar Councilrsquos Chairman in
2010 Nichols Green QC that barristersrsquo
chambers needed to be at least 70-strong
few mergers have taken place and the
average membership is still just below
40 The Bar seems to be unable to grasp
the benefits of merger and the strength
amp depth of a well-diversified team the
economies of scale and the obvious clout
the very big chambers now have and
are wielding Not only that but the Bar
seem to find insurmountable practical
difficulties in following promising starts
through and there are many tales about
mergers being abandoned in the early
stages It might well be time for the
Bar to consider alliances more from a
business standpoint than a view of the
personalities involved
There are some encouraging signs
though Recently Exchange Chambers
in Liverpool and Litigation Funding
(principally made up of barristers from
Ely Chambers in London) launched their
own privately-funded litigation services
Wersquove also had Riverview Law and
Artesian Law setting up Riverview look
like the out-sourced advocacy arm of
DLA Piper and has attracted a galaxy of
stars from existing chambers who work
for them whilst remaining in their own
chambers
Artesian Law are an interesting
proposition A small number of
forward-looking barristers broke away
from their original chambers and
have set up a partnership to explore
novel ways of working with clients in
crime Six barristers a solicitor and
an experienced practice manager have
created a platform from which they
offer a range of legal services in a
flexible and modern way Seeing the
opportunities that the LSA offers and
choosing to be regulated by the SRA
rather than the BSB who are yet fully
to consult on entity regulation this
represents another way to the market
Their model appears to be similar
to that which the Bar Consultancy
Network have developed and both
anticipate novel commercial fee-sharing
arrangements between barristers and
solicitors which avoid any possible
referral fee and conflict problems by
careful organisation amp management and
choice of regulator The Bar Consultancy
Network is working with small number
of chambers who are preparing for
the challenges and opportunities that
competitive tendering in legal aid
contracts will bring
The new world though is not without
its own problems The current
structure and financial management of
traditional chambers doesnrsquot allow for
the retention of profit or the ability
to build up enough working capital to
fund major expansions and business
initiatives Investment capital may be
even harder for the Bar to access as the
requirements of private equity providers
is liable to test the membership of most
chambers
The LSA has paved the way for an
ABS world and a surprising number are
being formed Solicitors have responded
with alacrity and new thinking Many
new law firms have sprung up and
are bringing a refreshing vigour to the
market The Bar has shown some signs
of joining in though for them speeding
to catch up must be top of the agenda
Ian Dodd Bar Consultancy Network
wwwbarconsultancynetworkcouk
p1
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
06 the barrister
Lawyer is coming to the UK
Thatrsquos just the tip of a solicitor-
driven thriving writhing
entrepreneurial culture of
invention and innovation
Solicitorsrsquo firms have invested immense
intellectual capital and hard cash into a
whole spectrum of new business ideas
The cynics and doubters say that theyrsquoll
all fail and itrsquos a flash in the pan
Certainly some wonrsquot make it but there
will be others to take their place More
will evolve and their nimble-minded
and sure-footed managers and investors
will see that they do Yet others will just
continue to build on and develop a great
idea and wersquoll soon wonder why we
never thought of it before
Meanwhile strategic alliances often
falling short of merger or takeover are
being fashioned between solicitorsrsquo firms
who see the synergy in collaboration
for individual contracts or in longer
term ventures Mergers of course are
still a major part of the fast-changing
landscape solicitors inhabit and a recent
survey by Andrew Otterburn of the Law
Consultancy Network showed that the
rate of mergers had doubled in 2011
and was set to follow that trend in 2012
Venture capital is looking for such
vehicles and the bigger law firms are
and will be investing in their noisy
smaller neighbours
What then of the Bar
While there are many things like
ownership amp management structure
and a slow-moving tradition which
might inhibit such rapid iconoclastic
business development at the Bar there is
certainly no lack of intellect intelligence
and resourcefulness Progress though
is slow and it might be time for the Bar
to shake off its torpor and join the race
before itrsquos left too far behind
Despite wise words of encouragement
from the Bar Councilrsquos Chairman in
2010 Nichols Green QC that barristersrsquo
chambers needed to be at least 70-strong
few mergers have taken place and the
average membership is still just below
40 The Bar seems to be unable to grasp
the benefits of merger and the strength
amp depth of a well-diversified team the
economies of scale and the obvious clout
the very big chambers now have and
are wielding Not only that but the Bar
seem to find insurmountable practical
difficulties in following promising starts
through and there are many tales about
mergers being abandoned in the early
stages It might well be time for the
Bar to consider alliances more from a
business standpoint than a view of the
personalities involved
There are some encouraging signs
though Recently Exchange Chambers
in Liverpool and Litigation Funding
(principally made up of barristers from
Ely Chambers in London) launched their
own privately-funded litigation services
Wersquove also had Riverview Law and
Artesian Law setting up Riverview look
like the out-sourced advocacy arm of
DLA Piper and has attracted a galaxy of
stars from existing chambers who work
for them whilst remaining in their own
chambers
Artesian Law are an interesting
proposition A small number of
forward-looking barristers broke away
from their original chambers and
have set up a partnership to explore
novel ways of working with clients in
crime Six barristers a solicitor and
an experienced practice manager have
created a platform from which they
offer a range of legal services in a
flexible and modern way Seeing the
opportunities that the LSA offers and
choosing to be regulated by the SRA
rather than the BSB who are yet fully
to consult on entity regulation this
represents another way to the market
Their model appears to be similar
to that which the Bar Consultancy
Network have developed and both
anticipate novel commercial fee-sharing
arrangements between barristers and
solicitors which avoid any possible
referral fee and conflict problems by
careful organisation amp management and
choice of regulator The Bar Consultancy
Network is working with small number
of chambers who are preparing for
the challenges and opportunities that
competitive tendering in legal aid
contracts will bring
The new world though is not without
its own problems The current
structure and financial management of
traditional chambers doesnrsquot allow for
the retention of profit or the ability
to build up enough working capital to
fund major expansions and business
initiatives Investment capital may be
even harder for the Bar to access as the
requirements of private equity providers
is liable to test the membership of most
chambers
The LSA has paved the way for an
ABS world and a surprising number are
being formed Solicitors have responded
with alacrity and new thinking Many
new law firms have sprung up and
are bringing a refreshing vigour to the
market The Bar has shown some signs
of joining in though for them speeding
to catch up must be top of the agenda
Ian Dodd Bar Consultancy Network
wwwbarconsultancynetworkcouk
p1
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
SRXEGXYWRS[XSWII[L][IacuteVIFIGSQMRKQSVIERHQSVILIPTJYPXSWSPMGMXSVWEPPSZIVXLI2SVXLIWXERHFI]SRH
8IP`[[[R[QIHMEXMSRWSPYXMSRWGSYO
+-)=3960-)287731)8-2+(-)6)28
2368)781)(-8-3273098-327
6)13)0-)28786)77)2396+)(amp=39687
2339683787
))4(-7498)746-8)
0)777)46)468-32360-)287
3-(0-8-+8-326-7
6)(9))lt4)27)
0-1-8)((-73)6=
Reforming Magistrates By Stephen Moffatt Policy and Campaigns Officer Criminal Justice Alliance
The criminal justice
system is going through
a period of significant
and sustained reform
The financial crisis
has shone a light on
longstanding inefficiencies in the system
in particular the huge sums of money
required to keep an ever-increasing
numbers of prisoners incarcerated
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has
questioned the effectiveness of a range
of criminal justice services instigating a
debate on whether they offer good value
for money in terms of crime reduction
fairness and public confidence
The result of this is substantial policy
and legislative change not without
controversy and internal power
struggles The all encompassing
lsquorehabilitation revolutionrsquo has been
the driver towards a more localist and
outcome-based agenda - the introduction
of payment by results schemes
increasing privatization of prisons
police and probation and creation of the
soon to be democratically-elected police
and crime commissioners all features of
the emerging landscape
The cost of maintaining the prison
estate has risen over the last decade to
over pound4 billion with the annual cost of
reoffending estimated to be above pound11
billion The government is attempting
to reduce this enormous bill enacting a
23 cut in the Ministry of Justice budget
over the course of this parliament for
example pushing through reductions
in legal aid commitments within the
Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment
of Offenders Bill despite significant
opposition If a policy promises to cut
costs whilst not appearing unduly lenient
to the public there is a strong likelihood
that it will be enacted It is to one such
potential change that I wish to draw
particular attention to magistrates and
the limits of their sentencing jurisdiction
Presently magistrates can exercise
their summary jurisdiction over cases
in which offenders could receive a
07the barrister
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
08 the barrister
maximum 6 month custodial sentence
extending to two years for offenders
sentenced within a juvenile court They
deal exclusively with minor offences
usually acquisitive in nature or low end
drug offences handing down short term
prison sentences community orders or
fines The numbers of cases magistrates
deal with have been gradually declining
7 last year as have the numbers
of magistrates down to 27500 from
37000 and predicted to settle at around
22-24000 in the future1
The Magistratesrsquo Association is keen to
have the jurisdiction of the magistracy
extended They wish to be able to pass
down custodial sentences of up to 12
months and there have been numerous
signs that the government is seriously
considering this option
At present section 154 of Criminal
Justice Act 2003 enacted by the last
Labour Government allows magistrates
to pass down a sentence of up to 12
months however this part of the act has
never been implemented Ken Clarke
wished to repeal this section under the
LASPO bill perhaps concerned that
magistratesrsquo courts would too quickly
fill his prison cells However in reaction
to the riots and what appeared to the
public to be swift and sure justice
dispensed by the magistrates he failed to
get the requisite approval from his party
and had to back down The powers thus
remain on the statute book and could be
revisited without future parliamentary
debate
Magistrates have a long and important
history with the criminal justice system
and despite some fears a few years
ago it is generally accepted that this
should long continue There is unlocked
potential within magistrates in terms
of their ability to improve the outcomes
of those coming into contact with the
criminal justice system due to the way
they currently exercise their authority
However it is questionable whether
extending their sentencing jurisdiction
above six months would be the best way
to unleash said potential and whether
or not they are in a position to do so
anyway in terms of resources and
general support
It is claimed that the government will
make large financial savings by granting
magistrates 12 month sentencing
powers and that the criminal justice
process will be rapidly sped up for many
offences Attorney General Dominic
Grieve suggested that increasing the
sentencing powers of magistrates would
make the court system more efficient as
early guilty pleas in magistratesrsquo courts
cost the justice system on average pound90 a
case compared with pound750 when similar
hearings are referred to the Crown
Court2 The Magistratesrsquo Association
believe that on average each case in a
magistratesrsquo court costs pound900 compared
to pound3500 in a Crown Court3 However
some statistics suggest that the differing
expense between magistrates and
district court judges is extremely minor
unless you take into consideration the
latterrsquos greater propensity to sentence to
custody4
Yet the debatable cost savings are
dwarfed by the potential increase
in custodial costs It is argued that
magistrates have proven themselves to
be responsible enough not to expand
the prison population once given an
extended sentencing power as the
custodial rate of children has been
on a consistent decrease over the last
three years (from around 3000 in 2008
to 2000 in 2011) However despite
magistratesrsquo decisions having some
influence on this decrease research
suggests that the real reasons for the
declining numbers are many complex
and in truth predominantly inadvertent
repercussions of policy decisions and
procedures and certainly canrsquot be put
down to the work of a single agency5
Evidence of increasingly punitive
sentencing in other areas is exemplified
by a fivefold increase between 1992
and 2002 in the number of women
sentenced to custody by the magistratesrsquo
courts6 During this time the general
custodial rate here jumped from 5
to 16 (admittedly a large proportion
of this is down to district court judges
sitting in magistratesrsquo courts) whilst
within the crown court the rate went
from 45 to 637 Although it cannot
be conclusively shown that the increased
sentencing power would substantially
enlarge prison numbers there would
appear to be a significant risk that it
would do so especially if district court
judgesrsquo summary powers were increased
simultaneously
Increasing sentencing powers could
impact on other important principles
in justice for example putting at risk
the fundamental right to a trial by jury
(something which the government
seems willing to quietly curtail) Instead
as the justice system is refocusing and
questioning priorities so too should
the magistracy Now is the opportune
moment to explore the full potential of
their existing sentencing powers and
their unique contribution
England and Wales are one of the few
jurisdictions left in the world (aside
from a handful of small island nations)
that has retained the magistracy It is
important to determine why it continues
to do so in the 21st century for it
will assist determining the direction
the magistracy should pursue The
Magistratesrsquo Association themselves are
in the process of drafting a report based
on research they carried out on the role
of the magistracy in the 21st century
As volunteers freely giving of their
time there is a connection to local
communities that cannot be found
within the judiciary The magistracy
could do more to fully exploit and take
advantage of this Local magistrates
may not always be reflective of entire
communities (an issue the magistrates
are trying to address) but the underlying
rationale of lay members of the public
judging their peers nonetheless remains
highly valuable This is not to suggest that
their sentencing should be determined
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
by their localities generating greater
inconsistency between neighbourhoods
but for example the opportunity to sit
in more informal community locations
could be explored
For instance magistrates could do more
to educate communities about their role
and the work of the criminal justice
system more generally The Magistrates
Association is keen to continue to
expand on schemes that do this
especially amongst young people and
ethnic minority groups in urban areas
More substantially magistrates could
spend a greater amount of time looking
at the welfare and vulnerabilities of
