TEST REPORT - Emerson...TEST REPORT Report Number: 100739395MIN-005 Project Number: G100739395 ......

TEST REPORT

Report Number: 100739395MIN-005 Project Number: G100739395

Testing performed on the USB Fieldbus Interface

To

IEC 61326-1: 2005 Class B for Emissions, Basic Immunity Test Requirem ents

47 CFR, Part 15:2010, §15.107 and §15.109, Class B ICES-003, Issue 4:2004

For Emerson Process Management

Test Performed by: Test Authorized by: Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc.

7250 Hudson Blvd., Suite 100 Oakdale, MN 55128 USA

Asset Optimization Business Unit of Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. 12001 Technology Drive

Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA

Prepared by: Date: June 26, 2012 Clay Huff

Reviewed by: Date: June 26, 2012 Norman Shpilsher

This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.

EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005 of 19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE (EUT) .................................................................................3 2.0 TEST SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................4

2.1 Statement of the Measurement Uncertainty..............................................................................4 3.0 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST .......................................................................................................5

3.1 Power Configuration .....................................................................................................................5 3.2 EUT Configuration.........................................................................................................................5 3.3 Environmental conditions .............................................................................................................5 3.4 Performance level .........................................................................................................................6

4.0 TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS ........................................................................................7 4.1 Line Conducted Emissions ..........................................................................................................7 4.2 Radiated Emissions ....................................................................................................................11 4.5 Immunity Requirements..............................................................................................................15

4.5.1 Electrostatic Discharge ......................................................................................................15 4.5.2 Radiated, Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field .......................................................17

5.0 TEST EQUIPMENT.....................................................................................................................19


1.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE (EUT)

Model: USB Fieldbus Interface

Type of EUT: USB to Foundation Fieldbus Communication Interface

Serial Number / Intertek Sample ID: MIN1206080941-003

Company: Emerson Process Management

Customer: Mr. Anis Ahmad

Address:

Asset Optimization Business Unit of Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. 12001 Technology Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA

Phone: (952) 828-3946

Fax: (952) 828-3299

e-mail: [email protected]

Test Standards:

EN 55022:2010 / AC:2011, Class

EN 55011:2009 +A1:2010, Group , Class 47 CFR, Part 15:2010, §15.107 and §15.109, Class B EN 55014-1:2006 +A1:2009 +A2:2011 ICES-003, Issue 4:2004 IEC 61326-1:2005

Class B for Radiated and Conducted Emissions Basic Immunity Test Requirements Immunity Test Requirements for Industrial Locations

EN 60601-1-2:2001 +A1:2006 EN 61000-6-3:2007 +A1:2011 EN 61000-6-4:2007 +A1:2011 EN 61000-3-2:2006 +A1:2009 +A2:2009 EN 61000-3-3:2008 EN 61000-6-1:2007 EN 61000-6-2:2005 EN 55024:2010 EN 55014-2:1997 +A1:2001 A2:2008

Other

Date Sample Submitted: May 30, 2012

Test Work Started: June 7, 2012

Test Work Completed: June 8, 2012

Test Sample Conditions: Damaged Poor (Usable) Good

Prototype Production Used


2.0 TEST SUMMARY Referring to the performance criteria and the operating mode during the tests specified in this report, the equipment complies with the requirements according to the following standards.

TEST STANDARD TEST RESULT

CISPR 11 / FCC Part 15.109 Radiated Emissions Pass

CISPR 11 / FCC Part 15.107 Conducted Emissions Pass

IEC 61000-3-2 Harmonic Current Emissions N/A

IEC 61000-3-3 Voltage Fluctuations Emissions N/A

IEC 61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Pass

IEC 61000-4-3 Radiated Electromagnetic Field Immunity Pass

IEC 61000-4-4 Burst Immunity N/A

IEC 61000-4-6 Conducted RF Immunity N/A

IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Immunity N/A

IEC 61000-4-8 Rated Power-Frequency Field Immunity N/A

IEC 61000-4-11 Voltage Dips/Short Interruptions Immunity N/A

Notes:

1. Harmonic Current Emissions, Voltage Fluctuations Emissions, Burst Immunity, Conducted RF Immunity, Surge Immunity, Voltage Dips/Short Interruptions Immunity tests were not performed as EUT is DC powered equipment and all I/O cables are less then 3.0m in length.

