The Admissibility of an Accused’s Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of...

download The Admissibility of an Accused’s Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): What Are the Constitutional Implications of this Type of Evidence?

of 40

Transcript of The Admissibility of an Accused’s Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of...

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    1/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice

    of Reading Material as Evidence Under

    Federal Rule of Evidence 404b!" #hat Arethe Constitutional $m%lications of this

    Ty%e of Evidence&

    Imagine this scenario: o! ha"e #een acc!se$ o% chi&$ mo&estation an$aggra"ate$ so$om'(1 As e"i$ence against 'o!) the *rosec!tion o%%ersco*ies o% se+!a&&',oriente$ maga-ines in 'o!r *ossession( 2.he maga-inesare not !n&a%!&3 the' are a$!&t maga-ines ith a$!&t mo$e&s) an$ nore%erences to or "is!a& images o% chi&$ren(4.he maga-ines are a&most nine

    'ears o&$ an$ store$ aa' in 'o!r #asement(

    o! ne"er shoe$ themaga-ines to 'o!r chi&$,acc!ser or !se$ them in an' a' to %!rther thea&&ege$ crime( In %act) there is no *roo% that 'o! act!a&&' rea$ themaga-ines(

    Ne"erthe&ess) the e"i$ence is a$mitte$ against 'o! to sho moti"egenera&&' an$ state o% min$ an$ &!st%!& $is*osition( 7 o!r co!nse& at

    tria& cha&&enges the a$missi#i&it' o% the e"i$ence) arg!ing that it isirre&e"ant) it is ina$missi#&e *ro*ensit' e"i$ence) an$ its *ro#ati"e "a&!e iss!#stantia&&' o!teighe$ #' its *re5!$icia& e%%ect( .hese arg!ments i&&ine"ita#&' %ai&( o!r co!nse& on a**ea& *resents the same arg!ments an$) ina$$ition) states that 'o!r Si+th Amen$ment an$ 6o!rteenth Amen$mentrights ha"e #een "io&ate$ #' the a$mission o% the maga-ines( O% co!rse)neither co!nse& at tria& nor on a**ea& mentions 'o!r 6irst Amen$mentrights or an' 6irst Amen$ment im*&ications o% the e"i$ence(8

    1 ( .he %act!a& scenario *resente$ is #ase$ !*on the %acts in Stamey v. Georgia) 380

    S(9(2$ 408 ;a( Ct( A**(

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    2/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    84 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348S!ch a scenario is i$entica& to the one %ace$ #' Ra' Haro&$ Stame'

    hen he as con"icte$ o% chi&$ mo&estation an$ the aggra"ate$ so$om' o%his eight,'ear,o&$ ste*$a!ghter(10His rit o% certiorari as s!#se!ent&'$enie$ #' the S!*reme Co!rt(11@' $en'ing certiorari) the S!*reme Co!rt

    misse$ an o**ort!nit' to r!&e on an iss!e o% &a that has tro!#&e$ circ!itan$ state co!rts a&iDe: the a$missi#i&it' o% an acc!se$Es rea$ing materia&( 12

    .his Note e+amines hether an in$i"i$!a&Es choice o% rea$ing materia& canan$ sho!&$ #e !se$ as e"i$ence against him at tria&) an$ i% so) to hat e+tent

    an$ in hat ca*acit'( Not s!r*rising&') cases ith simi&ar iss!es ha"e #eenr!&e$ !*on since Stamey) #!t !ncertaint' s!rro!n$ing the &a remains(

    .he 6irst Amen$ment grants in$i"i$!a&s the %ree$oms o% s*eech an$e+*ression(13.he right o% %ree$om o% s*eech an$ *ress inc&!$es not on&'the right to !tter or *rint #!t the right to rea$ ( ( ( ( 14.hese rights genera&&'tr!m* the e"i$entiar' nee$s o% the *rosec!tion( 6e$era& R!&e o% 9"i$ence

    6R9< 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    3/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 8III $isc!sses recent $ecisions that high&ight the s*&it among an$ ithincirc!it co!rts) an$ "ario!s state co!rt $ecisions( >art IB e+amines a&ternatea's o% #a&ancing the nee$ to a&&o the *rosec!tion an o**ort!nit' to

    *resent their case hi&e sti&& *rotecting the constit!tiona& rights o% the

    acc!se$( >art IB a&so $isc!sses the hea"' #!r$en !*on *rosec!tors an$their nee$ %or this *oer%!& e"i$ence ith character re"ea&ing !a&ities(A$$itiona&&') >art IB high&ights the mistaDes o% tria& 5!$ges an$ ho their%ai&!res at tria& res!&t in rec!rring $i&emmas( 6ina&&') >art IB $isc!sses hoco!nse& o% the acc!se$ contin!o!s&' %ai& to #ring %orar$ constit!tiona&cha&&enges o% e"i$entiar' !se( A&ternate a's to re%rain %rom an 6R9404#< ana&'sis are $isc!sse$ so as to a&&o tria& 5!$ges to a"oi$ thisconstit!tiona& !agmire(

    I( IN.ROG=C.ION

    .he right to rea$) tho!gh not e+*&icit&' state$ in the Constit!tion) is a*rotecte$ %orm o% %ree s*eech an$ is th!s grante$ *rotection !n$er the 6irst

    Amen$ment(18

    As !stice @&acD state$ inMartin v. City o% Str&t'er()theright o% %ree$om o% s*eech an$ *ress has #roa$ sco*e ( ( ( ( .his %ree$omem#races the right to $istri#!te &iterat!re an$ necessari&' *rotects the right

    to recei"e it(20 Hoe"er) &iDe a&& constit!tiona& rights) the 6irstAmen$ment rights are not a#so&!te(21.he 6irst Amen$ment) moreo"er)$oes not *rohi#it the e"i$entiar' !se o% s*eech to esta#&ish e&ements o% acrime or to *ro"e moti"e or intent(22

    .he rea$ing materia& o% an acc!se$ sho!&$ ne"er #e com)*ete*yo%% &imits

    as e"i$ence in a crimina& *rocee$ing( In some cases) an in$i"i$!a&Es choiceo% rea$ing materia& is re&e"ant an$ *ro#ati"e(23 Fhat an in$i"i$!a& rea$sgenera&&' sa's something a#o!t his interests) i% not his character( Hoe"er)6R9 404a< *rohi#its the !se o% a *ersonEs character or a trait o% character

    to *ro"e action in con%ormit' thereith on a *artic!&ar occasion(

    24

    .ro!#&esome iss!es arise hen *rosec!tors seeD to a$mit an acc!se$Esrea$ing materia& as e"i$ence *!rs!ant to 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    4/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    8 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348character e"i$ence r!&e(2 6R9 404#< a&&os e"i$ence o% other crimes)rongs) or acts %or *!r*oses o% shoing *roo% o% moti"e) o**ort!nit')intent) *re*aration) *&an) Dno&e$ge) i$entit') or a#sence o% mistaDe( 2Inman' 5!ris$ictions) it is the most %re!ent&' &itigate$ iss!e an$ ma' #e the

    most common gro!n$ %or re"ersa& in crimina& cases(

    27

    Congressiona&intent c&ear&' in$icates that 6R9 404#< as create$ as an inc&!si"e r!&e o%e"i$ence(2 It a&&os *rosec!tors an o**ort!nit' to o%%er e"i$ence thato!&$ otherise not #e a$missi#&e( >rosec!tors %re!ent&' re&' !*on this

    a&&,encom*assing r!&e(28

    >rosec!tors carr' the hea"' #!r$en o% esta#&ishing *roo% #e'on$ areasona#&e $o!#t as to each e&ement o% the crime *roscri#e$ #' thestat!te(30 In se"era& sit!ations here *rosec!tors &acD e"i$ence to *ro"es!ch e&ements as moti"e or intent) the' i&& seeD to esta#&ish those e&ements#' $igging into the &i#raries) com*!ters) or *ersona& $igita& assistants

    >GA< o% the acc!se$ to %in$ an' sort o% connection or simi&arit' to thea&&ege$ crime(31O%tentimes) *rosec!tors i&& $isco"er rea$ing materia& iththemes resem#&ing the crime committe$(32Ges*ite the %act that the rea$ingmateria& is &a%!& an$ constit!tiona&&' *rotecte$) the *rosec!tion i&& seeDto ha"e s!ch e"i$ence a$mitte$( .he *rosec!tionEs goa& is to &inD the$e%en$ant to the crime thro!gh the rea$ing materia&( .he' are in$irect&'te&&ing the 5!r' that the $e%en$ant ha$ this interest an$ #eca!se o% thisinterest) it is more &iDe&' the $e%en$ant committe$ the crime( Hence) the

    *rosec!torEs nee$ %or e"i$ence con%&icts ith the 6irst Amen$ment an$ the*ri"ac' rights o% the $e%en$ant(33 Fitho!t %!rther g!i$ance %rom theS!*reme Co!rt) tria& co!rt 5!$ges ha"e str!gg&e$ to #a&ance the interests o%the acc!se$ hi&e sti&& gi"ing the *rosec!tion a chance to *resent its case