the offenders appearing before them
how such was linked to the criminal
behavior in question and the effect that
any sentence is likely to have on them
Magistrates are in excellent positions to
determine the performance of several
statutory agencies towards individuals
who subsequently go on to commit
crimes In this manner they have the
potential to highlight the fact that the
criminal justice system is frequently
being used to rectify what is in essence a
social issue with prisons too often used
to warehouse individuals that other
agencies refuse to cope with
I would not go as far to say that all
magistratesrsquo courts should suddenly
strive to imitate problem solving courts
- more research and evidence is first
needed but the adoption of a similar
mind frame surrounding the multiple
issues in an offendersrsquo life when
sentencing would be beneficial
Similarly more attention could be given
to the welfare and vulnerabilities of the
families of offenders Such an approach
could help particular community welfare
problems being addressed before they
are escalated through the justice system
and seen purely as criminal issues The
imprisonment last year of 25 parents for
failing to ensure their childrsquos attendance
at school is a clear example of this
misguided approach Better allocation
of the roles of criminal justice and social
institutions in this way could ultimately
lower offending and re-offending
These benefits should supersede the
view that magistrates should only apply
the strict letter of the law They are in
a prime position to do more than that
and such an approach is more worthy of
investigation than an extension of their
punitive sentencing powers Placing a
degree of responsibility on the shoulders
of magistrates for the sentences they
hand down in this way should be seen
as positive without being too unrealistic
or inappropriate
The government could start by placing
the relationship magistrates have
with probation on a statutory footing
Presently there is no obligation on
probation to show magistrates the
services that carry out community
orders Altering this should be seen as
a priority as it will improve confidence
in and understanding of community
programmes demonstrate how
vulnerabilities are being met and
offending behavior being dealt with
which should in turn improve judicial
and public confidence in such orders
The Chairman of the Magistratesrsquo
Association said that this approach will
encourage members to use alternatives
to custody more often
Nick Herbert said in a speech given
to the Magistratesrsquo Association late
last year that he wants to ldquoreclaim
summary justice for the community
with magistrates at the centrerdquo8 What
possible better way of starting this
than having magistrates take greater
consideration of local problems
individual vulnerabilities and the lasting
effects of the sentences they hand down
This may sound unduly onerous but
with additional support and resources
there is the potential to carry out this
work Of course during these economic
times when magistratesrsquo courts are
being closed and expenses have been
frozen the likelihood of receiving such
is minimal but if Nick Herbert is to
commit to his words this is surely the
best method of doing so
Magistrates have unlocked potential
However we cannot lay unreasonable
expectations at the court door They
will not significantly reduce reoffending
rates nor improve relations between the
criminal justice system and the public
overnight They canrsquot lift individuals
out of poverty They canrsquot improve the
education system They cannot address
employment issues What they can
do is assist in the process of doing so
by adapting practice and helping to
promote desistance through effective
and supportive sentencing providing
people who are presented before them
the opportunity to address underlying
criminal behavioural issues Simply
granting increased sentencing powers
to magistrates misses a key opportunity
to fundamentally rethink the important
role of the magistracy
1 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
2 httpwwwguardiancouklaw2011
sep07attorney-general-ken-clarke-
magistrates
3 Speech by John Fassenfelt to Criminal
Justice Alliance 25th January 2012
4 Morgan R and Russell N (2002) The
Role of the Judiciary in the Magistratesrsquo
Courts Home Office Report
5 Allen R (2011) Last Resort
Prison Reform Trust httpwww
prisonreformtrustorgukPortals0
Documentslastresortpdf
6 Hedderman C (2012) Empty Cells or
Empty Words Criminal Justice Alliance
7 Hough M Jacobson J and Millie
A (2003) The Decision to Imprison
Sentencing and the Prison Population
Prison Reform Trust
8 httpwwwnickherbertcom
media_centrephp501Reclaiming20
Summary20Justice
09the barrister
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
10 the barrister
including my former employer Saltley and Nechells Law Centre in Birmingham
The Law Centre Movement is indeed currently facing the greatest threat to its existence in its 42 year history The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) envisages a radical overhaul in entitlement to civil legal aid in several areas of law including housing employment debt and welfare benefits which have a crucial bearing on the work of Law Centres As I shall argue in this article the LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres
The Financial Difficulties Experienced by Law Centres under the Current Legal Aid Scheme - A Case StudyAt present there are 54 Law Centres across England Wales and Northern Ireland In order to obtain legal aid funding they must tender for legal aid contracts in competition with private law firms If successful in obtaining a contract the Law Centre in question receives payments from the Legal Services Commission on a case by case basis
Figures released by the Law Centres Federation show that one in three Law Centres relies on legal aid contracts to provide at least 60 per cent of their annual funding A number of Law Centres receive annual local authority grants in addition to legal aid funding but such arrangements are becoming increasingly rare and in any event the grants are generally quite modest in value
At Saltley and Nechells Law Centre (hereafter SNLC) I was acutely aware of the financial pressure the current legal aid scheme places on the not-for-profit sector
The overheads involved in running even a modest Law Centre are high These include the rent of premises the salaries of solicitors fee earners and administrative staff fuel bills telephone bills stationery postage professional indemnity insurance premiums
photocopier hire fees and subscriptions to practitionersrsquo texts
In respect of each welfare rights case SNLC received a standard fixed fee of pound16700 excluding VAT The fixed fee was the equivalent of three hoursrsquo work on the case at an hourly rate of pound5560 SNLC was paid on closure of the case notwithstanding the fact that many cases particularly those appealed to the Upper Tribunal or the Tax Adjudicator take several months or even years to close
SNLC received no additional remuneration if it spent more than three hours on a case except where it spent over nine hours on it Under these circumstances it received remuneration for the actual amount of time spent on the case at the rate of pound5560 per hour
The difficulties with this system are threefold
(1) Firstly it creates an incentive for organisations to cherry-pick those cases which can be closed with the minimum amount of time and effort SNLC refused to select cases in this way and as a result found it difficult to make publicly funded work financially viable However the cherry-picking of cases undermines the concept of access to justice ndash the very raison drsquoetre of a legal aid scheme
(2) Secondly the system creates an anomalous situation where a case that falls just short of the three times limit is only paid at a fraction of its true value Under these circumstances legal aid practitioners might be tempted to generate unnecessary costs purely to tip the case into the ldquoexceptional categoryrdquo thereby generating a fee which properly reflects the actual level of time and effort invested
(3) Thirdly and most fundamentally the overwhelming majority of cases fall between these two extremes These cases result in a net loss to the organisation since the value of the work conducted on the case exceeds the standard fixed fee payable From a
purely financial perspective these are the least desirable cases to open
The upshot was that the level of remuneration available for legal aid work was simply insufficient to meet SNLCrsquos overheads The poor rate of remuneration created severe cash flow problems eventually forcing the Law Centre into administration on 13 October 2010
The Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO)
The latest figures indicate that the UK has amassed a national debt totalling pound1004 trillion representing 642 per cent of Gross Domestic Product It is estimated that the legal aid cuts in the LASPO Bill will achieve cost savings of pound350 million
In my view this projected cost saving represents a false economy At the time of writing the Bill proposes to abolish entitlement to legal aid altogether in respect of employment law welfare benefits and debt Housing law will face a 40 per cent reduction in scope The proposals will therefore remove the bulk of legal aid funding from Law Centresrsquo main practice areas leaving them without the financial means to continue their work Furthermore the Law Centres that currently receive local authority funding will face a 53 per cent cut in their annual funding over the coming year
The cumulative effect of cuts in legal aid and local authority funding will be to starve Law Centres of funds and force them to close In my view this will lead to the end of the Law Centre movement
The Impact of the Closure of Law Centres on Local Communities
If this happens the effect on Law Centresrsquo vulnerable clientele will be catastrophic As I see it the closure of SNLC impeded access to justice in the local community in the following way
applications for possession orders
p1
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
11the barrister
which may well lead to an increase in evictions and homelessness in the area According to a report by the New Economics Foundation (The Socio-Economic Benefit of Law Centres 2008) each local authority eviction will cost the taxpayer pound34085 compared to the pound174 cost of 95 hours of legal advice
dismissed by their employers are less likely to seek legal advice with the result that valid claims are less likely to be identified and brought within the limitation period
decisions are less likely to be appealed leading to lower household incomes increased child poverty and increased social exclusion Figures published by the Ministry of Justice on 1 December 2011 reveal that 40 per cent of First-Tier Tribunals (Social Entitlement Chamber) find in favour of those who appeal against decisions not to award them incapacity benefit
now less likely to seek advice resulting in an increase in bankruptcy and mental illness in the area It is likely that this scenario will be repeated across the country
Conclusion
The LASPO Bill was subject to a record 11 Government vote defeats in the House of Lords ndash the highest number of defeats in the last 30 years It is clear to see why In my view no one will benefit from the LASPO Bill
achieve cost savings of pound350 million as it intends Independent research conducted by the New Economics Foundation indicates that every pound1 invested in a Law Centre yields pound10 worth of cost savings and social benefits for local government If the proposed reforms are enacted these cost savings and benefits will be lost
will severely inhibit access to justice at a time when demand for legal aid has never been greater
sector of the legal profession to contract and will result in job losses with many talented advocates leaving the profession
The LASPO Bill will spell the end of neighbourhood Law Centres and leave thousands of vulnerable clients without legal redress Furthermore the destruction of the Law Centre movement will have been in vain since it is highly unlikely that the Bill will achieve its projected cost savings of pound350 million in view of all the empirical evidence available
It would therefore seem that LASPO is a Bill none of us can afford
Emily Johnson LLB (Hons)Barrister-at-law (non-practising)Emilyjohnson1596aolcom
Benefit up to 66 of taxable incomeUp to pound1200 tax free benefit per weekBenefit payable from day one or a choice of deferred periodsNo premium loadings for occupationAll our members get a tax free lump sum at retirementAn option to increase your lump sumNo penalty for frequent claims or limit on the amount of claims
Call 0121 452 1066 or email infodgmutualcouk to arrange your cover today wwwdgmutualcouk
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority under current UK legislation
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
12 the barrister
IT Sets The Bar By Nick Hartwell Senior Project Manager for LEX Chambers Management at Bar Squared Ltd
Considering the current
legal landscape
and comparing it
to the landscape of
yesteryear significant
changes are apparent
Gone are the days of being able to
manage Chambers (an entity which has
been forced to morph its operational
structure to a more corporate one) using
t-cards and a paper diary Within a
profession that still enjoys a degree of
traditionalism the inevitable resistance
to change present as a result means that
knowing what steps to take to minimize
the potential risks associated with an IT
system change can be a massive hurdle
to overcome The many and varied
factors in play when it comes to the
crunch time of changing your IT the
decision is one that is often repeatedly
postponed and only finally addressed at
a time of crisis eg when a server has
failed or the realization dawns that your
current system is unable to cope with
more modern ways of working
When a server fails it is likely that
your business will be brought to its
knees You will be facing a Staff who
either struggle enormously or who are
totally unable to perform the day to day
tasks associated with their jobs Other
members of the organization will be
hampered by the effects of the staff being
rendered helpless and consequently it is
never long before you have a whole host
of massively disgruntled personalities
surrounding you all of which want
solutions immediately The position
is wholly undesirable and spells out
some very valid reasons for adopting
a pro-active stance when it comes
to Chambersrsquo IT itrsquos the core of the
business after all
So having set the scene what steps can
you take to ensure that you minimize
the risks and maximize the benefits for
your business
Polished sales techniques are simple
to achieve and can often sway your
decision one way or another It is
important to remember though that
the product or service that you are
buying should be considered over and
above the sales pitch taking references
and asking to meet with members of the
implementation service and support
teams to ensure that you are buying
precisely what you believe you are is
a sensible plan Do your utmost to
ensure that you are getting what you
think you are because the sale and
implementation is merely a fraction of
the work that is involved in the longer
term
Support and the provision of ongoing
training is important because this will
assist you in maximizing the potential
of your IT system and ultimately benefit
your business With this in mind
question whether the cost of maintenance
and support is a part of the price you
have been quoted What is the quality
of the service that you may expect to
receive from your new supplier These
are points that you must take references
in relation to from existing users Very
often companies are tempted by low
cost offerings because of the current
financial climate but sometimes as
the adage goes ldquopenny wise pound
foolishrdquo Sometimes it pays to spend a
little more than you have to so that you
might enjoy a superior level of service
Determining the requirements your
business has from its IT solution is
paramount Often people take their
existing solution for granted without
regard for what it actually does for them
and the business More often than not
systems in place within organizations
are not used to their potential and so
two key questions to ask in the first
instance is ldquoAre we making the most of
our current provisionrdquo and ldquoAre there
areas where our current provision could
be improvedrdquo
