The Anti Terrorist First Broadcast Redux

8/14/2019 The Anti Terrorist First Broadcast Redux

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-anti-terrorist-first-broadcast-redux 1/4

heAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press would like to take this opportunity to point out that in these

litigious times it's easy to lose sight of the fact that we—as a community of kindred souls—once

valued common sense. So cast back in your memory to that long-forgotten concept and embrace the

act that the TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press stand above all for freedom and personal

responsibility. Simply stated, how you apply this information in your own life has nothing to do with

us. These transcripts are for education and entertainment purposes only.

TheAntiTerrorist First Broadcast Redux

Broadcast on 4 December 2007

Hello friends, I am TheAntiTerrorist. Please excuse the mask and the theatrics, but in acountry where you can be thrown into a cell just for speaking your mind or questioning the

status quo, I’m afraid it’s entirely necessary. And since, in the untied States at the momentthere’s a bill about to come out that is nicknamed ‘The Thought Crime Bill,’ which is The

Violent Radicalisation Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill essentiallymakes what I am doing right now illegal and could have me thrown in a cell.

It’s this new bill that’s about to be ratified in The States that’s prompted me to re-shoot thisvideo—this is actually a re-shoot of my original introduction video that I put up on YouTube

in September (07). Since September I’ve lost track of how many people have written to me, begging me to take my mask off or try to goad me into taking my mask off.

I wear this mask for two very important reason—very important to me, anyway. The first

one being that I’m a very private person. I value my privacy very highly and I will not giveit away at any cost. The second reason is the bill I’ve just mentioned to you. Essentially,whatever happens in The States is going to happen here in the UK very shortly and I’m

trying to protect myself from that. That is why I hide my IP address, I disguise my voice andI hide my face.

The information I have to present to you is far more important than my identity, so I hope

my explanation will allow your curiosity to be put to bed and will allow you to activelyengage in the conversation that I’m trying to instigate.

Another reason why I’m wearing a mask is to help you with your conditioning, to help youget used to the fact that our police will soon be wearing masks, too; masks that will enablethem to be unaccountable, and to protect them form you whilst they are exercising theirridiculous statutory powers upon you.

So why am I doing this? What is the point of these broadcasts? If you’ve been living in acave for the past five years you’ll know that the New World Order is very much alive andwell and it’s progress is accelerating at an exponential rate. You will have noticed that in the

past two to three years the sheer number of police on today’s streets has increased

exponentially, too. Not all of them are real police officers, some of them are community



support officers, but they are certainly more visible, and I would contend that we are nowliving in a police state. Tony Blair certainly put that legislation into place and Gordon Brown

could activate it at any point. We could go into martial law at eight o’clock tomorrowmorning if absolutely necessary. All of the cogs and gears are in place for that to happenquite easily.

Now I want to make it very clear that I am not a conspiracy theorist—I like to be called aconspiracist. I do not like to deal in theory. Every bit of information I will present to you will

be backed up by facts.

There may be a certain amount of conjecture and hearsay, but the majority of it will beprovable. I may assert certain things that may only have circumstantial evidence to back itup at this present time, but I believe them to be true and that is the context within which I

offer it. For instance, 9/11 was an inside job...I have no doubt whatsoever in my mind, eventhough all we really know as fact is that two planes hit two buildings and three buildings fell

down. Those are the facts. Everything else is hearsay and conjecture, but, the circumstantialevidence certainly points to it being an inside job, if not gross negligence and complicity.

Now if you are open-minded enough and educated enough to look for videos like mine, tostudy them carefully and to have a political opinion, you will know what is going on in the

states at the moment. You’ll know that 9/11 was an inside job. You’ll know that the 9/11commission report was a whitewashed farce. You’ll know that the Federal Reserve and TheBank of England are private enterprises loaning money to the government at interest. Youwill know that the income tax goes primarily to pay off the interest on those loans. You’ll

know that there is no law compelling a US citizen to pay a tax on his sweat equity. Nowyou’ll have an opinion on those things and you’ll think, “Wow, America’s a bit screwed.”And you’ll say to yourself, “Well, I’m glad that’s not going on here in good old Blighty, good

old Britain,” but while you were asleep, Tony Blair had been empowering himself and thegovernment in the same way that George Bush has. And Gordon Brown is carrying on thetorch. And you think to yourself, “Well, our prime minister wouldn’t be as much of a despotas George Bush has been. “ But you would be very wrong, I’m afraid.

Recently there was a demonstration outside parliament—anti-hunting demonstration. But

that was just a distraction, because what was going on inside parliament was far moresinister. Inside, Tony Blair was passing the legislative and regulatory reform bill, which basically gives him wartime powers,

I know for a fact that most of us awake Brits are watching the 200 & 2004 election and re-

election of George Bush with our mouths agape, wondering what the hell was going on. Andall the while, while we were sleeping, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown had a pint in a pub and

just decided to switch horses mid-race, and no one batted an eyelid.