    2 ( 69G( R( 9BIG( 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    5/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 87e%%ecti"e&'(34

    .he &acD o% c&arit' regar$ing the iss!e has &e$ to a #roa$ s*ectr!m o%ho&$ings an$ o!tcomes( .he !estion remains: =n$er hich circ!mstancesan$ to hat e+tent) can an in$i"i$!a&Es rea$ing materia& #e !se$ as

    e"i$ence against that *erson in a co!rt o% &a

    II( .H969G9RALR=L9SO69BIG9NC9ANGCOM>9.IN;CONS.I.=.IONALIN.9R9S.S

    A( 6R9 401) 404#resent a Gi%%ic!&t O#stac&e %or anAcc!se$ to O"ercome

    @e%ore o%%ering an' e"i$ence) the *rosec!tion m!st esta#&ish itsre&e"ance(3Re&e"ant e"i$enceEis e"i$ence that has an' ten$enc' tomaDe the e+istence o% an' %act ( ( ( more *ro#a#&e ( ( ( than it o!&$ #eitho!t the e"i$ence(3 A&& re&e"ant e"i$ence is a$missi#&e) !n&ess

    *rohi#ite$ #' the Constit!tion o% the =nite$ States) an Act o% Congress) orother r!&e *rescri#e$ #' the S!*reme Co!rt *!rs!ant to stat!tor'a!thorit'(37 .he thresho&$ stan$ar$ to meet the re&e"anc' re!irement is&o there%ore) most materia& o%%ere$ #' the *rosec!tion i&& ha"e notro!#&e meeting the re&e"anc' re!irement(

    Rea$ing materia& in the *ossession o% the acc!se$ is a&most certain&'re&e"ant( .he %act that a man acc!se$ o% chi&$ mo&estation *ossesses chi&$

    *ornogra*h' o!&$ maDe the *ro#a#i&it' that he committe$ the crime more&iDe&' than it o!&$ #e itho!t s!ch e"i$ence( Co!rts !se a reasona#&enessstan$ar$ to $etermine re&e"ance: hether a reasona#&e man might ha"e hisassessment o% *ro#a#i&ities o% a materia& *ro*osition change$ #' a *iece o%e"i$ence so!ght to #e a$mitte$(3=n$er this stan$ar$) the %act that a man

    rea$s a *ornogra*hic maga-ine entit&e$ Over 1!o!&$ #e re&e"ant to a casein hich he is acc!se$ o% ra*ing an eight',%i"e,'ear,o&$ oman) %or it has agreater ten$enc' to s!**ort the !&timate %act that he committe$ the crimethan o!&$ #e the case itho!t this in%ormation(38

    One e+ce*tion to the re&e"anc' re!irement is 6R9 404a

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    6/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    8 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348character rather than his g!i&t(41.he e+ce*tion to the character e"i$encer!&e is 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    7/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 88tria& 5!$ge s!ccess%!&&' a"oi$e$ an 6R9 403,#ase$ a**ea&48#' e+c&!$ing13 o% the 140 *ornogra*hic stories %o!n$ on the $e%en$antEs >GA #eca!sethe' ere re$!n$ant) in%&ammator') an$ !n$!&' *re5!$icia&(0

    Another #a&ancing metho$ !se$ #' tria& 5!$ges is to gi"e a &imiting

    instr!ction(

    1

    .he 5!$ge instr!cts the 5!r' an$ em*hasi-es that the e"i$encecan on&' #e !se$ %or noncharacter *!r*oses:

    o! ma' taDe this Din$ o% e"i$ence on the !estion o% hether the

    $e%en$ant act!a&&' *ossesse$ the intent( ( ( ( So) %or those %o!r *!r*oses)

    on&') the ;o"ernment is o%%ering to sho that the $e%en$ant *ossesse$

    this &iterat!re: intent) metho$) *re*aration) an$ Dno&e$ge( An$ 'o!

    ma' on&' taDe it %or that *!r*ose( ( ( ( o! m!st not a&&o this Din$ o%

    e"i$ence to #ias 'o!) genera&&') against the $e%en$ant on the !&timate

    !estion o% g!i&t or innocence( o! m!st not $o that(2

    !$ges are aare) hoe"er) o% the "er' rea& *ossi#i&it' that the 5!r' i&&$ra im*ermissi#&e character in%erences %rom the rea$ing materia& o% theacc!se$ an$ $etermine the g!i&t o% the acc!se$ #ase$ on his se&ection o%

    rea$ing materia&(3

    In or$er %or a $e%en$ant to cha&&enge the tria& 5!$geEs 6R9 403 r!&ing ona**ea& there m!st #e an a#!se o% $iscretion(4A co!rt o% a**ea& re"ies thetria& co!rtEs r!&ings on o#5ections #ase$ on !n$!e *re5!$ice an$ &acD o%re&e"ance !n$er the same a#!se o% $iscretion stan$ar$( In the e"ent thatthe co!rt %in$s an a#!se o% $iscretion) the $e%en$ant m!st sti&& o"ercome theharm&ess,error test hich states) an' error) $e%ect) irreg!&arit' or "ariancethat $oes not a%%ect s!#stantia& rights m!st #e $isregar$e$( .here is)hoe"er) a $e#ate on hether a "io&ation o% a constit!tiona& right sho!&$e"er #e consi$ere$ a harm&ess error( As !stice Ste"ens state$ in Ro(e v.C*ar2) "io&ations o% certain constit!tiona& rights are not) an$ sho!&$ not#e) s!#5ect to harm&ess,error ana&'sis #eca!se those rights *rotect im*ortant

    48 . Id.at 1084 C!rtin $i$ not s*eci%ica&&' an$ $istinct&' maDe a R!&e 403 arg!ment

    in his o*ening #rie%(

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    8/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    100 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348"a&!es that are !nre&ate$ to the tr!th,seeDing %!nction o% the tria&(7

    Ne"erthe&ess) the net res!&t o% the "ario!s r!&es is that rea$ing materia& iseasi&' a$mitte$ at tria& an$ $i%%ic!&t to o"ercome on a**ea&(

    @( 6R9 404#< Contains Am#ig!o!s .ermino&og' Fhich) Fitho!t6!rther Instr!ction) Can Lea$ to an O"er,Inc&!sion o% 9"i$ence

    1( Other crimes) rongs) or acts o% the acc!se$: Goes*ossession o% rea$ing materia& %it into one o% thesecategories

    6R9 404#< a&&os a *rosec!tor to o%%er e"i$ence o% other crimes)rongs) or acts o% the acc!se$(A crime is !n$erstoo$ to #e an act thatthe &a maDes *!nisha#&e the #reach o% a &ega& $!t' treate$ as the s!#5ectmatter o% a crimina& *rocee$ing(8 In the context of FRE 404(b), acrime is less ambiguous than a wrong or act. !re"ious

    con"iction for unlawful im!ortation of heroin woul# be a#missible in a

    subse$uent case where the #efen#ant is accuse# of smugglingmetham!hetamine #es!ite the fact that the two #rugs are #ifferent.

    0

    .he other %orms o% 6R9 404#< e"i$ence) rongs an$ acts) are moream#ig!o!s( Are the rongs $escri#e$ in the R!&e inten$e$ to im*&' on&'&ega& in%ractions short o% crimina& "io&ations) or $o rongs encom*asssocia& an$ mora& shortcomings .here are acts hich ma' #e $eeme$re*rehensi#&e or mora&&' re*!gnant #' the norms o% societ') s!ch as

    rea$ing *ornogra*hic stories or atten$ing a J! J&!+ J&an ra&&') #!t i% the'are not i&&ega&) sho!&$ the' #e consi$ere$ a rong 6!rthermore) ho$etermines hat a rong is >res!ma#&') the tria& 5!$ge o!&$ #eres*onsi#&e %or $etermining hat constit!tes an 6R9 404#< rong(1

    .his *&aces the 5!$ge in a *osition to *ass socia& an$ mora& 5!$gment on the

    acc!se$Es #eha"ior an$ actions( Is rea$ing consi$ere$ a rong) or $oesthe characteri-ation o% rea$ing as a rong $e*en$ !*on the s!#5ectmatter #eing rea$ In short) it is !nc&ear hat Congress meant hen the'inc&!$e$ rongs as a$missi#&e 404#< e"i$ence(