Two significant changes were recently
imposed on Barristersrsquo Chambers
that impacted the administrative
requirements Both of these changes
required programmatic changes to
be made to Chambers IT systems to
facilitate compliance with the changes
These changes specifically relating to
the BSB and client complaints procedure
and the London Boroughs Legal Alliance
forcing Chambers to stop using fee notes
and begin using invoice style billing
meant that software providers had to
react rapidly to provide Chambers with
modifications to their software in order
that they did not suffer a loss of business
efficiency
When yoursquore hunting for a supplier you
want to be sure that the end decision is
the right one and the questions listed
above should assist you in determining
amongst other things key information
about whether each supplier is credible
whether they are stable in the market
place and if they have sufficient
expertise to provide a workable solution
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
13the barrister
with longevity of service Itrsquos also vital
to take references from other similar
businesses about a potential service
provider ndash certainly in IT criticism is
forthcoming so ask an existing user
about their feeling towards a supplier
before you commit to anything This
way you have a valuable opinion from
somebody who has previously been in
your position
Consider the experience and expertise
that your chosen supplier has in respect
of deploying a similar solution You
should interrogate them as to lead times
for delivery the implementation process
that they have and also ensure that the
process is clearly documented If an
organization is installing many similar
systems they will have a process that
is tried and tested and you will benefit
from experienced implementation
analysts and a mechanical process that
ensures they deliver in accordance with
your requirements and on time
Fundamentally think that whilst a
company may have a fantastic reputation
in a particular field it may not be yours
Ensure that the company specializes
in your area of work Cadburyrsquos make
great chocolate but you wouldnrsquot buy a
sports car from them would you
So what makes one IT provider better
than another Once again a host of
factors come into play here Do your
potential suppliers understand and
appreciate the finer nuances of your
specialized business model Have
you asked your suppliers about their
current client acquisition rate Have
you considered the client retention
rate your supplier has in your field of
business Is the supplierrsquos presence in
your market a growing concern
As you doubtless realize the world of
IT is an ever changing one and in order
that your move to new suppliers bears
all the benefits that it should you need
to ensure that you are engaging with
an organization who are aware of the
requirement for regular updates ensuring
that your software and infrastructure
remain as modern as is possible You
should make certain that upgrades to
the software and infrastructure will not
cause your business disruption and that
they will be managed as efficiently as the
installation process to ensure that they
are a seamless process Cost is another
factor that bears thinking about and
inquiring about in advance too Some
companies may want to charge you
additional money for regular updates
This may be unnecessary and may also
come as a shock to your budget if it isnrsquot
planned for
Security of investment is therefore
crucial Is your
investment still
going to appear
as wise in 5
years Does
your provider
have a product
roadmap for
the future and
is their offering
c o m p a t i b l e
with the latest
i n d u s t r y
s t a n d a r d
s o f t w a r e
In essence
when you are
c o n s i d e r i n g
investment in
new technology
donrsquot only look
after today
consider the
position your
chosen provider
and their
solution will render you in in the coming
years
In essence if yoursquore thinking about
changing your IT be it infrastructure
software or even basic hardware talk to
others who have been in your position
and learn from their experiences Donrsquot
make a decision based solely on cost
Ensure that your chosen provider is
equipped to deal with change quickly
and effectively And finally choose the
system that not only caters for todayrsquos
requirements but that ensures you are
looked after in future
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
14 the barrister
Dont ignore a request to mediateHalsey applied A note on PGF II SA v OMFS Company [2012] EWHC 83 (TCC)
By Tony Allen Solicitor Mediator and Senior Consultant to CEDR
Another strong
decision has
emerged from the
Technology and
Construction Court
as a warning that
judges will not look kindly on a failure
to respond to a proposal for mediation
In PGF v OMFS [2012] EWHC 83
(TCC) Recorder Stephen Furst QC sat
as a Deputy High Court judge to hear
a dilapidations claim for just over pound1
million brought by PGF in respect of
premises in Lombard Street London
Trial was to start on 11 January 2012
but on the previous day PGF accepted a
Part 36 offer of pound700000 made by the
defendant OMFS nine months earlier
on 11 April 2011 This terminated the
substantive claim and while PGF were
entitled to costs up to the date of the Part
36 offer they sought a court order under
CPR 3610(4)(b) for OMFS to pay their
costs from April 2011 until settlement
seeking to challenge their normal
liability to pay OMFSrsquos costs after late
acceptance under CPR 3610(5)(b) PGF
argued that the ordinary expectation
that they should be liable for OMFSrsquos
costs following late acceptance should
be varied for three reasons
1 it was only on 10 January 2012
(the day before trial) that OMFS made
it clear that they were going to argue
that they were not liable for defects
in the ventilation system because that
system was actually outside the demised
premises (a point that they had not
pleaded) and about which OMFS would
need to amend at trial
2 that this was ldquoinformationrdquo
within the meaning of CPR 3614(4)
available (or not) to the parties at the
time the Part 36 was made which if
available would have materially affected
their decision as to whether to accept it
or not
3 PGF had proposed mediation
in a Part 36 offer of their own in April
2011 and again in July 2011 both of
which had been ignored by OMFS these
amounted to unreasonable refusals
giving rise to grounds for varying the
normal costs order
The judge broadly found against the
claimant PGF on the first two points
which left only the refusal of mediation
as a basis for disturbing the ordinary
costs pattern The judge applied the
tests and burden of proof established by
Halsey v Milton Keynes NHST carefully
He accepted that the burden lay on
PGF that mediation had a reasonable
prospect of success and overall to
persuade the court to vary the normally
expected costs order but he readily
found that the defendants OMFS had
behaved unreasonably by ignoring
PGFrsquos invitations to mediate and that
mediation had reasonable prospects of
success (never easy to challenge when
a case actually settled just before trial)
He also found that the claimantrsquos offer
to mediate was genuine and although
not repeatedly followed up there was
no evidence of the claimant simply
going through the motions of offering
mediation Implicitly he also accepted
the claimantrsquos assertions that the case
was well suited to mediation that
OMFS did not reasonably consider their
case so strong as to warrant refusing
mediation and that the Part 36 offers
constituted evidence of willingness to
treat with each other reasonably and
that mediation would not give rise to
undue cost or delay
The judge rejected the suggestion
that any adverse order should only be
made from the hypothetical date for
the mediation finding that the basis
for the sanction is the unreasonable
conduct which in this case coincided
with the Part 36 offers mad in April
2011 Although he declined to award
costs to PGF for the period after the
Part 36 offer had expired he awarded
PGF their costs up to the expiry of the
21 day period in May 2011 and made
no order as to costs thereafter each
party bearing their own This matches
the outcome in the earlier touchstone
case (not referred to in PGF) of Dunnett
v Railtrack
Features of the case
There are some interesting additional
features of this decision which are
worthy of comment and which bear on
the use of mediation in other sectors
Firstly the judge was prepared to infer
from OMFSrsquos silence in response to the
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
two invitations to mediate that they had
declined to mediate and he found those
to have been unreasonable
Furthermore there had been a previous
mediation between the parties in 2010
over another aspect of the service
charge The implication sought to be
raised by OMFS was that PGF had
adopted an unreasonable stance within
the confidentiality of the mediation
and that this was a legitimate factor
in deciding whether a later mediation
would have been successful The judge
declined to receive evidence of the
previous mediation because PGF declined
to waive privilege He also refused to
draw any adverse inference from PGFrsquos
refusal to waive that privilege for as he
commented
To do so would be to undermine the
very protection given to the parties in
relation to their conduct in a mediation
He also commented that by ignoring
the 2011 mediation proposal OMFS
had surprisingly missed the chance to
argue that point as an explanation for
their refusal He was unimpressed by the
mobilisation of such an argument so late
in the day when faced by a possible costs
sanction
This has the practical effect of making it
very unwise for a party to ignore a good
faith invitation to mediate If the invitee
feels that mediation is inappropriate
then they should say so in writing
setting out reasons fully in a way likely
to appeal to a judge later either in an
open letter or marked ldquowithout prejudice
save as to costsrdquo It also underlines
that unreasonableness demonstrated in
declining to mediate can give rise to a
sanction but unreasonableness alleged
to have occurred within a mediation is
not admissible later This is an important
distinction Unless parties can feel
entirely safe within the evidentially secure
environment created by a mediation
agreement they will be unlikely to move
It is only in cases where for whatever
reason (usually unwise) both parties
agree to disclose attitudes taken within
a mediation that the court can have
the right to adjudicate on such matters
The outcome for the Earl of Malmesbury
in his claim against Strutt and Parker
([2008] EWHC QB 4240 is a salutary
lesson about doing so demonstrating
that a judge is only likely to find one of
the parties to have been reasonable in
their attitude at a mediation and might
well penalise the other one
Secondly OMFS sought to escape a
sanction by arguing that the mediation
Citroen Wells - Chartered AccountantsampŝƌƐƚĐůĂƐƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƚĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƉƌŝĐĞƐdžƉĞƌƚĂĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĨŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐ
ƚŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐǁĞƌĞĂůůĂďŽƵƚƚĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽīǁĞďĞůŝĞǀĞŝŶƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂŶƵŶƌŝǀĂůůĞĚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ŽǁŚĞƚŚĞƌLJŽƵƌĞĂďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌŽƌĐŚĂŵďĞƌƐʹǁĞƌĞŚĞƌĞƚŽŚĞůƉtŚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŚĞĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůŝƐƐƵĞŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶ
ŵĂŝůƵƐƵƐŝŶŐŽƵƌĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌĂŶĚŚĂŵďĞƌƐĞͲŵĂŝůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐďĂƌƌŝƐƚĞƌƐΛĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬǀŝƐŝƚǁǁǁĐŝƚƌŽĞŶǁĞůůƐĐŽƵŬŽƌĐĂůů020 7304 2000ŝƚƌŽĞŶtĞůůƐĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞŽƵƐĞϭĞǀŽŶƐŚŝƌĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭtϱZƐŬƚŽƐƉĞĂŬƚŽĂǀŝĚZŽĚŶĞLJŽƌĂǀŝĚDĂƌŬƐZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚŽĐĂƌƌLJŽŶĂƵĚŝƚǁŽƌŬŝŶƚŚĞhltĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞhltďLJƚŚĞŶƐƟƚƵƚĞŽĨŚĂƌƚĞƌĞĚĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐŝŶŶŐůĂŶĚĂŶĚtĂůĞƐ
gtgth^EKtKE
02073042000 dĂdžWzĂŶĚsdŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚƐĂŶĚƚĂdžƌĞƚƵƌŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƟŽŶ
ŽŽŬŬĞĞƉŝŶŐsdƌĞƚƵƌŶĂŶĚƉĂLJƌŽůůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟǀĞƚĂdžĂŶĚĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĐĐŽƵŶƚĂŶƚƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůůŝƟŐĂƟŽŶ ŝŶǀĞƐƟŐĂƟŽŶƐĂƐƐĞƚƚƌĂĐŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶƐŽůǀĞŶĐLJ
15the barrister
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
would not have worked because of the
absence of expert valuation reports
when the mediation would have taken
place Again the judge said
The court should be wary of arguments
only raised in retrospect as to why a
party refused to mediate or as to why it
cannot be demonstrated that a mediation
would have had a reasonable prospect
of success First such assertions are
easy to put forward and difficult to
prove or disprove but in this case are
unsupported by evidence Secondly and
in any event it is clear that the courts
wish to encourage mediation and whilst
there may be legitimate difficulties in
mediating or successfully mediating
these can only be overcome if those
difficulties are addressed at the time
It would seem to me consistent with the
policy which encourages mediation by
depriving a successful party of its costs
in appropriate cases that it should also
deprive such a party of costs where
there are real obstacles to mediation
which might reasonably be overcome
but are not addressed because that
party does not raise them at the time
This is a gloss on Halsey which
does much to remind us that Halsey
actually decides that costs sanctions
are permissible against a successful
party who either ignores a judgersquos
recommendation or another partyrsquos
genuinely intended invitation to
mediate so long as the Halsey criteria
are met Halsey read through the eyes
of this decision seems somewhat more
daunting than before
The judge also discussed what
mediation can achieve even when all
material has not been assembled to
the level required for a trial and was
prepared to disregard such arguments
in deciding whether mediation would
have worked He shows considerable
understanding of the way negotiations
proceed in mediations by doing so He
commented
Experience suggests that many disputes
even more complex disputes than the
present are resolved before all material
necessary for a trial is available Either
parties know or are prepared to assume
that certain facts will be established
or during the course of a mediation
such information is made available
often on a without prejudice basis The
rationale behind the Halsey decision is
the saving of costs and this is achieved
(or at least attempted) by the parties
being prepared to compromise without
necessarily having as complete a
picture of the other partiesrsquo case as
would be available at trial
He added that getting necessary
information first might be a good reason
for postponing a mediation and for
avoiding an adverse costs order but
this was not the case here
This is often the reason given for not
mediating or even trying to settle
clinical negligence claims until very late
in their life before trial Of course there
is a trade-off between the savings in cost
and time as against less information
about the evidence if earlier settlement
is attempted but what this judgersquos
approach commends is that this should
normally and legitimately be explored
by actual engagement in such processes
rather than by participating in a stand-
off No one is compelled to settle in a
mediation and the court door remains
open to any party who thinks their case
is better heard than settled
The third and more general point to
make about the judgment in HGF v
OFMS is the pleasure it gives to
discover a judge who has an excellent
understanding of the dynamics of
mediation This permeates Recorder
Furst QCrsquos judgment In commenting
on the reasonableness of each partyrsquos
braod approach he comments
In any event the skill of a mediator lies
in drawing out seemingly intractable
positions
Later in relation to the gap between the
parties at the time of the Part 36 offers
and the mediation proposal
The essence of all successful mediations
is a willingness to compromise andor
