Terramin TSF Base Lining

Click here to load reader

download Terramin TSF Base Lining

of 37

  • date post

  • Category


  • view

  • download


Embed Size (px)


Terramin TSF Base Lining. Examining the design criteria :– a risk based design process Agenda for Strathalbyn CCC Meeting Review of the relevant components of the TSF Guidelines developed specifically for the project Interaction between PIRSA and the EPA Specific design criteria - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Terramin TSF Base Lining

  • Terramin TSF Base LiningExamining the design criteria : a risk based design process

    Agenda for Strathalbyn CCC MeetingReview of the relevant components of the TSFGuidelines developed specifically for the projectInteraction between PIRSA and the EPASpecific design criteriaHow will the TSF perform?Importance of underdrains (flow net analyses)Filling schematicsHow will the TSF be monitored?How will the pond size fluctuate?What happens if decant pond exceeds design area?How will the TSF be closed (decommissioned)?Some relevant images

  • What are we looking at?

  • Design guidelines were developed by PIRSA and the EPA specifically for this projectGuidelines for the Management of Tailingsat theProposed Angas Zinc Project,Strathalbyn, South Australia

  • These design guidelines were based around the followingIn view of the high potential for contamination from any discharge from this site, and the outcomes be they real or perceived, in this environmentally important location, the environmental outcome set for the proponents to meet is:No contamination of natural water drainage systems, ground water, land and soils either on or off site during operation and indefinitely post closure caused by mine ore or waste material. This is intended to primarily cover surface or underground seepage containing AMD or heavy metal ions or the transport of solid waste products as a result of embankment failure, weathering or dusting.

  • The Evolution of the TSF Liner SystemThe original ATC concept design involved the conventional best practice earthen base. This avoids the bath tub effect, expedites consolidation of the tailings - and any seepage into the ground is intercepted at the site boundary and pumped back into the TSF.The EPA advised that the regulations required that the underlying soil had to be totally protected from seepage hence a HDPE liner was stipulated for the whole TSF and the tailings were to be thickened before discharge into the TSF.Rather than using seepage through the subsoil to monitor for leaks, the EPA stipulated the need for a leak detection layer comprising a double liner where required (a fail-safe design).It was agreed that if there was no pressure head on the HDPE there was no risk of a leak even with a hole in the liner and hence the issue was to establish how much of the TSF needed to be double lined

  • Design criteria established for ATCThe double liner to the TSF was to extend beyond the edge of the design decant pond to a distance of twice the width of the design decant pond. (With underdrains this was expected to limit the phreatic surface to within the area of the double liner and this was to be justified by modeling)As the decant pond will be doubling as the mine storm water pond, the design area was to be justified in terms of a pond size that is not likely to be exceeded more than say once a year (as determined by rainfall records).

  • EPA responseThe EPA then applied the requirement that in the event of a storm (or whatever) that resulted in the pond exceeding the design boundaries, the excess water was to be removed such that the pond is reduced to the design area within seven days (this period is still under review). The operators will be required to show how they intend to dispose of the excess water. The approval to operate will most likely require that the infrastructure needed to expedite the removal of excess water is permanently commissioned.

  • Elements of the designHow was the area of the design decant pond determined?How is the phreatic surface to be restricted to the area covered by the double liner?How will the tailings be discharged into the TSF and how will it fill?What is the decant and how will it operate?How will the maximum area of the decant be monitored?How will the tailings be prevented from polluting into the future?

  • Determination of design pond area

  • Should be considering volume rather than area, but with consistent beach slopes there is a relatively consistent relationship between the two as shown below.100 yr (ARI) eventdesign pondMean pond

  • Final filled condition with design pond area

  • How will it perform? (under drain details)

  • Flow net shown in Appendix U has no legend

  • What are we looking at?