    Fhat constit!tes an act Fhi&e the acts o% thinDing) &earning) rea$ing)or %antasi-ing a#o!t a crime are not *!nisha#&e) other actions short o% thecom*&ete$ crime) s!ch as cons*irac') are *!nisha#&e( .he !estion %or theco!rt #ecomes: at hat *oint $o the menta& *rocesses mani%est into an actas $e%ine$ #' 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    9/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 1016!rthermore) in %orm!&ating 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    10/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    102 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:3482( Rea$ing materia& !se$ to esta#&ish intent) moti"e) an$ other

    noncharacter *!r*oses are !n%air&' *re5!$icia& to the acc!se$

    Fhi&e some noncharacter !ses o% e"i$ence are sim*&e to !n$erstan$)

    others are more am#ig!o!s( >ro"ing Dno&e$ge is a %air&' straight%orar$

    noncharacter !se o% e"i$ence( .he !se o% a $e%en$antEs rea$ing materia& tosho Dno&e$ge is &ogica& #eca!se a s!#stantia& amo!nt o% Dno&e$ge isac!ire$ thro!gh rea$ing( I% the $e%en$ant a&&eges a &acD o% Dno&e$ge) thea$missi#i&it' o% rea$ing materia& to sho that the $e%en$ant *ossesse$ there!isite Dno&e$ge is #oth re&e"ant an$ *ro#ati"e(70@ooDs or maga-ineshich are instr!cti"e in nat!re o!&$ %a&& into this categor') an$ the*rosec!tion o!&$ sti&& #e &e%t ith the #!r$en o% shoing that the$e%en$ant co!&$ rea$ an$ $i$ rea$ the materia&s(71

    Fhen rea$ing materia& is !se$ to sho Dno&e$ge) there is &itt&e) i% an')in%ringement on the $e%en$antEs 6irst Amen$ment rights(72.he *rosec!tionis not te&&ing a 5!r' that #eca!se the $e%en$ant rea$s a *artic!&ar maga-ine)he m!st ha"e acte$ in con%ormit' thereith) or that his act o% rea$ing the

    maga-ine has com*e&&e$ him to $o s!ch an act( .he *rosec!tion is sim*&'intro$!cing e"i$ence to sho that the $e%en$ant ha$ s!%%icient Dno&e$geto commit the crime( .he $e%en$ant o!&$ not #e !n%air&' *re5!$ice$ #'the a$mission o% rea$ing materia& that *ro"i$e$ the $e%en$ant ithDno&e$ge) #eca!se there is a &o risD that a 5!r' o!&$ $raim*ermissi#&e character in%erences an$ con"ict him #ase$ on hat hechooses to rea$(73

    In +nited State( v. Roger() the $e%en$ant as con"icte$ o% *ossessing a%irearm a si&encer< not registere$ to him( 74.he $e%en$ant a&&ege$ a &acDo% Dno&e$ge o% the $e"iceEs %!nction(7As e"i$ence against the $e%en$ant)the co!rt a$mitte$ a co*' o% the #ooD) T'e Anarc'i(t0( Coo2#oo2(7 .he#ooD ga"e $etai&e$ instr!ctions on ho to #!i&$ a si&encer: he ha$ #!i&t the

    si&encer accor$ing to the Coo2#oo20(*&an(77

    .he co!rt he&$) there is no70 . E.g.) =nite$ States "( Mo!nt) 8 6(2$ 12) 22 1st Cir( 1880< ho&$ing that

    e"i$ence o% historica& $oc!ments %o!n$ in $e%en$antEs resi$ence ith i$enti%'ing marDs

    remo"e$ ere a$missi#&e to *ro"e $e%en$antEs Dno&e$ge that simi&ar $oc!ments ere

    sto&en

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    11/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 103*ro#&em) !n$er either the &a o% e"i$ence or the 6irst Amen$ment) in*resenting to the 5!r' ritten materia& in the $e%en$antEs *ossession thatshos ho to commit the crime) %or this maDes it more &iDe&' that the

    $e%en$ant rather than someone e&se as c!&*a#&e(7 In cases here

    Dno&e$ge is the #asis %or intro$!cing rea$ing materia&) the *rosec!tion isnot !sing the e"i$ence in or$er to *ro"e g!i&t or an' e&ement o% the crime(Rather) the *rosec!tion is !sing the materia& strict&' to re#!t the$e%en$antEs &acD,o%,Dno&e$ge $e%ense(

    .he more *ro#&ematic !se o% rea$ing materia& !n$er 6R9 404#< is henthe *!r*ose is to sho intent or moti"e( Intent is $e%ine$ as the state o%min$ accom*an'ing an act ( ( ( ( Fhi&e moti"e is the in$!cement to $osome act) intent is the menta& reso&!tion or $etermination to $o it( Fhen theintent to $o an act that "io&ates the &a e+ists) the moti"e #ecomesimmateria&(78 et) ho can rea$ing a #ooD or a maga-ine sho anin$i"i$!a&Es menta& state or a reso&"e to act !*on a state o% min$ Anin$i"i$!a& ma' rea$ %or %antas') c!riosit') entertainment) or Dno&e$ge(.he 5!r' taDes a giant &ea* in ass!ming that #eca!se an in$i"i$!a& rea$s

    certain materia&) he reso&"es to act in a manner consistent ith the materia&(Not on&' is there a threat o% im*ermissi#&e character in%erences) #!t there isa #roa$er 6irst Amen$ment im*&ication( .he 6irst Amen$ment seeDs to*rotect oneEs *ri"ac' an$ %ree$om o% e+*ression) #!t a&so to %oster thee+change o% i$eas %or the greater goo$ o% the comm!nit'( 0 .he 6irstAmen$ment is essentia& %or comm!nication) e$!cation) an$ creati"ethinDing(

    Rea$ing materia& as !se$ to sho intent in eo)*e v. Sara#i(1 InSara#i) an !n*!#&ishe$ case) the $e%en$ant) an ice cream tr!cD oner) asacc!se$ o% committing &e$ or &asci"io!s acts !*on a chi&$ !n$er the age o%%o!rteen(2.he tria& co!rt a$mitte$ into e"i$ence co*ies o% a *ornogra*hicmaga-ine entit&e$ 5o&ng Star() hich containe$ se+!a&&' e+*&icit

    *hotogra*hs o% n!$e 'o!ng omen $escri#e$ as teenagers(3.o esta#&ishthe crime charge$) the *rosec!tor ha$ to *ro"e that sic $e%en$ant

    to!che$ his acc!ser ith the intent to aro!se) a**ea& to or grati%' &!st)*assion) or se+!a& $esire o% the $e%en$ant(4.he Co!rt !&timate&' he&$ thatthe 5!r' co!&$ in%er %rom the maga-ine an$ the *hotogra*hs that $e%en$antha$ a *r!rient interest in a$o&escent gir&s an$ that he inten$e$ to act on that

    7 . Id.at 101(78 ( @LACJESLAFGIC.IONAR2 th e$( 2004

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    12/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    104 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348interest(An e+cessi"e amo!nt o% a *artic!&ar t'*e o% rea$ing materia&ma' esta#&ish that the rea$er ha$ a *artic!&ar interest) #!t it is $i%%ic!&t tosee ho a 5!$ge or a 5!r' can conc&!$e that the $e%en$ant inten$e$ to acton that interestitho!t %!rther e"i$ence( I% %!rther e"i$ence is a"ai&a#&e)

    the *rosec!tion o!&$ not nee$ to intro$!ce the rea$ing materia&(.he iss!e o% intent #ecomes *er*&e+ing hen co!rts #egin to $etermine

    a$missi#i&it' #ase$ !*on the $istinction #eteen s*eci%ic intent an$ genera&intent(7 .he terms s*eci%ic intent an$ genera& intent ha"e &ongcon%o!n$e$ co!rts an$ commentators:

    .he main $istinction #eteen s*eci%ic an$ genera& intent is the e&ement

    o% #a$ or e"i& *!r*ose hich is re!ire$ %or the %ormer( A *erson ho

    Dnoing&' commits an act hich the &a maDes a crime ma' #e sai$ to

    ha"e genera& intent) hi&e the *erson ho commits the same act ith

    #a$ *!r*ose either to $iso#e' or $isregar$ the &a ma' #e sai$ to ha"e

    s*eci%ic intent(8

    Fhi&e an attem*t to %!rther $isting!ish the to is #e'on$ the sco*e o% this

    Note) s*eci%ic intent crimes re!ire the *rosec!tor to carr' a greater #!r$eno% *roo% to sho the *artic!&ar mens rea(80.his greater #!r$en o% *roo%o%ten com*e&s *rosec!tors to reach %or e"i$ence( Co!rts ha"e shon agreater inc&ination to a&&o rea$ing materia& into e"i$ence !n$er 6R9

    404#< to *ro"e intent hen the "io&ate$ stat!te in"o&"es s*eci%ic intent( 81

    In s!ch cases) 5!$ges are *&acing the nee$s o% the *rosec!tion a#o"e the*rotections o% the $e%en$ant(

    .he other t'*es o% noncharacter !ses) inc&!$ing o**ort!nit') *re*aration)*&an) i$entit') an$ a#sence o% mistaDe) are $i%%ic!&t to *ro"e thro!gh

    rea$ing materia& an$ genera&&' are not the s!#5ect o% 6R9 404#< casesin"o&"ing the a$missi#i&it' o% rea$ing materia&( Hoe"er) co!rts ha"ea&&oe$ rea$ing materia& into e"i$ence %or other noncharacter !ses not

    state$ in 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    13/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 10C( S*ecia& >rotections Sho!&$ @e ;rante$ Fhen Constit!tiona&&'

    >rotecte$ Rea$ing Materia& is =se$ as 9"i$ence Against theAcc!se$

    =n&iDe other act(!se$ %or noncharacter *!r*oses !n$er 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    14/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    10 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348III( R9C9N.G9CISIONSHI;HLI;H..H9S>[email protected];ANGFI.HIN