No one thinks it’s slightly odd that we two, without a referendum, without so much as a by-

your-leave, we now have a new leader no one voted in. No one even noticed that. Incredible.



For the first time in British political history, the party gets to switch horses in the middle of the race and no one gets to say a word about it. If Gordon Brown had been the (?) leader of

the Labour party when they first got into power, Labour would not have got into power.Gordon Brown was not liked then, and he is not liked now. But somehow we have him inpower. Bizarre, don’t you think?

You Americans think you’ve got problems—you might not know this, but London has thehighest concentration of CCTV cameras in the whole world. There is not a sin to force you toput your camera away.gle place in central London you can walk without being caught on

camera from some angle or other. We are watched everywhere we go, an, of course, it is allfor our safety.

When you try pointing a camera in central London at any one of our glorious police officers

for more than 2 or 3 minutes, you’ll soon be told to turn that camera off, sharpish, and they’lluse the antiterrorism legislation and threats and coercion to force you to put your camera

away. But of course, if you turn around and point to the nearest (cctv) camera and say, “Wellwould you mind not filming me, then?” They’ll just laugh and try and have a little joke withyou because, of course, they’re just doing their job.

And that’s my main concern, of course, is they answer to a corrupt government, and they are

compromised and they are a danger to us, unless we (re)educate them.

And then we have 7/7 in London, which was a devastating event, but of course we Brits areused to a bit of terrorism and we got back on with our business the next day. And that

philosophy was what allowed Tony Blair to ignore our calls for an investigation, because of course, we had David Shayler, an ex-MI5 employee offering his educated opinion on the daythat it was an inside job as well. And of course, there were a lot of other coincidences

involving training exercises going on at the same time at exactly the same Tube stations. inexactly the same manner, as happened on 9/11 with regards to the NORAD stand downdebacle,

So, essentially, there are a lot of unanswered questions regarding 7/7 and there’s noinvestigation going on and we’re told to just forget about it and move on with our lives,

though I personally believe it was another contrived event like 9/11 and that ourgovernments are using these two contrived events to try bringing about statutory legislationwith a view to removing our civil liberties, our personal freedom and our privacy.

Now there may well be individuals in Iran or Iraq who buy into The American Dream and

the idea of the freedom that they think we have, and they may be very jealous and may wantto take it away from us, but those two events, 9/11 and 7/7 in London were manufacturedevents with a view to forwarding the New World Order agenda.

Now you might say to yourself that if you’ve got nothing to hide, why worry about the

cameras, why worry about the legislation—when a policeman stops you, you just empty



your pockets, there’s nothing to fear from the policeman. Well, the bottom line is, we have a basic right to privacy. I personally am a huge privacy advocate. So every now and then I

might be walking through Parliament Square and I might stop and talk to Brian Haw. And of course, I’ll get the odd policeman coming over, takes out his notepad and says, “Can I haveyour name please?” and I ask him certain questions. “Am I obliged to give you thatinformation?” And then, of course, the police officer has to smile and say, “No, you are not.”

And I say, “Well, thank you very much. Have a good day.” And they smile and they turnaround and walk away. And that’s all it takes.

Now my question to you non-believers out there is, how much government corruption areyou prepared to accept before you understand and (conceive? concede?) that we are beingshafted? For instance, here in the UK we have a government that is trying to force us into theEU without consent or referendum, and you’ll rarely see it in the news at all. We have a

government that will sanction illegal activity by our SAS in Iraq, having them dress up asSunnis or Shi’ites to inflame conflict. We have a government that is complicit in an illegal

invasion of Iraq, because after all they didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction, did they,so there was no probably cause to invade. And so, here we are. And of course we know we’renot there to spread democracy.

So my questions is, if you concede that our government is corrupt to some degree or other—

even if they’re one percent corrupt, who much corruption will you accept? Personally, I havea zero-tolerance policy on corruption. You see, I’m not anti-government, I’m just anti-corruptgovernment. Aren’t you?

My request is you start looking into this matter a little deeper. It’s very difficult to sort thewheat from the chaff on terms of what’s on youTube at the moment, but I’m sure if you’recommitted you’ll find the right sources, and you’ll find the information that will prove that

we heading toward a very dark place right now.

I would urge you to have conversations with your friends regarding the issues of the RFIDchip, the one world religion, the one world currency—what will the one world religion be?

Will it be Catholicism? Will it be Islam? What will the currency be? Who will control thatcurrency? Who will have a controlling interest in the central banks that are controlling this

currency? These are important questions, and they affect you. Whether you believe in thisconspiracy or not.

Keep an open mind. Ask questions. Engage in the conversation.

Thanks for listening.

HEO

9 February 2009© MMIX TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press

The Anti Terrorist First Broadcast Redux

Documents

Transcript of The Anti Terrorist First Broadcast Redux