the realisation that certain points are
not as strong as the party believedhellip
in my view there was a reasonable
prospect that these parties given the
essentially commercial nature of the
dispute and being well advised would
have been prepared to compromise and
or would have accepted that various
points raised were not as strong or
certain as the open position which they
adopted
What next
We can now perhaps anticipate a
generation of judges which was in
private practice in the era during
which mediation has been normalised
and many of whom will have been
fully involved in representing parties
in mediations and acting as mediators
is emerging They will almost certainly
make a considerable difference to
judicial attitudes and understanding
of the mediation process in ways
which articles like this seminars
and theoretical training cannot hope
to match for effectiveness nor even
the publicising of anonymised case
studies bound as mediation is by the
confidentiality provisions which are
what make it work so effectively
16 the barrister
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
TO COURT OR NOT TO COURT THE QUESTION OF ADR OPTIONS IN DILAPIDATION DISPUTESIn many Dilapidation Cases the quantum of damages involved does not make court a cost effective option In others the construction technicalities involved may lead to the parties being reticent over referring the dispute to those without specialist technical knowledge and experience So what alternative options do parties to a Dilapidations dispute have
For claims that warrant the cost perhaps the most obvious option is to seek reference to the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) which operates within both the County and High Courts Claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant are specifically listed within the TCC Practice Direction as being appropriate to bring in TCC which does have the specialist technical knowledge to deal with the issues involved in disputes of this nature including Diminution Valuation arguments
TCC procedures can have the advantage of being more relaxed and may often seek to deal with trials in stages in the hope of reducing cost However they are still court proceedings and although there will be a great deal of effort to keep costs proportional this may not be the answer in the majority of claims
So would Arbitration or Expert Determination be a better option In theory yes Either is extremely well suited to this type of dispute allowing the parties to pursue a resolution with the kind of informality and flexibility that can produce fair and cost effective results However in practice it is not always easy to find one individual with the experience and knowledge to assess all aspects of a claim and appointing a panel can quickly lead to an escalation in costs that makes court start to look like a viable option
Even if a suitable individual can be found one or other party often feels reluctant to be bound by a single personrsquos opinion outside of a court room Their preference is to seek guidance and assessment rather than a binding decision It is within this context that perhaps two of the best options can be considered as a single solution
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding without prejudice assessment of a claim and of its defence at a stage before a dispute even reaches the courts and before major cost is incurred by either party It involves a jointly appointed Expert in the field following flexible procedures in order to guide the parties in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases
In those ENErsquos that I have been involved in I have been able to sit down with the building surveyors around a table to debate the Scott Schedule and clearly identify where points are being pushed too far on a clientrsquos behalf The movement that this alone can create towards a compromise settlement often needs to be witnessed to be believed
A similar exercise can then be undertaken with Diminution Valuers but more often in ENErsquos I am asked to prepare a single Diminution Valuation on behalf of both parties Being part of the ENE process this remains privileged but again it will frequently move the parties closer to being able to settle their differences
In my experience the most important aspect of this option is that it does not bind the parties and they are therefore comfortable being open It does however provide invaluable guidance as to how an impartial mind assesses the situation and so long as the process has been entered into with an honest intent to seek a settlement I have yet to see the parties fail to substantially narrow the gap in their positions Although Mediation can be an option on its own it is at this stage following an ENE that I have seen it be most effective if a settlement has not already been reached Again the process is confidential and without
prejudice so will not leave either party disadvantaged As a result they can afford to be open and to explore a settlement with the knowledge of the likely strengths and weaknesses of their case and without fear of compromising their position
A skilled Mediator armed with an ENE has an extremely strong platform from which to enable the parties to reach a compromise agreement often incorporating elements that are key to them but which would be impossible or extremely difficult to achieve in litigation or ArbitrationExpert Determination
There is always the possibility that one or two issues in a dispute may not be capable of being resolved in this way but even then following the ENEMediation process can lead to a position where the dispute is narrowed to an eitheror scenario that can be put before the court with only minimal issues requiring judgement In this way substantial cost can be saved and a more amicable resolution reached
With ADR and the partiesrsquo conduct being ever more closely scrutinized by the courts ENEMediation is likely to have a strong developing role in dilapidation disputes
John Williams is a Fellow of the RICS an Associate of the CIArb and a Member of the Expert Witness Institute He is a CUBS Accredited Expert Witness and has 18 yearsrsquo experience of Dilapidation Disputes For More Information ContactJohn Williams FRICS ACIArb MEWI
johnwilliamsmapleleaf-pccouk Visit wwwmapleleaf-pccouk
17the barrister
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
18 the barrister
Minority Legal Orders in the UK
By Professor Maleiha Malik
Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Plu-ralism and the Law is a new
report looking at
the distinct religious and cultural norms
of groups such as Jews Christians
Muslims and others whose community-
based laws are often misleadingly de-
scribed as lsquoparallel legal systemsrsquo Since
911 and 77 these alternative legal or-
ders have been mainly discussed in the
context of Islam and sharia law and of-
ten sensationalised by the media as an
ominous threat to our liberal democracy
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
the practical ways in which the state can
respond to and work with minority le-
gal orders The report recommends fur-
ther research to understand the impact
of minority legal orders in the UK and
fully appreciate the impact this legal in-
tegration has on individuals The report
discusses both the historical and con-
temporary experiences of religious and
cultural diversity that underpins minor-
ity legal orders in the UK
Key points raised in the report include
the fact that minority legal orders are
not a new phenomenon As early as the
medieval period Europe had laws that
overlapped - incorporating different
geographical and cultural legal systems
The report notes that in a modern lib-
eral democracy the state is the sovereign
legal system Where there is no conflict
with a human right or an equality right
it is sometimes reasonable for people
to make requests for the legal accom-
modation of their cultural or religious
practices including their minority legal
traditions
Cultural and religious diversity in the UK
is and will continue to be a crucial con-
text in which lawyers and judges make
decisions Personal identities are fluid
and an individual can consider them-
selves part of several cultural and reli-
gious communities But although indi-
viduals have choices about their identity
special attention needs to be paid to en-
sure that vulnerable individuals within
a minority ndash such as women gays les-
bians the elderly and children - are not
caused harm because of membership of
their cultural or religious community
For these reasons Minority Legal Or-ders in the UK Minorities Pluralism and the Law recommends that the Equality
and Human Rights Commission should
examine the impact of minority legal or-
ders on these groups especially women
users who need to have access to reli-
gious marriages and divorces This is
an important part of the EHRCrsquos work to
safeguard the human rights and equality
for all citizens including women from
cultural and religious minorities
Minority Legal Orders in the UK sets out
a mixture of approaches and techniques
can be used in legal and political pro-
cesses to make sure that minorities are
heard liberal democratic values are up-
held and that final decisions have cred-
ibility in the eyes of the majority More
specifically legal techniques that are
available to lawyers and judges include
the twin concepts of lsquocultural volunta-
rismrsquo (which includes lsquoseverancersquo) that
can be a useful guide to adjudication in
the context of legal cases that involve
minority cultural and religious practic-
es Cultural voluntarism allows the mi-
nority legal order to function but it gives
clear precedence to state law especially
where there is a conflict between the mi-
nority legal order and a human right or
equality law Severance is the idea that
the different minority practices (norms
and rules) can be separated so that they
can be assessed and evaluated indepen-
dently of the whole minority legal order
Taken together cultural voluntarism
and severance maintains the right of the
state (judges legislators and public of-
ficials) to pick and choose whether and
how they want to reject recognise or
accommodate the minority practice
Recent decisions of the UK courts illus-
trate the way in which cultural volun-
tarism can work in practice KC amp NCC v City of Westminster Social and Com-munities Services Department amp Anor1
concerned the validity of a marriage
between an incapacitated adult male
resident in England and his bride who
was a Bangladeshi citizen The Court of
Appeal held that a marriage that was
permissible according to the rules of the
local Muslim community was not rec-
ognised under English law because of
public policy considerations Unlike the
European Court of Human Rightsrsquo deci-
sion in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and Others v Turkey2 the UK Court of
Appeal did not make blanket statements
that Muslim legal norms (also sometimes
called the sharia) were always and for
all time incompatible with state law or
democratic values Instead those Mus-
lim norms that were contrary to public
policy were precisely identified and held
to be incompatible with public policy
The flexibility that is available through
a process of cultural voluntarism has
some advantages It may however also
have disadvantages because it can cre-
ate uncertainty A lsquocultural voluntarismrsquo
approach will make it more difficult to
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
19the barrister
predict when how and on what terms
there will be intervention Individuals
who are members of minority communi-
ties may become unsure about whether
or not one of their cultural or religious
practices (such as marriage or divorce)
will be recognised enforced or carry
legal consequences In practice fears
about uncertainty may be exaggerated
The response of the state legal system
will be easy to predict in situations that
involve violence coercion or the clear
breach of a common human right or
equality standard In borderline cases
the state legal system will need to pre-
cisely scrutinise the rules of the minor-
ity legal order to consider the impact
not only on the individual parties and
minority community but also the wider
public interest of the majority
Although cultural voluntarism may cre-
ate some uncertainty this approach also
provides opportunities for the transfor-
mation of the minority legal order Dia-
logue between mainstream state legal
institutions and the minority legal order
can be used to encourage the minority
(cultural or religious) group to reconsid-
er their own norms in the light of liberal
constitutional principles such as equal-
ity One recent example that illustrates
this point is the negotiation between
the Disability Rights Commission and
Muslim religious authorities that led to
the restatement of Muslims norms that
had previously prohibited contact with
dogs This restatement made clear that
Muslims could come into contact with
guide dogs in order to provide services
(such as access to restaurants and taxis)
to the blind and the partially sighted
This particular dialogue between the
Disability Rights Commission and Mus-
lim organisations was so successful in
permanently shifting Muslim norms that
some mosques have now allowed entry
to guide dogs3
A liberal democracy can follow differ-
ent approaches to minority legal orders
ranging from absolute prohibition using
the criminal law through to mainstream-
ing In some situations the norms of the
minority legal order will cause harm to
an individual and they will need to be
prohibited using the full force of the
criminal law where necessary In other
contexts there may be no conflict or a
convergence so that it is possible to in-
corporate some aspects of the minority
legal order without undermining human
rights equality law or public policy In
order to decide which approach is ap-
propriate the state legal system and its
representatives (judges and legislators)
need to have detailed and accurate fac-
tual information about minority legal
orders in the UK This is why it is im-
portant for us to move beyond the sen-
sationalised discussion of this issue that
has focused on Islam and sharia law
Instead we need to have a sensible and
objective public discussion about how
the state can
work construc-
tively with minor-
ity groups and
their minority le-
gal traditions
Author Details
Maleiha Malik is
Professor of Law
at Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
School of Law
Kingrsquos College
University of Lon-
don
Minority Legal
Orders in the
UK Minorities
Pluralism and
the Law was
published by the
British Academy
Policy Centre on
19 April 2012
Copies of the re-
port and the executive summary can be
downloaded at
httpwwwbritacacukpolicyMinori-
ty-legal-orderscfm
1 [2008] EWCA Civ 198
2 Judgment of the European Court of
Human Rights Strasbourg February
13 2003
3 See Maleiha Malik lsquoFrom Conflict to
Cohesion Competing Interests in Equal-
ity Law and Policyrsquo at pp15-16 (Equal-
ity and Diversity Forum London 2008)
Sometimes itrsquos not the piano
that needs restoring itrsquos the pianist
DĂŬĞĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƚŽŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐůŝǀĞƐďLJůĞĂǀŝŶŐĂŝŌŝŶLJŽƵƌtŝůů
ϳͲϭϭƌŝƚĂŶŶŝĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚgtŽŶĚŽŶtϭyϵ^Chairman dŚĞŽŶZŝĐŚĂƌĚgtLJƩĞůƚŽŶŚŝĞĨdžĞĐƵƟǀĞĂǀŝĚ^ƵůŬŝŶ
ZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚŚĂƌŝƚLJEŽϮϮϴϬϴϵ
ampŽƌŵŽƌĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĐĂůůϬϮϬϳϮϯϵϵϭϬϬĞŵĂŝů
ůĞŐĂĐLJΛŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬŽƌǀŝƐŝƚŚĞůƉŵƵƐŝĐŝĂŶƐŽƌŐƵŬ
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
20 the barrister
The politics of fee sharing
By John Binks Bar Consultancy Network
This article looks
at competition for
publicly funded Crown
Court work the impact
of the increasing trend
of solicitors offering
their HCA services to other firms as an
alternative to the independent Bar and
at opportunities for the Bar to respond
with new business models
In 2007 the Legal Services Commission
revised its Advocated Graduated Fee
Scheme (AGFS) It opened the door
for fee sharing in Crown Court cases
and for agency arrangements between
independent firms of solicitors employing
HCAs The Bar Council responded by
suggesting such arrangements were in
breach of both BSB and LSC rules on
referral fees
The LSC contract does prohibits the
payment of referral fees of any kind in
legal aid work (and SRA rules prohibit
payment of referral fees in crime) Both
the LSC and SRA do however allow
agency agreements Consequently if