    [email protected];MA.9RIALAS9BIG9NC9

    A( Contro"ersia& Ninth Circ!it Gecisions in S'ymanovit7)A**en) an$C&rtinI&&!strate the =ncertaint' S!rro!n$ing the A$missi#i&it'o% the Acc!se$Es Rea$ing Materia& as 9"i$ence Against Him

    .he Ninth Circ!it a$$resse$ the a$missi#i&it' o% rea$ing materia&$irect&' in G&am v. S'ymanovit7(100Ges*ite the co!rtEs goo$ %aith e%%ort to*rotect the acc!se$Es 6irst Amen$ment rights an$ &imit the a$missi#i&it' o%rea$ing materia& e"i$ence !n$er 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    15/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 107!n$er the se+!a& contact stat!te) is o#5ecti"e rather than s!#5ecti"e( In short)it is the character o% the to!ching that is at iss!e) not the *!r*ose o% theintentiona& to!cher(111@' taDing intent o!t o% the e!ation) the *rosec!tion

    as &e%t itho!t a noncharacter e"i$entiar' !se a$missi#&e !n$er 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    16/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    10 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348rights an$ *ri"ac' concerns) #!t %ai&s to e+*&icit&' state the 6irstAmen$ment as a reason %or *re"enting the intro$!ction o% rea$ing materia&(>erha*s this is #eca!se s!ch a constit!tiona& cha&&enge as ne"er raise$ #'Sh'mano"it-Es $e%ense co!nse&) an$ as s!ch) as $eeme$ ai"e$( As a

    res!&t o% the $e%ense co!nse&Es omission) the co!rt as not a#&e to $irect&'a$$ress the 6irst Amen$ment im*&ications o% this e"i$entiar' !sage(11

    .he co!rt in S'ymanovit7 $isc!sse$ rea$ing as a #a$ act !n$er the 6R9:hi&e certain t'*es o% con$!ct genera&&' con$emne$ #' societ' ma'constit!te #a$ acts) *ossession o% &a%!& rea$ing materia& is sim*&' not thet'*e o% con$!ct contem*&ate$ #' R!&e 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    17/40

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    18/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    110 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348crime(138

    Rea$ing the ho&$ings o% S'ymanovit7140 an$A**en141 together) it o!&$#e &ogica& to conc&!$e that the a$missi#i&it' o% the acc!se$Es choice o%rea$ing materia& !n$er 6R9 404#< hinges on hether the stat!te "io&ate$

    as a s*eci%ic intent or a genera& intent crime( .his $istinction as not the%oca& *oint the S'ymanovit7 co!rt inten$e$ to re&' !*on(142 .he NinthCirc!itEs !se o% the s*eci%ic intent an$ genera& intent $istinction as acon"enient a' o% Dee*ing rea$ing materia& aa' %rom the 5!r' #eca!se o%6irst Amen$ment *ri"ac' concerns an$ the *ossi#i&it' o% !n%air characterin%erences(143Ne"erthe&ess) the A**enco!rt re&ie$ !*on the s*eci%ic intentan$ genera& intent $istinction to $etermine a$missi#i&it' !n$er 6R9404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    19/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 111there(11 6ina&&') on the $a' o% the *ro*ose$ meeting) he arri"e$ at the$esignate$ meeting area #!t $i$ not comm!nicate ith Christ'( 12 Fhi&e&ea"ing the casino) he as $etaine$ #' &a en%orcement o%%icers)

    !estione$) searche$) an$ !&timate&' arreste$(13.he *o&ice sei-e$ his >GA

    an$ &a*to* com*!ter(

    14

    .he >GA containe$ o"er 140 stories a#o!t a$!&tsha"ing se+ ith chi&$ren(1

    .he ;o"ernment o%%ere$ "ario!s stories %o!n$ on the >GA to shointent) Dno&e$ge) *re*aration or mo$!s o*eran$i(1 .he $e%en$ant

    o#5ecte$ to the a$missi#i&it' o% s!ch e"i$ence #' stating that the storiesere high&' *re5!$icia& an$ ere #eing a$mitte$ to sho *ro*ensit'( 17

    .he $e%en$ant $i$ not mention the 6irst Amen$ment hen cha&&enging thea$missi#i&it' o% the stories(1

    .he ;o"ernment arg!e$ that the &ang!age !se$ in C!rtinEs instantmessaging con"ersations an$ e,mai&s %eat!re$ simi&ar themes as to the

    stories %o!n$ on the >GA(186or instance) the stor' Me&anieEs @!s' Ga'$isc!sse$ ora& se+ an$ a chi&$ mast!r#ating #oth ere $isc!sse$ #' C!rtinin the e&ectronic comm!nications(10Another stor') Missing @ig @rother)$isc!sse$ ho the a$!&t in the stor' $i$ not ant to h!rt the chi&$ $!ringse+) something C!rtin a&so ta&De$ a#o!t in his comm!nications( 11@eca!seo% the simi&arities in the &ang!age o% the stories an$ the comm!nications)the ;o"ernment arg!e$ that the stories ere ine+trica#&' intertine$ith the a&&ege$ crime an$ th!s) o!tsi$e the *arameters o% 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    20/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    112 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348an$ th!s) s!#5ect to an 6R9 404#< ana&'sis(1

    1( .he C&rtinco!rt %oc!se$ on *ossession o% rea$ing materia& as

    an act

    .he C&rtinco!rtEs %oc!s as the c&assi%ication o% rea$ing materia& as anact( .he C&rtin co!rt conc&!$e$ that the maga-ine artic&es %ai&e$ toconstit!te an 6R9 404#< #a$ act(17 .he %o!r,*art test esta#&ishe$ #'

    +nited State( v. S)i**one) hich as !se$ in C&rtin to $eterminea$missi#i&it' !n$er 6R9 404#< states:

    1 there m!st #e s!%%icient e"i$ence to s!**ort the 5!r'Es %in$ing that

    the $e%en$ant committe$ the other crime( ( ( ( 2 the other crime m!st

    not #e too remote in time( ( ( ( 3 hen a *rior act is a$mitte$ to

    *ro"e intent ( ( ( the *rior act m!st #e simi&ar( ( ( ( an$ 4 the *rior act

    m!st #e intro$!ce$ in or$er to *ro"e a materia& e&ement o% the case(1

    .he co!rt %o!n$ the thir$ criterion) the simi&arit' o% the acts) to #e the

    $is*ositi"e iss!e(

    18

    Fe he&$ in S'ymanovit7 that *ossession o% &a%!&rea$ing materia& as not simi&ar to act!a& crimina& con$!ct) th!s %ai&ing thethir$ criterion o% the S)i**onetest(170In C&rtin) the go"ernment so!ghtto intro$!ce *ossession o% materia& that $escri#es one t'*e o% crimina&con$!ct) name&' incest ith minors) to *ro"e intent to commit another t'*eo% crimina& con$!ct) name&' crossing state #or$ers to ha"e se+ ith aminor(171LiDe the maga-ine artic&es in S'ymanovit7) the stories $isco"ere$on the $e%en$antEs >GA o!&$ ha"e *res!ma#&' %ai&e$ the S)i**onetest an$there%ore #een ina$missi#&e(172

    Fhen the act in !estion is more than mere *ossession o% rea$ingmateria&) the $i%%ic!&ties in a**&'ing the %o!r,*art S)i**one test #ecomea**arent( 6rom a &ogica& stan$*oint) mere *ossession o% s!ch materia&o!&$ #e !se&ess itho!t *roo% that the $e%en$ant rea$ it( It is the rea$ingthat esta#&ishes or rein%orces the $e%en$antEs men( rea( I% mere *ossession$oes constit!te an act !n$er 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    21/40

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    22/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    114 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348the act!a& crimina& con$!ct(12A #asic C&rtininter*retation o% the thir$S)i**one criterion o!&$ &ea$ to an o"er&' #roa$ e+c&!sion o% e"i$ence(Mere *ossession o% rea$ing materia& is not crimina& con$!ct an$ can ne"er#e e!ate$ ith crimina& con$!ct( .h!s) a&& rea$ing materia& s!#5ect to an

    6R9 404#< ana&'sis o!&$ #e e+c&!$e$( !$ge .rott note$ in his $issentingo*inion in C&rtin) the #rea$th o% s!ch a $istinction #' stating that: hisco&&eag!es ha"e e%%ecti"e&' ma$e re&e"ant &iterat!re categorica&&' o%%,&imitsas a so!rce o% e"i$ence(13

