Texasbusmark2005 retrospective
-
Upload
drjeffallen -
Category
Business
-
view
102 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Texasbusmark2005 retrospective
![Page 1: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Why Evaluate?Excuses, Excuses, Excuses….
• I don’t have the time.• I don’t have to…it’s not required.• The district does it.• Grades are my evaluation• Follow-ups are a waste of time• Others???
![Page 2: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Evaluation Myth #8
“I don’t need to justify my existence, I have a proven track record.”
- Phillips, 1991
![Page 3: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Data (Where do I find it?)
Hard Data– Output (in basic work units)
– Quality (quality of the output)
– Cost (operating, administrative, & capital expenditures)
– Time (savings)
*** If these are not available ***
try to convert soft data
![Page 4: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Data (Where do I find it?)
Soft Data– Work Habits– New Skills – Work Climate– Development/Advancement– Feeling/Attitudes– Initiative
![Page 5: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Evaluation Myth #9
“The emphasis on evaluation should be the same in all organizations.”
- Phillips, 1991
![Page 6: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Evaluation Myth #11
“Evaluation would probably cost too much.”
- Phillips, 1991
![Page 7: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Retrospective Analysis
An Example from a law firm:
![Page 8: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
When does it work?
When:
• Learners don’t….– Know what they don’t know
• There is insufficient time for pre-test.
• In other words: When you must have post-knowledge to self-measure pre-knowledge
![Page 9: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Why does it work?
• More accurate measure of actual learning
• Provide more differentiation in learning
• There is insufficient time for pre-testing.
In other words: When you must have post-knowledge to self-measure pre-knowledge
![Page 10: Texasbusmark2005 retrospective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082501/5461ce73b1af9fbc4d8b4e16/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Dr. Jeff M. Allen
University of North Texas
Department of Technology
and Cognition
P.O. Box 311337Denton, Texas 76203-
1337
Email: [email protected]: (940)565-2093