a bona fide agency agreement exists
then any money changing hands by way
of fee sharing within that agreement
is necessarily not a referral fee In
response to Bar Council concerns the
LSC published Guidance Fee Sharing
Referral Fees of November 2009 The
LSC did not accept the Bar Council
interpretation of fee sharing as lsquoreferral
feesrsquo and in Referral Fees Referral
Arrangements and Fee Sharing in May
2011 the Legal Service Board the BSB
SRA regulator followed suit
Thus the ring fencing that protected
counselsrsquo fee for Crown Court advocacy
was effectively removed
Whilst the Bar Counsel has attempted
to limit the extent of fee splitting
arrangements in AGFS cases between
solicitor and counsel the Barrsquos solicitor
competitors are not subject to similar
professional controls The price
incentives available to solicitors for
referring cases to external HCAs have
become ever more significant HCA fee
splitting arrangements on an individual
case basis are followed by the increasing
emergence of bulk agreements between
firms for the referral of most or all of
their crown court work The fee splits
on such arrangements can result in
the referring firms retaining as much
as 30 value of the work passed on
Within such agreements some of the
most serious top end work will still
leak out to the Bar but even these
volumes of work will decrease as the
HCAs involved become more confident
and more experienced at top end work
This should be an issue for real concern
for the Bar Whilst the largest top end
firms have for some time been able to
retain the majority of advocacy work
with in house HCArsquos the percentage of
overall crime work going through the
biggest firms is in reality fractional The
vast majority of crime work is covered
by mid-range firms who often cannot
justify maintenance of expensive HCArsquos
The opportunities now arising for these
firms to ship out whole-sale their crown
court advocacy in return for a significant
fee split is extremely tempting for them
and extremely damaging to the Bar
Models are emerging that can offer firms
the possibilities provided by solicitors
offering HCA agency services with the
added ( and very significant) advantages
that they are not compelled to deal with
potential competitors and they are able
to continue ot access the services of
experienced and trusted counsel
Whilst the manner in which such
models may operate will vary it should
be expected that the principles on which
they will be based will be common
1 They will supply services direct
In the principle of the Procureco is
not a bad idea A vehicle designed
to secure high volume work to be
allocated to regulated providers can
work exceptionally well Day time TV
carries endless streams of adverts for
companies seeking personal injury
claims and more recently employment
protection insurance based claims
What is questioned is whether buying
into a model that may have potentially
placed the Bar in competition with
companies unregulated to supply legal
services is a good idea The Bar should
perhaps breathe a sigh of relief that
the LSC in particular never warmed to
dealing with Procureco or any other
unregulated middle- man In electing
to do so procurement law may well
have required the LSC to entertain all-
comers compelling them to take bids
from any unregulated company offering
to subcontract LSC work in the manner
of the Procureco
2 As they do supply services direct they will be regulated
A vehicle that contracts and itself
delivers legal services has the
advantage that it can both guarantee
and closely control the manner in which
the services are delivered From the
point of view of any purchaser of legal
services these are extremely attractive
qualities in particular for the LSC and
local authorities for whom the political
and financial cost of failure of delivery
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
21the barrister
bounces back on the purchaser and is
ultimately borne by government Direct
provision means the vehicle must be
regulated within the terms of the Legal
Services Act 2007 In dealing with a
regulated body the client is however
buying a guarantee of quality and
probity the unregulated Procureco or
any other similar vehicle can never
offer
3 For the foreseeable future the choice of regulator will be the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Whilst the BSB does not currently
regulate any structure other than the
traditional chambers model barristers
seeking to change business models do
have a choice of regulator A vehicle
designed and controlled by barristers
with the primary purpose of providing
advocacy services may still elect to
be regulated by the SRA as long as
it includes at least one solicitor at a
managerial level Whilst this new entity
may be an ABS it may well be wholly
lawyer (ie solicitor and barrister)
owned In the latter case the entity may
opt to be a traditional lsquoauthorised bodyrsquo
SRA registration will be quicker and
less complex and the end result may be
more attractive to insurers Whatever
form of model is chosen inclusion of
barristers and a solicitor will create
dual regulation Whilst the barrister
members will personally be regulated
by the BSB the entity will be regulated
by the SRA In cases of conflict as to
what the competing regulations allow
the section 52 of the Legal Services Act
2007 specifies that the entity regulator
will crucially prevail
4 They will concentrate on doing what they do best
At a time when both branches of the
legal profession may profitably support
each other the Bar pursued a Procureco
model aimed at competing direct for
LSC contracts and pursues direct
public access At the same time areas
of the solicitors profession threatens
to lsquoblacklistrsquo any chambers having the
audacity to make change to ensure that
the Bar survives as a referral profession
for publicly funded crime Both halves
of the profession are good at what they
do the models that are most likely to
succeed are those that allow them to
concentrate on that and support each
other
Whilst the creation of such entities
carryrsquos some cost (including an
unwelcome move into the realm of
solicitor insurance) they bring the
opportunity of engagement in current
markets rather than standing in the
side-lines They offer the flexibility
of working together with instructing
solicitors providing services in a
manner that is most efficient and best
suits the client (rather than as dictated
by LSC funding arrangements) They
afford the opportunity of offering
a choice to those now referring or
considering referring advocacy work to
HCA firms Barristers can offer their
services to solicitors on a level playing
field with common regulation
The regulatory arrangements simplified
for the purposes of this article are
complex particularly so in implementing
models designed to reduce or remove
loss of work due to conflict and to allow
the retention of prosecution practices
It is however of course crucial that
regulatory requirements are adhered to
and as both branches move into an
era of outcome focussed regulation it is
not always completely clear how those
requirements may be best demonstrated
The innovations mentioned at the
commencement of this article whilst
unwelcome in some quarters do
operate within the ambit of current
regulatory and contractual BSB SRA
and LSC requirements More informal
practices which have always been
present but which inevitably become
more prevalent when some areas of
work (and associated fees income)
decline are often not
Whilst any professional sanction
is of course serious counsel should
increasingly bear in mind the effect of
any such sanction on the ability to be
involved in new models and associated
tenders for work LSC tenders have
for some time included a requirement
to declare issues arising out of breach
of regulatory requirement This
requirement has not touched counsel to
date but may well do in future Of more
immediate impact are requests for such
declarations now becoming routine
in local authority tenders Breach of
regulatory requirement accordingly
carries with it the possibility of sanction
by regulators and additionally a bar
to future involvement in elements of
competition The personal nature of
any professional sanction could be long
lasting and counsel should always of
course bear in mind their responsibility
for actions of their clerking staff as well
as personal actions
For those that invest time and effort in
change the rewards can be great At
least one SRA regulated entity already
operates within some of the principles
outlined above and others are sure to
follow Whilst the structural change
required is relatively simple the cultural
change required is significant Crucial
is a move from operating on the basis
of personal interest to operating as a
corporate entity with a corporate will
The level of commitment by all involved
and the degree of change that has to be
accepted in order to achieve success
should not be underestimated
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
22 the barrister
Bar Chairman tells Russian Legal Forumndash We must be Committed to the Rule of Law
A judiciary for the 21st century public consultation and Crime and Courts Bill
Chair of Criminal Bar Association The Criminal Justice System is at Risk
Michael Todd QC the Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales told delegates at the second St Petersburg International Legal Forum that the legal community must share a commitment to the rule of law if it is to remain relevant to the societies and clients it serves
Speaking after the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice the Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP concludes his remarks Michael Todd QC who recently addressed the leaders Cayman Islands legal community on ethics and the rule of law will say
As legal services become increasingly globalised it is more important than ever that we share common values which stand above and apart from our commercial interests They are an unerring commitment to the rule of law and an independent and transparent judicial process As lawyers whatever the public perception of us may be if we are to secure the confidence of our commercial clients and the public in a justice system which is and is seen to be fair and equal then we must ensure that it is open and accessible to all and that we act with the highest standards of ethics and integrity
This forum provides an excellent opportunity for us to share our domestic experiences and consider how we can effectively ensure together that we translate those positive examples onto the international stage That is the foundation upon which the relevance and attractiveness of our services must be built
JAC Chairman Christopher Stephens said The JAC welcomes the Governments proposals These include many very positive changes
We are pleased to see provisions to extend salaried part-time working to the High Court and above and for the JAC to have more involvement in the selection of Deputy High Court Judges The principles that there should be a lay chair and an odd number of members for senior selection panels are also positive
In relation to the JAC we are happy the Lord Chancellor wishes to retain the current number of Commissioners for now We also welcome the introduction of a specific provision to clarify that where two persons are of equal merit the JAC can select the more diverse candidate It is essential to be clear on the detail of how this will work in practice We will work with the Ministry of Justice and interested parties on this and will continue to stress that increasing the diversity of the pool of eligible candidates is just as important for judicial diversity
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) response to the consultation can be read on the MoJ website where there is also information about to the Crime and Courts Bill
Max Hill QC Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) warned the Government that the criminal justice system is at risk because barristersrsquo role within it is becoming increasingly less viable
The results of a survey of CBA members show high levels of disaffection at the criminal Bar The majority of respondents had experienced delays in payment from the Legal Services Commission and 89 would be willing to take direct lawful action such as refusal to attend court
Speaking at the CBArsquos Annual Dinner at Middle Temple Hall to an audience including the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales he said
ldquoWho are the guardians of the public interest the gatekeepers for access to justice and the protectors of the rights of the individual in British society Politicians like to think it is they who stand for Joe Public and they who hold greedy lawyers to account But that is not the truth now if it ever was before
ldquo[hellip] We at the criminal Bar uphold the public interest in access to justice and the maintenance of a proper criminal justice system whilst it is the Government who are obsessed by money
ldquo[hellip] I came into this job when elected as Vice Chairman two years ago knowing it would not be easy I knew that against a background of financial recession the new Government would implement the three-year plan for defence fee cuts announced in the dying days of the old Government I knew that the current administration was set on carving up the publicly-funded legal landscape [hellip]
newsround
up
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
23the barrister
CILEx ldquoextremely disappointedrdquo as LASPO Bill is set to become law
Legal Profession Unites For Largest Ever London Legal Walk
New Laws To Promote Diversity Among Judges
The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) is extremely disappointed that after a parliamentary passage that saw it defeated 14 times in the Lords the controversial Legal Aid Sentencing amp Punishment of Offenders Bill (LASPO) now awaits Royal Assent
Chief Executive of CILEx Diane Burleigh said ldquoCILEx is extremely disappointed by the Governments rejection of Lord Pannickrsquos amendment ensuring people should have access to legal services that lsquoeffectively meet their needsrsquo It was absolutely vital that the Bill contained a statement of principle that the purpose of legal aid is to promote access to justice within the available financial resources
ldquoThe Bill still fails to recognise that equal access to the law is fundamental to the functioning of democracy People need to have the means to enforce their legal rights The Bill will remove such means from some of the most disadvantaged groups in society Justice will pay the price of these reformsrdquo
Speaking at CILExrsquos historical graduation on Monday (23 April 2012) Lord Phillips of Sudbury criticised the bill stating ldquoLaw is vitally important in the lives of our fellow citizens more so today than ever before there is no justice in a democracy unless it is available to the poor and the rich
Lord Pannick did not push his amendment further but referring to the coalitions plans for Lords reform said that if he were a member of an 80 elected House he would have pushed his amendment He described the bill as bad but Shadow Justice Minister Lord Bach went further saying that the Bills provisions on social welfare law are not just bad they are wickedrdquo
The legal profession showed their support for the free legal advice sector A record-breaking 6000 people have signed up to participate in this yearrsquos London Legal Walk which last year raised 497000 for legal advice services providing free support and assistance to some of the most vulnerable members of society
The Chairman of the Bar Council which represents barristers in England and Wales and the Presidents of the Law Society which represents solicitors and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) which represents chartered legal executives will be among those leading this 10km sponsored walk around some of Londonrsquos legal landmarks
The London Legal Walk is the largest of many legal walks taking place across the country attracting the support and participation of senior judges lawyers and politicians including the Lord Chief Justice the Master of the Rolls the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Michael Todd QC Chairman of the Bar Council said ldquoAt a time of deep cuts to the public purse including legal aid and local government budgets the funds raised by the London Legal Walk are needed more than ever I am proud to be leading thousands of walkers in support of the many excellent organisations providing free legal advice across London all of which provide vital support to people in their darkest hoursrdquo