    I% the co!rt ha$ not $isting!ishe$ #eteen the act o% *ossessing materia&an$ the act o% committing the crime) #!t instea$ ha$ %oc!se$ on thecontents o% the rea$ing materia&) an' simi&arit' %o!n$ #eteen the rea$ingmateria& an$ the a&&ege$ crimina& con$!ct co!&$ *otentia&&' #e a$mitte$(.his o!&$ &ea$ to an o"er,inc&!sion o% e"i$ence( 14 In C&rtin) the co!rt%!rther $isting!ishe$ the acts an$ a"oi$e$ the risD o% o"er,inc&!sion #'

    strict&' inter*reting the simi&arit' o% the crime committe$ an$ the contentso% the artic&es(1 S!ch a narro inter*retation o% simi&arit' seemscontrar' to the &as o% re&e"anc'( .he artic&es in the $e%en$antEs *ossessionin"o&"e$ incest!o!s se+ ith minors(1 .he a&&ege$ crime in"o&"e$crossing state #or$ers ith the s*eci%ic intent to engage in se+!a& con$!ctith minors(17.he co!rt $isregar$s the simi&arit' #eteen the crime an$the content o% the artic&es(

    In short) the C&rtinco!rt incorrect&' states that there is no simi&arit'#eteen the contents o% the stories an$ the crime committe$( .he co!rt$oes) hoe"er) correct&' $isting!ish the act o% *ossessing s!ch materia& an$the act o% committing the crime( .hat is not to sa') o% co!rse) that a&&rea$ing materia& sho!&$ %ai& the simi&arit' test !n$er S)i**one an$s!#se!ent&' #e !na"ai&a#&e to the *rosec!tion( Rather) the S)i**one testan$ other simi&ar 6R9 404#< a$missi#i&it' tests m!st #e a&tere$ hen

    $ea&ing ith the *ossession o% rea$ing materia&a *assi"e)constit!tiona&&',*rotecte$ act(

    2( C&rtino"er&ooDs the s*eci%ic intent an$ genera& intent

    $istinction

    Fhi&e the S'ymanovit7co!rt as sDe*tica& as to hether *ossession o%rea$ing materia& can constit!te a #a$ act) that as not its #asis %or

    $etermining ina$missi#i&it'(1 Ina$missi#i&it' in S'ymanovit7 as$etermine$ #' the intent re!ire$ in the *rescri#e$ stat!te) genera& intent or

    12 ( =nite$ States "( C!rtin) 443 6(3$ 104) 1081 8th Cir( 200< ma5orit' o*inion

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    23/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 11s*eci%ic intent(18Intent as the materia& e&ement o% the o%%ense) the %o!rthcriterion in the S)i**one test( !$ge .rottEs $issenting o*inion in C&rtincorrect&' states the #asis %or e+c&!$ing the e"i$ence in S'ymanovit7:

    .he ma5orit'Es o"er,genera&i-ation #est i&&!strates the ma5orit'Es

    %ai&!re to a**reciate the %act that the o%%ense $escri#e$ inS'ymanovit7 as nota s*eci%ic intent crime( .h!s) #eca!se s*eci%ic

    intent as not an iss!e) rea$ing materia& a$mitte$ to sho intent o!&$

    ne"er #e re&e"ant( ( ( ( Fhere s*eci%ic intent is at iss!e) rea$ing

    materia& can #e re&e"ant(180

    .he A**en co!rtEs contin!e$ re&iance !*on this $istinction an$ the&ang!age o% S'ymanovit7 s!ggests that !$ge .rottEs inter*retation o%S'ymanovit7 is acc!rate(181 .he ma5orit' in C&rtin) hoe"er) inter*rete$S'ymanovit7 $i%%erent&'(182.he ma5orit' $i$ not re&' !*on the s*eci%icintent an$ genera& intent $istinction: e"en i% S'ymanovit7in"o&"es s&ight&'$i%%erent %acts) its &ega& r!&e $oes not $isting!ish #eteen s*eci%ic intentcrimes an$ other crimes(183

    .he ma5orit' in C&rtina&so e+c&!$e$ the stories %rom e"i$ence %or the*rosec!tionEs re#!tta& o% the $e%en$antEs $e%ense(184 Ge%ense co!nse& %orC!rtin arg!e$ that C!rtin inten$e$ to act o!t an incest!o!s se+!a&%antas' ith Christ') #!t that he e+*ecte$ her to #e an a$!&t ho o!&$*reten$ to #e his innocent !ns*oi&e$ $a!ghter( A&tho!gh he ca&&e$ hisse+!a& %antas' $a$$' $a!ghter)E he $enie$ that the $a!ghterE o!&$ #e aminor(18 !$ge .rott acDno&e$ge$ that) i% tr!e) this intent arg!ment

    o!&$ $e%eat the *rosec!tionEs case(18 Ne"erthe&ess) this arg!mentarrants a greater *rosec!toria& nee$ %or the e"i$ence: o#scene &iterat!reten$ing itho!t am#ig!it' to *ro"e that the o#5ect o% his incest %antas' asa chi&$) not an a$!&t(187

    Fhen rea$ing materia& is #eing !se$ #' the *rosec!tion to re#!t a &acD

    o% intent $e%ense) as o**ose$ to the *rosec!tionEs case,in,chie%) the$'namics o% a$missi#i&it' change(18 In +nited State( v. Vie%'a&() the$e%en$ant) ho ha$ #een con"icte$ o% cons*irac' an$ !se o% a te&e*hone totransmit a #om# threat) cha&&enge$ the a$missi#i&it' o% &iterat!re es*o!sing

    18 . Id.180 . C&rtin)4436(3$ at 1104 n( ma5orit' o*inion

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    24/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    11 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348hate an$ other Na-i *ro*agan$a(188

    Fhen the $e%en$ant o%%ers &acD o% intent as a $e%ense) e"en tho!gh the

    go"ernment $oes not ha"e to *ro"e s!#5ecti"e intent as an e&ement o%

    the o%%ense) the circ!mstances s!rro!n$ing the maDing o% the ca&&s

    #ecome re&e"ant( .he e"i$ence o%%ere$ c&ear&' as *ro#ati"e o% the$e%en$antEs state o% min$ an$ ten$s to co!nter his a&&egation o% #enign

    *!r*ose(200

    3( On an en #anc rehearing) C!rtinEs con"iction as re"erse$ #!tthe a$missi#i&it' o% rea$ing materia& remains !nsett&e$

    On rehearing en #anc) C!rtinEs con"iction as re"erse$ an$ the casereman$e$ on the gro!n$s that the *re5!$icia& e%%ect o% the storiess!#stantia&&' o!teighe$ their *ro#ati"e "a&!e(201 .he co!rt a&soree+amine$ S'ymanovit70(categorica& e+c&!sion as a matter o% &a o%rea$ing materia& %rom the "arieties o% e"i$ence that might otherise %a&&ithin the reach o% R!&e 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    25/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 117.he ma5orit' %ai&e$ to a**ro*riate&' e+*ress the nee$ %or e+tra

    *reca!tions hen the re&e"ant e"i$ence is constit!tiona&&' *rotecte$rea$ing materia&( As !$ge Far$&a *ointe$ o!t in his $issent) the !se

    o% &a%!& rea$ing materia& to *ro"e intent is a $angero!s #!siness) an$ an'

    $istrict co!rt %ace$ ith s!ch an iss!e m!st a**roach it ca!tio!s&'(

    207

    !$geJ&ein%e&$ ent %!rther #' stating:

    Fe o!ght to #e ar' hen the go"ernment ants to !se hat *eo*&e

    rea$ against them( O!r %ree$om to rea$ an$ thinD re!ires a high a&&

    restricting o%%icia& scr!tin'( .he go"ernment or others< can smear

    *eo*&e #' re"ea&ing hat #ooDs the' #!' an$ #orro %rom the &i#rar')

    hat maga-ines the' *!rchase at the nesstan$) hat mo"ies the' rent

    at the "i$eo store) an$ hat the' &ooD at on the internet( ( ( ( Rea$ers

    sho!&$ not ha"e to hi$e hat the' rea$ to #e sa%e %rom the

    go"ernment(20

    A&tho!gh the Ninth Circ!itEs *osition on the !se o% rea$ing materia& ase"i$ence to *ro"e intent is not entire&' c&ear) it is a**arent that some 5!$ges

    are more ca!tio!s a#o!t in%ringing !*on the 6irst Amen$ment rights o% theacc!se$ than others( .he #iggest $anger) hoe"er) res!&ts %rom the NinthCirc!itEs %ai&!re to *ro"i$e so m!ch as a arning to the $istrict co!rtsagainst the risDs o% a$mitting s!ch e"i$ence(208

    @( .he .enth Circ!it A$$resse$ the Iss!e an$ =&timate&' .!rne$ a@&in$ 9'e .oar$s the RisD o% the =se o% Rea$ing Materia& as>ro*ensit' 9"i$ence

    oachim Gress&er as %o!n$ g!i&t' o% %irst $egree intentiona& homici$e%or the m!r$er o% ames Ma$$en(210 Gress&er an$ Ma$$en engage$ inhomose+!a& se+ an$ therea%ter) Gress&er m!r$ere$ an$ m!ti&ate$ Ma$$enEs#o$'(211 .he *o&ice searche$ Gress&erEs home an$ $isco"ere$ "i$eota*es)

    *hotogra*hs) an$ maga-ines $e*icting m!r$er an$ m!ti&ation "ictims) ase&& as homose+!a& *ornogra*h'(212.he tria& co!rt a$mitte$ the e"i$ence*!rs!ant to FisconsinEs other act stat!te ? 804(042