2. Rated Power-Frequency Field Immunity test was not performed as the EUT contains no magnetic sensitive devices.

2.1 Statement of the Measurement Uncertainty Note 1: The measured result in this report is within the specification limits by more than the

measurement uncertainty; the measured result indicates that the product tested complies with the specification limit.

The expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for radiated emissions from 30 to 1000 MHz has been determined to be: ±4 dB at 10m and ±5.4 dB at 3m The expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for conducted emissions from 150 kHz to 30 MHz has been determined to be: ±2.6 dB


3.0 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST 3.1 Power Configuration Rated voltage: 120VAC 230VAC 400VAC 5 VDC from Local Computer Rated current: 500 mA Rated frequency: 50Hz 60Hz Number of phases: 1 Phase 3 Phases 3.2 EUT Configuration The equipment under test was operated during the measurement under the following conditions:

- Standby - Continuous Normal Operation (see details below) - Test program

Operating modes of the EUT:

No. Description

1 Power segment Mode of operation. Running the ConfigUtility on the local PC and communicating with the Fieldbus transmitter. The EUT is connected to PC/Laptop using USB cable. The other side of the EUT is connected to the Foundation Fieldbus power hub which is connected to the pressure transmitter.

Monitoring of the EUT:

No. Description

1 Reading live Dynamic values from the device continuously on the Local PC Display using USB cable for continuous updating Dynamic Values.

Cables:

No. Type Length Designation Note

1 2-wire shielded 2.0 m Power 2 USB shielded 1.0 m USB

Support equipment/Services :

No. Item Description

1 GT-41052-1524 FieldBus Power Source 2 300S1AFM5 Pressure transmitter Device 3 Dell Computer Local Computer 4 FIELDBUS Power Hub FCS-PH-PL FieldBus Hub

General notes:

None


3.3 Environmental conditions During the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges: Temperature: 15-35 ° C Humidity: 30-60 % Atmospheric pressure: 86-106 kPa 3.4 Performance level The test results shall be classified in terms of the loss of function or degradation of performance of the equipment under test, relative to a performance level defined by its manufacturer or the requestor of the test, or agreed between the manufacturer and the purchaser of the product. Definition related to the performance level: based on the used product standard based on the declaration of the manufacturer, requestor or purchaser Criterion A: Normal performance within the specification limits.

Criterion B: Temporary degradation or loss of function or performance which is self-recovering.

Criterion C: Temporary degradation in performance or loss of function or performance which requires operator intervention or system reset.


4.0 TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS 4.1 Line Conducted Emissions Test result: Pass Frequency range: 0.15MHz-30MHz Max. Emissions margin: 3.1dB below the limits Notes:

The EUT powered at 5VDC from USB port of the Local Computer, therefore, testing was performed at AC port of the Local Computer.


Test Setup Photos


Date: June 7, 2012 Tested by: Clay Huff Standard: FCC Part 15.107, Class B Test Point: Line 1 and Line 2 Operation mode: See page 5 Note: None

Result: Pass

Table 1

Line 1Frequency QP AVG Cable Loss QP Lim AVG Lim QP Margin AVG Margin

MHz dBµV dBµV dB dBµV dBµV dB dB

0.155 50.2 34.2 0.1 65.7 55.7 -15.4 -21.40.259 45.2 42.0 0.1 61.5 51.5 -16.2 -9.40.520 39.8 29.8 0.2 56.0 46.0 -16.0 -16.06.530 34.5 28.5 0.6 60.0 50.0 -24.9 -20.920.510 51.4 44.4 1.1 60.0 50.0 -7.5 -4.521.120 49.4 43.3 1.1 60.0 50.0 -9.5 -5.6

Line 2

Frequency QP AVG Cable Loss QP Lim AVG Lim QP Margin AVG MarginMHz dBµV dBµV dB dBµV dBµV dB dB