More women and people from minority backgrounds will be encouraged to become judges under plans announced by Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
Mr Clarke revealed that new laws would be put in place to remove obstacles which can limit diversity in the judiciary They include changing the rules to extend part-time working patterns for senior judges intended to help balance work and family lives and enabling lsquopositive actionrsquo for appointments ndash meaning that if two candidates are completely equal in their abilities a selection can be made on the basis of improving diversity
The moves will not change the over-riding principle of appointments based on merit but are intended to enable clear career progression encourage applications from a wider talent pool and continue to create a judiciary which reflects society
The changes are the latest part of ongoing work to bring more diversity among judges which is being carried out in partnership with the judiciary the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and the legal professions
Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke
ldquoWe are lucky in this country that we have the finest judiciary in the world We intend to build on that ndash we will continue to recruit the very best judges but at the same time we will do what we can encourage top applicants from a diverse range of backgrounds so that the judiciary better reflects societyrdquo
newsround
up
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
24 the barrister
Personal computers
can be found in three
quarters of British
homes nearly all
permanently connected
to the Internet via
broadband There is scarcely a
business that does not make extensive
use of computers if only for accounts
banking and tax returns There are
130 cellphone contracts per 100 of
the population 11 million of them are
smartphones in effect computers There
is a reinforcing multiplier cheaper
more powerful computers with ever
lower cost bulk storage coupled with
faster communications speeds stimulate
entrepreneurs to create new types of
Internet based services including social
media - which in turn prompts increased
ownership and usage of computers
Everywhere an individual goes extensive
digital footprints are being created all
can become evidence and if not may
need to be disclosed
A few years ago computer evidence
meant printouts of the formal
transaction records of a business plus
the examination of computer hard disks
to recover deleted files But today it is
increasingly difficult to separate out the
cyber elements in peoples lives In a
very wide number of civil and criminal
cases digital evidence particularly
from relatively informal sources such
as emails social network postings
tweets blogs and the like have become
an important part of the building of an
overall case Parallel with the recording
of events on computers directly linked
to individuals are records created by
third parties such as ISPs banks other
financial institutions and many large
organisations ndash much of which can be
obtained via a court order under CPR
3117 or for proposed litigation a
Norwich Pharmacal order1
Digital evidence can show intentions
indications of research even the
movements of individuals over time
The abundance of potential digital
evidence presents both opportunities
for lawyers ndash the possibility of much
detail about a sequence of events ndash
but also a number of challenges the
material has to be located formally
acquired preserved analysed
properly interpreted and then presented
in palatable form to a court With the
greater use of informal material issues
of the probative value of some forms of
computer evidence come to the fore
For many practitioners one suspects
the complexity and size of the tasks only
became apparent when the E-disclosure
rules came into force in October 2010
CPR31 now has a detailed questionnaire
as Practice Direction 31B2 It indicates
the thoroughness with which parties are
expected to discharge their disclosure
obligations But it also provides useful
guidance to finding valuable evidence in
the first place
We can take each one of these challenges
briefly in turn
Evidence location and identification
In criminal proceedings the work of
identifying sources of likely evidence
will probably have been carried out by
the police but in most civil litigation
an important task for both solicitors
and counsel is to assist their client in
understanding what evidence might
exist The e-disclosure questionnaire
was not designed specifically for this but
it helpfully draws attention to such items
as the forms of electronic communication
including e-mail the various types of
electronic documents and electronic
databases ndash and all their back-ups It is
perhaps less good in its current form
in requiring respondents to consider the
range of computers upon which material
may be found and in particular stressing
that much information may now be
located on personally-owned computers
as well as on more obvious corporate
machines
For more complex exercises or where
there is a suspicion of concealment
wilful destruction or forgery it may be
advisable to call in a specialist expert
with knowledge of large corporate
systems
Evidence acquisition
The next stage is the process of formally
acquiring evidence so that it can become
if required an exhibit Activity within a
computer is highly volatile and most
Digital EvidenceManaging the ChallengesBy Peter Sommer
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
25the barrister
digital exhibits are snapshots at a
particular point in time It is all too easy
for evidence to be contaminated in the
course of collection The Association
of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has a
frequently updated publication called
Good Practice Guide for Computer
Evidence3 which contains both general
principles and specific advice For the
individual personal computer the gold
standard is the forensic disk image
Typically the hard disk or other storage
medium is placed in special hardware
which stops the disk being written to and
specialist software is deployed to make
a copy of the entire contents including
locations which appear to be empty
The process freezes the scene but also
optimises the opportunity for advanced
recovery of deleted matter A further
advantage is that once the disk image has
been created the original machine can be
safely left in storage and as many copies
of the disk image supplied to whoever
wishes to examine it
But this procedure plainly does not work
for large computer systems where there
are the twin problems of quantity and the
need to keep the system running during
collection if the business that it is serving
is not to suffer A controlled considered
extract must be taken In this situation
one of the other strictures of the ACPO
guidelines comes to the fore ndash the need
to maintain a full audit trail of all activity
Carried out properly the process of
evidence acquisition produces a witness
who can be cross examined as to what
they have done (and any judgements
they have made during the exercise) but
a series of exhibits which are difficult to
reject
During a live internal investigation
counsel may find themselves asked to
advise on legality of methods ndash what is
technically feasible may be illegal or
attract judicial sanction
Evidence preservation
Preservation of evidence is separate from
acquisition but is part of continuity
The usual method is to deploy digital
fingerprinting or hashing Essentially
once a disk has been imaged or file
retrieved a mathematical procedure is
deployed to create a result any exact
copies should produce the same result
Evidence examination analysis
Most computer examiners begin an
investigation by establishing some basic
parameters a computerrsquos operating
system when it was installed when it
was last used the identity of the main
user accounts and the main programs
But thereafter much will depend on the
instructions they had been given The
size of todayrsquos hard disks and complexity
of operating systems mean it is no longer
possible to expect an exhaustive report
Yesterdayrsquos computer review may have
been like examining a single desk drawer
but today a better analogy is entering an
office full of filing cabinets
A skilled examiner aided by a range of
specialist software is able to locate files
of interest recover deleted material
show patterns of web browsing and
e-mail usage and develop chronologies
of events on the computer In a practical
situation much of this material may
need to be linked to other evidence and
timelines elsewhere in the case
Several traps exist to prevent the analyst
from producing unambiguous results
Windows was not designed to provide
an ultra-reliable method of recording
all activity on the computer but as a
convenient personal operating system As
a result many of the features that would
be ideal in forensic analysis - in terms
of recorded sign-on and sign-off times
account security the clear identification
of dates and times of activity and of
authorship - are simply not available
directly It is often possible to infer such
things but misinterpretation is easy
When a computer is set up it often has
a registered owner there may also be
user accounts and individual programs
such as Microsoft Office may also be
ldquoregisteredrdquo to a named individual
Any of these may appear to point to the
authorship of a document however at
the relevant time some-one else entirely
may have been sitting at the keyboard -
because security is weak
Similar traps exist when establishing
dates and times The ldquofile createdrdquo date
as displayed by the operating system in
fact refers to when the file was first on
that particular computer the file may
have come into existence on another
computer and then copied to the location
where it has been founded The original
location of a file on a hard-disk may speak
to how that file arrived and whether it
is reasonable to infer that an individual
user of that computer had knowledge of
its existence
Evidence presentation
Raw computer evidence is usually not
court-friendly At its most basic it consists
of electromagnetic ones and zeros and
even in the simplest of situations it is
necessary to print out a file ndash a document
or a picture Analytic extractions often
have to be made from original raw
databases and computer histories
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
26 the barrister
Here it is important that sight is never
lost of where this material comes from
even if not directly tendered in evidence
opposing experts will want to go back
to the original and decide whether they
agree with the evidence production
method or come to different conclusions
Print-outs and CDs of extracted evidence
can omit important context
Thus for counsel they have to address
not only the immediate advocacy needs
of court presentation but also the
opportunities for the other side to test
Forensic readiness programs
Slowly large organisations are preparing
themselves for the eventuality that they
may need to be able to produce reliable
evidence from their computer systems
and have a formal planning for doing so
ndash a companion to the document retention
policy and the disaster recovery plan
The consequences of not doing so can
be illustrated by a recent experience
as a single joint expert Evidence for a
contractual arrangements were said to
exist in e-mail exchanges The claimant
produced printouts of a handful of
e-mails the defendant said he had never
seen them Because of the passage of
time none of the original hardware
was available for inspection so that
full-scale forensic disk examination
was impossible The claimant had had
a policy of archiving e-mails of interest
into text files but these have been lost
when a computer had failed all that
remained were informal printouts
which when examined were in a number
of different formats Forgery would have
been trivially easy though there was
no indication that this had occurred
The defendants position was only
slightly better original e-mail archive
files had been retained but again upon
examination it was entirely possible for
someone to enter the folder containing
deleted e-mails and then selectively
carry out further deletes In effect the
dispute had to be resolved without
relying on the computer evidence
Start early
The potential quantities complexity
and constant novelty mean that counsel
have to adapt their case management
skills to include the identification
acquisition analysis interpretation and
presentation of digital evidence if they
are to give clients the necessary quality
of advice
Peter Sommer
More details can be found at
wwwpmsommercom
This article is partly based on his
recent publication from the Information
Assurance Advisory Council Digital
Evidence Digital Investigation and
E-Disclosure A Guide to Forensic
Readiness for Organisations Security
Advisors and Lawyers can be
downloaded from httpwwwiaacorg
uk_mediaDigitalInvestigations2012
1 Norwich Pharmacal Co amp Others v
Customs and Excise Commissioners
[1974] AC 133
2 httpwwwjusticegovukcourts
procedure-rulescivilrulespd_part31b
3 httpwww7safecomelectronic_
evidenceACPO_guidelines_computer_
evidencepdf
The barrister magazine cannot accept responsibility
for information supplied by other parties views
expressed may not necessarily be that of
the editor or publishers
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
27the barrister
The Association of Women BarristersThe future of the AWB is bright We have an engaged and ambitious committee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann Cotcher QC and we continue to hold events to support women at the bar
By Mair Williams Pupil at 187 Fleet Street Chambers and AWB Committee Member
The Association of
Women Barristers
Not the most modern
sounding organisa-
tion but one that has
represented the views
and interests of women at the bar for
over 20 years In that time it is certain-
ly fair to say that the battle lines have
shifted ndash women can now wear trousers
in court (hoorah) are regularly(ish) ap-
pointed judges and even make silk (the
figures in relation to this are both mis-
leading and promising) In some cases
women are also Heads of Chambers al-
though you wonrsquot need more than your
fingers and toes to count them and fe-
male pupils are regularly outnumbering
men The simple truth is that although
things have shifted considerably in the
last 20 years and no one can deny that
progress has been made the AWB re-
mains relevant in providing opportuni-
ties and support for women
Issues concerning QASA and LASPO
have been rehashed and rehearsed in
the pages of every legal publication for
the last year so I do not intend to re-
peat them here What we try to do at
the AWB is examine the issues that di-
rectly affect women within the context
of changes at the bar in general There
would be no merit in focussing solely
on women-centric developments we
have to continue to try and examine
and analyse all changes that affect the
bar The AWB is fortunate enough to
have members that have experience in
1313
1313
13
13
$13$$$$ $$ $$ 13$ $$$$
$$ $$ $
13 13
$$ $ 13$ $$
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
a broad spectrum of legal fields and we
use this breadth to our advantage We
also have male members that afford a
further dimension of opinion and more
male members are always welcome
One of the great strengths of the AWB
is that it brings together women who
embody each facet of the modern bar ndash
self-employed barristers employed bar-
risters CPS advocates Judges pupils
silks law students And that is what
the modern bar has to be about ndash ad-
aptation There is no point in defining
your practice as x and refusing to move
to y and the AWB is all about ways of
adapting your practice to complement
the changing environment What we do
at the AWB is provide frank information
about what different forms of practice
entail and what the advantages and dis-
advantages of each are
A further strength of the AWB is that
it brings together women at different
stages of their careers with different
energies and anxieties Our student
members have an unbridled enthusi-
asm that often borders on obsession for
the self-employed bar No casual cli-
cheacutes about a sinking ship will dampen
their enthusiasm for joining the profes-
sion (just as it didnrsquot for everyone under
ten yearsrsquo call) often at great expense
(personal and financial) to themselves
This passion for the profession serves
as an elixir to the sensibilities of the
sometimes fatigued senior members of