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    26/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    11 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348*ro#ati"e o% Gress&erEs homose+!a&it' an$ %ascination ith "io&ence(214

    .he $e%en$antEs %ascination ith $eath an$ m!ti&ation as a trait an$this trait is !n$enia#&' *ro#ati"e o% a moti"e) intent) or *&an to commit a"icio!s m!r$er(21

    On *ost,con"iction re&ie%) Gress&er cha&&enge$ the a$missi#i&it' o% s!che"i$ence !n$er the stat!te #!t a&so raise$ a 6irst Amen$ment cha&&enge( 21

    .he co!rt re5ecte$ the 6irst Amen$ment arg!ment an$ state$:

    .he %!n$amenta& %&a in Gress&erEs 6irst Amen$ment arg!ment) an$ the

    ma5or $isting!ishing %actor in the string o% #roa$ 6irst Amen$ment

    cases he re&ies !*on) is that he as not con"icte$ o% *ossessing)

    $istri#!ting) or &ooDing at the "i$eos an$ *ict!res in !estion( A&tho!gh

    the' ma' ha"e he&*e$ con"ict Gress&er o% m!r$er) he ne"er e+*&ains

    ho his right to *ossess or &ooD at them as a%%ecte$ #' their !se as

    e"i$ence against him( An$ Gress&er $ramatica&&' o"erstates the *otentia&

    chi&&ing e%%ect o% the e"i$entiar' !se o% these materia&s) as the' %orme$

    on&' one &inD in the &ong chain o% e"i$ence that *ro"e$ his g!i&t( ( ( ( I%

    Gress&er ere acc!se$ o% ca!sing an e+*&osion) a 5!r' co!&$ &ogica&&'in%er his g!i&t %rom the %act that a #om#,maDing man!a& as %o!n$ at

    his home(217

    .he co!rt o"er,sim*&i%ies the iss!e an$ e"a&!ates a$missi#i&it' entire&'on the iss!es o% re&e"ance an$ *ro#ati"e "a&!e( In $oing so) the co!rt

    com*&ete&' $isregar$s the $anger o% im*ermissi#&e character or *ro*ensit'in%erences that a 5!r' ma' $ra( A *erson o#sesse$ ith "io&ence is more&iDe&' to commit m!r$er an$ there%ore the "i$eos an$ *hotogra*hs arere&e"ant ( ( ( a&tho!gh the "i$eota*es an$ *ict!res ma' a&so *ro"e #a$character or *ro*ensit') the' ere o%%ered%or *ermissi#&e *!r*oses(21

    IB( @ALANCIN;.H9COM>9.IN;IN.9R9S.SO6>ROS9C=.ORIALN99GS

    ANGCONS.I.=.IONAL>RO.9C.IONSIn crimina& cases here the rea$ing materia& o% the acc!se$ is so!ght to

    #e intro$!ce$ into e"i$ence) there are com*eting interests that the tria&5!$ge m!st consi$er( .he *rosec!tion has the hea"' #!r$en o% esta#&ishinga&& the e&ements o% a crime in or$er to o#tain a con"iction(218 .he*rosec!tion i&& nat!ra&&' seeD to a$mit an' an$ a&& e"i$ence that i&& assistits case( More o%ten than not) rea$ing materia& in the $e%en$antEs *ossession

    214 . McCa&g'try) 23 6(3$ at 810(21 . Id.at 814(21 . Id. at 81(217 . Id.21 . Id.at 814 citation omitte$

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    27/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 118can he&* the *rosec!tion &inD the $e%en$ant to the crime(220

    Hoe"er) hen the right to rea$ &a%!& materia& is #eing !se$ ase"i$ence against the acc!se$) the constit!tiona& *rotections o% the 6irstAmen$ment are com*romise$: .here is no a"oi$ing the 6irst Amen$ment

    im*&ications o% !sing hat *eo*&e rea$ as e"i$ence o% hat the' $i$( .heConstit!tion has &ong *rotecte$ o!r *ri"ate *a*ers an$ tho!ghts) e"en thoseentire&' &acDing socia& "a&!e(221

    In$ee$) the right to rea$ sho!&$ not inc&!$e a ca"eat that an'thing 'o!rea$ can an$ i&& #e !se$ against 'o! in a co!rt o% &a( A$$itiona&&') thereare the genera& *ri"ac' rights o% the acc!se$ an$ $!e *rocess concernsarising %rom the !se o% s!ch e"i$ence( 6ina&&') the genera& *!#&ic at &argehas an interest in maintaining 6irst Amen$ment *rotections an$ %ree$omhi&e sti&& ens!ring that crimina&s i&& #e con"icte$ o% the crimes the'commit(

    A( O"er-ea&o!s >rosec!tors an$ !$ges) Co!*&e$ ith the Harm&ess9rror .est) Ha"e .ram*&e$ on the Constit!tiona&&' >rotecte$

    Rights o% Ge%en$ants

    1( Constit!tiona& rights an$ the &as o% e"i$ence *resentsigni%icant cha&&enges %or *rosec!tors seeDing to intro$!cerea$ing materia& into e"i$ence in or$er to o#tain a con"iction

    Bigoro!s&' en%orcing the &as o% e"i$ence an$ the constit!tiona&

    *rotections o% the acc!se$ ma' create the risD that the $e%en$ant i&& #ea#so&"e$ o% the crime #ase$ on a &acD o% e"i$ence( 222 In +nited State( v.C&rtin) !$ge .rottEs $issenting o*inion e+*resses %r!stration ith the &aso% e"i$ence an$ their *otentia& e%%ects:

    Fith the a&&s o% o!r homes #reache$ #' the Internet) o!r ne+t #est

    $e%ense is the &a( =n%ort!nate&') this case re"ea&s that the &as an$ the

    r!&es o% e"i$ence !*on hich societ' re&ies to *rotect itse&% %rom cr!e&

    $e"ianc' are no as *oro!s as the a&&s o% o!r homes) a&&oing

    &a#reaDers to *!&& the oo& o"er the e'es o% the 5!rors $e&egate$ to

    ens!re that o!r &as are %aith%!&&' im*&emente$( It seems that the &a o%

    re&e"anc' is no more concerne$ ith *rotecting a se+!a& *re$atorEs

    o#scene man!a&s on hat to $o to chi&$ren than ith *rotecting the rea&

    chi&$ren !*on hom the' *ractice their *er"ersions) as this case

    220 . See, e.g.) Gress&er "( McCa!ghtr' 23 6(3$ 80 7th Cir( 2001eo*&e "( Harris)

    No( 24247) 23337) 200 FL 327) at K Mich( A**( 6e#( 10) 200

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    28/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    120 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348i&&!strates(

    223

    A&tho!gh the &as o% e"i$ence in most cases orD to the $e%en$antEsa$"antage( It is not the &a o% re&e"anc' that *rotects the se+!a&*re$atorEs o#scene man!a&s( It is the 6irst Amen$ment) an$ not the &a o%

    re&e"anc') that *rotects the se+!a& *re$atorEs rea$ing materia&) no matterho "!&gar) in s*ite o% its re&e"ance( It is the &as o% re&e"anc') co!*&e$ith 6R9 404#

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    29/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 121iss!e o% Dno&e$ge the' ere !se$ sim*&' %or character e"i$ence(232.hee"i$ence as erroneo!s&' $eeme$ a$missi#&e) hoe"er) the a**ea&s co!rtconsi$ere$ the error harm&ess(233

    .he act!a& #ooDs ere not intro$!ce$ into e"i$ence an$ there%ore an

    6R9 404#< ana&'sis as ne"er con$!cte$( Ha$ the *rosec!tion so!ght toa$mit the materia&s into e"i$ence) it o!&$ ha"e s!re&' %ai&e$( .he$e%en$antEs so&e $e%ense as that he &acDe$ Dno&e$ge o% that *artic!&arg!nEs %!&&',a!tomatic ca*a#i&ities(234He $i$ not c&aim to &acD Dno&e$ge as

    to ho to con"ert semi,a!tomatic ea*ons into a!tomatic ea*ons or agenera& Dno&e$ge o% a!tomatic ea*ons his $e%ense %oc!se$ e+c&!si"e&'on the character o% that *artic!&ar g!n( 23.estimonia& itnesses) ho erea"ai&a#&e to the *rosec!tion) o!&$ ha"e re#!tte$ his &acD o% Dno&e$ge$e%ense as to the ca*a#i&ities o% that *artic!&ar g!n(23

    .he *rosec!tionEs so&e o#5ecti"e in !estioning the itness a#o!t the

    #ooDs an$ *am*h&ets as to smear the image o% the $e%en$ant) !estion his&a,a#i$ingness) an$ a&&o the 5!r' an o**ort!nit' to $ra im*ro*ercharacter in%erences(237.he co!rt note$ the %act that the sa&e o% s!ch #ooDsis &a%!&) an$ that s!ch #ooDs are common at g!n sho*s(23 .hego"ernmentEs attem*t to !se Ho&tEs e+ercise o% that &a%!& right as e"i$encethat he is not a &a,a#i$ing *erson is im*ro*er(238.he tria& 5!$ge erre$ ina&&oing the *rosec!tion to maDe re*eate$ re%erences to the #ooDs an$ theircontents) *artic!&ar&' since the' ere not a$mitte$ into e"i$ence !n$er

