Terry Hnath Chisolm - PhonakPro...`Lynette Dornton, Au.D. Student, University of South Florida `This...
Transcript of Terry Hnath Chisolm - PhonakPro...`Lynette Dornton, Au.D. Student, University of South Florida `This...
-
Terry Hnath Chisolm
Hearing Care for Adults 2009The Challenge of AgingNovember 16-18, 2009
Chicago, IL
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, and Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service and, in part, by Phonak Corporation.
-
Rachel McArdle, Ph.D., Chief ASPS, Bay Pines VAHC, Bay Pines, Florida
Lynette Dornton, Au.D. Student, University of South Florida
-
This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Bay Pines VA Healthcare SystemPortions of this work were supported by Phonak CorporationThe contents do not represent the views of the Phonak Corporation and/or the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government
-
0
30
6090
120
150
180
210
240270
300
330
60
40
20
0
Directional MicrophonesDigital Noise Reduction
-
Distance4 ft.
54 dBA54 dBA48 dBA48 dBA42 dBA42 dBA
8 ft.
16 ft.
32 ft.
75 dBA75 dBA
60 dBA60 dBA
Arthur Boothroyd: with permission
-
Free fieldEnclosed space
Reverberation
Direct sound
Reverberation
Arthur Boothroyd: with permission
-
Noise: External &
Internal
Internal noise
Heating, ventilation, &air-conditioning noise
Air-borne noise
Air-borne noise
Structure-borne noise
Arthur Boothroyd: with permission
-
1)
With one companion in a noisy restaurant◦
Mark’s wife often reminds him to bring his FM when they go to a restaurant as it make life not only easier for him but also for her.
2)
With another couple in a restaurant◦
FM must be placed in a strategic location, as close to everyone as possible. While far from perfect, it works better than trying to hear 3 other people with hearing aids alone.
-
3)
Driving in a car◦
Not a good idea to watch the lips of the speaker–
Safety more important than communication.
◦
Use of FM system allows the passenger to talk to the driver without the river taking his or her attention off the road.
-
4)
In a noisy group situation◦
Handheld FM microphone best way for a hard hearing person to function tolerably
◦
Takes a bit of assertiveness
◦
Communication is a two-way street
◦
Person with the hearing loss bears the greatest responsibility
-
5.
Watching T.V.◦
Both at home and while traveling◦
Wife can read while Mark watches T.V.
6.
Many other situations:◦
Small meetings◦
Walking down street in noisy city◦
Lectures◦
Tours◦
Etc.
-
FM
Noise
Arthur Boothroyd: with permission
-
Are outcomes of FM use better than outcomes for hearing aid alone use in older adults?
Does age influence outcomes of FM use?
-
Exploratory re-examination of data from:
◦
Dornton, L. (2009). Outcomes of FM use in adults with custom hearing aids. Unpublished Doctor of Audiology Project, University of South Florida.
