The 7th CJK Plenary Meeting

April 9 ~ 11, 2007, Jeju Island, Korea

CJK 7th Plenary(CJK Technical Report)

Chae Sub, LeeChae-sub.lee@ties.itu.int

Telecommunications Technology Association

The 7th CJK Meeting 2

1. Status of CJK activity

2. Impacts of CJK activities

3. Competence and Contribution

4. Proposal

5. Conclusion

ContentsContents

The 7th CJK Meeting 3

1. Status of CJK Activities1. Status of CJK Activities

MeetingsOverall-Cont.

CJK-Cont. Overall-Part. CJK-Part.

1. 2006(Geneva)

263 129 300 104

4. 2006(Kobe)

376 180 - -

7. 2006(Geneva)

304 194 299 137

10. 2006(Geneva)

256 146 - -

1. 2007(Beijing)

181 127 219 182

Simple statistics of CJK in ITU-T meetings: NGN

The 7th CJK Meeting 4

1. Status of CJK Activities1. Status of CJK Activities

MeetingsOverall-Cont.

CJK-Cont. Overall-Part. CJK-Part.

7. 2006(Geneva)

104 69 - -

10. 2006(Seoul)

153 109 209 156

1. 2007(USA)

169 110 193 86

Simple statistics of CJK in ITU-T meetings: IPTV

The 7th CJK Meeting 5

1. Status of CJK Activities1. Status of CJK Activities

1. Level of activity

- Continuously move: from information exchange to actual

collaborations (Test-bed, Common Drafting)

- Prior coordination on contributions before the ITU-T

meetings (Ad-hoc activity: NGN and IPTV now)

2. Participation status

- During the CJK meeting: Key technical leaders are there,

but need more participation of technical experts

- During the Ad-hoc activity: Most of technical experts are

there, but always shortage of time (because Ad-hoc

always met just before the day of ITU-T meetings)

The 7th CJK Meeting 6

1. Status of CJK Activities1. Status of CJK Activities

China

Japan Korea

Req. FA, QoSNACF, RACFRTCONV, MMFMC

FPBNAVS

NID, USNMDS/OSE

OAMIPv6, VPNCTMP,

NGN ScenarioIPTV Multicast

NGN Security

Gettingcloser

The 7th CJK Meeting 7

2. 2. Impacts of CJK ActivitiesImpacts of CJK Activities

1. CJK become “Majority” in ITU-T now

- In terms of “contributions” and “participants”

- Also become majority in “Editorships with Drafts”

- CJK is now become “Growth Engine” for ITU-T

2. But still need upgrade of CJK capabilities

- Quality of drafts from CJK editors become

serious issue now in ITU-T (in terms of English)

- need tuning between “Quantity and Quality”

“Growth Engine” is OK, but not “Feeding”

The 7th CJK Meeting 8

2. 2. Impacts of CJK ActivitiesImpacts of CJK Activities

3. Impacts of CJK activity into the Region

- Our region is the region with biggest potential

- CJK is the leading group in the region

- But no practical activities in the region until today

4. Impacts of CJK activity into each countries

- Encourage domestic members’ international activity

- Other impacts: ?

CJK activity is now 4 years old !!!

The 7th CJK Meeting 9

3. 3. Competence and ContributionCompetence and Contribution

1. Strengthen Competence

- need strengthen CJK experts’ competence for

international activity: Participating, Debating and Drafting

- for this, current Ad-Hoc activity is not enough

- full documentation in CJK should be the basement for

this: strategy and consensus building with descriptions

- taking consideration of followings:

> CJK is standard collaboration entity, not a standard entity

> mostly having difficulties with ETSI/ATIS full documents

Need CJK Full Documents?

The 7th CJK Meeting 10

3. 3. Competence and ContributionCompetence and Contribution

2. Extend Contributions

- effective contribution to international activity:

Proper Quality and Time (minimize time delay for drafting)

- contribution to the region as a leading group

- contribution to the country bring valuable results

- contribution to prepare interoperability and interconnection

frameworks in CJK (further will include the region)

- encourage CJK industries: Collaboration and competition

How CJK produce its own values?

The 7th CJK Meeting 11

4. Proposal4. Proposal

Information Exchange

Standard Collaboration

Common Drafting

Common Proposal Technical Report

CurrentStage

Proposed Future Flow of CJK Activity

The 7th CJK Meeting 12

4. Proposal4. ProposalWhat is difference of Technical Report?

Common Drafting/Proposal Technical Report

• Based on ITU-T contributions and drafts

• Target: Contribution to ITU-T• Result: ITU-T

Recommendation

• Based on CJK requirements and technology

• Target: industries and businesses in CJK and/or Region

• Result: CJK TR and/or APT Recommendation and/or ITU-T common proposal

The 7th CJK Meeting 13

4. Proposal4. ProposalCandidates for Technical Report (only for example)

NGN IPTV N-ID

• NGN Requirements

• End-End QoS• Interconnection

Frameworks• Security

Frameworks• Home Network

Frameworks• others

• IPTV Requirements

• End System (Set-top and its interface) Requirements

• IPTV Interconnection Frameworks

• others

• RFID Service Requirements

• RFID B2C and B2B2C Service Scenarios

• Mobile RFID Requirements

• others

The 7th CJK Meeting 14

4. Proposal4. Proposal

Assign mission to each relevant WG: NGN and N-ID WG

- Each WG set up projects according to the subjects:

clear Terms of Reference with life time

- Project leader will leading this TR activity

Project group will use following methods

- based on input contributions and editors inputs

- Face-Face meeting: CJK PL, CJK WG meetings and/or

its own meeting

- On-Line meeting: with own schedule

How to develop Technical Report?

The 7th CJK Meeting 15

5. Conclusion5. Conclusion

Promotion of CJK Activities, considering

- portion and role in ITU-T: upgrade of our capability

- leaders in the region: extend our contributions

- impacts within national community: increasing values

Technical Report should be one of the way

- help to upgrade our documentation capabilities

- will be used as contributions for the region

- CJK industries and business players will find another

opportunity (e.g. increasing buying power)

The 7th CJK Meeting 16

Thank you foryour attention !!!