    6R9 404#< or otherise(240

    Ges*ite the tria& 5!$geEs error in a$mitting the e"i$ence) the a**ea&sco!rt he&$ that the error as harm&ess(241 .he go"ernmentEs !estionsa$$e$ &itt&e to the o"era&& im*act(242 Fhi&e this ma' or ma' not #e tr!e)ho $oes s!ch a r!&ing g!i$e tria& 5!$ges on ho to han$&e s!che"i$entiar' !ses in the %!t!re Sho!&$ mistaDes ma$e #' the tria& 5!$ge

    sim*&' #e g&osse$ o"er on a**ea&) to the $etriment o% the $e%ense MistaDeso"er&ooDe$ at tria& an$ not recti%ie$ on a**ea& are #o!n$ to arise again( Asimi&ar iss!e arose to 'ears &ater in +nited State( v. Roger() another

    232 . Id.at 702 .he recor$ is $e"oi$ o% an' e"i$ence that Ho&t e"er rea$ an' o% the

    #ooDs he so&$) an$ there%ore the testimon' co!&$ not $emonstrate his Dno&e$ge(

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    30/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    122 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348Se"enth Circ!it $ecision) in"o&"ing T'e Anarc'i(t0( Coo2#oo2(243.he tria&5!$ge a&&oe$ !estioning to *rocee$ an$ the a**ea&s co!rt note$:

    .he 5!$ge ha$ an o#&igation to Dee* the *rosec!tor %rom s!ggesting

    that Rogers sho!&$ #e con"icte$ #eca!se he one$ se$itio!s &iterat!re)

    that an'one ho o!&$ rea$ a #ooD ca&&e$ T'e Anarc'i(t0( Coo2#oo2m!st ho&$ his &ega& o#&igations in contem*t) or that *ossession o% the

    #ooD im*&ie$ that Rogers ante$ to #ecome a sni*er(244

    At tria&) Rogers $i$ not o#5ect to the *rosec!tor rea$ing *assages o% the

    #ooD to the 5!r'(24On a**ea&) Rogers conten$e$ the intro$!ction o% the*assages %rom the #ooD as in *&ain error(24.he a**ea&s co!rt re5ecte$ the*&ain,error arg!ment an$ !*he&$ the con"iction(247

    It as the %ai&!re o% the a**ea&s co!rt in 9o*t) to set *rece$ent an$ gi"etria& co!rts g!i$ance on the !se o% constit!tiona&&' *rotecte$ materia& ase"i$ence) that create$ this *ro#&em in Roger((24 Ho can constit!tiona&

    rights #e *rotecte$ i% tria& 5!$ges an$ *rosec!tors are gi"en the %ree$om totram*&e !*on them itho!t reco!rse A&tho!gh most i&& arg!e that &etting

    a g!i&t' man go %ree on a harm&ess error or a technica&it' is not $esira#&e)hen those harm&ess errors in"o&"e constit!tiona&&' *rotecte$ rights) thestaDes are higher(

    .he #roa$er !estion #ecomes) can the harm&ess,error test e"er #ea**&ie$ hen constit!tiona& rights are at staDe One commentator hass!ggeste$ that Congress sho!&$ amen$ the harm&ess error stat!te 2=(S(C ? 2111< to *rohi#it an a**e&&ate co!rt %rom e"er %in$ing anin%ringement o% a constit!tiona& right harm&ess(248 .o $e&"e into the!estion o% the constit!tiona&it' o% the harm&ess error test an' %!rther o!&$#e #e'on$ the sco*e o% this Note(20 Hoe"er) it is c&ear that more*rotection m!st #e gi"en to the &a%!& rea$ing materia& o% an acc!se$)

    243 ( =nite$ States "( Rogers) 270 6(3$ 107) 100 7th Cir( 2001( 2#< stating a *&ain error is an error that a%%ects

    s!#stantia& rights an$ ma' #e consi$ere$ e"en tho!gh it as not #ro!ght to the co!rtEs

    attention=@( L( 73 1887< %or a

    %!rther $isc!ssion on the iss!e(

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    31/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 123$es*ite its re&e"ance) e"en i% that e+tra *rotection res!&ts in a&&oing theg!i&t' to a&D %ree(

    @( Is the A$mission o% the Acc!se$Es Rea$ing Materia& into 9"i$encethe @'*ro$!ct o% >oor La'ering

    In the ma5orit' o% re*orte$ cases in hich a crimina& $e%en$antEs rea$ingha#its are intro$!ce$ at tria&) a 6irst Amen$ment cha&&enge is not raise$( 21

    Fhen the a$missi#i&it' o% the acc!se$Es rea$ing materia& is cha&&enge$)co!nse& %or the $e%ense i&& o%ten arg!e a &acD o% re&e"ance or !n$!e*re5!$ice against the $e%en$ant(22.hese cha&&enges are !s!a&&' ins!%%icient

    to o"ercome a$mission) gi"en a tria& co!rtEs i$e $iscretion in s!che"i$entiar' matters(23 Gamaging rea$ing materia& a$mitte$ at tria& is$i%%ic!&t to o"ercome on a**ea&(24

    It is not entire&' c&ear h' co!nse& %or $e%en$ants in s!ch sit!ationscontin!a&&' %ai& to raise a 6irst Amen$ment cha&&enge( One commentatorhas s!ggeste$ that *oor &a'ering ma' $etermine hether a 6irst

    Amen$ment cha&&enge is raise$:.he ma5orit' o% crimina& $e%en$ants are in$igent) re*resente$ #'

    a**ointe$ co!nse& ho are "er' o%ten o"erorDe$ an$ !n$er*ai$( .he

    &ength' $isc!ssions o% the 6irst Amen$ment in s!its against *ro$!cers

    are *ro#a#&' $!e to e+tensi"e #rie%ing o% the iss!es) hi&e the 6irst

    Amen$ment is rare&' raise$ in the %irst *&ace #' crimina& $e%en$ants

    cha&&enging cons!m*tion e"i$ence ( ( ( #etter &a'ering) #eginning ith

    time&' an$ acc!rate o#5ections) co!&$ go %ar toar$ changing the

    o!tcome ith res*ect to cons!m*tion e"i$ence in crimina& tria&s(2

    A&tho!gh there ma' #e some tr!th to the theor' that the %ai&!re to raise a6irst Amen$ment cha&&enge is a $irect res!&t o% a &acD o% reso!rces) it isim*ortant to note that these same attorne's ho %ai& to mention the 6irst

    Amen$ment o%ten raise other constit!tiona& cha&&enges(2 .his in$icatesthat these attorne's are not com*&ete&' inattenti"e to or !nac!ainte$ ith

    21 ( He&en A( An$erson) T'e Freedom to S)ea2 and t'e Freedom to Li(ten6 T'e

    Admi((i#i*ity o% t'e Crimina* De%endant0( Ta(te in Entertainment) 3 OR( L( R9B( 88) 817,

    1 2004

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    32/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    124 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348constit!tiona& matters( .here is no in$ication that a 6irst Amen$mentcha&&enge) re!ires more time or reso!rces than other constit!tiona&cha&&enges nor is it more $i%%ic!&t to o"ercome on a**ea&(

    !$ge >remo o% Ca&i%ornia has s!ggeste$ that a 6irst Amen$ment

    cha&&enge to the intro$!ction o% rea$ing materia& into e"i$ence o!&$ #e%!ti&e(27 Fhereas ci"i& attorne's are restraine$ #' the 6e$era& R!&es o%Ci"i& >roce$!re) s*eci%ica&&' R!&e 11)2crimina& $e%ense attorne's are not*re"ente$ %rom raising an' an$ a&& co&ora#&e arg!ments) $es*ite theirremote &iDe&ihoo$ o% s!ccess( La'ers %or $e%en$ants in sit!ations heree"i$ence an$ acts *rotecte$ !n$er the 6irst Amen$ment are #eing #ro!ghtinto e"i$ence m!st raise the 6irst Amen$ment cha&&enge imme$iate&'( Asmore attorne's #egin to $o so) more g!i$ance i&& #e gi"en %rom higherco!rts) an$ the !ncertaint' s!rro!n$ing the &a i&& $isso&"e(

    C( Co!rts an$ >rosec!tors Sho!&$ SeeD to A$mit Rea$ing Materia&into 9"i$ence #' Re&'ing Less on 6e$era& R!&e o% 9"i$ence404#rotecte$ Rea$ing Materia&

    Fhen 6irst Amen$ment rights are in"o&"e$) the state or other *art'seeDing to a$mit e"i$ence to o"ercome those rights) !s!a&&' carries a hea"'