0.161 48.3 39.8 0.1 65.4 55.4 -17.0 -15.50.302 44.7 41.7 0.1 60.2 50.2 -15.4 -8.40.552 36.7 30.2 0.2 56.0 46.0 -19.1 -15.615.900 44.8 40.5 1.0 60.0 50.0 -14.2 -8.521.200 41.7 32.7 1.1 60.0 50.0 -17.2 -16.221.230 52.3 45.8 1.1 60.0 50.0 -6.6 -3.1


Graph 1

Graph 2


4.2 Radiated Emissions Test location: OATS Anechoic Chamber Test distance: 10 meters 3 meters Test result: Pass Frequency range: 30MHz-1000MHz Max. Emissions margin: 9.8dB below the limits Notes:

The Radiated Emissions Testing was performed in the Anechoic chamber at 3m measurement distance (see Tables 2-3 and Graphs 3-4);


Test Setup Photos


Date: June 7, 2012 Tested by: Clay Huff Standard: CISPR 11, Class B / FCC Part 15.109 Test Point: Enclosure Operation mode: See page 5 Note: None

Result: Pass

Table 2 (CISPR 11 Limits)

Frequency Antenna Ant. CF Cable loss Pre-amp QP Reading Total @ 3m Limit Margin CommentsMHz Polarity Hts(cm) dB1/m dB Gain (dB) dBµV dBµV/m dBµV/m dB

31.62 V 107 18.9 0.5 0.0 7.2 26.6 40.0 -13.443.54 V 107 12.4 0.6 0.0 9.6 22.6 40.0 -17.4114.53 V 107 12.6 1.1 0.0 15.1 28.8 40.0 -11.2143.20 V 107 11.9 1.3 0.0 12.6 25.8 40.0 -14.2249.99 V 107 13.0 1.7 0.0 21.5 36.2 47.0 -10.8797.51 V 107 20.9 3.4 0.0 7.5 31.8 47.0 -15.2

30.20 H 107 19.7 0.5 0.0 3.4 23.6 40.0 -16.4143.74 H 107 11.9 1.3 0.0 5.5 18.6 40.0 -21.4249.99 H 107 13.0 1.7 0.0 16.2 30.9 47.0 -16.1400.86 H 107 16.4 2.3 0.0 11.4 30.1 47.0 -16.9400.91 H 107 16.4 2.3 0.0 11.2 29.9 47.0 -17.1797.80 H 160 20.9 3.4 0.0 11.6 35.9 47.0 -11.1

Table 3 (FCC 15.109 Limits)

Frequency Antenna Ant. CF Cable loss Pre-amp QP Reading Total @ 3m Limit Margin CommentsMHz Polarity Hts(cm) dB1/m dB Gain (dB) dBµV dBµV/m dBµV/m dB

31.62 V 107 18.9 0.5 0.0 7.2 26.6 40.0 -13.443.54 V 107 12.4 0.6 0.0 9.6 22.6 40.0 -17.4

114.53 V 107 12.6 1.1 0.0 15.1 28.8 43.5 -14.7143.20 V 107 11.9 1.3 0.0 12.6 25.8 43.5 -17.8249.99 V 107 13.0 1.7 0.0 21.5 36.2 46.0 -9.8797.51 V 107 20.9 3.4 0.0 7.5 31.8 46.0 -14.2

30.20 H 107 19.7 0.5 0.0 3.4 23.6 40.0 -16.4143.74 H 107 11.9 1.3 0.0 5.5 18.6 43.5 -24.9249.99 H 107 13.0 1.7 0.0 16.2 30.9 46.0 -15.1400.86 H 107 16.4 2.3 0.0 11.4 30.1 46.0 -15.9400.91 H 107 16.4 2.3 0.0 11.2 29.9 46.0 -16.1797.80 H 160 20.9 3.4 0.0 11.6 35.9 46.0 -10.1


Graph 3

Graph 4


4.5 Immunity Requirements 4.5.1 Electrostatic Discharge Date: June 8, 2012 Tested by: Clay Huff Standard: IEC 61000-4-2 Test Point: Enclosure Operation mode: See Page 5 Note: None

Result: Pass

Test specification Contact discharge voltage: 2 kV 4 kV 6 kV Air discharge voltage: 2 kV 4 kV 6 kV 8 kV Discharge impedance: 330 Ω / 150 pF Other:

Discharge factor: ≥ 1 sec. Number of discharges: ≥ 10 per each test level and polarity

Direct Discharge Air Discharge Direct Discharge Contact Discharge

Type of discharge:

Indirect Discharge Contact Discharge Polarity: Positive Negative Test Setup: see photo of the test set-up Discharge location: all external locations accessible by hand

horizontal plate (HCP) vertical coupling plate (VCP) Notes:

During the test no deviation was detected to the selected operation mode(s).


