The Affective and Learning Profiles of Students when Using an Intelligent Tutoring System for...
-
Upload
elfrieda-phelps -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of The Affective and Learning Profiles of Students when Using an Intelligent Tutoring System for...
The Affective and Learning The Affective and Learning Profiles of Students when Profiles of Students when
Using an Intelligent Tutoring Using an Intelligent Tutoring System for AlgebraSystem for Algebra
by: Maria Carminda V. Lagud Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo
Outline of the PresentationOutline of the Presentation
• Methods• Results and Discussion
• Conclusion
• Introduction
In the past• As a student solves a problem within the
ITS, the ITS examined whether the student’s actions were right or wrong or brought the student closer or farther away from the answer
• Offers appropriate help / guidance
• Just like a human tutor
Introduction
Introduction
However!
• Old ITSs only considered cognition, not emotion
“There is no cognitive mechanism without the affective element since affectivity motivates the intellectual activity.” - Piaget
• Learning is not only cognitive. It is also affective.
• Emergence of studies on affect and learning
Introduction
AffectAffect • pertains to a broad
class of mental processes, including feelings, emotions, moods, and temperament
• In our case:– Boredom
– Confusion
– Delight
– Frustration
– Flow
– Neutrality
– Surprise
Introduction
Introduction
affective profileaffective profile
- - description of a student based on the percentage of time he/she has displayed an emotion during a 40-min. observation session
Introduction
learning profilelearning profile
•number of correct items•highest difficulty level attempted•average time to solve an item•average number of steps taken to solve an item
Outline of the PresentationOutline of the Presentation
• Methods• Results and Discussion
• Conclusion
• Introduction
Methods
Research Setting and SubjectsResearch Setting and Subjects- 140 1st and 2nd year High School Students from 4 schools within Metro Manila and a school from Cavite
- average age of 13.5
Methods
Research InstrumentResearch Instrument- Aplusix
- log files- Data Collection Instrument
Methodsa screen shot of Aplusixa screen shot of Aplusix
Methods
Methodsa raw log filea raw log file
consolidation
Methods
Consolidated log fileConsolidated log fileMethods
consolidation analysis
Methods
Methods
Methods
analysisMethods
MethodsAffective Profile of Student ABCAffective Profile of Student ABC
Methods
Statistical Treatment
- Learning Profile – mean and standard deviation between the four categories
- groupings were also done based on terciles or by dividing the sample into three groups centered on the median
MethodsSample Tercile GroupSample Tercile Group
- The affective profiles of the terciles were compared with one another using One-Way ANOVA (SPSS)
Outline of the PresentationOutline of the Presentation
• Methods• Results and Discussion
• Conclusion
• Introduction
Results & Discussion
Correct Items SolvedCorrect Items Solved•Above Average Group experienced flow the most (F = 3.948; p = 0.022)
•Below Average Group experienced boredom the most (F=3.995; p=0.021) and confusion the most (F=5.163; p=0.007)
Results & Discussion
Highest Difficulty Level ReachedHighest Difficulty Level Reached•Above Average Group experienced flow the most (F = 5.994; p = 0.003)
•Below Average Group experienced boredom the most (F=5.495; p=0.005) and confusion the most (F=6.006; p=0.003)
Results & Discussion
Average Duration TimeAverage Duration Time•Above Average Group experienced confusion the least
•Below Average Group experienced confusion the most at (F=5.163; p=0.007)
Results & Discussion
Average Number of StepsAverage Number of Steps•Above Average and Average Group experienced flow more than the Below Average Group (F = 3.476; p = 0.034)
•Below Average Group experienced boredom the most (F=3.617; p=0.029) and confusion the most (F=4.082; p=0.019)
Results & DiscussionFLOWFLOW
• Highest scoring group• Group that tried highest levels• Group that took the least number of
steps
-is experienced more by people who are more motivated, has total and deep concentration, those who are willing to go further, reach higher levels of challenge and are achievers or experts (studies of Csikszentmihalyi, et al.)
highest occurrence
of flow
Results & Discussion CONFUSIONCONFUSION
• Lowest scoring group• Group that tried lowest levels• Group that answered items the
longest• Group that took the most number
of steps
- perceptual disorientation and lack of clear thinking (English & English) or a feeling of not knowing, when information is not present in memory (Hess 2003)
- positively related to optimum learning gains (Craig, et al)
highest occurrence
of confusion
Results & Discussion
highest occurrence
of boredom
BOREDOMBOREDOM• Lowest scoring group• Group that tried lowest
levels• Group that took the most
number of steps
-is felt when doing such uninteresting activities.
-association of boredom with subjective monotony (Perkins and Hill,1985)
Outline of the PresentationOutline of the Presentation
• Methods• Results and Discussion
• Conclusion
• Introduction
ConclusionIs this news?
• The novelty is the act of measuring
• Leads to ways of quantifying
• And if we continue to use automated tools, maybe these tools can also serve as early warning devices
Thank You!