-
All males recruited from Bay Pines VAHCExperienced hearing aid users (at least 1-month with current custom hearing aids)◦
(D-mics and t-Coils)
Reporting a problem FM may assist
-
Randomly assigned◦
Hearing Aids Alone (HA; n = 18)
◦
Hearing Aids + FM (HA+FM; n = 18)
Age Range: 53-85 y/o◦
HA-Only: Mean = 76.6 y/o (SD = 6.8)◦
HA+FM: Mean = 72.5 y/o (SD = 9.5)
-
< 70 y/o (n= 8)◦
HA-alone (n = 3)◦
HA+ FM (n = 5)
70-79 y/o (n =16)◦
HA-Alone (n = 7)◦
HA+FM (n =9)
> 80 y/o (n =12)◦
HA-Alone (n =8)◦
HA+FM (n =4)
-
Hearing Aids
-
Hearing Aids NumberINTERTON INSTINCT NS30 ITC 1INTERTON INSTINCT NS40 HS 4 4INTERTON INSTINCT NS60 FS 1MICRO-TECH RADIUS 12 HS 4 4MICRO-TECH RADIUS 12 ITC 1MICRO-TECH RADIUS 12 ITE 3 3MICRO-TECH RADIUS 16 HS 2 2MICRO-TECH RADIUS 16 ITE 3 3PHONAK CLARO HS 1PHONAK PERSEO 23 DAZ HS 3 3PHONAK SAVIA 33 DSZ FS 3 3SIEMENS ARTIS ITC 1SIEMENS ARTIS HS 1SIEMENS MUSIC D FS 1SIEMENS TRIANO HS 1SIEMENS TRIANO ITC 1SIEMENS TRIANO ITE 3 3STARKEY DESTINY 1600 ITE 1UNITRON EVO FS 1Total 36
-
The MyLink- FM receiver which uses induction loop technology to interface with any hearing aid containing a telecoil
ZoomLink- FM transmitter with Omni-Zoom- and SuperZoom capabilities
MyLink
ZoomLink
-
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained Goals
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Able to hear and understand the wife whileat a restaurant
Able to understand wife when she is drivingthe car.
Understand T.V. at a level that is comfortable for wife
H. Dillon (NAL) et al
-
Age GroupHA HA+FM HA HA+FM HA HA+FM
1 or 2 Quiet 7.1% 5.0% 4.5%1 or 2 Noise 12.5% 14.3% 15.0% 16.0% 18.2% 18.2%Group Quiet 12.5% 4.0%Group Noise 50.0% 28.6% 50.0% 32.0% 36.4% 18.2%TV/Radio 12.5% 21.4% 20.0% 24.0% 13.6% 36.4%Telephone 4.5%Meeting 12.5% 28.6% 10.0% 4.0% 4.5% 9.1%Other 20.0% 18.2% 18.2%
-
Age GroupHA HA+FM HA HA+FM HA HA+FM
1 or 2 Quiet 7.1% 5.0% 4.5%1 or 2 Noise 12.5% 14.3% 15.0% 16.0% 18.2% 18.2%Group Quiet 12.5% 4.0%Group Noise 50.0% 28.6% 50.0% 32.0% 36.4% 18.2%TV/Radio 12.5% 21.4% 20.0% 24.0% 13.6% 36.4%Telephone 4.5%Meeting 12.5% 28.6% 10.0% 4.0% 4.5% 9.1%Other 20.0% 18.2% 18.2%
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Ability to meet individualized goals of device use (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement; COSI; Dillon et al., 1997)
Satisfaction with devices (MarkeTrak; Kochkin, 1990)
Benefit in terms of self-perception of reductions in restrictions in auditory abilities (Speech, Spatial, & Qualities Questionnaire, SSQ; Gatehouse & Noble, 2004)
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
Willingness to Pay
F/U FM fitting
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Systematic Counseling, coaching, and instruction (30-45 min)(Chisolm et al, 2007)
-
Oral Written
-
Demonstrate appropriate use of devices for various listening situations
-
Helps the patient remember instrument system options and settings.Easily carried in a pocket Quick reference guide Reduces new user frustrations
Turnto
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
2 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
2 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
2 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
2 wks
5 total interim visits
4/5 (HA+FM)
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Research Visit #1
HA HA+FM
Obtained GoalsBaseline Outcome Measures
HA use
FM Fit
HA+FM use
Research Visit #2
Interim Phone Call
HA and HA+FM
users called
Problems Reported=
Interim Visit
HA HA+FM
Complete Outcome Measures
Offered FM system
Offered to continue FM use
2 wks 2/4 wks
-
Hearing Aid Use Alone (HA)Hearing Aid + FM System (HA+FM)
-
Able to hear and understand the wife whileat a restaurant
Able to understand wife when she is drivingthe car.