Test Setup Photos


4.5.2 Radiated, Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Fi eld Test location: Immunity Anechoic Chamber 3 meters Anechoic Chamber Date: June 8, 2012 Tested by: Clay Huff Standard: IEC 61000-4-3 Test Point: Four sides of EUT Operation mode: See Page 5 Note: None

Result: Pass

Test specification Frequency range and Field strength:

80 to 1000 MHz 10 V/m 3 V/ m 1 V/ m

1.4 to 2.0 GHz 10 V/m 3 V/m 1 V/m

2.0 to 2.7 GHz 10 V/m 3 V/m 1 V/m

EUT - antenna separation: 2.5 m Modulation: AM: 80 %

sinusoidal 1000Hz PM duty cycle 50% 100Hz 900 MHz Pulse Modulation

Frequency step: 1 % with 3 sec dwell time Antenna polarisation: horizontal vertical

Notes:

During the test no deviation was detected to the selected operation mode(s).


Test Setup Photos


5.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL SERIAL NO. INTERTEK

ID CAL DUE USED

Spectrum Analyzer R & S ESU 100398 25283 12/09/2012

Bicono-Log Antenna Schaffner-Chase CBL 6112 B 2468 9734 11/08/2012

LISN Fischer Custom Communications FCC-LISN-50-32-2-01 97-01 9835 01/24/2013

System Quantum Change TILE! Instrument Control Ver. 3.4.K.29 15259 VBU

Power Amplifier IFI SMX150 N987-0809 26024 VBU

Signal Generator R & S SMT 03 DE12157 9950 11/17/2012

ESD Simulator Schaffner NSG 438 311 17071 03/07/2013

Radiant Arrow Antenna Amplifier Research AT5080 304256 12723 VBU

Power Meter HP HP 437B 3125U15049 17661 01/26/2013

Power Sensor HP 8482H 1545A01012 MIN-0076 05/15/2013

Power Amplifier Milmega ASO104-30/30BB 980047 12665 VBU

Test Verification of Conformity

Applicant Name & Address : Asset Optimization Busin ess Unit of Fisher-Rosemount

Systems, Inc. 12001 Technology Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA

Product(s) Tested : USB to Foundation Fieldbus Communication Interface

Model(s) : USB Fieldbus Interface

Brand name : Emerson Process Management

Relevant Standard(s)/Specification(s) : IEC 61326-1:2005, Class B for Radiated and Conducted Emissions Basic Immunity Test Requirements 47 CFR, Part 15:2010, §15.107 and §15.109, Class B ICES-003, ISSUE 4: 2004

Verification Issuing Office Name & Address

: Intertek, Oakdale, Minnesota EMC Department

Date of Test(s) : June 7, 2012 – Jun 8, 2012

Verification/Report Number(s) : 100739395MIN-005

NOTE : This verification is part of the full test r eport(s) and should be read in conjunction with it .

Signature:

Name: Norman Shpilsher

Position: EMC Team Leader

Date: June 26, 2012

www.intertek.com SD 12.3.1 (4/29/08) Mandatory

On the basis of the tests undertaken, the sample(s) of the below product have been found to comply with the essential requirements of the re ferenced specifications at the time the tests were carried out.

This Verification is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this Verification. Only the Client is authorized to copy or distribute this Verification. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results referenced from this Verification are relevant only to the sample tested. This Verification by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.

7250 Hudson Blvd., Suite 100, Oakdale, MN 55128 Tel.: 1 651-730-1188, Fax: 1 651-730-1282

TEST REPORT - Emerson...TEST REPORT Report Number: 100739395MIN-005 Project Number: G100739395 ......

Documents

Transcript of TEST REPORT - Emerson...TEST REPORT Report Number: 100739395MIN-005 Project Number: G100739395 ......