the association who take great solace
in seeing such burgeoning enthusiasm
and in finding ways to be of assistance
to those young hopefuls In exchange
experienced members of the association
are able to provide a warts and all eval-
uation of what is (hopefully) just around
the corner There are not many oppor-
tunities for law students to ask questions
of members of the bar without worrying
about looking stupid or inexperienced
and at the AWB we pride ourselves on
having a no-question-too-stupid mantra
and sticking to it
There remain some issues that will al-
ways be felt more acutely by women in
particular those concerning balancing a
career at the bar with having a family
The AWB have always championed the
potential for the formation of a cregraveche
in one of the Inns and continues to look
at different business models that could
make such an idea work Another con-
cern for women at the bar seems to be
maternity leave a topic that often crops
up in AWB meetings The bar has shift-
ed away from the idea that a woman
who has been through labour has also
undergone a lobotomy (huzzah) but
older members of the AWB tell of how
they were expected to return to work
within days of giving birth or paid full
rent whilst on maternity leave Others
hid pregnancies under their gowns for
months worried about the implications
such a revelation would have on their
practice Nowadays women have chil-
dren and return to have successful prac-
tices most of the time
At the AWB we hear too many stories
of women whose sets still do not have
a maternity leave policy (which deter-
mines possible rent breaks reduced
clerks fees or protocols for notifying so-
licitors) or who struggle to have any flex-
ibility with their working hours when
they return to work This is a topic
which will always split feminists ndash in the
blue corner we have the iron ladies who
believe that women who want to work
even if they have children have to com-
pete on an even playing field to men
No flexi-time No working from home
No early afternoons for the school play
recorder recitaldentist In the red cor-
ner are the more flexible ladies who
believe that when a woman is good at
what she does and she chooses to have
children her profession should support
her to continue to build a successful
practice whilst juggling commitments at
home The latter favour working from
home (when possible) flexible working
conditions (ie scanning papers where
practicable) and not being sent to cases
hundreds of miles away
There is no right way to be a woman at
the bar but often people feel that they
know how-not-to-be a woman at the bar
One example has to be talking about
children As a pupil in chambers one
of my favourite experiences is seeing ag-
gressive demanding burly male mem-
bers of chambers reduced to giggling
schoolgirls when they show you photos
of their children on their phone or coo
over the milestones of their offspring I
cannot imagine the same from a female
member of chambers and perhaps that
is because many of the women in my
chambers with children remember the
days (or were told of the days) when that
simply would not be done
Maternity leave is of course only one is-
sue ndash access to work type of practice
judicial appointments applications for
silk all raise some concern about rem-
nants of sexism although the landscape
is vastly improved What we certainly
find is that a lot of people (men and
women) do not like to discuss these is-
sues within chambers so organisations
like the AWB provide a valuable forum
for support and advice Although not
an anonymous group we respect the
need for barristers to have a place where
they can vent their frustrations and ask
questions without any judgement and
without their being any negative conse-
28 the barrister
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
29the barrister
quences for their practices
The future of the AWB is bright We
have an engaged and ambitious com-
mittee headed by Pamela Oon and Ann
Cotcher QC and we continue to hold
events to support women at the bar In
recent years we have regularly attended
the pupillage fair at Lincolnrsquos Inn held
clinics to assist with OLPASPupillage
portal applications (that include the op-
portunity to discuss your application
one-to-one) and regular clinics to assist
applications for silk Peppered among
these serious events our calendar also
boasts social occasions including a din-
ner in the House of Lords to celebrate 20
years of the AWB
We have done our best to broaden our
reach as well holding a successful semi-
nar on the law in relation to prostitu-
tion in partnership with the CPS and the
English Collective of Prostitutes in April
this year The intention is for similar
events to take place in the Autumn with
a view to future events being CPD ac-
credited Possible future topics include
forced marriage and human trafficking
We have also increased our presence
online by joining twitter (womenbar-
risters) and facebook (wwwfacebook
comassociationofwomenbarristers) in
order to complement our website (www
womenbarristerscouk) Even though
we continue to grow and expand we
have kept our membership costs as low
as possible particularly in respect of
student members who still only pay pound10
year and we are committed to making
as many of our events as possible free
The bottom line is that the bar in gen-
eral is waking from the inertia that has
dogged it for the best part of a decade
and the AWB is part of that awakening
It is not about advancing the plight of
women at the bar at the expense of men
that would be ridiculous and the bar
faces enough challenges without turning
on itself It is simply about being part
of a more modern vibrant English bar
which has organisations that seek to
protect and advance the interests of its
members The AWB is such an organi-
sation No bra-burning no man-hating
just good advice
Market Leaders in Drug amp Alcohol Testing
ScreenSafe UK provides a single source
solution for all drugs and alcohol testing
needs Whether you are a Legal or Medical
professional involved in family law forensic
evidence psychiatric practice or DNA
or an Employer concerned about the effects
of drugs and alcohol on your business In
combining our ever increasing number of
world leading products and services with
our proven track record of high levels of
customer service and quality we guarantee
that we are unrivalled by any other UK
organisation
Our Services include
Drug and Alcohol Screening | Family law cases forensic requirements psychiatric treatments compliance testing expert witness via Hair Analysis Workplace pre-employment randomunannounced For-Cause and compliance testing via urinalysis or saliva ISO9001 UKAS COFRAC and ISO17025 accredited services meeting both UK and International standards and codes of practice
Expert Witness | Our experts include the President of the International Association of Forensic Toxicologists the President of the International Society of Hair Testing and other UK European leading forensic toxicologists
DNA Testing | For nearly a decade our Genetic Services laboratory has been one of the leading DNA facilities in the World Specialists in providing an unrivalled range of accredited (ISO 17025 and ISO 9001) Paternity and DNA testing services Accredited for Ministry of Justice testing services
National Collection Network | 24 hoursday 365 daysyear providing collections at any location within 2 hours of receiving a call
Policy Development | 18 years of experience ranging from advice on setting up a policy through to sample collection and analysis
Management Training | Structured courses to equip Managers with the knowledge and skills necessary for policy maintenance
Support Software | Our RandomSelecta has been specially developed to establish a legally defensible selection process for testing
For further information Tel 08450 505590wwwscreensafeukcouk
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
30 the barrister
Recently I spent time
speaking to some 20
sets of Chambers to
discover more about
their strategies for
responding to the
challenges faced by the Criminal Bar
in particular I deliberately chose sets
that are perhaps less well known since
I believe that they are making up for
their reduced profile by being at the
cutting edge of change To compare
and contrast I also spoke to a leading
regional set
In this article I will draw together some
of the key findings of my admittedly
unscientific survey of the sets Just
by way of a disclaimer and to avoid
upsetting any of those I interviewed and
have not quoted directly I am only using
a selection of quotes but the conclusions
are based on all of my interviews
Finding 1 The Commercial Imperative
One Paper Buildings which comprises
five QCs and 41 juniors is a mid-
sized but highly ranked chambers
that has confronted the need to
compete successfully in a dramatically
changing market Central to its future
development has been the imperative for
a clear strategy and a more commercial
approach to running the business And
just as has happened with the legal
profession on the other side of the
fence so increasingly Chambers need
to view themselves as businesses as
well as practitioners of an honourable
profession
Some four years ago One Paper Buildings
hired its first Marketing Director Brett
Carver Brettrsquos brief was not simply
to organise events and put together
pretty brochures he was specifically
taken on to work closely with the
Senior Clerk Mark Cornell and the
heads of Chambers to address the whole
operation of the Chambers Business
was not a dirty word the Chambers set
itself clear objectives of increasing fees
and profitability and broadening the
work base Speculate to accumulate - to
use that old business handbook dictum
This was a bold move and broke
new ground Criminal sets had rarely
before been inclined to have a senior
commercially-oriented individual
assisting clerks with marketing and
business development initiatives Brett
Carver explains how he went about his
task of working with the senior Clerk
and the heads of Chambers ldquoWhen
I first joined my initial remit was to
look at how the Chambers presented
itself Early projects included instigating
a quarterly newsletter for our clients
developing a direct access website
and then re-designing the chambers
website This coincided with a change
in rules in how Chambers could market
We recognised the absolute importance
of how we presented ourselves on our
website which was - and is - often
the first contact point for prospective
clientsrdquo
The two looked closely at the financial
management of the Chambers
analysing costs to the last detail (ldquoeven
down to where we source biscuits for
client meetingsrdquo jokes Mark Cornell)
and implementing weekly rather than
monthly or quarterly meetings of the
number crunchers to ensure regular
monitoring of the business It was
a direct leap almost from the 19th
Century to the 21st Century
Other sets have recruited top people
in management positions Great
James Street a specialist set in
crime extradition immigration and
administrative law hired Senior Clerk
Michael Bazeley to focus on the business
of the set New Park Court Chambers
in Leeds recruited Michael Meeson to
be its first Chief Executive about a year
ago That was quite a catch he had
been responsible in his previous set for
increasing earnings nearly fivefold in
his 10-year tenure
Finding 2 Recruit Selectively
The focus on business is also determining
Chambersrsquo recruitment policy Where
Not broken but in need of fixingThe Criminal Bar is facing challenges on several fronts pressure on fees a downturn in top-quality instructions and above all the governmentrsquos predicted pound350m reduction in the legal aid budget Chambers are responding to these challenges by diversifying and becoming more commercially focused as Guy Hewetson writes
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
31the barrister
before the old boysrsquo net might have
influenced which barristers joined
those joining now have to prove a
business case - again as happens when
law firms make up partners Typically
many sets operate on the 8020 rule -
80 of revenue generated by 20 of
members - and that means that they
cannot afford to make poor choices on
potential tenants One Paper Buildings
does not accept this percentage rule
with each tenant expected to generate
an income above their peers elsewhere
Mark Cornell continues ldquoWe recently
took on another silk as this was part of
our wider strategy We are very selective
in our recruitment decisions as we
donrsquot want to dilute the brand Our focus
is very much on qualityrdquo
Michael Bazeley Senior Clerk Great
James Street puts it this way ldquoThe
reduction in fees is a major issue facing
all sets particularly those specialising
in criminal work This has forced us
not only to go further afield to acquire
work but also to be more selective
when recruiting new members of
Chambers Although our building could
accommodate a lot of barristers in this
day and age it would be foolish to flood
it with rent fodderrdquo
However added to that business
proposition Chambers are increasingly
assessing whether prospective new
tenants will lsquofitrsquo into the set That
will incorporate the type of case taken
on but also whether the person is
culturally compatible and shares the
same objectives as the rest of the set
Those sets that are struck in the mindset
that they will recruit and then lsquowork itrsquo
afterwards are barking up the wrong
tree
Finding 3 Donrsquot Merge
The focus on business quality and
common purpose in turn has a
bearing on the next big challenge for
the profession consolidation Or put
another way to merge or not to merge
Almost universally in London the view
was that wholesale merger was a
doomed strategy It is near-impossible
to find two sets of exact compatibility to
create a bigger and better set Rather
the sets to whom I spoke favoured the
carefully identified courting of teams of
barristers
Michael Bazeley says ldquoMergers are
rarely successful unless the parties are
prepared to put aside preconceived ideas
and actually complement each other It
is unlikely that we would merge with
another set though
we would not be
closed to the idea
if unexpectedly a
suitable opportunity
were to present
itself However we
would certainly
contemplate taking
on small groups
of barristers to
strengthen our
existing teams and
specialist areasrdquo
Brett Carver
agrees ldquoWersquove
been in situations
where we could
have considered
taking on 30-plus
members but we
donrsquot subscribe to
the view there is
safety in numbers we feel that is a
misguided approach If five of those
members were of interest to us
commercially then undoubtedly that is
something we would consider seriouslyrdquo
Where mergers might be more viable
is outside London Consolidation makes
more sense in the regions bringing
together sets of Chambers in different
cities A good example is the merger
of Park Court Chambers in Leeds and
New Court Chambers in Newcastle to
create - as you can probably guess -
New Park Court Chambers Michael
Meeson says that the set is also entering
into a business relationship with Citadel
Chambers in Birmingham to create a
platform for a wider marketing of the
collective group throughout the country
As specialists in holistic financial planning and
portfolio management we give our clients
confidence and peace of mind that they will
achieve the retirement they desire
CONFLICT FREE | PERSONAL | HIGH QUALITY
If you would like to discover how we can add value to you please contact Matthew on
01234 851797 or
maitchisonclearvisionfpcouk
wwwclearvisionfpcouk
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority under reference 561927 Registered in England amp Wales 07514108
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
Finding 4 The Legal Aid Bill will
result in access to justice being denied
By the time this article is printed the
Legal Aid Bill (LAPSO) will probably
become law Many feel that this is a
travesty Michael Bazeley comments
ldquoKen Clarkersquos predicted reduction of
approximately pound350m is potentially
damaging to peoplersquos civil liberties It
is everyonersquos fundamental right to be
protected by the law The legal aid and
British justice systems were once the
envy of the world [but] I wonder for
how longrdquo
Michael Meeson is also scathing ldquoWith
the reduction in legal aid and generally
a cutting down of resources many
people who cannot afford privately to
instruct are potentially left in difficulty
Whilst there is a limit to what any one
set can achieve I hope collectively the
profession can contribute to the mutual
effort all over the country to achieve