    #!r$en o% 5!sti%ication(282 .he constit!tiona& stat!s o% &a%!& rea$ingmateria& arrants the greatest consi$eration hen it is #eing o%%ere$ ase"i$ence( It o!&$ #e *ro#&ematic i% this #!r$en co!&$ easi&' #e o"ercome#' a &acD o% a&ternati"e e"i$ence #' the *rosec!tion( I% the constit!tiona&iss!e is co&&a*se$ into an or$inar' e"i$entiar' $etermination o% rights) theacc!se$Es 6irst Amen$ment rights are not a$e!ate&' sa%eg!ar$e$283an$ ana&ternati"e a**roach is re!ire$(

    =*on the intro$!ction o% rea$ing materia& into e"i$ence) 5!$ges sho!&$*er%orm an initia& 6irst Amen$ment #a&ancing test in con5!nction ith the

    6R9 401 re&e"anc' test(284

    .he re&e"anc') or *otentia& re&e"anc') o% therea$ing materia& sho!&$ o!teigh the 6irst Amen$ment *rotections( .hetra$itiona& 6R9 401 re&e"anc' test m!st #e $iscar$e$ in these &imite$sit!ations an$ re*&ace$ ith a more rigi$ test that meas!res the re&e"anc'o% the rea$ing materia& against the $e%en$antEs %ree$om o% s*eech an$

    e+*ression) right to $!e *rocess) an$ *ri"ac' rights(

    .he tria& 5!$ge sho!&$ consi$er se"era& %actors in the 6irst Amen$ment#a&ancing test) s!ch as) hether the rea$ing materia& is &a%!& or!n&a%!&(28 La%!& rea$ing materia& i&& a&a's 5!sti%' the higher 6irstAmen$ment &e"e& o% *rotection(28.he 5!$ge sho!&$ a&so consi$er hetherthe $e%en$antEs 6irst Amen$ment rights are #eing com*romise$ an$ to

    hat e+tent(

    .he tria& 5!$ge sho!&$ consi$er ho c&ose&' the rea$ing materia& isre&ate$ to the crime committe$( I% the materia& as *art o% the crime) %ore+am*&e ine+trica#&' intertine$) the e"i$ence i&& #e a$missi#&e an$ an

    meet) an$ at the meeting attem*te$ to engage in se+!a& acti"it' #' *ers!asion an$

    coercion

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    37/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 1286R9 404#< test ma' #e #'*asse$(287 In sit!ations here the &inD is!ntena#&e) the 5!$ge sho!&$ e+c&!$e the a$missi#&e e"i$ence a&together)regar$&ess o% the minima& risD o% !n%air *re5!$ice( .he %acts an$

    circ!mstances o% the crime) the nat!re o% the rea$ing materia&) an$ the

    &ength o% time #eteen rea$ing the materia& an$ committing the crime arethe essentia& characteristics one m!st consi$er in $etermining the strengtho% the &inD( As the co!rt state$ in State v. Mi**ar) not on&' as thee"i$ence remote in terms o% time) #!t the &inD #eteen *ossession o% themaga-ine an$ $e%en$antEs *ro*ensit' to commit se+!a& o%%enses againstchi&$ren is ten!o!s) i% not none+istent(28

    .his a&ternati"e 6R9 401 re&e"anc' test o!&$ genera&&' orD toe+c&!$e on&' those sit!ations here the intr!sion !*on the 6irstAmen$ment right to rea$ an$ its negati"e cons!ences are great an$ itsre&e"anc' s&ight( An e+am*&e o% s!ch a sit!ation can #e %o!n$ in Stamey v.Georgia(288 .here) a more rigi$ 6R9 401 re&e"anc' test o!&$ ha"ecertain&' *rohi#ite$ the a$mission o% s!ch e"i$ence #e%ore an 6R9 404#(2$ 47 Or( 18

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    38/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    130 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348more a**ro*riate %oc!s o% the co!rt sho!&$ #e the *ro#ati"e "a&!e o% thee"i$ence( I% the *ro#ati"e "a&!e is &o) the e"i$ence sho!&$ #e he&$ina$missi#&e) regar$&ess o% its *re5!$icia& e%%ect( @' e&iminating thes!#stantia& re!irement o% 6R9 403) the co!rt i&& e&iminate those

    sit!ations in hich the e"i$ence has &itt&e *ro#ati"e "a&!e an$ e"en thes&ightest risD o% *re5!$icia& e%%ect) there#' ens!ring %!rther *rotection o% the6irst Amen$ment rights o% the acc!se$(

    .he constit!tiona& rights o% the acc!se$ can #e %!rther sa%eg!ar$e$ #' a&ess $e%erentia& stan$ar$ on a**ea&( A &oer stan$ar$ on a**ea& isa#so&!te&' necessar' hen the constit!tiona& rights o% the acc!se$ are atiss!e( .he c!rrent a#!se o% $iscretion stan$ar$ is too $i%%ic!&t too"ercome on a**ea& an$ m!st #e re*&ace$ #' an erroneo!s stan$ar$( Fhena tria& 5!$ge maDes an erroneo!s r!&ing that a%%ects the s!#stantia& rights o%a *art') that case m!st #e re"erse$( .his not on&' ass!res a $e%en$ant

    a$$itiona& constit!tiona& *rotections) #!t a&so gi"es more g!i$ance to the&oer co!rts on ho to $ea& ith s!ch e"i$entiar' matters as the' a**&' tothe Constit!tion( 9rrors ma$e at tria& that are sim*&' g&osse$ o"er on a**ea&$o not *ro"i$e the *rece$entia& "a&!e necessar' to e&!ci$ate the &a(A$$itiona&&') the harm&ess,error test sho!&$ no &onger #e a**&ie$ hen thematter *ertains to a constit!tiona& "io&ation(

    B( CONCL=SION

    In Dre((*er the co!rt $enie$ $e%ense co!nse&Es 6irst Amen$mentarg!ment an$ state$ that the 6irst Amen$ment $i$ not *rec&!$e thea$mission o% rea$ing materia& #eca!se the $e%en$ant as not on tria& %orhat he rea$ or hat he *ossesse$) e"en tho!gh it ma' !&timate&' he&*con"ict him(302 .he co!rt is correct in asserting that in cases here therea$ing materia& o% the acc!se$ is intro$!ce$ as e"i$ence) the $e%en$ant is

    not #eing con"icte$ %or rea$ing or *ossessing the materia&( Ne"erthe&ess)the co!rt inDre((*eracDno&e$ge$ that the e+ercise o% those rights ma' #e

    !se$ as e"i$ence against the in$i"i$!a& an$ ma' he&* con"ict him( It is*recise&' those sit!ationshere the rea$ing materia& is #eing !se$ to he&*con"ict the in$i"i$!a&that m!st #e strict&' scr!tini-e$ an$ &imite$(

    .he e"i$entiar' !sage o% a &a%!& e+ercise o% a constit!tiona& right is a$anger an$ &imitation !*on that right( A constit!tiona& right) s!ch as the

    %ree$om to rea$ &a%!& materia&) sho!&$ not #e s!#5ect to the o*en,en$e$*ossi#i&it' that the materia& ma' #e !se$ against the in$i"i$!a& in a crimina&*rocee$ing( .o gi"e a co!rt the !n%ettere$ $iscretion o% !sing an' t'*e o%rea$ing materia& remote&' re&ate$ to a crime o!&$ re*resent a ma5orconstraint on 6irst Amen$ment rights( S!ch a constraint on this right o!&$com*&ete&' !n$ermine the core %ree$om that o!r societ' har#ors( Fhi&e theS!*reme Co!rt has sai$ the 6irst Amen$ment $oes not erect a #arrier to the

    302 . Gress&er "( McCa!ghtr') 23 6(3$ 80) 81 7th Cir( 2001

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    39/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    200 READING MATERIAL AND FRE !"#$ 131a$mission o% e"i$ence)303 it has not s*eci%ie$ the o!ter #o!n$s o% this#arrier) i% one in$ee$ e+ists( .he &acD o% g!i$ance %rom the S!*reme Co!rthas &e%t &oer co!rts to gra**&e ith this iss!e(

    ;enera&&') the 6R9 an$ simi&ar state r!&es< *rohi#it the !se o% character

    e"i$ence(

    304

    .he materia& that one rea$s or *ossesses is character e"i$enceas it o%ten re%&ects oneEs interests) %antasies) #e&ie%s) an$ o#sessions( Fhatan in$i"i$!a& rea$s s*eaDs "o&!mes a#o!t their characterthis is *recise&'hat 6R9 404a< as $esigne$ to *re"ent(

    Notithstan$ing 6R9 404a

  • 8/12/2019 The Admissibility of an Accuseds Choice of Reading Material as Evidence Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b):

    40/40

    ALSAHLANIMACRO 3/7/2014 3/7/2014

    132 CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CONFINEMENT Bo&( 34:348test) an$ a &oer) &ess $e%erentia& stan$ar$ on a**ea&( It is this a!thorEs ho*ethat a ne a**roach is taDen an$ the constit!tiona& rights o% the acc!se$contin!e to #e sa%eg!ar$e$ to the highest $egree(

    M&t'ena A*(a'*ani