Understand T.V. at a level that is comfortable for wife
H. Dillon (NAL) et al
13
5
-
Able to hear and understand the speaker atmonthly men's club meetings at church.
Able to understand wife when she is drivingthe car.
Understand T.V. at a level that is comfortable for wife
H. Dillon (NAL) et al
13
5
-
Selected items from MarkeTrak Survey [Kochkin, 1990]
-
• Device Features• e.g., visibility, reliability, natural sounding, etc
• 16 items
• Various Listening Situations• e.g., watching TV, riding in a car, etc• 14 items
-
Very VeryUnsatisfied
Satisfied
1 3 5
-
50-item questionnaire (Version 3.1)◦
Speech: 14 items◦
Spatial: 17 items◦
Other “Qualities”: 19 items
-
Individual item scores
Average Speech, Spatial & Qualities Scale Scores
10 Pragmatic Scale Scores
-
4 Pragmatic Speech Scales◦
Speech in Quiet◦
Speech in Noise◦
Speech in Speech Contexts◦
Multiple Speech-Stream Processing and Switching
2 Pragmatic Spatial Scales◦
Localization◦
Distance and Movement
4 Pragmatic Other Qualities Scales◦
Sound Quality and Naturalness◦
Identification of Sound and Objects◦
Segregation of Sounds◦
Listening Effort
-
****
-
Speech Context Multiple Speech Streams
-
** **
-
Sound Quality & Naturalness Listening Effort
-
Decision to keep FM devices beyond trial period
16 of 18 elected to continue use of FM systems at trial end!
1 in 80+ y/o group1 in < 70 y/o group
-
Are outcomes of FM use better than outcomes for hearing aid alone use in older adults?
Does age influence outcomes of FM use?
-
Are outcomes of FM use better than outcomes for hearing aid alone use in older adults?◦
YES
Individualized Goals (except groups in noise)Satisfaction Benefit
Cognitively challenging speech understanding conditions and Listening Effort
-
Does age influence outcomes of FM use?
No, for meeting Individualized GoalsYes, Satisfaction increasing as mean age increased
-
Does age influence outcomes of FM use?
Yes, with Benefit decreasing as mean age increased for:
Speech in Speech ContextsMultiple Speech Stream Processing and SwitchingListening Effort
-
Does age influence outcomes of FM use?
Benefit decreasing as mean age increased
Not surprising finding
SNR-50 increased as mean age increasedRole of cognitive functioning
-
Older adults can benefit from FM use
Optimize outcomes:
◦
Counseling, coaching, instruction
◦
Additional intervention approaches:Auditory-visual perceptual trainingConversational fluency training
-
Dillon, H., James, A., & Ginis, J. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several others measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology . 8, 27-43.Gatehouse, S., Noble, W. (2004). The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 43, 85-99.Kochkin, S. (1990). Introducing MarkeTrak: a consumer tracking survey for the hearing instrument market. Hearing Journal, 43, 17.27.Pichora-Fuller, M.K., & Singh, G. (2006). Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiological rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification, 10, 29-59.Ross, M. (2004). Listening with a “Third” Ear: FM Systems. Downloaded from: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/pf_article_detail.asp?article_id=561.
http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/pf_article_detail.asp?article_id=561
Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Slide Number 37Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Slide Number 41Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Slide Number 47Slide Number 48Slide Number 49Slide Number 50Slide Number 51Slide Number 52Slide Number 53Slide Number 54Slide Number 55Slide Number 56Slide Number 57Slide Number 58Slide Number 59Slide Number 60Slide Number 61Slide Number 62Slide Number 63Slide Number 64Slide Number 65Slide Number 66Slide Number 67Slide Number 68Slide Number 69Slide Number 70Slide Number 71Slide Number 72Slide Number 73Slide Number 74Slide Number 75Slide Number 76Slide Number 77Slide Number 78Slide Number 79Slide Number 80Slide Number 81Slide Number 82Slide Number 83Slide Number 84Slide Number 85