justice for vulnerable clientsrdquo
Finding 5 Diversify
The division between criminal
commercial and common law practices
is another area that is ripe for change
The enterprising Chambers are
realising that there are benefits from
crossover practices In particular
sets are realising the benefits that
can be brought to their reputation by
combining the advocacy skills of the
Criminal Bar with the greater focus on
advisory work generally associated with
the Commercial Bar Mark Cornell notes
ldquoCorporate businesses do very much
buy into the skill set that the Criminal
Bar provides One Paper Buildings
has already successfully increased its
regulatory HampS and financial workrdquo
Michael Meeson says ldquoWe looked at
making sure we balance the public sector
work with privately funded work so that
there was not an undue dependence on
the public purse We have also looked
at much more focused marketing and
recruitment to enable us to offer a wider
range of services more relevant to the
present market place Examples of this
are regulatory work health and safety
work Court of Protection work costs
environmental and civil fraud as well as
broadening our whole civil commercial
and chancery componentrdquo
The diversity of practice coupled with
the earlier merger is offering a powerful
proposition he adds ldquoWe are confident
and able to embrace the future in
whatever way it finally develops Indeed
we want to encourage applications on
that basis from all areas of civil and
commercial work as well as crimerdquo
Diversifying does not only need to be
domestically focused More and more
Chambers are looking to international
opportunities to help not just to offset
potential loss of earnings in the UK but
also to sell the world-leading expertise
of the English Bar to jurisdictions far
and wide
Michael Meeson continues ldquoABSs will
provide a basis of some very exciting
business opportunities and the Bar
should embrace them The direct access
system is a very valuable one and the Bar
is seeing some very good results from
that and New Park Court Chambers will
build on that in the future A lot more
publicity needs to be put out about the
value of the direct access system and we
need to market a lot more as individual
sets However it is a very positive move
for the future As to international work
we ourselves are looking at work in the
Caribbean as well as work in particular
areas in Europe The regional Bar
should not assume that all international
work will be channelled into London
and the regional Bar has a lot to offer
internationally That will be a major
plank of any future development within
New Park Court Chambersrdquo
Michael Bazeley explains Great James
Street is of a similar mindset ldquoPublic
access has proved fruitful of late All of
our eligible members are qualified to
receive instructions and do so on a fairly
regular basis The emerging markets
are something we are paying particular
attention to Alun Jones QC our Head
of Chambers is repeatedly instructed by
foreign governments and private clients
alikerdquo
Finding 6 Think collectively not
individually
Counter-intuitive though it may be for
a profession rooted in individuality
the future lies in greater sharing of
information and teamwork In this
barristers need to follow the example
of the more enlightened law firms
Partners who used to keep information
about their clients to themselves - lsquotop-
pocket informationrsquo - and not share
their clients with their own partners
have long recognised that their firms
benefit if they put the greater good
above their own self-interest So it is
with barristers The trend is towards
greater team mentality which will reap
dividends
32 the barrister
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
33the barrister
So what does the future hold In short
plenty of challenges Add to the mix
the ABSs that open up new types of law
firms direct access to barristers and the
increasing opportunities for international
work and it is clear that Chambers are
going to have to embrace the brave new
world ldquoThe key to the future is exploring
a wider range of work and not being
frightened to sell this profession more
broadlyrdquo says Michael Meeson ldquoThe
value the Bar brings to our national
life should not be underestimated and
I think we will come out of the present
changes far more robust and able to
embracerdquo
Guy Hewetson is a founder and partner
of Hewetson Shah a firm of leading
legal search and recruitment specialists
Hewetson Shah offers expert full-service
assistance in search and recruitment for
the Bar
wwwhewetsonshahcom
Hewetson Shah LLP
Direct +44 (0)203 008 5598
Mobile +44 (0)7531 674 203
We understand that for Barristers cash flow can be unpredictable at the best of times
Limited bank funding availability delays in receiving completed case payments not to mention the legal aid remuneration issues presently in focus can all prove to make firm budget planning very difficult
At LDF Professions we have refined our Barrister funding options providing you with an enhanced finance solution Repayment terms are available from 6 months to 5 years allowing you to better accommodate for the inevitable peaks and troughs in income that are inherent to Barrister life
Our unsecured loan facility can be utilised for a number of purposes including
Aged Debt FundingTax LiabilityChambers FeesPension FundingWorking CapitalCapital ExpenditureIT amp Software FinanceVehicle Funding
In our experience your case load is busy enough without the added concerns of arranging finance
Contact LDF Professions today
01244 527300infoldfcouk | wwwldfcouk
Professional funding solutions for BarristersTailored to suit you
LDF Professions is a trading name of Leasedirect Finance Limited part of the Investec group of companiesEst 1986 | Registered address 2 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP | Registered in England amp Wales
Barrister_0212
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
SPS
Stockport Psychology ServicesProven Expert Quality for Two Decades
The largest independent psychology practice in the North West specialising in Public andPrivate Family Law and Criminal cases
Experienced Psychologists (Clinical Forensic Child Educational and Counselling) andPsychiatrists available for expert reports advice training and therapy services
With a history spanning two decades and a large number of experienced professionalsStockport Psychology Services offers a convenient and trusted service providing high quality
assessments and a reliable service
x Public and Private Law risk assessmentsx Parenting capacity assessmentsx Mental health assessmentsx Child development assessmentsx Family assessmentsx Contact and Residence issues
x Ability to protectx Child placementx Training and educationx Alcohol and substance misuseassessments
x Cognitive and capacity assessments
We comply with and exceed the requirements of the LSC and the Family Justice System
Tel 0161 476 4488 Fax 0161 476 4499Email officespsuknet
Norbury Chambers 2-6 Norbury Street Stockport SK1 3SHwwwspsuknet
EX
PE
RT
WIT
NE
SS S
ER
VIC
ES 34 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
gtLHYLHWYVMLZZPVUHSAumlYTVMNLULYHSWYHJ[PJLJOHY[LYLKZY]L`VYZYLNSH[LKI`[OL90IHZLKPU4HPKZ[VUL2LU[VMMLYPUNHJVTWYLOLUZP]LYHUNLVM]HSH[PVUHUKZY]L`PUNZLY]PJLZVMWYPTHYPS`YLZPKLU[PHSWYVWLY[PLZ[OYVNOV[3VUKVUHUK[OLZV[OLHZ[
gtLHJ[WYV]PKLYLWVY[ZHUKNP]LL]PKLUJLPUVY[HZ_WLY[gtP[ULZZLZPUJVTWSPHUJL^P[O7HY[VM[OLP]PS7YVJLKYL9SLZ 79MVY
CHARTERED SURVEYORS COVERING KENT LONDON AND THE SOUTH EAST
3P[PNH[PVU+PZW[LZ5LNSPNLUJL 0UOLYP[HUJL[H_VTWSZVY`WYJOHZLHUKJVTWLUZH[PVU+LI[YLJV]LY`0UZVS]LUJ`
CRANBORNEASSOCIATES
C H A R T E R E D S U R V E Y O R S amp V A L U E R S
Barham Court Teston Maidstone Kent ME18 5BZT 01622 618757 E infocranborneassociatescom
W wwwcranborneassociatescom
IFICEstablished in 1970 we have rapidly become leading global investigators of res and explosions in commercial industrial and marine environments
From investigating res connected to engineering failures pollution or manslaughter our multidisciplinary services are expertly tailored to suit clientsrsquo individual needs
All investigations can be prepared for litigation by our highly-qualied investigators who have the proven calibre to give evidence in Court and produce rst class reports
Provision of investigators for
Standing as Expert Witnesses in court Litigation support
Summary preliminary and full report writing
Internal company investigationsCourt cases including photographic evidence and diagrams Statements and precognitions
0800 862 0511wwwiccoukfollow us on twitter icforensics
The leading international forensic investigators
35the barrister
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
Helping you
Flourish
22 Wycombe End | Beaconsfield Tel 01494 739500wwwharwoodhuttoncouk
business advisersaccountantstax consultantsregistered auditorsforensic specialists
Experienced counsel are increasingly recommending the specialist mediators at Expedite Resolution
and Trust Mediation using mediation as an exceptionally useful tool IRUVHWWOLQJGLIiquestFXOWFODLPVHDUOLHU
IRXDUHDGYLVLQJRQDGLIiquestFXOWFODLPWKHVHPHGLDWRUVVSHDNRXUODQJXDJH
Specialist mediation and dispute resolution services for all non personal injury claims in the claims
DQGLQVXUDQFHVHFWRU6SHFLDOLVWSHUVRQDOLQMXUPHGLDWLRQ
Tel 0844 879 3166ZZZExpediteResolutioncom
For counsel who mediate
Tel 0207 353 3237 ZZZTrustMediationorguk
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 36 the barrister
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
the barristerE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS SE
RV
ICE
S
Fa m i l y A s s e s s m e n t s
Expert Witnessfor the Family CourtDomestic violence and abuse risk assessmentbull Consultant Forensic Psychologistbull 15 years experience in domestic violence
and abusebull Credibility of a report from a real specialistbull Clear and accurate time and cost structurebull In disputed contact residency cases
or care proceedings
Dr Mark C FarrallBABScMScPhDCUEW
Suite 155 RampR Consulting Centre41 St Isan Road Heath Cardiff CF14 4LWTel 0700 394 6217Fax 0700 394 6217Email infoignition-learncom
bull Chartered Forensic Psychologist
bull 15 years experience in domestic violence and abuse
bull Trained in Expert Witness role and requirement ndashCUBS Civil amp Family certificates
bull Clear and accurate time and cost structure
bull Reports in six weeks from acceptance of instruction
BABScMScPhDDip PsychodraCUEW
37the barrister
NCC Group is a global provider of information assurance services with a large number of resources to call on our forensic team has government security clearance
Our services cover the following but are by no means limited to
eDiscovery Incident Response Malware Investigation Expert Witness Mobile Device Forensics Forensic Readiness Review Computer Misuse Litigation Support
Depending on where you are our response time to you could be as little as 5 minutes and never more than 4 hours
Experts in Information Forensics
For more information please call the team on 0161 209 5111
or email barristernccgroupcom
wwwnccgroupcom
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
chartered surveyors amp property consultants
gt2=gtBltgtA3gt8====+509ltgt27=6=Please contact
Robert FourtGerald Eve LLPWelbeck StreetLondon W1G 0AY
Tel 020 7333 6202rfourtgeraldevecom
wwwgeraldevecom
Independence
Integrity
Authority
Institute of Occupational MedicineExpert Witness Services
The Institute of Occupational Medicine is a major independent centre of scientific excellence in the fields of occupational and environmental healthWe provide expert witness services in occupational disease caused by exposure to chemical and physical agents manual handling amp workplace accidents
IOMrsquos experts regularly provide opinion in relation to claims for x Occupational diseases caused by exposure to substances
deemed hazardous to health eg cancer asthma silicosis x Assessment of retrospective exposure to asbestos and
determination of the subsequent risk x Irritant and Allergic Dermatitis x Musculoskeletal disorders x Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger
All of our experts if required can perform on-site risk assessments and exposure measurements supported by our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory which is equipped to undertake a wide range of sample analyses
Tapton Park Innovation Centre Tel 01246 557866Brimington Road email andystellingiom-worldorgTapton wwwiom-worldorgChesterfield S41 0TZ
Highways amp TrafficSafety LtdP FA
PAF has been established since 1995 and is a well respected consultancyproviding independent expert advice and support to the UK LegalProfession Insurance Industry and Highway Authorities PAF specialisein Road Safety Engineering Road SafetyAuditing and Traffic Management
Services include
Forensic CollisionAnalysis amp ReconstructionScene InvestigationCollision 3DAnimationLocus ReportsVehicle ExaminationTachographAnalysisTransport Health amp SafetyConflict StudiesRoad SafetyAudits amp AssessmentsHighway Maintenance IssuesInvestigation of Non-Compliance of Highway Design amp Standards
Paul Fenton Director of the company and former Metropolitan PoliceForensic Collision Investigator amp Vehicle Examiner has considerableexperience in the field of road safety and highway design and isrecognised by the Highways Agency as a Road Safety Audit Team LeaderHe is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Highways amp TransportationInstitute of Highway Engineers Institute of Traffic Accident Investigatorsand Society of Road SafetyAuditors
Forensic Collision Investigation
The Old Vicarage 5 Ancliffe Lane Bolton-le-SandsCarnforth Lancashire LA5 8DS
Tel 07775766454 Email infopafcoukwwwpafcouk
IumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
IumlIumlIumlIumlIuml
7HENIumlITIumlCOMESIumlTOIumlCOMPUTERSIumlITIumlPAYSIumlTOIumlGETIumlAIumlRELIABLEIumlQUOTEIuml
IumlIuml
Iuml
sup3ampRPSXWHUVLQWKHIXWXUHPDZHLJKQRPRUHWKDQWRQVacute
plusmn3RSXODU0HFKDQLFV
sup37ZRHDUVIURPQRZVSDPZLOOEHVROYHGacute
plusmnLOODWHV
XPERTSIumlINIumlOMPUTERIumlampORENSICSIuml
WWWLEYSONDATACOMIuml4ELIumlIumlIumlIuml
the
barr
iste
rE
XP
ER
T W
ITN
ESS
SE
RV
ICE
S 38 the barrister
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
When building a compelling child protection case only the most robust evidence countsConcateno TrichoTech delivers unparalleled quality in hair testing services for drug and alcohol use as well as a range of sobriety tests to support abstinence using other sample types
wwwconcatenocomTel +44 (0)29 2054 0542 | childprotectionconcatenocomConcateno TrichoTech 1 Pentwyn Business Centre Wharfdale Road Cardiff CF23 7HB UK
copy Concateno 2012 MCP0021 Ed005 An Aleretrade Company
Concateno TrichoTech is Europersquos most widely accredited laboratory to perform drug testing in hair to the International Standard ISOIEC 17025
Longest established hair testing laboratory in the UK ndash over 15 years of analysis
Unrivalled database over 1000000 hair tests to reference
Collecting officers trained with both class-based sessions and in situ in hair and blood sample collections
Appointments for sample collections arranged within 1 working day
Strict chain of custody ndash all hair samples analysed in our Cardiff laboratory
A trained Expert Witness team who can back their reports in person in court
Dr Claire GeorgeLaboratory Director
When it matters most Concateno TrichoTech is the name to trustThe UK provider of drug and alcohol testing services accredited by UKAS to ISOIEC 17025 (schedule available at wwwukascom lab reference number 2212) If a provider doesnrsquot display the UKAS testing symbol with their laboratory number they are not accredited for drug testing ndash donrsquot risk anything else 2212
Justice is only a hairrsquos breadth away
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM
Order now at wwwlexisnexiscoukbstones and get free postage and packaging
A division of Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR Registered in England number 2746621 VAT Registered No GB 730 8595 20 LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc copy LexisNexis 2012 0412-065 The information in this advert is current as of April 2012 and is subject to change without notice
1918
2009
2012
1966
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual first published
Women over 30 got the vote
England won the World Cup at Wembley
The new Supreme Court heard its first case
Stonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual 2012
1842
170 years of helping you get it rightStonersquos Justicesrsquo Manual
0412-065 Stones Adverts_A4indd 1 42512 259 PM