  • These contours show pressure head. (10 kPa approximately equivalent to 1 m water)

  • Similar picture as for total head analysis

  • Simpler to see the actual water head on the base liner and the effect and indeed vital importance of the tailings underdrains

  • Relevant design detailsThe TSF has been designed to perform as simulated in the flow net analyses. A few design details are now covered

  • The details of the collection and monitoring system for the leak detection layer

  • The leak detection layers will drain in zones

  • The details of the embankment liner

  • The details of the decant tower and embankment

  • Proposed filling sequenceA series of 5 drawings have been prepared by ATC to show the extent of deposited tailings and the design decant pond at various stages during the life of mine.These assume that the throughput of the plant is uniform and continuous and that 100% of the tailings are directed to the TSF.

  • At 2.46 months (tailings do not extend beyond double liner)

  • At 3.15 months

  • At 17.4 months

  • At 45.6 months

  • At 61.8 months (FULL)

  • Monitoring extent of design pondThe operating conditions set by PIRSA and the EPA will require that:The edge of the design decant pond does not extend beyond a distance of half the extent of the double liner.How this is to be monitored has yet to be finalised, but one concept would be to install sight boards. For example:

  • Sighting boards sight lines during initial operations

  • Sighting boards sight lines at final fill

  • What happens if the decant pond exceeds the design area of 15,000 m2 (volume 8,000 m3)?The 100 year ARI flood collecting on the TSF from its catchment has been estimated to add a area of water of around 38,000 m2. A volume of the order of 28,000 m3 according to ATC Fig 7.The excess water can be removed at a rate of around 390 m3 a day using the available capacity of the decant pump. This means that if the decant pond contains say 1,000 m3 (mean area of 4,000 m2) before the flood occurs it will take about 64 days to get the decant pond back to the allowable size.The questions are whether the phreatic surface will extend to the edge of the double liner within that time and if so what special approved measures will have to be on hand to expedite the removal of the excess water.

  • The question will be how quickly the phreatic surface advances through the tailings and this is a function of the permeability of the tailings.Modelling currently under way by ATC suggests that even with the 100 yr ARI flood, that the phreatic surface will not reach the boundary of the double liner in 6 months. This however has yet to be confirmed.

  • Progression of phreatic surface

  • The TSF will have sufficient water storage capacity at all times during its life to contain the 100 year ARI flood.100 yr flood 30,000 m3

  • How will the TSF be decommissioned on closure to prevent long term contamination?

  • A flow net analysis has shown that leaks through the embankment liner will flow to the collection drain

    TSF a dual (tailings and water) use storage. Designed for:2 Mt (dry weight) tailings A maximum decant pond area oOo 15,000 m2 (Volume approx 8,000 m3)The volume of water on the TSF will fluctuate dramatically fn of rainfall.The catchment area is very little more than the surface area of the TSF.Tailings discharged from northern embankment adjacent to the plant. Will flow down the gully towards the side hill confining embankment with the water flowing to the lowest point around the decant tower (water pumped back to the plant).A HDPE liner totally covers the base of the TSF and the inside embankment slopes.A double HDPE liner under the primary HDPE liner provides a leak detection layer (and a surety against base seepage) over all of the base of the TSF that will be subjected to a pressure head (of water).Tailings underdrains under the decant pond area will draw down the phreatic surface and maintain free water head within the double lined area.The TSF embankments will be constructed to the final height required to contain 2 Mt of tailings prior to the commencement of operations and will be capable of containing any conceivable flood throughout the life of the operation.The pumped decant will be maintained as long as is necessary after operations close down to ensure TSF does not flood and overtop the embankments.An upper HDPE liner will be placed on the tailings at closure and welded to the base liner to completely encapsulate tailings and remove any possibility of long term saturation of the tailings (and hence the possibility of contamination).The spillway is highly unlikely to ever be used, but must be included to cater for a flood of biblical proportions.

    Total head contours.

    Axisymmetric analysis as in a segment around a wellFree water surface on pond (should coincide with phreatic surface)Free draining boundary on decant embankmentAn impermeable base, but with tailings underdrains

    Shows phreatic surface (free water level) reduced to liner level prior to edge of double liner hence no water head on liner and no potential for leakages.TSF a dual (tailings and water) use storage. Designed for:2 Mt (dry weight) tailings A maximum decant pond area oOo 15,000 m2 (Volume approx 8,000 m3)The volume of water on the TSF wil